Lasofoxifene versus fulvestrant for ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation: results from the randomized, phase II ELAINE 1 trial

BACKGROUND

Acquired estrogen receptor alpha (ER/ESR1) mutations commonly cause endocrine resistance in ER+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Lasofoxifene, a novel selective ER modulator, stabilizes an antagonist conformation of wild-type and ESR1-mutated ER-ligand binding domains, and has antitumor activity in ESR1-mutated xenografts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, phase II, multicenter, ELAINE 1 study (NCT03781063), we randomized women with ESR1-mutated, ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) mBC that had progressed on an aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) to oral lasofoxifene 5 mg daily or IM fulvestrant 500 mg (days 1, 15, and 29, and then every 4 weeks) until disease progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were safety/tolerability.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients received lasofoxifene (n = 52) or fulvestrant (n = 51). The most current efficacy analysis showed that lasofoxifene did not significantly prolong median PFS compared with fulvestrant: 24.2 weeks (∼5.6 months) versus 16.2 weeks (∼3.7 months; P = 0.138); hazard ratio 0.699 (95% confidence interval 0.434-1.125). However, PFS and other clinical endpoints numerically favored lasofoxifene: clinical benefit rate (36.5% versus 21.6%; P = 0.117), objective response rate [13.2% (including a complete response in one lasofoxifene-treated patient) versus 2.9%; P = 0.124], and 6-month (53.4% versus 37.9%) and 12-month (30.7% versus 14.1%) PFS rates. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events with lasofoxifene were nausea, fatigue, arthralgia, and hot flushes. One death occurred in the fulvestrant arm. Circulating tumor DNA ESR1 mutant allele fraction (MAF) decreased from baseline to week 8 in 82.9% of evaluable lasofoxifene-treated versus 61.5% of fulvestrant-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lasofoxifene demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity versus fulvestrant and was well tolerated in patients with ESR1-mutated, endocrine-resistant mBC following progression on AI plus CDK4/6i. Consistent with target engagement, lasofoxifene reduced ESR1 MAF, and to a greater extent than fulvestrant. Lasofoxifene may be a promising targeted treatment for patients with ESR1-mutated mBC and warrants further investigation.

Abstract PD1-01: Trilaciclib (T), a CDK4/6 inhibitor, dosed with gemcitabine (G), carboplatin (C) in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients: Preliminary phase 2 results

Background: Cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced damage of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) results in acute toxicities consisting of multi-lineage myelosuppression, and late onset toxicities consisting of progressive bone marrow suppression with increased incidence of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. T is an IV CDK4/6 inhibitor in development to preserve HSPC and immune system function during cytotoxic chemotherapy (myelopreservation). Proof of concept for myelopreservation with T was observed in a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial in small-cell lung cancer patients receiving 1st-line chemotherapy. This trial in mTNBC patients (NCT02978716) was designed to explore the utility of T in combination with GC.

Methods: This Phase 2, randomized, open-label study enrolled patients in the US and EU with mTNBC who had received 0-2 prior systemic cytotoxic therapies in the locally recurrent or metastatic setting and had no symptomatic brain metastases. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to GC alone (Group 1) or T plus GC (Group 2) using a standard schedule (D1, 8 every 21 days) or to an alternative schedule (T on D1, 2, 8 and 9 with GC on D2 and 9 every 21 days; Group 3). On those days when both T and GC were scheduled, T was administered iv prior to GC infusion. Prophylactic growth factors were not administered in cycle 1; otherwise supportive care was allowed as needed. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability; tumor response was evaluated using RECIST v1.1 and PFS and OS were assessed. Myelopreservation endpoints reflecting the potential effects of T on multiple cellular lineages include occurrence of Grade 4 neutropenia (primary), RBC and platelet transfusions (primary), and lymphocyte counts with immune profiling (secondary and exploratory). A signature of CDK4/6 independence developed from preclinical data will be used to evaluate archival tumor tissue samples and data analysis is ongoing.

Results: 95 patients were dosed; median age 57 years (range 32,86), ECOG PS 0 (53%) or 1 (47%), 25% had liver metastases at baseline, and approximately 50% had received no systemic therapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting. Fifty-five patients remain on treatment. Disease progression was the most common reason for drug discontinuation (22/40; 55%). Overall the most common (≥ 25%) TEAEs were anemia (47%), nausea (35%), fatigue (34%), neutropenia (32%), platelet count decreased (25%), and vomiting (25%). The most frequent (≥ 15%) Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs were hematologic toxicities, i.e. neutropenia (28%), anemia (21%), neutrophil count decreased (21%) and thrombocytopenia (16%). These were also the most frequent drug-related TEAEs observed. Tumor efficacy data are being evaluated.

