A multicenter, randomized phase 2 study to establish combinations of CBP501, cisplatin and nivolumab for ≥3rd-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is no standard of care for ≥ 3rd-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). CBP501 is a novel calmodulin-binding peptide that has been shown to enhance the influx of platinum agents into tumor cells and tumor immunogenicity. This study aimed to (1) confirm efficacy of CBP501/cisplatin/nivolumab for metastatic PDAC observed in a previous phase 1 study, (2) identify combinations that yield 35% 3-month progression-free survival rate (3MPFS) and (3) define the contribution of CBP501 to the effects of combination therapy.

METHODS

CBP501 16 or 25 mg/m2 (CBP(16) or CBP(25)) was combined with 60 mg/m2 cisplatin (CDDP) and 240 mg nivolumab (nivo), administered at 3-week intervals. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to (1) CBP(25)/CDDP/nivo, (2) CBP(16)/CDDP/nivo, (3) CBP(25)/CDDP and (4) CDDP/nivo, with randomization stratified by ECOG PS and liver metastases. A Fleming two-stage design was used, yielding a one-sided type I error rate of 2.5% and 80% power when the true 3MPFS is 35%.

RESULTS

Among 36 patients, 3MPFS was 44.4% in arms 1 and 2, 11.1% in arm 3% and 33.3% in arm 4. Two patients achieved a partial response in arm 1 (ORR 22.2%; none in other arms). Median PFS and OS were 2.4, 2.1, 1.5 and 1.5 months and 6.3, 5.3, 3.7 and 4.9 months, respectively. Overall, all treatment combinations were well tolerated. Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination CBP(25)/(16)/CDDP/nivo demonstrated promising signs of efficacy and a manageable safety profile for the treatment of advanced PDAC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04953962.

Ivermectin for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): An open, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial of short- and longer-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

The evidence for whether ivermectin impacts recovery, hospital admissions, and longer-term outcomes in COVID-19 is contested. The WHO recommends its use only in the context of clinical trials.

METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, multi-arm, adaptive platform randomised controlled trial, we included participants aged ≥18 years in the community, with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, and symptoms lasting ≤14 days. Participants were randomised to usual care, usual care plus ivermectin tablets (target 300-400 μg/kg per dose, once daily for 3 days), or usual care plus other interventions. Co-primary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery, and COVID-19 related hospitalisation/death within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. Recovery at 6 months was the primary, longer term outcome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN86534580.

FINDINGS

The primary analysis included 8811 SARS-CoV-2 positive participants (median symptom duration 5 days), randomised to ivermectin (n = 2157), usual care (n = 3256), and other treatments (n = 3398) from June 23, 2021 to July 1, 2022. Time to self-reported recovery was shorter in the ivermectin group compared with usual care (hazard ratio 1·15 [95% Bayesian credible interval, 1·07 to 1·23], median decrease 2.06 days [1·00 to 3·06]), probability of meaningful effect (pre-specified hazard ratio ≥1.2) 0·192). COVID-19-related hospitalisations/deaths (odds ratio 1·02 [0·63 to 1·62]; estimated percentage difference 0% [-1% to 0·6%]), serious adverse events (three and five respectively), and the proportion feeling fully recovered were similar in both groups at 6 months (74·3% and 71·2% respectively (RR = 1·05, [1·02 to 1·08]) and also at 3 and 12 months.

INTERPRETATION

Ivermectin for COVID-19 is unlikely to provide clinically meaningful improvement in recovery, hospital admissions, or longer-term outcomes. Further trials of ivermectin for SARS-Cov-2 infection in vaccinated community populations appear unwarranted.

FUNDING

UKRI/National Institute of Health Research (MC_PC_19079).

Adaptive multi-interventional trial platform to improve patient care for fibrotic interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND

Fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (fILDs) are a heterogeneous group of lung diseases associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite a large increase in the number of clinical trials in the last 10 years, current regulatory-approved management approaches are limited to two therapies that prevent the progression of fibrosis. The drug development pipeline is long and there is an urgent need to accelerate this process. This manuscript introduces the concept and design of an innovative research approach to drug development in fILD: a global Randomised Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform in fILD (REMAP-ILD).

METHODS

Description of the REMAP-ILD concept and design: the specific terminology, design characteristics (multifactorial, adaptive features, statistical approach), target population, interventions, outcomes, mission and values, and organisational structure.

RESULTS

The target population will be adult patients with fILD, and the primary outcome will be a disease progression model incorporating forced vital capacity and mortality over 12 months. Responsive adaptive randomisation, prespecified thresholds for success and futility will be used to assess the effectiveness and safety of interventions. REMAP-ILD embraces the core values of diversity, equity, and inclusion for patients and researchers, and prioritises an open-science approach to data sharing and dissemination of results.

CONCLUSION

By using an innovative and efficient adaptive multi-interventional trial platform design, we aim to accelerate and improve care for patients with fILD. Through worldwide collaboration, novel analytical methodology and pragmatic trial delivery, REMAP-ILD aims to overcome major limitations associated with conventional randomised controlled trial approaches to rapidly improve the care of people living with fILD.

Single cell spatial analysis reveals inflammatory foci of immature neutrophil and CD8 T cells in COVID-19 lungs

Single cell spatial interrogation of the immune-structural interactions in COVID -19 lungs is challenging, mainly because of the marked cellular infiltrate and architecturally distorted microstructure. To address this, we develop a suite of mathematical tools to search for statistically significant co-locations amongst immune and structural cells identified using 37-plex imaging mass cytometry. This unbiased method reveals a cellular map interleaved with an inflammatory network of immature neutrophils, cytotoxic CD8 T cells, megakaryocytes and monocytes co-located with regenerating alveolar progenitors and endothelium. Of note, a highly active cluster of immature neutrophils and CD8 T cells, is found spatially linked with alveolar progenitor cells, and temporally with the diffuse alveolar damage stage. These findings offer further insights into how immune cells interact in the lungs of severe COVID-19 disease. We provide our pipeline [Spatial Omics Oxford Pipeline (SpOOx)] and visual-analytical tool, Multi-Dimensional Viewer (MDV) software, as a resource for spatial analysis.

Adopting human factors in early phase and experimental medicine research: A nested pilot study observing controlled human infection with SARS-CoV-2

AIMS

The influence of human factors on safety in healthcare settings is well established, with targeted interventions reducing risk and enhancing team performance. In experimental and early phase clinical research participant safety is paramount and safeguarded by guidelines, protocolized care and staff training; however, the real-world interaction and implementation of these risk-mitigating measures has never been subjected to formal system-based assessment.

METHODS

Independent structured observations, systematic review of study documents, and interviews and focus groups were used to collate data on three key tasks undertaken in a clinical research facility (CRF) during a SARS CoV-2 controlled human infection model (CHIM) study. The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) was employed to analyse and categorize findings, and develop recommendations for safety interventions.

RESULTS

High levels of team functioning and a clear focus on participant safety were evident throughout the study. Despite this, latent risks in both study-specific and CRF work systems were identified in all four SEIPS domains (people, environment, tasks and tools). Fourteen actionable recommendations were generated collaboratively. These included inter-organization and inter-study standardization, optimized checklists for safety critical tasks, and use of simulation for team training and exploration of work systems.

CONCLUSIONS

This pioneering application of human factors techniques to analyse work systems during the conduct of research in a CRF revealed risks unidentified by routine review and appraisal, and despite international guideline adherence. SEIPS may aid categorization of system problems and the formulation of recommendations that reduce risk and mitigate potential harm applicable across a trials portfolio.

