1
|
Watson F, Wilks S, Keevil CW, Chewins J. Modelling hospital disinfectant against multi-drug-resistant dry surface biofilms grown under artificial human sweat. J Hosp Infect 2023; 141:190-197. [PMID: 37343768 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dry surface biofilms (DSBs) have been found abundantly across hospital surfaces within intensive care units and may explain how nosocomial pathogens can remain virulent and persist on surfaces for extended periods. Testing standards governing the performance of disinfectant products employ planktonic models under routine growth conditions, which are known to be less tolerant than their biofilm counterpart. AIM To evaluate biofilm models cultured under artificial human sweat (AHS), a source of nutrient expected on touch surfaces, to assess the antimicrobial performance of common cleaning agents, including a quaternary ammonium, hydrogen peroxide and active chlorine. METHODS Five single-species biofilms, using pathogenic bacteria such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis, were generated on stainless-steel substrates using a sedimentation protocol under both AHS and nutrient-rich conditions for a direct comparison of phenotypic tolerance. The biofilm models were grown over five days followed by desiccation cycles, before being submerged into the disinfectant solutions for up to 25 min. Epifluorescence (EF) microscopy using LIVE/DEAD™ stain was used to visualize microcolony viability. FINDINGS The results revealed biofilms cultured under AHS exhibited a greater antimicrobial tolerance and reduced speed of kill for all cleaning agents compared with the routine media; an average reduction of 72.4% vs 96.9%, respectively. EF microscopy revealed traces of viable bacteria across all coupons after disinfection indicating a potential opportunity for regrowth and recontamination. CONCLUSION The notable difference in biocidal performance between the two growth conditions highlights potential pitfalls within current antimicrobial test standards, and the importance of accurate representation of the microbial challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Watson
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Bioquell UK Ltd, Andover, UK
| | - S Wilks
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - C W Keevil
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Watson F, Chewins J, Wilks S, Keevil B. An automated contact model for transmission of dry surface biofilms of Acinetobacter baumannii in healthcare. J Hosp Infect 2023; 141:175-183. [PMID: 37348564 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dry surface biofilms (DSBs) have been recognized across environmental and equipment surfaces in hospitals and could explain how microbial contamination can survive for an extended period and may play a key role in the transmission of hospital-acquired infections. Despite little being known on how they form and proliferate in clinical settings, DSB models for disinfectant efficacy testing exist. AIM In this study we develop a novel biofilm model to represent formation within hospitals, by emulating patient to surface interactions. METHODS The model generates a DSB through the transmission of artificial human sweat (AHS) and clinically relevant pathogens using a synthetic thumb capable of emulating human contact. The DNA, glycoconjugates and protein composition of the model biofilm, along with structural features of the micro-colonies was determined using fluorescent stains visualized by epifluorescence microscopy and compared with published clinical data. RESULTS Micrographs revealed the heterogeneity of the biofilm across the surface; and reveal protein as the principal component within the matrix, followed by glycoconjugates and DNA. The model repeatably transferred trace amounts of micro-organisms and AHS, every 5 min for up to 120 h on to stainless-steel coupons to generate a biofilm model averaging 1.16 × 103 cfu/cm2 falling within the reported range for clinical DSB (4.20 × 102 to 1.60 × 107 bacteria/cm2). CONCLUSION Our in vitro DSB model exhibits many phenotypical characteristics and traits to those reported in situ. The model highlights key features often overlooked and the potential for downstream applications such as antibiofilm claims using more realistic microbial challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Watson
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Bioquell UK Ltd, Andover, UK.
| | | | - S Wilks
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - B Keevil
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Rossem MT, Wilks S, Secor PR, Kaczmarek M, D’Alessandro G. Homogenization modelling of antibiotic diffusion and adsorption in viral liquid crystals. R Soc Open Sci 2023; 10:221120. [PMID: 36636312 PMCID: PMC9810422 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.221120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Systems of rod-shaped viruses have long been important to the science of living liquid crystals, as their monodispersity and uniform charge make them convenient model systems. Recently, it was shown that, upon the addition of polymers, suspensions of rod-shaped viruses form liquid crystals that are linked with increased tolerance of bacteria against antibiotics. We use homogenization to obtain effective equations describing antibiotic diffusion through these liquid crystals. The analytical results of homogenization are compared with numerical results from an exact microscopic model, showing good agreement and thus allowing us to identify the key parameters behind the process. Our modelling shows that the adsorption plays a key role in increasing antibiotic diffusion time and therefore the presence of nematic rod-shaped viruses may increase antibiotic tolerance through physical mechanisms alone. These results demonstrate the applicability of homogenization as an analytical tool to systems of liquid crystalline viruses, with relatively straightforward extension to more complex problems such as liquid crystalline biofilms, other biological liquid crystals and biological systems with different types of local structural order.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. T. van Rossem
- Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - S. Wilks
- Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - P. R. Secor
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
| | - M. Kaczmarek
- Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - G. D’Alessandro
- Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Shaughnessy J, Sousa S, Cruz J, Fallowfield L, Auvinen P, Pulido C, Cvetanovic A, Wilks S, Ribeiro L, Burotto M, Klingbiel D, Messeri D, Alexandrou A, Trask P, Fredriksson J, Machackova Z, Stamatovic L. 165MO Patient (pt) preference for the pertuzumab-trastuzumab fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous use (PH FDC SC) in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC): Primary analysis of the open-label, randomised crossover PHranceSCa study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
5
|
O'Shaughnessy J, Sousa S, Cruz J, Fallowfield L, Auvinen P, Pulido C, Cvetanovic A, Wilks S, Ribeiro L, Burotto M, Klingbiel D, Messeri D, Alexandrou A, Trask P, Fredriksson J, Stamatovic L. 80O Patient (pt) preference and satisfaction with the subcutaneous fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab (P) and trastuzumab (H) in pts with HER2-positive early breast cancer (HER2+ eBC): Interim analysis of the open-label, randomised cross-over PHranceSCa study. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
6
|
Le Pape S, Divol L, Huser G, Katz J, Kemp A, Ross JS, Wallace R, Wilks S. Plasma Collision in a Gas Atmosphere. Phys Rev Lett 2020; 124:025003. [PMID: 32004037 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.025003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
We present a study on the impact of a gas atmosphere on the collision of two counterpropagating plasmas (gold and carbon). Imaging optical Thomson scattering data of the plasma collision with and without helium in between have been obtained at the Omega laser facility. Without gas, we observed large scale mixing of colliding gold and carbon ions. Once ambient helium is added, the two plasmas remain separated. The difference in ionic temperature is consistent with a reduction of the maximum Mach number of the flow from M=7 to M=4. It results in a reduction of a factor ∼10 of the counterstreaming ion-ion mean free path. By adding a low-density ambient gas, it is possible to control the collision of two high-velocity counterstreaming plasma, transitioning from an interpenetrating regime to a regime in agreement with a hydrodynamic description.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Le Pape
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
- LULI-CNRS École Polytechnique, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Sorbonne Universités, F-91128 Palaiseau cedex, France
| | - L Divol
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - G Huser
- CEA, DAM, DIF, Bruyeres-le-Chatel, F-91297 Arpajon, France
| | - J Katz
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, 250 East River Road, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - A Kemp
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - J S Ross
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - R Wallace
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - S Wilks
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yardley DA, Coleman R, Conte P, Cortes J, Brufsky A, Shtivelband M, Young R, Bengala C, Ali H, Eakel J, Schneeweiss A, de la Cruz-Merino L, Wilks S, O'Shaughnessy J, Glück S, Li H, Miller J, Barton D, Harbeck N. nab-Paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line treatment of patients with triple-negative metastatic breast cancer: results from the tnAcity trial. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1763-1770. [PMID: 29878040 PMCID: PMC6096741 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) has a poor prognosis and aggressive clinical course. tnAcity evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin (nab-P/C), nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G), and gemcitabine plus carboplatin (G/C) in patients with mTNBC. Patients and methods Patients with pathologically confirmed mTNBC and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic BC received (1 : 1 : 1) nab-P 125 mg/m2 plus C AUC 2, nab-P 125 mg/m2 plus G 1000 mg/m2, or G 1000 mg/m2 plus C AUC 2, all on days 1, 8 q3w. Phase II primary end point: investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), percentage of patients initiating cycle 6 with doublet therapy, and safety. Results In total, 191 patients were enrolled (nab-P/C, n = 64; nab-P/G, n = 61; G/C, n = 66). PFS was significantly longer with nab-P/C versus nab-P/G [median, 8.3 versus 5.5 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.59 [95% CI, 0.38-0.92]; P = 0.02] or G/C (median, 8.3 versus 6.0 months; HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.37-0.90]; P = 0.02). OS was numerically longer with nab-P/C versus nab-P/G (median, 16.8 versus 12.1 months; HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.47-1.13]; P = 0.16) or G/C (median, 16.8 versus 12.6 months; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.52-1.22]; P = 0.29). ORR was 73%, 39%, and 44%, respectively. In the nab-P/C, nab-P/G, and G/C groups, 64%, 56%, and 50% of patients initiated cycle 6 with a doublet. Grade ≥3 adverse events were mainly hematologic. Conclusions First-line nab-P/C was active in mTNBC and resulted in a significantly longer PFS and improved risk/benefit profile versus nab-P/G or G/C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Medical Oncology, Nashville, USA.
