1
|
Reintam Blaser A, Alhazzani W, Belley-Cote E, Møller MH, Adhikari NKJ, Burry L, Coopersmith CM, Al Duhailib Z, Fujii T, Granholm A, Gunst J, Hammond N, Ke L, Lamontagne F, Loudet C, Morgan M, Ostermann M, Reinikainen M, Rosenfeld R, Spies C, Oczkowski S. Intravenous vitamin C therapy in adult patients with sepsis: A rapid practice guideline. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2023; 67:1423-1431. [PMID: 37500083 DOI: 10.1111/aas.14311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This Rapid Practice Guideline provides an evidence-based recommendation to address the question: in adults with sepsis or septic shock, should we recommend using or not using intravenous vitamin C therapy? METHODS The panel included 21 experts from 16 countries and used a strict policy for potential financial and intellectual conflicts of interest. Methodological support was provided by the Guidelines in Intensive Care, Development, and Evaluation (GUIDE) group. Based on an updated systematic review, and the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation approach, we evaluated the certainty of evidence and developed recommendations using the evidence-to-decision framework. We conducted an electronic vote, requiring >80% agreement among the panel for a recommendation to be adopted. RESULTS At longest follow-up, 90 days, intravenous vitamin C probably does not substantially impact (relative risk 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 1.17; absolute risk difference 1.8%, 95% CI -2.2 to 6.2; 6 trials, n = 2148, moderate certainty). Effects of vitamin C on mortality at earlier timepoints was of low or very low certainty due to risk of bias of the included studies and significant heterogeneity between study results. Few adverse events were reported with the use of vitamin C. The panel did not identify any major differences in other outcomes, including duration of mechanical ventilation, ventilator free days, hospital or intensive care unit length of stay, acute kidney injury, need for renal replacement therapy. Vitamin C may result in a slight reduction in duration of vasopressor support (MD -18.9 h, 95% CI -26.5 to -11.4; 21 trials, n = 2661, low certainty); but may not reduce sequential organ failure assessment scores (MD -0.69, 95% CI -1.55 to 0.71; 24 trials, n = 4002, low certainty). The panel judged the undesirable consequences of using IV vitamin C to probably outweigh the desirable consequences, and therefore issued a conditional recommendation against using IV vitamin C therapy in sepsis. CONCLUSIONS The panel suggests against use of intravenous vitamin C in adult patients with sepsis, beyond that of standard nutritional supplementation. Small and single center trials on this topic should be discouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Reintam Blaser
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Critical Care, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Research Institute of St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
- GUIDE Group, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Emilie Belley-Cote
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- GUIDE Group, Hamilton, Canada
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Morten Hylander Møller
- GUIDE Group, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Intensive Care, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Neill K J Adhikari
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa Burry
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto and Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Craig M Coopersmith
- Department of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Georgia
| | - Zainab Al Duhailib
- GUIDE Group, Hamilton, Canada
- Critical Care Medicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tomoko Fujii
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Anders Granholm
- GUIDE Group, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Intensive Care, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jan Gunst
- Laboratory of Intensive-Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Naomi Hammond
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Newtown, Australia
- Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Lu Ke
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
- National Institute of Healthcare Data Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | | | - Cecilia Loudet
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos General San Martín de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Department of Internal Medicine, Applied Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University of La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
| | - Matt Morgan
- Intensive Care Medicine Consultant, The Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Marlies Ostermann
- Department of Critical Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Matti Reinikainen
- University of Eastern Finland and Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ricardo Rosenfeld
- Nutrition Support Team, Casa de Saude Sao Jose-Rede Santa Catarina, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Claudia Spies
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus-Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Oczkowski
