Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of cyclosporine microemulsion in heart transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind comparison with the oil-based formulation of cyclosporine--results at 24 months after transplantation

BACKGROUND

The widespread use of cyclosporine has improved the survival of cardiac transplant patients as a result of reduced morbidity and mortality from rejection and infection. The original oil-based form of cyclosporine demonstrated unpredictable absorption resulting in an increased frequency of acute and chronic rejection in patients with poor bioavailability. The primary end. points of the present, prospective, randomized multicenter, double-blind trial were to compare the efficacy of the micro-emulsion form of cycolsporine (CsA-NL) with the oil-based formulation as determined by cardiac allograft and recipient survival and the incidence and severity of the acute rejection episodes and to determine the safety and tolerability of CsA-NL compared with Sandimmune CsA-(SM) in the study population. The 6-month analysis of the study showed reduced number of CsA-NL patients requiring antilymphocyte antibody therapy for rejection, fewer International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grade > or =3A rejections in female patients and fewer infections. Our report represents the final analysis of the results 24 months after transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 380 patients undergoing de novo cardiac transplants at 24 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of CsA-NL versus CsA-SM. Acute allograft rejection was diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy and graded according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation nomenclature. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Fisher's exact test were used for comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

After 24 months, allograft and recipient survival were identical in both groups. There were fewer CsA-NL patients (6.9%) requiring antilymphocyte antibody therapy for rejection than in the CsA-SM-treated patient group (17.7%, P=0.002). There were fewer discontinuations of study drug for treatment failures in the CsA-NL groups (7; 3.7%) compared with the CsA-SM group (18; 9.4%, P=0.037). The average corticosteroid dose was lower in the CsA-NL group (0.37 mg/kg/day) compared with the CsA-SM group (0.48 mg/kg/day, P=0.034) over the 24-month study period. Overall, there was no difference in blood pressure or creatinine between the two study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The final results of this multi-center, randomized study of two forms of cyclosporine confirmed that there were fewer episodes of rejection requiring antilymphocyte antibodies and fewer study discontinuations for treatment failures in CsA-NL-treated patients compared to those treated with CsA-SM. The use of CsA-NL did not predispose these patients to a higher risk of adverse events.

Safety, tolerability and efficacy of cyclosporine microemulsion in heart transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind comparison with the oil based formulation of cyclosporine--results at six months after transplantation

BACKGROUND

The introduction of cyclosporine has resulted in significant improvement in the survival of cardiac allograft recipients due to decreased mortality from infection and rejection. The original oil-based cyclosporine formulation exhibits variable and unpredictable bioavailability that correlates with an increased incidence of acute and chronic rejection in those patients in whom this is most pronounced. The primary objectives of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study in cardiac transplant patients were: to compare the efficacy of cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-NL) with oil-based cyclosporine (CsA-SM) as measured by cardiac allograft and recipient survival and the incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes; and to assess the safety and tolerability of CsA-NL compared with CsA-SM in this population. This report represents the analysis of results 6 months after transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 380 patients undergoing their first cardiac transplant at 24 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe were enrolled in this double-blind, randomized trial examining the safety and efficacy of CsA-NL versus CsA-SM. Rejection was diagnosed using endomyocardial biopsy and were graded according to standardized criteria of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Clinical parameters were monitored during the study. Survival and freedom from were used for analysis as was Fisher's exact test for comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

At 6 months after transplantation, allograft and patient survival were the same for both groups. The frequency of ISHLT grade 3A or greater episodes in the two groups was identical. Fewer CsA-NL patients (5.9%) required antilymphocyte antibody (ATG or OKT-3) therapy for rejection compared with the CsA-SM-treated patients (14.1%, P=0.01). Females with ISHLT rejection grade > or = 3A treated with CsA-NL had a 46% lower incidence of rejection compared with the CsA-SM-treated group (31.3% vs. 57.6%, P=0.032). Fewer infections were seen in the CsA-NL. With the exception of baseline and 1 week posttransplant creatinines which were higher in the CsA-NL group, the overall creatinine was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter, randomized study of cardiac transplant recipients documented less severe rejection (in particular those requiring antibody therapy) and a lower incidence of infection in CsA-NL-treated patients. Results from the female subgroup analysis suggest that the improved bioavailability of CsA-NL might reduce the frequency of rejection episodes in female patients. The use of CsA-NL was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events.

The electrocardiogram predicts one-year outcome of patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI III Registry ECG Ancillary Study. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction (MI).

BACKGROUND

Although the ECG is the most widely used test for evaluating patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI, little prospective information is available on its value in predicting outcome in the current era of aggressive medical and interventional therapy.

METHODS

ECGs with the qualifying episode of pain were analyzed in patients enrolled in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) III Registry, a prospective study of patients admitted to the hospital with unstable angina or non-Q wave MI.

RESULTS

New ST segment deviation > or = 1 mm was present in 14.3% of 1,416 enrolled patients, isolated T wave inversion in 21.9% and left bundle branch block (LBBB) in 9.0%. By 1-year follow-up, death or MI occurred in 11% of patients with > or = 1 mm ST segment deviation compared with 6.8% of patients with new, isolated T wave inversion and 8.2% of those with no ECG changes (p < 0.001 when comparing ST with no ST segment deviation). Two other high risk groups were identified: those with only 0.5-mm ST segment deviation and those with LBBB, whose rates of death or MI by 1 year were 16.3% and 22.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, ST segment deviation of either > or = 1 mm or > or = 0.5 mm remained independent predictors of death or MI by 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The admission ECG is very useful in risk stratifying patients with non-Q wave MI. The new criteria of not only > or = 1-mm ST segment deviation but also > or = 0.5-mm ST segment deviation or LBBB identify high risk patients, whereas T wave inversion does not add to the clinical history in predicting outcome.

