1
|
Gatta LA, Al-Shibli N, Hughes BL, Lyerly AD. Pregnancy inclusion in US statewide scarce resource allocation guidelines during COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:100984. [PMID: 37119969 PMCID: PMC10133025 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Luke A Gatta
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University Hospital, 2608 Erwin Rd, Ste 220, Durham, NC, 27705.
| | - Noor Al-Shibli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | - Brenna L Hughes
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC
| | - Anne D Lyerly
- Center for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Talati AN, Gilmore KL, Hardisty EE, Lyerly AD, Rini C, Vora NL. Diagnostic yield and psychological outcomes among women pursuing trio-exome sequencing: Do women with recurrent anomalous fetal phenotypes experience more negative psychological outcomes? Prenat Diagn 2023; 43:569-578. [PMID: 36690925 PMCID: PMC10176200 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe psychological outcomes among people with recurrent anomalous pregnancies pursuing trio-exome sequencing (exome sequencing (ES)) compared to those with one affected. METHODS We analyzed data from a prospective ES cohort, enrolling patients with major fetal anomaly and normal microarray. Participants completed validated scales before and after ES. We (1) compared responses of those with multiple anomalous pregnancies to those with one affected and (2) conducted linear regression to examine associations between multiple affected pregnancies and post-ES constructs. RESULTS Of 166 trios, 61 (37%) received results from ES. Forty (24%) had more than one affected pregnancy and 45% of those received a result explaining the fetal phenotype. All participants had clinically significant presequencing generalized psychological distress. For the 93 who completed the post-ES surveys, those with multiple affected pregnancies had higher psychological adaptation scores but worse test related distress scores (9.3 (6.2) versus 7.1(5.6), p = 0.12) and (14.3 (1.5) versus 15.4 (1.4), p = 0.01). In linear regression models, there were no significant differences in post-ES constructs after adjusting for clinically relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS All individuals experienced significant generalized psychological distress in the pre-ES period, extending our knowledge of how pregnancy history contributes to parental sequencing outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha N Talati
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelly L Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily E Hardisty
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne D Lyerly
- Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Neeta L Vora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sewell CA, Sheehan SM, Gill MS, Henry LM, Bucci-Rechtweg C, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Lyerly AD, McKinney LC, Hatfield KP, Baer GR, Sahin L, Nguyen CP. Scientific, ethical, and legal considerations for the inclusion of pregnant people in clinical trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:805-811. [PMID: 35934117 PMCID: PMC9351207 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Clinical trials to address the COVID-19 public health emergency have broadly excluded pregnant people from participation, illustrating a long-standing trend of clinical trial exclusion that has led to a clear knowledge gap and unmet need in the treatment and prevention of medical conditions experienced during pregnancy and of pregnancy-related conditions. Drugs (includes products such as drugs, biologics, biosimilars and vaccines) approved for a certain medical condition in adults are also approved for use in pregnant adults with the same medical condition, unless contraindicated for use in pregnancy. However, there are limited pregnancy-specific data on risks and benefits of drugs in pregnant people, despite their approval for all adults. The United States Food and Drug Administration-approved medical products are used widely by pregnant people, 90% of whom take at least 1 medication during the course of their pregnancy despite there being sparse data from clinical trials on these products in pregnancy. This overall lack of clinical data precludes informed decision-making, causing clinicians and pregnant patients to have to decide whether to pursue treatment without an adequate understanding of potential effects. Although some United States Food and Drug Administration initiatives and other federal efforts have helped to promote the inclusion of pregnant people in clinical research, broader collaboration and reforms are needed to address challenges related to the design and conduct of trials that enroll pregnant people, and to forge a culture of widespread inclusion of pregnant people in clinical research. This article summarizes the scientific, ethical, and legal considerations governing research conducted during pregnancy, as discussed during a recent subject matter expert convening held by the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy and the United States Food and Drug Administration on this topic. This article also recommends strategies for overcoming impediments to inclusion and trial conduct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine A Sewell
- Division of Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
| | | | - Mira S Gill
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Washington, DC
| | - Leslie Meltzer Henry
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law and Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA
| | - Anne D Lyerly
- Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Leslie C McKinney
- Division of Pharmacology Toxicology for Rare Diseases, Pediatrics, Urology and Reproductive Medicine, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Kimberly P Hatfield
- Office of Pediatric Therapeutics, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Gerri R Baer
- Office of Pediatric Therapeutics, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Leyla Sahin
- Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Christine P Nguyen
- Office of Rare Diseases, Pediatrics, Urology and Reproductive Medicine, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jaffe EF, Spach NC, Sullivan KA, Lyerly AD, Goldfarb IT. Experiences Navigating the Pregnancy Care Continuum During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Womens Health Issues 2022; 33:235-241. [PMID: 36496341 PMCID: PMC9640408 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented changes in care delivery across the pregnancy care continuum. Our primary objective with this research was to characterize the range of ways that the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic affected pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum care experiences. METHODS Pregnant and recently pregnant patients (n = 20) from obstetrics and gynecology clinical sites associated with Massachusetts General Hospital were interviewed about their experiences with prenatal care, childbirth, and postpartum care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interview transcripts were analyzed for emergent themes. RESULTS This sample included 20 pregnant and postpartum people, including 11 individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 during pregnancy or postpartum and nine with suspected infection. The ways in which COVID-19 or suspected COVID-19 affected experiences of prenatal care, childbirth, and postpartum care were complex and varied. Three themes were identified across narratives of pregnancy, birth, and postpartum care: patient perceptions of diminished access to care, stigma due to COVID-19 infection, and limited capacity of providers to honor patient preferences. CONCLUSIONS A better understanding of pregnant and recently pregnant people's experiences during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic can inform infection control policies and clinical care delivery practices that are more congruent with the needs and values of pregnant, birthing, and postpartum people as institutions craft responses to future pandemics. Approaches that maximize meaningful access across the pregnancy care continuum, center patients' priorities within adapted care models, and honor patient preferences as much as possible are important aspects of an appropriate response to future waves of COVID-19 and other pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elana F. Jaffe
