Evidence-based practice and undergraduate nursing curriculum: Trends and perspectives

Evidence-based practice is recognized as key to improving the quality of health care, increasing patient safety, controlling costs, and improving outcomes for people with healthcare and nursing needs. Despite its advantages, the use of evidence in healthcare settings is not yet a standard of healthcare in the world. How can students learn and develop skills to use evidence-based-practice (EBP) in current nursing curriculum and how can researchers work with students and clinical professionals to increase EBP? Changes in nursing education will require close collaboration with clinical contexts because learning about evidence takes place outside the classroom.

AB1565-HPR REHABILITATION NURSES KNOWLEDGE ABOUT OSTEOPOROSIS AND FRAGILITY FRACTURES IN PORTUGAL

Background

Scientific evidence reveals gaps in health professionals’ knowledge about osteoporosis and fragility fractures, which impairs and influences the quality of care, namely in preventive actions.

Objectives

To analyse knowledge of Rehabilitation Nurses about osteoporosis and fragility fractures to identify training needs of Rehabilitation Nurses.

Methods

A cross-sectional study, integrated in a larger project, using an adapted questionnaire, made available online and disseminated by mailing list of “Ordem dos Enfermeiros” (Royal Colleague of Nursings) to all Portuguese Rehabilitation Nurses.

Results

There were include 452 participants(10.3% of the 4 397 Rehabilitation Nurses), 17% perform functions in orthopaedics and traumatology service, 4.5% physical medicine and rehabilitation and 78.6% in other services, majority, 74.6% women. On average, 69.6% correct answers were identified regarding osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Results reveal that the main areas of knowledge deficit, in this study, are related to the concept and epidemiology of osteoporosis and fragility fractures and about the most appropriate diet. Nurses with higher academic degree (master’s degree) revealed more knowledge (p=0.01).

Conclusion

This study reveals that the knowledge about osteoporosis and fragility fractures is low (<70% correct answers), thus there is an opportunity to improve the knowledge related to osteoporosis and fragility fractures among Specialist Nurses in Rehabilitation Nursing.

References

[1]Peng, L., Reynolds, N., He, A., Liu, M., Yang, J., She, P., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Osteoporosis knowledge and related factors among orthopedic nurses in Hunan province of China. International journal of orthopaedic and trauma nursing, 36, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2019.100714

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Conversational Agents for Health and Well-being Across the Life Course: Protocol for an Evidence Map

BACKGROUND

Conversational agents, which we defined as computer programs that are designed to simulate two-way human conversation by using language and are potentially supplemented with nonlanguage modalities, offer promising avenues for health interventions for different populations across the life course. There is a lack of open-access and user-friendly resources for identifying research trends and gaps and pinpointing expertise across international centers.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to provide an overview of all relevant evidence on conversational agents for health and well-being across the life course. Specifically, our objectives are to identify, categorize, and synthesize-through visual formats and a searchable database-primary studies and reviews in this research field.

METHODS

An evidence map was selected as the type of literature review to be conducted, as it optimally corresponded to our aim. We systematically searched 8 databases (MEDLINE; CINAHL; Web of Science; Scopus; the Cochrane, ACM, IEEE, and Joanna Briggs Institute databases; and Google Scholar). We will perform backward citation searching on all included studies. The first stage of a double-stage screening procedure, which was based on abstracts and titles only, was conducted by using predetermined eligibility criteria for primary studies and reviews. An operational screening procedure was developed for streamlined and consistent screening across the team. Double data extraction will be performed with previously piloted data collection forms. We will appraise systematic reviews by using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2. Primary studies and reviews will be assessed separately in the analysis. Data will be synthesized through descriptive statistics, bivariate statistics, and subgroup analysis (if appropriate) and through high-level maps such as scatter and bubble charts. The development of the searchable database will be informed by the research questions and data extraction forms.

RESULTS

As of April 2021, the literature search in the eight databases was concluded, yielding a total of 16,351 records. The first stage of screening, which was based on abstracts and titles only, resulted in the selection of 1282 records of primary studies and 151 records of reviews. These will be subjected to second-stage screening. A glossary with operational definitions for supporting the study selection and data extraction stages was drafted. The anticipated completion date is October 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

Our wider definition of a conversational agent and the broad scope of our evidence map will explicate trends and gaps in this field of research. Additionally, our evidence map and searchable database of studies will help researchers to avoid fragmented research efforts and wasteful redundancies. Finally, as part of the Harnessing the Power of Conversational e-Coaches for Health and Well-being Through Swiss-Portuguese Collaboration project, our work will also inform the development of an international taxonomy on conversational agents for health and well-being, thereby contributing to terminology standardization and categorization.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/26680.