1
|
Pilbeam C, Greenhalgh T, Potter CM. Ethnographic closeness: methodological reflections on the interplay of engagement and detachment in immersive ethnographic research. J R Anthropol Inst 2023; 29:820-839. [PMID: 38504823 PMCID: PMC10946599 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.14007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
With the reflexive turn in the social sciences, emotional engagement is an inevitable and crucial part of data-gathering and analysis. However, there is a glaring gap in methodological discussions to this end. Presenting ethnographic research into end of life with people living at home in England with heart failure, we argue for a methodological blend of engagement and detachment that shifts throughout the research process, and that sensory experience is a core part of engagement. We offer ethnographic examples which present and explore some alternatives to emotional engagement and objective detachment: (1) moving with participants to facilitate engagement during fieldwork through shared sensory experience; (2) detachment as a different way of relating when exiting the field and drawing participant relationships to a close; and (3) ethnographic closeness as the interplay of engagement and detachment in participant debriefing and data analysis. Based on well-established anthropological concepts, and taking both engagement and detachment as embodied and relational, we develop a notion of ethnographic closeness in which detachment is a necessary part. Our detailed methodological discussion thus offers theoretically grounded possibilities and alternatives for approaching and managing the core tension of 'how close is too close?' in ethnographic practice. Further contributions supporting researchers in navigating ethnographic research are needed.
Collapse
|
2
|
Dong D, Abramowitz S, Matta GC, Moreno AB, Nouvet E, Stolow J, Pilbeam C, Lees S, Yeoh EK, Gobat N, Giles-Vernick T. A rapid qualitative methods assessment and reporting tool for epidemic response as the outcome of a rapid review and expert consultation. PLOS Glob Public Health 2023; 3:e0002320. [PMID: 37889886 PMCID: PMC10610454 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Methods Sub-Group of the WHO COVID-19 Social Science Research Roadmap Working Group conducted a rapid evidence review of rapid qualitative methods (RQMs) used during epidemics. The rapid review objectives were to (1) synthesize the development, implementation, and uses of RQMs, including the data collection tools, research questions, research capacities, analytical approaches, and strategies used to speed up data collection and analysis in their specific epidemic and institutional contexts; and (2) propose a tool for assessing and reporting RQMs in epidemics emergencies. The rapid review covered published RQMs used in articles and unpublished reports produced between 2015 and 2021 in five languages (English, Mandarin, French, Portuguese, and Spanish). We searched multiple databases in these five languages between December 2020 and January 31, 2021. Sources employing "rapid" (under 6 months from conception to reporting of results) qualitative methods for research related to epidemic emergencies were included. We included 126 published and unpublished sources, which were reviewed, coded, and classified by the research team. Intercoder reliability was found to be acceptable (Krippendorff's α = 0.709). We employed thematic analysis to identify categories characterizing RQMs in epidemic emergencies. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (no. CRD42020223283) and Research Registry (no. reviewregistry1044). We developed an assessment and reporting tool of 13 criteria in three domains, to document RQMs used in response to epidemic emergencies. These include I. Design and Development (i. time frame, ii. Training, iii. Applicability to other populations, iv. Applicability to low resource settings, v. community engagement, vi. Available resources, vii. Ethical approvals, viii. Vulnerability, ix. Tool selection); II. Data Collection and Analysis (x. concurrent data collection and analysis, xi. Targeted populations and recruitment procedures); III. Restitution and Dissemination (xii. Restitution and dissemination of findings, xiii. Impact). Our rapid review and evaluation found a wide range of feasible and highly effective tools, analytical approaches and timely operational insights and recommendations during epidemic emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Dong
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Sharon Abramowitz
- Center for Global Health Science and Security, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Gustavo Corrêa Matta
- Department Interdisciplinary Centre for Public Health Emergencies NIESP/CEE, Center for Data Integration and Knowledge for Health, FIOCRUZ - Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Arlinda B. Moreno
- Department of Epidemiology and Quantitative Methods in Health, National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Elysée Nouvet
- School of Health Studies, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeni Stolow
- Department of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Caitlin Pilbeam
- ANU Medical School, School of Sociology, the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Shelley Lees
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - EK Yeoh
- School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Nina Gobat
- Country Readiness Strengthening, World Health Emergencies Program, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Tamara Giles-Vernick
- Anthropology & Ecology of Disease Emergence Unit, Department of Global Health, Institut Pasteur/Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Viana JN, Pilbeam C, Howard M, Scholz B, Ge Z, Fisser C, Mitchell I, Raman S, Leach J. Maintaining High-Touch in High-Tech Digital Health Monitoring and Multi-Omics Prognostication: Ethical, Equity, and Societal Considerations in Precision Health for Palliative Care. OMICS 2023; 27:461-473. [PMID: 37861713 DOI: 10.1089/omi.2023.0120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Advances in digital health, systems biology, environmental monitoring, and artificial intelligence (AI) continue to revolutionize health care, ushering a precision health future. More than disease treatment and prevention, precision health aims at maintaining good health throughout the lifespan. However, how can precision health impact care for people with a terminal or life-limiting condition? We examine here the ethical, equity, and societal/relational implications of two precision health modalities, (1) integrated systems biology/multi-omics analysis for disease prognostication and (2) digital health technologies for health status monitoring and communication. We focus on three main ethical and societal considerations: benefits and risks associated with integration of these modalities into the palliative care system; inclusion of underrepresented and marginalized groups in technology development and deployment; and the impact of high-tech modalities on palliative care's highly personalized and "high-touch" practice. We conclude with 10 recommendations for ensuring that precision health technologies, such as multi-omics prognostication and digital health monitoring, for palliative care are developed, tested, and implemented ethically, inclusively, and equitably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Noel Viana
- Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, College of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
- Responsible Innovation Future Science Platform, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Caitlin Pilbeam
- School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Mark Howard
- Monash Data Futures Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Department of Philosophy, School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Brett Scholz
- School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Zongyuan Ge
