A critical view of the use of predictive energy equations for the identification of hypermetabolism in motor neuron disease: A pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

People living with motor neuron disease (MND) frequently struggle to consume an optimal caloric intake. Often compounded by hypermetabolism, this can lead to dysregulated energy homeostasis, prompting the onset of malnutrition and associated weight loss. This is associated with a poorer prognosis and reduced survival. It is therefore important to establish appropriate nutritional goals to ensure adequate energy intake. This is best done by measuring resting energy expenditure (mREE) using indirect calorimetry. However, indirect calorimetry is not widely available in clinical practice, thus dietitians caring for people living with MND frequently use energy equations to predict resting energy expenditure (pREE) and estimate caloric requirements. Energy prediction equations have previously been shown to underestimate resting energy expenditure in over two-thirds of people living with MND. Hypermetabolism has previously been identified using the metabolic index. The metabolic index is a ratio of mREE to pREE, whereby an increase of mREE by ≥110% indicates hypermetabolism. We aim to critically reflect on the use of the Harris-Benedict (1919) and Henry (2005) energy prediction equations to inform a metabolic index to indicate hypermetabolism in people living with MND.

METHODS

mREE was derived using VO₂ and VCO₂ measurements from a GEMNutrition indirect calorimeter. pREE was estimated by Harris-Benedict (HB) (1919), Henry (2005) and kcal/kg/day predictive energy equations. The REE variation, described as the percentage difference between mREE and pREE, determined the accuracy of pREE ([pREE-mREE]/mREE) x 100), with accuracy defined as ≤ ± 10%. A metabolic index threshold of ≥110% was used to classify hypermetabolism. All resting energy expenditure data are presented as kcal/24hr.

RESULTS

Sixteen people living with MND were included in the analysis. The mean mREE was 1642 kcal/24hr ranging between 1110 and 2015 kcal/24hr. When REE variation was analysed for the entire cohort, the HB, Henry and kcal/kg/day equations all overestimated REE, but remained within the accuracy threshold (mean values were 2.81% for HB, 4.51% for Henry and 8.00% for kcal/kg/day). Conversely, inter-individual REE variation within the cohort revealed HB and Henry equations both inaccurately reflected mREE for 68.7% of participants, with kcal/kg/day inaccurately reflecting 41.7% of participants. Whilst the overall cohort was not classified as hypermetabolic (mean values were 101.04% for HB, 98.62% for Henry and 95.64% for kcal/kg/day), the metabolic index ranges within the cohort were 70.75%-141.58% for HB, 72.82%-127.69% for Henry and 66.09%-131.58% for kcal/kg/day, indicating both over- and under-estimation of REE by these equations. We have shown that pREE correlates with body weight (kg), whereby the lighter the individual, the greater the underprediction of REE. When applied to the metabolic index, this underprediction biases towards the classification of hypermetabolism in lighter individuals.

CONCLUSION

Whilst predicting resting energy expenditure using the HB, Henry or kcal/kg/day equations accurately reflects derived mREE at group level, these equations are not suitable for informing resting energy expenditure and classification of hypermetabolism when applied to individuals in clinical practice.

989 IS DIET QUALITY AS IMPORTANT AS DIET QUANTITY IN THE OLDER ADULT? MICRONUTRIENT DEFICIENCY, FRAILTY AND SARCOPENIA

Introduction

Dietary research in older adults has focused on energy content, macronutrient composition and diet quantity. Dietary antioxidants can theoretically ameliorate oxidative stress, which is widely implicated in age-related degeneration. Additional vital micronutrients are magnesium, being a co-factor for antioxidant enzyme function, and potassium, given its role in nerve and muscle function, and fluid balance. This study sought to investigate diet quality, specifically micronutrient content, and independent nutritional risk factors for frailty and sarcopenia.

Method

Secondary analysis of NUTRICOM 2015–2018 study participants (NIHR 19045)—exploring the impact of malnutrition on community-dwelling older adults—was conducted. Dietary intake was assessed using multiple-pass 24-hour dietary recall, nutrition risk status (NRS) using Guy’s and St Thomas’ NRS Tool, frailty using the 7-point Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and sarcopenia using EWGSOP2 handgrip strength cut-offs. Mann–Whitney U-Test assessed differences in dietary intake between malnutrition risk groups. Multivariable regression models, adjusting for age, gender, deprivation and comorbidities, established nutritional correlates of frailty and sarcopenia.