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Natalie C. Spach
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Kristen A. Sullivan
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,Center for Bioethics, Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Anne D. Lyerly
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,Center for Bioethics, Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ilona T. Goldfarb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,Correspondence to: Ilona T. Goldfarb, MD, MPH, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114. Tel.: (617) 724-2229
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walker RL, MacKay D, Waltz M, Lyerly AD, Fisher JA. Ethical Criteria for Improved Human Subject Protections in Phase I Healthy Volunteer Trials. Ethics Hum Res 2022; 44:2-21. [PMID: 36047278 PMCID: PMC9931499 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Phase I healthy volunteer trials test the safety and tolerability of investigational pharmaceuticals. In them, participants are exposed to study-drug risks without the possibility of direct medical benefit and typically must spend days or weeks in a residential research facility. Monetary payments are used to incentivize enrollment and compensate participants for their time. Together, these features of phase I healthy volunteer trials create a research context that differs markedly from most other clinical research, including by enrolling disproportionate numbers of economically disadvantaged people of color as participants. Due to these unique trial features and participation patterns, traditional biomedical research oversight offers inadequate ethical and policy guidance for phase I healthy volunteer research. This article details five ethical criteria crafted to be responsive to the particularities of this type of research: translational science value, fair opportunity and burden sharing, fair compensation for service, experiential welfare, and enhanced voice and recourse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Walker
- Professor of social medicine and of philosophy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Douglas MacKay
- Associate professor of public policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Margaret Waltz
- Research associate in the Department of Social Medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Anne D Lyerly
- Professor of social medicine and on the core faculty in the Center for Bioethics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Jill A Fisher
- Professor of social medicine and on the core faculty in the Center for Bioethics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
King Z, Lyerly AD, Knittel AK. Safekeeping of Pregnant People Experiencing Incarceration. Women Crim Justice 2022; 33:363-377. [PMID: 37789904 PMCID: PMC10545335 DOI: 10.1080/08974454.2022.2104986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Safekeeping involves transferring individuals from jails to prisons without the presence of a conviction. In North Carolina, safekeeping is used for pregnant people with the aim of providing better prenatal care. We interviewed 14 stakeholders in the safekeeping process including sheriffs, clinicians, advocates, and lawyers. Three key themes emerged: jails' inability to provide care for pregnant individuals; safekeeping as an additional punishment to incarceration; and differing attitudes on the necessity of safekeeping. Participants perceived that while there may be some benefits of safekeeping such as enhanced prenatal care, safekeeping can also lead to worsened conditions for pregnant people experiencing incarceration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe King
- Duke University, Trinity College of Arts & Sciences; 117 Physics Building; 120 Science Dr.; Durham, NC 27708; United States
| | - Anne D. Lyerly
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, 333 South Columbia St, 333 MacNider Hall, CB# 7240, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; United States
| | - Andrea K. Knittel
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 3027 Old Clinic Building, CB#7570, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spach NC, Jaffe EF, Sullivan KA, Feltner C, Lyerly AD, Goldfarb IT. Emotional Experiences of Pregnant and Postpartum People with Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19 Infection During the Initial Surge of the Pandemic. Women's Health Reports 2022; 3:405-413. [PMID: 35559356 PMCID: PMC9081050 DOI: 10.1089/whr.2021.0143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic may have a unique emotional impact on pregnant people. This qualitative study aimed to characterize the emotional effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on pregnant and recently pregnant patients who had either suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection during the initial 6 months of the pandemic. Methods: Pregnant and recently pregnant participants (n = 20) from Massachusetts General Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology clinical sites with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection were interviewed about their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interviews were transcribed and coded using NVivo 12 software. Using data display matrices, thematic analysis was performed to identify emergent, crosscutting themes. Results: Twenty pregnant and postpartum patients participated of whom 12 had confirmed COVID-19 infection and 8 had suspected infection. The most frequently described emotions were anxiety (90%), uncertainty (80%), fear (70%), relief (65%), and sadness (60%). The following three crosscutting themes were identified: risk, protection, and change. The ways in which participants articulated their emotional reactions to the themes of risk, protection, and change were complex and varied. Conclusions: There was a broad range of negative and positive emotional experiences of pregnancy, birth, and the postpartum period during the first 4 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. A better understanding of pregnant people's emotional experiences may lead to changes in clinical practice and institutional policies that are more supportive of their needs and congruent with their values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie C. Spach
- Center for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Public Health Leadership, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elana F. Jaffe
