1
|
Odetto D, Puga MC, Rey Valzacchi GM, Saadi JM, Zamora LB, Riggi MC, Perrotta MB. [High-risk endometrial carcinoma in early stages: Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, oncological results]. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba 2023; 80:352-366. [PMID: 38150208 PMCID: PMC10851395 DOI: 10.31053/1853.0605.v80.n4.40821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Endometrial cancer is the second most frequent gynecological tumor in Argentina, representing 6% of all cancers in women. The objective of this study is to evaluate the oncological and perioperative results in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer (HREC) limited to the uterus, treated at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, between January 2010-2018. Methods Retrospective cohort study that evaluated perioperative results, disease-free survival at 2, 4 years in patients with HREC. Results Of a total of 123 patients, 74 met the inclusion criteria. Serous tumors were the most frequent histological type, n=38 (51%), while dedifferentiated tumors were the least frequent, n=2 (3%). Of all the patients included, 56 (76%) received at least one adjuvant treatment. Taxol platinum-based chemotherapy was implemented in 28 patients (38%), while 24 (33%) received a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 2.9 years. Disease-free survival in patients with stage IA at 2 and 4 years was 71% (95% CI 55-82) and 63% (CI 46-76), respectively, while those with stage IB were 53 (95% CI 33-70) and 38 (95% CI 19-58). Regarding the surgical approach, no significant differences were found in disease-free or overall survival when comparing the laparoscopic with the laparotomy approach (p=0.06). Conclusion Only the FIGO stage showed an increased probability of death or relapse regardless of the type of adjuvant treatment and the type of surgery approach. Perioperative complications were similar in both approaches.
Collapse
|
2
|
Noll F, Odetto D, Zamora L, Saadi JM. Latin American video workshop: a new strategy to learn surgery in gynecology oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:1655. [PMID: 37247939 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Florencia Noll
- Gynecologic oncology, Sanatorio Allende, Cordoba, Argentina
| | - Diego Odetto
- Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Liliana Zamora
- Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jose Martin Saadi
- Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bizzarri N, Querleu D, Dostálek L, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Giannarelli D, Lopez A, Salehi S, Ayhan A, Kim SH, Ortiz DI, Klat J, Landoni F, Pareja R, Manchanda R, Kosťun J, Ramirez PT, Meydanli MM, Odetto D, Laky R, Zapardiel I, Weinberger V, Dos Reis R, Pedone Anchora L, Amaro K, Akilli H, Abu-Rustum NR, Salcedo-Hernández RA, Javůrková V, Mom CH, Scambia G, Falconer H, Cibula D. Survival associated with extent of radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a subanalysis of the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 229:428.e1-428.e12. [PMID: 37336255 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International guidelines recommend tailoring the radicality of hysterectomy according to the known preoperative tumor characteristics in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess whether increased radicality had an effect on 5-year disease-free survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy. The secondary aims were 5-year overall survival and pattern of recurrence. STUDY DESIGN This was an international, multicenter, retrospective study from the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative cohort. Patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IB1 and IIA1 who underwent open type B/C1/C2 radical hysterectomy according to Querleu-Morrow classification between January 2007 and December 2016, who did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy and who had negative lymph nodes and free surgical margins at final histology, were included. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed. Patients were stratified according to pathologic tumor diameter. Propensity score match analysis was performed to balance baseline characteristics in patients undergoing nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. RESULTS A total of 1257 patients were included. Of note, 883 patients (70.2%) underwent nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy, and 374 patients (29.8%) underwent non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Baseline differences between the study groups were found for tumor stage and diameter (higher use of non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for tumors >2 cm or with vaginal involvement; P<.0001). The use of adjuvant therapy in patients undergoing nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 27.3% vs 28.6%, respectively (P=.63). Five-year disease-free survival in patients undergoing nerve-sparing vs non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 90.1% (95% confidence interval, 87.9-92.2) vs 93.8% (95% confidence interval, 91.1-96.5), respectively (P=.047). Non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was independently associated with better disease-free survival at multivariable analysis performed on the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.81; P=.004). Furthermore, 5-year overall survival in patients undergoing nerve-sparing vs non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 95.7% (95% confidence interval, 94.1-97.2) vs non-nerve-sparing 96.5% (95% confidence interval, 94.3-98.7), respectively (P=.78). In patients with a tumor diameter ≤20 mm, 5-year disease-free survival was 94.7% in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs 96.2% in non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (P=.22). In patients with tumors between 21 and 40 mm, 5-year disease-free survival was 90.3% in non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs 83.1% in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (P=.016) (no significant difference in the rate of adjuvant treatment in this subgroup, P=.47). This was confirmed after propensity match score analysis (balancing the 2 study groups). The pattern of recurrence in the propensity-matched population did not demonstrate any difference (P=.70). CONCLUSION For tumors ≤20 mm, no survival difference was found with more radical hysterectomy. For tumors between 21 and 40 mm, a more radical hysterectomy was associated with improved 5-year disease-free survival. No difference in the pattern of recurrence according to the extent of radicality was observed. Non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was associated with better 5-year disease-free survival than nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy after propensity score match analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Bizzarri
- Unità Operativa Complessa Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Denis Querleu
- Unità Operativa Complessa Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Lukáš Dostálek
- First Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Lopez
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Sahar Salehi
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sarah H Kim
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David Isla Ortiz
- Gynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Jaroslav Klat
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Fabio Landoni
- IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo - Università Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Rene Pareja
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, and Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Department of Health Services Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Kosťun
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Mehmet M Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Diego Odetto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rene Laky
- Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vit Weinberger
- Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Ricardo Dos Reis
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luigi Pedone Anchora
- Unità Operativa Complessa Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Karina Amaro
- Oncology Unit, Cayetano Heredia Hospital, Lima, Peru
| | - Huseyin Akilli
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Veronika Javůrková
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Unità Operativa Complessa Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Cibula