Optimising psoriatic arthritis therapy with immunological methods to increase standard evaluation: the protocol of an open-label multicentre, parallel-group, two-arm randomised controlled study evaluation precision medicine approach in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) affects around 150 000 people in the UK of whom around 50% require treatment with biologics. The most used biologics for PsA target tumour necrosis factor (TNF) or interleukin-17A (IL-17A). About 50% of patients respond to each, but it is not currently possible to predict response for individual patients, necessitating sequential treatment steps. A recent proof of concept study in PsA suggested that using peripheral immunophenotype to choose therapy could improve time to treatment response.This study will test the hypothesis, within an open-label parallel-group biomarker-stratified multicentre randomised controlled trial, which the baseline proportion of CD4+T cells with an activated type 17 immunophenotype (Th17 levels) predicts response to IL-17A or TNF inhibitors in PsA. Additional analyses will identify if the model can be refined by combining additional clinical and immunophenotypic factors. Statistical modelling will be used to predict the likely effectiveness of these approaches compared with standard care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patients with PsA eligible to start their first biologic as part of standard care are recruited and baseline blood tests are taken for immunophenotyping. Participants are stratified equally by Th17 levels and randomised 1:1 to receive either TNF (adalimumab) or IL-17A (secukinumab) inhibitors. The primary analysis will establish the interaction between baseline immunophenotype and treatment on the primary outcome (achievement of minimal disease activity criteria at week 24). In secondary analysis, modelling will identify if this prediction model can be optimised further by incorporating clinical phenotypes and additional immunophenotyping techniques.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for the study was granted by the North West Preston Research Ethics Committee (ref 21/NW/0016). Dissemination will be via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications, aiming to impact on treatment guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN17228602.

Platform adaptive trial of novel antivirals for early treatment of COVID-19 In the community (PANORAMIC): protocol for a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial of community novel antiviral treatment of COVID-19 in people at increased risk of more severe disease

INTRODUCTION

There is an urgent need to determine the safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of novel antiviral treatments for COVID-19 in vaccinated patients in the community at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PANORAMIC is a UK-wide, open-label, prospective, adaptive, multiarm platform, randomised clinical trial that evaluates antiviral treatments for COVID-19 in the community. A master protocol governs the addition of new antiviral treatments as they become available, and the introduction and cessation of existing interventions via interim analyses. The first two interventions to be evaluated are molnupiravir (Lagevrio) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

community-dwelling within 5 days of onset of symptomatic COVID-19 (confirmed by PCR or lateral flow test), and either (1) aged 50 years and over, or (2) aged 18-49 years with qualifying comorbidities. Registration occurs via the trial website and by telephone. Recruitment occurs remotely through the central trial team, or in person through clinical sites. Participants are randomised to receive either usual care or a trial drug plus usual care. Outcomes are collected via a participant-completed daily electronic symptom diary for 28 days post randomisation. Participants and/or their Trial Partner are contacted by the research team after days 7, 14 and 28 if the diary is not completed, or if the participant is unable to access the diary. The primary efficacy endpoint is all-cause, non-elective hospitalisation and/or death within 28 days of randomisation. Multiple prespecified interim analyses allow interventions to be stopped for futility or superiority based on prespecified decision criteria. A prospective economic evaluation is embedded within the trial.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval granted by South Central-Berkshire REC number: 21/SC/0393; IRAS project ID: 1004274. Results will be presented to policymakers and at conferences, and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN30448031; EudraCT number: 2021-005748-31.

In vivo human keyhole limpet hemocyanin challenge in early phase drug development: A systematic review

Experimental exposure of healthy volunteers to the T-cell dependent neoantigen keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) permits the evaluation of immunomodulatory investigational medicinal product (IMP) pharmacology prior to the recruitment of patient populations. Despite widespread use, no standardized approach to the design and conduct of such studies has been agreed. The objective of this systematic review was to survey the published literature where KLH was used as a challenge agent, describing methodology, therapeutic targets addressed, and pharmacodynamic outcome measures. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies using KLH challenge in humans between January 1, 1994, and April 1, 2022. We described key study features, including KLH formulation, dose, use of adjuvants, route of administration, co-administered IMPs, and end points. Of 2421 titles and abstracts screened, 46 met the inclusion criteria, including 14 (31%) early phase trials of IMP, of which 10 (71%) targeted T-cell co-stimulation. IMPs with diverse mechanisms demonstrated modulation of the humoral response to KLH, suggesting limited specificity of this end point. Two early phase IMP studies (14%) described the response to intradermal re-challenge (delayed type hypersensitivity). Challenge regimens for IMP assessment were often incompletely described, and exhibited marked heterogeneity, including primary KLH dose (25-fold variation: 100-2500 mcg), KLH formulation, and co-administration with adjuvants. Methodological heterogeneity and failure to exploit the access to tissue-level mechanism-relevant end points afforded by KLH challenge has impaired the translational utility of this paradigm to date. Future standardization, characterization, and methodological development is required to permit tailored, appropriately powered, mechanism-dependent study design to optimize drug development decisions.

Search for Subsolar-Mass Binaries in the First Half of Advanced LIGO's and Advanced Virgo's Third Observing Run

We report on a search for compact binary coalescences where at least one binary component has a mass between 0.2  M_{⊙} and 1.0  M_{⊙} in Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo data collected between 1 April 2019 1500 UTC and 1 October 2019 1500 UTC. We extend our previous analyses in two main ways: we include data from the Virgo detector and we allow for more unequal mass systems, with mass ratio q≥0.1. We do not report any gravitational-wave candidates. The most significant trigger has a false alarm rate of 0.14  yr^{-1}. This implies an upper limit on the merger rate of subsolar binaries in the range [220-24200]  Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, depending on the chirp mass of the binary. We use this upper limit to derive astrophysical constraints on two phenomenological models that could produce subsolar-mass compact objects. One is an isotropic distribution of equal-mass primordial black holes. Using this model, we find that the fraction of dark matter in primordial black holes in the mass range 0.2  M_{⊙}<m_{PBH}<1.0  M_{⊙} is f_{PBH}≡Ω_{PBH}/Ω_{DM}≲6%. This improves existing constraints on primordial black hole abundance by a factor of ∼3. The other is a dissipative dark matter model, in which fermionic dark matter can collapse and form black holes. The upper limit on the fraction of dark matter black holes depends on the minimum mass of the black holes that can be formed: the most constraining result is obtained at M_{min}=1  M_{⊙}, where f_{DBH}≡Ω_{DBH}/Ω_{DM}≲0.003%. These are the first constraints placed on dissipative dark models by subsolar-mass analyses.

An observational, non-interventional study for the follow-up of patients with amyloidosis who received miridesap followed by dezamizumab in a phase 1 study

Background

Miridesap depletes circulating serum amyloid P (SAP) and dezamizumab (anti-SAP monoclonal antibody) targets SAP on amyloid deposits, triggering amyloid removal. In a phase 1, first-in-human study (FIHS), progressive amyloid removal was observed in some patients after ≤ 3 cycles of miridesap/dezamizumab.

Methods

This observational, non-interventional study in patients who received miridesap/dezamizumab during the FIHS (planned follow-up: 5 years) evaluated response to treatment based on routine assessments of disease status and key organ function. In a post hoc analysis, patients responding to treatment in the FIHS during follow-up were identified as responders and further categorized as sustained or declining responders.

Results

In the FIHS, 17/23 patients were treatment responders. Of these patients, seven (immunoglobulin light chain [AL], n = 6; serum amyloid A, n = 1) were considered sustained responders and ten (fibrinogen-a alpha chain [AFib], n = 5; AL, n = 4; apolipoprotein A-I, n = 1) were considered declining responders. We primarily present responder patient-level data for functional, cardiac, laboratory and imaging assessments conducted during the follow-up period, with non-responder data presented as supplementary.

Conclusion

No further development of miridesap/dezamizumab is planned in amyloidosis. However, long-term follow-up of these patients may provide insight into whether active removal of amyloid deposits has an impact on disease progression.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01777243. Registered 28 January 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01777243.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-022-02405-7.

Colchicine for COVID-19 in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial

BACKGROUND

Colchicine has been proposed as a COVID-19 treatment.

AIM

To determine whether colchicine reduces time to recovery and COVID-19-related admissions to hospital and/or deaths among people in the community.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, multicentre, open-label, multi-arm, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial (PRINCIPLE).

METHOD

Adults aged ≥65 years or ≥18 years with comorbidities or shortness of breath, and unwell for ≤14 days with suspected COVID-19 in the community, were randomised to usual care, usual care plus colchicine (500 µg daily for 14 days), or usual care plus other interventions. The co-primary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery and admission to hospital/death related to COVID-19, within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models.

