Self-harm presentations to hospital trauma centre emergency departments during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic raised concerns regarding increased suicide-related behaviours. We compared characteristics and counts of Emergency Department (ED) presentations for self-harm, an important suicide-related outcome, during versus prior to the pandemic's first year. We included patients presenting with self-harm to the ED of two trauma centres in Toronto, Canada. Time series models compared intra-pandemic (March 2020-February 2021) presentation counts to predictions from pre-pandemic data. The self-harm proportion of ED presentations was compared between the intra-pandemic period and preceding three years. A retrospective chart review of eligible patients seen from March 2019-February 2021 compared pre- vs. intra-pandemic patient and injury characteristics. While monthly intra-pandemic self-harm counts were largely within expected ranges, the self-harm proportion of total presentations increased. Being widowed (OR=9.46; 95 %CI=1.10-81.08), employment/financial stressors (OR=1.65, 95 %CI=1.06-2.58), job loss (OR=3.83; 95 %CI=1.36-10.76), and chest-stabbing self-harm (OR=2.50; 95 %CI=1.16-5.39) were associated with intra-pandemic presentations. Intra-pandemic self-harm was also associated with Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission (OR=2.18, 95 %CI=1.41-3.38). In summary, while the number of self-harm presentations to these trauma centres did not increase during the early pandemic, their proportion was increased. The association of intra-pandemic self-harm with variables indicating medically severe injury, economic stressors, and being widowed may inform future suicide and self-harm prevention strategies.

Long-Term Outcomes of NRG/RTOG 0126, a Randomized Trial of High Dose (79.2 Gy) vs. Standard Dose (70.2 Gy) Radiation Therapy (RT) for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

NRG/RTOG 0126, a phase III trial for men with localized prostate cancer testing whether dose escalation to 79.2 Gy with 3DCRT/IMRT improved overall survival (OS). Long-term results of this trial are presented.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with clinical stage T1b-T2b and either Gleason Score (GS) 2-6 and 10 ≤ PSA < 20 or GS 7 and PSA < 15 were eligible and randomized to receive 79.2 Gy or 70.2 Gy. No previous or concurrent androgen withdrawal therapy was administered. Treatment was delivered with 3DCRT/IMRT to a dose of 79.2 Gy in 44 fractions or 70.2 Gy in 39 fractions to the PTV encompassing the prostate and seminal vesicles. Image guidance was not required. ASTRO and Phoenix definitions were used for biochemical failure (ABF and PBF, respectively). OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and arms compared with the log-rank test. ABF, PBF, local progression (LP), distant metastases (DM) and time to late GI/GU toxicities were estimated by the cumulative incidence method and arms compared with Gray's test.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred thirty-two men were randomized, 763 to 79.2 Gy and 769 to 70.2 Gy. 1499 were eligible, 748 and 751 in the 79.2 Gy and 70.2 Gy arms respectively. Median age was 71, 70% had PSA < 10 ng/ml, 84% with GS 7, 57% had T1 disease, and 66% treated with 3D-CRT. Outcomes are shown in the TABLE: . With a median follow up of 12 years, there was no significant difference in OS. There was a statistically significant decrease in the cumulative incidence of ABF, PBF, DM, LP, and salvage therapies in the 79.2 Gy arm. There were significantly higher rates of grade 2+ GI and GU toxicity in the 79.2 Gy arm. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of grade 3+ GU or GI toxicity between either arm.

CONCLUSION

Long term follow up confirms no improvement in OS with dose escalation in this study population. However, there are significant improvements in ABF, PBF, DM, LP, and need for salvage therapy. Despite the use of more salvage therapy in the low dose arm, dose escalated RT resulted in lower rates of DM, a clinically relevant endpoint. Patients receiving dose escalation do experience a higher rate of grade 2+ GU and GI toxicity but no worse grade 3+ toxicities.

Predicted sensitivity to endocrine therapy for stage II-III hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer before chemo-endocrine therapy

BACKGROUND

We proposed that a test for sensitivity to the adjuvant endocrine therapy component of treatment for patients with stage II-III breast cancer (SET2,3) should measure transcription related to estrogen and progesterone receptors (SET_ER/PR index) adjusted for a baseline prognostic index (BPI) combining clinical tumor and nodal stage with molecular subtype by RNA4 (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and AURKA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with clinically high-risk, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer received neoadjuvant taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy, surgery with measurement of residual cancer burden (RCB), and then adjuvant endocrine therapy. SET2,3 was measured from pre-treatment tumor biopsies, evaluated first in an MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) cohort (n = 307, 11 years' follow-up, U133A microarrays), cut point was determined, and then independent, blinded evaluation was carried out in the I-SPY2 trial (n = 268, high-risk MammaPrint result, 3.8 years' follow-up, Agilent-44K microarrays, NCI Clinical Trials ID: NCT01042379). Primary outcome measure was distant relapse-free survival. Multivariate Cox regression models tested prognostic independence of SET2,3 relative to RCB and other molecular prognostic signatures, and whether other prognostic signatures could substitute for SET_ER/PR or RNA4 components of SET2,3.

RESULTS

SET2,3 added independent prognostic information to RCB in the MDACC cohort: SET2,3 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, P = 0.004] and RCB (HR 1.77, P < 0.001); and the I-SPY2 trial: SET2,3 (HR 0.27, P = 0.031) and RCB (HR 1.68, P = 0.008). SET2,3 provided similar prognostic information irrespective of whether RCB-II or RCB-III after chemotherapy, and in both luminal subtypes. Conversely, RCB was most strongly prognostic in cancers with low SET2,3 status (MDACC P < 0.001, I-SPY2 P < 0.001). Other molecular signatures were not independently prognostic; they could effectively substitute for RNA4 subtype within the BPI component of SET2,3, but they could not effectively substitute for SET_ER/PR index.

CONCLUSIONS

SET2,3 added independent prognostic information to chemotherapy response (RCB) and baseline prognostic score or subtype. Approximately 40% of patients with clinically high-risk HR+/HER2- disease had high SET2,3 and could be considered for clinical trials of neoadjuvant endocrine-based treatment.

Abstract P5-15-01: The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT as an initial staging procedure for stage II-III breast cancer reduces false positives, costs, and time to treatment: A multicenter value analysis in the I-SPY2 trial

Introduction: Diagnostic metastatic staging imaging (SI) for asymptomatic stage I-II patients (pts) is not routinely recommended, but is warranted in stage II-III pts with high risk biological subtypes, where previous trials have shown up to a 15% rate of de novo metastatic disease. NCCN guidelines endorse CT CAP and bone scan (STD) for stage III pts, but not PET/CT, and PET/CT is not covered in most parts of the country. We present data on the performance and value of PET/CT.

Methods: Data were available for 799 high risk clinical stage II-III pts screened for I-SPY2 at UCSF, Uminn, UAB, and Georgetown. Of these, 564 pts ranging in age from 25-81 (median = 48) had complete records that were retrospectively reviewed for SI and potential false positives (FP), defined as incidental findings on SI proven benign by subsequent workup. Economic evaluation was conducted from the payer perspective using the mean national 2018 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and representative costs from the UCSF billing department. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) measured the cost of using PET/CT per percent patient (pt) who avoided a FP.

Results: The rate of de novo metastatic disease was 4.8% (38/799), range 3.6-6.4%. Of the 564 pts with complete records, diagnostic SI varied significantly among the four sites (p &lt; 0.0001). STD was used for most pts at UAB (92.8%, 141/152) and Georgetown (85.7%, 54/63), while PET/CT was used for most pts at UCSF (86.6%, 226/261) and Uminn (63.6%, 56/88). Chest X-ray was used for 29.5% (26/88) at Uminn. There were significantly more pts with FP in the group that received STD (22.1%, 51/231) vs. PET/CT (11.1%, 33/298) (p &lt; 0.05). Mean time between incidental finding on SI to determination of FP was 10.8 days. When controlling for institution, mean time from cancer diagnosis to initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly different between STD (44.3 days) and PET/CT (37.5 days) groups (p &lt; 0.05). When aggregating the four sites using mean costs from the 2018 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, the mean cost/pt was $1132 for STD vs. $1477 for PET/CT. The mean increase in price from baseline SI costs due to FP workup was $216 (23.6%) for STD vs. $65 (4.6%) for PET/CT. The ICER was $31 per percent pt who avoided a FP. When analyzing UCSF pts alone using representative reimbursements from Medicare, the mean cost/pt was $1236 for STD vs. $1081 for PET/CT; using representative reimbursements from Anthem Blue Cross, the mean cost/pt was $3080 for STD vs. $1662 for PET/CT. The ICERs were -$10 and -$95 per percent pt who avoided a FP, respectively.

Conclusion: As compared to STD metastatic staging workup, PET/CT added value by decreasing FP two-fold. This reduced direct costs of FP workup procedures that took a mean time of 10.8 days to resolve. PET/CT also accelerated treatment start. Reducing the chance of FP workup for metastatic disease is of enormous value to pts. Our data establish the value of PET/CT for staging in our high risk clinical stage II-III trial population and highlight the need for alignment between hospital pricing strategies and payer coverage policies in order to deliver high value care to pts.

Citation Format: Hyland CJ, Varghese F, Yau C, Beckwith H, Khoury K, Varnado W, Hirst G, Chien J, Yee D, Isaacs C, Forero-Torres A, Esserman L, Melisko M, I-SPY2 Consortium. The use of 18F-FDG PET/CT as an initial staging procedure for stage II-III breast cancer reduces false positives, costs, and time to treatment: A multicenter value analysis in the I-SPY2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-01.

Abstract P2-14-01: The impact of local therapy on locoregional recurrence in women with high risk breast cancer in the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 TRIAL

Background: In women with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual cancer burden (RCB) predicts distant recurrence and survival. In those with high risk tumors, locoregional recurrence (LRR) remains a concern, and has been associated with type of local therapy received. We evaluated the impact of local therapy on LRR in the ISPY-2 TRIAL.

Methods: Data were analyzed in Stata 14.2, using Chi2 test, log rank test, and a Cox proportional hazards model. RCB was considered a categorical variable (0/1 versus 2/3), as described in prior publications. Breast surgery categories were lumpectomy +/- radiotherapy, or mastectomy +/- radiotherapy. Axillary surgery was defined as sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery (≤6 nodes removed) or axillary dissection (&gt;6 nodes).