- First Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group), Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rey Valzacchi GM, Odetto D, Saadi JM, Zamora LB, Loza C, Medina M, Perrotta MB. Conservative treatment of cervical cancer: A single center experience over a two-decade period. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2023; 48:101226. [PMID: 37362246 PMCID: PMC10285536 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To report the surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes of the different surgical techniques used for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed all fertility-sparing procedures performed between 2004 and 2020. The study included patients desiring to preserve fertility who had squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma histology, all grades, and FIGO 2009 stage IA2-IB1 tumors. Results 48 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eight patients (16.7%) had stage IA2, and 40 (83.3%) had stage IB1 tumors. Conization with pelvic lymph node assessment was performed in 5 (10.4%) patients, an open radical trachelectomy in 21 (43.8%), and a laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in 22 (45.8%). No major intraoperative complications were registered. Two patients required surgery due to an early postoperative complication. Late postoperative complications were seen in 15 patients (31.2%), with cervical stenosis being the most frequent (60%). The rate of DFS at 2 and 5 years was 89% (95% CI, 76-95%), and the 5- year OS was 96% (95% CI, 83-98%). Univariate analysis demonstrated a relationship between tumor size and recurrence, but not for other prognostic tumor factors or surgical approach. One patient (4.8%) developed recurrent disease in the open radical trachelectomy group, and five (22.7%) in the laparoscopic radical trachelectomy group. The pregnancy rate was 41.4%, and the live birth rate 88.2%. Conclusion Fertility-sparing treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer is ever-evolving. This study adds information to the literature about the outcomes of these quite uncommon procedures, and allows a critical analysis of many of the topics which are under discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido M. Rey Valzacchi
- Corresponding author at: Department of Gynecology, Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Potosi 4135, Zip Code 1199, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cibula D, Akilli H, Jarkovsky J, van Lonkhuijzen L, Scambia G, Meydanli MM, Ortiz DI, Falconer H, Abu-Rustum NR, Odetto D, Klát J, Dos Reis R, Zapardiel I, Di Martino G, Presl J, Laky R, López A, Weinberger V, Obermair A, Pareja R, Poncová R, Mom C, Bizzarri N, Borčinová M, Aslan K, Salcedo Hernandez RA, Fons G, Benešová K, Dostálek L, Ayhan A. Role of adjuvant therapy in intermediate-risk cervical cancer patients - Subanalyses of the SCCAN study. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 170:195-202. [PMID: 36706646 PMCID: PMC10281542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The "intermediate-risk" (IR) group of early-stage cervical cancer patients is characterized by negative pelvic lymph nodes and a combination of tumor-related prognostic risk factors such as tumor size ≥2 cm, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and deep stromal invasion. However, the role of adjuvant treatment in these patients remains controversial. We investigated whether adjuvant (chemo)radiation is associated with a survival benefit after radical surgery in patients with IR cervical cancer. METHODS We analyzed data from patients with IR cervical cancer (tumor size 2-4 cm plus LVSI OR tumor size >4 cm; N0; no parametrial invasion; clear surgical margins) who underwent primary curative-intent surgery between 2007 and 2016 and were retrospectively registered in the international multicenter Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) study. RESULTS Of 692 analyzed patients, 274 (39.6%) received no adjuvant treatment (AT-) and 418 (60.4%) received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (AT+). The 5-year disease-free survival (83.2% and 80.3%; PDFS = 0.365) and overall survival (88.7% and 89.0%; POS = 0.281) were not significantly different between the AT- and AT+ groups, respectively. Adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not associated with a survival benefit after adjusting for confounding factors by case-control propensity score matching or in subgroup analyses of patients with tumor size ≥4 cm and <4 cm. In univariable analysis, adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not identified as a prognostic factor in any of the subgroups (full cohort: PDFS = 0.365; POS = 0.282). CONCLUSION Among patients with IR early-stage cervical cancer, radical surgery alone achieved equal disease-free and overall survival rates to those achieved by combining radical surgery with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Huseyin Akilli
- Baskent University School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Luc van Lonkhuijzen
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - David Isla Ortiz
- Gynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Mexico
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Diego Odetto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jaroslav Klát
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Ricardo Dos Reis
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giampaolo Di Martino
- Gynaecologic Surgical Unit, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital,University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Jiri Presl
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Rene Laky
- Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Aldo López
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Vit Weinberger
- University Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Andreas Obermair
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer; The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Rene Pareja
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Renata Poncová
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Constantijne Mom
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Borčinová
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Koray Aslan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Guus Fons
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Klára Benešová
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lukáš Dostálek
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Baskent University School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Odetto D, Valzacchi GMR, Ostojich M, Alessandria S, Darin MC, Tapper K, Rita Amato A, Luis Bianchi F, Lopresti EF, Cabrera LS, Costa J, Esteban A, Prozzillo L, Escobar H, Bustos DG, Rosato OD, Picciochi RA, Garrido RM, de Degani GL, Vitale MSDV, Navarini RH, Isnardi F, Franco G, Rossini M, Carrizo MM, Perrotta M, Crimi G. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high risk endometrial cancer: A multi-center study performed in Argentina. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2023; 46:101147. [PMID: 36860590 PMCID: PMC9969288 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Compare the perioperative outcomes and disease-free survival between minimally invasive and open surgery in women with stage I-II high-risk endometrial cancer. Methods A retrospective, cohort study was performed involving twenty-four centers from Argentina. Patients with grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, undifferentiated carcinoma or carcinosarcoma who underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and staging between January 2010-2018 were included. Cox hazard regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated the association of surgical technique with survival. Results Of 343 eligible patients, 214 (62 %) underwent open surgery and 129 (38 %) underwent laparoscopic surgery. No significant differences were seen between the two groups with respect to greater or equal grade III Clavien-Dindo postoperative complications (11 % in the open surgery group vs 9 % minimally invasive surgery group; P = 0.34) Minimally invasive surgery was not associated with worse disease-free survival at four years (79.14 % [95 % CI 69.42- 86.08] vs 78.80 % [95 % CI 70.61-84.96]), (p = 0.25), even after creating a Cox proportional model (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08 95 % CI 0.63-1.84); (p = 0.76). Conclusion There was no difference between postoperative complications nor oncologic outcomes comparing minimally invasive and open surgery among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Odetto
- Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina,Corresponding author.