Results

142 participants; mean age 77.4(SD 8.4) years, 83(59%) female, mean BMI 26.05(SD 5.35). 79%–91% of older adults showed dietary deficiency in zinc, selenium, copper, magnesium and potassium. CFS increase was independently associated with NRS, and deficiency of potassium, copper and cumulative micronutrients, by 1.52, 1.19, 0.82 and 0.28 respectively (p < 0.05). Individuals with dietary zinc deficiency were 3.25 times more likely to have sarcopenia than individuals with sufficient zinc intake (95%CI: 1.04–10.16, p = 0.042).

Conclusion

Routine nutrition risk screening (accounting for macronutrient intake) finds only about 5% of older adults to be at-risk of malnutrition, whilst assessment of dietary intake in this study suggests dietary micronutrient deficiency is very common and is associated with increased frailty. 24-hour recall only provides a snapshot of dietary intake; further studies should be conducted using method that measure habitual dietary intake e.g. 7-day dietary diary.

Strategies to ensure continuity of nutritional care in patients with COVID-19 infection on discharge from hospital: A rapid review

Background & aims

The risk of malnutrition in people with COVID-19 is high; prevalence is reported as 37% in general medical inpatients, 53% in elderly inpatients and 67% in ICU. Thus, nutrition is a crucial element of assessment and treatment. This rapid review aimed to evaluate what evidence is available to inform evidence-based decision making on the nutritional care of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 infection.

Methods

Cochrane Rapid Reviews guidance was followed; the protocol was registered (CRD42020208448). Studies were selected that included patients with COVID-19, pneumonia, respiratory distress syndrome and acute respiratory failure, in hospital or the community, and which examined nutritional support. All types of studies were eligible for inclusion except non-systematic reviews, commentaries, editorials and single case studies. Six electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, CINAHL and MedRxiv.

Results

Twenty-six articles on COVID-19 were retrieved, including 11 observational studies, five guidelines and 10 opinion articles. Seven further articles on pneumonia included three RCTs, one unblinded trial, three observational studies, and one systematic review on rehabilitation post-ICU admission for respiratory illness. The evidence from these articles is presented narratively and used to guide the nutritional and dietetic care process.

Conclusions

Older patients with COVID-19 infection are at risk of malnutrition and addressing this may be important in recovery. The use of nutritional management strategies applicable to other acute conditions are recommended. However, traditional screening and implementation techniques need to be modified to ensure infection control measures can be maintained. The most effective nutritional interventions require further research and more detailed guidance on nutritional management post-discharge to support long-term recovery is needed.

Systematic review of nutrition support interventions in adult haematology and oncology patients receiving CAR T cell therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a novel adoptive immunotherapy that is revolutionising the treatment of haematological malignancies and solid tumours. Maintaining a patient's nutritional status and implementing nutrition support interventions have been shown to improve certain patient outcomes in standard anti-cancer therapies; however, guidance for nutrition support interventions in CAR T cell therapy are lacking. The primary aim of this review was to determine the impact of nutrition support interventions on patient-centred outcomes for adult CAR T cell therapy haematology and oncology patients. The patient-centred outcomes of interest included nutritional status and dietary intake, morbidity, functional status, and mortality. Our secondary aim was to describe the nutrition implications that have been acknowledged (but not fully evaluated) in CAR T cell therapy, and to guide future research and practice.

METHODS

Four electronic databases (CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE and CINAHL) were searched to January 2021, with additional records identified through handsearching and snowballing. Studies considered eligible for inclusion were randomised control trials (RCT), quasi-RCTs, cohort and observational studies, assessing nutrition support interventions (oral, enteral and/or parenteral) in adult haematology and oncology patients receiving CAR T cell therapy or adoptive immunotherapy. No publication status, year or language restrictions were applied.

RESULTS

Two authors reviewed the title and abstracts of 1181 retrieved records; however no studies were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

We are currently unable to identify if there is an association between nutrition support interventions and outcomes in CAR T cell therapy for adults with haematological malignancies or solid tumours. Lower quality clinical studies and animal models were identified that permitted us to qualitatively describe the risks for poor nutritional status in this population. This empty review confirms the need for research into the potential impact of nutrition support in CAR T cell therapy, including well-designed RCTs.