Conclusions: This trial, assessing the myelopreservation effects of T when combined with GC in patients with mTNBC, has completed enrollment. Myelopreservation data, immune profiling, as well as ORR and preliminary PFS results will be presented by study arm at the meeting.

Citation Format: O'Shaughnessy J, Wright GS, Thummala AR, Danso MA, Popovic L, Pluard TJ, Cheung E, Han HS, Daniel BR, Vojnovic Z, Vasev N, Ling M, Richards DA, Wilks ST, Milenkovic D, Sorrentino JA, Roberts PJ, Bomar M, Yang Z, Antal JM, Malik RK, Morris SR, Tan A. Trilaciclib (T), a CDK4/6 inhibitor, dosed with gemcitabine (G), carboplatin (C) in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients: Preliminary phase 2 results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-01.

Abstract P1-12-04: A phase 2 study of eribulin in breast cancer not achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)

Background: Residual breast cancer after NAC is associated with a high risk of recurrence. Little evidence supports the use of further chemotherapy in this setting. Eribulin, an inhibitor of microtubule dynamics, demonstrated a survival advantage in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had progressed after previous anthracycline and taxane therapy. This phase 2 trial assessed the efficacy of eribulin (2-yr disease-free survival) administered postoperatively to breast cancer pts not achieving a pCR following standard NAC.

Methods: Women with invasive breast cancer (stage T1-4b, N0-2, M0 at diagnosis) and evidence of residual cancer (>5 mm) in the breast or axillary lymph nodes (LN) following ≥4 cycles of standard anthracycline and/or taxane-containing NAC were eligible. Additional eligibility criteria: age ≥18 yrs, peripheral neuropathy < 1, adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. 3 groups were studied: Cohort A-triple negative (TN), Cohort B-HR+/HER2-, Cohort C-HER2+. After recovery from definitive surgery, all pts received eribulin mesylate 1.4mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for 6 cycles. Cohort C pts also received trastuzumab 6mg/kg IV day 1 every 21 days for a total of 1 yr from start of NAC. Adjuvant hormonal therapy and loco-regional radiotherapy were administered per institutional guidelines. We hypothesized post-operative eribulin would result in a 40% increase over the reported 40% 2 yr DFS for TN, and a 15% increase over the reported 80% 2 yr DFS for HR+/HER2- pts who did not achieve pCR following standard NAC.

Results: 127 pts were enrolled (54, Cohort A; 42, Cohort B; 31, Cohort C). Pts on Cohort C continue with study treatment. Here, we present the results of 95 pts treated on Cohorts A and B. Median age-52 yrs (range, 27-74). 87 pts (92%) had invasive ductal adenocarcinoma, 6 (6%) invasive lobular, 1 (1%) mucinous, and 1 (1 %) unknown; 34 pts (36%) had T3 or T4 tumors and 65 (68%) had N1-2 disease at diagnosis. NAC with anthracyclines was administered to 74 pts (78%), taxanes to 88 (93%), and 72 (76%) received both. 71 pts (75%) had mastectomies, 24 (25%) had breast conserving surgery. Median residual tumor was 17.5 mm (range 0.1 to 80); 60 pts (63%) were LN+. 78 pts (81%) completed the planned 6 cycles of eribulin. Adjuvant radiation was administered in 28 pts (30%). 3 pts discontinued treatment due to toxicity (1 each with G3 neutropenia, G3 nausea, and unknown grade neuropathy). The most common treatment-related G3/4 adverse events were neutropenia [29 pts (31%)] and leukopenia [10 pts (11%)]. 3 pts (3%) had G3/4 febrile neutropenia and 2 pts (2%) had G3/4 neuropathy. Growth factors were administered to 22 pts (24%). There were no treatment-related deaths. With a median follow up of 19.2 and 14.9 months for Cohorts A and B respectively, the 2 yr DFS probabilities calculated from date of surgery were 61.1 % (95% CI-41.2-76.0) for Cohort A; 82.2% (95% CI-60.2-92.7) for Cohort B.

