Are Color Experiences the Same across the Visual Field?

It seems obvious to laypeople that neurotypical humans experience color equivalently across their entire visual field. To some neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers, though, this claim has been met with skepticism, as neurophysiological evidence indicates the mechanisms that support color perception degrade with eccentricity. However, the argument that this entails altered color experience in peripheral vision is not universally accepted. Here, we address whether color experience is essentially equivalent between central and peripheral vision. To assess this, we will obtain similarity relationships between color experiences across the visual field using both online and laboratory-based far-field displays, while removing the confounds of saccades, memory, and expectation about color experiences. Our experiment was designed to provide clear evidence that would favor either unchanged or altered color experience relationships in the periphery. Our results are consistent with lay people's phenomenological reports: Color experiences, as probed by similarity relationships in central vision and the far field (60°), are equivalent when elicited by large stimuli. These findings challenge the widespread view in philosophy and cognitive science that peripheral color experiences are illusory, and are discussed in the context of their related neurophysiological, psychophysical, and philosophical literature.

Environmental enrichment enhances cognitive flexibility in C57BL/6 mice on a touchscreen reversal learning task

Environmental enrichment (EE) is any positive modification of the 'standard housing' (SH) conditions in which laboratory animals are typically held, usually involving increased opportunity for cognitive stimulation and physical activity. EE has been reported to enhance baseline performance of wild-type animals on traditional cognitive behavioural tasks. Recently, touchscreen operant testing chambers have emerged as a way of performing rodent cognitive assays, providing greater reproducibility, translatability and automatability. Cognitive tests in touchscreen chambers are performed over numerous trials and thus experimenters have the power to detect subtle enhancements in performance. We used touchscreens to analyse the effects of EE on reversal learning, visual discrimination and hippocampal-dependent spatial pattern separation and working memory. We hypothesized that EE would enhance the performance of mice on cognitive touchscreen tasks. Our hypothesis was partially supported in that EE induced enhancements in cognitive flexibility as observed in visual discrimination and reversal learning improvements. However, no other significant effects of EE on cognitive performance were observed. EE decreased the activity level of mice in the touchscreen chambers, which may influence the enrichment level of the animals. Although we did not see enhancements on all hypothesized parameters, our testing paradigm is capable of detecting EE-induced improved cognitive flexibility in mice, which has implications for both understanding the mechanisms of EE and improving screening of putative cognitive-enhancing therapeutics.