Using Theories of Action to Guide National Program Evaluation and Local Strategy in the Community Care Network Demonstration

Evaluations of multisite community-based projects are notoriously difficult to conceptualize and conduct. Projects may share an overarching vision but operate in varying contexts and pursue different initiatives. One tool that can assist evaluators facing these challenges is to developa “theory of action” (TOA) that identifies critical assumptions regarding how a program expects to achieve its goals. Community Care Network (CCN) evaluators used the TOA to refine research questions, define key variables, relate questions to each other, and identify when we might realistically expect to observe answers. In this article, the authors present their national-level CCN TOA. They also worked with sites to helpthem “surface” their local TOA; the article analyzes the results to determine the content, clarity, extent of evidence base, and strategic orientation of theories articulated by different sites.

A systematic review of the literature on weight in sexual minority women

BACKGROUND

Over the past 20 years, a growing literature has demonstrated that sexual minority women have greater weight than heterosexual women, prompting concern that they may be at high risk for disparities in physical disorders. In 2008, Bowen et al. published a review of the existing research on sexual minority women and obesity, finding no methodologically strong studies with representative sampling procedures.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic review of the literature covering the period of July 2006 to February 2014 on the relationship between sexual orientation and weight. The review includes 20 population-based and 17 nonprobability sample studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of these studies found that lesbian and bisexual women had significantly greater body mass index (BMI) or a higher percentage with a BMI over 30 than heterosexual women. The difference in BMI was fairly consistent across the lifespan, with the weight differences beginning in adolescence. The studies, however, did not show a higher prevalence of physical disorders thought to be associated with weight. This potentially paradoxical finding warrants further research to compare prevalence of chronic disease by BMI category and sexual orientation.

Challenges in Intervention Research for Lesbian and Bisexual Women

PURPOSE

More than one-third of U.S. adults are obese, the highest prevalence occurring among women age 60 and older (42.3%), and women ages 40 to 59 (36.0%). This issue is even more pronounced among lesbian and bisexual (LB) women. Studies suggest this population may be twice as likely to be overweight or obese as heterosexual women. Despite this public health issue, little has been done to reduce overweight and obesity in LB women.

METHODS

During the design of healthy-weight interventions aimed at reducing overweight and obesity in older LB women through increased physical activity and improved nutrition, we conducted a systematic review of health interventions targeting older LB women to identify and describe core characteristics present in such interventions. We identified 878 articles and studies as potentially relevant to our review and evaluated them for inclusion in our analysis. We analyzed five interventions, including two on smoking cessation and one each on physical activity, breast cancer screening, and alcohol abuse.

RESULTS

Results indicate that, regardless of desired health outcome, typical intervention characteristics included: social support, education, goal setting, peer-based facilitation, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)-friendly intervention environments.

CONCLUSION

The lack of health interventions in this population is disconcerting. Coupled with the high and disparate prevalence of overweight and obesity in LB women, the lack of published evidence of efforts targeting this population presents a critical opportunity for policymakers and researchers to respond to this public health concern.

Hospital leadership perspectives on the contributions of Ronald McDonald Houses

Purpose

– The purpose of this paper is to describe an international survey of hospital executives and administrators’ perspectives on the contributions of their affiliation with a Ronald McDonald House (RMH) as an example of accommodation in family-centered care to the hospital’s mission, operations and patient experience.

Design/methodology/approach

– RMHs worldwide provided the names and e-mail addresses of the people holding key leadership positions in their main hospital partner, who in turn were invited to complete an internet-based survey (530 participants; response rate of 54.5 percent).

Findings

– Hospital leaders reported very positive opinions about the contributions of their RMHs affiliation to their ability to serve seriously ill children and their families. This included such important outcomes as increasing family integrity and family participation in care decisions; and decreasing psychosocial stress and hospital social work resource burdens associated with lodging, food, transportation and sibling support. Hospital chief executive offices (CEOs) and medical directors reported very strong and positive opinions regarding the value-added of their RMHs affiliation in many areas, including enhanced marketing of hospital specialty services and reduced length of stay.

Research limitations/implications

– Survey response bias is a limitation, although the results are still useful in terms of identifying multiple ways in which RMHs are perceived as contributing to hospitals’ operations and provision of family-centered care.

Practical implications

– Overall, the results suggest that, internationally, hospital leaders believe that RMHs play a key and valued role in their provision of family-centered care to seriously ill children and their families.

Social implications

– Family accommodation is more than the simple provision of lodging and plays an integral role how hospitals approach family-centered care.

Originality/value

– This international study contributes to the general literature on the role of family accommodation in hospitals’ provision of family-centered care and the specific and very sparse literature on RMHs in particular.

The role of community health centers in providing behavioral health care

The prevalence of behavioral health problems is higher for low-income individuals, yet this population is less likely to receive behavioral health treatment. Community health centers have their advantages as behavioral health-care providers because they serve a majority low-income population and are located in medically underserved areas. Their role in providing behavioral health care is expected to expand under health reform as they are expected to double their patient capacity, and due to increased insurance coverage for individuals with behavioral health problems. However, the ability of community health centers to provide behavioral health care is compromised by provider shortages and funding shortfalls.

