Expedited loading with intravenous sotalol is safe and feasible-primary results of the Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol (PEAKS) Registry

BACKGROUND

Loading of oral sotalol for atrial fibrillation requires 3 days, frequently in the hospital, to achieve steady state. The Food and Drug Administration approved loading with intravenous (IV) sotalol through model-informed development, without patient data.

OBJECTIVE

We present results of the first multicenter evaluation of this recent labeling for IV sotalol.

METHODS

The Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol (PEAKS) Registry was a multicenter observational registry of patients undergoing elective IV sotalol load for atrial arrhythmias. Outcomes, measured from hospital admission until first outpatient follow-up, included adverse arrhythmia events, efficacy, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Of 167 consecutively enrolled patients, 23% were female; the median age was 68 (interquartile range, 61-74) years, and the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 (interquartile range, 2-4). Overall, 99% were admitted for sotalol initiation (1% for dose escalation), with a target oral sotalol dose of either 80 mg twice daily (85 [51%]) or 120 mg twice daily (78 [47%]); 62 patients (37%) had an estimated creatinine clearance ≤90 mL/min. On presentation, 40% of patients were in sinus rhythm, whereas 26% underwent cardioversion before sotalol infusion. In 2 patients, sotalol infusion was stopped for bradycardia or hypotension. In 6 patients, sotalol was discontinued before discharge because of QTc prolongation (3), bradycardia (1), or recurrent atrial arrhythmia (2). The mean length of stay was 1.1 days, and 95% (n = 159) were discharged within 1 night.

CONCLUSION

IV sotalol loading is safe and feasible for atrial arrhythmias, with low rates of adverse events, and yields shorter hospitalizations. More data are needed on the minimal duration required for monitoring in the hospital.

Major drivers of healthcare system costs and cost variability for routine atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) but incurs significant financial costs to payers. Reducing variability may improve cost effectiveness.

Objectives

We aimed to measure (1) the components of direct and indirect costs for routine AF ablation procedures, (2) the variability of those costs, and (3) the main factors driving ablation cost variability.

Methods

Using data from the University of Utah Health Value Driven Outcomes system, we were able to measure direct, inflation-adjusted costs of uncomplicated, routine AF ablation to the healthcare system. Direct costs were considered costs incurred by pharmacy, disposable supplies, patient labs, implants, and other services categories (primarily anesthesia support) and indirect costs were considered within imaging, facility, and electrophysiology lab management categories.

Results

A total of 910 patients with 1060 outpatient ablation encounters were included from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2020. Disposable supplies accounted for the largest component of cost with 44.8 ± 9.7%, followed by other services (primarily anesthesia support) with 30.4 ± 7.7% and facility costs with 16.1 ± 5.6%; pharmacy, imaging, and implant costs each contributed <5%. Direct costs were larger than indirect costs (82.4 ± 5.6% vs 17.6 ± 5.6%). Multivariable regression showed that procedure operator was the primary factor associated with AF ablation overall cost (up to 12% differences depending on operator).

Conclusions

Direct costs and other services (primarily anesthesia) drive the majority costs associated with AF ablations. There is significant variability in costs for these routine, uncomplicated AF ablation procedures. The procedure operator, and not patient characteristic, is the main driver for cost variability.

Increasing time between first diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and catheter ablation adversely affects long-term outcomes in patients with and without structural heart disease

INTRODUCTION

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia often comorbid with systolic or diastolic heart failure (HF). Catheter ablation is a more effective treatment for AF with concurrent left ventricular dysfunction, however, the optimal timing of use in these patients is unknown.

METHODS

All patients that received a catheter ablation for AF(n = 9979) with 1 year of follow-up within the Intermountain Healthcare system were included. Patients with were identified by the presence of structural disease by ejection fraction (EF): EF ≤ 35% (n = 1024) and EF > 35% (n = 8955). Recursive partitioning categories were used to separate patients into clinically meaningful strata based upon time from initial AF diagnosis until ablation: 30-180(n = 2689), 2:181-545(n = 1747), 3:546-1825(n = 2941), and 4:>1825(n = 2602) days.

RESULTS

The mean days from AF diagnosis to first ablation was 3.5 ± 3.8 years (EF > 35%: 3.5 ± 3.8 years, EF ≤ 35%: 3.4 ± 3.8 years, p = .66). In the EF > 35% group, delays in treatment (181-545 vs. 30-180, 546-1825 vs. 30-180, >1825 vs. 30-180 days) increased the risk of death with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.02(p < .0001), 2.62(p < .0001), and 4.39(p < .0001) respectively with significant risks for HF hospitalization (HR:1.44-3.69), stroke (HR:1.11-2.14), and AF recurrence (HR:1.42-1.81). In patients with an EF ≤ 35%, treatment delays also significantly increased risk of death (HR 2.07-3.77) with similar trends in HF hospitalization (HR:1.63-1.09) and AF recurrence (HR:0.79-1.24).