- Monash Data Futures Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Department of Data Science & AI, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Carys Fisser
- Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, College of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
- School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Imogen Mitchell
- School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health and Medicine, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
| | - Sujatha Raman
- Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, College of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Joan Leach
- Australian National Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, College of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pilbeam C, Walsh E, Barnes K, Scholz B, Olsen A, Stone L. Mapping young people's journeys through mental health services: A prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287098. [PMID: 37310960 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Mental ill health is a major health risk for young people. There is unmet need for mental health assessment and treatment across Australia despite significant investment in government-funded plans to cover mental health and youth-oriented services. Understandings of mental health care for young people are impeded by a lack of longitudinal research. Without this research, it is difficult to understand how services do or do not support the recovery of young people over time. This project will analyse the healthcare journeys of young people aged 16-25 years experiencing their first episode of mental ill health for which they have sought GP support, over 12 months in the Australian Capital Territory. The study team will recruit up to 25 diverse young people and their general practitioners (GPs), and conduct four qualitative semi-structured interviews over 12 months with each participant. GP interviews will explore their role in the mental health care and care coordination for the young person. Interviews with young people will explore experiences and perceptions of navigating the health system, and the supports and resources they engaged with during the 12-month period. In between interviews, young people will be asked to keep a record of their mental health care experiences, through their choice of media. Participant-produced materials will also form the basis for interviews, providing stimuli to discuss the lived experience of care. Through analysing the narratives of both young people and their GPs, the study will establish how young people understand value in mental health care delivery. The study will use longitudinal qualitative mapping of healthcare journeys to identify key barriers and enablers to establishing effective, person-centred health care for young people with mental ill health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Pilbeam
- School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Erin Walsh
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Katelyn Barnes
- Academic Unit of General Practice, ACT Health Directorate, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Brett Scholz
- School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Anna Olsen
- School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Louise Stone
- School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Health & Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wanat M, Borek AJ, Pilbeam C, Anthierens S, Tonkin-Crine S. Conducting rapid qualitative interview research during the COVID-19 pandemic-Reflections on methodological choices. Front Sociol 2022; 7:953872. [PMID: 36033982 PMCID: PMC9404483 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.953872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic has shown, setting up studies in time to gather relevant, real-world data enables researchers to capture current views and experiences, focus on practicalities on the ground, and deliver actionable results. Delivering high quality rapid studies in healthcare poses several challenges even in non-emergency situations. There is an expanding literature discussing benefits and challenges of conducting rapid research, yet there are relatively few examples related to methodological dilemmas and decisions that researchers may face when conducting rapid studies. In rapidly-changing emergency contexts, some of these challenges may be more easily overcome, while others may be unique to the emergency, magnified, or emerge in different ways. In this manuscript, we discuss our reflections and lessons learnt across the research process when conducting rapid qualitative interview studies in the context of a healthcare emergency, focusing on methodological issues. By this we mean the challenging considerations and pragmatic choices we made, and their downstream impacts, that shaped our studies. We draw on our extensive combined experience of delivering several projects during the COVID-19 pandemic in both single and multi-country settings, where we implemented rapid studies, or rapidly adapted an existing study. In the context of these studies, we discuss two main considerations, with a particular focus on the complexities, multiple facets, and trade-offs involved in: (i) team-based approaches to qualitative studies; and (ii) timely and rapid data collection, analysis and dissemination. We contribute a transparent discussion of these issues, describing them, what helped us to deal with them, and which issues have been difficult to overcome. We situate our discussion of arising issues in relation to existing literature, to offer broader recommendations while also identifying gaps in current understandings of how to deal with these methodological challenges. We thus identify key considerations, lessons, and possibilities for researchers implementing rapid studies in healthcare emergencies and beyond. We aim to promote transparency in reporting, assist other researchers in making informed choices, and consequently contribute to the development of the rapid qualitative research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Wanat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Aleksandra J. Borek
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Caitlin Pilbeam
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sibyl Anthierens
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary care manages a significant proportion of healthcare in the United Kingdom and should be a key part of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic response. AIM To assess preparedness for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by understanding GPs' perception of their ability to manage current and future service demand, set-up of triage processes, and training in Covid-19 infection prevention and control procedures. DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional survey of practicing GPs in the United Kingdom, with 2 rounds of data collection early in the pandemic. METHODS Online survey, scripted and hosted by medeConnect Healthcare, comprising 6 closed prompts on 7-point Likert scales, and an optional free-text component. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Free-text data were analysed thematically. RESULTS One thousand two GPs completed each round; 51 GPs completed free-text responses in March, and 64 in April. Quantitative data showed greatest confidence in triage of Covid-19 patients, and GPs were more confident managing current than future Covid-19 demand. GPs' responses were more optimistic and aligned in April than March. Free-text data highlighted that GPs were concerned about lack of appropriate personal protective equipment and personal risk of Covid-19 infection in March, and unmet needs of non-Covid-19 patients in April. In both rounds, GPs expressed feeling overlooked by government and public health bodies. CONCLUSION Guidance to support general practice clinicians to manage future waves of Covid-19 or other health emergencies must be tailored to general practice from the outset, to support clinicians to manage competing health demands, and mitigate impacts on primary care providers' wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Pilbeam
