1
|
Emons G, Steiner E, Vordermark D, Uleer C, Bock N, Paradies K, Ortmann O, Aretz S, Mallmann P, Kurzeder C, Hagen V, van Oorschot B, Höcht S, Feyer P, Egerer G, Friedrich M, Cremer W, Prott FJ, Horn LC, Prömpeler H, Langrehr J, Leinung S, Beckmann MW, Kimmig R, Letsch A, Reinhardt M, Alt-Epping B, Kiesel L, Menke J, Gebhardt M, Steinke-Lange V, Rahner N, Lichtenegger W, Zeimet A, Hanf V, Weis J, Mueller M, Henscher U, Schmutzler RK, Meindl A, Hilpert F, Panke JE, Strnad V, Niehues C, Dauelsberg T, Niehoff P, Mayr D, Grab D, Kreißl M, Witteler R, Schorsch A, Mustea A, Petru E, Hübner J, Rose AD, Wight E, Tholen R, Bauerschmitz GJ, Fleisch M, Juhasz-Boess I, Lax S, Runnebaum I, Tempfer C, Nothacker MJ, Blödt S, Follmann M, Langer T, Raatz H, Wesselmann S, Erdogan S. Interdisciplinary Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Patients with Endometrial Cancer. Guideline (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/034-OL, April 2018) - Part 2 with Recommendations on the Therapy and Follow-up of Endometrial Cancer, Palliative Care, Psycho-oncological/Psychosocial Care/Rehabilitation/Patient Information and Healthcare Facilities. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:1089-1109. [PMID: 30581199 PMCID: PMC6261739 DOI: 10.1055/a-0715-2964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Summary The first German interdisciplinary S3-guideline on the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer was published in April 2018. Funded by German Cancer Aid as part of an Oncology Guidelines Program, the lead coordinators of the guideline were the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG). Purpose Using evidence-based, risk-adapted therapy to treat low-risk women with endometrial cancer avoids unnecessarily radical surgery and non-useful adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. This can significantly reduce therapy-induced morbidity and improve the patient's quality of life as well as avoiding unnecessary costs. For women with endometrial cancer and a high risk of recurrence, the guideline defines the optimal extent of surgical radicality together with the appropriate chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiotherapy if required. An evidence-based optimal use of different therapeutic modalities should improve the survival rates and quality of life of these patients. This S3-guideline on endometrial cancer is intended as a basis for certified gynecological cancer centers. The aim is that the quality indicators established in this guideline will be incorporated in the certification processes of these centers. Methods The guideline was compiled in accordance with the requirements for S3-level guidelines. This includes, in the first instance, the adaptation of source guidelines selected using the DELBI instrument for appraising guidelines. Other consulted sources included reviews of evidence, which were compiled from literature selected during systematic searches of literature databases using the PICO scheme. In addition, an external biostatistics institute was commissioned to carry out a systematic search and assessment of the literature for one part of the guideline. Identified materials were used by the interdisciplinary working groups to develop suggestions for Recommendations and Statements, which were then subsequently modified during structured consensus conferences and/or additionally amended online using the DELPHI method, with consent between members achieved online. The guideline report is freely available online. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the therapy of endometrial cancer including precancers and early endometrial cancer as well as recommendations on palliative medicine, psycho-oncology, rehabilitation, patient information and healthcare facilities to treat endometrial cancer. The management of precancers of early endometrial precancerous conditions including fertility-preserving strategies is presented. The concept used for surgical primary therapy of endometrial cancer is described. Radiotherapy and adjuvant medical therapy to treat endometrial cancer and uterine carcinosarcomas are described. Recommendations are given for the follow-up care of endometrial cancer, recurrence and metastasis. Palliative medicine, psycho-oncology including psychosocial care, and patient information and rehabilitation are presented. Finally, the care algorithm and quality assurance steps for the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Günter Emons
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Eric Steiner
- Frauenklinik, GPR Klinikum Rüsselsheim am Main, Rüsselsheim, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Radiotherapy, Universität Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Christoph Uleer
- Facharzt für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Nina Bock
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz Onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Aretz
- Institut für Humangenetik, Universität Bonn, Zentrum für erbliche Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Volker Hagen
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, St.-Johannes-Hospital Dortmund, Germany
| | - Birgitt van Oorschot
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Höcht
- Xcare, Praxis für Strahlentherapie, Saarlouis, Germany
| | - Petra Feyer
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gerlinde Egerer
- Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Heinrich Prömpeler
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jan Langrehr