Results: Follow up data from the I-SPY2 TRIAL were available for 630 patients (median follow up 2.76 yrs, range 0.4-7.2). Type of local therapy was significantly associated with clinical stage at presentation, with stage III patients most frequently undergoing mastectomy + radiation (p&lt;0.001). Women with higher RCB were more likely to undergo mastectomy than those with lower RCB (61.3% vs 48.8% mastectomy rate, p=0.002), and more likely to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (62.0% vs 53.9%, p=0.048). There was no association between clinical stage, type of surgery, or radiotherapy and LRR (Table). Higher RCB was significantly associated with LRR, with 3 year locoregional recurrence free rate of 95.1% in RCB 0/1 versus 89.9% in RCB 2/3 (p=0.003).

In a Cox model adjusting for clinical stage, tumor subtype, surgical therapy, RCB status, nodal radiation, and age, significant predictors for LRR were tumor subtype and RCB status. Hazard ratio (HR) for LRR in those with RCB 0/1 was 0.39 compared to those with RCB 2/3 (95% CI 0.17-0.87, p=0.021). There was no difference in LRR between breast conservation and mastectomy; within the breast conservation group, those who had lumpectomy alone had higher hazard of LRR compared to those having lumpectomy + radiation (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-9.2, p=0.043).

Conclusions: Extent of surgical therapy was not associated with local tumor control, regardless of advanced tumor stage at presentation. Rather, tumor biology and response to therapy were the best predictors of LRR. These data highlight the opportunity to minimize the morbidity of extensive surgical therapy for patients with excellent response to systemic therapy.

LRR rates by clinical features and treatment status FrequencyLRR RateP valueClinical Stage  0.5I240 (47.5%)5.8% II185 (36.6%)8.7% III80 (15.8%)6.3% Tumor Subtype  0.014ER+PR+Her2-161 (26.4%)3.1% ER+PR-Her2-56 (9.2%)3.6% Her2+176 (28.9%)6.3% Triple negative216 (35.5%)11.1% Local therapy  0.169Lumpectomy85 (13.5%)11.8% Lumpectomy with radiation198 (31.4%)5.6% Mastectomy173 (27.5%)5.2% Mastectomy with radiation174 (27.6%)8.6% Axillary surgery  0.23None5 (0.8%)20% SLN329 (52.2%)5.8% ALND296 (47%)8.5% Axillary radiation  0.535Yes42 (6.7%)9.5% No588 (93.3%)7.0% Axillary management  0.2No surgery or radiation5 (0.8%)20.0% SLN312 (50%)5.3% SLN+Axillary radiation17 (2.7%)8.3% ALND271 (43%)10.3% ALND+Axillary radiation25 (4%)5.4% RCB  0.0020/1293 (50.1%)3.8% 2/3292 (49.9%)10.3% 

Citation Format: Silverstein J, Suleiman L, Yau C, Price ER, Singhrao R, Yee D, DeMichele A, Isaacs C, Albain KS, Chien AJ, Forero-Torres A, Wallace AM, Pusztai L, Ellis ED, Elias AD, Lang JE, Lu J, Han HS, Clark AS, Korde L, Nanda R, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Viscusi RK, Euhus DM, Edmiston KK, Chui SY, Kemmer K, Wood WC, Park JW, Liu MC, Olopade O, Leyland-Jones B, Tripathy D, Moulder SL, Rugo HS, Schwab R, Lo S, Helsten T, Beckwith H, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Consortium, Berry DA, Asare SM, Esserman LJ, Boughey JC, Mukhtar RA. The impact of local therapy on locoregional recurrence in women with high risk breast cancer in the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-01.

Abstract P2-07-03: Refining neoadjuvant predictors of three year distant metastasis free survival: Integrating volume change as measured by MRI with residual cancer burden

Background: Patients achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy have significantly improved event-free survival relative to those who do not; and pCR is an FDA-accepted endpoint to support accelerated approval of novel agents/combinations in the neoadjuvant treatment of high risk early stage breast cancer. Previous studies have shown that recurrence risk increased with increasing burden of residual disease (as assessed by the RCB index). As well, these studies suggest that patients with minimum residual disease (RCB-I class) also have favorable outcomes (comparable to those achieving a pCR) within high risk tumor subtypes. In this study, we assess whether integrating RCB with MRI functional tumor volume (FTV), which in itself is prognostic, can improve prediction of distant recurrence free survival (DRFS); and identify a subset of patients with minimal residual disease with comparable DRFS as those who achieved a pCR. Imaging tools can then be used to identify the subset that will do well early and guide the timing of surgical therapy.

Method: We performed a pooled analysis of 596 patients from the I-SPY2 TRIAL with RCB, pre-surgical MRI FTV data and known follow-up (median 2.5 years). We first assessed whether FTV predicts residual disease (pCR or pCR/RCB-I) using ROC analysis. We applied a power transformation to normalize the pre-surgical FTV distribution; and assessed its association with DRFS using a bi-variate Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for HR/HER2 subtype. We also fitted a bivariate Cox model of RCB index adjusting for subtype; and assessed whether adding pre-surgical FTV to this model further improves association with DRFS using a likelihood ratio (LR) test. For the Cox modeling, penalized splines approximation of the transformed FTV and RCB index with 2 degrees of freedom was used to allow for non-linear effects of FTV and RCB on DRFS.

Result: Pre-surgical MRI FTV is significantly associated with DRFS (Wald p&lt;0.00001), and more effective at predicting pCR/RCB-I than predicting pCR alone (AUC: 0.72 vs. 0.65). Larger pre-surgical FTV remains associated with worse DRFS adjusting for subtype (Wald p &lt;0.00001). The RCB index is also significantly associated with DRFS adjusting for subtype (Wald p&lt;0.00001). Adding FTV to a model containing RCB and subtype further improves association with DRFS (LR p=0.0007). RCB-I patients have excellent DRFS (94% at 3 years compared to 95% in the pCR group). Efforts are underway to identify an optimal threshold for dichotomizing pre-surgical FTV and FTV change measures for use in combination with pCR/RCB-I class to generate integrated RCB (iRCB) groups as a composite predictor of DRFS.

Conclusion: Pre-surgical MRI FTV is effective at predicting minimal residual disease (RCB0/I) in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. Despite the association between FTV and RCB, FTV appears to provide independent added prognostic value (to RCB and subtype), suggesting that integrating MRI volume measures and RCB into a composite predictor may improve DRFS prediction.

Citation Format: Hylton NM, Symmans WF, Yau C, Li W, Hatzis C, Isaacs C, Albain KS, Chen Y-Y, Krings G, Wei S, Harada S, Datnow B, Fadare O, Klein M, Pambuccian S, Chen B, Adamson K, Sams S, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Magliocco A, Feldman M, Rendi M, Sattar H, Zeck J, Ocal I, Tawfik O, Grasso LeBeau L, Sahoo S, Vinh T, Yang S, Adams A, Chien AJ, Ferero-Torres A, Stringer-Reasor E, Wallace A, Boughey JC, Ellis ED, Elias AD, Lang JE, Lu J, Han HS, Clark AS, Korde L, Nanda R, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Viscusi RK, Euhus DM, Edmiston KK, Chui SY, Kemmer K, Wood WC, Park JW, Liu MC, Olopade O, Tripathy D, Moulder SL, Rugo HS, Schwab R, Lo S, Helsten T, Beckwith H, Haugen PK, van't Veer LJ, Perlmutter J, Melisko ME, Wilson A, Peterson G, Asare AL, Buxton MB, Paoloni M, Clennell JL, Hirst GL, Singhrao R, Steeg K, Matthews JB, Sanil A, Berry SM, Abe H, Wolverton D, Crane EP, Ward KA, Nelson M, Niell BL, Oh K, Brandt KR, Bang DH, Ojeda-Fournier H, Eghtedari M, Sheth PA, Bernreuter WK, Umphrey H, Rosen MA, Dogan B, Yang W, Joe B, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Consortium, Yee D, Pusztai L, DeMichele A, Asare SM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Refining neoadjuvant predictors of three year distant metastasis free survival: Integrating volume change as measured by MRI with residual cancer burden [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-03.

Abstract P1-12-06: Endothelial dysfunction in breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors (AIs) over time

Endothelial dysfunction in breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors (AIs) over time

Background: AIs reduce breast cancer-related mortality however they may increase cardiovascular (CV) risk. Our previously published cross-sectional study suggested women on AIs were more likely to have endothelial dysfunction when measured by EndoPAT ratio as compared to healthy postmenopausal women. Reductions in EndoPAT ratio (&lt;1.67) and small artery elasticity (SAE) and increases in highly sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP) are associated with worsening endothelial dysfunction and increased cardiovascular events. We present data from a longitudinal pilot study looking at endothelial dysfunction over time in women on AIs.

Methods: Fourteen women with locally advanced breast cancer prescribed an AI underwent vascular testing at baseline (pre-AI) and at 6 months. Subjects with tobacco use, hypertension or hyperlipidemia were excluded. Consented subjects underwent biomarker analysis and radial artery pulse wave analysis using the HDI/Pulse Wave CR-2000 CV Profiling System and pulse contour analysis using the Endo-PAT2000 system. Biomarkers were obtained using a fasting blood draw to evaluate the following lipids and inflammatory markers: serum ultrasensitive estradiol, serum glucose, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and triglycerides (TG), CRP, plasminogen-activator 1 (PA1), and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA). Changes between baseline and follow-up using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were analyzed.

Results: Mean baseline age was 59 years and median body mass index was 26.5 kg/m2. Median systolic blood pressure and total cholesterol were 120/70 mm/Hg and 228 mg/dL, respectively. Baseline ultrasensitive estradiol levels were 7 pg/mL and hsCRP was 2.45 mg/dL. Prior to AI therapy, endoPAT ratio was 2.18 (1.19, 2.43). After six months, EndoPAT ratio declined to a median 1.12 (0.85, 1.86) (p=0.045). There were no statistically significant changes in serum glucose, TC, LDL, HDL, hsCRP, PA1 and tPA. HsCRP remained elevatedat median 2.98 mg/L. At six months, estradiol levels decreased to a median of 2 pg/mL (p=0.052), however, there appeared to be no linear association between changes in EndoPAT and estradiol (p=0.91).