- Center for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Public Health Leadership, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kristen A. Sullivan
- Center for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Cindy Feltner
- Department of Public Health Leadership, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne D. Lyerly
- Center for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ilona T. Goldfarb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lyerly AD, Verite A, Marshall MF. Restrictions on Abortion, Social Justice and the Ethics of Research in Maternal-Fetal Therapy Trials. Am J Bioeth 2022; 22:78-81. [PMID: 35258420 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2030588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
|
9
|
Talati AN, Gilmore KL, Hardisty EE, Lyerly AD, Rini C, Vora NL. Parental Motivations for and Adaptation to Trio‐Exome Sequencing in a Prospective Prenatal Testing Cohort: Beyond the Diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:775-782. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.6112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Asha N. Talati
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Division of Maternal‐Fetal Medicine University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill NC
| | - Kelly L. Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Division of Maternal‐Fetal Medicine University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill NC
| | - Emily E. Hardisty
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Division of Maternal‐Fetal Medicine University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill NC
| | - Anne D. Lyerly
- Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Medical Social Sciences Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University Chicago IL
| | - Neeta L. Vora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Division of Maternal‐Fetal Medicine University of North Carolina School of Medicine Chapel Hill NC
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Spach NC, Jaffe EF, Sullivan KA, Goldfarb IT, Anderson JR, Coleman J, Gilbert SZ, Gross MS, Rahangdale L, Faden RR, Lyerly AD. Pregnant Individuals' Views on Fetal Tissue Research in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 138:755-761. [PMID: 34619743 PMCID: PMC8542627 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fetal tissue research has driven significant medical advances but remains publicly contentious in the United States. The views of pregnant individuals in the United States regarding the donation of fetal tissue offer an important and previously unexplored perspective on this issue. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of data from two separate, broader qualitative studies. Pregnant and recently pregnant individuals (N=79) from clinical sites at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Johns Hopkins University, and Massachusetts General Hospital were interviewed individually using a semi-structured guide addressing a range of issues related to infectious disease research and pregnancy, including the acceptability of fetal tissue research. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for emergent themes. RESULTS Among this sample of predominantly Black (61%), reproductive-aged pregnant and recently pregnant participants, the majority (72%) generally supported fetal tissue research. The following three themes were identified: choice, respect, and meaning. Respondents discussed the deeply personal nature of decisions surrounding fetal tissue research, emphasizing the importance of informed consent and respect for the person's emotional state when approaching for consent. The ways in which participants regarded how to respectfully handle fetal tissue also shaped views about the acceptability of donation, both for and against. For many participants, fetal tissue donation to research represented one way of ascribing meaning to pregnancy termination or loss. CONCLUSION Among this diverse sample of pregnant and recently pregnant individuals, most were supportive of fetal tissue donation for research. A better understanding of pregnant individuals' views on this topic may lead to policies and practices that are congruent with the needs and values of people facing decisions regarding the disposition of fetal remains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie C Spach
- Center for Bioethics, the Department of Social Medicine, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UNC School of Medicine, and the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts; the Berman Institute of Bioethics and the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; the Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut; and the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Krubiner CB, Faden RR, Karron RA, Little MO, Lyerly AD, Abramson JS, Beigi RH, Cravioto AR, Durbin AP, Gellin BG, Gupta SB, Kaslow DC, Kochhar S, Luna F, Saenz C, Sheffield JS, Tindana PO. Pregnant women & vaccines against emerging epidemic threats: Ethics guidance for preparedness, research, and response. Vaccine 2021; 39:85-120. [PMID: 31060949 PMCID: PMC7735377 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Zika virus, influenza, and Ebola have called attention to the ways in which infectious disease outbreaks can severely - and at times uniquely - affect the health interests of pregnant women and their offspring. These examples also highlight the critical need to proactively consider pregnant women and their offspring in vaccine research and response efforts to combat emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. Historically, pregnant women and their offspring have been largely excluded from research agendas and investment strategies for vaccines against epidemic threats, which in turn can lead to exclusion from future vaccine campaigns amidst outbreaks. This state of affairs is profoundly unjust to pregnant women and their offspring, and deeply problematic from the standpoint of public health. To ensure that the needs of pregnant women and their offspring are fairly addressed, new approaches to public health preparedness, vaccine research and development, and vaccine delivery are required. This Guidance offers 22 concrete recommendations that provide a roadmap for the ethically responsible, socially just, and respectful inclusion of the interests of pregnant women in the development and deployment of vaccines against emerging pathogens. The Guidance was developed by the Pregnancy Research Ethics for Vaccines, Epidemics, and New Technologies (PREVENT) Working Group - a multidisciplinary, international team of 17 experts specializing in bioethics, maternal immunization, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, pediatrics, philosophy, public health, and vaccine research and policy - in consultation with a variety of external experts and stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carleigh B Krubiner
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Ruth R Faden
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ruth A Karron
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Margaret O Little
- Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA
| | - Anne D Lyerly
- University of North Carolina Center for Bioethics, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jon S Abramson
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Richard H Beigi
- Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Anna P Durbin