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - George Edwards
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom.,NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Meriel Raymond
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Van Hecke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nina Gobat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pilbeam C, Tonkin-Crine S, Martindale AM, Atkinson P, Mableson H, Lant S, Solomon T, Sheard S, Gobat N. How do Healthcare Workers 'Do' Guidelines? Exploring How Policy Decisions Impacted UK Healthcare Workers During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Qual Health Res 2022; 32:729-743. [PMID: 35094621 PMCID: PMC8801764 DOI: 10.1177/10497323211067772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
We describe how COVID-19-related policy decisions and guidelines impacted healthcare workers (HCWs) during the UK's first COVID-19 pandemic phase. Guidelines in healthcare aim to streamline processes, improve quality and manage risk. However, we argue that during this time the guidelines we studied often fell short of these goals in practice. We analysed 74 remote interviews with 14 UK HCWs over 6 months (February-August 2020). Reframing guidelines through Mol's lens of 'enactment', we reveal embodied, relational and material impacts that some guidelines had for HCWs. Beyond guideline 'adherence', we show that enacting guidelines is an ongoing, complex process of negotiating and balancing multilevel tensions. Overall, guidelines: (1) were inconsistently communicated; (2) did not sufficiently accommodate contextual considerations; and (3) were at times in tension with HCWs' values. Healthcare policymakers should produce more agile, acceptable guidelines that frontline HCWs can enact in ways which make sense and are effective in their contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Pilbeam
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care
Health Sciences, University of
Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care
Health Sciences, University of
Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research
Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance,
University of
Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Paul Atkinson
- Institute of Population Health,
University
of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Hayley Mableson
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary
and Ecological Sciences, University of
Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Suzannah Lant
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary
and Ecological Sciences, University of
Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Tom Solomon
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary
and Ecological Sciences, University of
Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sally Sheard
- Institute of Population Health,
University
of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nina Gobat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care
Health Sciences, University of
Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Borek AJ, Pilbeam C, Mableson H, Wanat M, Atkinson P, Sheard S, Martindale AM, Solomon T, Butler CC, Gobat N, Tonkin-Crine S. Experiences and concerns of health workers throughout the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A longitudinal qualitative interview study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264906. [PMID: 35294450 PMCID: PMC8926177 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the experiences and concerns of health workers (HWs), and how they changed, throughout the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. METHODS Longitudinal, qualitative study with HWs involved in patient management or delivery of care related to COVID-19 in general practice, emergency departments and hospitals. Participants were identified through snowballing. Semi-structured telephone or video interviews were conducted between February 2020 and February 2021, audio-recorded, summarised, and transcribed. Data were analysed longitudinally using framework and thematic analysis. RESULTS We conducted 105 interviews with 14 participants and identified three phases corresponding with shifts in HWs' experiences and concerns. (1) Emergency and mobilisation phase (late winter-spring 2020), with significant rapid shifts in responsibilities, required skills, and training, and challenges in patient care. (2) Consolidation and preparation phase (summer-autumn 2020), involving gradual return to usual care and responsibilities, sense of professional development and improvement in care, and focus on learning and preparing for future. (3) Exhaustion and survival phase (autumn 2020-winter 2021), entailing return of changes in responsibilities, focus on balancing COVID-19 and non-COVID care (until becoming overwhelmed with COVID-19 cases), and concerns about longer-term impacts of unceasing pressure on health services. Participants' perceptions of COVID-19 risk and patient/public attitudes changed throughout the year, and tiredness and weariness turned into exhaustion. CONCLUSIONS Results showed a long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK HWs' experiences and concerns related to changes in their roles, provision of care, and personal wellbeing. Despite mobilisation in the emergency phase, and trying to learn from this, HWs' experiences seemed to be similar or worse in the second wave partly due to many COVID-19 cases. The findings highlight the importance of supporting HWs and strengthening system-level resilience (e.g., with resources, processes) to enable them to respond to current and future demands and emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra J. Borek
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Caitlin Pilbeam
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley Mableson
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Marta Wanat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Atkinson
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Sheard
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Anne-Marie Martindale
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Solomon
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Neurology, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher C. Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nina Gobat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Hout D, Hutchinson P, Wanat M, Pilbeam C, Goossens H, Anthierens S, Tonkin-Crine S, Gobat N. The experience of European hospital-based health care workers on following infection prevention and control procedures and their wellbeing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0245182. [PMID: 35130294 PMCID: PMC8820620 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Working under pandemic conditions exposes health care workers (HCWs) to infection risk and psychological strain. A better understanding of HCWs’ experiences of following local infection prevention and control (IPC) procedures during COVID-19 is urgently needed to inform strategies for protecting the psychical and psychological health of HCWs. The objective of this study was therefore to capture the perceptions of hospital HCWs on local IPC procedures and the impact on their emotional wellbeing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. Methods Participants were recruited in two sampling rounds of an international cross-sectional survey. Sampling took place between 31 March and 17 April 2020 via existing research networks and between 14 May and 31 August 2020 via online convenience sampling. Main outcome measures were behavioural determinants of HCWs’ adherence to IPC guidelines and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, a validated scale of 0–100 reflecting emotional wellbeing. The WHO-5 was interpreted as a score below or above 50 points, a cut-off score used in previous literature to screen for depression. Results 2289 HCWs from 40 countries in Europe participated. Mean age was 42 (±11) years, 66% were female, 47% and 39% were medical doctors and nurses, respectively. 