Unstable angina--report from a Canadian expert roundtable

Unstable angina is generally considered to encompass a spectrum of symptomatic manifestations of ischemic heart disease, intermediate between stable angina and acute myocardial infarction. Approximately 75,000 Canadians are hospitalized yearly with unstable angina. The pathophysiology of unstable angina is still imperfectly understood, but is related to the same pathophysiological factors underlying myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. In March 1995 a group of Canadian cardiologists met to review the current understanding of unstable angina and to define a Canadian approach to this common problem. Important issues and questions regarding the diagnosis and management of unstable angina were defined. The objective was to outline approaches to the management of unstable angina that would be appropriate in Canada. Topics discussed included definition, incidence, clinical presentations, pathophysiology, initial diagnostic and risk stratification approaches, acute medical management, role of invasive interventions and long term management.

Platelet membrane receptor glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonism in unstable angina. The Canadian Lamifiban Study

BACKGROUND

Ligand binding to the platelet membrane receptor glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa, the final and obligatory step to platelet aggregation, can now be inhibited by pharmacological agents. This study was designed to evaluate the potential of lamifiban, a novel nonpeptide antagonist of GP IIb/IIIa, for the management of unstable angina.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a prospective, dose-ranging, double-blind study, 365 patients with unstable angina were randomized to an infusion of 1, 2, 4, or 5 micrograms/min of lamifiban or of placebo. Treatment was administered for 72 to 120 hours. Outcome events were measured during the infusion period and after 1 month. Concomitant aspirin was administered to all patients and heparin to 28% of patients. Lamifiban, all doses combined, reduced the risk of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or the need for an urgent revascularization during the infusion period from 8.1% to 3.3% (P = .04). The rates were 2.5%, 4.9%, 3.3%, and 2.4% with increasing doses. At 1 month, death or nonfatal infarction occurred in 8.1% of patients with placebo and in 2.5% of patients with the two high doses (P = .03). The highest dose of lamifiban additionally prevented the need for an urgent intervention. Lamifiban dose-dependently inhibited platelet aggregation. Bleeding times were significantly prolonged with platelet inhibition of > 80%. Major (but neither life-threatening nor intracranial) bleedings occurred in 0.8% of patients with placebo and 2.9% with lamifiban.

CONCLUSIONS

The nonpeptide GP IIb/IIIa antagonist lamifiban protected patients with unstable angina from severe ischemic events during a 3- to 5-day infusion and reduced the incidence of death and infarction at 1 month, suggesting considerable promise for this new therapeutic approach.

Influence of race, sex, and age on management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: The TIMI III registry

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the natural history and response to treatment of patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI).

DESIGN

Inception cohort.

SETTING

Patients in general community, primary care, or referral hospitals.

PATIENTS

All patients with an episode of unstable exertional chest pain or chest pain at rest presumed to be ischemic in origin lasting 5 minutes or more but without persisting ST-segment elevation greater than 30 minutes or the development of Q-waves were identified and enumerated in 18 participating hospitals. A subset of enumerated patients was selected to be followed prospectively using specific sampling strategies that would provide adequate numbers of black, women, and elderly (aged > or = 75 years) patients for comparison with their respective counterparts.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary analysis compared the incidence of death or MI at 42 days after entry into the prospective study according to race, sex, and age. Other outcomes considered were recurrent ischemia and the combined outcomes of death, MI, or recurrent ischemia by 42 days after entry.

RESULTS

A total of 8676 admissions with unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI were enumerated and, of these, 3318 patients were selected for the prospective study. The direct adjusted mean age of 3318 patients was 63.8 years. There were 943 blacks and 2375 nonblacks. Compared with nonblacks, blacks were less likely to be treated with intensive anti-ischemic therapy for their qualifying anginal episode and less likely to undergo invasive procedures (risk ratio [RR], 0.65%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.72; P<.001). However, of those who underwent angiography (45% of blacks and 61% of nonblacks), blacks had less extensive and severe coronary stenoses than nonblacks. The incidence of death and MI was similar for blacks and nonblacks, but blacks had a lower incidence of recurrent ischemia. There were 1678 men and 1640 women. Women were less likely than men to receive intensive anti-ischemic therapy and less likely to undergo coronary angiography (RR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.78; P<.001). Women had less severe and extensive coronary disease and were less likely to undergo revascularization, yet had a similar risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event by 6 weeks. There were 2490 patients aged 75 years or less and 828 patients aged more than 75 years. Elderly patients received less aggressive anti-ischemic therapy and were less likely to undergo coronary angiography than their younger counterparts. Elderly patients had more severe and extensive coronary disease but fewer revascularization procedures than younger patients and experienced a much higher incidence of adverse cardiac events both in hospital and by 6 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients presenting with acute ischemic chest pain without persistent ST-segment elevation, blacks appeared to have less severe coronary disease, received revascularization less frequently, and had less recurrent ischemia compared with nonblacks. Women were also found to have less severe coronary disease and were treated less intensely than men, but experienced similar outcomes. Elderly patients had more severe coronary disease than younger patients on coronary angiography, but were more likely to be treated medically, and they experienced far more adverse outcomes. These data suggest that more aggressive strategies should be directed to those patients with the greatest likelihood of adverse outcomes.