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- GUIDE Group, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roberti J, Jorro F, Rodríguez V, Belizán M, Arias P, Ratto ME, Reina R, Ini N, Loudet C, García-Elorrio E. Theory-driven, rapid formative research on quality improvement intervention for critical care of patients with COVID-19 in Argentina. Glob Qual Nurs Res 2021; 8:23333936211015660. [PMID: 34026926 PMCID: PMC8120599 DOI: 10.1177/23333936211015660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The challenges of implementing interventions in healthcare settings have been more apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic. This pre-implementation evaluation used a rapid qualitative approach to explore barriers and facilitators to an intervention in intensive care units in Argentina, aimed to promote the use of personal protection equipment, provide emotional support for professionals, and achieve patient flow goals. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with health professionals of 15 public hospitals in Argentina. Normalization Process Theory was used to guide content analysis of the data. Participants identified potential barriers such as the incorporation of non-specialist staff, shortage of resources, lack of communication between groups and shifts. Potential facilitators were also identified: regular feedback and communication related to implementation, adequate training for new and non-specialist staff, and incentives (e.g., scholarships). The immediacy of the pandemic demanded rapid qualitative research, sharing actionable findings in real time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Roberti
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Public Health at National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CIESP - CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Facundo Jorro
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Viviana Rodríguez
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María Belizán
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Pilar Arias
- Argentine Society of Intensive Care (SATI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Rosa Reina
- Argentine Society of Intensive Care (SATI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Natalí Ini
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Public Health at National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CIESP - CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Cecilia Loudet
- Argentine Society of Intensive Care (SATI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dubin A, Loudet C, Kanoore Edul VS, Osatnik J, Ríos F, Vásquez D, Pozo M, Lattanzio B, Pálizas F, Klein F, Piezny D, Rubatto Birri PN, Tuhay G, García A, Santamaría A, Zakalik G, González C, Estenssoro E. Characteristics of resuscitation, and association between use of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness and outcomes in septic patients: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in Argentina. Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10:40. [PMID: 32297028 PMCID: PMC7158970 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00659-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resuscitation of septic patients regarding goals, monitoring aspects and therapy is highly variable. Our aim was to characterize cardiovascular and fluid management of sepsis in Argentina, a low and middle-income country (LMIC). Furthermore, we sought to test whether the utilization of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness, as a guide for fluid therapy after initial resuscitation in patients with persistent or recurrent hypoperfusion, was associated with decreased mortality. METHODS Secondary analysis of a national, multicenter prospective cohort study (n = 787) fulfilling Sepsis-3 definitions. Epidemiological characteristics, hemodynamic management data, type of fluids and vasopressors administered, physiological variables denoting hypoperfusion, use of tests of fluid responsiveness, and outcomes, were registered. Independent predictors of mortality were identified with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Initially, 584 of 787 patients (74%) had mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mm Hg and/or signs of hypoperfusion and received 30 mL/kg of fluids, mostly normal saline (53%) and Ringer lactate (35%). Vasopressors and/or inotropes were administered in 514 (65%) patients, mainly norepinephrine (100%) and dobutamine (9%); in 22%, vasopressors were administered before ending the fluid load. After this, 413 patients (53%) presented persisting or recurrent hypotension and/or hypoperfusion, which prompted administration of additional fluid, based on: lactate levels (66%), urine output (62%), heart rate (54%), central venous O2 saturation (39%), central venous-arterial PCO2 difference (38%), MAP (31%), dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness (30%), capillary-refill time (28%), mottling (26%), central venous pressure (24%), cardiac index (13%) and/or pulmonary wedge pressure (3%). Independent predictors of mortality were SOFA and Charlson scores, lactate, requirement of mechanical ventilation, and utilization of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective observational study assessing the characteristics of resuscitation of septic patients in Argentina, a LMIC, the prevalent use of initial fluid bolus with normal saline and Ringer lactate and the use of norepinephrine as the most frequent vasopressor, reflect current worldwide practices. After initial resuscitation with 30 mL/kg of fluids and vasopressors, 413 patients developed persistent or recurrent hypoperfusion, which required further volume expansion. In this setting, the assessment of fluid responsiveness with dynamic tests to guide fluid resuscitation was independently associated with decreased mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaldo Dubin
- Servicio de Terapia Intensiva, Sanatorio Otamendi, Azcuénaga 870, C1115 AAB, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Cecilia Loudet
- Hospital Interzonal de Agudos San Martin de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Fernando Ríos
- Hospital Alejandro Posadas, El Palomar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Mario Pozo
- Clínica Bazterrica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Francisco Klein
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Damián Piezny
- Hospital Alejandro Posadas, El Palomar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Paolo N Rubatto Birri
- Servicio de Terapia Intensiva, Sanatorio Otamendi, Azcuénaga 870, C1115 AAB, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Graciela Tuhay
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | | | - Elisa Estenssoro
