APOBEC mutagenesis, kataegis, chromothripsis in EGFR-mutant osimertinib-resistant lung adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Studies of targeted therapy resistance in lung cancer have primarily focused on single-gene alterations. Based on prior work implicating apolipoprotein b mRNA-editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) mutagenesis in histological transformation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers, we hypothesized that mutational signature analysis may help elucidate acquired resistance to targeted therapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

APOBEC mutational signatures derived from an Food and Drug Administration-cleared multigene panel [Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT)] using the Signature Multivariate Analysis (SigMA) algorithm were validated against the gold standard of mutational signatures derived from whole-exome sequencing. Mutational signatures were decomposed in 3276 unique lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), including 93 paired osimertinib-naïve and -resistant EGFR-mutant tumors. Associations between APOBEC and mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib were investigated. Whole-genome sequencing was carried out on available EGFR-mutant lung cancer samples (10 paired, 17 unpaired) to investigate large-scale genomic alterations potentially contributing to osimertinib resistance.

RESULTS

APOBEC mutational signatures were more frequent in receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-driven lung cancers (EGFR, ALK, RET, and ROS1; 25%) compared to LUADs at large (20%, P < 0.001); across all subtypes, APOBEC mutational signatures were enriched in subclonal mutations (P < 0.001). In EGFR-mutant lung cancers, osimertinib-resistant samples more frequently displayed an APOBEC-dominant mutational signature compared to osimertinib-naïve samples (28% versus 14%, P = 0.03). Specifically, mutations detected in osimertinib-resistant tumors but not in pre-treatment samples significantly more frequently displayed an APOBEC-dominant mutational signature (44% versus 23%, P < 0.001). EGFR-mutant samples with APOBEC-dominant signatures had enrichment of large-scale genomic rearrangements (P = 0.01) and kataegis (P = 0.03) in areas of APOBEC mutagenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

APOBEC mutational signatures are frequent in RTK-driven LUADs and increase under the selective pressure of osimertinib in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. APOBEC mutational signature enrichment in subclonal mutations, private mutations acquired after osimertinib treatment, and areas of large-scale genomic rearrangements highlights a potentially fundamental role for APOBEC mutagenesis in the development of resistance to targeted therapies, which may be potentially exploited to overcome such resistance.

Clinical definition of acquired resistance to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Acquired resistance (AR) to programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-(L)1] blockade is frequent in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in a majority of initial responders. Patients with AR may have unique properties of persistent antitumor immunity that could be re-harnessed by investigational immunotherapies. The absence of a consistent clinical definition of AR to PD-(L)1 blockade and lack of uniform criteria for ensuing enrollment in clinical trials remains a major barrier to progress; such clinical definitions have advanced biologic and therapeutic discovery. We examine the considerations and potential controversies in developing a patient-level definition of AR in NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 blockade. Taking into account the specifics of NSCLC biology and corresponding treatment strategies, we propose a practical, clinical definition of AR to PD-(L)1 blockade for use in clinical reports and prospective clinical trials. Patients should meet the following criteria: received treatment that includes PD-(L)1 blockade; experienced objective response on PD-(L)1 blockade (inclusion of a subset of stable disease will require future investigation); have progressive disease occurring within 6 months of last anti-PD-(L)1 antibody treatment or rechallenge with anti-PD-(L)1 antibody in patients not exposed to anti-PD-(L)1 in 6 months.

Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumours harbour activating mutations within the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) frequently derive significant clinical and radiographic benefits from treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). As such, prospective identification of EGFR mutations is now the standard of care worldwide. However, acquired therapeutic resistance to these agents invariably develops. Over the past 10 years, great strides have been made in defining the molecular mechanisms of EGFR TKI resistance in an effort to design rational strategies to overcome this acquired drug resistance. Approximately 60% of patients with acquired resistance to the EGFR TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib) develop a new mutation within the drug target. This mutation-T790M-has been shown to alter drug binding and enzymatic activity of the mutant EGF receptor. Less common mechanisms of acquired resistance include MET amplification, ERBB2 amplification, transformation to small-cell lung cancer, and others. Here, we present a condensed overview of the literature on EGFR-mutant NSCLC, paying particular attention to mechanisms of drug resistance, recent clinical trial results, and novel strategies for identifying and confronting drug resistance, while also striving to identify gaps in current knowledge. These advances are rapidly altering the treatment landscape for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, expanding the armamentarium of available therapies to maximize patient benefit.

Emergence of EGFR G724S mutation in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma post progression on osimertinib

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are drivers for a subset of lung cancers. Osimertinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) recently approved for the treatment of T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, acquired resistance to osimertinib is evident and resistance mechanisms remain incompletely defined. The EGFR G724S mutation was detected using hybrid-capture based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and a hybrid-capture based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays in two cases of EGFR-driven lung adenocarcinoma in patients who had progressed on osimertinib treatment. This study demonstrates the importance of both tissue and blood based hybrid-capture based genomic profiling at disease progression to identifying novel resistance mechanisms in the clinic.