The role of non-dietetic healthcare professionals in managing interventions among adults at risk of malnutrition: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is estimated to affect over three million people in the UK resulting in serious consequences on both the individuals' health and healthcare system. While dietitians are uniquely qualified to provide nutritional interventions, they have one of the lowest workforce numbers in the NHS making it difficult to tackle the malnutrition burden alone. Thus, innovative ways of working are needed. Non-dietetic health care professionals are often involved in the identification, assessment and treatment of malnutrition and research has shown benefits of their involvement in identification and management of nutritional issues, however their role in delivering nutritional interventions has not yet been evaluated. The aim of this systematic review is to collate evidence on the potential roles and effectiveness of non-dietetic healthcare professionals in providing nutritional interventions and their impact on patient-centred outcomes in malnourished or at-risk individuals.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were searched on 10th October 2019. Titles and abstracts were initially screened, followed by full texts, against inclusion criteria and included/excluded studies by two authors independently. Data were extracted and tabulated where possible and grouped according to type of intervention and outcomes. Risk of bias and quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Data were combined in the form of a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Eighteen eligible studies were included; five involved feeding assistance, 10 involved implementing individualised nutrition monitoring or care plans and three were multi-factorial interventions. Interventions took place in a range of settings including hospital and long term care facilities. Very low and low quality evidence suggests that non-dietetic HCP interventions may improve weight, percent of patients reaching estimated energy requirements, quality of life, falls and frailty rate and patient satisfaction. Very low quality evidence suggests that non-dietetic HCP interventions may not improve mid-arm circumference, energy or protein intake, activities of daily living, handgrip strength or length of hospital stay. Low quality evidence suggests that non-dietetic HCP interventions have no effect on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

A lack of good quality evidence on the effectiveness of non-dietetic HCP delivered interventions on the management of malnutrition in adults makes it difficult to draw conclusions. However, this review has highlighted the types of interventions and potential roles of non-dietetic HCPs, providing a groundwork for further high-quality research such as feasibility studies in this area, for the effective management of malnutrition within clinical and community practice.

A UK survey of nutritional care pathways for patients with COVID-19 prior to and post-hospital stay

Background

During the global COVID‐19 pandemic, UK dietitians have delivered the best care to help patients recover from the infection. The present study examined the development and evaluation of care pathways to manage nutritional care of patients following COVID‐19 infection prior to and after discharge.

Methods

Registered UK dietitians completed an online questionnaire comprising 26 questions about the development of a pathway, its use, evaluation and training needs.

Results

Of 57 responses from organisations, 37 (65%) were involved in the planning/management of nutritional care. Only 19 responses had a new or adapted COVID‐19 pathway. Of these, 74% reported involvement of dietetic services, 47% reported > 1 eligibility criteria for pathway inclusion and 53% accepted all positive or suspected cases. All respondents used nutritional screening, first‐line dietary advice (food first) and referral for further advice and monitoring. Weight and food intake were the most used outcome measure. All pathways addressed symptoms related to nutrition, with the most common being weight loss with poor appetite, not being hungry and skipping meals in 84% of pathways. Over half of respondents (54%) planned to evaluate their pathway and 83% reported that they were ‘very or reasonably confident’ in their team's nutritional management of COVID‐19. Less than half (42%) reported on training needs.

Conclusions

Despite challenges encountered, pathways were developed and implemented. Dietitians had adapted to new ways of working to manage nutritional care in patients prior to and after discharge from hospital following COVID‐19 infection. Further work is needed to develop strategies for evaluation of their impact.

Interventions to Support Older People's Involvement in Activities Related to Meals. A Systematic Review

The objective of this systematic review is to assess whether old people should be actively involved in activities related to meals to support quality of life, nutritional status and functional abilities related to meals. Two electronic databases Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness were searched, supported by PubMed citation, snowball searches. Eleven primary studies were included. The quality was low. No studies assessed the effect on health-related quality of life. Three types of interventions to support activities related to meals were identified: Meal-related activities to facilitate improved autonomy seemed to overall improve nutritional intake, physical and social function related to meals, plus mealtime coping. Interventions of encouragement and reinforcement by staff to facilitate independence in eating seemed to have beneficial effect on nutritional intake and physical function related to meals. Interventions using food preparation and cooking to support participation seemed to have beneficial effects on social function related to meals and mealtime coping. There is an urgent need for good quality, adequately powered studies in this area and among old people in all health care settings.