RESULTS

The trial opened on 2 April 2020. Randomisation to colchicine started on 4 March 2021 and stopped on 26 May 2021 because the prespecified time to recovery futility criterion was met. The primary analysis model included 2755 participants who were SARS-CoV-2 positive, randomised to colchicine (n = 156), usual care (n = 1145), and other treatments (n = 1454). Time to first self-reported recovery was similar in the colchicine group compared with usual care with an estimated hazard ratio of 0.92 (95% credible interval (CrI) = 0.72 to 1.16) and an estimated increase of 1.4 days in median time to self-reported recovery for colchicine versus usual care. The probability of meaningful benefit in time to recovery was very low at 1.8%. COVID-19-related admissions to hospital/deaths were similar in the colchicine group versus usual care, with an estimated odds ratio of 0.76 (95% CrI = 0.28 to 1.89) and an estimated difference of -0.4% (95% CrI = -2.7 to 2.4).

CONCLUSION

Colchicine did not improve time to recovery in people at higher risk of complications with COVID-19 in the community.

Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial

BACKGROUND

Dysregulated inflammation is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the efficacy of namilumab (a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor inhibitor) and infliximab (a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, to prioritise agents for phase 3 trials.

METHODS

In this randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, parallel-group, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial (CATALYST), we recruited patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations of 40 mg/L or greater, at nine hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned with equal probability to usual care or usual care plus a single intravenous dose of namilumab (150 mg) or infliximab (5 mg/kg). Randomisation was stratified by care location within the hospital (ward vs intensive care unit [ICU]). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was improvement in inflammation, measured by CRP concentration over time, analysed using Bayesian multilevel models. This trial is now complete and is registered with ISRCTN, 40580903.

FINDINGS

Between June 15, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021, we screened 299 patients and 146 were enrolled and randomly assigned to usual care (n=54), namilumab (n=57), or infliximab (n=35). For the primary outcome, 45 patients in the usual care group were compared with 52 in the namilumab group, and 29 in the usual care group were compared with 28 in the infliximab group. The probabilities that the interventions were superior to usual care alone in reducing CRP concentration over time were 97% for namilumab and 15% for infliximab; the point estimates for treatment-time interactions were -0·09 (95% CI -0·19 to 0·00) for namilumab and 0·06 (-0·05 to 0·17) for infliximab. 134 adverse events occurred in 30 (55%) of 55 patients in the namilumab group compared with 145 in 29 (54%) of 54 in the usual care group. 102 adverse events occurred in 20 (69%) of 29 patients in the infliximab group compared with 112 in 17 (50%) of 34 in the usual care group. Death occurred in six (11%) patients in the namilumab group compared with ten (19%) in the usual care group, and in four (14%) in the infliximab group compared with five (15%) in the usual care group.

INTERPRETATION

Namilumab, but not infliximab, showed proof-of-concept evidence for reduction in inflammation-as measured by CRP concentration-in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Namilumab should be prioritised for further investigation in COVID-19.

FUNDING

Medical Research Council.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study

BACKGROUND

In a Phase I study treatment with the serum amyloid P component (SAP) depleter miridesap followed by monoclonal antibody to SAP (dezamizumab) showed removal of amyloid from liver, spleen and kidney in patients with systemic amyloidosis. We report results from a Phase 2 study and concurrent immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) study assessing efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety and cardiac uptake (of dezamizumab) following the same intervention in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.

METHODS

Both were uncontrolled open-label studies. After SAP depletion with miridesap, patients received ≤ 6 monthly doses of dezamizumab in the Phase 2 trial (n = 7), ≤ 2 doses of non-radiolabelled dezamizumab plus [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab (total mass dose of 80 mg at session 1 and 500 mg at session 2) in the immuno-PET study (n = 2). Primary endpoints of the Phase 2 study were changed from baseline to follow-up (at 8 weeks) in left ventricular mass (LVM) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and safety. Primary endpoint of the immuno-PET study was [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab cardiac uptake assessed via PET.

RESULTS

Dezamizumab produced no appreciable or consistent reduction in LVM nor improvement in cardiac function in the Phase 2 study. In the immuno-PET study, measurable cardiac uptake of [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab, although seen in both patients, was moderate to low. Uptake was notably lower in the patient with higher LVM. Treatment-associated rash with cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis was observed in both studies. Abdominal large-vessel vasculitis after initial dezamizumab dosing (300 mg) occurred in the first patient with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis enrolled in the Phase 2 study. Symptom resolution was nearly complete within 24 h of intravenous methylprednisolone and dezamizumab discontinuation; abdominal computed tomography imaging showed vasculitis resolution by 8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike previous observations of visceral amyloid reduction, there was no appreciable evidence of amyloid removal in patients with cardiac amyloidosis in this Phase 2 trial, potentially related to limited cardiac uptake of dezamizumab as demonstrated in the immuno-PET study. The benefit-risk assessment for dezamizumab in cardiac amyloidosis was considered unfavourable after the incidence of large-vessel vasculitis and development for this indication was terminated. Trial registration NCT03044353 (2 February 2017) and NCT03417830 (25 January 2018).

CATALYST trial protocol: a multicentre, open-label, phase II, multiarm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults

INTRODUCTION

Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a dysregulated immune response. Inflammatory monocytes and macrophages are crucial, promoting injurious, proinflammatory sequelae. Immunomodulation is, therefore, an attractive therapeutic strategy and we sought to test licensed and novel candidate drugs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The CATALYST trial is a multiarm, open-label, multicentre, phase II platform trial designed to identify candidate novel treatments to improve outcomes of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 compared with usual care. Treatments with evidence of biomarker improvements will be put forward for larger-scale testing by current national phase III platform trials. Hospitalised patients >16 years with a clinical picture strongly suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (confirmed by chest X-ray or CT scan, with or without a positive reverse transcription PCR assay) and a C reactive protein (CRP) ≥40 mg/L are eligible. The primary outcome measure is CRP, measured serially from admission to day 14, hospital discharge or death. Secondary outcomes include the WHO Clinical Progression Improvement Scale as a principal efficacy assessment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol was approved by the East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (20/EM/0115) and given urgent public health status; initial approval was received on 5 May 2020, current protocol version (V.6.0) approval on 12 October 2020. The MHRA also approved all protocol versions. The results of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

EudraCT2020-001684-89, ISRCTN40580903.

Azithromycin versus standard care in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (ATOMIC2): an open-label, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral properties of azithromycin suggest therapeutic potential against COVID-19. Randomised data in mild-to-moderate disease are not available. We assessed whether azithromycin is effective in reducing hospital admission in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, randomised superiority trial was done at 19 hospitals in the UK. We enrolled adults aged at least 18 years presenting to hospitals with clinically diagnosed, highly probable or confirmed COVID-19 infection, with fewer than 14 days of symptoms, who were considered suitable for initial ambulatory management. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to azithromycin (500 mg once daily orally for 14 days) plus standard care or to standard care alone. The primary outcome was death or hospital admission from any cause over the 28 days from randomisation. The primary and safety outcomes were assessed according to the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04381962) and recruitment is closed.

FINDINGS

298 participants were enrolled from June 3, 2020, to Jan 29, 2021. Three participants withdrew consent and requested removal of all data, and three further participants withdrew consent after randomisation, thus, the primary outcome was assessed in 292 participants (145 in the azithromycin group and 147 in the standard care group). The mean age of the participants was 45·9 years (SD 14·9). 15 (10%) participants in the azithromycin group and 17 (12%) in the standard care group were admitted to hospital or died during the study (adjusted OR 0·91 [95% CI 0·43-1·92], p=0·80). No serious adverse events were reported.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 managed without hospital admission, adding azithromycin to standard care treatment did not reduce the risk of subsequent hospital admission or death. Our findings do not support the use of azithromycin in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Pfizer.

Inhaled budesonide for COVID-19 in people at high risk of complications in the community in the UK (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial

BACKGROUND

A previous efficacy trial found benefit from inhaled budesonide for COVID-19 in patients not admitted to hospital, but effectiveness in high-risk individuals is unknown. We aimed to establish whether inhaled budesonide reduces time to recovery and COVID-19-related hospital admissions or deaths among people at high risk of complications in the community.

