Immunosuppression causes dynamic changes in expression QTLs in psoriatic skin

Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic inflammatory condition primarily affecting skin. While the role of the immune compartment (e.g., T cells) is well established, the changes in the skin compartment are more poorly understood. Using longitudinal skin biopsies (n = 375) from the "Psoriasis Treatment with Abatacept and Ustekinumab: A Study of Efficacy"(PAUSE) clinical trial (n = 101), we report 953 expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Of those, 116 eQTLs have effect sizes that were modulated by local skin inflammation (eQTL interactions). By examining these eQTL genes (eGenes), we find that most are expressed in the skin tissue compartment, and a subset overlap with the NRF2 pathway. Indeed, the strongest eQTL interaction signal - rs1491377616-LCE3C - links a psoriasis risk locus with a gene specifically expressed in the epidermis. This eQTL study highlights the potential to use biospecimens from clinical trials to discover in vivo eQTL interactions with therapeutically relevant environmental variables.

Effect of Costimulatory Blockade With Abatacept After Ustekinumab Withdrawal in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: The PAUSE Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Does blockade of CD28/B7 costimulatory signaling with abatacept suppress the psoriasis molecular signature and prevent psoriasis relapse after ustekinumab withdrawal?

Findings

In this parallel-design, double-blind randomized clinical trial of 91 adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, costimulatory blockade with abatacept did not prevent psoriasis relapse and did not maintain suppression of the pathogenic psoriasis molecular signature following ustekinumab withdrawal.

Meaning

In this study, abatacept did not prevent psoriasis relapse, which may rely on alternative, compensatory mechanisms of residual T-cell activation in skin.

Importance

Psoriasis relapse may involve compensatory T-cell activation pathways in the presence of CD28-CD80/CD86 blockade with abatacept.

Objective

To determine whether costimulatory signaling blockade with abatacept prevents psoriasis relapse after ustekinumab withdrawal.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Psoriasis Treatment with Abatacept and Ustekinumab: a Study of Efficacy (PAUSE), a parallel-design, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, was conducted at 10 sites in the US and Canada. Participant enrollment opened on March 19, 2014, and concluded on April 11, 2016. Participants were adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and received ustekinumab in a lead-in phase. Those who responded to ustekinumab at week 12 were randomized 1:1 to either the continued with ustekinumab group (ustekinumab group) or the switched to abatacept group (abatacept group). Treatment was discontinued at week 39, and participants were followed up for psoriasis relapse until week 88. Statistical analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and safety samples from May 3, 2018, to July 6, 2021.

Interventions

Participants received subcutaneous ustekinumab at weeks 0 and 4 (45 mg per dose for those ≤100 kg; 90 mg per dose for those >100 kg). Participants randomized to the abatacept group at week 12 received subcutaneous abatacept, 125 mg weekly, from weeks 12 to 39 and ustekinumab placebo at weeks 16 and 28. Participants randomized to the ustekinumab group received ustekinumab at weeks 16 and 28 and abatacept placebo weekly from weeks 12 to 39.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the proportion of participants with psoriasis relapse (loss of ≥50% of the initial Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement) between weeks 12 and 88. Secondary end points included time to psoriasis relapse, proportion of participants with psoriasis relapse between weeks 12 and 40, and adverse events. The psoriasis transcriptome and serum cytokines were evaluated.

Results

A total of 108 participants (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [12.1] years; 73 [67.6%] men) were treated with open-label ustekinumab; 91 were randomized to blinded treatment. Similar proportions of participants in the abatacept group and the ustekinumab group relapsed between weeks 12 and 88 (41 of 45 [91.1%] vs 40 of 46 [87.0%]; P = .41). Median time to relapse from the last dose of ustekinumab was similar between groups as well: 36 weeks (95% CI, 36-48 weeks) in the abatacept group vs 32 weeks (95% CI, 28-40 weeks) in the ustekinumab group. Similar numbers and rates of adverse events occurred. Abatacept did not maintain suppression of the pathogenic IL-23-mediated psoriasis molecular signature in lesions after ustekinumab withdrawal, and serum IL-19 levels increased.