74% (n = 1699) of HCWs were directly treating patients with COVID-19, of which 32% (n = 527) reported they were fearful of caring for these patients. HCWs reported high levels of concern about COVID-19 infection risk to themselves (71%) and their family (82%) as a result of their job. 40% of HCWs considered that getting infected with COVID-19 was not within their control. This feeling was more common among junior than senior HCWs (46% versus 38%, P value < .01). Sufficient COVID-19-specific IPC training, confidence in PPE use and institutional trust were positively associated with the feeling that becoming infected with COVID-19 was within their control. Female HCWs were more likely than males to report a WHO-5 score below 50 points (aOR 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–1.8). Conclusions In Europe, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a differential impact on those providing direct COVID-19 patient care, junior staff and women. Health facilities must be aware of these differential impacts, build trust and provide tailored support for this vital workforce during the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise van Hout
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Paul Hutchinson
- Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United States of America
| | - Marta Wanat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Caitlin Pilbeam
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Herman Goossens
- Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sibyl Anthierens
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nina Gobat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Albury C, Pope C, Shaw S, Greenhalgh T, Ziebland S, Martin S, Rai T, Chisholm A, Barnes R, White A, Wanat M, Santillo M, Boylan AM, Tremblett M, Tonkin-Crine S, Borek A, Sanders R, Koutoukidis D, Scragg J, Lee C, Russell S, Mikulak M, Logan M, Spratt T, Livingston-Banks J, Mcniven A, Stepney M, Talbot A, Crocker J, Powell J, Paparini S, Van der Westhuizen HM, Walumbe J, Newhouse N, Ryan S, Webb H, Mellor K, Potter C, Butler A, Pilbeam C. Gender in the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33:6357106. [PMID: 34428303 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Albury
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Catherine Pope
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sara Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sue Ziebland
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sam Martin
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Tanvi Rai
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Alison Chisholm
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Rebecca Barnes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Ashley White
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Marta Wanat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Marta Santillo
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Boylan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Madeline Tremblett
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Aleksandra Borek
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Ruth Sanders
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Dimitrios Koutoukidis
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Jadine Scragg
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Charlotte Lee
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Siabhainn Russell
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.,Department of Social Care & Social Work, Faculty of Health, Psychology & Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6GX, UK
| | - Magdalena Mikulak
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.,Department of Social Care & Social Work, Faculty of Health, Psychology & Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6GX, UK
| | - Mary Logan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Tanisha Spratt
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | - Abigall Mcniven
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Melissa Stepney
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Amelia Talbot
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Joanna Crocker
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - John Powell
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sara Paparini
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | - Jackie Walumbe
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Nicola Newhouse
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sara Ryan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.,Department of Social Care & Social Work, Faculty of Health, Psychology & Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6GX, UK
| | - Helena Webb
- Department of Computer Science, Human Centred Computing (HCC), University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LW, UK
| | - Katie Mellor
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7HE, UK
| | - Caroline Potter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Health Services Research Unit, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Ailsa Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Caitlin Pilbeam
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pilbeam C, Malden D, Newell K, Dagens A, Kennon K, Michelen M, Gobat N, Sigfrid L. Accessibility, inclusivity, and implementation of COVID-19 clinical management guidelines early in the pandemic: a global survey. Wellcome Open Res 2021. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16984.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: With a rapidly changing evidence base, high-quality clinical management guidelines (CMGs) are key tools for aiding clinical decision making and increasing access to best available evidence-based care. A rapid review of COVID-19 CMGs found most lacked methodological rigour, overlooked at-risk populations, and varied in treatment recommendations. Furthermore, social science literature highlights the complexity of implementing guidelines in local contexts where they were not developed and the resulting potential to compound health inequities. This study aimed to evaluate access to, inclusivity of, and implementation of COVID-19 CMGs in different settings. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of clinicians worldwide was conducted from 15th June to 20th July 2020, to explore access to and implementation of COVID-19 CMGs, and treatment and supportive care recommendations provided. Data on accessibility, inclusivity, and implementation of CMGs were analysed by geographic location. Results: 76 clinicians from 27 countries responded: 82% from high-income countries, 17% from lower middle-income countries (LMICs). Most respondents reported access to COVID-19 CMGs and confidence in their implementation. However, many respondents, particularly from LMICs, reported barriers to implementation, including limited access to treatment and equipment. Only 20% of respondents reported having access to CMGs covering care for children, 25% for pregnant women, and 50% for older adults (>65 years). Identified themes were for CMGs to include recommendations for at-risk populations and settings, include supportive care guidance, and be updated as evidence emerges, and for clinicians to have training and access to recommended treatments to support implementation. Conclusion: Our findings highlight important gaps in COVID-19 CMG development and implementation challenges during a pandemic, particularly affecting at-risk populations and lower resourced settings. This study identifies an urgent need for an improved CMG development framework that is inclusive and adaptable to emerging evidence and considers contextual implementation support, to improve access to evidence-based care globally.