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Gefäß- und Viszeralchirurgie, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Rainer Kimmig
- Women's Department, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Anne Letsch
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie und Onkologie, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Reinhardt
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Alt-Epping
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Jan Menke
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marion Gebhardt
- Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs e. V., Erlangen, Erlangen/Forchheim, Germany
| | - Verena Steinke-Lange
- MGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, München und Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Nils Rahner
- Institut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Werner Lichtenegger
- Frauenklinik Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alain Zeimet
- Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik Nathanstift - Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Stiftungsprofessur Selbsthilfeforschung, Tumorzentrum/CCC Freiburg, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Mueller
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Frauenklinik am Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Mammazentrum, Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Joan Elisabeth Panke
- Medizinischer Dienst des Spitzenverbandes Bund der Krankenkassen e. V., Essen, Germany
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Strahlenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Timm Dauelsberg
- Winkelwaldklinik Nordrach, Fachklinik für onkologische Rehabilitation, Nordrach, Germany
| | - Peter Niehoff
- Strahlenklinik, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Doris Mayr
- Pathologisches Institut, LMU München, München, Germany
| | - Dieter Grab
- Frauenklinik Klinikum Harlaching, München, Germany
| | - Michael Kreißl
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Witteler
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | | | | | - Edgar Petru
- Frauenheilkunde, Med. Univ. Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jutta Hübner
- Klinikum für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Edward Wight
- Frauenklinik des Universitätsspitals Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie, Referat Bildung und Wissenschaft, Köln, Germany
| | - Gerd J Bauerschmitz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Markus Fleisch
- Landesfrauenklinik, HELIOS Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Ingolf Juhasz-Boess
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Sigurd Lax
- Institut für Pathologie, Landeskrankenhaus Graz West, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Clemens Tempfer
- Marien Hospital Herne - Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Langer
- Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heike Raatz
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie & Biostatistik (CEB), Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Saskia Erdogan
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Emons G, Steiner E, Vordermark D, Uleer C, Bock N, Paradies K, Ortmann O, Aretz S, Mallmann P, Kurzeder C, Hagen V, van Oorschot B, Höcht S, Feyer P, Egerer G, Friedrich M, Cremer W, Prott FJ, Horn LC, Prömpeler H, Langrehr J, Leinung S, Beckmann MW, Kimmig R, Letsch A, Reinhardt M, Alt-Epping B, Kiesel L, Menke J, Gebhardt M, Steinke-Lange V, Rahner N, Lichtenegger W, Zeimet A, Hanf V, Weis J, Mueller M, Henscher U, Schmutzler RK, Meindl A, Hilpert F, Panke JE, Strnad V, Niehues C, Dauelsberg T, Niehoff P, Mayr D, Grab D, Kreißl M, Witteler R, Schorsch A, Mustea A, Petru E, Hübner J, Rose AD, Wight E, Tholen R, Bauerschmitz GJ, Fleisch M, Juhasz-Boess I, Sigurd L, Runnebaum I, Tempfer C, Nothacker MJ, Blödt S, Follmann M, Langer T, Raatz H, Wesselmann S, Erdogan S. Interdisciplinary Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Patients with Endometrial Cancer. Guideline (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Nummer 032/034-OL, April 2018) - Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis and Hereditary Factors of Endometrial Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:949-971. [PMID: 30364388 PMCID: PMC6195426 DOI: 10.1055/a-0713-1218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Summary
The first German interdisciplinary S3-guideline on the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer was published in April 2018. Funded by German Cancer Aid as part of an Oncology Guidelines Program, the lead coordinators of the guideline were the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG).
Purpose
The use of evidence-based, risk-adapted therapy to treat low-risk women with endometrial cancer avoids unnecessarily radical surgery and non-useful adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. This can significantly reduce therapy-induced morbidity and improve the patientʼs quality of life as well as avoiding unnecessary costs. For women with endometrial cancer and a high risk of recurrence, the guideline defines the optimal surgical radicality together with the appropriate chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiotherapy where required. The evidence-based optimal use of different therapeutic modalities should improve survival rates and the quality of life of these patients. The S3-guideline on endometrial cancer is intended as a basis for certified gynecological cancer centers. The aim is that the quality indicators established in this guideline will be incorporated in the certification processes of these centers.