- Hospital Interzonal de Agudos San Martin de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are controversies about the amount of calories and the type of nutritional support that should be given to critically-ill people. Several authors advocate the potential benefits of hypocaloric nutrition support, but the evidence is inconclusive. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of prescribed hypocaloric nutrition support in comparison with standard nutrition support for critically-ill adults SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS (from inception to 20 June 2017) with a specific strategy for each database. We also assessed three websites, conference proceedings and reference lists, and contacted leaders in the field and the pharmaceutical industry for undetected/unpublished studies. There was no restriction by date, language or publication status. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing hypocaloric nutrition support to normo- or hypercaloric nutrition support or no nutrition support (e.g. fasting) in adults hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We meta-analysed data for comparisons in which clinical heterogeneity was low. We conducted prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and post hoc analyses, including meta-regression. Our primary outcomes were: mortality (death occurred during the ICU and hospital stay, or 28- to 30-day all-cause mortality); length of stay (days stayed in the ICU and in the hospital); and Infectious complications. Secondary outcomes included: length of mechanical ventilation. We assessed the quality of evidence with GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We identified 15 trials, with a total of 3129 ICU participants from university-associated hospitals in the USA, Colombia, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Greece, Germany and Iran. There are two ongoing studies. Participants suffered from medical and surgical conditions, with a variety of inclusion criteria. Four studies used parenteral nutrition and nine studies used only enteral nutrition; it was unclear whether the remaining two used parenteral nutrition. Most of them could not achieve the proposed caloric targets, resulting in small differences in the administered calories between intervention and control groups. Most studies were funded by the US government or non-governmental associations, but three studies received funding from industry. Five studies did not specify their funding sources.The included studies suffered from important clinical and statistical heterogeneity. This heterogeneity did not allow us to report pooled estimates of the primary and secondary outcomes, so we have described them narratively.When comparing hypocaloric nutrition support with a control nutrition support, for hospital mortality (9 studies, 1775 participants), the risk ratios ranged from 0.23 to 5.54; for ICU mortality (4 studies, 1291 participants) the risk ratios ranged from 0.81 to 5.54, and for mortality at 30 days (7 studies, 2611 participants) the risk ratios ranged from 0.79 to 3.00. Most of these estimates included the null value. The quality of the evidence was very low due to unclear or high risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision.Participants who received hypocaloric nutrition support compared to control nutrition support had a range of mean hospital lengths of stay of 15.70 days lower to 10.70 days higher (10 studies, 1677 participants), a range of mean ICU lengths of stay 11.00 days lower to 5.40 days higher (11 studies, 2942 participants) and a range of mean lengths of mechanical ventilation of 13.20 days lower to 8.36 days higher (12 studies, 3000 participants). The quality of the evidence for this outcome was very low due to unclear or high risk of bias in most studies, inconsistency and imprecision.The risk ratios for infectious complications (10 studies, 2804 participants) of each individual study ranged from 0.54 to 2.54. The quality of the evidence for this outcome was very low due to unclear or high risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecisionWe were not able to explain the causes of the observed heterogeneity using subgroup and sensitivity analyses or meta-regression. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The included studies had substantial clinical heterogeneity. We found very low-quality evidence about the effects of prescribed hypocaloric nutrition support on mortality in hospital, in the ICU and at 30 days, as well as in length of hospital and ICU stay, infectious complications and the length of mechanical ventilation. For these outcomes there is uncertainty about the effects of prescribed hypocaloric nutrition, since the range of estimates includes both appreciable benefits and harms.Given these limitations, results must be interpreted with caution in the clinical field, considering the unclear balance of the risks and harms of this intervention. Future research addressing the clinical heterogeneity of participants and interventions, study limitations and sample size could clarify the effects of this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario I Perman
- Instituto Universitario Hospital ItalianoArgentine Cochrane CentrePotosí 4234Buenos AiresCapital FederalArgentinaC1199ACL
| | - Agustín Ciapponi
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS‐CONICET)Argentine Cochrane CentreDr. Emilio Ravignani 2024Buenos AiresCapital FederalArgentinaC1414CPV
| | - Juan VA Franco
- Instituto Universitario Hospital ItalianoArgentine Cochrane CentrePotosí 4234Buenos AiresCapital FederalArgentinaC1199ACL
| | - Cecilia Loudet
- Universidad Nacional de La PlataDepartment of Intensive CareBuenos AiresArgentina
- Universidad Nacional de La PlataDepartment of Applied PharmacologyBuenos AiresArgentina
| | - Adriana Crivelli
- Hospital HIGA San MartínUnit of Nutrition Support and Malabsorptive Diseases64 Nº 1417 1/2 Dep. 2La PlataPcia. de Buenos AiresArgentina1900
| | - Virginia Garrote