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carla Saenz
- Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wickremsinhe MN, Little MO, Carter AS, Sullivan KA, Lyerly AD. Beyond "Vessels and Vectors": A Global Review of Registered HIV-Related Clinical Trials with Pregnant Women. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019; 28:93-99. [PMID: 30124366 PMCID: PMC6343191 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the early 1990s, the HIV research agenda has prioritized to some degree the inclusion of pregnant women. However, concerns remain regarding the extent to which pregnant women's own health needs are addressed, representation in trials of HIV preventives or treatments for comorbidities, and equitable study of newer medications during pregnancy. METHODS We employed a keyword search of the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify interventional HIV-related trials conducted with pregnant women between January 2001 and December 2015. Retained trials were coded according to several key variables (e.g., study endpoints, trial phase, study compound) and analyzed using information provided in the database. RESULTS In total, 63 trials studying use of a pharmacological compound during pregnancy were conducted across 35 countries and sponsored by 74 unique organizations, including pharmaceutical companies. Of trials analyzed, 86% (n = 54) listed maternal outcomes as a primary endpoint. More than 35% (n = 23) of trials assessed pharmacokinetic parameters of a study compound during pregnancy. Of 45 trials specifically studying HIV-related medication(s), just 4% (n = 2) focused on HIV preventives. One trial studied tuberculosis in HIV-infected pregnant women; 11 studied malaria. On average, medications were studied during pregnancy 4.4 years after licensure. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that trials with pregnant women are conducted across a range of countries and sponsors, and much progress has been made to better address pregnant women's own health needs in HIV research. However, our findings confirm other concerns, for example, lack of HIV preventives studied and the lag between medication licensure and study during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Margaret O. Little
- Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Alice S. Carter
- Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Kristen A. Sullivan
- Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Anne D. Lyerly
- Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shah SK, Kimmelman J, Lyerly AD, Lynch HF, Miller FG, Palacios R, Pardo CA, Zorrilla C. Response-Evaluating human trials: FDA's role. Science 2018; 360:1308-1309. [PMID: 29930129 DOI: 10.1126/science.aau0865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S K Shah
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
| | - J Kimmelman
- Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1X1, Canada
| | - A D Lyerly
- Center for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - H F Lynch
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - F G Miller
- Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | - C A Pardo
- Department of Neurology, Neurovirus Emerging in the Americas Study (NEAS), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - C Zorrilla
- University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, PR 00921, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shah SK, Kimmelman J, Lyerly AD, Lynch HF, Miller FG, Palacios R, Pardo CA, Zorrilla C. Bystander risk, social value, and ethics of human research. Science 2018; 360:158-159. [PMID: 29650663 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaq0917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S K Shah
- University of Washington and Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | - A D Lyerly
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - H F Lynch
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - F G Miller
- Weil Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - C A Pardo
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - C Zorrilla
- University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Though many women in need of access to HIV preventive regimes are pregnant, there is a dearth of data to guide these care decisions. While oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been shown to prevent HIV infection in numerous high-risk populations, pregnant women have been excluded from all major prospective trials. We propose for ethical examination a theoretical trial-a prospective, observational study of PrEP for pregnant women at risk for HIV in sub-Saharan Africa-highlighting an ethical tradeoff that characterizes issues faced for advancing research in pregnancy. On the one hand, an "opportunistic" study design has certain ethical advantages: as formally construed, the research activity usually begins after decisions to use PrEP during pregnancy are made in the clinical setting. This minimizes research risks and avoids ethical problems that a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing PrEP to placebo would entail, particularly withholding care proven beneficial in other populations. On the other hand, observational studies yield less precise information than RCTs. This raises a broader question about the pace of research with pregnant women, as it typically takes many years after a drug's approval for use in the general population to determine safety of the medication in pregnancy. Such delays can have the effect of making it impossible to ethically conduct an RCT with pregnant women, reducing the likelihood that the research community is able to obtain robust, pregnancy-specific evidence. While an observational cohort is potentially the most ethically and scientifically justified research design to study PrEP in pregnancy, earlier involvement of pregnant women in studies of newer preventives may lead to evidence that is more timely and robust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen A. Sullivan
- University of North Carolina Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
| | - Anne D. Lyerly
- University of North Carolina Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vora NL, Powell B, Brandt A, Strande N, Hardisty E, Gilmore K, Foreman AKM, Wilhelmsen K, Bizon C, Reilly J, Owen P, Powell CM, Skinner D, Rini C, Lyerly AD, Boggess KA, Weck K, Berg JS, Evans JP. Prenatal exome sequencing in anomalous fetuses: new opportunities and challenges. Genet Med 2017; 19:1207-1216. [PMID: 28518170 PMCID: PMC5675748 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 02/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeWe investigated the diagnostic and clinical performance of exome sequencing in fetuses with sonographic abnormalities with normal karyotype and microarray and, in some cases, normal gene-specific sequencing.MethodsExome sequencing was performed on DNA from 15 anomalous fetuses and from the peripheral blood of their parents. Parents provided consent to be informed of diagnostic results in the fetus, medically actionable findings in the parents, and their identification as carrier couples for significant autosomal recessive conditions. We assessed the perceptions and understanding of exome sequencing using mixed methods in 15 mother-father dyads.ResultsIn seven (47%) of 15 fetuses, exome sequencing provided a diagnosis or possible diagnosis with identification of variants in the following genes: COL1A1, MUSK, KCTD1, RTTN, TMEM67, PIEZO1 and DYNC2H1. One additional case revealed a de novo nonsense mutation in a novel candidate gene (MAP4K4). The perceived likelihood that exome sequencing would explain the results (5.2 on a 10-point scale) was higher than the approximately 30% diagnostic yield discussed in pretest counseling.ConclusionExome sequencing had diagnostic utility in a highly select population of fetuses where a genetic diagnosis was highly suspected. Challenges related to genetics literacy and variant interpretation must be addressed by highly tailored pre- and posttest genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeta L. Vora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bradford Powell