Collapse
|
12
|
Martindale AM, Pilbeam C, Mableson H, Tonkin-Crine S, Atkinson P, Borek A, Lant S, Gobat N, Solomon T, Sheard S. Perspectives on COVID-19 testing policies and practices: a qualitative study with scientific advisors and NHS health care workers in England. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1216. [PMID: 34167491 PMCID: PMC8224254 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11285-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As COVID-19 death rates have risen and health-care systems have experienced increased demand, national testing strategies have come under scrutiny. Utilising qualitative interview data from a larger COVID-19 study, this paper provides insights into influences on and the enactment of national COVID-19 testing strategies for health care workers (HCWs) in English NHS settings during wave one of the COVID-19 pandemic (March-August 2020). Through the findings we aim to inform learning about COVID-19 testing policies and practices; and to inform future pandemic diagnostic preparedness. METHODS A remote qualitative, semi-structured longitudinal interview method was employed with a purposive snowball sample of senior scientific advisors to the UK Government on COVID-19, and HCWs employed in NHS primary and secondary health care settings in England. Twenty-four interviews from 13 participants were selected from the larger project dataset using a key term search, as not all of the transcripts contained references to testing. Framework analysis was informed by the non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability of patient-facing health and care technologies implementation framework (NASSS) and by normalisation process theory (NPT). RESULTS Our account highlights tensions between the communication and implementation of national testing developments; scientific advisor and HCW perceptions about infectiousness; and uncertainties about the responsibility for testing and its implications at the local level. CONCLUSIONS Consideration must be given to the implications of mass NHS staff testing, including the accuracy of information communicated to HCWs; how HCWs interpret, manage, and act on testing guidance; and the influence these have on health care organisations and services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Marie Martindale
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England.
| | - Caitlin Pilbeam
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | - Hayley Mableson
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | - Paul Atkinson
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| | - Aleksandra Borek
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | - Suzannah Lant
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| | - Nina Gobat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| | - Tom Solomon
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| | - Sally Sheard
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Robinson J, Pilbeam C, Goodwin H, Raphael D, Waterworth S, Gott M. The impact of uncertainty on bereaved family's experiences of care at the end of life: a thematic analysis of free text survey data. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:60. [PMID: 33849502 PMCID: PMC8045268 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00748-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inequities in the provision of palliative care for people with cardiac disease have been well documented in the literature. Despite experiencing significant palliative care needs, those with cardiac disease are less likely to be referred to specialist palliative care services and more likely to die in a hospital when compared to those with cancer. The unpredictable trajectory of heart failure has been identified as a key barrier to providing palliative care with many people experiencing a long period of stability with appropriate medical treatment. However, as the disease progresses and cardiac function deteriorates, exacerbations of acute decompensation can lead to what is often perceived to be ‘sudden’ death. The aim of this study is to explore the impact of uncertainty on how death is remembered by bereaved family members of people with heart disease. Methods Thematic analysis of free text collected during a postal survey of bereaved family’s experiences of healthcare services in the last 3 months of life using the New Zealand version of the VOICES questionnaire was undertaken. Data was analysed using a three-dimensional conceptual framework of “scientific uncertainty”. Results Eight hundred and twenty-seven completed questionnaires were received of which 12.6% (n = 105) indicated that they had cared for someone at the end of life with cardiac disease. Experiences of uncertainty were found to have a significant impact upon bereaved family. Four key themes were identified; distrust in healthcare professionals, stories left incomplete, loss, regret and missed opportunity and disempowerment. Conclusions This study highlights the ongoing impact on bereaved family when uncertainty is not made explicit in conversations regarding end of life for people with heart disease. Timely and sensitive conversations regarding the uncertainty of when death may occur is an important factor in ensuring that bereaved family are not left with unresolved narratives. Reframing how we think and talk about uncertainty in end of life care is important, as clinicians’ uncertainties may not always reflect or match up with families’ uncertainties. Being explicit about our inability to be certain about the timing of death may thus lead to a more positive and complete experience for bereaved family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackie Robinson
- Faculty of Medical Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Caitlin Pilbeam
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hetty Goodwin
- Faculty of Medical Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Deborah Raphael
- Faculty of Medical Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Susan Waterworth
- Faculty of Medical Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Merryn Gott
