Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy induces lower tissue trauma than radical retropubic prostatectomy

To compare tissue trauma between Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy and Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by inflammatory mediators. Serum samples from 40 patients submitted to RALP and 20 patients submitted to RRP were withdrawn at four different time points. The cytokines IL-4, IL-8, IL-6, IL-1B, IL-10 and TNF-α were detected using ELISA/Multiplex assays and xMAP-Luminex®. With both techniques, IL-10 and IL-6 were higher in T4 than in T1-T3 (p = 0.001). IL-10 and IL-6 were higher in T4 in open surgery than in robotic surgery (p = 0.000 and p = 0.001, respectively). Compared with both groups, IL-6 and IL-10 were higher in T4 in open surgery than in robotic surgery. Thus, we can postulate that RALP causes less tissue trauma than classical RRP, as indicated by the more limited increase in inflammatory mediators such as IL-6 and IL-10.

Digital block with or without the addition of epinephrine in the anesthetic solution

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Review of various techniques for digital blocks with local anesthetic, with or without epinephrine.

CONTENTS

Description of various procedures and comparison of results reported in the literature, mainly on latency and quality of anesthesia, details on vasoconstrictor effect of epinephrine, intraoperative bleeding, necessity of tourniquet use, duration of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, blood flow and digital SpO2 behavior, local and systemic complications, and also approaches and drugs to be used in certain situations of ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of adding epinephrine to the anesthetic solution are minor when compared to the risks of the procedure, and it seems dangerous to use a vasoconstrictor in the fingers, unless the safety of the technique and the possibility of discarding the tourniquet are definitely proven.

[Digital block with or without the addition of epinephrine in the anesthetic solution]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Review of various techniques for digital blocks with local anesthetic, with or without epinephrine.

CONTENTS

Description of various procedures and comparison of results reported in the literature, mainly on latency and quality of anesthesia, details on vasoconstrictor effect of epinephrine, intraoperative bleeding, necessity of tourniquet use, duration of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, blood flow and digital SpO2 behavior, local and systemic complications, and also approaches and drugs to be used in certain situations of ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of adding epinephrine to the anesthetic solution are minor when compared to the risks of the procedure, and it seems dangerous to use a vasoconstrictor in the fingers, unless the safety of the technique and the possibility of discarding the tourniquet are definitely proven.