Conclusions and Relevance

This parallel-design, double-blind randomized clinical trial found that abatacept did not prevent psoriasis relapse that occurred after ustekinumab withdrawal because it did not completely block the pathogenic psoriasis molecular pathways that led to relapse.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01999868

Approaches to Establishing Tolerance in Immune Mediated Diseases

The development of rational approaches to restore immune tolerance requires an iterative approach that builds on past success and utilizes new mechanistic insights into immune-mediated pathologies. This article will review concepts that have evolved from the clinical trial experience of the Immune Tolerance Network, with an emphasis on lessons learned from the innovative mechanistic studies conducted for these trials and new strategies under development for induction of tolerance.

Profiling CIS progression and stability using RNA-seq single-cell analysis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Objective:

To use single-cell mRNA analyses to identify immune cell profiles in CIS patients associated with a higher risk of developing an MS relapse or new central nervous system (CNS) disease activity on brain MRI.

Methods:

Cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected at study entry and six months from six CIS participants in the ITN020AI STAyCIS trial of atorvastatin. Three participants met the primary endpoint defined as ≥ 3 new T2 lesions on MRI or an MS relapse within 12 months, while the other three did not. RNA from about 10,000 PBMC per sample were identified at the single-cell level using the 10X Genomics Chromium platform and analyzed using Cell Ranger software. Seurat R software package was used for downstream analysis.

Results:

31 clusters of differentially expressed genes were assigned as specific cell types; baseline frequencies of clusters enriched >2-fold for macrophage, NK, NKT, CD4+ T cell, and B cell markers were associated with disparate outcomes at six months. Several clusters of B cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were expanded from baseline at six months in participants with CNS disease activity at that time point, while no notable changes were observed in those with stable disease.

Conclusion:

Our results show varied frequencies of innate and adaptive leukocyte populations in participants with disparate clinical outcomes, suggesting a predictive biomarker for aggressive early intervention. Expanded clusters of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and B cells in blood at the time of disease activity may identify biomarkers leading to acute demyelination. Follow-up studies are underway to increase sample size and incorporate protein data to better define cell subtypes associated with disparate outcomes in the STAyCIS trial.

Phase II Randomized Trial of Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Belimumab for the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

Objective

To assess the safety, mechanism of action, and preliminary efficacy of rituximab followed by belimumab in the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods

In a multicenter, randomized, open‐label clinical trial, 43 patients with recurrent or refractory LN were treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide (CYC), and glucocorticoids followed by weekly belimumab infusions until week 48 (RCB group), or treated with rituximab and CYC but no belimumab infusions (RC group). Patients were followed up until week 96. Percentages of total and autoreactive B cell subsets in the patients’ peripheral blood were analyzed by flow cytometry.

Results

Treatment with belimumab did not increase the incidence of adverse events in patients with refractory LN. At week 48, a complete or partial renal response occurred in 11 (52%) of 21 patients receiving belimumab, compared to 9 (41%) of 22 patients in the RC group who did not receive belimumab (P = 0.452). Lack of improvement in or worsening of LN was the major reason for treatment failure. B cell depletion occurred in both groups, but the percentage of B cells remained lower in those receiving belimumab (geometric mean number of B cells at week 60, 53 cells/μl in the RCB group versus 11 cells/μl in the RC group; P = 0.0012). Percentages of total and autoreactive transitional B cells increased from baseline to week 48 in both groups. However, percentages of total and autoreactive naive B cells decreased from baseline to week 48 in the belimumab group compared to the no belimumab RC group (P = 0.0349), a finding that is consistent with the observed impaired maturation of naive B cells and enhanced censoring of autoreactive B cells.

Conclusion

The addition of belimumab to a treatment regimen with rituximab and CYC was safe in patients with refractory LN. This regimen diminished maturation of transitional to naive B cells during B cell reconstitution, and enhanced the negative selection of autoreactive B cells. Clinical efficacy was not improved with rituximab and CYC in combination with belimumab when compared to a therapeutic strategy of B cell depletion alone in patients with LN.

The immune cell landscape in kidneys of patients with lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis is a potentially fatal autoimmune disease for which the current treatment is ineffective and often toxic. To develop mechanistic hypotheses of disease, we analyzed kidney samples from patients with lupus nephritis and from healthy control subjects using single-cell RNA sequencing. Our analysis revealed 21 subsets of leukocytes active in disease, including multiple populations of myeloid cells, T cells, natural killer cells and B cells that demonstrated both pro-inflammatory responses and inflammation-resolving responses. We found evidence of local activation of B cells correlated with an age-associated B-cell signature and evidence of progressive stages of monocyte differentiation within the kidney. A clear interferon response was observed in most cells. Two chemokine receptors, CXCR4 and CX3CR1, were broadly expressed, implying a potentially central role in cell trafficking. Gene expression of immune cells in urine and kidney was highly correlated, which would suggest that urine might serve as a surrogate for kidney biopsies.