- Faculty of Medical Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Atkinson P, Gobat N, Lant S, Mableson H, Pilbeam C, Solomon T, Tonkin-Crine S, Sheard S. Understanding the policy dynamics of COVID-19 in the UK: Early findings from interviews with policy makers and health care professionals. Soc Sci Med 2020; 266:113423. [PMID: 33069961 PMCID: PMC7540195 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The UK government response to COVID-19 has been heavily criticised. We report witnesses’ perceptions of what has shaped UK policies and how these policies have been received by healthcare workers. Such studies are usually affected by hindsight. Here we deploy a novel prospective approach to capture real-time information. We are historians, social scientists and biomedical researchers who study how societies cope with infectious disease. In February 2020 we began regular semi-structured calls with prominent members of policy communities, and health care professionals, to elicit their roles in, and reactions to, the pandemic response. We report witnesses’ perceptions that personal protective equipment (PPE) stocks were too small, early warnings have not led to sufficiently rapid policy decisions, and a lack of transparency is sapping public trust. Significant successes include research mobilisation. The early experiences and reactions of our witnesses suggest important issues for investigation, notably a perception of delay in decision making. UK coronavirus response delayed after the alarm was raised. Politicians abdicated responsibility by their early ‘follow the science’ rhetoric. Science advice to policy making needs people who bridge the two worlds. Centralised responses wasted valuable local public health skills. Pandemic response needs to move faster than the infectious disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - S Lant
- University of Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Frie K, Hartmann-Boyce J, Pilbeam C, Jebb S, Aveyard P. Analysing self-regulatory behaviours in response to daily weighing: a think-aloud study with follow-up interviews. Psychol Health 2019; 35:16-35. [PMID: 31198059 PMCID: PMC6961301 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1626394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To examine the extent to which people who are trying to lose weight naturally self-regulate in response to self-weighing and to identify barriers to self-regulation. Design/Main Outcome Measures: Twenty-four participants, who were overweight and trying to lose weight, recorded their thoughts during daily weighing for eight weeks. Semi-structured follow-up interviews assessed participant experiences. Qualitative analysis identified steps of the self-regulation process and barriers to self-regulation. Exploratory regression analysis assessed the relationship between the self-regulation steps and weight loss. Results: On 90% of 498 occasions, participants compared their weight measurement to an expectation or goal, and on 58% they reflected on previous behaviour. Action planning only occurred on 20% of occasions, and specific action planning was rare (6%). Only specific action planning significantly predicted weight loss (−2.1 kg per 1 SD increase in the predictor, 95% CI = −3.9, −0.3). Thematic analysis revealed that barriers to the interpretation of daily weight changes were difficulties in understanding day-to-day fluctuations, losing the overview of trends, forgetting to weigh, and forgetting previous measurements. Conclusion: Specific action planning can lead to weight loss, but is rare in a naturalistic setting. Barriers to self-regulation relate to the interpretation of weight changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Frie
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Caitlin Pilbeam
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Jebb
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Aveyard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pilbeam C, Hood-Moore V. Test-retest reliability of wrist joint position sense in healthy adults in a clinical setting. Physiotherapy 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.11.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
17
|
Buchanan DA, Denyer D, Jaina J, Kelliher C, Moore C, Parry E, Pilbeam C. How do they manage? A qualitative study of the realities of middle and front-line management work in health care. Health Services and Delivery Research 2013. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr01040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
This project addressed three questions. First, how are middle management roles in acute care settings changing, and what are the implications of these developments? Second, how are changes managed following serious incidents, when recommendations from investigations are not always acted on? Third, how are clinical and organisational outcomes influenced by management practice, and what properties should an ‘enabling environment’ possess to support those contributions?Data were gathered from around 1200 managers in six trusts through interviews, focus groups, management briefings, a survey with 600 responses, and serious incident case studies. For this project, ‘middle management’ meant any role below board level that included managerial responsibilities. Evidence provided by trust workforce information offices revealed that the management function is widely distributed, with > 30% of hospital staff holding either full-time management posts or ‘hybrid’ roles combining managerial with clinical or medical responsibilities. Hybrids outnumber full-time managers by four to one, but most have only limited management training, and some do not consider themselves to be managers. Management capabilities now at a premium include political skills, resilience, developing interprofessional collaboration, addressing ‘wicked problems’, performance management and financial skills.Case study evidence reveals multiple barriers to the implementation of change following serious incidents. These barriers relate to the complex causes of most incidents, the difficulties in establishing and agreeing appropriate action plans and the subsequent problems of implementing ‘defensive’ change agendas. The conclusions from these case studies suggest that the management of serious incidents could potentially be strengthened by adding a change management perspective to the current organisational learning focus, by complementing root cause and timeline analysis methods with ‘mess mapping’ processes and by exploring opportunities to introduce systemic changes and high-reliability methods in addition to fixing the root causes of individual incidents.Interview, focus group and survey evidence shows that middle managers are deeply committed but face increasing workloads with reduced resources, creating ‘extreme jobs’ with long hours, high intensity and fast pace. Such roles can be rewarding but carry implications for work–life balance and stress. Other pressures on middle management included rising patient and public expectations, financial challenges, burdensome regulation (external and internal), staffing problems, incompatible and dated information systems, resource and professional barriers to implementing change and problematic relationships with external agencies. Despite these pressures, management contributions included maintaining day-to-day performance, ‘firefighting’, ensuring a patient experience focus in decision-making, translating ideas into working initiatives, identifying and ‘selling’ new ideas, facilitating change, troubleshooting, leveraging targets to improve performance, process and pathway redesign, developing infrastructure (information technology, equipment, estate), developing others and managing external partnerships. Actions required to maintain an enabling environment to support those contributions would involve individual, divisional and organisational steps, most of which would be cost neutral.Recommendations for future research concern the assessment of management capacity, the advantages and drawbacks of service-line organisation structures, the incidence and implications of extreme managerial jobs, evaluating alternative serious incident investigation methods, and the applicability of high-reliability organisation perspectives in acute care settings.