METHODS

PRINCIPLE is a multicentre, open-label, multi-arm, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial done remotely from a central trial site and at primary care centres in the UK. Eligible participants were aged 65 years or older or 50 years or older with comorbidities, and unwell for up to 14 days with suspected COVID-19 but not admitted to hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to usual care, usual care plus inhaled budesonide (800 μg twice daily for 14 days), or usual care plus other interventions, and followed up for 28 days. Participants were aware of group assignment. The coprimary endpoints are time to first self-reported recovery and hospital admission or death related to COVID-19, within 28 days, analysed using Bayesian models. The primary analysis population included all eligible SARS-CoV-2-positive participants randomly assigned to budesonide, usual care, and other interventions, from the start of the platform trial until the budesonide group was closed. This trial is registered at the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN86534580) and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

The trial began enrolment on April 2, 2020, with randomisation to budesonide from Nov 27, 2020, until March 31, 2021, when the prespecified time to recovery superiority criterion was met. 4700 participants were randomly assigned to budesonide (n=1073), usual care alone (n=1988), or other treatments (n=1639). The primary analysis model includes 2530 SARS-CoV-2-positive participants, with 787 in the budesonide group, 1069 in the usual care group, and 974 receiving other treatments. There was a benefit in time to first self-reported recovery of an estimated 2·94 days (95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI] 1·19 to 5·12) in the budesonide group versus the usual care group (11·8 days [95% BCI 10·0 to 14·1] vs 14·7 days [12·3 to 18·0]; hazard ratio 1·21 [95% BCI 1·08 to 1·36]), with a probability of superiority greater than 0·999, meeting the prespecified superiority threshold of 0·99. For the hospital admission or death outcome, the estimated rate was 6·8% (95% BCI 4·1 to 10·2) in the budesonide group versus 8·8% (5·5 to 12·7) in the usual care group (estimated absolute difference 2·0% [95% BCI -0·2 to 4·5]; odds ratio 0·75 [95% BCI 0·55 to 1·03]), with a probability of superiority 0·963, below the prespecified superiority threshold of 0·975. Two participants in the budesonide group and four in the usual care group had serious adverse events (hospital admissions unrelated to COVID-19).

INTERPRETATION

Inhaled budesonide improves time to recovery, with a chance of also reducing hospital admissions or deaths (although our results did not meet the superiority threshold), in people with COVID-19 in the community who are at higher risk of complications.

FUNDING

National Institute of Health Research and United Kingdom Research Innovation.

Base of thumb osteoarthritis in UK interface services-a cohort and survey-based study to assess current practice

Objective

Base of thumb OA (BTOA) is a common age-related disease that has a significant negative impact on quality of life, while little is known about the structure and pathways of interface services. Our aim was to assess disease burden, referral pathways, service structure and management pathways in UK interface services.

Methods

A structured questionnaire was carried out with a participating clinician at each centre to detail the local guidelines and management of BTOA. Five patients referred with BTOA were prospectively identified in each of 32 UK interface centres.

Results

Most centres (72%) had a local guideline and a standardized treatment regime consisting of education (100%), joint protection (100%), range of motion exercises (84%), strengthening exercises (88%), splintage (100%) and use of assistive devices (78%). No centre routinely offered a steroid injection at the first appointment and no centre had a specific threshold for offering an injection. Injection delivery was variable. Most patients had not been referred previously (82%). Most patients used analgesia (72%), but a minority of patients had been treated with a splint (46%), therapy (43%) and steroid injection (27%) prior to their latest attendance.

Conclusion

Most BTOA patients newly referred to interface services have been treated with analgesics and have not received comprehensive multimodal intervention. The management of BTOA at interface services is standardized in terms of education, splintage and therapy. However, there is a lack of standardization in terms of both the threshold for, timing of and mode of delivery of injection therapy.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in children and adolescents: Clinical features and treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND

Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes in children and adolescents with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 are not well characterized.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 80 patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 who commenced tumor surveillance at ≤18 years of age.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (70%) developed an endocrine tumor by age ≤18 years (median age = 14 years, range = 6-18 years). Primary hyperparathyroidism occurred in >80% of patients, with >70% undergoing parathyroidectomy, in which less-than-subtotal (<3-gland) resection resulted in decreased disease-free outcomes versus subtotal (3-3.5-gland) or total (4-gland) parathyroidectomy (median 27 months versus not reached; P = .005). Pancreaticoduodenal neuroendocrine tumors developed in ∼35% of patients, of whom >70% had nonfunctioning tumors, >35% had insulinomas, and <5% had gastrinomas, with ∼15% having metastases and >55% undergoing surgery. Pituitary tumors developed in >30% of patients, and ∼35% were macroprolactinomas. Tumor occurrence in male patients and female patients was not significantly different. Genetic analyses revealed 38 germline MEN1 mutations, of which 3 were novel.

CONCLUSION

Seventy percent of children aged ≤18 years with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 develop endocrine tumors, which include parathyroid tumors for which less-than-subtotal parathyroidectomy should be avoided; pancreaticoduodenal neuroendocrine tumors that may metastasize; and pituitary macroprolactinomas.

Clinical validation of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test using an independent validation set

BACKGROUND

A multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test used to complement existing screening could increase the number of cancers detected through population screening, potentially improving clinical outcomes. The Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study (CCGA; NCT02889978) was a prospective, case-controlled, observational study and demonstrated that a blood-based MCED test utilizing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing in combination with machine learning could detect cancer signals across multiple cancer types and predict cancer signal origin (CSO) with high accuracy. The objective of this third and final CCGA substudy was to validate an MCED test version further refined for use as a screening tool.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This pre-specified substudy included 4077 participants in an independent validation set (cancer: n = 2823; non-cancer: n = 1254, non-cancer status confirmed at year-one follow-up). Specificity, sensitivity, and CSO prediction accuracy were measured.

RESULTS

Specificity for cancer signal detection was 99.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 99.0% to 99.8%]. Overall sensitivity for cancer signal detection was 51.5% (49.6% to 53.3%); sensitivity increased with stage [stage I: 16.8% (14.5% to 19.5%), stage II: 40.4% (36.8% to 44.1%), stage III: 77.0% (73.4% to 80.3%), stage IV: 90.1% (87.5% to 92.2%)]. Stage I-III sensitivity was 67.6% (64.4% to 70.6%) in 12 pre-specified cancers that account for approximately two-thirds of annual USA cancer deaths and was 40.7% (38.7% to 42.9%) in all cancers. Cancer signals were detected across >50 cancer types. Overall accuracy of CSO prediction in true positives was 88.7% (87.0% to 90.2%).

CONCLUSION

In this pre-specified, large-scale, clinical validation substudy, the MCED test demonstrated high specificity and accuracy of CSO prediction and detected cancer signals across a wide diversity of cancers. These results support the feasibility of this blood-based MCED test as a complement to existing single-cancer screening tests.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT02889978.

Role of age, gender and marital status in prognosis for adults with depression: An individual patient data meta-analysis

AIMS

To determine whether age, gender and marital status are associated with prognosis for adults with depression who sought treatment in primary care.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central were searched from inception to 1st December 2020 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults seeking treatment for depression from their general practitioners, that used the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule so that there was uniformity in the measurement of clinical prognostic factors, and that reported on age, gender and marital status. Individual participant data were gathered from all nine eligible RCTs (N = 4864). Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to ascertain the independent association between: (i) age, (ii) gender and (iii) marital status, and depressive symptoms at 3-4, 6-8, and 9-12 months post-baseline and remission at 3-4 months. Risk of bias was evaluated using QUIPS and quality was assessed using GRADE. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019129512. Pre-registered protocol https://osf.io/e5zup/.