Methods
The guideline was compiled in accordance with the requirements for S3-level guidelines. This includes, in the first instance, the adaptation of source guidelines selected using the DELBI instrument for appraising guidelines. Other consulted sources include reviews of evidence which were compiled from literature selected during systematic searches of literature databases using the PICO scheme. In addition, an external biostatistics institute was commissioned to carry out a systematic search and assessment of the literature for one area of the guideline. The identified materials were used by the interdisciplinary working groups to develop suggestions for Recommendations and Statements, which were then modified during structured consensus conferences and/or additionally amended online using the DELPHI method with consent being reached online. The guideline report is freely available online.
Recommendations
Part 1 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations on epidemiology, screening, diagnosis and hereditary factors, The epidemiology of endometrial cancer and the risk factors for developing endomentrial cancer are presented. The options for screening and the methods used to diagnose endometrial cancer including the pathology of the cancer are outlined. Recommendations are given for the prevention, diagnosis, and therapy of hereditary forms of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Günter Emons
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Eric Steiner
- Frauenklinik, GPR Klinikum Rüsselsheim am Main, Rüsselsheim, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Uleer
- Facharzt für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Germany
| | - Nina Bock
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz Onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Aretz
- Institut für Humangenetik, Universität Bonn, Zentrum für erbliche Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Volker Hagen
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, St.-Johannes-Hospital Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Birgitt van Oorschot
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum Palliativmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Höcht
- Xcare, Praxis für Strahlentherapie, Saarlouis, Saarlouis, Germany
| | - Petra Feyer
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gerlinde Egerer
- Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Heinrich Prömpeler
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jan Langrehr
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Gefäß- und Viszeralchirurgie, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Rainer Kimmig
- Women's Department, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Anne Letsch
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie und Onkologie, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Reinhardt
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Pius Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Alt-Epping
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, University of Muenster, Germany, Münster, Germany
| | - Jan Menke
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marion Gebhardt
- Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs e. V., Erlangen, Erlangen/Forchheim, Germany
| | - Verena Steinke-Lange
- MGZ - Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, München und Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Nils Rahner
- Institut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Werner Lichtenegger
- Frauenklinik Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alain Zeimet
- Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik Nathanstift - Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Stiftungsprofessur Selbsthilfeforschung, Tumorzentrum/CCC Freiburg, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Mueller
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Frauenklinik am Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Mammazentrum, Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Joan Elisabeth Panke
- Medizinischer Dienst des Spitzenverbandes Bund der Krankenkassen e. V., Essen, Germany
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Strahlenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC ER-EMN, Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Timm Dauelsberg
- Winkelwaldklinik Nordrach, Fachklinik für onkologische Rehabilitation, Nordrach, Germany
| | - Peter Niehoff
- Strahlenklinik, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Doris Mayr
- Pathologisches Institut, LMU München, München, Germany
| | - Dieter Grab
- Frauenklinik Klinikum Harlaching, München, Germany
| | - Michael Kreißl
- Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Witteler
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, University of Muenster, Germany, Münster, Germany
| | | | | | - Edgar Petru
- Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Jutta Hübner
- Klinikum für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Edward Wight
- Frauenklinik des Universitätsspitals Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie, Referat Bildung und Wissenschaft, Köln, Germany
| | - Gerd J Bauerschmitz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Markus Fleisch
- Landesfrauenklinik, HELIOS Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Ingolf Juhasz-Boess
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - Lax Sigurd
- Institut für Pathologie, Landeskrankenhaus Graz West, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Clemens Tempfer
- Marien Hospital Herne - Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | | | | | - Markus Follmann
- Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Office des Leitlinienprogramms Onkologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Langer
- Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Office des Leitlinienprogramms Onkologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Heike Raatz
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie & Biostatistik (CEB), Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Saskia Erdogan