Conclusions: The addition of eribulin is safe and feasible in pts who do not achieve pCR following anthracycline and/or taxane based NAC. At a median follow up of 19.2 months, a statistically significant improvement in the estimated 2 yr DFS was evident in the TN (Cohort A) pts.

Citation Format: Yardley DA, Peacock N, Shroff S, Molthrop, Jr DC, Anz B, Daniel BR, Young RR, Weaver R, Harwin W, Webb CD, Ward P, Shastry M, DeBusk LM, Midha R, Hainsworth JD, Burris III HA. A phase 2 study of eribulin in breast cancer not achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-04.

Abstract OT1-03-15: The METRIC trial: A randomized international study of the antibody-drug conjugate glembatumumab vedotin (GV or CDX-011) in patients with metastatic gpNMB-overexpressing triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Background

Glycoprotein NMB (gpNMB) is an internalizable transmembrane protein overexpressed in approximately 20% of breast cancer (BC), including approximately 40% of TNBC. gpNMB is a poor prognostic marker in BC (Rose CCR 2010) and preclinically has been implicated in tumor invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. GV is a novel antibody-drug conjugate targeting the potent cytotoxin monomethylauristatin E (MMAE) to gpNMB overexpressing cancer cells.

In a Phase I/II study and the Phase II "EMERGE" study, GV demonstrated promising activity with TNBC patients (pts) deriving the greatest benefit and exhibiting the highest degree of gpNMB overexpression. GV was well-tolerated with the most frequent treatment-related toxicities consisting of rash, neutropenia, and neuropathy. In subset analyses of the EMERGE trial, objective response rate (ORR) was 30% (7/23) for GV vs. 9% (1/11) for investigator's choice in tumors with gpNMB overexpression (>25% of tumor epithelium); 18% (5/28) vs. 0% (0/11) in TNBC; and 40% (4/10) vs. 0% (0/6) in gpNMB-overexpressing TNBC for GV and IC respectively, with apparent improvements in progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.11) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.14).

Trial design

The METRIC Trial (NCT#01997333) is an international (USA, CA, Aus), two-arm phase II study. Pts are randomized 2:1 to GV (1.88 mg/kg IV q 21 days) or capecitabine, a current standard of care for this population (2,500 mg/m2 daily for d1-14, q21 days) until progression or intolerance. Crossover is not permitted.

Eligibility criteria

Key eligibility criteria include: >25% of tumor epithelium gpNMB+ by central immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening of archival tissue; estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor <10% and HER2 negative [0-1+ IHC, or ISH copy number <4.0/ratio <2.0] by local assessment; ECOG 0-1; taxane resistance; anthracycline exposure (if indicated); <2 chemotherapy regimens for advanced BC; measurable disease; no persistent Grade >2 toxicity.

Specific aims

The primary endpoint is PFS per independent, blinded central review committee according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints are ORR, duration of response, OS, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Exploratory endpoints are quality of life and/or cancer-related pain.

Statistical methods and target accrual

The trial has 85% power to detect a PFS HR of 0.64 with two sided α = 0.05. The hypothesized median PFS is 4.0 months for capecitabine and 6.25 months for GV. Target accrual is open for 300 pts.

Citation Format: Melisko M, Yardley DA, Blackwell K, Forero A, Ma C, Montero A, Daniel BR, Wright G, Fehrenbacher L, Chew H, Ferrario C, Nanda R, Seiler Jr M, Guthrie T, Vance K, Ouellette G, He Y, Bagley RG, Zhang J, Vahdat LT. The METRIC trial: A randomized international study of the antibody-drug conjugate glembatumumab vedotin (GV or CDX-011) in patients with metastatic gpNMB-overexpressing triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-15.

OT3-01-11: A Randomized, Phase II Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Evaluating MetMAb and/or Bevacizumab in Combination with Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background

Dysregulation of the HGF/Met pathway has been associated with tumorigenesis in many malignancies, including the basal sub-type of triple-negative breast cancer. MetMAb (RG3638) is a recombinant, humanized, monovalent monoclonal antibody directed against Met. By binding to the extracellular domain of Met, MetMAb selectively blocks ligand binding and subsequent activation by HGF. Pre-clinical data support the efficacy of combining MetMAb with numerous chemotherapy agents and with targeted agents including bevacizumab and erlotinib. In clinic, MetMAb has been generally well tolerated as a single agent (Phase I), in combination with bevacizumab (Phase Ib) and with bevacizumab in a dose escalation/expansion study (Phase Ib)1 as well as in combination with erlotinib in patients with previously treated NSCLC2. The combination of MetMAb + erlotinib in NSCLC demonstrated significant benefit in both PFS and OS in patients with Met diagnostic positive tumors whereas those patients with Met diagnostic negative tumors demonstrated a detrimental effect in both PFS and OS. The most commonly reported adverse events associated with MetMAb are peripheral edema and fatigue.