| | | | - Marcela Ostojich
- Department of Gynecology, Institute of Oncology Angel H. Roffo, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Sebastian Alessandria
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sanatorio Sagrado Corazón, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Maria Cecilia Darin
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Karen Tapper
- Center for Medical Education and Clinical Investigation (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alicia Rita Amato
- Department of Gynecology, Complejo Médico Policial “Churruca-Visca”, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | - Jerónimo Costa
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Privado de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Agustín Esteban
- Department of Gynecology, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba, Argentina
| | | | - Horacio Escobar
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Italiano Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | | | - Otilio Daniel Rosato
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Maternidad y Neonatología de la Ciudad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | | | - Rosa María Garrido
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Marie Curie, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | - Facundo Isnardi
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Italiano Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Gonzalo Franco
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Nacional de Clínicas, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Mariano Rossini
- Department of Gynecology, Clínica del Niño y la Familia, Mar del Plata, Argentina
| | | | - Myriam Perrotta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gabriel Crimi
- Center for Medical Education and Clinical Investigation (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bizzarri N, Dostálek L, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Giannarelli D, Lopez A, Falconer H, Querleu D, Ayhan A, Kim SH, Ortiz DI, Klat J, Landoni F, Rodriguez J, Manchanda R, Kosťun J, Ramirez PT, Meydanli MM, Odetto D, Laky R, Zapardiel I, Weinberger V, Reis RD, Anchora LP, Amaro K, Salehi S, Akilli H, Abu-Rustum NR, Salcedo-Hernández RA, Javůrková V, Mom CH, Scambia G, Cibula D. Association of Hospital Surgical Volume With Survival in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Treated With Radical Hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:207-214. [PMID: 36701621 PMCID: PMC10445691 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of number of radical hysterectomies performed per year in each center with disease-free survival and overall survival. METHODS We conducted an international, multicenter, retrospective study of patients previously included in the Surveillance in Cervical Cancer collaborative studies. Individuals with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB1-IIA1 cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and had negative lymph nodes at final histology were included. Patients were treated at referral centers for gynecologic oncology according to updated national and international guidelines. Optimal cutoffs for surgical volume were identified using an unadjusted Cox proportional hazard model, with disease-free survival as the outcome and defined as the value that minimizes the P-value of the split in groups in terms of disease-free survival. Propensity score matching was used to create statistically similar cohorts at baseline. RESULTS A total of 2,157 patients were initially included. The two most significant cutoffs for surgical volume were identified at seven and 17 surgical procedures, dividing the entire cohort into low-volume, middle-volume, and high-volume centers. After propensity score matching, 1,238 patients were analyzed-619 (50.0%) in the high-volume group, 523 (42.2%) in the middle-volume group, and 96 (7.8%) in the low-volume group. Patients who underwent surgery in higher-volume institutions had progressively better 5-year disease-free survival than those who underwent surgery in lower-volume centers (92.3% vs 88.9% vs 83.8%, P=.029). No difference was noted in 5-year overall survival (95.9% vs 97.2% vs 95.2%, P=.70). Cox multivariable regression analysis showed that FIGO stage greater than IB1, presence of lymphovascular space invasion, grade greater than 1, tumor diameter greater than 20 mm, minimally invasive surgical approach, nonsquamous cell carcinoma histology, and lower-volume centers represented independent risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSION Surgical volume of centers represented an independent prognostic factor affecting disease-free survival. Increasing number of radical hysterectomies performed in each center every year was associated with improved disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Lukáš Dostálek
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Lopez
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Denis Querleu
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Baskent University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sarah H Kim
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - David Isla Ortiz
- Gynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Jaroslav Klat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Fabio Landoni
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynaecologic Oncology Surgical Unit, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Juliana Rodriguez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, & Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jan Kosťun
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mehmet M Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Diego Odetto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rene Laky
- Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vit Weinberger
- University Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Czech
| | - Ricardo Dos Reis
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luigi Pedone Anchora
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Karina Amaro
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Sahar Salehi
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Huseyin Akilli
- Baskent University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Veronika Javůrková
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dostálek L, Benešová K, Klát J, Kim SH, Falconer H, Kostun J, Dos Reis R, Zapardiel I, Landoni F, Ortiz DI, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Lopez A, Odetto D, Borčinová M, Jarkovsky J, Salehi S, Němejcová K, Bajsová S, Park KJ, Javůrková V, Abu-Rustum NR, Dundr P, Cibula D. Stratification of lymph node metastases as macrometastases, micrometastases, or isolated tumor cells has no clinical implication in patients with cervical cancer: Subgroup analysis of the SCCAN project. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 168:151-156. [PMID: 36442426 PMCID: PMC10413820 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In cervical cancer, presence of lymph-node macrometastases (MAC) is a major prognostic factor and an indication for adjuvant treatment. However, since clinical impact of micrometastases (MIC) and isolated tumor-cells (ITC) remains controversial, we sought to identify a cut-off value for the metastasis size not associated with negative prognosis. METHODS We analyzed data from 967 cervical cancer patients (T1a1L1-T2b) registered in the SCCAN (Surveillance in Cervical CANcer) database, who underwent primary surgical treatment, including sentinel lymph-node (SLN) biopsy with pathological ultrastaging. The size of SLN metastasis was considered a continuous variable and multiple testing was performed for cut-off values of 0.01-1.0 mm. Disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between N0 and subgroups of N1 patients defined by cut-off ranges. RESULTS LN metastases were found in 172 (18%) patients, classified as MAC, MIC, and ITC in 79, 54, and 39 patients, respectively. DFS was shorter in patients with MAC (HR 2.20, P = 0.003) and MIC (HR 2.87, P < 0.001), while not differing between MAC/MIC (P = 0.484). DFS in the ITC subgroup was neither different from N0 (P = 0.127) nor from MIC/MAC subgroups (P = 0.449). Cut-off analysis revealed significantly shorter DFS compared to N0 in all subgroups with metastases ≥0.4 mm (HR 2.311, P = 0.04). The significance of metastases <0.4 mm could not be assessed due to limited statistical power (<80%). We did not identify any cut-off for the size of metastasis with significantly better prognosis than the rest of N1 group. CONCLUSIONS In cervical cancer patients, the presence of LN metastases ≥0.4 mm was associated with a significant negative impact on DFS and no cut-off value for the size of metastasis with better prognosis than N1 was found. Traditional metastasis stratification based on size has no clinical implication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukáš Dostálek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Teaching Hospital and The First Faculty of Medicine of Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Klára Benešová
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jaroslav Klát
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Sarah H Kim
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Kostun
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ricardo Dos Reis
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynaecologic Oncology Surgical Unit, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - David Isla Ortiz
- Gynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center-Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Aldo Lopez
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Diego Odetto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martina Borčinová
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Teaching Hospital and The First Faculty of Medicine of Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Sahar Salehi
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristýna Němejcová
- Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Sylva Bajsová
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Kay J Park
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Veronika Javůrková
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Pavel Dundr
- Department of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Teaching Hospital and The First Faculty of Medicine of Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Naessens Aspiazu AS, Vassolo R, Márquez AA, Brown JP, Vietri GO, Odetto D. [Single-center cohort study of perioperative outcomes on total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): a 10-year experience]. Medicina (B Aires) 2023; 83:727-736. [PMID: 37870330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The removal of the uterus, (hysterectomy), is the most frequent surgery in gynecology. In Argentina there are few publications on the perioperative results of this type of procedure, and even less on minimally invasive hysterectomy. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of perioperative complications in patients with total laparoscopic hysterectomy performed at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, from January 7, 2010 to December 22, 2020. METHODS retrospective cohort study where electronic medical records were reviewed. Intrasurgical and postoperative complications were evaluated using the validated Clavien-Dindo's classification. RESULTS 1014 patients were included. The rate of intra-surgical complications was 4.5%. In respect to postoperative complications, there was found a rate of 16.6% (n=168), being 12.3% (n=125) Clavien-Dindo = 2, and 4.2% (n=43) Clavien-Dindo = 3. In a multivariable analysis that adjusted for uterine weight > 170g, age, body mass index, and more than two previous abdominal surgeries, an association was found between uterine weight >170g and postoperative complications OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04- 2.14, p=0.03. DISCUSSION When evaluating the percentage of minor and major complications, our findings are within the acceptable parameters for performing this type of surgery, even though the evaluation was carried out in an educational setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Renata Vassolo
- Servicio de Ginecología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Agustina A Márquez
- Servicio de Ginecología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Justina P Brown
- Servicio de Ginecología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Guido O Vietri
- Servicio de Ginecología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Diego Odetto
- Sección Ginecología Oncológica, Servicio de Ginecología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cibula D, Dostálek L, Jarkovsky J, Mom CH, Lopez A, Falconer H, Scambia G, Ayhan A, Kim SH, Ortiz DI, Klat J, Obermair A, Di Martino G, Pareja R, Manchanda R, Kosťun J, dos Reis R, Meydanli MM, Odetto D, Laky R, Zapardiel I, Weinberger V, Benešová K, Borčinová M, Cardenas F, Wallin E, Anchora LP, Akilli H, Abu-Rustum NR, Muñoz SAB, Javůrková V, Fischerová D, van Lonkhuijzen LR. Post-recurrence survival in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 164:362-369. [PMID: 34955236 PMCID: PMC9406127 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 26% of patients with early-stage cervical cancer experience relapse after primary surgery. However, little is known about which factors influence prognosis following disease recurrence. Therefore, our aims were to determine post-recurrence disease-specific survival (PR-DSS) and to identify respective prognostic factors for PR-DSS. METHODS Data from 528 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who relapsed after primary surgery performed between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the SCANN study (Surveillance in Cervical CANcer). Factors related to the primary disease and recurrence were combined in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to predict PR-DSS. RESULTS The 5-year PR-DSS was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.7%-44.5%), median disease-free interval between primary surgery and recurrence (DFI1) was 1.5 years, and median survival after recurrence was 2.5 years. Six significant variables were identified in the multivariable analysis and were used to construct the prognostic model. Two were related to primary treatment (largest tumour size and lymphovascular space invasion) and four to recurrence (DFI1, age at recurrence, presence of symptoms, and recurrence type). The C-statistic after 10-fold cross-validation of prognostic model reached 0.701 (95% CI 0.675-0.727). Three risk-groups with significantly differing prognoses were identified, with 5-year PR-DSS rates of 81.8%, 44.6%, and 12.7%. CONCLUSIONS We developed the robust model of PR-DSS to stratify patients with relapsed cervical cancer according to risk profiles using six routinely recorded prognostic markers. The model can be utilised in clinical practice to aid decision-making on the strategy of recurrence management, and to better inform the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic,Corresponding author: David Cibula, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Charles University and General University Hospital, Apolinarska 18, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic. Tel.: +420224967451.