| | - R Coleman
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - P Conte
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova and Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova, Italy
| | - J Cortes
- Medical Oncology, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Brufsky
- Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - M Shtivelband
- Medical Oncology, Ironwood Physicians, PC, Chandler, USA
| | - R Young
- Medical Oncology, The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Fort Worth, USA
| | - C Bengala
- Medical Oncology, Misericordia General Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - H Ali
- Medical Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA
| | - J Eakel
- Hematology and Oncology, Florida Cancer Specialists, Sarasota, USA
| | - A Schneeweiss
- Gynecology and Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - S Wilks
- Hematology and Medical Oncology, Texas Oncology, San Antonio, USA
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Hematology, Medical Oncology, Baylor Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, USA
| | - S Glück
- GMA Early Assets, Celgene Corporation, Summit, USA
| | - H Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Celgene Corporation, Summit, USA
| | - J Miller
- Clinical Research and Development, Hematology/Oncology, Celgene Corporation, Summit, USA
| | - D Barton
- Clinical Research and Development, Hematology/Oncology, Celgene Corporation, Summit, USA
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Cancer Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hua R, Kim J, Sherlock M, Bailly-Grandvaux M, Beg FN, McGuffey C, Wilks S, Wen H, Joglekar A, Mori W, Ping Y. Self-Generated Magnetic and Electric Fields at a Mach-6 Shock Front in a Low Density Helium Gas by Dual-Angle Proton Radiography. Phys Rev Lett 2019; 123:215001. [PMID: 31809125 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.123.215001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Shocks are abundant both in astrophysical and laboratory systems. While the electric fields generated at shock fronts have recently attracted great attention, the associated self-generated magnetic field is rarely studied, despite its ability to significantly affect the shock profile in the nonideal geometry where density and temperature gradients are not parallel. We report here the observation of a magnetic field at the front of a Mach ∼6 shock propagating in a low-density helium gas system. Proton radiography from different projection angles not only confirms the magnetic field's existence, but also provides a quantitative measurement of the field strength in the range ∼5 to 7 T. X-ray spectrometry allowed inference of the density and temperature at the shock front, constraining the plasma conditions under which the magnetic and electric fields are generated. Simulations with the particle-in-cell code lsp attribute the self-generation of the magnetic field to the Biermann battery effect (∇n_{e}×∇T_{e}).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hua
- Center for Energy Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - J Kim
- Center for Energy Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - M Sherlock
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - M Bailly-Grandvaux
- Center for Energy Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - F N Beg
- Center for Energy Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - C McGuffey
- Center for Energy Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | - S Wilks
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - H Wen
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
| | - A Joglekar
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
| | - W Mori
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
| | - Y Ping
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O’Shaughnessy J, Wright G, Thummala A, Danso M, Popovic L, Pluard T, Han H, Vojnovic Z, Vasev N, Ma L, Richards D, Wilks S, Milenkovic D, Sorrentino J, Yang Z, Horton J, Tan A. Trilaciclib improves overall survival when given with gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in a randomized phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz394.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
10
|
O'Shaughnessy J, Wright GS, Thummala AR, Danso MA, Popovic L, Pluard TJ, Cheung E, Han HS, Daniel BR, Vojnovic Z, Vasev N, Ling M, Richards DA, Wilks ST, Milenkovic D, Sorrentino JA, Roberts PJ, Bomar M, Yang Z, Antal JM, Malik RK, Morris SR, Tan A. Abstract PD1-01: Trilaciclib (T), a CDK4/6 inhibitor, dosed with gemcitabine (G), carboplatin (C) in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients: Preliminary phase 2 results. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-pd1-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced damage of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) results in acute toxicities consisting of multi-lineage myelosuppression, and late onset toxicities consisting of progressive bone marrow suppression with increased incidence of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. T is an IV CDK4/6 inhibitor in development to preserve HSPC and immune system function during cytotoxic chemotherapy (myelopreservation). Proof of concept for myelopreservation with T was observed in a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial in small-cell lung cancer patients receiving 1st-line chemotherapy. This trial in mTNBC patients (NCT02978716) was designed to explore the utility of T in combination with GC.
Methods: This Phase 2, randomized, open-label study enrolled patients in the US and EU with mTNBC who had received 0-2 prior systemic cytotoxic therapies in the locally recurrent or metastatic setting and had no symptomatic brain metastases. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to GC alone (Group 1) or T plus GC (Group 2) using a standard schedule (D1, 8 every 21 days) or to an alternative schedule (T on D1, 2, 8 and 9 with GC on D2 and 9 every 21 days; Group 3). On those days when both T and GC were scheduled, T was administered iv prior to GC infusion. Prophylactic growth factors were not administered in cycle 1; otherwise supportive care was allowed as needed. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability; tumor response was evaluated using RECIST v1.1 and PFS and OS were assessed. Myelopreservation endpoints reflecting the potential effects of T on multiple cellular lineages include occurrence of Grade 4 neutropenia (primary), RBC and platelet transfusions (primary), and lymphocyte counts with immune profiling (secondary and exploratory). A signature of CDK4/6 independence developed from preclinical data will be used to evaluate archival tumor tissue samples and data analysis is ongoing.
Results: 95 patients were dosed; median age 57 years (range 32,86), ECOG PS 0 (53%) or 1 (47%), 25% had liver metastases at baseline, and approximately 50% had received no systemic therapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting. Fifty-five patients remain on treatment. Disease progression was the most common reason for drug discontinuation (22/40; 55%). Overall the most common (≥ 25%) TEAEs were anemia (47%), nausea (35%), fatigue (34%), neutropenia (32%), platelet count decreased (25%), and vomiting (25%). The most frequent (≥ 15%) Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs were hematologic toxicities, i.e. neutropenia (28%), anemia (21%), neutrophil count decreased (21%) and thrombocytopenia (16%). These were also the most frequent drug-related TEAEs observed. Tumor efficacy data are being evaluated.
Conclusions: This trial, assessing the myelopreservation effects of T when combined with GC in patients with mTNBC, has completed enrollment. Myelopreservation data, immune profiling, as well as ORR and preliminary PFS results will be presented by study arm at the meeting.
Citation Format: O'Shaughnessy J, Wright GS, Thummala AR, Danso MA, Popovic L, Pluard TJ, Cheung E, Han HS, Daniel BR, Vojnovic Z, Vasev N, Ling M, Richards DA, Wilks ST, Milenkovic D, Sorrentino JA, Roberts PJ, Bomar M, Yang Z, Antal JM, Malik RK, Morris SR, Tan A. Trilaciclib (T), a CDK4/6 inhibitor, dosed with gemcitabine (G), carboplatin (C) in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients: Preliminary phase 2 results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J O'Shaughnessy
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - GS Wright
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - AR Thummala
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - MA Danso
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - L Popovic
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - TJ Pluard
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - E Cheung
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - HS Han
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - BR Daniel
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - Z Vojnovic
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - N Vasev
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - M Ling
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - DA Richards
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - ST Wilks
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - D Milenkovic
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - JA Sorrentino
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - PJ Roberts
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - M Bomar
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - Z Yang
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - JM Antal
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - RK Malik
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - SR Morris
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - A Tan
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Geiger J, Wilks S. PREDICTING HOSPITAL AND NURSING FACILITY ADMISSIONS AMONG NONINSTITUTIONALIZED OLDER ADULTS. Innov Aging 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igy023.1189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
12
|
Bardia A, Kabos P, Wilks S, Richards D, Harb W, Elledge R, Wang D, Jiang H, Garner F, O'Neill A, Kaklamani V. Abstract PD5-08: Not presented. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd5-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was not presented at the symposium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| | - P Kabos
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| | - S Wilks
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| | - D Richards
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| | - W Harb
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| | - R Elledge
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| | - D Wang
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| | - H Jiang
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| | - F Garner
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| | - A O'Neill
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| | - V Kaklamani
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Tyler, TX; Horizon Oncology Center, Lafayette, IN; CTRC, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; Radius Health Inc, Waltham, MA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Modi S, Pusztai L, Forero A, Mita M, Miller KD, Weise A, Krop I, Burris H, Kalinsky K, Tsai M, Liu MC, Hurvitz SA, Wilks S, Ademuyiwa F, Diab S, Han HS, Kato G, Nanda R, O'Shaughnessy J, Kostic A, Li M, Specht J. Abstract PD3-14: Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd3-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
LIV-1, a transmembrane protein and downstream target of STAT3, is highly expressed in breast cancer cells. It is associated with lymph node involvement and metastatic progression. SGN-LIV1A is an anti-LIV-1 antibody conjugated via a protease-cleavable linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Upon binding to cell-surface LIV-1, SGN-LIV1A is internalized and releases MMAE, which disrupts microtubulin and induces apoptosis.
Methods
This ongoing, phase 1 study evaluates safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-LIV1A (q3wks IV) in women with LIV-1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC) (NCT01969643). Patients (pts) with measurable disease and ≥2 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC are eligible. Pts with ≥ Grade 2 neuropathy are excluded. Response is assessed per RECIST v1.1; pts with stable disease (SD) or better can continue treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. At completion of dose escalation in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) and triple-negative (TN) pts, expansion cohorts were opened to further evaluate safety and antitumor activity of monotherapy in TN pts. Tumor biopsies are evaluated for LIV-1 expression.