RESULTS

There was no evidence of an association between age and prognosis before or after adjusting for depressive 'disorder characteristics' that are associated with prognosis (symptom severity, durations of depression and anxiety, comorbid panic disorderand a history of antidepressant treatment). Difference in mean depressive symptom score at 3-4 months post-baseline per-5-year increase in age = 0(95% CI: -0.02 to 0.02). There was no evidence for a difference in prognoses for men and women at 3-4 months or 9-12 months post-baseline, but men had worse prognoses at 6-8 months (percentage difference in depressive symptoms for men compared to women: 15.08% (95% CI: 4.82 to 26.35)). However, this was largely driven by a single study that contributed data at 6-8 months and not the other time points. Further, there was little evidence for an association after adjusting for depressive 'disorder characteristics' and employment status (12.23% (-1.69 to 28.12)). Participants that were either single (percentage difference in depressive symptoms for single participants: 9.25% (95% CI: 2.78 to 16.13) or no longer married (8.02% (95% CI: 1.31 to 15.18)) had worse prognoses than those that were married, even after adjusting for depressive 'disorder characteristics' and all available confounders.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians and researchers will continue to routinely record age and gender, but despite their importance for incidence and prevalence of depression, they appear to offer little information regarding prognosis. Patients that are single or no longer married may be expected to have slightly worse prognoses than those that are married. Ensuring this is recorded routinely alongside depressive 'disorder characteristics' in clinic may be important.

Nurses' and physicians' experiences with diabetes consultations and the use of dialogue tools in the DiaPROM pilot trial: A qualitative study

AIM

To explore nurses' and physicians' experiences with diabetes consultations in general and the use of dialogue tools in the Diabetes Patient-Related Outcome Measures (DiaPROM) pilot trial.

METHODS

We used a qualitative explorative design by conducting semi-structured in-depth interviews with five nurses and nine physicians engaged in the DiaPROM pilot trial. The pilot trial aimed to test an intervention utilizing the patient-reported Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) scale and person-centred communication skills as dialogue tools in clinical consultations with adults with type 1 diabetes. We used thematic analysis to analyse the data.

RESULTS

We generated three themes (each including two subthemes) from the analysis of participants' experiences: (1) 'Conflicting demands and priorities' (subthemes: 'Balancing guideline recommendations with patients' main concerns' and 'Experiencing that patients need more support to disclose their emotional concerns'); (2) 'Insights about using dialogue tools' (subthemes: 'The benefits and challenges of using the PAID as a dialogue tool' and 'Communication techniques are helpful'); and (3) 'Facilitating new interventions is challenging' (subthemes: 'Unclear roles and responsibilities in the multidisciplinary teamwork' and 'The capacity sets the limit, not the willingness').

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the physicians and nurses experienced substantial challenges related to time and resources in the use of dialogue tools to support people's emotional concerns in clinical diabetes consultations. Thus, there is a need for healthcare organizations to adjust priorities to focus on the emotional burden of diabetes if the multidisciplinary diabetes teams are to successfully integrate psychosocial support into routine diabetes care.

The Potential for Repurposing Anti-TNF as a Therapy for the Treatment of COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) currently has few effective treatments. Given the uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness and uptake of a vaccine, it is important that the search for treatments continue. An exaggerated inflammatory state is likely responsible for much of the morbidity and mortality in COVID-19. Elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), a key pro-inflammatory cytokine, have been shown to be associated with increased COVID-19 mortality. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, TNF blockade reduces not only biologically active TNF but other pro-inflammatory cytokines important in COVID-19 hyperinflammation. Observational data from patients already on anti-TNF therapy show a reduced rate of COVID-19 poor outcomes and death compared with other immune-suppressing therapies. Anti-TNF has a long history of safe use, including in special at-risk populations, and is widely available. The case to adequately assess anti-TNF as a treatment for COVID-19 is compelling.

Cardiac magnetic resonance derived left atrial function after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an important prognostic indicator

Background

The prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived left atrial (LA) strain, ejection fraction (LAEF) and volumes (LAVImax and LAVImin) after STEMI is controversial.

Aim

To assess the relationship between LA function and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within 2 years after STEMI.

Methods

We prospectively recruited 213 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent CMR at median day 4. 202 patients had complete CMR data for feature tracking assessment. LA reservoir and booster strain were quantified by one blinded observer based on the average of three independently repeated measurements from two- and four-chamber views. MACE was a composite of all-cause mortality, reinfarction, new or worsening heart failure, stroke and sustained ventricular arrhythmias.

Results

The cohort included 174 (86.1%) males, median age 56 years (IQR 50–65 years). MACE occurred in 35 (17.3%) patients. Patients with MACE had lower median reservoir strain (18.9 vs 29.4%, p&lt;0.001), booster strain (9.4 vs 13.0%, p=0.002) and LAEF (41.5 vs 49.2%, p&lt;0.001), and higher LAVImax (43.5 vs 38.6ml/m2, p=0.019) and LAVImin (23.7 vs 19.3ml/m2, p&lt;0.001) than patients without MACE. Patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≤40%) had lower median reservoir strain (22.5 vs 30.1%, p&lt;0.001), booster strain (11.3 vs 12.9%, p=0.021) and LAEF (43.3 vs 50.3%, p&lt;0.001) than patients with LVEF&gt;40%. AUC analyses showed reservoir strain (AUC 0.769; 95% CI 0.676–0.861, p&lt;0.001), booster strain (AUC 0.684; 95% CI 0.558–0.810, p=0.002) and LAEF (AUC 0.698; 95% CI 0.596–0.800, p&lt;0.001) predicted MACE. Kaplan Meier analyses showed a difference in MACE between high- and low-risk groups for reservoir strain (cutoff 21%, p&lt;0.001), booster strain (cutoff 9.6%, p&lt;0.001) and LAEF (cutoff 41%, p&lt;0.001). Univariate Cox regression analyses showed all LA parameters had a significant effect on MACE, while multivariate analyses found additional prognostic utility using reservoir strain.

Conclusion

LA reservoir strain provided incremental prognostic value beyond established clinical and CMR parameters for predicting MACE after STEMI.

Kaplan Meier analyses

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

A multi-centre open-label two-arm randomised superiority clinical trial of azithromycin versus usual care in ambulatory COVID-19: study protocol for the ATOMIC2 trial

Background

Azithromycin is an orally active synthetic macrolide antibiotic with a wide range of anti-bacterial, anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties. It is a safe, inexpensive, generic licenced drug available worldwide and manufactured to scale and is a potential candidate therapy for pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Azithromycin was widely used to treat severe SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, but to date, no randomised data are available in any coronavirus infections.

Other ongoing trials are exploring short courses of azithromycin either in early disease, within the first 7 days of symptoms, when azithromycin’s antiviral properties may be important, or late in disease when anti-bacterial properties may reduce the risk of secondary bacterial infection. However, the molecule’s anti-inflammatory properties, including suppression of pulmonary macrophage-derived pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukins-1β, -6, -8, and -18 and cytokines G-CSF and GM-CSF may provide a distinct therapeutic benefit if given in as a prolonged course during the period of progression from moderate to severe disease.

Methods

ATOMIC2 is a phase II/III, multi-centre, prospective, open-label, two-arm randomised superiority clinical trial of azithromycin versus standard care for adults presenting to hospital with COVID-19 symptoms who are not admitted at initial presentation. We will enrol adults, ≥ 18 years of age assessed in acute hospitals in the UK with clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 infection where management on an ambulatory care pathway is deemed appropriate. Participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to usual care or to azithromycin 500 mg orally daily for 14 days with telephone follow-up at days 14 and 28. The primary objective is to compare the proportion with either death or respiratory failure requiring invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation over 28 days from randomisation. Secondary objectives include mortality/respiratory failure in those with a PCR-confirmed diagnosis; all-cause mortality; progression to pneumonia; progression to severe pneumonia; peak severity of illness and mechanistic analysis of blood and nasal biomarkers.

Discussion

This trial will determine the clinical utility of azithromycin in patients with moderately severe, clinically diagnosed COVID-19 and could be rapidly applicable worldwide.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04381962. Registered on 11 May 2020. EudraCT identifier 2020-001740-26. Opened for accrual on 29 May 2020.

OP0196-PARE #ARTHRITISATWORK: USING TWITTER TO ENGAGE THE INTERNATIONAL ARTHRITIS COMMUNITY

Background:

In 2019, EULAR launched the #Time2Work campaign [1] to raise awareness of the impact of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases on individuals, society, and the economy. Building on this theme, the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance (CAPA) developed a social media campaign and Twitter chat in collaboration with international patient advocates and organizations. The Twitter chat built upon CAPA’s successful development of workplace resources for people living with arthritis [2].