ACCLAIM: A randomized trial of abatacept (CTLA4-Ig) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Costimulatory blockade of T lymphocytes with the CTLA4-Ig fusion protein abatacept could be an effective treatment for the immune-mediated neuroinflammatory disease relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of abatacept in RRMS.

METHODS

ACCLAIM (A Cooperative Clinical Study of Abatacept in Multiple Sclerosis) was a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial. In all, 65 of 123 planned participants with RRMS were randomized to monthly intravenous infusions of abatacept or placebo for 24 weeks in a 2:1 ratio, switched to the opposite treatment at 28 weeks, and received their final dose of study medication at 52 weeks. Enrollment was closed early due to slow accrual. The primary endpoint was the mean number of new gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions obtained on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans performed every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed in mean number of new Gd+ MRI lesions between the abatacept and placebo groups. No statistically significant differences were observed in other MRI and clinical parameters of RRMS disease activity. Abatacept was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The ACCLAIM study did not demonstrate efficacy of abatacept in reducing the number of new Gd+ MRI lesions, or clinical measures of disease activity in RRMS.

Solving the puzzle of autoimmunity: critical questions

Despite recent advances in delineating the pathogenic mechanisms of autoimmune disease, the puzzle that reveals the true picture of these diverse immunological disorders is yet to be solved. We know that the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) loci as well as many different genetic susceptibility loci with relatively small effect sizes predispose to various autoimmune diseases and that environmental factors are involved in triggering disease. Models for mechanisms of disease become increasingly complex as relationships between components of both the adaptive and innate immune systems are untangled at the molecular level. In this article, we pose some of the important questions about autoimmunity where the answers will advance our understanding of disease pathogenesis and improve the rational design of novel therapies. How is autoimmunity triggered, and what components of the immune response drive the clinical manifestations of disease? What determines whether a genetically predisposed individual will develop an autoimmune disease? Is restoring immune tolerance the secret to finding cures for autoimmune disease? Current research efforts seek answers to these big questions.

Restoring the balance: immunotherapeutic combinations for autoimmune disease

Autoimmunity occurs when T cells, B cells or both are inappropriately activated, resulting in damage to one or more organ systems. Normally, high-affinity self-reactive T and B cells are eliminated in the thymus and bone marrow through a process known as central immune tolerance. However, low-affinity self-reactive T and B cells escape central tolerance and enter the blood and tissues, where they are kept in check by complex and non-redundant peripheral tolerance mechanisms. Dysfunction or imbalance of the immune system can lead to autoimmunity, and thus elucidation of normal tolerance mechanisms has led to identification of therapeutic targets for treating autoimmune disease. In the past 15 years, a number of disease-modifying monoclonal antibodies and genetically engineered biologic agents targeting the immune system have been approved, notably for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis. Although these agents represent a major advance, effective therapy for other autoimmune conditions, such as type 1 diabetes, remain elusive and will likely require intervention aimed at multiple components of the immune system. To this end, approaches that manipulate cells ex vivo and harness their complex behaviors are being tested in preclinical and clinical settings. In addition, approved biologic agents are being examined in combination with one another and with cell-based therapies. Substantial development and regulatory hurdles must be overcome in order to successfully combine immunotherapeutic biologic agents. Nevertheless, such combinations might ultimately be necessary to control autoimmune disease manifestations and restore the tolerant state.

Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Induced with a Combination of Myelin Basic Protein and Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Is Ameliorated by Administration of a Single Myelin Basic Protein Peptide

Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system in which T cell reactivity to several myelin proteins, including myelin basic protein (MBP), proteolipid protein, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), has been implicated in the perpetuation of the disease state. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is used commonly as a model in which potential therapies for multiple sclerosis are evaluated. The ability of T cell epitope-containing peptides to down-regulate the disease course is well documented for both MBP- and proteolipid protein-induced EAE, and recently has been shown for MOG-induced EAE. In this study, we describe a novel EAE model, in which development of severe disease symptoms in (PL/J × SJL)F1 mice is dependent on reactivity to two different immunizing Ags, MBP and MOG. The disease is often fatal, with a relapsing/progressive course in survivors, and is more severe than would be predicted by immunization with either Ag alone. The MOG plus MBP disease can be treated postinduction with a combination of the MOG 41–60 peptide (identified as the major therapeutic MOG epitope for this strain) and the MBP Ac1–11[4Y] peptide. A significant treatment effect can also be obtained by administration of the MBP peptide alone, but this effect is strictly dose dependent. This MBP peptide does not treat the disease induced only with MOG. These results suggest that peptide immunotherapy can provide an effective means of mitigating disease in this model, even when the treatment is targeted to only one component epitope or one component protein Ag of a diverse autoimmune response.

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induced with a combination of myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein is ameliorated by administration of a single myelin basic protein peptide

Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system in which T cell reactivity to several myelin proteins, including myelin basic protein (MBP), proteolipid protein, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), has been implicated in the perpetuation of the disease state. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is used commonly as a model in which potential therapies for multiple sclerosis are evaluated. The ability of T cell epitope-containing peptides to down-regulate the disease course is well documented for both MBP- and proteolipid protein-induced EAE, and recently has been shown for MOG-induced EAE. In this study, we describe a novel EAE model, in which development of severe disease symptoms in (PL/J x SJL)F1 mice is dependent on reactivity to two different immunizing Ags, MBP and MOG. The disease is often fatal, with a relapsing/progressive course in survivors, and is more severe than would be predicted by immunization with either Ag alone. The MOG plus MBP disease can be treated postinduction with a combination of the MOG 41-60 peptide (identified as the major therapeutic MOG epitope for this strain) and the MBP Ac1-11[4Y] peptide. A significant treatment effect can also be obtained by administration of the MBP peptide alone, but this effect is strictly dose dependent. This MBP peptide does not treat the disease induced only with MOG. These results suggest that peptide immunotherapy can provide an effective means of mitigating disease in this model, even when the treatment is targeted to only one component epitope or one component protein Ag of a diverse autoimmune response.

Induction of a heterogeneous TCR repertoire in (PL/JXSJL/J)F1 mice by myelin basic protein peptide Ac1-11 and its analog Ac1-11[4A]

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) serves as a rodent model of the autoimmune disease multiple sclerosis. In mice, EAE is induced by immunizing with spinal cord homogenate, components of the myelin sheath, such as myelin basic protein (MBP) or proteolipid protein (PLP), or peptides derived from these components. EAE can be induced in H-2u or (H-2u x H-2s)F1 mice with the N-terminal peptide of MBP, Ac1-11. Coimmunization with Ac1-11 and Ac1-11[4A], an analog in which lysine at position four is substituted with alanine, prevents EAE. The mechanism of inhibition has not been elucidated, but probably does not work through MHC blockade, T cell anergy or clonal elimination of encephalitogenic T cells. We have isolated T cell clones and hybridomas from (PL/J x SJL/J)F1 mice immunized with either Ac1-11 alone or Ac1-11 and Ac1-11[4A] and analysed these cells for differences in their T cell receptor repertoire and in vitro response. Although T cells elicited by coinjection of Ac1-11 and Ac1-11[4A] expressed TCR that used V alpha and Vbeta gene elements similar to those elicited by Ac1-11 alone, they differed in the sequences of the junctional region of the alpha chain. Most of these T cells also responded less well to Ac1-11 in vitro, suggesting that coinjection of Ac1-11 and Ac1-11[4A] preferentially activates T cells bearing TCR of different affinity for Ac1-11 bound to I-A(u), and which may therefore be less encephalitogenic. Furthermore, our results show that a more diverse repertoire of V alpha and Vbeta genes are elicited by Ac1-11 in (PL/J x SJL/J)F1 mice compared to PL/J and B10.PL mice, providing further evidence that a restricted TCR repertoire is not required for the development of autoimmune disease.