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Alicia Brandt
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Natasha Strande
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Emily Hardisty
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kelly Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ann Katherine M. Foreman
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (NC TraCS) Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kirk Wilhelmsen
- Departments of Genetics and Neurology, Renaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Chris Bizon
- Departments of Genetics and Neurology, Renaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jason Reilly
- Departments of Genetics and Neurology, Renaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Phil Owen
- Departments of Genetics and Neurology, Renaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Cynthia M. Powell
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetics and Metabolism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Debra Skinner
- FPG Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Anne D. Lyerly
- Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kim A. Boggess
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Karen Weck
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jonathan S. Berg
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - James P. Evans
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Krubiner CB, Faden RR, Cadigan RJ, Gilbert SZ, Henry LM, Little MO, Mastroianni AC, Namey EE, Sullivan KA, Lyerly AD. Advancing HIV research with pregnant women: navigating challenges and opportunities. AIDS 2016; 30:2261-5. [PMID: 27490637 PMCID: PMC5014683 DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000001214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Concerns about including pregnant women in research have led to a dearth of evidence to guide safe and effective treatment and prevention of HIV in pregnancy. To better understand why these evidence gaps persist and inform guidance for responsible inclusion of pregnant women in the HIV research agenda, we aimed to learn what HIV experts perceive as barriers and constraints to conducting this research. METHODS We conducted a series of group and one-on-one consultations with 62 HIV investigators and clinicians to elicit their views and experiences conducting HIV research involving pregnant women. Thematic analysis was used to identify priorities and perceived barriers to HIV research with pregnant women. RESULTS Experts discussed a breadth of needed research, including safety, efficacy, and appropriate dosing of: newer antiretrovirals for pregnant women, emerging preventive strategies, and treatment for coinfections. Challenges to conducting research on pregnancy and HIV included ethical concerns, such as how to weigh risks and benefits in pregnancy; legal concerns, such as restrictive interpretations of current regulations and liability issues; financial and professional disincentives, including misaligned funder priorities and fear of reputational damage; and analytical and logistical complexities, such as challenges recruiting and retaining pregnant women to sufficiently power analyses. CONCLUSION Investigators face numerous challenges to conducting needed HIV research with pregnant women. Advancing such research will require clearer guidance regarding ethical and legal uncertainties; incentives that encourage rather than discourage investigators to undertake such research; and a commitment to earlier development of safety and efficacy data through creative trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carleigh B Krubiner
- aJohns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland bDepartment of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina cKennedy Institute for Ethics and Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC dUniversity of Washington School of Law, Seattle, Washington eFHI360, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gupta A, Mathad JS, Abdel-Rahman SM, Albano JD, Botgros R, Brown V, Browning RS, Dawson L, Dooley KE, Gnanashanmugam D, Grinsztejn B, Hernandez-Diaz S, Jean-Philippe P, Kim P, Lyerly AD, Mirochnick M, Mofenson LM, Montepiedra G, Piper J, Sahin L, Savic R, Smith B, Spiegel H, Swaminathan S, Watts DH, White A. Toward Earlier Inclusion of Pregnant and Postpartum Women in Tuberculosis Drug Trials: Consensus Statements From an International Expert Panel. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:761-769. [PMID: 26658057 PMCID: PMC4772846 DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2015] [Accepted: 11/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Tuberculosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in women of childbearing age (15-44 years). Despite increased tuberculosis risk during pregnancy, optimal clinical treatment remains unclear: safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data for many tuberculosis drugs are lacking, and trials of promising new tuberculosis drugs exclude pregnant women. To advance inclusion of pregnant and postpartum women in tuberculosis drug trials, the US National Institutes of Health convened an international expert panel. Discussions generated consensus statements (>75% agreement among panelists) identifying high-priority research areas during pregnancy, including: (1) preventing progression of latent tuberculosis infection, especially in women coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus; (2) evaluating new agents/regimens for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis; and (3) evaluating safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of tuberculosis drugs already in use during pregnancy and postpartum. Incorporating pregnant women into clinical trials would extend evidence-based tuberculosis prevention and treatment standards to this special population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amita Gupta
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University
| | - Jyoti S Mathad
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Center for Global Health Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Susan M Abdel-Rahman
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
| | | | - Radu Botgros
- European Medicines Agency, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vikki Brown
- Women's Health and Medical Affairs, INC Research, Raleigh
| | - Renee S Browning
- Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
| | - Liza Dawson
- Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
| | - Kelly E Dooley
- Divisions of Clinical Pharmacology and Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore
| | | | - Beatriz Grinsztejn
- Instituto de Pesquisa Clinica Evandro Chagas-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Patrick Jean-Philippe