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kaneko H, Mehrotra M, Alander C, Lerner U, Pilbeam C, Raisz L. Effects of prostaglandin E2 and lipopolysaccharide on osteoclastogenesis in RAW 264.7 cells. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2007; 77:181-6. [PMID: 17951042 PMCID: PMC2836877 DOI: 10.1016/j.plefa.2007.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2007] [Accepted: 09/14/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostaglandins (PGs) can act on both hematopoietic and osteoblastic lineages to enhance osteoclast formation. METHODS We examined PGE2 stimulated osteoclastogenesis in RAW 264.7 cells and the role of endogenous PGE2 in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated osteoclastogenesis. RESULTS RANKL (1-100 ng/ml) increased formation of osteoclasts, defined as tartrate resistant acid phosphatase multinucleated cells, with peak effects at 30 ng/ml. Addition of PGE2 (0.01-1.0 microM) to RANKL (30 ng/ml) dose dependently increased osteoclast number 30-150%. Use of NS-398 (0.1 microM) or indomethacin (Indo, 1.0 micro M) to block endogenous PG synthesis had little effect on the response to RANKL alone but significantly decreased the response to PGE2. Addition of LPS (100 ng/ml) to RANKL increased osteoclast number 50%, and this response was significantly decreased by NS-398 and Indo. RANKL and PGE2 produced small, additive increases in COX-2 mRNA levels, while LPS produced a larger increase. PG release into the medium was not increased by RANKL and PGE2 but markedly increased by LPS. CONCLUSION We conclude that RANKL stimulated osteoclastogenesis can be enhanced by PGE2 and LPS though direct effects on the hematopoietic cell lineage and that these effects may be mediated in part by induction of COX-2 and enhanced intracellular PG production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Kaneko
- Musculoskeletal Institute, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sobue T, Gravely T, Hand A, Min YK, Pilbeam C, Raisz LG, Zhang X, Larocca D, Florkiewicz R, Hurley MM. Regulation of fibroblast growth factor 2 and fibroblast growth factor receptors by transforming growth factor beta in human osteoblastic MG-63 cells. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17:502-12. [PMID: 11874241 DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.3.502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) and its receptors (FGFRs) are important regulators of bone cell function. Although FGF-2 is a major modulator of bone cell function, its expression and regulation in human osteoblasts have not been investigated. We examined FGF-2 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and regulation in the human osteosarcoma MG-63 cells. Northern analysis revealed that MG-63 cells expressed FGF-2 mRNA transcripts of 7, 4, 2.2, and 1.3 kilobases (kb). In the absence of serum, treatment with transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta; 0.1-10 ng/ml) increased all FGF-2 mRNA transcripts. Maximal increase was seen with 1 ng/ml of TGF-beta. TGF-beta increased FGF-2 mRNA expression within 2 h and this was sustained for 24 h. Phorbal myristate acetate (PMA; 1 microM) also increased FGF-2 mRNA at 6 h. Time course studies showed that TGF-beta did not significantly alter FGFR1 or FGFR2 mRNA expression in MG-63 cells. Western blotting with anti-human FGF-2 revealed that MG-63 cells synthesize three isoforms of FGF-2 protein of approximately 18, 22/23, and 24 kDa, which were increased after either 6 h or 24 h of treatment with TGF-beta. Increased FGF-2 mRNA and protein expression in response to TGF-beta was markedly reduced by the protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor H-89. Immunogold labeling of MG-63 cells treated with TGF-beta showed increased labeling for FGF-2 and FGFR2 in the nuclei. In contrast, TGF-beta treatment significantly decreased FGFR1 labeling in the nuclei. These data show that TGF-beta regulates FGF-2 gene expression in human osteosarcoma cells. Furthermore, TGF-beta modulates the cellular localization of FGF-2 and its receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Sobue
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Okada Y, Voznesensky O, Herschman H, Harrison J, Pilbeam C. Identification of multiple cis-acting elements mediating the induction of prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 by phorbol ester in murine osteoblastic cells. J Cell Biochem 2000. [DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4644(20000801)78:2<197::aid-jcb3>3.0.co;2-c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
21
|
Okada Y, Voznesensky O, Herschman H, Harrison J, Pilbeam C. Identification of multiple cis-acting elements mediating the induction of prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 by phorbol ester in murine osteoblastic cells. J Cell Biochem 2000; 78:197-209. [PMID: 10842315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
