1
|
Rousseau B, Bieche I, Pasmant E, Hamzaoui N, Leulliot N, Michon L, de Reynies A, Attignon V, Foote MB, Masliah-Planchon J, Svrcek M, Cohen R, Simmet V, Augereau P, Malka D, Hollebecque A, Pouessel D, Gomez-Roca C, Guimbaud R, Bruyas A, Guillet M, Grob JJ, Duluc M, Cousin S, de la Fouchardiere C, Flechon A, Rolland F, Hiret S, Saada-Bouzid E, Bouche O, Andre T, Pannier D, El Hajbi F, Oudard S, Tournigand C, Soria JC, Champiat S, Gerber DG, Stephens D, Lamendola-Essel MF, Maron SB, Diplas BH, Argiles G, Krishnan AR, Tabone-Eglinger S, Ferrari A, Segal NH, Cercek A, Hoog-Labouret N, Legrand F, Simon C, Lamrani-Ghaouti A, Diaz LA, Saintigny P, Chevret S, Marabelle A. PD-1 Blockade in Solid Tumors with Defects in Polymerase Epsilon. Cancer Discov 2022; 12:1435-1448. [PMID: 35398880 PMCID: PMC9167784 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Missense mutations in the polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene have been reported to generate proofreading defects resulting in an ultramutated genome and to sensitize tumors to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. However, many POLE-mutated tumors do not respond to such treatment. To better understand the link between POLE mutation variants and response to immunotherapy, we prospectively assessed the efficacy of nivolumab in a multicenter clinical trial in patients bearing advanced mismatch repair-proficient POLE-mutated solid tumors. We found that only tumors harboring selective POLE pathogenic mutations in the DNA binding or catalytic site of the exonuclease domain presented high mutational burden with a specific single-base substitution signature, high T-cell infiltrates, and a high response rate to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. This study illustrates how specific DNA repair defects sensitize to immunotherapy. POLE proofreading deficiency represents a novel agnostic biomarker for response to PD-1 checkpoint blockade therapy. SIGNIFICANCE POLE proofreading deficiency leads to high tumor mutational burden with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and predicts anti-PD-1 efficacy in mismatch repair-proficient tumors. Conversely, tumors harboring POLE mutations not affecting proofreading derived no benefit from PD-1 blockade. POLE proofreading deficiency is a new tissue-agnostic biomarker for cancer immunotherapy. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1397.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Rousseau
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ivan Bieche
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université de Paris, CARPEM, Paris, France
| | - Eric Pasmant
- Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université de Paris, CARPEM, Paris, France
- Fédération de Génétique et Médecine Génomique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP.Centre-Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Nadim Hamzaoui
- Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université de Paris, CARPEM, Paris, France
- Fédération de Génétique et Médecine Génomique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP.Centre-Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Leulliot
- Cibles Thérapeutiques et Conception de Médicaments, CNRS UMR8015, Université de Paris, UFR de Pharmacie de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Lucas Michon
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Aurelien de Reynies
- Université de Paris, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, UMRS1138, AP-HP, SeqOIA-IT, Paris, France
| | | | - Michael B. Foote
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Magali Svrcek
- Pathology department, Saint Antoine Hospital
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938 and SIRIC CURAMUS, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, Equipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, F-75012 Paris, France
| | - Romain Cohen
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938 and SIRIC CURAMUS, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, Equipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, F-75012 Paris, France
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Victor Simmet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest (ICO), Angers, France
| | - Paule Augereau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest (ICO), Angers, France
| | - David Malka
- Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et d’Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Antoine Hollebecque
- Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et d’Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud / IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Carlos Gomez-Roca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud / IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Amandine Bruyas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France
| | - Marielle Guillet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France
| | | | - Muriel Duluc
- Dermatology and Oncology, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Aude Flechon
- Department of medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Frederic Rolland
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l’Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Sandrine Hiret
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l’Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Esma Saada-Bouzid
- Medical Oncology, Centre Anticancer Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Olivier Bouche
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU de Reims - Hôpital Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | - Thierry Andre
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Stephane Oudard
- Oncology, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean-Charles Soria
- Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et d’Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Stephane Champiat
- Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et d’Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Drew G. Gerber
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dennis Stephens
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Steven B. Maron
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bill H. Diplas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Guillem Argiles
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Asha R. Krishnan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anthony Ferrari
- Platform of Bioinformatics Gilles Thomas-Synergie Lyon Cancer, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon
| | - Neil H. Segal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Frederic Legrand
- Research and Innovation, Institut National du Cancer, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | | | | | - Luis A. Diaz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pierre Saintigny
- Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Department of medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | | | - Aurelien Marabelle
- Département d’Innovation Thérapeutique et d’Essais Précoces (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- U1015 & CIC1428, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), Villejuif, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Krishnan AR, Wong G, Chapman JR, Coates PT, Russ GR, Pleass H, Russell C, He B, Lim WH. Prolonged Ischemic Time, Delayed Graft Function, and Graft and Patient Outcomes in Live Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:2714-23. [PMID: 27037866 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2015] [Revised: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The association between prolonged cold ischemic time (CIT) and graft and patient outcomes in live donor kidney transplant recipients remains unclear. The aims of this study were to examine the association of CIT with delayed graft function and graft loss in live donor kidney transplant recipients and those who participated in the Australian Paired Kidney Exchange program using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) registry. Of 3717 live donor transplant recipients between 1997 and 2012 who were followed for a median of 6.6 years (25 977 person-years), 224 (25%) experienced CIT >4-8 h. Donor age was an effect modifier between CIT and graft outcomes. In recipients who received kidneys from older donors aged >50 years, every hour of increase in CIT was associated with adjusted odds of 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.53, p = 0.007) for delayed graft function, whereas CIT >4-8 h was associated with adjusted hazards of 1.93 (95% CI 1.21-3.09, p = 0.006) and 1.91 (95% CI 1.05-3.49, p = 0.035) for overall and death-censored graft loss, respectively, compared with CIT of 1-2 h. Attempts to reduce CIT in live donor kidney transplants involving older donor kidneys may lead to improvement of graft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Krishnan
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia, Australia
| | - G Wong
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia, Australia.,Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - J R Chapman
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - P T Coates
- Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Services, South Australia, Australia
| | - G R Russ
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia, Australia.,Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Services, South Australia, Australia
| | - H Pleass
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - C Russell
- Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Services, South Australia, Australia
| | - B He
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia, Australia
| | - W H Lim
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia, Australia.,Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|