Conclusion: Breast cancer survivors on AIs have endothelial dysfunction, a predictor of adverse CV disease. These changes develop while on AIs. Underlying pathophysiology requires further evaluation.

Cardiovascular markersMeasuresBaselineFollow-Up at 6 MonthsChangeP-valueBMI (kg/m2)26.5 (24.4, 31.6)27.1 (23.9, 32.9)0.5 (0.0, 1.3)0.056SBP (mmHg)120 (115, 124)123 (114, 127)-0.8 (-7.4, 3.6)0.91DBP (mmHg)70 (61, 73)69 (62, 71)0.0 (-3.0, 2.6)0.88Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)228 (202, 244)213 (210, 229)-1 (-18, 27)0.70HDL (mg/dL)64 (58, 69)73 (61, 77)2 (-3, 14)0.44LDL (mg/dL)143 (121, 159)129 (120, 142)6 (-11, 14)0.65Estradiol (pg/mL)7 (4, 15)2 (2, 3)-8 (-12, -3)0.05hsCRP (mg/dL)2.45 (1.14, 6.07)2.98 (0.90, 4.81)-8 (-12, -3)0.85EndoPAT Ratio2.18 (1.19, 2.43)1.12 (0.85, 1.86)-0.16 (-1.45, -0.02)0.0451.Summaries shown are median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile).

Citation Format: Blaes AH, Petersen A, Beckwith H, Potter D, Florea N, Yee D, Vogel R, Duprez D. Endothelial dysfunction in breast cancer survivors on aromatase inhibitors (AIs) over time [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-06.

Abstract P2-06-03: Insulin receptor isoform signaling in breast cancer

Recent data shows that insulin receptor (IR) and the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) play important roles in breast cancer cell biology. Targeting only IGF1R has not been successful perhaps due to compensation by IR. IR exists in two isoforms, fetal isoform IR-A is a splice variant of IR which excludes exon 11. The adult/metabolic isoform IR-B is the predominant species expressed in normal tissues, while the fetal form IR-A is more highly expressed in breast cancer. IR-A mRNA in endocrine resistant cells is expressed at levels 24-fold higher than IGF1R expression (Gradishar, et al. Clin Cancer Res 22:301 2016 PMID: 26324738). In addition to its homodimer, IR-A can also dimerize with IGF1R to form a hybrid. Homodimer IR-A responds to IGF-II and insulin, while IGF1R/IR-A hybrid can also respond to IGF-I. Previous studies in our lab showed down regulation of IGFIR increases the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to insulin. To further investigate the roles of IR-A and IR-B in breast cancer biology, we cloned IR-A and IR-B isoforms into pLV-mCherry and pLJM1EGFP lentiviral expression vectors. Then MCF-7L breast cancer cells were infected with IR-A, IR-A vector control, IR-B and IR-B vector control. Both pooled and single clones were studied. Our results showed that both IR-A and IR-B were highly expressed in MCF-7L cells with the introduced IR tagged species present at a higher molecular weight confirmed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblot. The lower migrating species was endogenous IR. IR-A-pool/Clones had strong basal IR tyrosine phosphorylation, while IR-B-pool/clones did not. This basal phosphorylation did not activate downstream signaling as measured by pAKT and pErk1,2. IR-A basal phosphorylation was completely inhibited by BMS754807 (0.3μM), a dual IGFIR/IR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Total levels of IRS1, IRS2, IGF1R, ERa, AKT and Erk1,2 levels were not changed in the over-expressing cells. Ligands-IGF-I (5nM), IGF-II (10nM) and Insulin (10nM) stimulated IGF1R/IR, IRS, AKT and Erk1,2 phosphorylation in IR-A-pool and high expression clone IR-A-G5. Cells expressing IR-A activated downstream signaling (IRS, AKT and Erk1,2) at 0.1nM insulin, while IR-A vector control cells required 1nM insulin. IR-B-pool overexpressing cells were not more sensitive to insulin compared to parental cells. Insulin significantly increased Erk1,2 phosphorylation in IR-A-G5 cell while IGF-I stimulation was minimal. In contrast, Erk1,2 phosphorylation in parental cells and vector control cells was primarily mediated by IGF-I, not insulin. IR-A overexpressing cells were stimulated in monolayer growth by insulin. These data show that IR-A expression, as seen in endocrine resistant breast cancer cells, sensitizes breast cancers to low concentrations of insulin. Thus, IR-A expression could serve as a target in breast cancer.

Citation Format: Zhang X, Chan JY, Pan Y, Dong C, Yee D. Insulin receptor isoform signaling in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-06-03.

Abstract P1-15-02: Withdrawn

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Citation Format: Schwab R, Clark A, Yau C, Wolf D, Chien AJ, Majure M, Ewing C, Wallace A, Roesch E, Helsten T, Forero A, Stringer-Reasor E, Vaklavas C, Nanda R, Jaskowiak N, Boughey J, Haddad T, Han H, Lee C, Albain K, Isaacs C, Elias A, Ellis E, Shah P, Lang J, Lu J, Tripathy D, Kemmer K, Yee D, Haley B, Korde L, Edmiston K, Northfelt D, Viscusi R, Khan Q, I-SPY 2 Consortium, Symmans WF, Perlmutter J, Hylton N, Rugo H, Melisko M, Wilson A, Singhrao R, Asare S, van't Veer L, DeMichele A, Berry D, Esserman L. Withdrawn [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-02.

Abstract P3-10-02: Identifying breast cancer molecular phenotypes to predict response in a modern treatment landscape: Lessons from ˜1000 patients across 10 arms of the I-SPY 2 TRIAL

Background: The explosion in new treatment options targeting immune checkpoints, HER signaling, DNA repair deficiency, AKT, and other pathways calls for updated breast cancer subtypes beyond HR and HER2 status to predict which patients will respond to which treatments. Here we leverage the I-SPY 2 TRIAL biomarker program over the past 8 years across 10 treatment arms to elucidate a minimal set of biomarkers that may improve response prediction in a modern treatment context, and to investigate which new patient phenotypes are identified by these response-predictive biomarkers.

Methods: 986 patients were considered in this analysis. Treatments included paclitaxel alone (or with trastuzumab (H) in HER2+) or combined with investigational agents: veliparib/carboplatin (VC); neratinib; MK2206; ganitumab; ganetespib; AMG386; TDM1/pertuzumab (P); H/P; and pembrolizumab (Pembro). 24 prospectively defined, mechanism-of-action and pathway-based expression and phospho-protein signatures/biomarkers assayed from pre-treatment biopsies were previously found to be predictive in a particular agent/arm in pre-specified analysis. Here we evaluate these biomarkers in all patients. We assessed association between each biomarker and response in the population as a whole and within each arm and HR/HER2 subtype using a logistic model. To identify optimal dichotomizing thresholds for select biomarkers, 2-fold cross-validation was repeated 500 times. Our analysis is exploratory and does not adjust for multiplicities.

Results: Our initial set of 24 predictive biomarkers reflects DNA repair deficiency (n=2), immune activation (n=7), ER signaling (n=2), HER2 signaling (n=4), proliferation (n=2), phospho-activation of AKT/mTOR (n=2), and ANG/TIE2 (n=1) pathways, among others. Biomarkers reflecting similar biology are correlated and cluster together. We make use of this correlation structure to reduce the dimensionality of the biomarker set to five predictive signals: proliferation, DNA repair deficiency (DRD), immune-engaged (Immune+), luminal/ER (lum), and HER2-activated. These biomarkers, when dichotomized, identify patient groups with differential predicted sensitivities to I-SPY 2 agents and are present at different proportions within receptor subtypes. For instance, in the HER2- subset, Immune+/DRD+ patients are predicted sensitive to both VC and Pembro, and account for 39% of TN, but only 12% of HR+HER2-. On the other end of the spectrum, only 17% of TN are Immune-/DRD-, compared to the majority (56%) of HR+HER2-. There are also subsets of patients positive for only one marker. For the HER2+ subset, 67% are HER2-activated+, and 25% lum+; of these HER2-activated+ patients are more likely to be Immune+ (44%), vs 23% in lum+. HER2-activated+/Immune+ patients have higher predicted sensitivity to HER2-targeted agents than lum+ or Immune- patients.

In all, these molecular phenotypes predict sensitivity to one or more I-SPY 2 investigational agents for 75% of the ˜ 1000 patients.

Conclusion: Molecular phenotypes reflecting proliferation, immune engagement, HER2-activation, luminal/ER-signaling, and DNA repair deficiency may provide a roadmap to guide treatment prioritization for emerging therapeutics.

Citation Format: Wolf DM, Yau C, Wulfkuhle J, Petricoin E, Campbell M, Brown-Swigart L, Hirst G, Asare S, Zhu Z, Lee EP, Delson A, Pohlmann P, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Consortium, Hylton N, Liu MC, Symmans F, DeMichele A, Yee D, Berry D, Esserman L, van 't Veer L. Identifying breast cancer molecular phenotypes to predict response in a modern treatment landscape: Lessons from ˜1000 patients across 10 arms of the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-02.

Abstract P5-03-05: Model of acquired resistance to the tyrphostin NT157 in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

As previously reported, the small-molecule tyrphostin NT157 binds to the type I insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) beta subunit (IGF-IRβ) resulting in degradation of the insulin receptor substrate (IRS) adaptor proteins and inhibits growth of tamoxifen sensitive and resistant ER+ breast cancer cells (Yang, Y. et al. Horm Canc, in press). To investigate effects related to long-term NT157 exposure on IGF signaling, we incubated T47D parental cells in increasing concentrations of NT157 for 20 months. This prolonged exposure resulted in resistant cells (T47D-NTR). Monolayer growth assays showed parental cells inhibited at 0.7 μM of NT157 whereas resistant cells were suppressed by 8 μM of NT157. In parental cells, NT157 caused G0-G1 arrest and an increase in the sub-G1 fraction. However, resistant cells did not show these cell cycle changes after exposure to NT157. Furthermore, the antiproliferative effect of prolonged exposure to 96 hours of NT157 was correlated with decreased activation of Akt/S6k signaling axis and reduction of cyclin D1 expression in T47D parental cells. 48 hours treatment with 5 μM of NT157 resulted in a decrease of IGF-IR and insulin receptor (InR) expression level at 33% and 39% respectively, along with the downregulation of the adaptor proteins IRS-1/2 in only the parental cell line. In resistant cells, the NT157 treatment induced minimal IGF-1R suppression and a 21% increase of IR expression. Additionally, the T47D-NTR cells-maintained IRS protein levels at 10 μM. This absence of IRS protein degradation observed in NT157-resistant cells correlated with the continued expression of estrogen receptor-alpha (ERα), suggesting functional changes within IGF and ERα complex. IGF ligands (IGF-1 or IGF-2) and estradiol (E2) stimulated growth in both cell lines. When NT157 was removed from T47D-NTR cells, they were not re-sensitized to NT157 nor were they affected by IGF dependent growth in the re-introduction of NT157. These findings suggest that resistance to NT157 is mediated by the maintained expression of the IRS adaptor proteins. The continued responsiveness to estradiol and IGF ligands could be due to either a decrease in the drug's half-life or possible changes in NT157 binding to the beta subunit of IGF-IR in resistant cells.