Methods: This clinical trial is a randomized three-arm Phase II study in patients with triple-negative metastatic breast cancer, which makes up the majority of basal sub-type breast cancer. Patients will be randomized (1:1:1) to either paclitaxel + bevacizumab + placebo; paclitaxel + placebo + MetMAb; or paclitaxel + bevacizumab + MetMAb. The primary endpoint of this study is PFS in all patients and by Met diagnostic status. Secondary endpoints include an evaluation of OS, ORR, safety, and pharmacokinetics. To date, 11 patients have been enrolled, and 10 patients have been treated.

Primary and secondary analyses will include all randomized patients, with patients analyzed according to the treatment arm to which they were assigned. Kaplan-Meier methodology will be used to estimate the median PFS for each treatment arm. An estimate of the HR with 95% CI will be determined using a Cox regression model with an indicator variable for the MetMAb-containing arm. Safety will be assessed through summaries of adverse events and will include all patients who receive any amount of study treatment.

This study remains open for accrual; further details on the trial can be found on the ClinicalTrials.gov website under NCT01186991.

1. Moss et al, In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2–6; Orlando, FL; AACR 2011 (abstr 4717).

2. Spigel et al, J Clin Oncol 29:2011 (suppl; abstr 7505).

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-11.

Biweekly neoadjuvant gemcitabine, epirubicin, and nano-particle albumin bound (nab) paclitaxel (GEA) with tumor SPARC analysis correlated with pathologic responses: Results of a multicenter phase II trial

11060

Background: The triplet combination of gemcitabine (G), anthracyclines and taxanes have demonstrated significant activity in the metastatic as well as neoadjuvant breast cancer setting with objective response rates of 90% and pathologic CRs of 20–25% with a variety of schedules. SPARC, a poor prognostic indicator, is a glycoprotein expressed in many solid tumors, including breast cancer, and is thought to mediate active tumor transport of nab paclitaxel resulting in high intratumoral concentrations. The present tumor analysis correlates SPARC expression with pathologic responses to neoadjuvant GEA. Methods: Patients with clinical T1c-T4d and/or N0–3, M0 (T1N0M0 excluded) breast cancer, chemo naive, ECOG PS 0–2, normal LVEF, adequate organ function were treated with neoadjuvant G 2000 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, nab paclitaxel (A)175 mg/m2 IV q14 x 6 cycles followed by surgery. Postoperative therapy: G 2000 mg/m2 and A 220 mg/m2 q14 x 4 cycles. Neulasta 6 mg sc D2 was given with all cycles although alternative granulocyte stimulating factors was permitted. Enrollment planned for 120 pts. Results: 72 pts are enrolled, 48 patients evaluable for toxicityand pathologic responses available for 35 pts. Median age: 48 years (29–73), ECOG PS 0 - 45 pts (96%), 1 - 3 (6%), median tumor size 4.5 cm, 79% ductal, 4% lobular, 13% inflammatory. 54% ER-/PR-, 81% HER2 negative. 21 (60%) were triple negative, basal subtype. Heme toxicity was minimal: G3/4 neutropenia: 4 (8%) pts, thrombocytopenia: 3 (6%) pts. There were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Nonheme toxicity significant for G3/4 arthraglias: 5 (10%) pts & fatigue in 3 (6%) pts. 3 pts hospitalized (infection, PE, abd pain). 1 pt developed PD during neoadjuvant therapy; 5 pts did not complete post op chemo (pt compliance: 2, PD: 2, MD discretion: 1). pCR was noted in both breast and LNs in 7 pts (20%) and pPR in 26 (74%). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant dose dense GEA is feasible and extremely well tolerated. Significant activity with a pCR of 20% is evident with the basal subtype of breast cancer. SPARC tumor analysis correlations with observed pathologic responses will be presented and updated with the continuing accrual to this trial.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.