- Department of Health and Human Services, HJF-DAIDS, a division of The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, contractor to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
| | - Peter Kim
- Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
| | - Anne D Lyerly
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Center for Bioethics and Department of Social Medicine
| | - Mark Mirochnick
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts
| | - Lynne M Mofenson
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health
| | - Grace Montepiedra
- Department of Biostatistics, Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health
| | - Jeanna Piper
- Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
| | - Leyla Sahin
- Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health, FDA Office of New Drugs, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Radojka Savic
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Schools of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of California San Francisco
| | - Betsy Smith
- Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
| | - Hans Spiegel
- Department of Health and Human Services, HJF-DAIDS, a division of The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, contractor to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
| | | | - D Heather Watts
- Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator, US Department of State, Washington D.C
| | - Amina White
- Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wilkinson JP, Lyerly AD, Masenga G, Hayat SK, Prabhu M. Ethical dilemmas in women's health in under-resourced settings. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 113:25-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2010] [Revised: 10/25/2010] [Accepted: 12/16/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
20
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility patients often struggle with decisions about disposition of embryos remaining after fertility treatment. We aimed to identify predictors and correlates of decisional conflict among patients facing these decisions. METHODS We analyzed results from a survey of 2210 patients from nine geographically diverse US fertility clinics. The main outcome measure was decisional conflict about embryo disposition, as measured by the decisional conflict scale (DCS). RESULTS Of 1244 respondents who returned the survey, 1005 with cryopreserved embryos and DCS scores were included in the analysis. Of the respondents, 39% reported high decisional conflict (DCS ≥ 37.5). Thoughts about future childbearing were associated with high decisional conflict: respondents who were either uncertain about whether to have a baby in the future or sure they did not want to have a baby were at higher odds of high decisional conflict than participants who desired a baby [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.93, P < 0.001 and aOR = 1.69, P = 0.04, respectively]. Also associated with high decisional conflict were being likely to have embryos thawed and discarded (aOR = 2.08, P < 0.001), donated for research (aOR = 1.66, P = 0.01) or frozen 'forever' (aOR = 1.90, P = 0.01); being likely to choose compassionate transfer if it were available (aOR = 1.65, P = 0.03); attributing high, but not full, moral status to human embryos; not having enough information; and not being satisfied with the informed consent process. CONCLUSIONS Decisional conflict about frozen embryo disposition differs according to reproductive preferences that may vary according to stage of treatment. Informed consent for embryo disposition should be revisited periodically, with serious discussions about disposition after childbearing is complete.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Lyerly
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7240, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Roelands J, Jamison MG, Lyerly AD, James AH. Consequences of smoking during pregnancy on maternal health. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009; 18:867-72. [PMID: 19514829 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the incidence of maternal cardiovascular and pulmonary events and the prevalence of other comorbid conditions among pregnant smokers. METHODS We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for pregnancy-related discharge codes for the years 2000-2004. The prevalence of various conditions and the incidence of various complications were compared between smokers and nonsmokers. RESULTS The majority of smokers were young and white and had public insurance. Smokers were more likely to have experienced deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 1.6), stroke (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2, 2.5), pulmonary embolus (OR 2.5, 95% CI 2.1, 3.0), and myocardial infarction (OR 4.6, 95% CI 3.3, 6.4). They were 3 times more likely to have experienced influenza or pneumonia (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.7, 3.2) and 15 times more likely to have bronchitis (OR 15.2, 95% CI 12.8, 18.2). They were more likely to suffer from a number of comorbidities, including asthma (OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.7, 4.2) and gastrointestinal ulcers (OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.6, 5.5). Although they were less likely to have experienced gestational diabetes (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.9, 1.0), preeclampsia (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.8, 0.9), or eclampsia (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6, 0.9), they were more than 5 times as likely to have experienced an ectopic pregnancy (OR 5.4, 95% CI 4.6, 6.3). CONCLUSIONS Smoking has a negative impact on maternal health. Counseling about the risks of smoking in pregnancy should include not only fetal risks but maternal risks as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Roelands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen D Brown
- Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bankowski BJ, Lyerly AD, Faden RR, Wallach EE. The social implications of embryo cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2005; 84:823-32. [PMID: 16213829 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2004] [Revised: 02/05/2005] [Accepted: 02/05/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the existing literature regarding the social implications of embryo cryopreservation and outline areas in need of further study. RESULT(S) The potential social impact of oocyte cryopreservation has not been investigated. Embryo cryopreservation has been increasingly used to improve the cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and expand the options available to infertile couples, yet its widespread adoption has occurred more rapidly than our ability to study the social consequences for the couples and health professionals involved. For maintaining cryopreserved embryos, the existing literature is fragmented and incompletely explores the effects on an infertile couple's psychosocial health and personal relationships, their family planning strategies, or their preferences for the disposition of the embryos. Managing unclaimed embryos continues to create challenges for assisted reproduction professionals. CONCLUSION(S) We currently lack a thorough understanding of the numerous social implications of cryopreservation. Major areas for future research include the impact of stored embryos on couples' fertility intentions and psychosocial health, factors that affect couples' decisions about embryo disposition, strategies to minimize unclaimed embryos, and the consequences of oocyte/ovarian cryopreservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon J Bankowski