Citation Format: Ekyalongo RC, Abdelwahab R, Holtz A, Sabet A, Yee D. Model of acquired resistance to the tyrphostin NT157 in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-03-05.

Abstract P1-05-03: Isoform specific targeting of insulin receptor

The insulin receptor (InsR) exists in both an A and B isoform. InsR-B differs from InsR-A by the inclusion of exon 11, which encodes 12 amino acid residues at the C-terminus of the InsR alpha-subunit. Increased InsR-A expression is associated with mitogenic signaling pathways while InsR-B is linked to insulin-mediated metabolic functions. Predominant InsR-A expression may therefore be important in growth and fetal development of embryos, whereas predominant InsR-B expression has a role in metabolic insulin action in adult life. Increased InsR-A expression is seen in breast cancer. In endocrine resistant breast cancer, InsR-A is expressed at high levels (Gradishar, et al. Clin Cancer Res 22:301 2016 PMID: 26324738). Thus, developing InsR-A specific inhibitors could be a useful therapy for breast cancer. We have previously published InsR specific binders using a T7 phage gene 2 protein (Gp2), a small protein scaffold (Chan, et al. Mol Cancer Ther 16:1324 2017 PMID: 28468775), with the long-term goal of creating effective InsR inhibitors and diagnostics. Using yeast display and directed evolution, we identified three Gp2 variants (Gp2 #1, #5, and #10) with low nanomolar affinity and specific binding to cell surface InsR. We have shown that these Gp2 variants inhibited insulin-mediated monolayer proliferation in both endocrine-sensitive and resistant breast cancer, but did not downregulate InsR expression. To further characterize the specificity of Gp2 variants, we used two techniques. HEK293T cells were infected with lentiviral vectors expressing either InsR-A tagged with mCherry or InsR-B tagged with eGFP. Using these cells, we performed “mock panning” and showed the Gp2 #5 variant bound both InsR-A and InsR-B, but had higher affinity for InsR-B. We also incorporated Gp2 #5 into the capsid of a tropism-null adeno-associated virus (AAV). Using this Gp2-AAV, we infected HEK293T-InsR-A or InsR-B cells at a number of different multiplicities of infection. These data were consistent with panning data and showed specific Gp2-AAV infection of cells expressing high levels of InsR-B, but not InsR-A. Thus, our data show that Gp2 variants we created have a higher affinity for InsR-B than InsR-A. Despite this preferred affinity, these Gp2 binders have sufficient binding to InsR-A to disrupt the biological effects of insulin in breast cancer cells. Thus, even relatively low affinity binding to InsR-A can disrupt its function. Further development of InsR-A Gp2 binders may be developed and provide more specific targeting of the breast cancer specific isoform of InsR.

Citation Format: LaPara K, Chan JY, Zdechlik A, Ljunggren K, Schmidt D, Hackel B, Yee D. Isoform specific targeting of insulin receptor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-05-03.

Abstract PD6-08: Analysis of immune infiltrates (assessed via multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry) and immune gene expression signatures as predictors of response to the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial

Background: Pembrolizumab (Pembro), an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of a variety of cancers including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma. Pembro was recently evaluated in HER2- breast cancer patients in the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 TRIAL and graduated in the triple negative (TN), HR+HER2-, and HER2- signatures. HER2- patients were randomized to receive Pembro+paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (P+T -&gt; AC) vs. T -&gt; AC. We and others have shown that TN breast cancers tend to have high numbers of immune infiltrates, including T cells and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs). We evaluated expression signatures representing 14 immune cell types (TILs, T cells, CD8 T cells, exhausted T cells, Th1, Tregs, cytotoxic cells, NK, NK CD56dim, dendritic cells, mast cells, B cells, macrophages, and neutrophils) as specific predictors of response to Pembro.

Methods: Data from 248 patients (Pembro: 69; controls: 179) were available. Pre-treatment biopsies were assayed using Agilent gene expression arrays. Signature scores are calculated by averaging cell type specific genes. All I-SPY 2 qualifying biomarker analyses follow a pre-specified analysis plan. We used logistic modeling to assess biomarker performance. A biomarker is considered a specific predictor of Pembro response if it associates with response in the Pembro arm but not the control arm, and if the biomarker x treatment interaction is significant (likelihood ratio test, p&lt;0.05). This analysis is also performed adjusting for HR status as covariates, and within receptor subsets. For successful biomarkers, we use Bayesian modeling to estimate the pCR rates of 'predicted sensitive' patients in each arm. Our statistics are descriptive rather than inferential and do not adjust for multiplicities of other biomarkers outside this study.

Results: 10 out of the 14 cell-type signatures tested are associated with response in the Pembro arm. Higher expression levels of 9 of these cell-type signatures are associated with higher pCR rates (T cells, exhausted T cells, Th1, cytotoxic cells, NK, NK CD56dim, dendritic cells, B cells, and macrophages), whereas higher mast cell signature expression is associated with non-pCR. Interestingly, many of these same signatures also associate or trend towards association with response in the control arm; and in a model adjusting for HR status, only 3 of these signatures (Th1, B cells and dendritic cells) show significant interaction with treatment. Within the whole population and the TN subtype, the dendritic cell signature is the strongest predictor of specific response to Pembro (OR/1SD: 4.04 and 4.4, LR p &lt; 0.001 overall and in TN). Although other immune signatures (T cells, exhausted T cells, NK, and macrophages) also associate with response in the Pembro arm in the TN subtype, only the dendritic cell and Th1 signatures have a significant interaction with treatment. In contrast, in the HR+HER2- subtype, only 3 signatures (Th1, B cells, and mast cells) associate with response to Pembro; but none of these signatures have significant interaction with treatment. Of note, in both the Pembro and control arms, HR+HER2- patients with higher average mast cell marker expression have lower pCR rates (OR/1SD: 0.33 and 0.51, LRp: 0.006 and 0.04 in Pembro and control arm).

Conclusion: As expected, multiple immune cell expression signatures are predictive of response in the Pembro arm; but only dendritic cells and Th1 cells are specific to Pembro in both the population as a whole and the TN subtype. Interestingly, the presence of mast cells may impede response, especially in HR+HER2- patients. Correlation of these signatures with multiplex-IF immune markers is pending.

Citation Format: Campbell M, Yau C, Borowsky A, Vandenberg S, Wolf D, Rimm D, Nanda R, Liu M, Brown-Swigart L, Hirst G, Asare S, van't Veer L, Yee D, DeMichele A, Berry D, Esserman L. Analysis of immune infiltrates (assessed via multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry) and immune gene expression signatures as predictors of response to the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-08.

Abstract P3-07-01: IRS1 expression is required for estrogen stimulated growth in breast cancer cells

Insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins are adaptor proteins phosphorylated by activated type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) and insulin receptor (IR). In addition to their roles in normal cell physiology, we have shown IRS expression is required for breast cancer cell growth and motility. IRS1 plays a more important role in mitogenesis and survival while IRS2 in cancer cell metastasis. Moreover, this family of adaptor proteins is also involved in the signal transduction of many other transmembrane receptors. Thus, IRS proteins could be potential cancer therapeutic targets. We have previously shown that reduced IRS1 impairs IGF and insuliln stimulated cancer cell growth and tumorigenicity even when signaling is not affected due to possible compensation of IRS2 and other adaptor proteins. To further study the role of IRS-1 function in breast cancer, we created doxycycline inducible IRS-1 shRNA cells. We also found that IRS1 knockdown significantly reduced estradiol stimulated growth. To investigate if reduced IRS1 regulated E2 stimulated binding of ERa ChIP assay was performed using the pS2 promoter. Compared to parental MCF-7L cells, inducible IRS1 knock down clone 3G5 demonstrated significantly reduced promoter binding. Degradation of IRS-1 with a pharmacologic antagonist (NT-157) also diminished ERa binding to pS2 promoter. Further qRT-PCR analysis for mRNA levels of estrogen regulated genes, such as PGR, TFF1, etc. showed those genes were significantly down regulated. To evaluate effects of IRS-1 levels on estrogen stimulated growth, we evaluated 3G5-B12 (a subclone of 3G5) cell growth in a xenograft model. 3G5-B12 cells have similar levels of IGFIR and ERa expression compared to their parent cells. Estrogen dependent xenograft growth was similar to those of parent MCF-7L cells. After doxycycline was administered in the diet, 3G5-B12 tumor growth was significantly inhibited compared to those fed with normal mouse diet, and this inhibition was prolonged at least 2 and a half months. Parental MCF-7L tumor growth was not affected by the doxycycline diet. Doxycycline inducible IRS1 knock down significantly prolonged the time before tumors reached 1000mm3 compared with those tumors on a normal diet. In conclusion, IRS-1 is required for optimal estrogen receptor function as measured by promoter binding and xenograft growth. Our data suggested suppression of IRS-1 function may target several growth pathways in breast cancer cells and represents a new drug target.

Citation Format: Zhang X, Varma S, Yee D. IRS1 expression is required for estrogen stimulated growth in breast cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-01.