Results
To date, 69 pts (18 HR+/HER2–, 51 TN) have received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1–12) of SGN-LIV1A at doses of 0.5–2.8 mg/kg. Median age was 56 yrs. Pts had a median of 3 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC; 58 had visceral disease and 37 had bone metastases. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 19 DLT-evaluable pts; maximum tolerated dose was not exceeded at 2.8 mg/kg. Expansion cohorts of TN pts were opened at 2.0 and 2.5 mg/kg. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥25% of pts were fatigue (59%), nausea (51%), peripheral neuropathy (44%), alopecia (36%), decreased appetite (33%), constipation (30%), abdominal pain, diarrhea, and neutropenia (25% each). Most AEs were Grade 1/2; AEs ≥ Grade 3 included neutropenia (25%) and anemia (15%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 2 pts whose total dose exceeded 200 mg per cycle, including 1 treatment-related death due to sepsis. No other treatment-related deaths occurred on-study. Seven pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. In dose escalation, activity was observed in 17 efficacy evaluable (EE) HR+/HER2- pts, with a disease control rate (DCR= CR+PR+SD) of 59% (10 SD), including 1 pt with SD ≥24 wks. Among the 44 EE TN pts (dose escalation plus expansion cohorts), the objective response rate (ORR) was 32% (14 PR) with a confirmed PR rate of 21%, DCR was 64% (14 PR, 14 SD), and clinical benefit rate (CBR=CR+PR+SD ≥24 wks) was 36% (16 pts). For TN pts, median PFS was 11.3 wks (95% CI: 6.1, 17.1); 10 pts remain on treatment.
Of 631 MBC tumor samples of all clinical subtypes evaluated for LIV-1, 91% were positive; 75% had moderate-to-high expression (H-score ≥100).
Conclusions
LIV-1 is expressed in almost all MBC tumors. SGN-LIV1A monotherapy was generally well tolerated and showed encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated TN MBC, with a PR rate of 32%, confirmed PR rate of 21%, and CBR (≥24 wks) of 36%. Response duration data continue to evolve. Enrollment continues in the TN monotherapy expansion cohort.
Citation Format: Modi S, Pusztai L, Forero A, Mita M, Miller KD, Weise A, Krop I, Burris III H, Kalinsky K, Tsai M, Liu MC, Hurvitz SA, Wilks S, Ademuyiwa F, Diab S, Han HS, Kato G, Nanda R, O'Shaughnessy J, Kostic A, Li M, Specht J. Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated triple-negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - L Pusztai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Forero
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Mita
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - KD Miller
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Weise
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - I Krop
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - H Burris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - K Kalinsky
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Tsai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - MC Liu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - SA Hurvitz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - S Wilks
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - F Ademuyiwa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - S Diab
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - HS Han
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - G Kato
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - R Nanda
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Kostic
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - J Specht
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tripathy D, Bardia A, Blum JL, Rocque G, Wilks S, Lakhanpal S, Migas J, Cappelleri J, Perkins J, Comstock G, Wang Y. Abstract OT3-05-03: POLARIS: Palbociclib (P) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer: A prospective multicenter noninterventional study. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-ot3-05-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: P is a novel cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor approved in the United States and Canada in combination with endocrine therapy for HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Despite promising trial results, not all patients respond to P. Moreover, despite a median age at diagnosis of 62 years, elderly patients are underrepresented in targeted therapy trials, including the PALOMA studies assessing P. It is important to understand P use in real-world practice settings, including tolerability and outcomes in the vulnerable older population. In addition, understanding the mechanisms of P response or resistance is critical to identify clinical factors and biomarkers that can predict which patients will benefit from P. This multicenter observational and biomarker study will seek to address these and other data gaps.
Trial Design: This is a prospective, noninterventional study of 1500 patients treated with P from 100 US and 10 Canadian sites. Study duration will span 2 years of recruitment and 3 years of follow-up after P treatment, until patient withdrawal from the study or death. Study participation is not intended to alter routine treatment; all treatment decisions, including type and timing of disease monitoring, are at the discretion of the treating physician and patient.
Eligibility: Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the breast with (1) evidence of advanced or metastatic disease not amenable to treatment with curative intent, (2) documented HR+/HER2- status, and (3) planned treatment with P. Patients with a life expectancy <3 months at initial diagnosis, those participating in interventional trials, and those receiving active treatment for malignancies other than ABC at enrollment are ineligible.
Aims: In a large real-world cohort of HR+/HER2- ABC patients treated with P in routine clinical practice, this study aims to assess the following: prescribing and treatment patterns for ABC before, during, and after P therapy; overall clinical response to P; biomarker assessment investigating potential mechanisms of response and resistance to P based on genomic analyses of blood samples; patient quality of life, as measured by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30; geriatric assessments in patients aged ≥70 years at enrollment based on the G8 Geriatric Screening Tool and the Activities of Daily Living questionnaire; and sequencing of treatment for metastatic disease. Other outcomes to be assessed include survival and toxicity.
Methods: Data will be collected from routine clinical assessments. Patients will have the option to provide blood samples drawn at standard-of-care intervals at baseline, during P treatment, and at the end of treatment for potential biomarker identification. Analyses will be primarily descriptive, with point estimates and confidence intervals as well as Kaplan-Meier methods used to assess time-to-event outcomes.
Accrual: Presently, 46 patients from 20 sites are enrolled.
Funding: Pfizer Inc.
Citation Format: Tripathy D, Bardia A, Blum JL, Rocque G, Wilks S, Lakhanpal S, Migas J, Cappelleri J, Perkins J, Comstock G, Wang Y. POLARIS: Palbociclib (P) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer: A prospective multicenter noninterventional study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-05-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Tripathy
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| | - A Bardia
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| | - JL Blum
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| | - G Rocque
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| | - S Wilks
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| | - S Lakhanpal
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| | - J Migas
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| | - J Cappelleri
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| | - J Perkins
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| | - G Comstock
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| | - Y Wang
- Univeristy of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Texas Oncology, Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; St. Vincent's Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; OSF St Joseph Medical Center, Bloomington, IL; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; Pfizer Inc, Santa Rosa, CA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wachter R, Abraham W, Lindenfeld J, Weaver F, Zannad F, Wilks S, Schafer J, Zile M. P1475Positive effects of baroreflex activation therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are independent of baseline blood pressure. Eur Heart J 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx502.p1475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
16
|
Ross JS, Higginson DP, Ryutov D, Fiuza F, Hatarik R, Huntington CM, Kalantar DH, Link A, Pollock BB, Remington BA, Rinderknecht HG, Swadling GF, Turnbull DP, Weber S, Wilks S, Froula DH, Rosenberg MJ, Morita T, Sakawa Y, Takabe H, Drake RP, Kuranz C, Gregori G, Meinecke J, Levy MC, Koenig M, Spitkovsky A, Petrasso RD, Li CK, Sio H, Lahmann B, Zylstra AB, Park HS. Transition from Collisional to Collisionless Regimes in Interpenetrating Plasma Flows on the National Ignition Facility. Phys Rev Lett 2017; 118:185003. [PMID: 28524679 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.185003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
A study of the transition from collisional to collisionless plasma flows has been carried out at the National Ignition Facility using high Mach number (M>4) counterstreaming plasmas. In these experiments, CD-CD and CD-CH planar foils separated by 6-10 mm are irradiated with laser energies of 250 kJ per foil, generating ∼1000 km/s plasma flows. Varying the foil separation distance scales the ion density and average bulk velocity and, therefore, the ion-ion Coulomb mean free path, at the interaction region at the midplane. The characteristics of the flow interaction have been inferred from the neutrons and protons generated by deuteron-deuteron interactions and by x-ray emission from the hot, interpenetrating, and interacting plasmas. A localized burst of neutrons and bright x-ray emission near the midpoint of the counterstreaming flows was observed, suggesting strong heating and the initial stages of shock formation. As the separation of the CD-CH foils increases we observe enhanced neutron production compared to particle-in-cell simulations that include Coulomb collisions, but do not include collective collisionless plasma instabilities. The observed plasma heating and enhanced neutron production is consistent with the initial stages of collisionless shock formation, mediated by the Weibel filamentation instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Ross
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - D P Higginson
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - D Ryutov
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - F Fiuza
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - R Hatarik
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - C M Huntington
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - D H Kalantar
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - A Link
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - B B Pollock
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - B A Remington
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - H G Rinderknecht
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - G F Swadling
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - D P Turnbull
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - S Weber
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - S Wilks
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| | - D H Froula
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, 250 E. River Road, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - M J Rosenberg
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, 250 E. River Road, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - T Morita
- Kyushu University, 6-1 Kasuga-Koen, Kasuga, Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan
| | - Y Sakawa
- Osaka University, 1-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - H Takabe
- Osaka University, 1-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - R P Drake
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - C Kuranz
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | - G Gregori
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road OX1 3PU, United Kingdom
| | - J Meinecke
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road OX1 3PU, United Kingdom
| | - M C Levy
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road OX1 3PU, United Kingdom
| | - M Koenig
- LULI, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS, Universit Paris 6, 91128 Palaiseau, France
| | - A Spitkovsky
- Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - R D Petrasso
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - C K Li
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - H Sio
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - B Lahmann
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - A B Zylstra
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
| | - H-S Park
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, California 94551, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Han HS, Wilks S, Paplomata E, Modiano MR, Becerra C, Braiteh FS, Spira AI, Pluard TJ, Richards DA, Conzen SD, Baker G, Fishman RS, Marcantonio A, O'Shaughnessy J, Nanda R. Abstract P6-12-15: Efficacy results of a phase 1/2 study of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist mifepristone (MIFE) in combination with eribulin in GR-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p6-12-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: GR is variably expressed in TNBC and high expression is associated with poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) early stage breast cancer. Treatment with mifepristone (MIFE) potentiates the effectiveness of chemotherapy in GR+ TNBC xenografts. Enrollment is complete in this study of patients with GR+ TNBC treated at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of MIFE in combination with eribulin. Objectives: To determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical activity of the MIFE plus eribulin combination in pts with GR+ TNBC at the RP2D. Methods: Eligibility: In Part 1 (dose finding), pts with solid tumors; in Part 2 (expansion phase), pts with TNBC (GR result required at time of screening in Part 1, but could be pending at time of screening in Part 2). Up to 5 prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease; ECOG PS 0-1; adequate end-organ function. Design: 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme. After a 7-day lead-in of oral daily MIFE alone, MIFE was continued daily and eribulin was given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. GR+ was defined as >10% of tumor cells with any intensity of GR staining. Results: 16 pts with metastatic breast cancer were treated in Part 1, and 21 pts with TNBC were treated in Part 2. Median age was 54 (range 30-81). MTD/RP2D was MIFE 300 mg/day + eribulin 1.1 mg/m2. Safety: DLT in Part 1 was neutropenia. Neutropenia occurred in 23/36 total patients (2 Grade [G] 1, 10 G3, 11 G4); 2 instances included neutropenic fever. Recovery of WBC was brisk with growth factor support. Neuropathy was observed in 8 pts (5 G1, 1 G2, 2 G3). Other most common AEs (fatigue, hypokalemia, nausea, alopecia) were mainly G1 or G2; among these, G3/G4 events were limited to fatigue (4 G3), hypokalemia (3 G3 and 1 G4) and nausea (1 G3). There were 2 instances of G1 vaginal bleeding. There was no impact of MIFE on eribulin PK. Efficacy: There were 23 evaluable pts with TNBC across Parts 1 and 2 treated at the RP2D: 21 GR+, 2 GR status unknown; median of 3 prior chemotherapy regimens; 1 patient had received prior eribulin. Responses were: 3 PR, 8 SD, 11 PD and one too early to assess. Median PFS was 9 weeks. Conclusions: MIFE plus eribulin was well tolerated and appears to be an active treatment regimen. Five TNBC patients had a PFS longer than the upper 95% CI for PFS (i.e., >15 wks) reported by Aogi et al. for TNBC treated with eribulin (Annals of Oncology 2012?23:144148). Clinical trial information: NCT02014337.