The tumor promoter phorbol 13-myristate 12-acetate (PMA), the best characterized protein kinase C agonist, frequently regulates gene expression via activation of Fos/Jun (AP-1) complexes. PMA rapidly and transiently induces prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 (PGHS-2) expression in murine osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells, but no functional AP-1 binding motifs in the 5'-flanking region have been identified. In MC3T3-E1 cells transfected with -371/+70 bp of the PGHS-2 gene fused to a luciferase reporter gene (Pluc), PMA stimulates luciferase activity up to eightfold. Computer analysis of the sequence of the PGHS-2 promoter region identified three potential AP-1 elements in the -371/+70 bp region, and deletion analysis suggested that the sequence 5'-aGAGTCA-3' at -69/-63 bp was most likely to mediate stimulation by PMA. Mutation of the putative AP-1 sequence reduces the ability of PMA to stimulate Pluc activity by 65%. On electrophoretic mobility shift analysis (EMSA), PMA induces binding to a PGHS-2 probe spanning this sequence, binding is blocked by an unlabeled AP-1 canonical sequence, and antibodies specific for c-Jun and c-Fos inhibit binding. Mutation of this AP-1 site also causes a small (22%) but significant reduction in the serum stimulation of Pluc activity in transiently transfected MC3T3-E1 cells. On EMSA, serum induces binding to a PGHS-2 probe spanning the AP-1 site, binding is blocked by an unlabeled AP-1 canonical sequence, and antibodies specific for c-Jun and c-Fos inhibit binding. Joint mutation of this AP-1 site and the nearby CRE site at -56/-52 bp, previously shown to mediate serum, v-src and PDGF induction of PGHS-2 in NIH-3T3 cells, blocks both PMA and serum induction of Pluc activity in MC3T3-E1 cells. Hence, the AP-1 and CRE binding sites are jointly but differentially involved in both the PMA and serum stimulation of PGHS-2 promoter activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Okada
- University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pilbeam C, Rao Y, Voznesensky O, Kawaguchi H, Alander C, Raisz L, Herschman H. Transforming growth factor-beta1 regulation of prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 expression in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Endocrinology 1997; 138:4672-82. [PMID: 9348193 DOI: 10.1210/endo.138.11.5495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta) plays an important role in bone development and remodeling. TGFbeta stimulates PGE2 production, enhances interleukin-1-stimulated PGE2 production, and can stimulate PG-mediated bone resorption. We found that TGFbeta induced prostaglandin G/H synthase (PGHS-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) and PGE2 production in neonatal mouse calvarial cultures and in primary cells derived from these calvariae. We used MC3T3-E1 cells, an immortalized osteoblastic cell line derived from mouse calvariae, to examine the mechanism of PGHS-2 induction. PGHS-2 mRNA was rapidly induced by TGFbeta (10 ng/ml) in MC3T3-E1 cells; mRNA levels peaked at 4-8 h and were still elevated at 24 h. Induction of PGHS-2 protein and PGE2 production correlated with PGHS-2 mRNA levels. In contrast, TGFbeta had much less effect on PGHS-1 mRNA levels. Unlike the response to other agonists, PGHS-2 mRNA induction by TGFbeta was not enhanced by cycloheximide pretreatment, suggesting a requirement for new protein synthesis. To study transcriptional regulation, cells were stably transfected with a PGHS-2 promoter-luciferase reporter construct containing 371 bp of the 5'-flanking region and 70 bp of untranslated DNA from the PGHS-2 gene. TGFbeta-stimulated luciferase activity paralleled PGHS-2 mRNA induction. Stimulation of luciferase activity and PGHS-2 mRNA levels by other agonists, including interleukin-1, TGF alpha, forskolin, and phorbol 13-myristate 12-acetate, were enhanced by TGFbeta. A 90% drop in luciferase activity occurred with deletion of the region from -371 to -213 bp of the PGHS-2 promoter. The PG response to TGFbeta in MC3T3-E1 cells appears to be mediated primarily by transcriptional regulation of PGHS-2 expression through one or more cis-acting elements located between -371 and -213 bp in the 5'-flanking region of the PGHS-2 gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Pilbeam
- Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Harrison JR, Lorenzo JA, Kawaguchi H, Raisz LG, Pilbeam C. Stimulation of prostaglandin E2 production by interleukin-1 alpha and transforming growth factor alpha in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9:817-23. [PMID: 8079657 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650090607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The mechanism by which interleukin-1 (IL-1) and transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha) regulate prostaglandin synthesis has been examined in the clonal mouse osteoblastic cell line MC3T3-E1. Cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production was determined by radioimmunoassay or by prelabeling cells with [3H]arachidonic acid, followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of the labeled products released into the medium. Prostaglandin G/H synthase (PGHS) mRNAs were quantified by northern blot analysis using [32P]labeled cDNA probes. By HPLC, PGE2 was the major prostanoid produced under basal or stimulated conditions. No release of thromboxane or 6-keto-PGF1 alpha into the medium was detected. PGE2 production was stimulated approximately 7- to 14-fold by IL-1 (1 ng/ml) and 3- to 8-fold by TGF-alpha (30 ng/ml) after 24 h. In combination, however, IL-1 and TGF-alpha caused a synergistic 37- to 71-fold increase in PGE2 accumulation. PGHS-1 mRNA levels were maximally increased approximately 2- to 3-fold by IL-1 and 1.5 to 2.5-fold by TGF-alpha after 24 h; the combination of IL-1 and TGF-alpha produced only an additive 3- to 6-fold increase. Western blotting revealed a corresponding 3-fold increase in immunoreactive PGHS-1 protein in response to combined IL-1 and TGF-alpha. PGHS-2 mRNA was increased 1.4-fold by TGF-alpha at 1 h, and the combination of IL-1 and TGF-alpha caused a 1.7-fold increase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Harrison
- Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Webb AR, Pilbeam C, Hanafin N, Holick MF. An evaluation of the relative contributions of exposure to sunlight and of diet to the circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in an elderly nursing home population in Boston. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 51:1075-81. [PMID: 2349922 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/51.6.1075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 215] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the vitamin D status of a Caucasian elderly population in a long-term-care facility in Boston. Comparison was made with a group of free-living elderly people. The sunlight exposure of residents was monitored and its effect on the serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] was compared with contributions from diet and multivitamins. Seasonal changes in serum 25(OH)D concentrations caused by sunlight exposure were greatest in the free-living subjects and declined in magnitude as the mobility of the volunteers decreased. Diet failed to provide an adequate amount of vitamin D for volunteers who had minimal outdoor activity. Use of a multivitamin supplement containing 10 micrograms (400 IU) vitamin D maintained serum 25(OH)D concentrations greater than 37.5 nmol/L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Webb
- Vitamin D, Skin and Bone Research Laboratory, Boston University School of Medicine, MA 02118
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|