Abstract PD6-14: Analysis of DNA repair deficiency biomarkers as predictors of response to the PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab: Results from the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial for stage II-III high-risk breast cancer

Background: Pembrolizumab (P), an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, has been approved for treatment of microsatellite instability-high and mismatch repair deficient cancers. In I-SPY 2, patients were randomized to receive standard chemotherapy alone or in combination with an experimental agent. P was one of the experimental agents evaluated in HER2- patients in I-SPY 2 and graduated in the TN, HR+HER2-, and HER2- signatures. We hypothesize that a combination of two signatures predicting response to veliparib/carboplatin therapy in I-SPY 2 [MammaPrint High2 (MP2)/PARPi7-high] and reflecting DNA damage repair deficiency, may also predict response to P. In addition, we also tested 9 gene expression signatures reflecting different aspects of DNA damage and repair: FA, MMR, BER, HR, TLS, NER, NHEJ, DR, and DNA damage sensing (DDS) pathways.

Methods: Data from 249 patients (P: 69 and controls: 180) were available. Pre-treatment biopsies were assayed using Agilent gene expression arrays. All I-SPY 2 qualifying biomarker analyses follow a pre-specified analysis plan. We used logistic modeling to assess biomarker performance. A biomarker is considered a specific predictor of P response if it associates with response in the P arm but not the control arm, and if the biomarker x treatment interaction is significant (likelihood ratio test, p&lt;0.05). This analysis is also performed adjusting for HR status as a covariate, and within receptor subsets, sample size permitting. For successful biomarkers, we use Bayesian modeling to estimate the pCR rates of 'predicted sensitive' patients in each arm. Our statistics are descriptive rather than inferential and do not adjust for multiplicities of other biomarkers outside this study.

Results: MP2 status associates with pCR in P (OR=7.7; p=0.00021), but also to a lesser extent in the control arm (OR=2.4:p=0.045), with an OR ratio of 3.3 which trends toward significance, even after adjusting for HR status (LR p=0.083). A majority of TN patients are MP2; and TN/MP2 patients have an estimated pCR rate of 67% in P (vs. 23% in control). Although only ~30% of HR+HER2- patients were MP2, their estimated pCR rate in P is 61%, compared to 29% in unselected HR+/HER2- patients. PARPi7 predicted response in the P arm only in the HR+HER2- group (LR p= 0.025), but not in the population as a whole or the TN subtype. Combining MP2 and PARPi7 into MP2/PARPi7-high did not improve performance over MP2 as a single biomarker. Of the 9 DDR pathway signatures tested, both BER and DDS associate with pCR in P, but only DDS (which includes ATM, ATR, CHEK1-2) associates with pCR in the P arm (LR p=0.00029), and not the control arm (LR p=0.53), with a significant interaction with treatment (LR p=0.0064) that retains significance in a model adjusting for HR status. When dichotomized to optimize the biomarker x treatment interaction, the estimated pCR rate is 75% in P vs 18% in control, in the DDS+ subset.

Conclusion: In this small study, MP2 status and a DNA damage sensing pathway but not the PARPi7 or other repair pathways show promise as predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition therapy in breast cancer.

Citation Format: Yau C, Wolf D, Brown-Swigart L, Hirst G, Sanil A, Singhrao R, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Investigators, Asare S, DeMichele A, Berry D, Esserman L, van 't Veer L, Nanda R, Liu M, Yee D. Analysis of DNA repair deficiency biomarkers as predictors of response to the PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab: Results from the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial for stage II-III high-risk breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-14.

Abstract OT3-06-02: A phase Ib trial of xentuzumab and abemaciclib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (plus endocrine therapy)

Background: Resistance to endocrine therapy remains an important clinical problem in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC), necessitating alternative treatment options. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis and cyclin D-cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6-retinoblastoma pathway have been implicated in the pathogenesis and resistance mechanisms of a variety of cancers, including BC. Binding of IGF-I and -II to the IGF receptor results in upregulation of cyclin D1, and subsequent progression through the cell cycle, thus providing rationale for the simultaneous inhibition of IGF-I and -II and CDK4/6. This Phase Ib trial assesses the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety and preliminary efficacy of the IGF-ligand-neutralizing antibody, xentuzumab, in combination with abemaciclib, a selective, small-molecule inhibitor of both CDK4 and 6, in patients (pts) with solid tumors. The trial includes four dose finding cohorts followed by two expansion cohorts. Only those cohorts that will include pts with postmenopausal HR+, HER2- BC will be presented here.

Trial design: In this phase Ib multicenter, non-randomized, open-label, dose escalation trial (BI 1280.18 [NCT03099174]), the key aims in the BC cohorts (Cohorts B–D, F) are to define the MTD or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and to evaluate the preliminary efficacy, safety and tolerability of xentuzumab plus abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapies. Eligible pts include adults ≥18 yrs (≥20 for Japan), with measurable or evaluable disease, adequate organ function, ECOG PS ≤1, and postmenopausal locally advanced or metastatic HR+, HER2- BC (Cohorts B–D, F). CDK4/6 inhibitor-naïve pts (Cohorts B–D) and pts who have received prior CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib or ribociclib) plus aromatase inhibitors (Cohort F) are included. The MTD/RP2D of xentuzumab plus abemaciclib to be used in Cohorts B–D will be established in pts with solid tumors (Cohort A) who will receive xentuzumab (starting dose 1000mg weekly iv) plus abemaciclib (starting dose 150mg every 12 hours). CDK4/6 inhibitor-naïve pts with BC will receive xentuzumab plus abemaciclib at the RP2D determined in Cohort A in combination with letrozole (2.5mg/day; Cohort B), anastrozole (1mg/day; Cohort C), or fulvestrant (500mg/month; Cohort D). CDK4/6 inhibitor pre-treated pts with BC (Cohort F) will receive xentuzumab plus abemaciclib and fulvestrant at the RP2D determined in Cohort D. Primary endpoints in the BC cohorts are the MTD and/or RP2D of xentuzumab plus abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapies, and the objective response (OR) in CDK4/6 inhibitor pre-treated pts with advanced BC (Cohort F); disease control (DC), duration of DC, time to OR, duration of OR, and progression-free survival (PFS) in Cohort F are secondary endpoints. Additionally, PK outcomes, safety and tolerability will be assessed in all cohorts. This study will be conducted in the US, Europe and Japan. Pt screening started in May 2017. Target enrolment is ˜88 pts, including ˜56 pts with advanced HR+, HER2- BC, of whom ˜20 had previously been treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors.

Citation Format: Yee D, Sablin MP, Iwata H, Johnston EL, Bogenrieder T, Serra J, Hua H, Lo Russo P, Prat A. A phase Ib trial of xentuzumab and abemaciclib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, including hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (plus endocrine therapy) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-06-02.

Abstract P6-11-04: The evaluation of ganitumab/metformin plus standard neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 trial

Background: I-SPY 2 is a multicenter, phase 2 trial using response-adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes to evaluate novel agents when added to standard neoadjuvant therapy for women with high-risk stage II/III breast cancer - investigational agent(I) +paclitaxel(T) qwk, doxorubicin & cyclophosphamide(AC) q2-3 wk x 4 vs. T/AC (control arm). The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR) at surgery. The goal is to identify/graduate regimens that have ≥85% Bayesian predictive probability of success (statistical significance) in a 300-patient phase 3 neoadjuvant trial defined by hormone-receptor (HR) & HER2 status & MammaPrint (MP). Regimens may also leave the trial for futility (&lt; 10% probability of success) or following accrual of maximum sample size (10%&lt; probability of success &lt;85%). We report the results for experimental arm Ganitumab, a type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) inhibitor. IGF1R inhibitors are known to induce insulin resistance and all patients assigned to Ganitumab received metformin.

Methods: Women with tumors ≥2.5cm were eligible for screening. MP low/HR+ and HER2+ tumors were ineligible for randomization. Hemoglobin A1C≥ 8.0% were ineligible. MRI scans (baseline, 3 cycles after start of therapy, at completion of weekly T and prior to surgery) were used in a longitudinal statistical model to improve the efficiency of adaptive randomization. Ganitumab was given at 12mg/kg q2 weeks and metformin at 850mg PO BID, while receiving ganitumab. Analysis was intention to treat with patients who switched to non-protocol therapy counted as non-pCRs. Ganitumab/metformin was open only to HER2- patients, and eligible for graduation in 3 of 10 pre-defined signatures: HER2-, HR+HER2- and HR-HER2-.

Results: Ganitumab/metformin did not meet the criteria for graduation in the 3 signatures tested. When the maximum sample size was reached, accrual to this arm stopped. Ganitumab/metformin was assigned to 106 patients; there were 128 controls. We report probabilities of superiority for Ganitumab/metformin over control and Bayesian predictive probabilities of success in a neoadjuvant phase 3 trial equally randomized between Ganitumab/metformin and control, for each of the 3 biomarker signatures, using the final pathological response data from all patients. Safety data will be presented.

SignatureEstimated pCR Rate (95% probability interval)Probability Ganitumab/ Metformin Is Superior to ControlPredictive Probability of Success in Phase 3 Ganitumab/ Metformin N = 106Control N = 128  All HER2-22% (13%-31%)16% (10%-23%)89%33%HR+/HER2-14% (4%-24%)12% (4%-19%)66%21%HR-/HER2-32% (17%-46%)21% (11%-32%)91%51%

Conclusion: The I-SPY 2 adaptive randomization study estimates the probability that investigational regimens will be successful in a phase 3 neoadjuvant trial. The value of I-SPY 2 is to give insight about the performance of an investigational agent's likelihood of achieving pCR. For Ganitumab/metformin, no subtype came close to the efficacy threshold of 85% likelihood of success in phase 3, and this regimen does not appear to impact upfront reduction of tumor burden. Our data do not support its continued development for the neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Citation Format: Yee D, Paoloni M, van't Veer L, Sanil A, Yau C, Forero A, Chien AJ, Wallace AM, Moulder S, Albain KS, Kaplan HG, Elias AD, Haley BB, Boughey JC, Kemmer KA, Korde LA, Isaacs C, Minton S, Nanda R, DeMichele A, Lang JE, Buxton MB, Hylton NM, Symmans WF, Lyandres J, Hogarth M, Perlmutter J, Esserman LJ, Berry DA. The evaluation of ganitumab/metformin plus standard neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-04.