Induction of EAE in mice with recombinant human MOG, and treatment of EAE with a MOG peptide

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed on the surface of central nervous system (CNS) myelin membranes, which has been shown to induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in rodents. Here we describe the induction of EAE in SJL and (PLJ X SJL)F1 mice with truncated human recombinant MOG (thr-MOG, amino acids 1-120) which has been expressed in insect cells in soluble form. We show that in SJL mice, immunization with thr-MOG produces an immune response to the 1-30 and the 81-110 regions of the MOG molecule. We also demonstrate effective treatment of thr-MOG-induced EAE in SJL mice with intravenous injections of a single peptide, MOG 91-110. These results support the possibility of treating MS using an antigen dependent approach.

Reversal of acute experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and prevention of relapses by treatment with a myelin basic protein peptide analogue modified to form long-lived peptide-MHC complexes

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an autoimmune disease induced by immunization with myelin basic protein (MBP), proteolipid protein, or encephalitogenic peptides from these myelin components. EAE resembles basic protein multiple sclerosis in some of its clinical and histologic features, and serves as an experimental model for this and other autoimmune diseases. In this study, we examine i.v. peptide therapy of EAE in detail, and show that repeated i.v. injections of MBP peptides effectively treat EAE in (PLJxSJL)F1 mice. In this study, administration of the immunodominant epitope (MBP Ac1-11) prevents MBP-induced disease, whereas the subdominant epitope MBP 31-47 is neither required nor sufficient. Intravenous administration of substituted MBP peptide analogues is also effective in treating EAE, provided the peptide side chains presumed to be involved in TCR contact and MHC binding are preserved. A substituted MBP peptide analogue that forms long-lived peptide-MHC complexes in vivo is more effective than the unmodified MBP peptide. Lower doses of the substituted peptide analogue are effective, and the effect is longer lasting than treatment with the unmodified peptide. Clinical signs of EAE are reversed by injection of the substituted peptide during the acute phase of disease. Moreover, treatment of mice in the remission phase of EAE results in a dramatically reduced incidence of relapse. In summary, we have shown that EAE can be reversed after onset and treated during remission with an MBP peptide analogue that has been modified for improved therapeutic potency.

Reversal of acute experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and prevention of relapses by treatment with a myelin basic protein peptide analogue modified to form long-lived peptide-MHC complexes

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an autoimmune disease induced by immunization with myelin basic protein (MBP), proteolipid protein, or encephalitogenic peptides from these myelin components. EAE resembles basic protein multiple sclerosis in some of its clinical and histologic features, and serves as an experimental model for this and other autoimmune diseases. In this study, we examine i.v. peptide therapy of EAE in detail, and show that repeated i.v. injections of MBP peptides effectively treat EAE in (PLJxSJL)F1 mice. In this study, administration of the immunodominant epitope (MBP Ac1-11) prevents MBP-induced disease, whereas the subdominant epitope MBP 31-47 is neither required nor sufficient. Intravenous administration of substituted MBP peptide analogues is also effective in treating EAE, provided the peptide side chains presumed to be involved in TCR contact and MHC binding are preserved. A substituted MBP peptide analogue that forms long-lived peptide-MHC complexes in vivo is more effective than the unmodified MBP peptide. Lower doses of the substituted peptide analogue are effective, and the effect is longer lasting than treatment with the unmodified peptide. Clinical signs of EAE are reversed by injection of the substituted peptide during the acute phase of disease. Moreover, treatment of mice in the remission phase of EAE results in a dramatically reduced incidence of relapse. In summary, we have shown that EAE can be reversed after onset and treated during remission with an MBP peptide analogue that has been modified for improved therapeutic potency.

Prevention of graft-versus-host disease by peptides binding to class II major histocompatibility complex molecules

Graft-versus-host disease across minor histocompatibility barriers was induced in two different models by transplanting allogeneic bone marrow and spleen cells into irradiated H-2-compatible recipient mice. In this report, we show that administration of peptides with high binding affinity for the respective class II major histocompatibility complex molecules after transplantation is capable of preventing the development of graft-versus-host disease in two different murine models. The peptides used were myelin basic protein residues 1 through 11 with alanine at position 4 (Ac 1-11[4A]) for I-Au (A alpha uA beta u), and the antigenic core sequence 323 through 339 of ovalbumin with lysine and methionine extension (KM core) for I-As (A alpha sA beta s). In both systems, the mechanism of prevention was found to be major histocompatibility complex-associated, because nonbinding control peptides did not have any effect. Engraftment of allogeneic bone marrow cells was shown by polymerase chain reaction analysis of DNA polymorphisms in a microsatellite region within the murine interleukin-5 gene.

