A Multicenter Study of Clinical to Planning Target Volume Margins for Adjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation Delivered on the 1.5T MR-Linear Accelerator

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Adjuvant partial breast irradiation (APBI) for early-stage breast cancer patients delivered on a conventional Linac commonly uses a clinical to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin of 10 mm. Published data suggest this margin could be reduced using an MR-guided workflow. This study quantifies the CTV to PTV margin for APBI delivered on the 1.5T MR-Linac (MRL) using an Adapt to Position (ATP) workflow.

MATERIALS/METHODS

All target contouring was done as per the IMPORT LOW trial and MRL Consortium guidelines. The CTV is the tumor bed defined by surgical clips including postsurgical changes. A single center cohort of ten patients was used to assess delineation error on ProKnow DS v1.28.0 by measuring CTV contour displacements on the CT planning scans (pCT) delineated by five breast radiation oncologists. All other error components were measured on treatment planning software on another single center cohort of ten patients. Target deformation error was measured as surgical clip displacements between the pCT and daily pre-treatment (pre-Tx) MRI scans. Intrafraction motion was determined by the CTV displacement between pre- and post-treatment MRIs (post-Tx) in available paired images from five patients. Matching error was estimated as the interobserver variation of three MRL radiographers registering the pCT with daily pre-Tx MRI. Technical delivery accuracy was estimated using the results from routine quality assurance measurements. Beam penumbral width (p) was estimated from the clinical treatment plans. The systematic (Σ) and random errors (σ) for each component were calculated in the left/right (X), superior/inferior (Y) and anterior/posterior (Z) directions. The contribution of these errors to the PTV margin, M was calculated using van Herk's formula with α and β being 2.50 and 1.64 respectively.

RESULTS

For APBI using an MRL ATP workflow, a CTV-PTV margin of 5.7 to 7.6 mm is required to achieve a 90% confidence of CTV coverage by the 95% isodose. Individual error components are in. Table 1 delineation error remains the largest component of error.

CONCLUSION

A minimum CTV-PTV margin of 6-8 mm is required for APBI using an MRL ATP workflow. Although smaller than margins used in conventional Linacs, the clinical benefits (in terms of fibrosis risk) of treating APBI patients on an MRL are likely to be modest. Further margin reductions may be possible using an "Adapt to Shape" workflow with daily online recontouring.

Adaptive radiotherapy for breast cancer

Research in the field of local and locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy aims to maintain excellent oncological outcomes while reducing treatment-related toxicity. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) considers variations in target and organs at risk (OARs) anatomy occurring during the treatment course and integrates these in re-optimized treatment plans. Exploiting ART routinely in clinic may result in smaller target volumes and better OAR sparing, which may lead to reduction of acute as well as late toxicities. In this review MR-guided and CT-guided ART for breast cancer patients according to different clinical scenarios (neoadjuvant and adjuvant partial breast irradiation, whole breast, chest wall and regional nodal irradiation) are reviewed and their advantages as well as challenging aspects discussed.

Estimation of secondary cancer projected risk after partial breast irradiation at the 1.5 T MR-linac

PURPOSE

For patients treated with partial breast irradiation (PBI), potential long-term treatment-related toxicities are important. The 1.5 T magnetic resonance guided linear accelerator (MRL) offers excellent tumor bed visualization and a daily treatment plan adaption possibility, but MRL-specific electron stream and return effects may cause increased dose deposition at air-tissue interfaces. In this study, we aimed to investigate the projected risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancies (RISM) in patients treated with PBI at the 1.5 T MRL.

METHODS

Projected excess absolute risk values (EARs) for the contralateral breast, lungs, thyroid and esophagus were estimated for 11 patients treated with PBI at the MRL and compared to 11 patients treated with PBI and 11 patients treated with whole breast irradiation (WBI) at the conventional linac (CTL). All patients received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions. For patients treated at the CTL, additional dose due to daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was simulated. The t‑test with Bonferroni correction was used for comparison.

RESULTS

The highest projected risk for a radiation-induced secondary cancer was found for the ipsilateral lung, without significant differences between the groups. A lower contralateral breast EAR was found for MRL-PBI (EAR = 0.89) compared to CTL-PBI (EAR = 1.41, p = 0.01), whereas a lower thyroid EAR for CTL-PBI (EAR = 0.17) compared to MRL-PBI (EAR = 0.33, p = 0.03) and CTL-WBI (EAR = 0.46, p = 0.002) was observed. Nevertheless, when adding the CBCT dose no difference between thyroid EAR for CTL-PBI compared to MRL-PBI was detected.

CONCLUSION

Better breast tissue visualization and the possibility for daily plan adaption make PBI at the 1.5 T MRL particularly attractive. Our simulations suggest that this treatment can be performed without additional projected risk of RISM.