Abstract P6-11-02: Efficacy of Hsp90 inhibitor ganetespib plus standard neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 trial

Background:Pathologic complete response(pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy is an established prognostic biomarker for high-risk breast cancer(BC). Improving pCR rates may identify new therapies that improve survival. I-SPY 2 uses response-adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes to evaluate novel agents when added to standard neoadjuvant therapy for women with high-risk stage II/III breast cancer; the goal is to identify regimens that have ≥85% Bayesian predictive probability of success (statistical significance) in a 300-patient phase 3 neoadjuvant trial defined by hormone-receptor (HR), HER2 status and MammaPrint (MP). We report the results for Ganetespib, a selective inhibitor of Hsp90 that induces the degradation/deactivation of key drivers of tumor initiation, progression, angiogenesis, and metastasis.Ganetespib + taxanes previously have resulted in a superior therapeutic response compared to monotherapy in multiple solid tumor models including BC.

Methods:Women with tumors ≥2.5cm were eligible for screening and participation. MP low/HR+ tumors were ineligible for randomization. QTcF &gt;470msec and HbA1C &gt;8.0% were ineligible. MRI scans (baseline, +3 cycles, following weekly paclitaxel, T, and pre-surgery) were used in a longitudinal statistical model to improve the efficiency of adaptive randomization. Ganetespib was given with weekly T at 150 mg/m2 IV weekly (3 weeks on, 1 off). Patients were premedicated (dexamethasone 10mg and diphenhydramine HCl 25-50 mg, or therapeutic equivalents). Analysis was intention to treat with patients who switched to non-protocol therapy counted as non-pCRs. The Ganetespib regimen was open only to HER2- patients, and eligible for graduation in 3 of 10 pre-defined signatures: HER2-, HR+/HER2- and HR-/HER2-.

Results:Ganetespib did not meet the criteria for graduation in the 3 signatures tested. When the maximum sample size was reached, accrual stopped. Ganetespib was assigned to 93 patients; there were 140 controls. We report probabilities of superiority for Ganetespib over control and Bayesian predictive probabilities of success in a neoadjuvant phase 3 trial equally randomized between Ganetespib and control, for the 3 biomarker signatures, using the final pCR data from all patients. Safety data will be presented.

SignatureEstimated pCR Rate (95% probability interval)Probability Ganetespib Is Superior to ControlPredictive Probability of Ganetespib Success in a Phase 3 Trial Ganetespib N = 93Control N = 140  All HER2-26% (16%-37%)18% (8%-28%)91%47%HR+/HER2-15% (4%-27%)14% (4%-24%)60%19%HR-/HER2-38% (23%-53%)22% (9%-35%)96%72%

Conclusion:The I-SPY 2 adaptive randomization model efficiently evaluates investigational agents in the setting of neoadjuvant BC. The value of I-SPY 2 is that it provides insight as to the regimen's likelihood of success in a phase 3 neoadjuvant study. Although no signature reached the efficacy threshold of 85% likelihood of success in phase 3, we observed the most impact in HR-/HER2- patients, with a 16% improvement in pCR rate. While our data do not support the continued development of Ganetespib alone for neoadjuvant BC, combinations with Ganetespib, which could potentiate its effect, may be worth pursuing in I-SPY 2 or similar trials.

Citation Format: Forero A, Yee D, Buxton MB, Symmans WF, Chien AJ, Boughey JC, Elias AD, DeMichele A, Moulder S, Minton S, Kaplan HG, Albain KS, Wallace AM, Haley BB, Isaacs C, Korde LA, Nanda R, Lang JE, Kemmer KA, Hylton NM, Paoloni M, van't Veer L, Lyandres J, Perlmutter J, Hogarth M, Yau C, Sanil A, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Efficacy of Hsp90 inhibitor ganetespib plus standard neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-02.

Abstract S5-07: Aromatase inhibitors and endothelial function: Is there an association with early cardiovascular disease?

Background: As more women are cured from their breast cancer, survivors with early stage breast cancer are at greater risk of dying from cardiovascular disease than their breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) have been shown to reduce breast cancer-related mortality in women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease which makes up 75% of all breast cancer cases. The use of AIs has been associated with higher rates of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, angina pectoris and ischemic cardiovascular disease. In the aging population taking AIs, little is known about the direct impact of AIs on endothelial function, a predictor of cardiovascular disease. Endothelial dysfunction identified by reactive hyperemia using Endo-PAT has been associated with an increased risk of cardiac adverse events, independent of Framingham risk score.

Methods: At the University of Minnesota in 2014-2015, 25 healthy postmenopausal women and 36 postmenopausal women with locally advanced breast cancer and prescribed an aromatase inhibitor were identified. Subjects with a history of hypertension or hyperlipidemia were excluded. Consented subjects underwent biomarker analysis and pulse wave analysis using the HDI/Pulse Wave CR-2000 Cardiovascular Profiling System and pulse contour analysis using the Endo-PAT2000 system. Biomarkers and functional test markers were compared between cases and controls using T-tests and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests.

Results: Mean age (61.7 vs 58.8 years), body mass index (27.4 vs 26.2 kg/m2), race (93% vs 92% Caucasian), and tobacco use (100% nonsmokers) were similar between cases and controls, respectively. Mean systolic blood pressure (BP) was elevated in cases (128.3 mmHg vs 114.5 mmHg, p=0.0006). There were no differences in lipid profiles. Median ultrasensitive estradiol levels were reduced in cases (2 vs 15 pg/mL, p&lt;0.0001). Median high sensitive C-reactive protein was significantly elevated in cases (4146 vs 1406 ng/L, p=0.05). There were no differences seen in markers of hemostasis or endothelial damage, including circulating endothelial cells, vascular cell adhesion molecule, P-selectin. Median large artery elasticity (12.5 vs 15.1 ml/mmHg, p=0.02), small artery elasticity (5.2 vs 6.7 ml/mmHg, p=0.04), and endoPAT ratio (0.8 vs 2.6, p&lt;0.0001) were significantly reduced in breast cancer survivors on AIs as compared to controls. There was no correlation between use of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, type of AI, or duration of AI use and endothelial function among the cases. When adjusting for differences in BP, endoPAT ratio continued to remain significantly decreased in breast cancer survivors (0.8 vs 2.6, p&lt;0.0001).

Conclusion: Postmenopausal women with breast cancer on AIs have reductions in endothelial function, a predictor of adverse cardiovascular disease (acute coronary syndrome, chest pain, myocardial infarction, cardiac death). With the growing trend that longer duration of endocrine therapy is needed, further work is needed to confirm these findings.

Citation Format: Blaes AH, Beckwith H, Hebbel R, Solovey A, Potter D, Yee D, Vogel R, Luepker R, Duprez D. Aromatase inhibitors and endothelial function: Is there an association with early cardiovascular disease? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S5-07.

Abstract P3-05-02: Quantitative ERα measurements in TNBC from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL correlate with HER2-EGFR co-activation and heterodimerization

Background: We have previously described that TNBC patients whose tumors have both HER2 Y1248 phosphorylation (pHER2) “high” and phospho-EGFR Y1173 (pEGFR) “high” have increased response (pCR) to neratinib in the I-SPY2 TRIAL. We hypothesize that the paradoxical finding of a response prediction signature comprised of HER2 activation in a HER2 IHC/FISH-negative population means there must be a ligand-driven biochemical event responsible for the HER2 phosphorylation because HER2 mutations were also not found to be significant. Exploratory analysis of additional cellular signaling events and protein expression levels in pre-treatment, LCM-purified tumor epithelium by reverse phase protein microarray (RPPA) included semi-quantitative measurement of total levels of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), which has been previously shown to be able to act as a membrane non-genomic signaling molecule through direct interaction with various tyrosine kinases including EGFR and HER2. Since ERα has been previously shown to act as a ligand and co-stimulate (activate) HER2 and EGFR when present at low levels, we investigated whether or not RPPA-measured ERα levels in the TNBC cohort analyzed to date were higher in tumors with both pHER2 “high” and pEGFR “high” levels and thus provide evidence explaining how HER2-EGFR activation is occurring in TNBC.

Methods: Using RPPA analysis, we measured 118 analytes in lysates of LCM tumor epithelium obtained from the pre-treatment biopsy samples of 86 TNBC (Allred=0) patients in the I-SPY2 TRIAL analyzed to date. Cutpoints for pEGFR and pHER2 were determined previously by ROC analysis for pCR correlation in the neratinib treated TNBC population, and used here to dichotomize the pHER2 and pEGFR data in the larger TNBC population. Wilcoxon Rank Sum testing was performed using the continuous variable total ERα data and compared the TNBC that were both pHER2 and pEGFR “high” (N=39) to the rest of the TNBC population (N=47). Total ERα values were then divided into “high” and “low” groups based on the TNBC population median value in order to determine frequency/percentages within each class. Our study is exploratory with no claims for generalizability of the data, and calculations are descriptive (e.g. p-values are measures of distance with no inferential content).

Results: Total ERα values were obtained in 84/86 TNBC tumors analyzed. Total levels of ERα were higher (p&lt; 0.006) in TNBC tumors with pHER2 and pEGFR “high” levels. 68% (26/38) of tumors in the pHER2 and pEGFR “high” group had ERα levels above the population median compared to 35% (16/46) in the rest of the TNBC population.

Conclusion: Our exploratory analysis reveals that ERα levels are significantly higher in TNBC with pHER2 and pEGFR activation and may be behaving as a direct signaling ligand in TNBC and driving HER2-EGFR signaling. This ERα-pHER2/pEGFR association was missed by current ER and HER2 clinical laboratory testing techniques, and if validated in larger independent study sets could suggest that utilization of new protein-based techniques defining ER more quantitatively could be helpful to understand tumor biology and therapeutic response prediction, especially in the context of TNBC that are ostensibly ER negative.

Citation Format: Gallagher RI, Yau C, Wolf DM, Dong T, Hirst G, Brown-Swigart L, ISPY-2 TRIAL Investigators, Buxton M, DeMichele A, van't Veer L, Yee D, Paoloni M, Esserman L, Berry D, Park J, Petricoin EF, Wulfkuhle JD. Quantitative ERα measurements in TNBC from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL correlate with HER2-EGFR co-activation and heterodimerization [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-02.