Minimum structural requirements for peptide presentation by major histocompatibility complex class II molecules: implications in induction of autoimmunity

The precise mechanisms of failure of immunological tolerance to self proteins are not known. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) susceptibility alleles, the target peptides, and T cells with anti-self reactivity must be present to cause autoimmune diseases. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is a murine model of a human autoimmune disease, multiple sclerosis. In EAE, residues 1-11 of myelin basic protein (MBP) are the dominant disease-inducing determinants in PL/J and (PL/J x SJL/J)F1 mice. Here we report that a six-residue peptide (five of them native) of MBP can induce EAE. Using peptide analogues of the MBP-(1-11) peptide, we demonstrate that only four native MBP residues are required to stimulate MBP-specific T cells. Therefore, this study demonstrates lower minimum structural requirements for effective antigen presentation by MHC class II molecules. Many viral and bacterial proteins share short runs of amino acid similarity with host self proteins, a phenomenon known as molecular mimicry. Since a six-residue peptide can sensitize MBP-specific T cells to cause EAE, these results define a minimum sequence identity for molecular mimicry in autoimmunity.

A polyalanine peptide with only five native myelin basic protein residues induces autoimmune encephalomyelitis

The minimum structural requirements for peptide interactions with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules and with T cell receptors (TCRs) were examined. In this report we show that substituting alanines at all but five amino acids in the myelin basic protein (MBP) peptide Ac1-11 does not alter its ability to bind A alpha uA beta u (MHC class II molecules), to stimulate specific T cells and, surprisingly, to induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in (PL/J x SJL/J)F1 mice. Most other amino acid side chains in the Ac1-11 peptide are essentially irrelevant for T cell stimulation and for disease induction. Further analysis revealed that binding to A alpha uA beta u occurred with a peptide that consists mainly of alanines and only three of the original residues of Ac1-11. Moreover, when used as a coimmunogen with MBP Ac1-11, this peptide inhibited EAE. The finding that a specific in vivo response can be generated by a peptide containing only five native residues provides evidence that disease-inducing TCRs recognize only a very short sequence of the MHC-bound peptide.

Inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by a nonimmunogenic non-self peptide that binds to I-Au

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an inflammatory neurologic disease initiated by myelin basic protein-reactive CD4+ T cells, which are restricted by a particular MHC class II molecule. Recent studies have utilized inhibitor peptides that bind to restricting MHC class II molecules in order to inhibit EAE, presumably by means of competing with encephalitogenic epitopes. However, these studies leave open the possibility of alternative explanations, such as Ag-specific nonresponsiveness and immunodominance. In order to demonstrate that competition for MHC binding alone can inhibit EAE, the inhibitor peptide should ideally be structurally unrelated and nonimmunogenic yet physically associate with the MHC class II molecule. In this study, we show that the OVA-323-339 peptide, which is unrelated to the disease-inducing peptide, binds to A alpha uA beta u. However, although OVA-323-339 is extremely immunogenic in A alpha dA beta d-expressing BALB/c mice, it is nonimmunogenic in (PL/J x SJL)F1 and PL/J mice expressing A alpha uA beta u. When administered as a coimmunogen with Ac1-11, OVA-323-339 inhibited induction of EAE in (PL/J x SJL)F1 mice. Myelin basic protein-89-101, which does not bind A alpha uA beta u, had no effect on the disease process. This study provides evidence that MHC class II binding alone can modulate the induction of EAE. The use of a nonimmunogenic non-self peptide to modulate an autoimmune disease minimizes the potential complications of immunodominance or alternative regulatory mechanisms associated with immunogenic peptide therapies and further confirms the MHC-blocking model of immunosuppression.

