1
|
Ramírez-Palacios P, Chen A, Flores YN, Crespi CM, Lazcano-Ponce E, Alvarez-Escobedo D, Torres-Ibarra L, Rivera-Paredez B, León-Maldonado L, Hernández-López R, Mendiola-Pastrana IR, Méndez-Hernández P, Cuzick J, Carmona E, Figueroa H, Montiel-Cordero F, Meneses-León J, Rao J, Salmerón J. Benefit of double-reading cytology smears as a triage strategy among high-risk human papillomavirus-positive women in Mexico. Cancer Cytopathol 2020; 128:715-724. [PMID: 32520446 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to determine whether the detection of histologically confirmed cases of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) can be increased by having each liquid-based cytology (LBC) slide read by 2 cytotechnologists as part of routine screening. METHODS Over 36,212 women aged 30 to 64 years participated in the Forwarding Research for Improved Detection and Access for Cervical Cancer Screening and Triage (FRIDA) Study in Mexico between 2013 and 2016. For each participant, 2 cervical samples were collected at the same clinic visit, one to test for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) and the other for LBC, which was used to triage those with a hrHPV positive result. LBC slides were evaluated by 7 cytotechnologists, with each slide read independently by 2 blinded cytotechnologists. All women with atypical cells of undetermined significance or a worse result were referred to colposcopy for further evaluation and diagnosis. Three pathologists evaluated the biopsy specimens to confirm the final HSIL+ diagnosis. The HSIL+ detection rates for the single versus double reading were estimated and compared. RESULTS A total of 3,914 women with a positive hrHPV result were triaged with LBC. The first and second cytology readings resulted in 43 HSIL+ cases detected; the double-reading strategy detected 9 additional HSIL+ cases, resulting in a total of 52 HSIL+ cases. The HSIL+ detection rate increased from 10.99/1000 with a single reading to 13.29/1000 with the double-reading strategy (P = .004). CONCLUSION A 20.9% increase in HSIL+ cases detected was achieved with a double reading of the LBC slides in this sample of hrHPV-positive women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Ramírez-Palacios
- Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud, Delegación Morelos, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Aiyu Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Yvonne N Flores
- Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud, Delegación Morelos, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Department of Health Policy and Management and Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California
- UCLA Cancer Prevention and Control Research Center, Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Catherine M Crespi
- Department of Biostatistics, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California
- UCLA Cancer Prevention and Control Research Center, Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Daniel Alvarez-Escobedo
- Unidad de Medicina Familiar, Hospital General Regional No. 1, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Leticia Torres-Ibarra
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Berenice Rivera-Paredez
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Rubí Hernández-López
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Indira R Mendiola-Pastrana
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Pablo Méndez-Hernández
- Departamento de Calidad y Educación en Salud, Secretaria de Salud Tlaxcala, Santa Ana Chiautempan, Mexico
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, Zacatelco, Mexico
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Héctor Figueroa
- Laboratorio de Citología, Laboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública, Tlaxcala, México
| | | | - Joacim Meneses-León
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Jianyu Rao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jorge Salmerón
- Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Centro de Investigación en Políticas, Población y Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|