Use of Dietary Supplements Among People With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the United States: A Population-Based Analysis From NHANES

BACKGROUND

Dietary supplement use is prevalent in the general US population, but little is known regarding the driving reasons for their use among those with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2017 to March 2020 were used to identify adults with ASCVD. Supplement use was assessed by interviewers using label review, and surveys captured self-reported reasons for use. Demographic, clinical, medication, and laboratory characteristics were compared between supplement users and nonusers. Among individuals with ASCVD in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n=965; mean age, 65 years; 56.1% men; 73.7% White individuals), 73.1% reported taking ≥1 dietary supplements, most commonly multivitamins (35.4%), vitamin D (30.8%), and fish oil (19.8%). Of those taking supplements, 47.3% report taking them under the advisement of a health professional. Nearly one fifth (17.9%) reported taking at least 1 supplement for "heart health," most commonly fish oil (11.1%), followed by CoQ10 (4.2%) and resveratrol (1.5%). Supplement users were older (68 versus 62 years; P=0.003), included more women (45.8% versus 37.7%; P=0.17), were less likely to smoke (11.0% versus 36.4%; P<0.001), had higher levels of education (P=0.005) and income (P<0.001), and higher use of statins (69.4% versus 55.8%; P=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Supplement use is common in people with ASCVD. Among the top 3 supplements, a substantial minority were being taken under the direction of health professionals. Supplement users often report taking supplements "for heart health," despite a lack of randomized trial evidence for benefit in ASCVD, indicating a need for more patient and clinician education regarding health benefits of dietary supplements in ASCVD.

Abstract 400: Cardiometabolic Profile Of Haptoglobin Genotype In A Multi-Ethnic Diabetes Cohort

Background: Haptoglobin has three common genotypes: Hp 1-1, Hp 2-1, and Hp 2-2. The Hp 2-2 genotype, known to have poorer antioxidizing capacity, is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes in select patients with diabetes. In this study, we explore the association between various cardiometabolic biomarker profiles and the three Hp genotypes in a multiethnic population.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed for all participants with diabetes in the Dallas Heart Study and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohorts. Hp genotype was measured in 1,158 participants (399 from DHS and 759 from MESA) using ELISA technique (Savyon Diagnostics, Ltd). Associations between Hp genotype and 26 cardiometabolic circulating and imaging biomarkers were assessed by ANOVA and stratified by ethnicity.

Results: The study included 51% women, 44% Black (513 of 1,158: Hp 1-1=45%, Hp 2-1=35%, Hp 2-2=20%), 26% Hispanic (300 of 1,158: Hp 1-1=25%, Hp 2-1=49%, Hp 2-2=26%), 20% White (237 of 1,158: Hp 1-1=16%, Hp 2-1=56%, Hp 2-2=28%), and 9.2% Asian/Pacific Islander/East Indian (107 of 1,158: Hp 1-1=15%, Hp 2-1=36%, Hp 2-2=49%) participants. Significant differences were seen in lipid metabolism as well as atherosclerosis, inflammatory, structural, and endothelial markers with no significant differences seen in imaging biomarkers. In White participants, Hp 1-1 was associated with elevated total cholesterol (p=0.016), LDL-p (p=0.001), and LDL-C (p=0.004). In Asian/Pacific Islander/East Indian participants, Hp 2-2 was associated with elevated systolic blood pressure (p=0.029), BMI (p=0.029), and inflammatory markers such as IL-6 (p=0.018) and D-dimer (p=0.027). In Black participants, Hp 2-2 was associated with elevated ICAM (p=0.048) and BMI (p=0.007). Lastly, in Hispanic participants, no significant associations were seen. In exploratory analysis, when comparing Hp 1-1 and Hp 2-1 with Hp 2-2, there was greater magnitude effect size of certain biomarkers in Black and Asian participants, suggesting potential differential effects by ethnicity.

Conclusion: Associations between Hp genotype and various cardiometabolic biomarkers are varied and ethnicity dependent with further studies needed to investigate the underlying physiologic mechanisms.

Effects of Influenza Vaccine on Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Influenza infection causes considerable morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease. We assessed the effects of the influenza vaccine on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Methods and Results

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through January 2020 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing the effects of influenza vaccine on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. Estimates were reported as random effects risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. Analyses were stratified by study design into randomized controlled trials and observational studies. A total of 16 studies (n=237 058), including 4 randomized controlled trials (n=1667) and 12 observational studies (n=235 391), were identified. Participants' mean age was 69.2±7.01 years, 36.6% were women, 65.1% had hypertension, 31.1% had diabetes mellitus, and 23.4% were smokers. At a median follow‐up duration of 19.5 months, influenza vaccine was associated with a lower risk of all‐cause mortality (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60–0.93 [P=0.01]), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.80–0.84 [P<0.001]), and major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80–0.94 [P<0.001]) compared with control. The use of the influenza vaccine was not associated with a statistically significant reduction of myocardial infarction (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.49–1.09 [P=0.12]) compared with control.

Conclusions

Data from both randomized controlled trials and observational studies support the use of the influenza vaccine in adults with cardiovascular disease to reduce mortality and cardiovascular events, as currently supported by clinical guidelines. Clinicians and health systems should continue to promote the influenza vaccine as part of comprehensive secondary prevention.

P3822Risk prediction for ASCVD in primary prevention patients on statin therapy

Background

Statins are now widely used for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, existing risk prediction models were developed primarily on patients not on statins. We developed a novel model to estimate the risk of ASCVD among contemporary patients taking statins.