Inhibition of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by a nonimmunogenic non-self peptide that binds to I-Au

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an inflammatory neurologic disease initiated by myelin basic protein-reactive CD4+ T cells, which are restricted by a particular MHC class II molecule. Recent studies have utilized inhibitor peptides that bind to restricting MHC class II molecules in order to inhibit EAE, presumably by means of competing with encephalitogenic epitopes. However, these studies leave open the possibility of alternative explanations, such as Ag-specific nonresponsiveness and immunodominance. In order to demonstrate that competition for MHC binding alone can inhibit EAE, the inhibitor peptide should ideally be structurally unrelated and nonimmunogenic yet physically associate with the MHC class II molecule. In this study, we show that the OVA-323-339 peptide, which is unrelated to the disease-inducing peptide, binds to A alpha uA beta u. However, although OVA-323-339 is extremely immunogenic in A alpha dA beta d-expressing BALB/c mice, it is nonimmunogenic in (PL/J x SJL)F1 and PL/J mice expressing A alpha uA beta u. When administered as a coimmunogen with Ac1-11, OVA-323-339 inhibited induction of EAE in (PL/J x SJL)F1 mice. Myelin basic protein-89-101, which does not bind A alpha uA beta u, had no effect on the disease process. This study provides evidence that MHC class II binding alone can modulate the induction of EAE. The use of a nonimmunogenic non-self peptide to modulate an autoimmune disease minimizes the potential complications of immunodominance or alternative regulatory mechanisms associated with immunogenic peptide therapies and further confirms the MHC-blocking model of immunosuppression.

MHC-binding peptides for immunotherapy of experimental autoimmune disease

It is now well accepted that T helper cells play a central role in the induction and maintenance of autoimmune disease. Many experimental models have emphasized this fact and have illustrated the efficacy of therapeutic strategies aimed at disrupting T cell recognition of autoantigens. Antibodies directed at either class II proteins of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) or CD4 accessory molecules have been universally successful. However, the potential use of antibodies for therapy in humans is complicated by host anti-globulin and anti-idiotype responses. An alternative approach to anti-MHC blockade with antibodies is peptide blockade of MHC molecules. In addition, peptides may be used as agonists of autoantigens in order to modulate the autoimmune response. The use of synthetic peptides for therapy is an innovative yet relatively unexplored approach and will be the subject for discussion in this article.

EAE: a model for immune intervention with synthetic peptides

The cellular and molecular requirements for the autoimmune disease EAE are being defined in increasing detail through intense scrutiny of critical autoantigenic peptides, class II MHC molecules, and alpha beta TCRs involved in the disease process. This study has led to novel immunotherapeutic approaches, many of which are based on the administration of synthetic peptides. Since short peptides are understood to be the minimal antigenic units bound by MHC molecules for recognition by T cells, they are attractive experimental tools for finely modulating specific immune responses. It is clear that a large number of defined peptides can dramatically influence the course of EAE. Table IV lists a number of potential mechanisms which may mediate disease prevention. Increasing evidence supports the idea that prevention of autoimmune disease can result from MHC-blockade by peptides which competitively bind to class II molecules. However, for some peptides such as the perplexing partial agonist Ac1-11[4A], the mechanism by which these precisely defined units act is not yet fully understood. Numerous hurdles hinder immediate clinical application of peptide-based immunotherapy. Nevertheless, the knowledge gained by probing experimental autoimmunity with defined peptides promises to inspire original and practical approaches to treating human autoimmune disease.

A single amino acid change in a myelin basic protein peptide confers the capacity to prevent rather than induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an experimental demyelinating disease of rodents. In (PL/J x SJL) F1 mice, it is induced by immunization with the myelin basic protein peptide Ac1-11. Ac1-11 [4A], a myelin basic protein peptide analog with a single amino acid substitution, (i) binds to class II major histocompatibility complex molecules and stimulates encephalitogenic T cells in vitro better than Ac1-11, (ii) is nonimmunogenic and nonencephalitogenic in vivo in (PL/J x SJL)F1 mice, (iii) prevents EAE when administered before or at the time of immunization with Ac1-11, and (iv) prevents EAE when administered later, near the time of disease onset. Initial studies suggest that Ac1-11 [4A] does not prevent EAE by competitive inhibition or by activation of regulatory cells. Thus, substitution of a single amino acid in a myelin basic protein peptide confers the capacity to prevent rather than induce EAE, even after peptide-specific encephalitogenic T cells have been activated.

T cell recognition in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: prospects for immune intervention with synthetic peptides

Peptide binding and lymph node T cell activation studies have been used to characterize T cell recognition of an encephalitogenic T cell autoantigen from myelin basic protein in mice of the H-2u haplotype. An important role for MHC class II molecules in "determinant selection" is revealed. Amino acids which determine interactions with either the restriction element of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) or the encephalitogenic T cell receptor are defined. This information enables the design of peptides which bind MHC yet do not crossreact with the autoantigen. Two such peptides compete with the autoantigen for binding to the disease associated class II molecule and inhibit induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in H-2u mice. Prospects for peptide mediated therapy are discussed.