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Faller H, Strahl A, Richard M, Niehues C, Meng K. Symptoms of depression and anxiety as predictors of physical functioning in breast cancer patients. A prospective study using path analysis. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:1677-1681. [PMID: 28595474 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1333630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although symptoms of depression and anxiety are linked to health-related quality of life (HRQoL), the nature of this relationship remained unclear. We therefore aimed to examine, in a prospective study, both possible directions of impact in this relationship. To avoid conceptual and measurement overlap between depressive and anxiety symptoms, on the one hand, and HRQoL, on the other hand, we focused on the physical functioning component of HRQoL. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study with 436 female breast cancer patients (mean age 51 years). Both at baseline and after 12 months, we measured symptoms of depression and anxiety with the four-item Patient Heath Questionnaire (PHQ-4) and physical functioning with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Using path analysis, we estimated (1) the predictive value of symptoms of depression/anxiety for subsequent physical functioning and (2) the predictive value of physical functioning for subsequent symptoms of depression/anxiety, in the same model. RESULTS Baseline symptoms of depression/anxiety predicted 1-year levels of physical functioning (depression: standardized β = -.09, p = .024; anxiety: standardized β = -.10, p = .009), while the reciprocal paths linking baseline physical functioning to subsequent depressive and anxiety symptoms were not significant, adjusting for the baseline scores of all outcome variables. CONCLUSIONS Depressive and anxiety symptoms were predictors of the physical functioning component of HRQoL. Thus, if this relation is causal, treating breast cancer patients' depressive and anxiety symptoms may have a favorable impact on their self-reported physical functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Faller
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - André Strahl
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Richard
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Christiane Niehues
- Reha-Zentrum Ückeritz, Klinik Ostseeblick, Ückeritz, Germany
- Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Meng
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Widera T, Baumgarten E, Druckenmüller A, Niehues C. Kinder- und Jugendlichen-Rehabilitation – Stand und Perspektiven aus Sicht der Deutschen Rentenversicherung. REHABILITATION 2017; 56:91-102. [PMID: 28395372 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-103065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T. Widera
- Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Geschäftsbereich Sozialmedizin und Rehabilitation, Berlin
| | - E. Baumgarten
- Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Geschäftsbereich Sozialmedizin und Rehabilitation, Berlin
| | - A. Druckenmüller
- Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Geschäftsbereich Sozialmedizin und Rehabilitation, Berlin
| | - C. Niehues
- Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Geschäftsbereich Sozialmedizin und Rehabilitation, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lederle M, Kotzjan PS, Niehues C, Brüggemann S, Bitzer EM. [Medical Rehabilitation as an Attractive Field of Work for Medical Doctors? - A Qualitative Survey]. REHABILITATION 2017; 56:344-350. [PMID: 28359111 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-100013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
In the German Health system there is an increasing competition in the recruitment of specialised staff, especially for rehabilitation centres, which are deemed less attractive. Therefore, this study examines the attractiveness of the field of medical rehabilitation from the point of view of medical professionals. We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews with doctors from 7 rehabilitation centres with different medical specialisations. The interviews were digitized and transcribed. A structured content analysis was carried out using the software MAXQDA 11. 745 codes were identified and assigned to the categories "attractiveness", "unfavourable aspects" and "special features" of rehabilitation. Regarding medical rehabilitation, the interviewees appreciated especially the predictable, flexible working environment with little time pressure. Other than working with rehabilitative patients working as part of an interdisciplinary team was of high importance for the interviewees. Among the special features of rehabilitation in comparison with acute care were the higher relevance of the bio-psycho-social model of health and illness as well as the higher proportion of communication and organisation. Medical rehabilitation in Germany is an attractive field of work for medical doctors. This fact should be considered more with regards to rehabilitation's public image.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christiane Niehues
- Geschäftsbereich Sozialmedizin und Rehabilitation, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Berlin
| | - Silke Brüggemann
- Geschäftsbereich Sozialmedizin und Rehabilitation, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Berlin