Objectives:

To deliver an international #ArthritisAtWork social media campaign on Twitter, in support of the #Time2Work campaign.

Methods:

A one-hour Twitter Chat was held on World Arthritis Day (October 12, 2019) on arthritis in the workplace (#ArthritisAtWork) from 18:00 to 19:00 UTC. The chat was hosted by CAPA and co-hosted by Simon Stones, a patient advocate from the United Kingdom (UK) and CreakyJoints, patient-driven arthritis organization in the United States (US). The Twitter Chat questions were co-developed in advance by the hosts, and blog posts were shared from CAPA’s website. Each host also promoted the Twitter Chat through their websites, newsletters and online communities. A social media analytical tool, Symplur, was used to measure audience engagement using the hashtag #ArthritisAtWork. In addition, pertinent Tweets before, during, and after the chat were obtained. The analysis of themes was undertaken to identify common issues and questions.

Results:

One hundred and ten users participated in the Twitter chat between 17:20 and 19:20 UTC. Participants included people living with arthritis, researchers, patient organizations, health information outlets and academic institutions. During this period, 565 tweets were shared between participants in Australia, Canada, Ireland, Spain, UK and US. There were 3.352 million Twitter impressions. This represents the number of times a tweet appears to users in either their timeline or search results. Emergent themes of the analysis include:

Conclusion:

The social media campaign was successful in reaching a diverse audience and supporting the #Time2Work campaign. Social media tools can provide an important social support for people living with arthritis as they navigate workplace challenges. It also offers a more contemporary platform to engage the international community on issues of common interest. Working together, internationally helps expand reach and reduce barriers in communication. Research can be conducted to measure potential behavior change that leverages digital social support for people living with arthritis.

References:

[1]EULAR (2019). Press release “EULAR launches Time2Work campaign to highlight the importance of keeping people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in work. Available from:https://www.eular.org/sysModules/obxContent/files/www.eular.2015/1_42291DEB-50E5-49AE-5726D0FAAA83A7D4/time2work_campaign_press_release_final.pdf2. CAPA (2019). Arthritis in the Workplace: Resources for Patients by Patients. Available from:http://arthritispatient.ca/arthritis-in-the-workplace-resources-for-patients-by-patients/

Disclosure of Interests:

Laurie Proulx Grant/research support from: Sources of grants and support received by the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance (including in-kind support) in the last two years include: AbbVie Canada, Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines, Amgen Canada, Arthritis Alliance of Canada, The Arthritis Society, Best Medicines Coalition, CADTH, Canadian Rheumatology Association, Eli Lilly Canada, European League Against Rheumatism, Janssen Canada, Manulife, Novartis Canada, Ontario Rheumatology Association, Pfizer Canada (including Pfizer Hospira), Purdue Pharma Canada, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma., Speakers bureau: I have provided speaking services to Sanofi and Eli Lilly. These engagements do not relate to this abstract., Simon Stones Consultant of: I have been a paid consultant for Envision Pharma Group and Parexel. This does not relate to this abstract., Speakers bureau: I have been a paid speaker for Actelion and Janssen. These do not relate to this abstract., Joseph Coe: None declared, Dawn Richards Grant/research support from: Sources of grants and support received by the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance (including in-kind support) in the last two years include: AbbVie Canada, Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines, Amgen Canada, Arthritis Alliance of Canada, The Arthritis Society, Best Medicines Coalition, CADTH, Canadian Rheumatology Association, Eli Lilly Canada, European League Against Rheumatism, Janssen Canada, Manulife, Novartis Canada, Ontario Rheumatology Association, Pfizer Canada (including Pfizer Hospira), Purdue Pharma Canada, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma., Consultant of: Dawn has done small consulting projects on patient engagement for companies., Speakers bureau: Dawn has been a paid speaker for several companies., Linda Wilhelm Grant/research support from: Sources of grants and support received by the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance (including in-kind support) in the last two years include: AbbVie Canada, Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines, Amgen Canada, Arthritis Alliance of Canada, The Arthritis Society, Best Medicines Coalition, CADTH, Canadian Rheumatology Association, Eli Lilly Canada, European League Against Rheumatism, Janssen Canada, Manulife, Novartis Canada, Ontario Rheumatology Association, Pfizer Canada (including Pfizer Hospira), Purdue Pharma Canada, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma., Nathalie Robertson Grant/research support from: Sources of grants and support received by the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance (including in-kind support) in the last two years include: AbbVie Canada, Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines, Amgen Canada, Arthritis Alliance of Canada, The Arthritis Society, Best Medicines Coalition, CADTH, Canadian Rheumatology Association, Eli Lilly Canada, European League Against Rheumatism, Janssen Canada, Manulife, Novartis Canada, Ontario Rheumatology Association, Pfizer Canada (including Pfizer Hospira), Purdue Pharma Canada, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma., Janet Gunderson Grant/research support from: Sources of grants and support received by the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance (including in-kind support) in the last two years include: AbbVie Canada, Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines, Amgen Canada, Arthritis Alliance of Canada, The Arthritis Society, Best Medicines Coalition, CADTH, Canadian Rheumatology Association, Eli Lilly Canada, European League Against Rheumatism, Janssen Canada, Manulife, Novartis Canada, Ontario Rheumatology Association, Pfizer Canada (including Pfizer Hospira), Purdue Pharma Canada, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma., Alexandra Sirois Grant/research support from: Sources of grants and support received by the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance (including in-kind support) in the last two years include: AbbVie Canada, Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines, Amgen Canada, Arthritis Alliance of Canada, The Arthritis Society, Best Medicines Coalition, CADTH, Canadian Rheumatology Association, Eli Lilly Canada, European League Against Rheumatism, Janssen Canada, Manulife, Novartis Canada, Ontario Rheumatology Association, Pfizer Canada (including Pfizer Hospira), Purdue Pharma Canada, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma., Annette McKinnon Grant/research support from: Sources of grants and support received by the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance (including in-kind support) in the last two years include: AbbVie Canada, Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines, Amgen Canada, Arthritis Alliance of Canada, The Arthritis Society, Best Medicines Coalition, CADTH, Canadian Rheumatology Association, Eli Lilly Canada, European League Against Rheumatism, Janssen Canada, Manulife, Novartis Canada, Ontario Rheumatology Association, Pfizer Canada (including Pfizer Hospira), Purdue Pharma Canada, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma.

AB0488 CAN A GCA RISK STRATIFICATION SCORE BE HELPFUL IN CLINICAL PRACTICE?

Background:

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common type of large vessel vasculitis. Typically it presents in patients over the age of 50 with a combination of temporal headaches, scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, raised inflammatory markers and visual disturbance. The diagnosis of GCA is often challenging and there is a difficult balance of over and under investigation. There have been several proposed scoring systems to help clinicians risk stratify patients who may present with suspected GCA. One such scoring system, published in 2017, showed clinical utility in a large international multi-centre study. Following analysis by logistic regression on data from 530 biopsies, Ing et al. developed a parsimonious prediction model comprising 5 candidate criteria: age, jaw claudication, ischemia-related loss of visual acuity, platelet count and logCRP (Figure 1).[1]

Objectives:

Increasingly, ultrasound doppler imaging is recognised and accepted as satisfactory means of confirming the diagnosis of GCA, with the presence of the halo sign characteristic for GCA. The aim of our study was to determine whether this GCA prediction model accurately predicts positive temporal artery biopsies in a large, real world UK cohort. In addition, we assessed whether this model accurately predicts positive temporal artery ultrasounds.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study was performed using electronic medical records of patients referred for temporal artery biopsy (TAB) and temporal artery ultrasound (USTA) for suspected GCA. All TAB performed at the Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust between June 2014 - June 2018 and all USTA performed between January 2015 - January 2019 were analysed. Patients who undergo USTA for suspected GCA at our centre routinely have bilateral temporal and axillary arteries scanned. Patients were excluded if they already had a previous diagnosis of GCA (and the clinical question was suspected flare), or if there was insufficient information available.