Abstract P2-11-02: A longitudinal look at toxicity management within a platform trial: Lessons from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL

Background: I-SPY 2 is a multicenter, phase 2 trial using response-adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes to evaluate a series of investigational agents or regimens when added to standard neoadjuvant therapy for women with high-risk stage II/III breast cancer - investigational agent (I) +paclitaxel (T) qwk, doxorubicin & cyclophosphamide (AC) q2-3 wk x 4 vs. T+/-HP/AC (control arm(s)). Although the primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR) at surgery, a key secondary aim is to evaluate the toxicity profiles of these investigational agents. Distinct aspects of safety monitoring in a platform trial, as well as the specificities of safety management in a potentially curative population make the experiences from I-SPY 2 valuable to the community.

Methods: Inclusion and exclusion criteria are uniformly applied to all women in I-SPY 2. When a new investigational agent/regimen is planned for the trial, agent specific laboratory/hematologic limits or additional required tests are added, as needed. Eligibility criteria remain in the trial for its duration and apply to all investigational and control arms. Laboratory and adverse event data are collected and monitored in real time. The lead investigator of the investigational agent/regimen who chaperones a specific agent/regimen through the trial (“Agent Chaperone”), Medical Monitor, I-SPY 2 Agents Committee, CRO safety group, and an active DSMB that meets monthly oversee the management of toxicities within each investigational agent/regimen of the trial. Toxicity profiles for an investigational agent/regimen are compared to their relevant control. Safety analyses are intention to treat.

Results: From March 2010-May 2016, eleven (11) investigational agents/regimens have opened (and 6 have completed evaluation) and 973 women have been randomized. These agents/regimens span a variety of mechanisms of action including targeted therapies such as small molecule inhibitors and antibodies, as well as immunotherapies. Additions to the trial's eligibility criteria have been made with new investigational arms. Adverse events of special interest have been monitored for each investigational arm and specific toxicities treated uniformly when applicable. A risk-based monitoring plan has been implemented that focuses on the collection and review of the trial's most critical data elements including serious adverse events and drug specific safety issues, allowing for a more efficient and focused effort. Safety issues have been quickly addressed and requirements updated, when needed, given the importance of limiting (or avoiding) long-term safety complications within this neoadjuvant patient population. Accrual to the trial has (been) maintained over time and the safety of trial participants has been well managed.

Conclusion: A platform trial requires an evolving, and focused safety-monitoring process that adapts as new investigational agents are included. I-SPY 2's infrastructure and team science approach has created a system to manage patients across multiple arms with different risk profiles. These practices will support the safe evaluation of additional new combinations and regimens and serves as a guide for safety management within standing platform trials.

Citation Format: Paoloni M, Lyandres J, Buxton MB, Berry DA, Esserman LJ, DeMichele A, Yee D. A longitudinal look at toxicity management within a platform trial: Lessons from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-02.

Abstract P5-11-18: Trajectory of patient (Pt) reported physical function (PF) during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the I-SPY 2 trial

Background

Patients (pts) receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer experience toxicities impacting short and long-term quality of life (QOL). Within I-SPY 2, a trial adaptively randomizing stage II/III breast cancer pts to neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- an investigational agent, we are collecting pt reported outcome (PRO) data to understand the impact of investigational agents on QOL. This PRO sub-study provides a unique opportunity to study QOL longitudinally and explore how pt and tumor characteristics, exposure to investigational therapies, and surgical outcome impact QOL.

Methods

Pts enrolled in this trial receive paclitaxel (T) +/- an investigational agent for 12 weeks followed by 4 cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). Surveys include the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR-23, and PROMIS measures for QOL metrics including but not limited to physical function (PF), anxiety, and depression. Surveys are administered pre-chemotherapy to 2 years post-surgery. PF data from the EORTC and PROMIS instruments was analyzed for 238 pts at 5 sites (UCSF, UCSD, U of Pennsylvania, U of Minnesota, and Swedish Cancer Center). 48 pts completed baseline, inter-regimen (between T and AC), pre-operative and post-surgery surveys. Of the 48 pts 32 completed a 6-month follow up (FUP) and 31 completed a 1-year FUP survey. A linear mixed effect model, adjusting for HER2 status and treatment type was used to evaluate changes in PF over time. Sample size is small and statistics are descriptive rather than inferential.

Results

Median age of pts in this analysis was 50 (range 27-72).

Table 1 shows PROMIS & EORTC PF scores in this cohort.Time Point  PROMISEORTC  nMeanSEMeanSEPre-TreatmentAll4852.51.092.02.0 HER2+1553.51.594.12.2 HER2-3352.11.391.12.8Inter-RegimenAll4845.51.282.22.7 HER2+1548.62.384.44.2 HER2-3344.11.381.23.4Pre-SurgeryAll4843.91.179.42.3 HER2+1545.12.275.34.1 HER2-3343.41.381.32.86-Month FUPAll3248.11.487.41.9 HER2+1247.52.285.03.3 HER2-2048.41.888.92.41 Year FUPAll3148.91.488.43.1 HER2+949.12.988.95.4 HER2-2248.81.788.33.8

At baseline, mean PROMIS PF scores were higher than the US average (mean = 50) but declined as expected throughout treatment. HER2+ patients experienced a similar degree of recovery as HER2- pts post-surgery despite adjuvant treatment with Herceptin. Analysis of post-operative PROMIS PF indicated an average score within the U.S. general population (mean =50) but did not return to higher functioning seen at baseline levels (mean 52.5, p-value &lt; 0.05). Analysis of the EORTC PF sub-scale demonstrated a similar trend; however, the baseline and post-operative difference was not significant (p-value=0.15 for both FUP). Finding supports PROMIS PF ability to measure high functioning cancer patients.

Conclusions: Among a subset of pts who completed all surveys in the I-SPY 2 QOL substudy, PF did not return to baseline at 6-12 months post-operatively. Through transition to an electronic platform of data collection we hope to improve compliance with survey completion. We continue to analyze other QOL measures and plan to correlate QOL data with treatment arm, adverse events, comorbidities, and response to neoadjuvant treatment.

Citation Format: Shah M, Jensen R, Yau C, Straehley I, Berry DA, DeMichele A, Buxton MB, Hylton NM, Perlmutter J, Symmans WF, Tripathy D, Yee D, Wallace A, Kaplan HG, Clark A, Chien AJ, I-SPY 2 Investigators, Esserman LJ, Melisko ME. Trajectory of patient (Pt) reported physical function (PF) during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the I-SPY 2 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-18.

Intraoperative factors associated with stranded source placement accuracy in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The quality of a low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy implant depends on the accurate placement of sources in their planned locations. This study investigates intraoperative factors that potentially contribute to stranded source placement inaccuracy in prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Intraoperative video images of the brachytherapist's hand motions and needle insertions during the implant procedure were acquired for analysis. Using video analysis software, maximum and average needle insertion velocities were determined. The number of needle insertion attempts and the use of the brachytherapist's other hand to manipulate the needle direction were also recorded. Sources misplacements were analyzed using an ultrasound-based method described elsewhere.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients agreed to undergo this study; 1619 ¹²⁵I seeds were inserted using 357 needles; 1197 seeds were confidently identified using ultrasound images and included in the analysis. The mean overall misplacement was 0.49 cm (0-2 cm, 95% CI = 0.47-0.51); 614 seeds were delivered with a single pass and 583 seeds with >1 passes (range 2-6). The mean maximum needle velocity was 12.34 cm s^-1 (range 4-28 cm s^-1) and mean average velocity was 4.76 cm s^-1 (range 0.4-17.4 cm s^-1); 747 seeds were delivered with manipulation of the needle. The generalized linear model test was used to analyze factors contributing to seed misplacement, and it was found that a maximum speed <12 cm s^-1 was associated with a decrease in seed misplacement by 0.049 cm vs. a maximum speed >12 cm s^-1, p = 0.0121). Other evaluated factors were found to have no statistically significant correlation with seed misplacement: average speed (p = 0.4947), manual manipulation of needle (p = 0.9264), and number of needle passes (p = 0.8907).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified that needles inserted with lower maximum velocity were associated with less seed misplacement. Manual manipulation of the needle, number of passes, and average speed did not show statistically significant correlation with seed misplacement.

Abstract P1-14-03: The evaluation of trebananib plus standard neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL

Background: I-SPY 2 is a multicenter phase 2 trial using response-adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes to evaluate a series of novel agents when added to standard neoadjuvant therapy for women with high-risk stage II/III breast cancer. The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). The goal is to identify/graduate regimens with ≥85% Bayesian predictive probability of success (statistical significance) in a 300-patient phase 3 neoadjuvant trial defined by hormone-receptor (HR), HER2 status & MammaPrint (MP). Regimens may also leave the trial for futility (&lt; 10% probability of success) or following accrual of maximum sample size (10%&lt; probability of success &lt;85%). We report the results for trebananib, an angiopoietin-1/2-neutralizing peptibody that inhibits interaction with the Tie2 receptor.

Methods: Women with tumors ≥2.5cm were eligible for screening. MP low/HR+/HER2- tumors were ineligible for randomization. Serial MRI scans (baseline, 2 during treatment and pre-surgery) were used in a longitudinal model to improve the efficiency of adaptive randomization. Participants are categorized into 8 subtypes based on: HR status, HER2 status and MP High 1 (MP1) or High 2 (MP2). MP1 and MP2 are determined by a predefined median cut-point of I-SPY 1 participants who fit the eligibility criteria for I-SPY 2. Trebananib was initially assigned to HER2- patients only; once safety data with trastuzumab (H) were obtained, it was also assigned to HER2+ patients. Analysis was intent to treat -- patients who switched to non-protocol therapy were designated non-pCRs.

Results: Trebananib +/-H did not meet the criteria for graduation in any of the 10 signatures tested. When the maximum sample size was reached, accrual ceased. We report probabilities of trebananib +/-H being superior to control and Bayesian predictive probabilities of success in a 1:1 randomized neoadjuvant phase 3 trial for the 10 biomarker signatures, using the final pCR data from all patients.