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Faller H, Strahl A, Richard M, Niehues C, Meng K. The prospective relationship between satisfaction with information and symptoms of depression and anxiety in breast cancer: A structural equation modeling analysis. Psychooncology 2017; 26:1741-1748. [PMID: 28024096 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2016] [Revised: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous research has demonstrated associations between satisfaction with information and reduced emotional distress in cancer patients. However, as most studies were cross-sectional, the direction of this relationship remained unclear. We therefore aimed to test whether information satisfaction predicted subsequent depression and anxiety levels, and, reciprocally, depression and anxiety levels predicted subsequent information satisfaction, thus clarifying the direction of impact. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study with 436 female breast cancer patients (mean age 51 years). We measured information satisfaction with 2 self-developed items, symptoms of depression with the 2-item Patient Heath Questionnaire and symptoms of anxiety with the 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale. We created 2 structural equation models, 1 for depression and 1 for anxiety, that examined the prediction of 1-year depression (or anxiety) levels by baseline information satisfaction and, in the same model, 1-year information satisfaction by baseline depression (or anxiety) levels (cross-lagged panel analysis). RESULTS Baseline information satisfaction predicted 1-year levels of both depression (beta = -0.17, P < .01) and anxiety (beta = -0.13, P < .01), adjusting for the baseline scores of the outcome variables. Conversely, baseline levels of depression (beta = -0.12, P < .05) and anxiety (beta = -0.16, P < .01) predicted 1-year information satisfaction, adjusting for its baseline score. CONCLUSION Our results suggest a bidirectional relationship between information satisfaction and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Thus, provision of information may reduce subsequent depression and anxiety, while reducing depression and anxiety levels may increase satisfaction with received information. Combining the provision of information with emotional support may be particularly beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Faller
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - André Strahl
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Richard
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Christiane Niehues
- Reha-Zentrum Ückeritz, Klinik Ostseeblick, Ückeritz, Germany`.,Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Meng
- Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brandes I, Niehues C. [Rehabilitation goals in discharge reports and in patient questionnaires--on the example of endometriosis patients]. REHABILITATION 2013; 53:8-16. [PMID: 24217878 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1347228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND [corrected] The goal orientation of rehabilitation has increasingly found its way in research and practice. Though, shortcomings were ascertained for the implementation into the clinical routine furthermore. An empirical analysis of goal setting in clinical practice should complement the available evidence. METHODS The study is based on a cross-sectional survey of all endometriosis patients, who had been treated at a rehabilitation center in 2008 or 2009. Data stemmed from the uniform medical rehabilitation discharge reports, and a patient questionnaire, which was sent to the registered women by the clinic routinely before the beginning of the rehabilitation. Data about rehabilitation goals were available as free text information for both the discharge reports as well as the patient questionnaires. A category system oriented at the ICF system (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), was developed to structure the goals. RESULTS 293 patients had provided information concerning their rehabilitation goals, while 69 patients didn’t reply to the question of their rehabilitation goals. The latter were excluded to the analysis. In the discharge reports, altogether, more goals were documented than in the patient questionnaires (5.98 compared to 4.97 goals per patient). In 35% of the numbers of rehabilitation goals clear congruence was found between the data in the discharge reports and the patient questionnaires. CONCLUSION The results support the assumption that the included patients had difficulties in goal-setting. In addition it is obvious that the goals in the discharge reports had little relation to the goals framed by the patients, in language and content. A goal-setting process less oriented towards the medical and clinical needs but more towards the patients needs and expectation would be desirable particularly with regard to a more intensive patient orientation. The implementation of a prepared list of possible rehabilitation goals could serve for the shared goal-setting process in the context of anamnesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Brandes
- Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
| | - C Niehues
- Fachbereich für gynäkologische und onkologische Rehabilitation, Median Klinikum für Rehabilitation Bad Salzuflen, Kliniken am Burggraben
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Thomas A, Niehues C, Oppelt P, Haas D, Tammaa A, Salzer H. Diagnostic delay for endometriosis in Austria and Germany: causes and possible consequences. Hum Reprod 2012; 27:3412-6. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|
9
|
Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Thomas A, Niehues C, Oppelt P, Salzer H. Diagnoseverzögerung bei Endometriose – was sind die Ursachen? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2012. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
10
|
Niehues C. Rehabilitation und Sozialmedizin bei Patientinnen mit der Hauptdiagnose Endometriose (N80). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2011. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1280494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
11
|