Results:

The total number of patients who underwent a confirmatory diagnostic test (either TAB or USTA) for suspected GCA was 187. Thirteen of these patients met the exclusion criteria, the remaining 174 patients were included for analysis. 126/174 patients underwent a TAB, 63/174 had an USTA. 15/174 had both these were included in the USS cohort because for all these patients the ultrasound was the first diagnostic test performed (Table 1). Our results appear to closely mirror the original multi-centre results with regards to prediction of biopsy positive GCA, with the centiles closely following those in the inception cohort. 0% of the ‘low’ risk probability biopsy cohort were misclassified - none had a positive biopsy. However, 8% of the ‘low’ risk probability ultrasound cohort were misclassified - 2 had a positive ultrasound.

Table 1.

Investigation outcome summary

Total number of patients who underwent TAB +/or USS TA for?GCA187 - 13 patients rejectedN = 174TAB = 111USS = 63Of these 15 patients hadbothUSS & TABPositive TAB =31 (28%)Negative TAB =80 (72%)Positive USS =24 (38%)Negative USS =39 (62%)

Conclusion:

Our study, highlights that a probability score for GCA derived from a large multi-centre cohort of patients who were biopsy positive, predicts ultrasound positivity with similar accuracy. Our work reveals that scoring systems are not infallible but can be helpful in guiding clinical decision making

References:

[1]Ing EB, Lahaie Luna G, Toren A, et al. Multivariable prediction model for suspected giant cell arteritis: development and validation.Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:2031–2042. Published 2017 Nov 22.

Acknowledgments:

Many thanks to the Rheumatology, Opthalmology & Ultrasound teams at Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Interlaboratory Study of a Thermospray-Liquid Chromatographic/Mass Spectrometric Method for Selected N-Methyl Carbamates, N-Methyl Carbamoyloximes, and Substituted Urea Pesticides

A thermospray-liquid chromatographic/mass spectrometric (TS-LC/MS) method was evaluated in an interlaboratory study for determining 3 N-methyl carbamates (bendiocarb, carbaryl, and carbofuran), 3 N-methyl carbamoyloximes (aldicarb, methomyl, and oxamyl), 2 substituted urea pesticides (diuron and linuron), and 1 ester of a substituted carbamic acid (carbendazim). The purpose of this study was to establish whether these 9 compounds can be reliably detected and quantitated with this method, and to establish the interlaboratory precision and accuracy of the method with currently available instrumentation. The study design was based on AOAC INTERNATIONAL’S blind replicate design with balanced replicates. The samples consisted of solutions of the 9 test compounds in methanol at 3 concentrations that were unknown to the participating laboratories and that covered the linear range of the method. Nine volunteer laboratories participated in the study. Linear regression equations are presented that calculate the accuracy of the method, i.e., the percent recovery of each of the 9 compounds at any concentration within the range of concentrations tested (5–90 (μg/mL for each compound, except carbendazim, for which the range was 1.25–22.5 μg/mL). The intra laboratory precisions of the TS-LC/MS method ranged from 6.5 to 33.1 % relative standard deviation, depending on the compound. The interlaboratory method precisions ranged from 29.8 to 98.2% relative standard deviation over the concentration range tested. Analysis of variance indicates that for all compounds tested, the variation from laboratory to laboratory is greater than that attributed to analytical error displayed within laboratories. There are many operational parameters that could contribute to interlaboratory variability; one of them, the thermospray tip temperature, can play a major role in adduct formation and ion fragmentation in the case of thermally labile carbamate pesticides and, therefore, needs to be monitored and controlled carefully. The correlation of mass spectral data with the thermospray tip temperature was attempted using principal component analysis.

P309 The use of echocardiographic parameters to predict clinical outcomes in AL-amyloidosis cardiomyopathy

Background

AL-amyloidosis has a rapid clinical progression, with cardiac involvement associated with a particularly poor prognosis. Cardiac amyloidosis is diagnosed by either invasive biopsy or conventional echocardiographic parameters such as increased wall thickness, in the absence of other causes. More recently, novel parameters including 2D longitudinal strain have demonstrated diagnostic utility in a range of infiltrative cardiomyopathies including cardiac amyloidosis.

Aim/Method: We sought to evaluate traditional and novel echocardiographic parameters in their ability to predict adverse outcomes in a cohort of AL-amyloid patients. 80 patients who had transthoracic echocardiograms at a single centre were included. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment was performed, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS), LV mass (indexed to BSA). The primary endpoint was a composite of of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality, that was assessed by interrogation of the medical records on a specified censor date.

Results

At a mean follow-up (time from echo to censor date) of 5.4 ± 2.6years, 38/80 (47.5%) of patients experienced the primary endpoint of MACE or death, of which 25/80 (31%) were deaths. LVEF (59 ± 5.6%vs56 ± 6.4%, p = 0.04), GLS (17.4 ± 3.9%vs14.8 ± 4.9%, p = 0.01) basal longitudinal strain (12.3 ± 3.2%vs9.6 ± 3.9%, p = 0.002), indexed LV mass (107 ± 36g/m2vs130 ± 34g/m2, p = 0.06) and E/E’ (13.7 ± 4.9vs20.6 ± 9.6, p &lt; 0.001) were all significantly different between patients who experienced the primary endpoint and those that didn’t. The strongest predictors of outcome were E/E’ (AUC 0.74), LV mass (AUC 0.73) and the ratio GLS:LV mass (AUC 0.73). An E/E’ of 15 had a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 69%, while an indexed LV mass of 108 had a sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 67% respectively. GLS to LV mass as a cutoff of 0.16 had a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 69% respectively.

Conclusion

In a cohort of 80 patients with AL-amyloid cardiomyopathy, almost half (47.5%) reached the primary composite endpoint. Diastolic dysfunction as expressed as E/E’, and LV mass were the most powerful predictors of outcome, while global longitudinal strain and LV basal strain were also reduced, and showed superiority over LV ejection fraction in predicting prognosis.

P1543 The assessment of regional myocardial strain in classifying amyloid cardiomyopathy

Background

An infiltrative cardiomyopathy is a common manifestation of AL-amyloidosis, with cardiac involvement associated with a poor prognosis. Wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (wt-TTR), is a distinct clinical entity occurring predominantly in men &gt; 65 yrs, that has gained interest recently due to novel treatment options. Regional strain analysis has been shown to discriminate both forms of cardiac amyloidosis from other causes of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, with a characteristic pattern of ‘apical sparing’. Due to the significant difference in both the course of the disease and treatment options between groups, a non-invasive echocardiographic method of determining subtype would be valuable.

Aim/Method: We sought to compare traditional and novel echocardiographic parameters in a cohort of AL ( n = 80) and wild type (wt-TTR) amyloid ( n = 32) patients. All amyloid patients underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, including both conventional parameters and LV longitudinal strain. Further novel parameters were computed including the ratio of global longitudinal strain (GLS) to LV ejection fraction (LVEF), as well as GLS to indexed LV mass.

Results

wt-TTR patients had significantly greater LV mass (176 ± 59g/m2vs118 ± 37g/m2, p &lt; 0.001), and worse diastolic dysfunction as expressed as E/E’ (21.5 ± 11vs17 ± 8, p = 0.04). LVEF was significantly lower in wt-TTR patients however remained in the normal range in both groups (53 ± 6%vs57 ± 6%, p = 0.001), whilst GLS was significantly reduced compared to AL-amyloid patients (11.5 ± 3.4%vs16.2 ± 4.6%, p &lt; 0.001). LVEF:GLS was significantly higher in wt-TTR patients (4.93 ± 1.4vs3.87 ± 1.3, p = 0.001) reflecting a more profound reduction in strain with a relatively preserved ejection fraction. Similarly, the ratio of GLS to LV mass was significantly lower in wt-TTR amyloidosis (0.078 ± 0.05vs0.155 ± 0.07, p &lt; 0.001), reflecting a more significant reduction in strain for a given wall thickness in wt-TTR patients. GLS:LV mass was the strongest discriminator between subtypes (AUC 0.82), with a cutoff of 0.09 giving a sensitivity and specificity of 71% and 80% respectively, for detecting wt-TTR.