Abstract P3-03-03: An acquired HER2 T798I gatekeeper mutation induces resistance to neratinib in a patient with HER2 mutant-driven breast cancer

ERBB2, the gene encoding HER2, is mutated in 2-4% of breast cancers. The HER2 irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) neratinib has shown clinical activity against breast cancer cells harboring HER2 activating mutations. Here, we report for the first time an acquired gatekeeper HER2T798I mutation in a patient with HER2-mutant breast cancer after an initial exceptional response to neratinib.

A patient with ER+/PR+/HER2-negative invasive lobular breast cancer progressing on standard therapy was found to harbor a L869R kinase domain mutation in HER2. HER2L869R is homologous to the known activating mutation EGFRL861R/Q. MCF10A breast epithelial cells expressing HER2L869R displayed enhanced HER2-mediated signaling and were resistant to lapatinib and trastuzumab but sensitive to neratinib. The patient was enrolled in the phase II SUMMIT trial (NCT01953926) and treated with neratinib, achieving a partial response lasting 16 months before developing progression. Next gen sequencing of DNA from both a new skin metastasis and plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) identified HER2L869R (8.7% cfDNA), whereas a novel HER2T798I mutation was detected only in plasma at 1.3%. Deep sequencing of pre-therapy tumor tissue and plasma did not detect HER2T798I, suggesting that this mutation arose upon resistance. HER2T798I has not been reported in TCGA, COSMIC, or among plasma samples from 17,345 cancer patients subjected to digital DNA sequencing using the Guardant360 assay.

HER2T798I is homologous to the EGFRT790M, KITT670I and BCR-ABLT315I gatekeeper mutations known to mediate resistance to erlotinib/gefitinib and imatinib. To examine if HER2T798I mediates resistance to neratinib, we employed biochemical and biological assays and molecular modeling of wild-type (WT) HER2 and HER2T798I. Structural modeling showed the increased bulk of the isoleucine at position 798 would result in a steric clash with neratinib, thus reducing drug binding. We stably expressed HER2WT, HER2T798I, HER2L869R and HER2L869R/T798I in MCF10A cells and NR6 mouse fibroblasts. Neratinib (10-100 nM) blocked HER2-mediated signaling in cells expressing HER2WT or HER2L869R but did not in cells expressing HER2T798I. The EGFR irreversible TKI osimertinib (100 nM), which isselective for mutant EGFR (including EGFRT790M) and approved for treatment of NSCLC expressing EGFRT790M, failed to inhibit HER2WT, HER2L869R or HER2T798I. In contrast, either the EGFR/HER2 irreversible TKI afatinib or AZ5104, a metabolite of osimertinib, strongly blocked signaling induced by HER2WT, HER2L869R or HER2T798I. Cells expressing HER2T798M displayed a significantly higher IC50 to neratinib than cells expressing HER2WT, whereas afatinib or AZ5014 were very active against all cells (IC50&lt;10 nM).

Conclusions: The acquisition of a T798I gatekeeper mutation in HER2 upon development of clinical resistance to neratinib in a breast cancer with an initial activating mutation in HER2 strongly suggests that HER2L869R is a driver mutation. We speculate that HER2T798I may arise as a secondary mutation following response to effective HER2 TKIs in other cancers with HER2 activating mutations. Certain irreversible EGFR inhibitors may be effective in patients with HER2-driven breast cancer resistant to neratinib.

Citation Format: Hanker AB, Red Brewer M, Sheehan JH, Koch JP, Lanman R, Hyman DM, Cutler, Jr. RE, Lalani AS, Cross D, Lovly CM, Meiler J, Arteaga CL. An acquired HER2 T798I gatekeeper mutation induces resistance to neratinib in a patient with HER2 mutant-driven breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-03.

Localization of human Cdc25C is regulated both by nuclear export and 14-3-3 protein binding

Entry into mitosis requires activation of the Cdc2 protein kinase by the Cdc25C protein phosphatase. The interactions between Cdc2 and Cdc25C are negatively regulated throughout interphase and in response to G2 checkpoint activation. This is accomplished in part by maintaining the Cdc25 phosphatase in a phosphorylated form that binds 14-3-3 proteins. Here we report that 14-3-3 binding regulates the intracellular trafficking of Cdc25C. Although primarily cytoplasmic, Cdc25C accumulated in the nuclei of leptomycin B (LMB)-treated cells, indicating that Cdc25C is actively exported out of the nucleus. A mutant of Cdc25C that is unable to bind 14-3-3 was partially nuclear in the absence of LMB and its nuclear accumulation was greatly enhanced by LMB-treatment. A nuclear export signal (NES) was identified within the amino terminus of Cdc25C. Although mutation of the NES did not effect 14-3-3 binding, it did cause nuclear accumulation of Cdc25C. These results demonstrate that 14-3-3 binding is dispensable for the nuclear export of Cdc25C. However, complete nuclear accumulation of Cdc25C required loss of both NES function and 14-3-3 binding and this was accomplished both pharmacologically and by mutation. These findings suggest that the nuclear export of Cdc25C is mediated by an intrinsic NES and that 14-3-3 binding negatively regulates nuclear import.