State purchasing and enforcement quality care for children in Medicaid and SCHIP managed care

State Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) agencies play pivotal roles in ensuring that participating health plans provide quality care. In 2003, researchers interviewed SCHIP officials with oversight responsibilities in nine states and found that all agencies had formal monitoring procedures and that all of them regularly collected data that measured health plans' compliance with quantifiable standards. Several states designed a graduated incentive and penalty system, which they believed favored compliance. Many agencies also stressed the need for collaboration with participating plans, because of underlying systemic barriers. None of the surveyed states considered their contractual agreements with health plans as all-encompassing on quality improvement, which underscores the importance of additional, noncontractual strategies to improve the quality of care. The survey found a disparity between state expectations for health plan performance and the realities of the delivery system, including the priorities of health plans and providers. The sample states were good monitors who enforced general contractual standards of pediatric quality of care; however, one shortcoming was found. Few of the surveyed states focused on oral disease or lead poisoning as part of their overall quality improvement efforts.

Reasonable modification or fundamental alteration? Recent developments in ADA caselaw and implications for behavioral health policy

This issue brief examines the concept of fundamental alteration under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); specifically it considers when proposed modifications of public programs under Title II of the ADA will be considered to amount to the type of fundamental alteration that lies beyond judicial power to compel. The issue of when a program change constitutes a fundamental alteration is important in state community integration planning efforts, since these types of changes will require legislative action.

Behavioral health and managed care contracting under SCHIP

This Policy Brief examines behavioral health managed care contracting under separately administered State Children's Health Insurance Programs (SCHIP), i.e., programs that operate under the direct authority of Title XXI of the Social Security Act rather than as expansions of Medicaid. Most separate SCHIP programs buy managed care style health insurance for some or most of their enrolled children. Because Title XXI provides states with far greater administrative flexibility than Medicaid with respect to coverage and benefit design, provision of services, and administration of managed care arrangements,studying separate SCHIP managed care products sheds important light on how states might approach insurance and managed care design generally in the area of behavioral health were Medicaid modified through section 1115 demonstration or federal statutory authority to permit greater latitude. To conduct this analysis, two nationwide databases maintained by the George Washington University Center for Health Services Research and Policy (CHSRP) were used: a database consisting of all Medicaid MCO-style managed care contracts in use in Calendar Year 2000; and a nationwide database consisting of contracts used by separate SCHIP programs for the same calendar year. As of the point of collection in 2000 there were 33 such separate programs; according to CMS' latest website information, that total has now reached 35. Both sets of contracts were analyzed and separated into their components by lawyers experienced in managed care contract analysis and interpretation. The data were entered into working tables that organize the contents of the contracts into a series of searchable domains.

Evaluation of agreements between managed care organizations and providers of community-based mental illness and addiction disorder treatments

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the scope, content, and nature of contracts between managed care organizations (MCOs) and community-based mental illness and addiction disorder treatment and prevention service providers, focusing on implications for managed care policy.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative and quantitative document content analysis.

METHODS

We reviewed and coded 107 provider contracts from 17 states. Data were aggregated on MCO and provider demographics, scope of services, contractual obligations, and financial reimbursement mechanisms. Results were compared with those from a similar study conducted in 1996 with a sample of 50 contracts to identify changes over time.

RESULTS

The MCOs purchased relatively few services from providers, omitting many services integral to the proper management of mental illness and addiction disorders. Service duties were often ambiguously described, leading to potentially significant and unanticipated financial risk for providers. The MCOs exert strong control over treatment decision making. Capitation and other risk-based payment arrangements are increasingly common, although most continue to use fee-for-service reimbursement methods. Contracts are structured to remove provider bargaining power; they allow MCOs to unilaterally amend all provisions on notice and without negotiation and permit termination "at will."

CONCLUSIONS

Managed care contracts favor the needs of the managed care industry and are constructed to (1) shift significant amounts of financial risk onto providers and (2) manage and restrain providers' choices over the use of benefits through close oversight, financial controls, and incentives. Because a signed contract is a precondition to access to patients and insurance revenues, health professionals must sign them and indicate a general inability to negotiate their terms.

Care coordination and physical and behavioral service integration in managed care contracts: analysis and sample purchasing specifications

This double Issue Brief on the issue of managed care contracts and care coordination has been prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration as part of a series that examines legal issues in managed care for persons with mental illness and addiction disorders. This Issue Brief is presented in two parts. Part 1 presents an analysis, based on managed care contract data bases developed by CHSRP, of the extent to which public and private group purchasers maintain agreements that specify care coordination as part of the standard of care for persons with co-occurring physical and/or behavioral illnesses and conditions. Part 2 sets forth sample purchasing specifications that are designed to establish care coordination as part of the standard of care.

An evaluation of agreements between managed care organizations and community-based mental illness and addiction disorder treatment and prevention providers

This Issue Brief, prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), examines contracts between managed care organizations (MCOs) and community-based providers of mental illness and addiction disorder treatment and prevention services (MI/AD providers). Building upon initial research published in 1997, this brief explores in depth one of the most hidden aspects of managed care: the relationship between the managed care organizations and health care providers.