Quality of the Evidence Supporting the Role of Oral Nutritional Supplements in the Management of Malnutrition: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

There is considerable heterogeneity across the findings of systematic reviews of oral nutritional supplement (ONS) interventions, presenting difficulties for healthcare decision-makers and patients alike. It is not known whether heterogeneity arises from differences in patient populations or relates to methodological rigor. This overview aimed to collate and compare findings from systematic reviews of ONSs compared with routine care in adult patients who were malnourished or at risk of malnutrition with any clinical condition and to examine their methodological quality. Three electronic databases were searched to July 2019, supplemented with hand-searching. Data on all outcomes were extracted and review methodological quality assessed using A MeaSurement Tool for Assessment of systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). Twenty-two reviews were included, 11 in groups from mixed clinical backgrounds and 11 in specific clinical conditions. Ninety-one meta-analyses were identified for 12 different outcomes but there was discordance between results. Significant benefits of ONSs were reported in 4 of 4 analyses of energy intake, 7 of 11 analyses of body weight, 7 of 22 analyses of mortality, 10 of 17 analyses of complications (total and infectious), 1 of 3 analyses of muscle strength, 4 of 9 analyses of body composition/nutritional status, 2 of 14 analyses of length of stay, and 2 of 5 analyses of hospital readmissions. Ten reviews were high quality (AMSTAR scores 8-11), 9 moderate (AMSTAR scores 3-8), and 3 poor (AMSTAR scores 0-3). Methodological deficiencies were limitations to searches, poor reporting of heterogeneity, and failure to incorporate quality of evidence into any recommendations. Discordance between reviews was not markedly reduced when only high-quality reviews were considered. Evidence for the effects of ONS in malnourished patients or those who are at risk of malnutrition is uncertain, and discordance in results can arise from differences in clinical background of patients or the etiological basis of malnutrition.

Determining the prevalence and severity of cancer cachexia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer and its relationship with chemotherapy outcomes

PURPOSE

Cancer cachexia (CC) is a syndrome characterised by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass associated with reduced tolerance to treatment. This study explored the prevalence and severity of CC in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and determined its relationship with chemotherapy outcomes.

METHODS

CC was classified into a four-stage model: no cachexia, pre-cachexia (PC), cachexia and refractory cachexia (RC) with categorisation determined from biochemical and body composition and performance assessment. Associations between the stage of cachexia and chemotherapy outcomes including radiological response, the number of chemotherapy cycles completed and the number of cycles delayed or dose reduced were explored.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included with 4 (18%) classified as having no cachexia, 4 (18%) PC, 3 (14%) cachexia (13.6%), and 11 (50%) RC. No association was observed between the stage of cachexia and the radiological response to chemotherapy number of cycles delayed or the number of cycle's dose reduced; however, there was an association with the number of cycles completed (p = 0.030). An association between C-reactive protein (CRP) and the number of chemotherapy cycles completed (p = 0.044) and the number of dose reductions (p = 0.044) was also identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited conclusions can be drawn given the small sample size. However, the majority of patients presented with some degree of cachexia at diagnosis. A relationship was identified between the increasing severity of cachexia and a lower number of chemotherapy cycles completed, as well as between CRP and the number of chemotherapy cycles completed and the number of dose reductions required, and therefore warrants further exploration in larger studies.

Effect of two different nutritional supplements on postprandial glucose response and energy- and protein intake in hospitalised patients with COPD: A randomised cross-over study

INTRODUCTION

Oral nutrition support is frequently used in treatment of malnutrition in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Considering the use of corticoidsteroids in patients with COPD, little is known about the effect on postprandial glucose response and if they might interfere with glucose control. Our aims were to compare the effect of a liquid oral nutritional supplement (ONS) and semi solid inbetween meal snack (snack) on postprandial glucose and energy- and protein intake, and to compare the effect of timing of each intervention on postprandial glucose and energy- and protein intake.

METHODS

Patients with COPD (n = 17) admitted to the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Iceland and defined as at low or medium nutritional risk (score 0-3) were recruited. In a randomised cross-over design, subjects consumed ONS or snack either in a fasting state (study 1) or following breakfast (study 2) and postprandial glucose responses were assessed at regular intervals for two hours (t = 15, t = 30, t = 45, t = 60, t = 90, t = 120 min). Energy- and protein intake was estimated using a validated plate diagram sheet. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to compare the two interventions.