SignatureEstimated pCR Rate (95% probability interval)Probability Trebananib Is Superior to ControlPredictive Probability of Success in Phase 3Trebananib (n=134)Control (n=133)ALL0.259(0.16 -0.36)0.158(0.09-0.23)0.9860.564HR+0.157(0.05-0.26)0.115(0.03- 0.20)0.8050.281HR-0.378(0.22-0.53)0.207(0.11- 0.31)0.9910.784HER2+0.279(0.07-0.49)0.17(0.04-0.30)0.8790.553HER2-0.254(0.15-0.36)0.155(0.08-0.23)0.9810.555MP20.342 (0.19-0.49)0.177(0.07-0.28)0.9910.786HR-/HER2-0.368 (0.21-0.53)0.201(0.10-0.30)0.9880.771HR-/HER2+0.444(0.15-0.74)0.244(0.07-0.42)0.9260.739HR+/HER2+0.201(0.01-0.39)0.135(0.01-0.26)0.7750.41HR+/HER2-0.143(0.04-0.24)0.11(0.03-0.19)0.7580.248

Citation Format: Albain KS, Leyland-Jones B, Symmans F, Paoloni M, van 't Veer L, DeMichele A, Buxton M, Hylton N, Yee D, Lyandres Clennell J, Yau C, Sanil A, I-SPY 2 Trial Investigators, Berry D, Esserman L. The evaluation of trebananib plus standard neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-03.

Abstract ES9-1: Role for IGF/Insulin signaling in breast cancer

Because insulin regulates glucose homeostasis, there has been extensive study into the molecular mechanisms of action of the insulin signaling system. Besides insulin, additional ligands, insulin-like growth factor (IGF) – I and –II and specific receptors for these ligands regulate cellular biology. The receptors share a similar structure and function. Once ligand binds the extracellular domain, a conformational change occurs allowing autophosphorylation of the intracellular tyrosine kinase domains and subsequent activation of multiple signaling pathways that ultimately result in cellular glucose uptake. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) results from deficient insulin receptor (InsR) signaling and subsequent elevation of serum glucose with compensatory attempt at regulating this pathophysiology by increased insulin production by the pancreas. While the etiology of T2D is complex and multi-factorial, obesity and insulin resistance are epidemiologically and mechanistically linked. Insulin was one of the first peptide growth factors known to stimulate breast cancer proliferation. Epidemiological data link obesity, metabolic syndrome (hyperinsulinemia), and elevated levels of IGFs to breast cancer risk and poor outcome for women diagnosed with breast cancer. These data, in part, led to the development of multiple targeted therapies for breast cancer. Receptor targeting of IGF-receptor signaling was not successful in hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancers possibly because drugs designed to target this receptor disrupted the negative feedback of this endocrine system and resulted in the elevation of serum insulin levels. Since InsR was not affected by anti-IGF receptor drugs, the potential that InsR was stimulated by these drug treatments could explain their failure. In contrast to receptor targeting strategies, the inhibition of downstream signaling pathways, such as mTORC1, have been successful in HR-positive breast cancer. Preclinical and clinical data have revealed complex intracellular and endocrine feedback pathways that affect the ability of any single targeted drug to effectively disrupt signals from this ligand-receptor family. This session will discuss combination strategies based on clinical and preclinical studies that could translate into effective drug therapies to disrupt this signaling system.

Citation Format: Yee D. Role for IGF/Insulin signaling in breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr ES9-1.

Abstract P3-08-03: Mobile phone multimedia messaging intervention for breast cancer screening

Background. Korean American women have one of the highest breast cancer mortality rates and lowest breast cancer screening rates among American women. In response to the need to enhance breast cancer screening, this study aims to develop and test a 7-day mobile phone application (app)-based Mammogram (mMammogram) intervention designed to promote breast cancer screening among Korean American women. To date, mobile app technology has not been used for mammogram promotion.

Methods. Using FBM Model, we developed a mammogram intervention designed to increase knowledge of breast cancer screening, intent to receive mammogram, and the receipt of a mammogram. A series of focus groups were conducted to inform the development of the intervention. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with baseline, one week post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up testing among 120 Korean American women who were aged 40 and older and had not had mammograms within the last 2 years. The intervention group (60) received an individually and culturally tailored text messages via mobile app with health navigation services. The control group (60) received a brochure including information on breast cancer, screening guidelines, and a list of clinics that offer low-cost or free mammography without health navigation services.

Results. At one week post-test, statistically significant between-group differences were found; intervention subjects reported higher scores of knowledge in breast cancer and screening guideline than subjects in control group (mean differences: 1.70, p &lt; 0.05). No statistical between group differences identified in intention to receive screening. However, significant between-group difference was found in the receipt of mammogram at 6-month follow-up test; 40.0% (24/60) of the intervention group received mammograms whereas 25.0% (15/60) of the brochure group received mammograms after intervention (p &lt; 0.05). 100% of the participants expressed satisfaction with the intervention and 98.3% reported that they would recommend the program to their friends.

Conclusions. This study provides evidence of the effectiveness and feasibility of the mammogram intervention with health navigation services in promoting breast cancer screening. Mobile application-based intervention is a promising tool to increase both knowledge and receipt of mammograms. Given the widespread usage of mobile phone among minority populations, a mobile phone-based health intervention could be an effective method of reaching hard-to-recruit populations with high breast cancer burden, using individually tailored messages that cover broad content areas and overcome restrictions to place and time of delivery.

Citation Format: Lee HY, Le C, Ghebre R, Yee D. Mobile phone multimedia messaging intervention for breast cancer screening. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-03.

Abstract S4-07: Tamoxifen resistance driven by the DNA cytosine deaminase APOBEC3B in recurrent estrogen receptor positive breast cancer

Recent studies have implicated the DNA cytosine deaminase APOBEC3B as a major source of mutation in breast cancer. APOBEC3B explains a large proportion of both dispersed and clustered cytosine mutations, the latter of which are also called kataegis. APOBEC3B expression levels correlate with poor outcomes for patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. While targeted therapies, such as tamoxifen, are available to treat these tumors, secondary drug resistance often develops. Here we suppressed endogenous APOBEC3B in the estrogen receptor positive breast cell line MCF-7L with shRNA. Lowered levels of APOBEC3B did not affect in vitro growth or sensitivity to estradiol. In a xenograft model of tamoxifen therapy, suppression of APOBEC3B associated with prolonged responses to tamoxifen (p&lt;0.05). Furthermore, APOBEC3B over-expression did not affect in vitro cell growth but accelerated the development of tamoxifen-resistant tumors in vivo. In addition, we studied two separate cohorts of 285 breast cancer patients who received first line treatment with tamoxifen for recurrent disease. High APOBEC3B expression levels measured in the primary tumor associated significantly with unfavorable progression free survival in multivariate analysis that included the traditional predictive factors (age, dominant relapse site, disease-free interval, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, and adjuvant chemotherapy; HR=1.67, p=0.0001). The median period of progression free survival was 7.5 months for patients with APOBEC3B high primary tumors and 13.3 months for those with APOBEC3B low tumors (p&lt;0.0.0001). These studies demonstrate that APOBEC3B drives resistance to endocrine treatment with tamoxifen in recurrent disease.

Citation Format: Harris R, Law E, Sieuwerts A, LaPara K, Leonard B, Starrett G, Temiz NA, Sweep F, Span P, Foekens J, Martens J, Yee D. Tamoxifen resistance driven by the DNA cytosine deaminase APOBEC3B in recurrent estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S4-07.

Abstract PD2-07: Insulin receptor substrate (IRS) targeting by the tyrophostin NT157 inhibits breast cancer cell growth

Insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling systems regulate the malignant phenotype. However, targeting of the type I IGF receptor (IGF-IR) has shown little activity in clinical trials. One potential reason for these disappointing results is that activation of the closely related insulin receptor (InR) could compensate for IGF-IR blockade. Since both receptors phosphorylate the insulin receptor substrates (IRS), perhaps a better strategy would involving targeting of this key post-receptor protein. Two IRS proteins are expressed in breast cancer cells. IRS-1 is regulated by estradiol in breast cancer cell lines, while IRS-2 is the predominant IRS species in hormone receptor negative cells. NT157, a small-molecule tyrphostin, binds IGF-1R but does not affect receptor autophosphorylation. Instead, it downregulates IRS proteins in several model systems. In primary breast cancers, IRS-1 was positively correlated to ERα expression in the TCGA database. In ERα+ and basal-like breast cancer cell lines NT157 treatment suppressed IRS protein expression in a dose dependent manner. Short term exposure to NT157 treatment did not affect IGF-I, IGF-II, and insulin induced activation of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), but longer exposure resulted in inhibition of these signaling pathways. NT157 resulted in serine phosphorylation of IRS proteins and was dependent on MAPK activation. Serine phosphorylation resulted in disassociation between IRS proteins and their receptors resulting in IRS degradation. NT157 decreased S phase fraction, monolayer, and anchorage independent growth after IGF/insulin treatment in ERα+ breast cancer cells. NT157 downregulation of IRS protein expression also sensitized ERα+ breast cancer cells to rapamycin. Moreover, NT157 inhibited the growth of tamoxifen resistant ERα+ breast cancer cells. In the basal-like breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231), NT157 repressed the proliferation (G2/M abrogation) and migration through downregulation of IRS1/2 protein. Given that both IGF-IR and InR play a role in cancer biology, targeting of IRS adapter proteins could be a more effective inhibitory strategy compared to receptor-targeting approaches.

Citation Format: Yee D, Temiz NA, Levitzki A, Yang Y. Insulin receptor substrate (IRS) targeting by the tyrophostin NT157 inhibits breast cancer cell growth. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-07.

Estimation of Contaminant Loads from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to San Francisco Bay

Contaminant concentrations from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River watershed were determined in water samples mainly during flood flows in an ongoing effort to describe contaminant loads entering San Francisco Bay, CA, USA. Calculated PCB and total mercury loads during the 6-year observation period ranged between 3.9 and 19 kg/yr and 61 and 410 kg/yr, respectively. Long-term average PCB loads were estimated at 7.7 kg/yr and total mercury loads were estimated at 200 kg/yr. Also monitored were PAHs, PBDEs (two years of data), and dioxins/furans (one year of data) with average loads of 392, 11, and 0.15/0.014 (OCDD/OCDF) kg/yr, respectively. Organochlorine pesticide loads were estimated at 9.9 kg/yr (DDT), 1.6 kg/yr (chlordane), and 2.2 kg/yr (dieldrin). Selenium loads were estimated at 16 300 kg/yr. With the exception of selenium, all average contaminant loads described in the present study were close to or below regulatory load allocations established for North San Francisco Bay.