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We examined the attitudes of members of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine regarding the clinical, scientific, ethical, and policy issues in maternal-fetal surgery. STUDY DESIGN A 43-question survey was distributed to all members of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Two mailings and one electronic mail reminder were sent, each with instructions to submit the survey either via US mail or the Internet. The survey included questions in six categories: physician demographic data, experience with maternal-fetal surgery, views on innovative therapies, scientific validation of currently used and proposed procedures, ethical issues, and future directions in public policy. RESULTS Of the 1639 United States members sent questionnaires, 943 replied (response rate = 59%). Forty-seven percent had referred patients for open fetal surgery for nonlethal conditions, and 69% believed physicians were obligated to inform patients of this option. Seventy-eight percent believed that innovative therapies should be performed only under institutional review board-approved protocols. Although the majority of respondents believed that certain proposed benefits of open fetal surgery for myelomeningocele could offset the risks, the majority (56%) also indicated that the procedure has not been validated. Fifty-seven percent believed that a moratorium should be imposed on open fetal surgery for nonlethal conditions, such as myelomeningocele, until a multicenter-controlled clinical trial is completed. CONCLUSIONS The use of maternal-fetal surgery for nonlethal conditions is highly controversial. The majority of maternal-fetal specialists we surveyed support further research before such procedures are integrated into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Lyerly
- Bioethics Institute and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
The use of aggregated quality of life estimates in the formation of public policy and practice guidelines raises concerns about the moral relevance of variability in values in preferences for health care. This variability may reflect unique and deeply held beliefs that may be lost when averaged with the preferences of other individuals. Feminist moral theories which argue for attention to context and particularity underline the importance of ascertaining the extent to which differences in preferences for health states reveal information which is morally relevant to clinicians and policymakers. To facilitate these considerations, we present an empirical study of preferences for the timing and occurrence of health states associated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Sixteen women between the ages of 45 and 55 were enrolled in this pilot study. Their preferences regarding five health states associated with HRT (menopausal symptoms. side effects of HRT, breast cancer, myocardial infarction, and osteoporosis) were assessed in quantitative terms known as utilities. Two standard methods, the visual analog scale (VAS) and the standard gamble (SG), were used to assess utility and time preference (calculated as a discount rate). The wide variability of responses underlines the importance of tailoring health care to individual women's preferences. Policy guidelines which incorporate utility analysis must recognize the normative limitations of aggregated preferences, and the moral relevance of individual conceptions of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Lyerly
- The Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
When surgery is performed on pregnant women for the sake of the fetus (MFS or maternal fetal surgery). it is often discussed in terms of the fetus alone. This usage exemplifies what philosophers call the fallacy of abstraction: considering a concept as if it were separable from another concept whose meaning is essentially related to it. In light of their potential separability, research on pregnant women raises the possibility of conflicts between the interests of the woman and those of the fetus. Such research should meet the requirement of equipoise. i.e., a state of genuine uncertainty about the risks and benefits of alternative interventions or noninterventions. While illustrating the fallacy of abstraction in discussions of MFS, we review the rationale for explicit acknowledgment of the essential tie between fetus and pregnant woman. Next we examine whether it is possible to meet the requirement of equipoise in research on MFS, focusing on a fetal condition called myelomeningocele. We show how issues related to equipoise in nonpregnant populations appear also in debates regarding MFS. We also examine evidence in support of claims that the requirement of equipoise has been satisfied with respect to "the fetal patient" while considering risks and benefits to gestating women only marginally or not at all. After delineating challenges and possibilities for equipoise in MFS research, we conclude with a suggestion for avoiding the fallacy of abstraction and achieving equipoise so that research on MFS may be ethically conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Lyerly
- The Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Important clinical, social, and ethical questions are associated with the evaluation and use of surgical approaches aimed at correcting fetal anatomic abnormalities. In particular, the expansion of maternal-fetal surgery to ameliorate nonlethal fetal conditions has intensified the need to address issues about the adequacy of technology assessment and the safety of those who undergo these novel procedures. APPROACH After discussions at a multidisciplinary conference, we reviewed the development and current practices of maternal-fetal surgery and analyzed the relevant ethical issues concerning the use of maternal-fetal surgery for nonlethal conditions, focusing on the correction of myelomeningocele. FINDINGS Characterizing nonvalidated maternal-fetal surgery procedures as "innovative therapy" blurs the boundaries between research and therapy and creates uncertainty about the obligations of clinicians and researchers. Further, maternal-fetal surgery raises ethical issues related to maternal risks and benefits, informed consent, distinguishing lethal from nonlethal conditions, withholding unproven treatments, entrepreneurship, and prioritization. RECOMMENDATIONS To help ensure that maternal-fetal surgery will be studied and eventually applied in a scientifically and ethically sound manner, we offer several recommendations. First, innovation in maternal-fetal surgery should be conducted and evaluated as research. Second, women must be considered research subjects in these trials. Third, the informed consent process must ensure adequate comprehension and genuine voluntariness in those considering participation. Fourth, discriminatory and fearful attitudes toward individuals with disabilities should be addressed explicitly prior to making a decision to proceed with maternal-fetal surgery in an attempt to correct such disabilities. Fifth, maternal-fetal surgery should not be performed for cosmetic indications unless and until there is reliable evidence that maternal-fetal surgery can be performed safely and that long-term side effects on women and their offspring are minimal. Sixth, centers of excellence should be established for conducting research and providing maternal-fetal surgery. Seventh, funding for research on maternal-fetal surgery should be considered in the context of societal needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Lyerly
- Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the advances in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and revisit the medical, ethical, and legal issues surrounding infertility management in HIV-infected couples. DESIGN Analytic review. RESULTS(S) HIV infection continues to be a serious public health and reproductive issue. However, present policies which allow for the categorical exclusion of HIV-infected individuals from infertility services should be reconsidered in light of improvements in the prognosis of infected individuals and a dramatic decrease in the risk of vertical transmission. An analysis of the ethical cogency of the arguments against the provision of services does not substantiate the exclusion of HIV-infected individuals; rather, the principle of justice requires that HIV-infected women be treated the same way as a woman who might have an increased risk of conceiving a child with a disability or a may have a decreased life expectancy due to a chronic illness such as diabetes. Ethical disagreement notwithstanding, with the precedents recently established by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), discrimination based on HIV status would also likely be unlawful under most circumstances. CONCLUSIONS(S) With advances in the treatment of HIV infection, contextualized counseling and a respect for patients' decisions regarding infertility treatment should be adopted as public policy. It is neither ethically nor legally justifiable to categorically exclude individuals from infertility services on the basis of HIV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A D Lyerly
- The Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21250, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- J R Moran
- Department of Pediatrics, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Challa VR, Moran JR, Turner CS, Lyerly AD. Histologic diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease. The value of concurrent hematoxylin and eosin and cholinesterase staining of rectal biopsies. Am J Clin Pathol 1987; 88:324-8. [PMID: 2443002 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/88.3.324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
False positive and negative results can complicate the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease (HD) with the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) stain. To improve the diagnostic value of this test, the authors evaluated the concurrent hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) staining of extra sections after the AChE procedure. Flash-frozen (FF), cryostat-cut (CC) sections of rectal suction biopsies from 96 patients with constipation were evaluated by AChE together with H and E staining of additional unstained sections. In 13 of 15 cases of HD with a diagnostic (positive-A) AChE pattern, the H and E sections confirmed the diagnosis. In five cases with other AChE patterns, the H and E sections were instrumental when the diagnosis was made. Of the 76 non-HD subjects with positive-B (n = 8), equivocal (n = 6), and negative (n = 62) AChE patterns, the H and E sections eliminated the diagnosis in 62 (81%). Neuronal and nerve fiber morphologic characteristics were excellent. Rebiopsies were needed in 14 subjects (19%) when there was failure in finding neurons. Simplicity, quickness, and the high quality of the histologic preparations make this procedure a useful adjunct to the AChE stain.
Collapse
|
31
|
Huntley CC, Shaffner LD, Challa VR, Lyerly AD. Histochemical diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease. Pediatrics 1982; 69:755-61. [PMID: 6176938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
A histochemical staining technique for detection of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in rectal suction biopsies was compared with the presence or absence of ganglion cells in full-thickness or suction biopsies for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease (HD) in infants and children. Biopsies from 55 of 58 children were adequate for both the AChE assay and routine pathologic examination for ganglion cells. Two patterns of AChE staining were noted. With pattern A, prominent nerve fibers staining for AChE were seen throughout the muscularis mucosa and the lamina propria. With pattern B, similar fibers were seen only in the muscularis mucosa and the areas of lamina propria that were immediately adjacent. No "false-negative" AChE staining reactions were found in patients with HD. No "false-positive" reactions showing pattern A were found. This pattern was diagnostic for HD. Three false-positive reactions were found showing pattern B in patients with conditions other than HD. Among 22 patients with HD, 19 were males and three were females. Pattern A occurred in all age groups and in both sexes. Pattern B in patients with HD was seen exclusively in male infants 1 month of age or less. Experience suggests that the AChE staining of rectal suction biopsies is an excellent screening test for HD in infants and children. If pattern B is encountered, however, the specimen should be examined by routine pathologic techniques for the presence of submucosal ganglion cells.
Collapse
|
32
|
Huntley CC, Lyerly AD, Littlejohn MP, Rodriguez-Trias H, Bowers GW. ABO hemolytic disease in Puerto Rico and North Carolina. Pediatrics 1976; 57:875-83. [PMID: 934745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
A prospective study was carried out at the University of Puerto Rico Hospital (UPRH) and at the North Carolina Baptist Hospital (NCBH) in order to establish the incidence of ABO hemolytic disease (ABO HD) in the two populations and to determine the relationship of intestinal parasitic infection of the mother to ABO HD in the infant. The incidence of ABO HD among UPRH at risk pregnancies (type O mother with type A or B infant) was 28.3% or 1 in 3.5 as compared with 18.4% or 1 in 5.4 of NCBH at risk pregnancies (P less than .05). Indirect Coombs' tests in cord sera, representing the passive transfer from mother to fetus of antibodies directed toward antigens on the infants' erythrocytes, were positive in 58.8% of UPRH at risk infants as opposed to 40.4% of NCBH at risk infants (P less than .001). Maternal isohemagglutinin titers at term were higher in type O UPRH mothers than in type O NCBH mothers (P less than .01). A relationship between helminth parasitic infection of the mother and ABO HD in the infant was suspected but not proved.
Collapse
|
33
|
Huntley CC, Robbins JB, Lyerly AD, Buckley RH. Characterization of precipitating antibodies to ruminant serum and milk proteins in humans with selective IgA deficiency. N Engl J Med 1971; 284:7-10. [PMID: 4992076 DOI: 10.1056/nejm197101072840102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
34
|
|
35
|
Huntley CC, Lyerly AD, Patterson MV. Isohemagglutinins in parasitic infections. JAMA 1969; 208:1145-8. [PMID: 4181217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
36
|
|
37
|
Huntley CC, Costas MC, Williams RC, Lyerly AD, Watson RG. Anti-gamma-globulin factors in visceral larva migrans. JAMA 1966; 197:552-6. [PMID: 4161623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|