| | - Lukáš Dostálek
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Constantijne H. Mom
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aldo Lopez
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Baskent University School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - David Isla Ortiz
- Gynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Mexico
| | - Jaroslav Klat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Andreas Obermair
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer; The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Giampaolo Di Martino
- I University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynaecologic Oncology Surgical Unit, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Rene Pareja
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, & Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jan Kosťun
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ricardo dos Reis
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Diego Odetto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rene Laky
- Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vit Weinberger
- University Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University
| | - Klára Benešová
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Borčinová
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Fernando Cardenas
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Emelie Wallin
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Luigi Pedone Anchora
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Huseyin Akilli
- Baskent University School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Veronika Javůrková
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Daniela Fischerová
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luc R.C.W. van Lonkhuijzen
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cibula D, Dostálek L, Jarkovsky J, Mom CH, Lopez A, Falconer H, Fagotti A, Ayhan A, Kim SH, Isla Ortiz D, Klat J, Obermair A, Landoni F, Rodriguez J, Manchanda R, Kosťun J, Dos Reis R, Meydanli MM, Odetto D, Laky R, Zapardiel I, Weinberger V, Benešová K, Borčinová M, Pari D, Salehi S, Bizzarri N, Akilli H, Abu-Rustum NR, Salcedo-Hernández RA, Javůrková V, Sláma J, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW. The annual recurrence risk model for tailored surveillance strategy in patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer 2021; 158:111-122. [PMID: 34666213 PMCID: PMC9406128 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current guidelines for surveillance strategy in cervical cancer are rigid, recommending the same strategy for all survivors. The aim of this study was to develop a robust model allowing for individualised surveillance based on a patient's risk profile. METHODS Data of 4343 early-stage patients with cervical cancer treated between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the international SCCAN (Surveillance in Cervical Cancer) consortium. The Cox proportional hazards model predicting disease-free survival (DFS) was developed and internally validated. The risk score, derived from regression coefficients of the model, stratified the cohort into significantly distinctive risk groups. On its basis, the annual recurrence risk model (ARRM) was calculated. RESULTS Five variables were included in the prognostic model: maximal pathologic tumour diameter; tumour histotype; grade; number of positive pelvic lymph nodes; and lymphovascular space invasion. Five risk groups significantly differing in prognosis were identified with a five-year DFS of 97.5%, 94.7%, 85.2% and 63.3% in increasing risk groups, whereas a two-year DFS in the highest risk group equalled 15.4%. Based on the ARRM, the annual recurrence risk in the lowest risk group was below 1% since the beginning of follow-up and declined below 1% at years three, four and >5 in the medium-risk groups. In the whole cohort, 26% of recurrences appeared at the first year of the follow-up, 48% by year two and 78% by year five. CONCLUSION The ARRM represents a potent tool for tailoring the surveillance strategy in early-stage patients with cervical cancer based on the patient's risk status and respective annual recurrence risk. It can easily be used in routine clinical settings internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Lukáš Dostálek
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | - Aldo Lopez
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Baskent University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - David Isla Ortiz
- Gynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Mexico
| | - Jaroslav Klat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Andreas Obermair
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Fabio Landoni
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynaecologic Oncology Surgical Unit, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Juliana Rodriguez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, & Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jan Kosťun
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ricardo Dos Reis
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mehmet M Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Diego Odetto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rene Laky
- Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vit Weinberger
- University Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Czech Republic
| | - Klára Benešová
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Martina Borčinová
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Darwin Pari
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Sahar Salehi
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Huseyin Akilli
- Baskent University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Veronika Javůrková
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Jiří Sláma
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Odetto D, Saadi JM, Chacon CB, Wernicke A, Ribeiro R. Uterine transposition after radical trachelectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1374-1379. [PMID: 34607821 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Odetto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jose Martin Saadi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Alejandra Wernicke
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Reitan Ribeiro
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Saadi JM, Perrotta M, Bolaño L, Odetto D, Cortez JPS, Noll F. Primary vaginal sarcoma treated with upfront fertility-sparing surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:490-491. [PMID: 33649019 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Martin Saadi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Ciudad Autonoma, Argentina
| | - Myriam Perrotta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Ciudad Autonoma, Argentina
| | - Lucrecia Bolaño
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Ciudad Autonoma, Argentina
| | - Diego Odetto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Ciudad Autonoma, Argentina
| | - Juan Pablo Segundo Cortez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Ciudad Autonoma, Argentina
| | - Florencia Noll