Antigen recognition in autoimmune encephalomyelitis and the potential for peptide-mediated immunotherapy

Peptide binding and lymph node T cell activation studies have been used to characterize T cell recognition of an encephalitogenic T cell autoantigen from myelin basic protein in (PL/J x SJL)F1 mice. Amino acids that determine interactions with either the restriction element of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) or the encephalitogenic T cell receptor are defined. This information enables the design of peptides that bind MHC yet do not cross-react with the autoantigen. A peptide analog of the encephalitogenic epitope is shown to be "heteroclitic" for MHC binding and activation of encephalitogenic T cells in vitro. This analog is not immunogenic for encephalitogenic T cells in vivo and is shown to inhibit disease that is induced by the autoantigen itself.

Class I major histocompatibility gene products of the brown Norway rat display two major antigenic regions

Sixteen Lewis anti-Brown Norway monoclonal antibodies and sera from alloimmunized Lewis rats were used to study the topographic relationships of antigenic determinants on class I major histocompatibility gene products. Only two independent antigenic regions were identified in competition binding assays. The first region is composed of a set of overlapping epitopes that are conserved in class I major histocompatibility products of mice and humans, as well as rats. In contrast, the second antigenic region appears in a restricted number of inbred rat strains and is not detected in other species. The data provide serologic confirmation, at the monoclonal and serum alloantibody level, of conserved polymorphisms in the major histocompatibility gene products of different species, a finding that is consistent with the amino acid sequences of these molecules.

Class I major histocompatibility gene products of the brown Norway rat display two major antigenic regions

Sixteen Lewis anti-Brown Norway monoclonal antibodies and sera from alloimmunized Lewis rats were used to study the topographic relationships of antigenic determinants on class I major histocompatibility gene products. Only two independent antigenic regions were identified in competition binding assays. The first region is composed of a set of overlapping epitopes that are conserved in class I major histocompatibility products of mice and humans, as well as rats. In contrast, the second antigenic region appears in a restricted number of inbred rat strains and is not detected in other species. The data provide serologic confirmation, at the monoclonal and serum alloantibody level, of conserved polymorphisms in the major histocompatibility gene products of different species, a finding that is consistent with the amino acid sequences of these molecules.

Monoclonal rat anti-MHC alloantibodies detect HLA-linked polymorphisms in humans

Two monoclonal rat anti-MHC alloantibodies detect a polymorphic determinant expressed on the peripheral lymphocytes of normal human donors. The pattern of cytotoxicity observed with these antibodies correlated with the HLA type of the individual; no HLA-A-locus specificities showed significant associations, and all of the HLA-B-locus specificities showing significant association were members of the Bw6 supertype. Family studies established that the determinant detected by the monoclonal antibodies is linked to HLA. These studies therefore provide an alternative basis for the production of monoclonal antibodies to polymorphic HLA determinants based on the conservation of polymorphic MHC determinants between man and rats.

Monoclonal rat anti-major histocompatibility complex antibodies display specificity for rat, mouse, and human target cells

24 monoclonal rat antibodies are described that are reactive with determinants encoded by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) of the rat. These hybridoma antibodies were derived by fusing mutant mouse myeloma cells to spleen cells from Lewis rats immunized with allogeneic Brown Norway cells. All 24 antibodies are cytotoxic for both Brown Norway target cells and target cells from the appropriate MHC congenic rats. Pattern of cytotoxicity and hemagglutination strongly suggest reactivity against class I (K or D equivalent) rat MHC determinants. Cytotoxic cross-reactivity patterns were generated for each monoclonal antibody on a panel of rat and mouse lymphoid cells and human peripheral T lymphocytes. A high degree of interspecies cross-reactivity was noted with approximately one-half of the antibodies positive on human and/or mouse target cells. 11 antibodies recognized polymorphic determinants in the mouse, and, by using target cells from MHC congenic mouse strains, it was shown that these determinants are encoded by genes within the H-2 complex. Finally, by considering the overall reactivity patterns of these monclonal antibodies on all target cells, one can show that these 24 antibodies represent a minimum of 14 antibody specificities.