RESULTS

In study 2, following breakfast, postprandial glucose was significantly higher after consuming ONS than the snack after 60 min (9.7 ± 2.4 mmol/L vs. 8.2 ± 3.2 mmol/L, p = 0.013 and 120 min 9.2 ± 3.2 mmol/L vs. 7.9 ± 2.4 mmol/L, p = 0.021, respectively). No difference was found in postprandial glucose concentrations between ONS and the snack when consumed after overnight fasting (study 1). No difference in energy or protein intake from hospital food was seen between supplement types neither in study 1 or 2.

CONCLUSION

Lower postprandial glucose concentrations were associated with the snack compared to ONS when taken after a meal compared to either type directly after overnight fasting. The clinical relevance of higher postprandial blood glucose after consuming a liquid ONS after breakfast compared with a semi solid snack needs to be studied further.

ESPEN guidelines on nutritional support for polymorbid internal medicine patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Polymorbidity (also known as multimorbidity) - defined as the co-occurrence of at least two chronic health conditions - is highly prevalent, particularly in the hospitalized population. Nonetheless, clinical guidelines largely address individual diseases and rarely account for polymorbidity. The aim of this project was to develop guidelines on nutritional support for polymorbid patients hospitalized in medical wards.

METHODS

The methodology used for the development of the current project follows the standard operating procedures for ESPEN guidelines. It started with an initial meeting of the Working Group in January 2015, where twelve key clinical questions were developed that encompassed different aspects of nutritional support: indication, route of feeding, energy and protein requirements, micronutrient requirements, disease-specific nutrients, timing, monitoring and procedure of intervention. Systematic literature searches were conducted in three different databases (Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library), as well as in secondary sources (e.g. published guidelines), until April 2016. Retrieved abstracts were screened to identify relevant studies that were used to develop recommendations, which were followed by submission to Delphi voting rounds.

RESULTS

From a total of 4532 retrieved abstracts, 38 relevant studies were analyzed and used to generate a guideline draft that proposed 22 recommendations and four statements. The results of the first online voting showed a strong consensus (agreement of >90%) in 68% of recommendations and 75% of statements, and consensus (agreement of >75-90%) in 32% of recommendations and 25% of statements. At the final consensus conference, a consensus greater than 89% was reached for all of the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the methodological difficulties in creating non-disease specific guidelines, the evidence behind several important aspects of nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients was reviewed and summarized into practical clinical recommendations. Use of these guidelines offer an evidence-based nutritional approach to the polymorbid medical inpatient and may improve their outcomes.

The effect of nutrition training for health care staff on learner and patient outcomes in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Nutrition training for health care staff has been prioritized internationally as a key means of tackling malnutrition; however, there is a lack of clear evidence to support its implementation. Systematic reviews in other fields of training for health care staff indicate that training strategies may have a beneficial impact on learner and patient outcomes.Objectives: We assessed whether nutrition training for health care staff caring for nutritionally vulnerable adults resulted in improved learner and patient outcomes and evaluated the effectiveness of different training strategies.Design: A systematic review of trials of nutrition training for health care staff was conducted. Six databases were searched with key terms relating to malnutrition and nutrition training. Studies were categorized according to cognitive (didactic teaching), behavioral (practical implementation of skills), and psychological (individualized or group feedback and reflection) training strategies. Where sufficient data were available, meta-analysis was performed according to study design and training strategy. All study designs were eligible. The risk of bias was evaluated in accordance with Cochrane guidance.Results: Twenty-four studies met the eligibility criteria: 1 randomized controlled trial, 4 nonrandomized controlled trials, 3 quasi-experimental trials, 13 longitudinal pre-post trials, 2 qualitative studies, and 1 cross-sectional survey. Results from a number of low-quality studies suggest that nutrition training for health care staff may have a beneficial effect on staff nutrition knowledge, practice, and attitude as well as patient nutritional intake. There were insufficient data to determine whether any particular training strategy was more effective than the others.Conclusions: In the absence of high-quality evidence, low-quality studies suggest that nutrition training for health care staff has some positive effects. However, further randomized controlled trials are required to confirm overall efficacy and to explore the impact of training strategies on learner and patient outcomes.