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Ciudad Autonoma, Argentina .,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sanatorio Allende Cerro, Cordoba, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rodriguez J, Rauh-Hain JA, Saenz J, Isla DO, Rendon Pereira GJ, Odetto D, Martinelli F, Villoslada V, Zapardiel I, Trujillo LM, Perez M, Hernandez M, Saadi JM, Raspagliesi F, Valdivia H, Siegrist J, Fu S, Hernandez Nava M, Echeverry L, Noll F, Ditto A, Lopez A, Hernandez A, Pareja R. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:504-511. [PMID: 33504547 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent evidence has shown adverse oncological outcomes when minimally invasive surgery is used in early-stage cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to compare disease-free survival in patients that had undergone radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, either by laparoscopy or laparotomy. METHODS We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients with cervical cancer stage IA1 with lymph-vascular invasion, IA2, and IB1 (FIGO 2009 classification), between January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2017, at seven cancer centers from six countries. We included squamous, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous histologies. We used an inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity score to construct a weighted cohort of women, including predictor variables selected a priori with the possibility of confounding the relationship between the surgical approach and survival. We estimated the HR for all-cause mortality after radical hysterectomy with weighted Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS A total of 1379 patients were included in the final analysis, with 681 (49.4%) operated by laparoscopy and 698 (50.6%) by laparotomy. There were no differences regarding the surgical approach in the rates of positive vaginal margins, deep stromal invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion. Median follow-up was 52.1 months (range, 0.8-201.2) in the laparoscopic group and 52.6 months (range, 0.4-166.6) in the laparotomy group. Women who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy had a lower rate of disease-free survival compared with the laparotomy group (4-year rate, 88.7% vs 93.0%; HR for recurrence or death from cervical cancer 1.64; 95% CI 1.09-2.46; P=0.02). In sensitivity analyzes, after adjustment for adjuvant treatment, radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy compared with laparotomy was associated with increased hazards of recurrence or death from cervical cancer (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.57; P=0.01) and death for any cause (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.05-4.37; P=0.03). CONCLUSION In this retrospective multicenter study, laparoscopy was associated with worse disease-free survival, compared to laparotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Rodriguez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine and Health Services Research, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - James Saenz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia
| | - David Ortiz Isla
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Diego Odetto
- Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Vladimir Villoslada
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (INEN), Lima, Peru
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit. La Paz University Hospital, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lina Maria Trujillo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Milagros Perez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Marcela Hernandez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto de Cancerologia Las Américas, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Jose Martin Saadi
- Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Henry Valdivia
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (INEN), Lima, Peru
| | - Jaime Siegrist
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit. La Paz University Hospital, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Shuangshuang Fu
- Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine and Health Services Research, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mindy Hernandez Nava
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Lina Echeverry
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto de Cancerologia Las Américas, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Florencia Noll
- Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Antonino Ditto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Aldo Lopez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (INEN), Lima, Peru
| | - Alicia Hernandez
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit. La Paz University Hospital, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rene Pareja
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia .,Gynecologic Oncology, Clinica Astorga, Professor Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Odetto D, Cortez JP, Saadi JM, Zamora LB, Riggi MC, Lamm M, Perrotta MB. [Treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian tumor. Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires experience]. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 81:565-573. [PMID: 34453798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer represents the third gynecological cancer in frequency in Argentina. There is a lack of information on this pathology in our country regarding the treatment and evolution of patients who suffer it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative and oncological results in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian tumor. We present a retrospective cohort in which we evaluated disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with epithelial ovarian tumor treated at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires between June 2009 and June 2017. Of 170 patients included in the study, 72 (42.4%) received primary debulking surgery (CCP), while 98 (57.6%) received neoadjuvant therapy and interval surgery (CI). The optimal cyto-reduction rate was 75% and 79% respectively. No differences were found in perioperative outcomes, or in severe complications between the two groups. The median disease-free survival in the CCP group was 2.5 years (95% CI 1.6-3.1) while in the CI group it was 1.4 (95% CI 1.2-1.7) p < 0.001. The median overall survival was 5.8 years in CPP, and 3.5 years in CI. Faced with a meticulous selection by a group of experts, patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with CCP present better oncological results than those who received neoadjuvant therapy and CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Odetto
- Sección Ginecología Oncológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail:
| | - Juan P Cortez
- Sección Ginecología Oncológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - José M Saadi
- Sección Ginecología Oncológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Liliana B Zamora
- Sección Ginecología Oncológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María C Riggi
- Sección Ginecología Oncológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Marina Lamm
- Sección Ginecología Oncológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Myriam B Perrotta
- Sección Ginecología Oncológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Salvo G, Odetto D, Saenz Perrotta C, Noll F, Perrotta M, Pareja R, Wernicke A, Ramirez PT. Tumor size in cervical cancer: an ongoing dilemma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1851. [PMID: 32958541 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Salvo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Diego Odetto
- Ginecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Caty Saenz Perrotta
- Servicio de Patologia, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Federal District, Argentina
| | - Florencia Noll
- Ginecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Myriam Perrotta
- Ginecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rene Pareja
- Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Clinica ASTORGA, Medellin, and Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Alejandra Wernicke
- Pathology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Federal District, Argentina
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Perrotta M, Noll F, Cortez JPS, Bolaño L, Saadi JM, Odetto D. Simple trachelectomy with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in a pregnant woman with a FIGO stage IA2 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1652-1653. [PMID: 32895313 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam Perrotta
- Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Florencia Noll
- Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Lucrecia Bolaño
- Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jose Martin Saadi
- Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Diego Odetto
- Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Odetto D, Perrotta M, Saadi JM, Chacon CB, Causa Andrieu PI, Wernicke A, Saez Perrotta MC. Infection versus cancer: management of actinomyces mimicking cervical cancer or ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1638-1643. [PMID: 32753563 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Odetto
- Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Myriam Perrotta
- Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jose Martin Saadi
- Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Pamela Ines Causa Andrieu
- Radiology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alejandra Wernicke
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Salvo G, Odetto D, Pareja R, Frumovitz M, Ramirez PT. Revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging: A review of gaps and questions that remain. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:873-878. [PMID: 32241876 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer was published. In this most recent classification, imaging modalities and pathologic information have been added as tools to determine the final stage of the disease. Although there are many merits to this new staging for cervical cancer, including more detailed categorization of early-stage disease as well as information on nodal distribution, the classification falls short in clarifying areas of controversy in the staging system. Many unanswered questions remain and, as such, a number of gaps lead to further debate in the interpretation of relevant clinical data. Factors such as measurement of tumor size, definition of parametrial involvement, ovarian metastases, lower uterine segment extension, lymph node metastasis, and imaging modalities are explored in this review. The goal is to focus on items that deserve further discussion and clarification in the most recent FIGO staging for cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Salvo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Diego Odetto
- Gynecology Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rene Pareja
- Gynecologic Oncology, Clinica ASTORGA, Medellin, and Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Odetto D, Puga MC, Saadi J, Noll F, Perrotta M. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina). Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 29:863-868. [PMID: 31155517 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Revised: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial demonstrated a higher rate of disease recurrence and worse disease-free survival in patients who underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. OBJECTIVES To evaluate surgical and oncological outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy performed at Hospital Italiano in Buenos Aires, Argentina. METHODS This retrospective study included all patients with cervical cancer, 2009 FIGO stage IA1, with lymphovascular invasion to IB1 (<4 cm) who underwent a laparoscopic radical hysterectomy between June 2010 and June 2015. Patients were eligible if they had squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma, and no lymph node involvement by imaging. Patients must have undergone a type C1 radical hysterectomy. Only patients who were treated by a laparoscopic approach were included. Patients were excluded if histopathology showed a component of neuroendocrine carcinoma before or after surgery; if they had synchronous primary tumors, history of abdominal or pelvic radiotherapy, or were operated on at an outside institution; and if they had only surgery and no follow-up in our institution. Relapse rate and disease-free survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 108 patients were evaluated. The median age was 41 years (range 27-70). Distribution of histologic sub-types was squamous carcinoma in 77 patients (71%), adenocarcinoma in 27 patients (25%), and adenosquamous carcinoma in four patients (4%). Ninety-nine patients (92%) had stage IB1 tumors and 58 (54%) patients had tumors ≤2 cm. The median surgical time was 240 min (range 190-290), the median estimated blood loss was 140 mL (range 50-500) and the transfusion rate was 3.7%. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-11). The median follow-up time was 39 months (range 11-83). The global recurrence rate after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was 15% (16/108). According to tumor size, the recurrence rate was 12% in patients with tumors ≤2 cm (7/58) and 18% in patients with tumors >2 cm (9/50) (OR=0.76; 95% CI 0.26 to 2.22; p=0.62) The 3- and 5-year relapse rate was 17% (95% CI 11% to 27%). The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was 81% (95% CI 71% to 88%) and 70% (95% CI 43% to 86%), respectively. Overall survival at 3 years was 87% (95% CI 76% to 93%). CONCLUSION The recurrence rate after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was 15%, and in tumors ≤2 cm it was 12%. The 3-year disease-free survival was 81%. Given these results our hospital has changed the approach to open radical hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Odetto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Maria Celeste Puga
- Department of Clinical Investigation, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jose Saadi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Florencia Noll
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Myriam Perrotta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Vazquez FJ, Korin J, Baldessari EM, Capparelli FJ, Gutierrez P, Pale C, Bocanegra F, Grand B, Penchasky D, Gonzalez Alcántara MM, Prémoli MS, Tabares A, Wainsztein N, Odetto D, Vaccaro C, Martínez Aquino E, Cumpian O, Falabella V, Antuel García S, Saadi J, Siccardi M, Gándara E. [Recommendations for the use of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Argentina]. Medicina (B Aires) 2020; 80 Suppl 3:65-66. [PMID: 32658849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Although the incidence is uncertain, some case reports suggest that COVID 19 infection is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We suggest starting prophylactic anticoagulant therapy for all patients hospitalized with a symptomatic infection with COVID-19, unless contraindicated, with enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily if creatinine clearance is greater than 30 ml/min.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando J Vazquez
- Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jorge Korin
- Hematología, Sanatorio Los Arcos, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Paula Gutierrez
- Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Carlos Pale
- Clínica Médica, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Argentina
| | - Florencia Bocanegra
- Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Mendoza, Provincia de Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Beatriz Grand
- Departamento Materno Infantil, Hospital Juan A. Fernández, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Diana Penchasky
- Sección Hematología, Servicio de Clínica Médica del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Aldo Tabares
- Servicio de Medicina Vascular y Trombosis, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Provincia de Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Néstor Wainsztein
- Medicina Interna y Terapia Intensiva, Instituto FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Diego Odetto
- Sección de Oncología Ginecológica, Servicio de Ginecología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Carlos Vaccaro
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Olga Cumpian
- Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Español de Mendoza, Provincia de Mendoza, Argentina
| | | | - Santiago Antuel García
- Hematología y Hemoterapia, Clínica 25 de Mayo, Mar del Plata, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - José Saadi
- Servicio de Ginecología, Sección Oncológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Esteban Gándara
- Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Privado de la Comunidad, Mar del Plata, Argentina. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vazquez FJ, Korin J, Baldessari EM, Capparelli FJ, Gutierrez P, Pale C, Bocanegra F, Grand B, Vilaseca A, Penchasky D, González Alcantara MM, Prémoli MS, Tabares A, Wainsztein N, Odetto D, Vaccaro C, Martínez Aquino E, Cumpian O, Falabella V, García SA, Saadi J, Siccardi M, Gandara E. [Updated recommendations for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis in Argentina]. Medicina (B Aires) 2020; 80:69-80. [PMID: 32044743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) in hospitalized adults has high morbidity and mortality, is the origin of chronic complications and increased cost for the health system. Since the publication of recommendations for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients in 2013, new alternatives and strategies have emerged, which motivated us to update our recommendations. Although there are different consensus and clinical practice guidelines, adherence to them is suboptimal. The different therapeutic alternatives for hospitalized adult patients (non-surgical, surgical non-orthopedic, with and without cancer, orthopedic an d pregnant) have been updated, paying particular attention to the drugs available in Argentina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando J Vazquez
- Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail:
| | - Jorge Korin
- Hematología, Sanatorio Los Arcos, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Paula Gutierrez
- Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Carlos Pale
- Clínica Médica, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Argentina
| | | | - Beatriz Grand
- Departamento Materno Infantil, Hospital Juan A. Fernández, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Diana Penchasky
- Sección Hematología, Servicio de Clínica Médica del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Aldo Tabares
- Servicio de Medicina Vascular y Trombosis, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Néstor Wainsztein
- Medicina Interna y Terapia Intensiva, Instituto FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Diego Odetto
- Sección de Oncología Ginecológica, Servicio de Ginecología del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Carlos Vaccaro
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Olga Cumpian
- Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Español de Mendoza, Argentina
| | | | | | - José Saadi
- Servicio de Ginecología sección Oncológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Esteban Gandara
- Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Privado de la Comunidad, Mar del Plata, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rey Valzacchi GM, Odetto D, Chacon CB, Wernicke A, Xiang Y. Placental site trophoblastic disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 30:144-149. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
A case study of a 38-year-old woman with a diagnosis of placental site trophoblastic tumor is presented. The patient had a 22-month history of amenorrhea since her last pregnancy, and a dilation and curettage procedure was performed after a 3.1×2.4×2.8 cm endometrial echogenic lesion was visualized on a pelvic ultrasound. When the diagnosis of placental site trophoblastic tumor was made by histopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis, complementary examinations including including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a chest computed tomography (CT) were done. There was no evidence of disease outside the uterus, and a laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy was performed. After a surveillance period of 12 months, no disease recurrence was identified. Best imaging studies, treatment options, and proper surveillance for these type of tumors are discussed alongside the case study.
Collapse
|
24
|
Saraniti G, Odetto D, Maria Eugenia G, Saadi J, Orti R, Perrotta M. Laparoscopic Cytoreduction for Isolated Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Recurrence in Gynecologic Malignancies: Experience of Hospital Italiano of Buenos Aires, Argentina. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
25
|
Saadi J, Perrotta M, Giavedoni M, Odetto D, Saraniti G, Testa R. Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy: Technique, Feasibility and Outcomes. Experience Hospital Italiano Buenos Aires, Argentina. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
26
|
Jose S, Odetto D, Noll F, Saraniti G, Perrotta M. Infrarenal Minimally Invasive Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecologic Cancer. A Report of the First 100 Cases in Argentina. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
27
|
Noll F, Saadi J, Odetto D, Saraniti G, Perrotta M. LAPAROSCOPIC PARAAORTIC INFRARENAL LYMPHADENECTOMY: ANATOMICAL ANOMALIES FOUND IN OUR SERIES OF CASES AT THE GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY SECTION, DEPARTMENT OF GYNECOLOGY, HOSPITAL ITALIANO DE BUENOS AIRES: IGCS-0090 Cervical Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/00009577-201505001-00027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
28
|
Odetto D, Saadi J, Saraniti G, Noll F, Salvo G, Perrotta M. LAPAROSCOPIC POSTERIOR EXENTERATION IN CERVICAL CANCER: INITIAL EXPERIENCE AT HOSPITAL ITALIANO DE BUENOS AIRES: IGCS-0085 Cervical Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1136/00009577-201505001-00025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
|
29
|
Ramirez P, Odetto D, Conrad L. Robotic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
30
|
Clark L, Soliman P, Odetto D, Schmeler K, Fleming N, Westin S, Nick A, Ramirez P. Trocar Site Herniation as a Complication of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|