- Instituto Universitario Hospital ItalianoBiblioteca CentralJ.D. Perón 4190Buenos AiresArgentinaC1199ABB
| | - Gastón Perman
- Instituto Universitario Hospital ItalianoArgentine Cochrane CentrePotosí 4234Buenos AiresCapital FederalArgentinaC1199ACL
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos AiresDepartment of MedicineCongreso 2346 18º ABuenos AiresArgentina1430
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vasquez DN, Neves AVD, Zakalik G, Intile D, Cicora F, Casanova M, Canales HS, Aphalo V, Loudet C, Sanchez A, Desmery P, Estenssoro E. OS024. Characteristics and outcomes of critically ill obstetric patientswith hypertensive disease of pregnancy in argentina: Multicenter study. Pregnancy Hypertens 2012; 2:188-9. [PMID: 26105238 DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2012.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Worldwide, hypertensive disease of pregnancy is one of the most frequent causes of admission of obstetric patients to the ICU. Maternal mortality risk related to Hypertension during pregnancy in Latin America is significantly higher than in developed countries. OBJECTIVES To describe the characteristics and outcomes of pregnant-postpartum patients with hypertensive disease of pregnancy admitted to ICU METHODS: DESIGN Multicenter case series study. POPULATION pregnant-postpartum (<42days) patients with hypertensive disease of pregnancy admitted to ICU. SETTING 3 ICUs in Argentina, 2 from the Public (P1) and 1 from the Private Health Sector (P2). STATISTICS Continuous data are presented as mean±SD or median [IQR], and categorical data as number (%). Comparisons among continuous data were performed with unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were analyzed by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test as appropriate. A two-sided α<0.05 was considered as significant. SPSS version 15 was used. RESULTS One hundred and eighty four patients were included, 161(87.5%) from P1. General characteristics are shown in the Table. Gestational age was 34±5 weeks. Risk factors for preeclampsia not included in Charlson score were chronic hypertension (22;12%), Obesity (6;3%) and preeclampsia in previous pregnancy (5;3%). ICU admission was postpartum in 80%(145). Causes of admission were eclampsia (63;34%), severe preeclampsia (61;33%), HELLP (33;18%), Eclampsia-HELLP (18;10%), Chronic Hypertension (5;3%) and Gestational Hypertension (4;2%). Predictive mortality according with APACHEII was 14%. Antenatal care was present in 115/142(81%) patients; 97/124(78%) in P1 vs 18/18 (100%) in P2; p0.024. Antenatal care was appropriate in 77/108(71.3%) of patients; 59/90(65.5%) in P1 vs 18/18(100%) in P2; p0.001. Maternal deaths (6) occurred in the Public sector and none of the patients had received antenatal care. Causes of mortality were hemorrhagic stroke (3) and multiple organ dysfunction (3) Table 1. CONCLUSION Most patients were from the public health sector and the majority did not have any comorbidity according with the Charlson score. Nevertheless, 18% presented risk factors for preeclampsia, not included in the mentioned score. Two-thirds of patients were admitted with eclampsia and severe preeclampsia. APACHEII overpredicted mortality. Half of deaths were related with hemorrhagic stroke, complication almost eradicated from developed countries. None of the patients who died had received antenatal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D N Vasquez
- Intensive Care Unit, HIGA Gral San Martin, La PLata, La Plata, Argentina; Intensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Anchorena, CABA, Argentina; Fundacion para la Investigacion y Asistencia de la Enfermedad Renal (FINAER), La Plata, Argentina
| | - A V Das Neves
- Intensive Care Unit, HIGA Gral San Martin, La PLata, La Plata, Argentina; Intensive Care Unit, Fundacion para la Investigacion y Asistencia de la Enfermedad Renal (FINAER), La Plata, Argentina
| | - G Zakalik
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Lagomaggiore, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - D Intile
- Intensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Anchorena, CABA, Argentina
| | - F Cicora
- Fundacion para la Investigacion y Asistencia de la Enfermedad Renal (FINAER), La Plata, Argentina
| | - M Casanova
- Intensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Anchorena, CABA, Argentina
| | - H S Canales
- Intensive Care Unit, HIGA Gral San Martin, La PLata, La Plata, Argentina
| | - V Aphalo
- Intensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Anchorena, CABA, Argentina
| | - C Loudet
- Intensive Care Unit, HIGA Gral San Martin, La PLata, La Plata, Argentina
| | - A Sanchez
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Lagomaggiore, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - P Desmery
- Intensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Anchorena, CABA, Argentina
| | - E Estenssoro
- Intensive Care Unit, HIGA Gral San Martin, La PLata, La Plata, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- Mario I Perman
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires; Department of Medicine; Estomba 2040 Buenos Aires Capital Federal Argentina 1430
| | - Agustín Ciapponi
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires; Family and Preventive Medicine Division; Independencia 1253 PB 'A' Buenos Aires Capital Federal Argentina 1099
| | - Adriana Crivelli
- Hospital HIGA San Martín; Unit of Nutrition Support and Malabsorptive Diseases; 64 Nº 1417 1/2 Dep. 2 La Plata Pcia. de Buenos Aires Argentina 1900
| | - Virginia Garrote
- Department of Education and Research, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires; Central Library; Gascón 450 Buenos Aires Argentina C1181ACH
| | - Cecilia Loudet
- Hospital HIGA San Martín; Intensive Care Medicine; 117, Nº 1467 La Plata Provincia Buenos Aires Argentina 1900
| | - Gastón Perman
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires; Department of Medicine; Estomba 2040 Buenos Aires Capital Federal Argentina 1430
| |
Collapse
|