Methods

Using combined data from 3 large NIH-sponsored cohort studies: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities, Framingham Offspring Study, and Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis we examined adults aged 40–79 years without prior ASCVD who were on statin therapy at the baseline exam. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with a 10-year risk of CV death, MI, or stroke. Age, sex, and race were forced into the model while other potential candidate predictors were retained if statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Interaction terms with age, sex, and race were retained if significant at the 0.01 level. The model was assessed with c-statistic and calibration plots of observed events versus model-based risks after cross-validation and contrasted with the Pooled Cohorts Equations (PCE) recommended by the current U.S. guidelines.

Results

Among 2333 primary prevention patients on statins at baseline, a total of 220 events occurred over a median 8.8 years of follow-up. Most risk factors retained in our final model overlapped with those included in the PCE (age, sex, race, systolic blood pressure [sBP], diabetes, smoking, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol). Our model also included creatinine clearance, aspirin use, and the interaction between age and sBP. Optimism-corrected discrimination of the new model was marginally higher than PCE: 0.69 (95% CI 0.66–0.72) versus 0.68 (95% CI 0.65–0.72). Cross-validated calibration was superior on our contemporary sample, especially at the higher levels of risk (Figure), where PCE over-estimated risk.

Calibration plots

Conclusion

Accurate estimation of 10-year ASCVD risk among patients currently on statins necessitates recalibration of the current PCE model or application of our algorithm developed specifically for this cohort. This might help avoid over-estimation of risk and reduce the need for unnecessary additional lipid-lowering therapy.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Population Effect of Differences in Cholesterol Guidelines in Eastern Europe and the United States

IMPORTANCE

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for the management of blood cholesterol and the current European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines differ in how they identify adults in need of statin therapy; furthermore, it is unclear how this difference translates into numbers and characteristics of patients recommended for treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of the ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS cholesterol guidelines when applied to a population-based sample.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We used nationally representative data for 3055 adults aged 40 to 65 years from the 2007-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) for the United States and for 1060 adults aged 40 to 65 years from the 2011 Nadciśnięnie Tętnicze w Polsce survey for Poland. Data analysis was conducted from May 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The number and characteristics of adults recommended for statin therapy according to the ACC/AHA and ESC/EAS guidelines were evaluated, and characteristics were compared between adults with discordant recommendations.

RESULTS

The 3136 US adults in NHANES (2007-2012) aged 40 to 65 years represented 100.1 million adults; after excluding the 81 patients with missing data, these population estimates translate to 97.9 million adults. Similarly, the 1060 Polish adults in NATPOL (2011) aged 40 to 65 years represent 13.5 million adults. Using weighted data, in the United States, 43.8% (95% CI, 40.9%-46.7%) of adults would be recommended for statin therapy according to ACC/AHA guidelines and 39.1% (95% CI, 36.4%-41.8%) according to ESC/EAS guidelines. In Poland, 49.9% (95% CI, 46.9%-52.9%) of adults would be recommended for statin therapy under ACC/AHA guidelines compared with 47.6% (95% CI, 44.6%-50.7%) under ESC/EAS guidelines. Among individuals without cardiovascular disease and not currently taking statins, 11.0% of US and 10.5% of Polish adults had discordant guideline recommendations. Compared with individuals recommended for statin therapy by the ESC/EAS guidelines but not the ACC/AHA guidelines, those recommended for statin therapy under the ACC/AHA guidelines only had less chronic kidney disease; however, these individuals were also more likely to smoke, have lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and have higher predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Despite differences in the ACC/AHA and EAS/ESC guidelines, the numbers of adults aged 40 to 65 years recommended for cholesterol-lowering therapy under each guideline were similar when applied to nationwide representative samples from both the United States and Poland. Discordant recommendations were driven by differences in the risk equations used in the 2 guidelines and different recommendations for adults with chronic kidney disease.

Abstract 118: Are Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Receiving Appropriate Lipid Management? Insights from the PALM Registry

Background: Prior ATPIII lipid guidelines recommended statin therapy for patients with clinical ASCVD to achieve low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets, while the 2013 ACC/AHA lipid guidelines recommend high-intensity statin therapy for all ASCVD patients. How closely these recommendations are followed in routine clinical practice is unknown.

Methods: We evaluated statin use, intensity, and LDL-C values in 1,483 patients with ASCVD (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease) enrolled and seen serially at 62 geographically dispersed US cardiology and primary care clinics in the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) Registry between May - September 2015. Factors associated with high intensity statin use (atorvastatin ≥40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥20 mg daily) and LDL-C <70 mg/dL were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Of 1,483 ASCVD patients, 86.2% were on a statin, but only 31.4% were on a high-intensity statin. Overall, 64.0% had an LDL-C <100 mg/dL, but only 29.0% had an LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Factors associated with high-intensity statin use in multivariable regression were younger age (OR 0.74 per 10 year increase, p<0.001, 95% CI 0.66-0.83), male sex (OR 1.69, p<0.001, 95% CI, 1.32-2.16), cerebrovascular disease (OR 1.55, p=0.008, 95% CI 1.12-2.13), coronary heart disease (OR 2.42, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.67-3.50), and being seen by a cardiologist (OR 1.35, p =0.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.81). Factors associated with an increased likelihood of LDL-C<70 were male sex (OR 1.55, p=0.001, 95% CI 1.20-2.01), white (OR 1.62, p=0.03, 95% CI 1.04-2.5-, diabetes (OR 1.64, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.29-2.09) and being seen by a cardiologist (OR 1.94, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.41-2.67).

Discussion: Substantial gaps in care remain for secondary prevention of ASCVD despite simplified recommendations. While the majority of patients with ASCVD in community practice are on a statin, only one-third are on high intensity statins and over two-thirds have LDL ≥70 mg/dL.