Citation Format: Han HS, Wilks S, Paplomata E, Modiano MR, Becerra C, Braiteh FS, Spira AI, Pluard TJ, Richards DA, Conzen SD, Baker G, Fishman RS, Marcantonio A, O'Shaughnessy J, Nanda R. Efficacy results of a phase 1/2 study of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist mifepristone (MIFE) in combination with eribulin in GR-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HS Han
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - S Wilks
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - E Paplomata
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - MR Modiano
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - C Becerra
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - FS Braiteh
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - AI Spira
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - TJ Pluard
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - DA Richards
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - SD Conzen
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - G Baker
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - RS Fishman
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - A Marcantonio
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - R Nanda
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jones VE, McIntyre KJ, Paul D, Wilks ST, Ondreyco SM, Sedlacek SM, Melnyk AM, Oommen SP, Wang Y, O'Shaughnessy JA. Abstract P4-16-01: Evaluation of miracle mouthwash (MMW) plus hydrocortisone or prednisolone mouth rinses as prophylaxis for everolimus-associated stomatitis: Results of a randomized phase II study. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p4-16-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Oral stomatitis is a frequent adverse event (AE) associated with mTOR-inhibitor therapy, and can impact adherence. In BOLERO-2, patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with exemestane plus everolimus (EVE), the incidence of all-grade (G) stomatitis or related AEs was 67%, with 24%/8% of pts developing G2/G3 stomatitis or related AEs, respectively (Perez et al ASCO 2013 Abs 7029). In BOLERO-2, 24% of pts required EVE dose reduction for stomatitis (Rugo et al Ann Oncol 2014;25:808). This study evaluated 2 steroid-based mouth rinses for the prevention or amelioration of oral stomatitis in pts with MBC treated with EVE. Methods: This prospective randomized phase II study enrolled postmenopausal pts (planned accrual=100) with HR+ MBC within the US Oncology Network who were initiating therapy with an aromatase inhibitor plus EVE (10 mg/day)(AIE). Pts were randomized 1:1 to prophylactic therapy with 1 of 2 oral rinses (ARM 1: MMW 480 ml recipe: 320 mL oral Benadryl, 2 g Tetracycline, 80 mg Hydrocortisone, 40 mL Nystatin suspension, water; or ARM 2: Prednisolone (P) 15mg/5mL oral solution, 1.8% alcohol). Pts were instructed to swish/expectorate 10 ml of the assigned rinse 4x daily starting with D1 of EVE treatment, for a total of 12 wks. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of G≥2 stomatitis or related oral AEs during the first 12 wks of treatment. Based on a historical estimate that ≥37% of pts receiving AIE develop G≥2 stomatitis, 50 pts for each arm were required to detect a reduction of the incidence of G≥2 stomatitis from 37% to <20%, with alpha = 0.05, 80% power, and a 1-sided test. Secondary objectives included assessment of AEs (all grades), determination of the percentage of pts requiring dose interruption/reduction of EVE or discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity, and evaluation of the impact of the oral rinses on the duration and severity of stomatitis. Results: As of 5/30/2016, a total of 104 pts have been randomized and 100 pts have received treatment (49 MMW; 51 P). Median age was 61 yrs (range 31-82 yrs). The incidence of stomatitis and related oral AEs (any grade) during the first 12 wks was 29% (n=14/49) and 27.5% (14/51) in the MMW and P arms respectively. The incidence of G2 oral AEs was 12% (6/49) and 8% (4/51) with MMW and P respectively. There was only 1 G3 oral AE (MMW arm), and no G4 events. There was 1 EVE dose reduction (MMW) and 4 EVE dose delays (3 MMW, 1 P) during the first 12 wks of treatment. No pts stopped the steroid mouth rinse therapy due to mouth rinse-related toxicity. Conclusion: These prospective data provide evidence of a reduced incidence of mTOR-associated oral AEs with prophylactic use of a steroid mouth rinse. The 29%/27.5% incidence of all-grade and 12%/8% incidence of G2 oral AEs, with only 1 G3 event, compare favorably with the 67% and 24%/8% incidence of all-grade and G2/3 stomatitis, respectively, in BOLERO-2. These data also show the safety and tolerability of these 2 steroid mouth rinses. Prophylactic use of steroid mouth rinses substantially decreases the incidence of G2/3 stomatitis and the need for EVE dose modifications.
Citation Format: Jones VE, McIntyre KJ, Paul D, Wilks ST, Ondreyco SM, Sedlacek SM, Melnyk Jr. AM, Oommen SP, Wang Y, O'Shaughnessy JA. Evaluation of miracle mouthwash (MMW) plus hydrocortisone or prednisolone mouth rinses as prophylaxis for everolimus-associated stomatitis: Results of a randomized phase II study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-16-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- VE Jones
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital/North Star Lodge, Yakima, WA; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Arizona Oncology, Glendale, AZ; Texas Oncology, Abilene, TX; Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, TX; McKesson Specialty Health, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology/Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - KJ McIntyre
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital/North Star Lodge, Yakima, WA; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Arizona Oncology, Glendale, AZ; Texas Oncology, Abilene, TX; Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, TX; McKesson Specialty Health, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology/Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - D Paul
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital/North Star Lodge, Yakima, WA; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Arizona Oncology, Glendale, AZ; Texas Oncology, Abilene, TX; Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, TX; McKesson Specialty Health, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology/Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - ST Wilks
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital/North Star Lodge, Yakima, WA; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Arizona Oncology, Glendale, AZ; Texas Oncology, Abilene, TX; Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, TX; McKesson Specialty Health, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology/Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - SM Ondreyco
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital/North Star Lodge, Yakima, WA; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Arizona Oncology, Glendale, AZ; Texas Oncology, Abilene, TX; Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, TX; McKesson Specialty Health, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology/Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - SM Sedlacek
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital/North Star Lodge, Yakima, WA; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Arizona Oncology, Glendale, AZ; Texas Oncology, Abilene, TX; Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, TX; McKesson Specialty Health, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology/Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - AM Melnyk
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital/North Star Lodge, Yakima, WA; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Arizona Oncology, Glendale, AZ; Texas Oncology, Abilene, TX; Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, TX; McKesson Specialty Health, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology/Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - SP Oommen
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital/North Star Lodge, Yakima, WA; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Arizona Oncology, Glendale, AZ; Texas Oncology, Abilene, TX; Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, TX; McKesson Specialty Health, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology/Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Y Wang
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital/North Star Lodge, Yakima, WA; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Arizona Oncology, Glendale, AZ; Texas Oncology, Abilene, TX; Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, TX; McKesson Specialty Health, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology/Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - JA O'Shaughnessy
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital/North Star Lodge, Yakima, WA; Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Arizona Oncology, Glendale, AZ; Texas Oncology, Abilene, TX; Texas Oncology, Fort Worth, TX; McKesson Specialty Health, Inc., The Woodlands, TX; Texas Oncology/Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Diamond J, Borges V, Kabos P, Krill-Jackson E, Graham R, Hoffman A, Lim B, Richards D, Salkeni M, Wilks S, Patel C, Neuwirth R, Kneissl M, Zohren F. Phase 1b/2 safety and efficacy of TAK-228 (MLN0128), plus exemestane (E) or fulvestrant (F) in postmenopausal women with ER + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw365.56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
20
|
Schnadig I, Agajanian R, Dakhil S, Taylor C, Wilks S, Cooper W, Mosier M, Payne Y, Klepper M, Vacirca J. Abstract P1-10-07: Phase 3 comparison of APF530 versus ondansetron, each in a guideline-recommended 3-drug regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting due to anthracycline + cyclophosphamide (AC)–based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the MAGIC trial. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p1-10-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:Managing delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with HEC is an unmet need. AC-based HEC is often administered to breast cancer patients (pts), a mostly female, high-CINV-risk population. APF530, an extended-release formulation of granisetron, demonstrated superior complete response (CR; no emesis [vomiting, retching] + no rescue medication use) in delayed-phase (>24-120 h) CINV with HEC (ASCO criteria) vs ondansetron (Ond) (65% vs 57%, P=0.014), each combined with a neurokinin-1 antagonist and dexamethasone (Dex) (NCT02106494). This post hoc analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of APF530 in pts receiving AC-based therapy.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, pts scheduled to receive single-day HEC were stratified by cisplatin ≥50 mg/m2 yes/no and randomized 1:1 to APF530 500 mg SC (granisetron 10 mg) or Ond 0.15 mg/kg IV. Pts received concomitant Dex 12 mg IV and fosaprepitant 150 mg IV on day 1 and oral Dex on days 2-4. The primary end point was CR in the delayed phase. Secondary and other end points included CR in acute (0-24 h) and overall (0-120 h) phases, and complete control (CC; CR and no more than mild nausea) and total response (TR; CR and no nausea) in acute, delayed, and overall phases. Rates were compared using 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for treatment differences; post hoc analysis was not powered to detect treatment differences in the AC subgroup. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), injection-site reactions (ISRs), laboratory parameters, and vital signs.
