2
|
Huttlin EL, Ting L, Bruckner RJ, Gebreab F, Gygi MP, Szpyt J, Tam S, Zarraga G, Colby G, Baltier K, Dong R, Guarani V, Vaites LP, Ordureau A, Rad R, Erickson BK, Wühr M, Chick J, Zhai B, Kolippakkam D, Mintseris J, Obar RA, Harris T, Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Sowa ME, De Camilli P, Paulo JA, Harper JW, Gygi SP. The BioPlex Network: A Systematic Exploration of the Human Interactome. Cell 2015; 162:425-440. [PMID: 26186194 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 963] [Impact Index Per Article: 107.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2014] [Revised: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 06/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Protein interactions form a network whose structure drives cellular function and whose organization informs biological inquiry. Using high-throughput affinity-purification mass spectrometry, we identify interacting partners for 2,594 human proteins in HEK293T cells. The resulting network (BioPlex) contains 23,744 interactions among 7,668 proteins with 86% previously undocumented. BioPlex accurately depicts known complexes, attaining 80%-100% coverage for most CORUM complexes. The network readily subdivides into communities that correspond to complexes or clusters of functionally related proteins. More generally, network architecture reflects cellular localization, biological process, and molecular function, enabling functional characterization of thousands of proteins. Network structure also reveals associations among thousands of protein domains, suggesting a basis for examining structurally related proteins. Finally, BioPlex, in combination with other approaches, can be used to reveal interactions of biological or clinical significance. For example, mutations in the membrane protein VAPB implicated in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis perturb a defined community of interactors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Huttlin
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Lily Ting
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Raphael J Bruckner
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Fana Gebreab
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Melanie P Gygi
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - John Szpyt
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Stanley Tam
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Gabriela Zarraga
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Greg Colby
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Kurt Baltier
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Rui Dong
- Department of Cell Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA
| | - Virginia Guarani
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Alban Ordureau
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Ramin Rad
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Brian K Erickson
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Martin Wühr
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Joel Chick
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Bo Zhai
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Deepak Kolippakkam
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Julian Mintseris
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Robert A Obar
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Biogen, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | | | - Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Biogen, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Mathew E Sowa
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Pietro De Camilli
- Department of Cell Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA
| | - Joao A Paulo
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - J Wade Harper
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Steven P Gygi
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
UNLABELLED We report a comprehensive and quantitative analysis of the mouse liver and plasma proteomes. The method used is based on extensive fractionation of intact proteins, further separation of proteins based on their abundance and size, and high-accuracy mass spectrometry. This analysis reached a depth in proteomic profiling not reported to date for a mammalian tissue or a biological fluid, with 7099 and 4727 proteins identified with high confidence in the liver and in the corresponding plasma, respectively. This method allowed for the identification in both compartments of low-abundance proteins such as cytokines, chemokines, and receptors and for the detection in plasma of proteins in the pg/mL concentration range. This method also allowed for semiquantitation of all identified proteins. The calculated abundance scores correlated with the abundance of the corresponding transcripts for the large majority of the proteins identified in the liver. Finally, comparison of the liver and plasma datasets demonstrated that a significant number of proteins identified in the liver can be detected in plasma. These included proteins involved in complement and coagulation, in fatty acid, purine and pyruvate metabolism, in gluconeogenesis and glycolysis, in protein ubiquitination, and in insulin, interleukin-4, epidermal growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor signaling. CONCLUSION This in-depth analysis of the mouse liver and corresponding plasma proteomes provides a strong basis for investigations of liver pathobiology and biology that employ mouse models of hepatic diseases in an effort to better understand, diagnose, treat, and prevent human hepatic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keane K Y Lai
- Molecular Diagnostics Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parent R, Kolippakkam D, Booth G, Beretta L. Mammalian target of rapamycin activation impairs hepatocytic differentiation and targets genes moderating lipid homeostasis and hepatocellular growth. Cancer Res 2007; 67:4337-45. [PMID: 17483347 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-3640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, a major regulator of translation, is frequently activated in hepatocellular carcinomas. We investigated the effects of mTOR activation in the human HepaRG cells, which possess potent hepatocytic differentiation capability. Differentiation of HepaRG cells into functional and polarized hepatocyte-like cells correlated with a decrease in mTOR and Akt activities. Stable cell lines expressing an activated mutant of mTOR were generated. Sustained activation of mTOR impaired the hepatocytic differentiation capability of these cells as shown by impaired formation of bile canaliculi, absence of polarity, and reduced secretion of alpha1-antitrypsin. An inhibitor of mTOR, rapamycin, was able to revert this phenotype. Furthermore, increased mTOR activity in HepaRG cells resulted in their resistance to the antiproliferative effects of transforming growth factor-beta1. Profiling of polysome-bound transcripts indicated that activated mTOR specifically targeted genes posttranscriptionally regulated on hepatocytic differentiation. Three major biological networks targeted by activated mTOR were identified: (a) cell death associated with tumor necrosis factor superfamily members, IFNs and caspases; (b) lipid homeostasis associated with the transcription factors PPARalpha, PPARdelta, and retinoid X receptor beta; and (c) liver development associated with CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha and hepatic mitogens. In conclusion, increased mTOR activity conferred a preneoplastic phenotype to the HepaRG cells by altering the translation of genes vital for establishing normal hepatic energy homeostasis and moderating hepatocellular growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Parent
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ait-Ghezala G, Mathura VS, Laporte V, Quadros A, Paris D, Patel N, Volmar CH, Kolippakkam D, Crawford F, Mullan M. Genomic regulation after CD40 stimulation in microglia: Relevance to Alzheimer's disease. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005; 140:73-85. [PMID: 16182406 DOI: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2005] [Revised: 07/11/2005] [Accepted: 07/18/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Key pathological processes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) include the accumulation of amyloid beta peptide (Abeta) which, in excess, triggers pathological cascades including widespread inflammation, partly reflected by chronic microglial activation. It has previously been suggested that CD40/CD40L interaction promotes AD like pathology in transgenic mice. Thus, amyloid burden, gliosis and hyperphosphorylation of tau are all reduced in transgenic models of AD lacking functional CD40L. We therefore hypothesized that cellular events leading to altered APP metabolism, inflammation and increased tau phosphorylation underlying these observations would be regulated at the genomic level. In the present report, we used the Affymetrix (GeneChip) oligonucleotide microarray U133A to gain insight into the global and simultaneous transcriptomic changes in response to microglia activation after CD40/CD40L ligation. As expected, regulation of elements of the NF-kappaB signaling, chemokine and B cell signaling pathways was observed. Taken together, our data also suggest that CD40 ligation in human microglia specifically perturbs many genes associated with APP processing.
Collapse
|