Two components of the new ESPEN diagnostic criteria for malnutrition are independent predictors of lung function in hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

INTRODUCTION

Low fat free mass index (FFMI) is a component of the ESPEN diagnosis criteria of malnutrition, that only when accompanied with weight loss is considered to be a determinant of malnutrition. Our aims were to assess the prevalence of malnutrition in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) applying the ESPEN criteria, and to examine the ability of different components of the criteria to predict COPD severity, length of stay (LOS), hospital readmissions within 30 days and mortality.

METHODS

Subjects were COPD patients (n = 121) admitted to Landspitali University Hospital from March 2015 to March 2016. Patients were screened for nutritional risk using Icelandic screening tool (ISS) and NRS-2002. Body composition was measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Lung function was measured by spirometry.

RESULTS

The prevalence of malnutrition according to the ESPEN criteria was 21%. The association between nutritional assessment, applying different components of the ESPEN criteria, and COPD severity was highly significant, with the highest risk being associated with low FFMI OR (95% CI) 4.77 (2.03, 11.20; p < 0.001). There was a trend towards higher risk of hospitalization for >7 days in subjects with low FFMI (OR 2.46 95% CI 0.92, 6.59; p = 0.074) and increased risk of 6 and 9 months' mortality (OR 2.72 95% CI 0.88, 8.39, P = 0.082 and OR 2.72 95% CI 0.94, 7.87, P = 0.065, respectively) in subjects diagnosed as malnourished by the ESPEN criteria.

CONCLUSION

This study describes the prevalence of malnutrition in hospitalized COPD patients using the ESPEN criteria from 2015. Our findings suggest that FFMI could be used independently of weight loss for the diagnosis of malnutrition in COPD patients, although there remain some problems associated with its measurement in the clinical setting.

Royal College of Physicians Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party evidence-based guidelines for the nutritional support of patients who have had a stroke

BACKGROUND

Stroke affects 15 million people each year worldwide and is one of the world's leading causes of death and physical disability. Stroke can result in a decline in nutritional status and this is associated with increased mortality and poor outcomes. The present work aimed to systematically review key aspects of the nutritional support of stroke patients at risk of malnutrition and to provide evidence-based guidelines for use in clinical practice. The work was conducted as part of the process to develop the 4th edition of the Royal College of Physicians' (RCP) 'National Clinical Guideline (NCG) for Stroke'.

METHODS

Questions were generated by the search team, together with contributions from members of the Virtual Stroke Group and the RCP Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party Guideline Development Group. Six questions covering several areas of nutritional support after stroke were defined and searches were conducted through to 31 October 2011 using five electronic databases (Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Web of Science). All included studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the van Tulder criteria for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the Quorum criteria for systematic reviews.

RESULTS

In total, 4215 abstracts were identified, 24 papers were reviewed and 13 systematic reviews and RCTs were included to provide evidence for the nutritional support components of the guidelines. For each question, evidence statements, recommendations and practical considerations were developed.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review process has resulted in the development of evidence-based guidelines for use in clinical practice and has identified areas for further research.

A review of the evidence for the impact of improving nutritional care on nutritional and clinical outcomes and cost

BACKGROUND

The association between malnutrition and poor clinical outcome is well-established, yet most research has focussed on the role of artificial nutritional support in its management. More recently, emphasis has been placed on the provision of adequate nutritional care, including nutritional screening and the routine provision of food and drink. The aim of this literature review is to establish the evidence for the efficacy of interventions that might result in improvements in nutritional and clinical outcomes and costs.

METHODS

A structured literature review was conducted investigating the role of nutritional care interventions in adults, and their effects on nutritional and clinical outcomes and costs, in all healthcare settings. Ten databases were searched electronically using keywords relating to nutritional care, patient outcomes and healthcare costs. High quality trials were included where available.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety-seven papers were identified and reviewed. Of these, only two randomised, controlled trials and six other trials were identified that addressed the major issues. A further 99 addressed some aspects of the provision of nutritional care, although very few formally evaluated nutritional or clinical outcomes and costs.

CONCLUSIONS

This review reveals a serious lack of evidence to support interventions designed to improve nutritional care, in particular with reference to their effects on nutritional and clinical outcomes and costs. The review suggests that screening alone may be insufficient to achieve beneficial effects and thus more research is required to determine the most cost-effective interventions in each part of the nutritional care pathway, in a variety of healthcare settings and across all age ranges, to impact upon nutritional and clinical outcomes.