Results: A total of 589/902 pts (65%) in the modified intent-to-treat population received AC-based HEC (APF530 291, Ond 298). Baseline demographics were balanced between treatment arms. The majority of pts in the AC subgroup were female (APF530 99%, Ond 98%). Delayed-phase CR was higher with APF530 vs Ond, approaching statistical significance (APF530 64%, Ond 56%; P=0.062) in the AC subgroup, similar to the benefit seen in the larger study. No appreciable benefit of APF530 vs Ond was observed in the acute phase, and trends favorable to APF530 were observed in the overall phase (Table). APF530 was well tolerated. Most AEs were ISRs, generally mild or moderate, and resolved by end of study.
Phase, n (%)APF530OndansetronTreatment DifferenceN=291N=298(95% CI), %Complete responseDelayed185 (64)167 (56)8 (-0.4, 15.4)Overall163 (56)153 (51)5 (-3.4, 12.7)Acute205 (70)204 (69)1 (-5.4, 9.4)Complete controlDelayed171 (59)156 (52)7 (-1.6, 14.4)Overall149 (51)143 (48)3 (-4.9, 11.3 )Acute193 (66)191 (64)2 (-5.5, 9.9)Total responseDelayed119 (41)107 (36)5 (-2.9, 12.8)Overall100 (34)94 (32)2 (-4.8, 10.4)Acute164 (56)173 (58)-2 (-9.7, 6.3)
Conclusions: APF530 demonstrated an apparent clinical benefit in delayed-phase CR in pts receiving AC-based HEC, concordant with the statistically significant benefit seen in the overall study population. Prevention of CINV in this patient population continues to be a treatment challenge and further investigation is needed.
Citation Format: Schnadig I, Agajanian R, Dakhil S, Taylor C, Wilks S, Cooper W, Mosier M, Payne Y, Klepper M, Vacirca J. Phase 3 comparison of APF530 versus ondansetron, each in a guideline-recommended 3-drug regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting due to anthracycline + cyclophosphamide (AC)–based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the MAGIC trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Schnadig
- Compass Oncology, US Oncology Network, Tualatin, OR; The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, CA; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Tulsa Cancer Institute, Tulsa, OK; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; TFS International, Flemington, NJ; EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS; Heron Therapeutics, Redwood City, CA; Drug Safety Navigator, LLC, Durham, NC; North Shore Hematology Oncology, East Setauket, NY
| | - R Agajanian
- Compass Oncology, US Oncology Network, Tualatin, OR; The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, CA; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Tulsa Cancer Institute, Tulsa, OK; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; TFS International, Flemington, NJ; EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS; Heron Therapeutics, Redwood City, CA; Drug Safety Navigator, LLC, Durham, NC; North Shore Hematology Oncology, East Setauket, NY
| | - S Dakhil
- Compass Oncology, US Oncology Network, Tualatin, OR; The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, CA; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Tulsa Cancer Institute, Tulsa, OK; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; TFS International, Flemington, NJ; EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS; Heron Therapeutics, Redwood City, CA; Drug Safety Navigator, LLC, Durham, NC; North Shore Hematology Oncology, East Setauket, NY
| | - C Taylor
- Compass Oncology, US Oncology Network, Tualatin, OR; The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, CA; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Tulsa Cancer Institute, Tulsa, OK; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; TFS International, Flemington, NJ; EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS; Heron Therapeutics, Redwood City, CA; Drug Safety Navigator, LLC, Durham, NC; North Shore Hematology Oncology, East Setauket, NY
| | - S Wilks
- Compass Oncology, US Oncology Network, Tualatin, OR; The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, CA; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Tulsa Cancer Institute, Tulsa, OK; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; TFS International, Flemington, NJ; EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS; Heron Therapeutics, Redwood City, CA; Drug Safety Navigator, LLC, Durham, NC; North Shore Hematology Oncology, East Setauket, NY
| | - W Cooper
- Compass Oncology, US Oncology Network, Tualatin, OR; The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, CA; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Tulsa Cancer Institute, Tulsa, OK; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; TFS International, Flemington, NJ; EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS; Heron Therapeutics, Redwood City, CA; Drug Safety Navigator, LLC, Durham, NC; North Shore Hematology Oncology, East Setauket, NY
| | - M Mosier
- Compass Oncology, US Oncology Network, Tualatin, OR; The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, CA; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Tulsa Cancer Institute, Tulsa, OK; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; TFS International, Flemington, NJ; EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS; Heron Therapeutics, Redwood City, CA; Drug Safety Navigator, LLC, Durham, NC; North Shore Hematology Oncology, East Setauket, NY
| | - Y Payne
- Compass Oncology, US Oncology Network, Tualatin, OR; The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, CA; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Tulsa Cancer Institute, Tulsa, OK; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; TFS International, Flemington, NJ; EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS; Heron Therapeutics, Redwood City, CA; Drug Safety Navigator, LLC, Durham, NC; North Shore Hematology Oncology, East Setauket, NY
| | - M Klepper
- Compass Oncology, US Oncology Network, Tualatin, OR; The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, CA; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Tulsa Cancer Institute, Tulsa, OK; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; TFS International, Flemington, NJ; EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS; Heron Therapeutics, Redwood City, CA; Drug Safety Navigator, LLC, Durham, NC; North Shore Hematology Oncology, East Setauket, NY
| | - J Vacirca
- Compass Oncology, US Oncology Network, Tualatin, OR; The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, Whittier, CA; Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS; Tulsa Cancer Institute, Tulsa, OK; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; TFS International, Flemington, NJ; EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC, Overland Park, KS; Heron Therapeutics, Redwood City, CA; Drug Safety Navigator, LLC, Durham, NC; North Shore Hematology Oncology, East Setauket, NY
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wilks S, Modiano M, Spira A, Becerra C, Walling J, Nguyen D, Baker G, Conzen SD, Nanda R. Abstract P6-13-21: Phase 1 study of GR antagonist mifepristone (M) in combination with eribulin (E) in advanced solid tumors, with dose expansion in patients (pts) with GR-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p6-13-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: High tumor GR expression is associated with poor prognosis in estrogen receptor (ER) negative early-stage breast cancer. Co-treatment with M, a GR antagonist, potentiates effects of chemotherapy in ER- breast cancer xenograft studies. Herein we describe results of a phase 1 dose-escalation study of M plus E, with an ongoing dose expansion cohort in pts with GR+ TNBC.
Objectives: Determine 1) safety and tolerability, 2) recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of M + E, and 3) characterize pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical activity of M in pts with GR+ TNBC.
Methods: Eligibility: 1) relapsed/refractory breast, ovarian, prostate, urothelial, sarcoma, or non-small cell lung cancer; 2) 2-5 prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease; 3) ECOG PS 0-1; and 4) adequate end-organ function. Study used a 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme. After a 7 day lead-in of M alone, M was administered by mouth daily in combination with E given IV on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle.
Results: 13 pts in Part 1 Dose escalation with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were treated with M+E: 5 TNBC, 8 GR+ tumors, 2 GR- tumors, and 3 of unknown GR status. Pts were treated at 3 dose levels (DL)[M mg/d, E mg/m2]: 3 at DL1 [600, 1.1] 4 at DL-1a [300, 1.4], and 6 at DL-1 [300, 1.1]. Median duration of treatment was 90+ days. Neutropenia leading to delay of E was dose limiting in 4 pts. CTAE Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 10 pts over all DL, but easily managed (9 pts with growth factor support). Other grade 3+ toxicities were neuropathy (2 pts) and onycholysis (1 pt). No other significant toxicity was noted.
RP2D was determined as 300mg/d M and 1.1mg/m2 E. At this DL there were no DLTs. PK of M and E were as predicted from published literature with no evidence of drug-drug interaction (DDI). A total of 6 pts received this dose (3 TNBC; 3 MBC). All 3 TNBC were GR+. 1 had partial response, 1 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease.
