The DCM Project Portal: A direct-to-participant platform of The DCM Research Project

Study objective

To develop a digital platform to conduct family-based, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) genetic research.

Design

The DCM Project Portal, a direct-to-participant electronic recruitment, consent, and communication tool, was designed using prior experience with traditional enrollment methods and characteristics and feedback of current participants.

Participants

DCM patients (probands) and their family members enrolled from June 7, 2016 to March 15, 2020 at 25 US advanced heart failure programs.

Results

The portal was designed as a self-guided, three module (registration, eligibility, and consent) process with supporting informational and messaging resources integrated throughout. The experience is tailored to user type and the format adaptable with programmatic growth. Characteristics of participants of the recently completed DCM Precision Medicine Study were assessed as an exemplary user population. A majority of the diverse (34 % non-Hispanic Black (NHE-B), 9.1 % Hispanic; 53.6 % female) proband (n = 1223) and family member (n = 1781) participants aged ≥18 years reported not at all or rarely having problems learning about their health from written information (81 %) and a high confidence in completing medical forms (77.2 % very much or often confident), supporting a self-guided model. A majority of participants across age and race-ethnicity groups reported internet access, with highest rates of no reported access in those ≥77 years (31.9 %), NHE-B (25.2 %), and Hispanic (22.9 %), a similar pattern to those reported by the US Census Bureau as of 2021.

Conclusions

The portal is an example of a digital approach to family-based genetic research that offers opportunity to improve access and efficiency of research operations.

The DCM Project Portal: A direct-to-participant platform of The DCM Research Project

Study Objective

To develop a digital platform to conduct family-based, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) genetic research.

Design

Innovative approaches are needed to achieve large family enrollment targets. The DCM Project Portal, a direct-to-participant electronic recruitment, consent, and communication tool, was designed using prior experience with traditional enrollment methods, characteristics and feedback of current participants, and internet access of the US population.

Participants

DCM patients (probands) and their family members.

Results

The portal was designed as a self-guided, three module (registration, eligibility, and consent) process with internally created supporting informational and messaging resources integrated throughout. The experience can be tailored to user type and the format adapted with programmatic growth. Characteristics of participants of the recently completed DCM Precision Medicine Study were assessed as an exemplary user population. A majority of the diverse (34% non-Hispanic Black (NHE-B), 9.1% Hispanic; 53.6% female) proband (n=1223) and family members (n=1781) participants aged ≥18 years reported not at all or rarely having problems learning about their health from written information (81%) and a high confidence in completing medical forms (77.2% very much or often confident). A majority of participants across age and race-ethnicity groups reported internet access, with highest rates of no reported access in those ≥77 years, NHE-B, and Hispanic, which reflects patterns similar to rates reported by the US Census Bureau as of 2021.

Conclusions

Digital enrollment tools offer opportunity to improve access and efficiency. The portal is an example of a digital approach to family-based genetic research.

Variant Interpretation for Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Refinement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/ClinGen Guidelines for the DCM Precision Medicine Study

BACKGROUND

The hypothesis of the Dilated Cardiomyopathy Precision Medicine Study is that most dilated cardiomyopathy has a genetic basis. The study returns results to probands and, when indicated, to relatives. While both the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology and ClinGen's MYH7-cardiomyopathy specifications provide relevant guidance for variant interpretation, further gene- and disease-specific considerations were required for dilated cardiomyopathy. To this end, we tailored the ClinGen MYH7-cardiomyopathy variant interpretation framework; the specifications implemented for the study are presented here.

METHODS

Modifications were created and approved by an external Variant Adjudication Oversight Committee. After a pilot using 81 probands, further adjustments were made, resulting in 27 criteria (9 modifications of the ClinGen MYH7 framework and reintroduction of 2 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathology criteria that were deemed not applicable by the ClinGen MYH7 working group).

RESULTS

These criteria were applied to 2059 variants in a test set of 97 probands. Variants were classified as benign (n=1702), likely benign (n=33), uncertain significance (n=71), likely pathogenic (likely pathogenic; n=12), and pathogenic (P; n=3). Only 2/15 likely pathogenic/P variants were identified in Non-Hispanic African ancestry probands.

CONCLUSIONS

We tailored the ClinGen MYH7 criteria for our study. Our preliminary data show that 15/97 (15.5%) probands have likely pathogenic/P variants, most of which were identified in probands of Non-Hispanic European ancestry. We anticipate continued evolution of our approach, one that will be informed by new insights on variant interpretation and a greater understanding of the genetic architecture of dilated cardiomyopathy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03037632.

Evaluation of the Genetic Systems Corp. Integra HIV-1 Pageblot system

The Genetic Systems Corp. Integra HIV-1 Pageblot system was evaluated as a supplementary assay to confirm the presence of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in 57 specimens from individuals at high risk of infection with the virus. Forty-one specimens identified as reactive in the Genetic Systems Integra HIV-1 Pageblot system were likewise identified as reactive in a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-licensed (Biotech/Dupont) Western blot (immunoblot). Six specimens identified as indeterminate in either or both immunoblot assays were all identified as nonreactive in a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-licensed enzyme immunoassay with recombinant antigens.

Evaluation of the Recombigen HIV-1 Latex Agglutination Test

The Recombigen HIV-1 Latex Agglutination (LA) Test was recently licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use as a rapid screening assay for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibodies. However, its performance in various settings and in different populations has not been firmly established. Consequently, we evaluated the test in the Cleveland Clinic Retrovirus Laboratory, a regional reference laboratory for HIV diagnostic testing and a testing laboratory for the Ohio Department of Health Anonymous HIV Testing and Counseling Program. Serum samples from 93 individuals presumed to be at high risk for HIV infection were evaluated. The sera were initially tested for HIV antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). All repeatedly reactive sera were subjected to confirmatory Western blot (WB; immunoblot) testing. Of 97 serum specimens tested (5 were from one seroconverter), 44 were repeatedly reactive by ELISA and 53 were nonreactive. Of the reactive serum specimens, 31 were confirmed positive and 12 were indeterminate by WB. All of the sera were coded and then retested by the LA test. Of 53 serum specimens nonreactive by ELISA, 51 were also nonreactive in the LA test. Of the 44 serum specimens reactive by ELISA, 16 were nonreactive by LA; however, 3 of the latter were WB positive. No serum specimen with an ELISA ratio (specimen optical density/cutoff optical density) of less than 2.1 scored reactive in the LA test. The LA test was positive for only two of five consecutive serum specimens from a seroconverter despite the fact that all but the earliest of these were ELISA reactive and WB positive. Although the LA test appears to be an adequate first-line screening test when appropriately used according to the directions of the manufacturer, our data suggest that occasional sera with low levels of reactivity by ELISA may not be readily detected as reactive by the LA test.