Brandes I, Wunderlich B, Niehues C. [General conditions concerning the implementation of an outpatient education programme--characteristics and distinctions from an inpatient training programme]. REHABILITATION 2011; 50:111-7. [PMID: 21503864 DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1265184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the EVA study was to develop an outpatient education programme for women with endometriosis with a view to permanent transfer into routine care. Implementation of the programme generated several problems and obstacles that are not, or not to this extent, present in the inpatient setting of a rehabilitation clinic. METHODS The patient education programme was developed in line with an existing inpatient programme, taking into account the criteria for evaluating such training programmes. Several adjustments to process, structure and content level had to be made to achieve the conditions of the outpatient setting. RESULTS Since May 2008, 17 training courses took place in various outpatient and acute inpatient settings, and a total of 156 women with diagnosed endometriosis participated. The problems and obstacles that emerged affected similarly the process, structure and content of the training programme. DISCUSSION On the structural level, especially problems with availability of rooms, technical equipment and trainers occurred, leading to significant time pressures. The main problem on the procedural level was the recruitment of participants, since--in contrast to the inpatient setting and to disease management programmes--no assignment by physicians or insurers takes place. Furthermore, gainful activity of the participants and the resulting shift of the training beyond the usual working and opening hours are important barriers for implementation. The unavailability of trainers in these settings requires creative solutions. Regarding the contents of the training it has to be taken into consideration that--unlike the inpatient setting--no aftercare intervention and no individual psychological consultation are possible. The training programme has to be designed in such a way that all problems that have occurred could be dealt with appropriately. CONCLUSION In summary, the permanent implementation of an outpatient training programme is possible but is more time-consuming than inpatient trainings due to unfavourable conditions concerning recruitment, organization and procedure. It seems that "soft" factors such as motivation, integration into the clinic concept, well-defined acceptance of responsibility and experience in dealing with the disease and with patient groups are the critical success factors. Until now cost carriage by the health insurance funds has not been realized--except for disease management programmes; so there is still a need for action here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Brandes
- Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
von Wahlert G, Niehues C, Brandes I. Welche Effekte indikationsspezifischer stationärer gynäkologischer Rehabilitation sind bei Endometriose-Patientinnen nachweisbar? Ergebnisse einer Nachbefragung 2–3 Jahre nach Teilnahme. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2007. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-989192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
13
|
Niehues C, Brandes I. Lebensqualität und Krankheitsfolgen – aktuelle Daten der Rehabilitations-Patientinnen. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2007. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-989173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
14
|
Niehues C, Höldke B, Gericke CA. [Comparison of the legal basis for health prevention and promotion in the school laws of the federal states in Germany]. Gesundheitswesen 2006; 68:101-9. [PMID: 16482490 DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-859002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health prevention and promotion in schools are key public health tasks in most countries. This study focuses on the importance given to prevention and promotion of health in law texts through comparatively analysing school laws for the sixteen federal states in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS The basis for the analysis are the sixteen federal school laws in Germany. A conceptual framework to analyse the law texts has been developed grouped according to the following categories: aims of literacy and education; development of organization; individual and social health; and security and accident prevention. Examples for second level categories include nutrition, motility, alcohol, violence, and road-traffic accident prevention. Based on a point-system of valuation, a ranking for the federal states was derived in terms of an assessment of the importance of health prevention and promotion in federal states' school laws. RESULTS Berlin, Brandenburg and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern -- three "new" states (i. e. formerly East-German) are leading the ranking. Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg, two states that had been ruled by conservative governments for a long time, had special difficulties to take over new values in their legislation and occupied rank 14 in our ranking. The last place was taken by a state under social-democratic rule -- Nordrhein-Westfalen. However, this law dated from 1952 and a new law has just been passed in August 2005. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION The comparison of the school laws of the federal states in Germany demonstrates that there has been a substantial amount of change in recent years. In some school laws, the impulses of the Ottawa Charta regarding health prevention can be clearly recognised. In others prevention and promotion of health are only subordinated subjects. As in many other areas of social importance, reorientation is taking place. In particular, federal states who have placed little emphasis on school health will have to renew their corresponding legislation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Niehues
- Lehrstuhl Management im Gesundheitswesen, WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Systems Research and Management, Technische Universität Berlin
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Niehues C, Höldke B, Gericke C. Vergleich der Schulgesetze der Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Hinblick auf die Verankerung von Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung. Gesundheitswesen 2005. [DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-920553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|