A phase I/II study of M+E is now in progress. To date, 3 GR+ TNBC pts have been treated for a median of 28+ days.
Conclusion: M + E is a novel combination designed to improve antitumor activity. It is well tolerated with evidence of clinical activity and no evidence of DDI. RP2D is 300mg M + E 1.1mg/m2. Study is ongoing in expansion phase where recruitment is limited to pts with GR+ TNBC. Additional PK and clinical data will be presented.
Citation Format: Wilks S, Modiano M, Spira A, Becerra C, Walling J, Nguyen D, Baker G, Conzen SD, Nanda R. Phase 1 study of GR antagonist mifepristone (M) in combination with eribulin (E) in advanced solid tumors, with dose expansion in patients (pts) with GR-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-13-21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Wilks
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AR; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, VA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; JW Consulting, Hillsborough, CA; Corcept Therapeutics, Menlo Park, CA; University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - M Modiano
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AR; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, VA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; JW Consulting, Hillsborough, CA; Corcept Therapeutics, Menlo Park, CA; University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - A Spira
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AR; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, VA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; JW Consulting, Hillsborough, CA; Corcept Therapeutics, Menlo Park, CA; University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - C Becerra
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AR; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, VA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; JW Consulting, Hillsborough, CA; Corcept Therapeutics, Menlo Park, CA; University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - J Walling
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AR; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, VA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; JW Consulting, Hillsborough, CA; Corcept Therapeutics, Menlo Park, CA; University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - D Nguyen
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AR; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, VA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; JW Consulting, Hillsborough, CA; Corcept Therapeutics, Menlo Park, CA; University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - G Baker
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AR; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, VA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; JW Consulting, Hillsborough, CA; Corcept Therapeutics, Menlo Park, CA; University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - SD Conzen
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AR; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, VA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; JW Consulting, Hillsborough, CA; Corcept Therapeutics, Menlo Park, CA; University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - R Nanda
- Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AR; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute, Fairfax, VA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; JW Consulting, Hillsborough, CA; Corcept Therapeutics, Menlo Park, CA; University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rinderknecht HG, Rosenberg MJ, Li CK, Hoffman NM, Kagan G, Zylstra AB, Sio H, Frenje JA, Gatu Johnson M, Séguin FH, Petrasso RD, Amendt P, Bellei C, Wilks S, Delettrez J, Glebov VY, Stoeckl C, Sangster TC, Meyerhofer DD, Nikroo A. Ion thermal decoupling and species separation in shock-driven implosions. Phys Rev Lett 2015; 114:025001. [PMID: 25635549 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.114.025001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Anomalous reduction of the fusion yields by 50% and anomalous scaling of the burn-averaged ion temperatures with the ion-species fraction has been observed for the first time in D^{3}He-filled shock-driven inertial confinement fusion implosions. Two ion kinetic mechanisms are used to explain the anomalous observations: thermal decoupling of the D and ^{3}He populations and diffusive species separation. The observed insensitivity of ion temperature to a varying deuterium fraction is shown to be a signature of ion thermal decoupling in shock-heated plasmas. The burn-averaged deuterium fraction calculated from the experimental data demonstrates a reduction in the average core deuterium density, as predicted by simulations that use a diffusion model. Accounting for each of these effects in simulations reproduces the observed yield trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans G Rinderknecht
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - M J Rosenberg
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - C K Li
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - N M Hoffman
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
| | - G Kagan
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
| | - A B Zylstra
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - H Sio
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - J A Frenje
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - M Gatu Johnson
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - F H Séguin
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - R D Petrasso
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - P Amendt
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - C Bellei
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - S Wilks
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - J Delettrez
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - V Yu Glebov
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - C Stoeckl
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - T C Sangster
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - D D Meyerhofer
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - A Nikroo
- General Atomics, San Diego, California 92121, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rinderknecht HG, Sio H, Li CK, Zylstra AB, Rosenberg MJ, Amendt P, Delettrez J, Bellei C, Frenje JA, Gatu Johnson M, Séguin FH, Petrasso RD, Betti R, Glebov VY, Meyerhofer DD, Sangster TC, Stoeckl C, Landen O, Smalyuk VA, Wilks S, Greenwood A, Nikroo A. First observations of nonhydrodynamic mix at the fuel-shell interface in shock-driven inertial confinement implosions. Phys Rev Lett 2014; 112:135001. [PMID: 24745431 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.112.135001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2013] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
A strong nonhydrodynamic mechanism generating atomic fuel-shell mix has been observed in strongly shocked inertial confinement fusion implosions of thin deuterated-plastic shells filled with 3He gas. These implosions were found to produce D3He-proton shock yields comparable to implosions of identical shells filled with a hydroequivalent 50∶50 D3He gas mixture. Standard hydrodynamic mixing cannot explain this observation, as hydrodynamic modeling including mix predicts a yield an order of magnitude lower than was observed. Instead, these results can be attributed to ion diffusive mix at the fuel-shell interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H G Rinderknecht
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - H Sio
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - C K Li
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - A B Zylstra
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - M J Rosenberg
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - P Amendt
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - J Delettrez
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - C Bellei
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - J A Frenje
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - M Gatu Johnson
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - F H Séguin
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - R D Petrasso
- Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | - R Betti
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - V Yu Glebov
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - D D Meyerhofer
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - T C Sangster
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - C Stoeckl
- Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14623, USA
| | - O Landen
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - V A Smalyuk
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - S Wilks
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA
| | - A Greenwood
- General Atomics, San Diego, California 92121, USA
| | - A Nikroo
- General Atomics, San Diego, California 92121, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jerusalem G, Masuda N, André F, Fein L, Fasolo A, O'Regan R, Wilks S, Isaacs C, Zhang Y, Taran T, Toi M. Abstract P3-15-03: Safety analysis of BOLERO-3: A phase 3 trial of daily everolimus (EVE) vs placebo (PBO), both with weekly trastuzumab (TRAS) and vinorelbine in trastuzumab-resistant, advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p3-15-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Activation of the PI3K/mTOR pathway is thought to be involved in resistance to TRAS. BOLERO-3 is a randomized phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, clinical trial evaluating the addition of the mTOR inhibitor EVE (5 mg/day) to TRAS plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) in patients with HER2+ advanced breast cancer resistant to TRAS and who were previously treated with a taxane. A total of 569 adult women were randomized 1:1 to receive EVE (n = 284) or PBO (n = 285). Study treatment represented the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th line of chemotherapy-containing regimen for 83% of patients in the metastatic setting. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival based on local radiologic assessment, was significantly longer in the EVE arm versus PBO (HR = 0.78; P = .0067) at a median follow-up of 20 months.
Methods: Study drugs were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Incidences of adverse events (AEs) were monitored continuously. Dose modifications and discontinuations were recorded.
Results: The median duration of exposure to study treatment was similar across treatment groups: 24.8 weeks for EVE, 25.1 weeks for TRAS, and 24.0 weeks for vinorelbine (EVE arm); and 22.9 weeks for PBO, 24.0 weeks for TRAS, and 23.1 weeks for vinorelbine (PBO arm). The AEs were consistent with known drug-safety profiles. Class-effect AEs with mTOR inhibitors (including stomatitis, rash, noninfectious pneumonitis, and hyperglycemia) were higher in the EVE arm and were mainly grade 1/2. Grade 3 class-effect AEs each occurred in <15% of patients (stomatitis [13%], hyperglycemia [2%], and noninfectious pneumonitis [<1%]). Grade 4 noninfectious pneumonitis (<1%) was uncommon; there were no grade 4 events of stomatitis or hyperglycemia, and no grade 3/4 events of rash. The incidence and grade of hematologic AEs were increased in the EVE arm vs the PBO arm, including all grade neutropenia (81% vs 70%), anemia (49% vs 29%), febrile neutropenia (17% vs 4%) and thrombocytopenia (14% vs 2%); grade 3/4 hematologic AEs included neutropenia (grade 3: 35% vs 32%; grade 4: 38% vs 30%), anemia (grade 3: 17% vs 6%; grade 4: 2% vs <1%), febrile neutropenia (grade 3: 11% vs 3%; grade 4: 5% vs 1%), and thrombocytopenia (grade 3: 3% vs <1%; grade 4: 1% vs 0). The incidences and grades of changes in liver enzymes and hyperlipidemia were similar between arms. Serious AEs were reported in 42% of patients in the EVE arm and 20% of patients in the PBO arm (26% and 6% were attributed to study treatments, respectively). A higher percentage of patients discontinued treatment because of AEs in the EVE arm versus PBO (10% vs 5%). In all, 83% of patients required at least 1 EVE dose interruption and/or reduction; 96% of these were attributed to AEs. There were fewer deaths in the EVE arm (37%) compared with PBO (41%).
Conclusions: The safety of the combination of EVE, TRAS, and vinorelbine was considered manageable in this heavily pretreated patient population. Overall, the results from BOLERO-3 demonstrate that EVE can be combined with TRAS and chemotherapy to improve efficacy in TRAS-resistant HER2+ advanced breast cancer previously treated with a taxane.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-15-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Jerusalem
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - N Masuda
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - F André
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - L Fein
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - A Fasolo
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - R O'Regan
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - S Wilks
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - C Isaacs
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Y Zhang
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - T Taran
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - M Toi
- CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Instituto De Oncologia De Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Toi M, Masuda N, Andre F, Ishiguro H, Fasolo A, Xu B, Jerusalem G, Shen K, Wilks S, O'Regan R, Isaacs C, Zhang Y, Taran T, Yap YS. Abstract P4-12-19: BOLERO-3: Everolimus plus trastuzumab and vinorelbine in Asian patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p4-12-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Resistance to trastuzumab may occur through activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, the inhibition of which may restore trastuzumab sensitivity. BOLERO-3, a phase 3, double-blind, international trial involving 569 patients with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive (HER2+), advanced breast cancer pretreated with a taxane, recently reported that adding everolimus (EVE; an mTOR inhibitor) to vinorelbine and trastuzumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo (PBO) plus vinorelbine and trastuzumab (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78; log-rank P = .0067). As EVE pharmacokinetics and, therefore, clinical effects may be different in Asian patients, we analyzed the efficacy and safety data from BOLERO-3 for the Asian population.