CONCLUSION

Delays in catheter ablation for AF resulted in increased all-cause mortality in all patients with differential impact observed on HF hospitalization, stroke, and AF recurrence risks by baseline EF. These data favor earlier use of ablation for AF in patients with and without structural heart disease.

Heart Failure, Atrioventricular Block, and Ventricular Tachycardia in Sarcoidosis

Background Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease usually affecting the lungs, although cardiac morbidity may be common. The risk of these outcomes and the characteristics that predict them remain largely unknown. This study investigates the epidemiology of heart failure, atrioventricular block, and ventricular tachycardia among patients with and without sarcoidosis. Methods and Results We identified California residents aged ≥21 years using the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development ambulatory surgery, emergency, or inpatient databases from 2005 to 2015. The risk of sarcoidosis on incident heart failure, atrioventricular block, and ventricular tachycardia were each determined. Linkage to the Social Security Death Index was used to ascertain overall mortality. Among 22 527 964 California residents, 19 762 patients with sarcoidosis (0.09%) were identified. Sarcoidosis was the strongest predictor of heart failure (hazard ratio [HR], 11.2; 95% CI, 10.7-11.7), atrioventricular block (HR, 117.7; 95% CI, 103.3-134.0), and ventricular tachycardia (HR, 26.1; 95% CI, 24.2-28.1) identified among all risk factors. The presence of any cardiac involvement best predicted each outcome. Approximately 22% (95% CI, 18%-26%) of the relationship between sarcoidosis and increased mortality was explained by the presence of at least 1 of these cardiovascular outcomes. Conclusions The magnitude of risk associated with sarcoidosis as a predictor of heart failure, atrioventricular block, and ventricular tachycardia, exceeds all established risk factors. Surveillance for and anticipation of these outcomes among patients with sarcoidosis is indicated, and consideration of a sarcoidosis diagnosis may be prudent among patients with heart failure, atrioventricular block, or ventricular tachycardia.

Childhood Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Adulthood

BACKGROUND

Cigarette smoking is known to increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), and a recent cross-sectional analysis suggested that parental smoking may be an AF risk factor.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess if parental smoking predicts offspring AF in the Framingham Heart Study.

METHODS

This study analyzed Framingham Offspring cohort participants with parents in the Original cohort with known smoking status during the offspring's childhood. Framingham participants were evaluated every 2 to 8 years and were under routine surveillance for incident AF. The authors assessed AF incidence among Offspring participants exposed to parental smoking through age 18 years and performed a mediation analysis to determine the extent to which offspring smoking might explain observed associations.

RESULTS

Of 2,816 Offspring cohort participants with at least 1 parent in the Original cohort, 82% were exposed to parental smoking. For every pack/day increase in parental smoking, there was an 18% increase in offspring AF incidence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.39; p = 0.04). Additionally, parental smoking was a risk factor for offspring smoking (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.54; p < 0.001). Offspring smoking mediated 17% (95% CI: 1.5% to 103.3%) of the relationship between parental smoking and offspring AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Childhood secondhand smoke exposure predicted increased risk for adulthood AF after adjustment for AF risk factors. Some of this relationship may be mediated by a greater propensity among offspring of smoking parents to smoke themselves. These findings highlight potential new pathways for AF risk that begin during childhood, offering new evidence to motivate smoking avoidance and cessation.

Use of an electrocardiographic screening tool to determine candidacy for a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

BACKGROUND

An electrocardiographic (ECG) screening test has been developed to identify patients being considered for a totally subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) at risk for T-wave oversensing.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of potential S-ICD recipients who fail the ECG screening test and to identify predictors of failure.

METHODS

Patients who already have an ICD but are not receiving antibradycardia pacing are representative of patients who might be considered for an S-ICD. One hundred such outpatients were enrolled in the study. Surface rhythm strips were recorded along the sensing vectors of the S-ICD system and the screening template applied. Clinical and standard ECG characteristics of patients who failed the test were compared to those who passed.

RESULTS

Patients had the following characteristics: 72% male, age 57 ± 16 years, body mass index 29 ± 6 kg/m(2), left ventricular ejection fraction 43% ± 17%, QRS duration 109 ± 23 ms, QTc interval 447 ± 39 ms, 44% had coronary disease, and 55% had heart failure. Among the 100 patients, 8% failed the screening test. There were no differences in patient clinical characteristics and most standard ECG measurements. However, patients with T-wave inversions in standard ECG leads I, II, and aVF had a 45% chance of failing.

CONCLUSION

Eight percent of potential S-ICD patients were not eligible for the S-ICD after failing the screening test designed to identify patients susceptible to T-wave oversensing. Patients with T-wave inversions in leads I, II, and aVF on a standard ECG were 23 times more likely to fail. More work is needed in S-ICD sensing algorithms to increase patient eligibility for the S-ICD.