Dietary advice for illness-related malnutrition in adults

BACKGROUND

Illness-related malnutrition has been reported in 10% to 55% of ill people in hospital and the community in areas of food sufficiency. Dietary advice encouraging the use of energy- and nutrient-rich foods rather than oral nutritional supplements has been suggested for managing illness-related malnutrition.

OBJECTIVES

To examine evidence that dietary advice to improve nutritional intake in adults with illness-related malnutrition improves survival, weight and anthropometry; to estimate the size of any additional effect of nutritional supplements given in combination with dietary advice.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant publications were identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. Additional studies were sought by contacting dietitians, clinicians and the manufacturers of nutritional supplements. Last search: September 2007

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of dietary advice in people with illness-related malnutrition compared with:(1) no advice;(2) oral nutritional supplements; and(3) dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-six studies (37 comparisons) met the inclusion criteria with 2714 randomised participants. Twelve trials (comparing dietary advice plus supplements if required with no advice) identified during searching are included as a separate comparison. Follow up ranged from 18 days to 24 months. No comparison showed a significant difference in mortality. There are several significant results for change in weight and other nutritional indices favouring nutritional intervention, but the precise contributions of the different strategies have yet to be determined. It is uncertain whether nutritional supplements and dietary advice produce the same effects. There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about clinical outcomes and cost. Few data were available for other outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the lack of evidence for the provision of dietary advice in managing illness-related malnutrition. Dietary advice plus nutritional supplements may be more effective than dietary advice alone or no advice in enhancing short-term weight gain, but whether this is sustainable, or whether survival and morbidity are improved remains uncertain. A large adequately-powered randomised controlled trial is needed comparing the efficacy of different therapies to increase dietary intake in people with illness-related malnutrition and examining the impact of this on clinical function and survival.

Controversies in the determination of energy requirements

To avoid any negative outcomes associated with under- or overfeeding it is essential to estimate nutrient requirements before commencing nutrition support. The energy requirements of an individual vary with current and past nutritional status, clinical condition, physical activity and the goals and likely duration of treatment. The evidence-base for prediction methods in current use, however, is poor and the equations are thus open to misinterpretation. In addition, most methods require an accurate measurement of current weight, which is problematic in some clinical situations. The estimation of energy requirements is so challenging in some conditions, e.g. critical illness, obesity and liver disease, that it is recommended that expenditure be measured on an individual basis by indirect calorimetry. Not only is this technique relatively expensive, but in the clinical setting there are several obstacles that may complicate, and thus affect the accuracy of, any such measurements. A review of relevant disease-specific literature may assist in the determination of energy requirements for some patient groups, but the energy requirements for a number of clinical conditions have yet to be established. Regardless of the method used, estimated energy requirements should be interpreted with care and only used as a starting point. Practitioners should regularly review the patient and reassess requirements to take account of any major changes in clinical condition, nutritional status, activity level and goals of treatment. There is a need for large randomised controlled trials that compare the effects of different levels of feeding on clinical outcomes in different disease states and care settings.

The development, validation and reliability of a nutrition screening tool based on the recommendations of the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nutrition screening tools (NST) identify individuals who are malnourished or at risk of becoming malnourished and who may benefit from nutritional support. The aims of this study were to design, pilot and evaluate a NST based on four nutritional parameters (weight, height, recent unintentional weight loss and appetite) recommended by the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition as the minimum required to identify patients with nutritional problems.

METHODS

A dietitian assessed the nutritional status of 100 patients admitted to the general medical wards. Results from the study were used to design a NST. The concurrent validity of the screening tool was then assessed, by comparing it with a nutritional assessment by an experienced dietitian in 100 patients admitted to acute medical and elderly care wards. The inter-rater reliability of the screening tool was also assessed using three nurses and 26 acute medical patients.

RESULTS

All four nutritional parameters were required to identify all at-risk patients. There was good agreement between the screening tool and the dietitian's assessment (kappa = 0.717) and inter-rater reliability was reasonable (mean kappa = 0.66).

CONCLUSION

The screening tool was valid and reliable in identifying medical patients at risk of malnutrition and was quick and simple to use.