Methods: Eligible women with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2+, advanced breast cancer who received prior taxane therapy were randomized (1:1) to EVE (5 mg/day) or matching PBO in combination with weekly vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) and trastuzumab (2 mg/kg after 4-mg/kg loading dose). The primary endpoint was PFS by investigator. Secondary endpoints included safety.
Results: Among 569 patients enrolled in this study, 166 (29%) patients were Asian; 88 and 78 were assigned to EVE or PBO arms, respectively. In this subpopulation, adding EVE to vinorelbine and trastuzumab prolonged median PFS compared with the PBO arm (8.3 vs 6.8 months, respectively; HR = 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 - 1.18). In general, the incidence of all grade adverse events was similar for Asian versus non-Asian patients in the EVE arm (stomatitis, 71% vs 59%; pneumonitis, 7% vs 5%; and infections, 58% vs 70%) and the PBO arm (stomatitis, 31% vs 26%; pneumonitis, 1% vs 4%; and infections, 48% vs 49%). Serious adverse events had a low incidence and included febrile neutropenia (9.1%), neutropenia (2.3%), stomatitis (2.3%), anemia (2.3%), and cataract (2.3%) as the most common among Asian patients in the EVE arm. The incidence of serious pneumonitis was low: Asian (1.1%) versus non-Asian patients (0%) in the EVE arm and 0% versus 1.5%, respectively, in the PBO arm.
Conclusions: Asian patients in the BOLERO-3 trial treated with EVE plus vinorelbine and trastuzumab showed PFS benefits similar to the overall population and had a comparable manageable safety profile. Thus, EVE in combination with vinorelbine and trastuzumab may be considered as a new therapeutic option for Asian women with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2+, advanced breast cancer progressing after taxane-based therapies.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P4-12-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Toi
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - N Masuda
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - F Andre
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - H Ishiguro
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - A Fasolo
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - B Xu
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - G Jerusalem
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - K Shen
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - S Wilks
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - R O'Regan
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C Isaacs
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Y Zhang
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - T Taran
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Y-S Yap
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University Cancer Center, Kyoto, Japan; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milan, Italy; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Cancer Care Center of South Texas, TX; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Isaacs C, Ozguroglu M, Jerusalem G, Xu B, Láng I, O'Regan R, White M, Fasolo A, Litton J, Toi M, Shen K, Andre F, Vuylsteke P, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Taran T, Wilks S. Abstract P4-12-18: BOLERO-3: Quality-of-life maintained in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with everolimus plus trastuzumab plus vinorelbine. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p4-12-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Activation of the PI3K/mTOR pathway is implicated in resistance to trastuzumab. Accordingly, the BOLERO-3 study evaluated the efficacy of adding everolimus (EVE), an mTOR inhibitor, to vinorelbine and trastuzumab. At the final progression-free survival (PFS) analysis, EVE significantly improved PFS vs PBO (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78; log-rank P = .0067) but EVE-treated patients had higher rate of grade 3/4 toxicity. To further qualify the benefit:risk of adding EVE to trastuzumab-based therapy, per-protocol, patient-reported, health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) data were analyzed.
Methods: BOLERO-3 is a randomized phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international multicenter trial. Taxane-pretreated patients (N = 569) with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2+, advanced breast cancer were randomized (1:1) to treatment with EVE or placebo (PBO) plus vinorelbine and trastuzumab. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality-of-life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) (including the breast cancer-specific BR23 module) was administered at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter until progression. The QLQ-C30 consists of 30 items combined into 15 subscales, including Global Health Status and functional subscales, where higher scores (range, 0 to 100) indicate better HRQoL. Time to definitive deterioration (TTD) based on a 10% decrease from baseline for GHS and for the physical, emotional, and social function subscales was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment arms were compared using a 2-sided log-rank test stratified by prior use of lapatinib.
Results: Overall, there was no significant difference in median TDD of HRQoL between treatment arms. The median TTD in global health status score was 8.3 months for EVE (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9-11.5) vs 7.3 months for PBO (95% CI, 5.6-10.4; P = .8386). The median TTD in the physical, emotional, and social function subscale scores showed no significant difference between arms. For example, median TTD in the physical function subscale score was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.3-14.1) for EVE vs 12.5 months (95% CI, 8.3-20.9) for PBO (P = .4251), and median TTD in the emotional function subscale score was 15.2 months (95% CI, 9.2-17.3) for EVE vs 12.5 months (95% CI, 9.7-16.4) for PBO (P = .8140).
Conclusions: These analyses demonstrate that, despite increased frequency of adverse events observed with the addition of EVE to the standard treatment of vinorelbine and trastuzumab, overall and functional HRQoL scores were not negatively impacted in patients with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2+, advanced breast cancer.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P4-12-18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Isaacs
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Ozguroglu
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - G Jerusalem
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - B Xu
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - I Láng
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - R O'Regan
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - M White
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Fasolo
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - J Litton
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Toi
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - K Shen
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - F Andre
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - P Vuylsteke
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - Y Zhang
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - J Zhang
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - T Taran
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Wilks
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; CHU Sart Tilman Liege, Liege, Belgium; Chinese Academy of Medcical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA; San Raffaele Cancer Center, Milano, Italy; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai City, China; Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Clinique et Maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ; Clinique et Maternite Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Monash Health, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wilks S, Puhalla S, O'Shaughnessy J, Schwartzberg L, Berrak E, Song J, Rege J, Cox D, Vahdat L. Abstract P4-12-12: Phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study of eribulin mesylate + trastuzumab as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p4-12-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Eribulin mesylate, a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor, has been approved for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who have previously received ≥2 chemotherapeutic regimens for MBC. We present final data from a phase 2 study that evaluated efficacy and safety of eribulin + trastuzumab as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) BC.
Methods: Patients received eribulin mesylate at 1.4 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle and an initial trastuzumab dose of 8 mg/kg IV on day 1, followed by 6 mg/kg on day 1 of each subsequent cycle. Endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), safety, progression-free survival (PFS), time to response (TTR), and duration of response (DOR). Tumor assessments were conducted every 6 weeks for the first 6 cycles and every 6-12 weeks thereafter per RECIST 1.1.
Results: Fifty-two patients with a median age of 60 years (range 31- 81) were treated; 96% had stage IV disease, 73% had visceral disease, and 48% had liver metastases. Thirty one patients had prior neo/adjuvant chemotherapy (11 had prior anthracycline, and 22 had prior taxane). Patients received a median of 10(0, 33) cycles of eribulin and 11(1, 31) cycles of trastuzumab. ORR was 67% with median TTR of 1.3 months and PFS of 11.5 months (Table). The most common (>5%) Grade 3/4 treatment related treatment emergent (TRTE) AEs were neutropenia (n = 20; 38.5%), peripheral neuropathy (n = 14; 26.9%) and febrile neutropenia (n = 4; 7.7%). Serious TRTE AEs occurred in 14 patients and included neutropenia (n = 9; 17.3%), febrile neutropenia (n = 4; 7.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (n = 3; 5.8%). Reasons for discontinuation were AEs (n = 7) and PD (n = 22).
Table. Summary of Efficacy EndpointsEfficacy EndpointsEribulin/Trastuzumab N = 52Objective Response Rate, n (%)35 (67)- Complete Response (CR)2 (4)- Partial Response (PR)33 (64)Stable Disease (SD)15 (29)Progressive Disease (PD)1 (2)Not Evaluable1 (2)Overall Clinical Benefit Rate, n (%)42 (81)Time to First Objective Response, median months (95% CI)1.3 (1.2, 1.4)Duration of Objective Response, median months (95% CI)a11.1 (6.5, 17.8)Progression-Free Survival, median months (95% CI)11.5 (7.3, 13.5)Duration of Stable Disease, median months (95% CI)7.1 (5.2, 13.5)Clinical Benefit Rate = ORR+ ≥6 mo SD; an = 35
Conclusions: This study suggests that the combination of eribulin + trastuzumab first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic HER2+ BC has an acceptable safety profile and results in considerable tumor response with a long DOR. Additional larger studies with this combination are warranted.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P4-12-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Wilks
- US Oncology - Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - S Puhalla
- US Oncology - Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- US Oncology - Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - L Schwartzberg
- US Oncology - Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - E Berrak
- US Oncology - Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - J Song
- US Oncology - Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - J Rege
- US Oncology - Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - D Cox
- US Oncology - Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - L Vahdat
- US Oncology - Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center US Oncology, Dallas, TX; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vahdat L, Schwartzberg L, Wilks S, Rege J, Liao J, Cox D, O'Shaughnessy J. Abstract P5-20-04: Eribulin mesylate + trastuzumab as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: results from a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm study. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p5-20-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Eribulin mesylate, a novel non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor, has been approved for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who have previously received at least two chemotherapeutic regimens for MBC. This study evaluates efficacy and safety of eribulin + trastuzumab (TRAZ) as first-line therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) locally recurrent or MBC.
Methods: Patients received eribulin mesylate at 1.4 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and TRAZ initial dose of 8 mg/kg IV on day 1 every 21 days, followed by 6 mg/kg on day 1 of each subsequent cycle. For study inclusion, patients could have been previously treated with TRAZ, but at least 12 months should have passed since any prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy was used. Endpoints include objective response rate (ORR) (primary), safety, progression free survival (PFS), time to response (TTR), and duration of response (DOR). Tumor assessments are evaluated every 6 weeks for the first 6 cycles and every 6–12 weeks thereafter per RECIST 1.1.
Results: Updated results presented here as of June 1, 2012; 37 of 52 planned patients have been treated. Patient characteristics are as follows: median age: 58 years (range, 31–81), 70% have luminal subtype, 95% are stage IV disease, and 73% have visceral disease, 46% had prior neo/adjuvant, 22% had prior anthracycline and 32% had prior taxane, 35% had original diagnosis of MBC. Patients received median of 7 (1,20) cycles for eribulin and 9 (1,23) cycles for TRAZ. The most common treatment related AEs are reported in Table 1.
Treatment-related serious AEs were reported for 4 (11%) patients; neutropenia 3 (8%) and febrile neutropenia 2 (6%) patients each. Eight patients have discontinued treatment due to disease progression (PD). Best patient responses are found in Table 2.
Conclusions: Based on the updated preliminary results of this Phase II study, the combination of eribulin + trastuzumab as first-line therapy for HER2+ locally recurrent or MBC appears to demonstrate an acceptable safety profile with considerable tumor responses, including in patients with ER/PR+ disease. Accrual is ongoing and study completion is anticipated prior to SABCS 2012.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-20-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Vahdat
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - L Schwartzberg
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - S Wilks
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - J Rege
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - J Liao
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - D Cox
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Jones S, Paul D, Sedlacek S, Vukelja S, Wilks ST, Stokoe C, Osborne CR, Krekow L, McIntyre K, Holmes FA, Guerra L, Zhan F, Asmar L, O'Shaughnessy J, Blum JL. P5-18-09: The Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in the First Course of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Docetaxel/Cyclophosphamide with or without Pegfilgrastim. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p5-18-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In our original doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide/docetaxel-cyclophosphamide (AC/TC) adjuvant study (JCO 27: 1177–1183, 2009), we reported an incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) of 5% (8% in women ≥65 years) with the TC regimen without prophylactic WBC growth factors but with a recommendation for prophylactic antibiotics. There is a paucity of data on the incidence of FN with the TC regimen aside from this clinical trial. Because we have been conducting a randomized adjuvant study of TC compared to other regimens, we used this opportunity to analyze the incidence of FN during the first course of chemotherapy with TC in the first cohort of randomized patients (US Oncology Network study 06090). The prophylactic use of WBC growth factors was at the investigator's discretion.
Patients and Methods
The study included 1298 patients entered between May 2007 and May 2009. Of these, 649 were included in the TC arm. Median age was 54 years (range 27–71), 75.5% were Caucasian, 561 (86.4%) were in PS 0 at baseline, and about half were node negative. Eight patients did not receive study treatment for various reasons. Among the 641 patients who received TC; 213 (33.3%) received pegfilgrastim, 48 (7.5%) received filgrastim and were not included in this analysis, and 380 (59.2%) patients did not receive either during the first cycle. Thus, this analysis focused on 593 women who did or did not receive prophylactic pegfilgrastim in cycle 1.
Results: All patients with a reported adverse event of FN or with a reported AE of fever with some degree of neutropenia (in order to capture all possible cases of FN) during the first cycle of TC were identified [Table 1]. FN and fever + neutropenia occurred in a total of 6 (2.8%) patients who received pegfilgrastim and 36 (9.5%) patients who did not. A comparison of age, race, performance status and stage of disease between these 2 groups revealed that they were similar. The 213 patients who received pegfilgrastim were slightly older (median 56 years, range 27–71) compared to those who did not (median 53 years, range 30–71).
During all 6 cycles, 41 patients reported FN, and 30 (73%) of these patients experienced FN during cycle 1.
Conclusion: Among 593 women who received TC as adjuvant chemotherapy, the incidence of FN during the first cycle was under 10% whether or not the patients received prophylactic pegfilgrastim.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Jones
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - D Paul
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - S Sedlacek
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - S Vukelja
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - ST Wilks
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - C Stokoe
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - CR Osborne
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - L Krekow
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - K McIntyre
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - FA Holmes
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - L Guerra
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - F Zhan
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - L Asmar
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| | - JL Blum
- 1US Oncology, The Woodlands, TX; Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center, Baylor University, Dallas, TX; Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology-Tyler, Tyler, TX; Cancer Care Centers of South Texas, San Antonio, TX; Texas Oncology, Plano, TX; Breast Cancer Center of North Texas, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX; Texas Oncology-Houston Memorial City, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Collins A, Wilks S, Wootton D, Wright A, Davies L, Hadcroft J, Gordon S. S65 Early supported discharge scheme (ESDS) for pneumonia & lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI): are there enough suitable patients? Thorax 2011. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201054b.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
32
|
|
33
|
|
34
|
|
35
|
Gião MS, Wilks S, Azevedo NF, Vieira MJ, Keevil CW. Incorporation of natural uncultivable Legionella pneumophila into potable water biofilms provides a protective niche against chlorination stress. Biofouling 2009; 25:335-341. [PMID: 19241230 DOI: 10.1080/08927010902802232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Legionella pneumophila is a waterborne pathogen that has been isolated sporadically from drinking water distribution systems (DWDS). Resistance to disinfectants is mainly attributed to the association of cells with amoebae, but biofilms are also thought to provide some degree of protection. In the present work, a two-stage chemostat was used to form heterotrophic biofilms from drinking water to study the influence of chlorine on the presence of naturally occurring L. pneumophila. The pathogen was tracked in planktonic and sessile biofilm phases using standard culture recovery techniques for cultivable cells and a peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridisation assay for total cells. The results showed that the total number of L. pneumophila cells in biofilms was not affected by the concentrations of chlorine tested, and the presence of L. pneumophila could not be detected by culturing. To restrict the outbreaks of disease caused by this bacterium, efforts need to be concentrated on preventing L. pneumophila from re-entering an infectious state by maintaining residual disinfectant levels through the entire DWDS network so that the resuscitation of cells via contact with amoebae is prevented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Gião
- IBB-Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre of Biological Engineering, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gião MS, Wilks S, Azevedo NF, Vieira MJ, Keevil CW. Incorporation of natural uncultivable Legionella pneumophila into potable water biofilms provides a protective niche against chlorination stress. Biofouling 2009; 25:345-51. [PMID: 23110528 DOI: 10.1080/08927010902803305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Legionella pneumophila is a waterborne pathogen that has been isolated sporadically from drinking water distribution systems (DWDS). Resistance to disinfectants is mainly attributed to the association of cells with amoebae, but biofilms are also thought to provide some degree of protection. In the present work, a two-stage chemostat was used to form heterotrophic biofilms from drinking water to study the influence of chlorine on the presence of naturally occurring L. pneumophila. The pathogen was tracked in planktonic and sessile biofilm phases using standard culture recovery techniques for cultivable cells and a peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridisation assay for total cells. The results showed that the total number of L. pneumophila cells in biofilms was not affected by the concentrations of chlorine tested, and the presence of L. pneumophila could not be detected by culturing. To restrict the outbreaks of disease caused by this bacterium, efforts need to be concentrated on preventing L. pneumophila from re-entering an infectious state by maintaining residual disinfectant levels through the entire DWDS network so that the resuscitation of cells via contact with amoebae is prevented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Gião
- IBB-Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre of Biological Engineering, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Wilson KW, Winget D, Wilks S. Blastocystis hominis infection: signs and symptoms in patients at Wilford Hall Medical Center. Mil Med 1990; 155:394-6. [PMID: 2120622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Blastocystis hominis (B. hominis) is a protozoan that may inhabit the human gastrointestinal tract. In our study we reviewed the signs and symptoms of patients at Wilford Hall with stool specimens positive for B. hominis. These patients fell into four groups, HIV-positive adults, foreign nationals, children, and adults not known to be HIV positive. B. hominis caused an acute self-limited diarrheal illness, or chronic gastroenteritis with nausea, abdominal pain, and mild diarrhea. Metronidazole effectively relieved the symptoms and cleared the organism in some but not all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K W Wilson
- Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB, TX 78236
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Wilks S, Meier P. Helping mothers express milk suitable for preterm and high-risk infant feeding. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 1988; 13:121-3. [PMID: 3128701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
41
|
Meier P, Wilks S. The bacteria in expressed mothers' milk. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 1987; 12:420-3. [PMID: 3123846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
42
|
Wilks S. [Renal transplantation]. Xianggang Hu Li Za Zhi 1982:29-30. [PMID: 6182079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
43
|
Wilks S. Renal transplantation. Nursing 1980:769-71. [PMID: 6999387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
44
|
Wilks S. Unpublished papers of Thomas Hodgkin. Bull N Y Acad Med 1970; 46:67-9. [PMID: 4903331 PMCID: PMC1749651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
45
|
|
46
|
|
47
|
Wilks S. MR. LECKY AND VIVISECTION. West J Med 1907. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.2448.1620-b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
48
|
Wilks S. THE EVOLUTION OF THE STETHOSCOPE. West J Med 1907. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.2428.115-a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
49
|
|
50
|
|