Conclusion

In this cohort, patients with wt-TTR had significantly greater increase in LV wall thickness and diastolic dysfunction, which may in part reflect their increased age (77vs62). However, GLS was also significantly reduced compared to AL-amyloid, even when accounting for LV ejection fraction and LV mass, suggesting these composite parameters may have value in determining the subtype of cardiac amyloidosis.

Identification, preclinical profile, and clinical proof of concept of an orally bioavailable pro-drug of miridesap

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Miridesap, a depleter of serum amyloid P component (SAP), forms an essential component of a novel approach to remove systemic amyloid deposits; low oral bioavailability necessitates that it is given parenterally. We sought to identify and clinically characterise a pro-drug that preserves the pharmacological properties of miridesap while having adequate oral bioavailability and physical stability.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We utilised a preclinical screening cascade focused on appropriate physicochemical properties, physical and gut stability, and conversion to miridesap in liver microsomes and blood. GSK3039294 (GSK294) had the desired in vitro profile and progressed to preclinical in vivo pharmacokinetic and safety assessments. Based on a favourable profile, it was tested in healthy participants after single and repeat dosing.

KEY RESULTS

GSK294 was highly soluble and stable in simulated gastric and intestinal fluids, stable in intestinal microsomes, and permeable in Madine Darby Canine Kidney type II cells. GSK294 was rapidly hydrolysed to miridesap and its mono pro-drug ester in blood and liver microsomes. GSK294 showed good oral bioavailability of miridesap in rats and dogs. Following administration of GSK294 600 mg QD for 7 days in humans, pharmacodynamically active concentrations of miridesap were achieved with substantial and sustained depletion of plasma SAP. The study was terminated due to observations of arrhythmia, the relation of which to GSK294 remains unclear.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Using a preclinical screening cascade, we identified a pro-drug for a palindromic molecule with unique pharmacology (miridesap). The pro-drug depleted circulating SAP with a time course and extent similar to that of parenterally administered miridesap.

4938Left ventricular global longitudinal strain recovery predicts scar size reduction and systolic remodelling post ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Background

Left ventricular (LV) strain has prognostic utility following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, serial changes in LV strain has not been evaluated post-infarct. We sought to determine the relationship between post-STEMI transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging derived scar size and LV systolic remodelling.

Methods

Following revascularisation, 172 first STEMI patients (85% male, 56.9±10.7 years) had paired TTE for GLS, and CMR to evaluate scar size and LV systolic function at baseline (2–7 days) and follow-up (8–10 weeks). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to absolute baseline GLS: group 1 (GLS ≥16%), group 2 (12%< GLS <16%), group 3 (GLS ≤12%). GLS recovery was defined as ≥10% increase in GLS at follow-up, excluding patients with normal baseline GLS. LV systolic adverse remodelling was defined as ≥15% increase in LVESV. LV systolic reverse remodelling was defined as ≥15% decrease in LVESV. Scar reduction was defined as ≥30% decrease in scar size.

Results

Group 1 and 2 had smaller follow-up scar size and higher LVEF compared to group 3 (p<0.0001 for both, see table). There was no difference in scar size reduction or systolic reverse remodeling among the baseline GLS groups (p>0.05 for both). Importantly, no patients from group 1 demonstrated systolic adverse remodelling. Relative change in GLS is significantly correlated with changes in LVEF (r=0.354, p<0.0001) and scar size (r=−0.262, p<0.0001), see figure. On multivariate binary logistic analysis, patients who demonstrated GLS recovery had greater reduction in scar size (OR=2.77 (1.09–7.01), p=0.032) and LV systolic reverse remodelling (OR=9.63 (1.21–76.41), p=0.032).

Follow-up parameters within GLS groups All patients (n=172) Group 1 (n=47) Group 2 (n=72) Group 3 (n=53) Follow-up GLS, % 16.02±3.44 19.38±1.90 16.36±2.09 12.57±2.69 GLS recovery, n 110 (64%) 19 (40%) 53 (74%) 38 (72%) Follow-up scar size, % 7.67±5.40 5.01±3.38 6.27±3.73 12.02±6.24 Follow-up LVEF, % 51.80±10.20 57.83±6.95 54.14±8.02 43.26±9.83 Data presented as mean ± SD or n (%).

Correlation graphs for change in GLS

Conclusion

Stratification of STEMI patients by baseline GLS was a determinant of CMR scar size as well as LV systolic function. However, the evaluation of GLS recovery could provide additional insights into reduction in scar size and LV systolic remodelling, both important prognostic markers. Thus, echocardiographic serial GLS evaluation may be a relevant non-invasive parameter, that is cheaper and more widely available for monitoring STEMI patients and guiding therapy.

P1483Serial changes in peak left atrial strain predicts diastolic remodelling following percutaneous revascularisation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background

Echocardiographic 2D speckle tracking peak left atrial (LA) strain reflects LA reservoir function. Limited studies have reported the relationship between peak LA strain and diastolic dysfunction. In addition, adverse diastolic remodeling (ADR) has been reported, to have better prognostic value than single diastolic function assessment following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Purpose

We examined the relationship between serial changes in echocardiographic peak LA strain and diastolic function in STEMI patients.

Methods

186 percutaneously revascularized first presentation STEMI patients (87% male, 56.9±10.6 years) underwent serial TTE at baseline (2–7 days) and at follow-up (8–10 weeks) post-STEMI. Peak LA reservoir strain measurements were analysed from apical 2-, 3- and 4- chamber views. Diastolic function was graded as per 2016 guidelines: normal, grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3. ADR was defined as worsening of diastolic function grade (≥1) from baseline to follow-up, or persistent grade 3.

Results

Lower baseline peak LA strain was associated with grade 2 and grade 3 diastolic dysfunction compared to normal and grade 1 function at follow-up (p<0.05, see figure and table). Change in LA strain was less with worsening grades of diastolic function (see table). ADR was seen in 33 patients. Lower baseline peak LA strain predicted ADR (B=0.86 (0.80–0.92), p<0.0001). In addition, a reduction in peak LA strain at follow up was independently associated with ADR (B=0.91 (0.84–0.97), p=0.007) (see figure).

Diastolic function grades with LA strain Follow-up diastolic function Baseline peak LA strain (%) Follow-up peak LA strain (%) Change in peak LA strain (%) Normal (n=91) 35.70±6.38 40.97±8.10 5.26±6.07 Grade 1 (n=61) 30.70±6.97 34.54±8.77 3.84±6.32 Grade 2 (n=17) 23.95±6.11 25.49±5.93 1.54±4.70 Grade 3 (n=17) 23.66±8.07 23.49±10.64 −0.17±7.44 Data presented as mean ± SD.

Peak LA strain vs diastolic function

Conclusion

Peak LA strain is associated with diastolic function following STEMI and differentiates normal diastolic function from diastolic dysfunction. Serial changes in peak LA strain correlated with diastolic remodelling. Longer-term follow-up is required to determine the prognostic value of changes in peak LA strain, and diastolic remodelling.

Assessing the efficacy and acceptability of an internet-delivered intervention for resilience among college students: A pilot randomised control trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Exposure to new stressors places college students at increased risk for developing mental health problems. Preventive interventions aimed at enhancing resilience have the potential to improve mental health and well-being in college students and internet-delivery may improve access to these interventions. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of online interventions for resilience in college students. The present study seeks to assess the feasibility [initial efficacy and acceptability] of a newly developed internet-delivered intervention for resilience provided with human or automated support, in a sample of college students.

METHOD

A pilot randomised controlled trial including three groups: 1) an intervention group with human support; 2) an intervention group with automated support; and 3) a waiting list control group. The intervention, Space for Resilience, is based on positive psychology and consists of seven modules, delivered over a period of eight weeks. Primary outcomes measures will include the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and the Pemberton Happiness Index (PHI). Secondary outcomes measures will include the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), the Patient Health Questionnaire - 4 items (PHQ-4), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), and the Perceived Stress Scale - 4 items (PSS-4). Acceptability will be examined using the Satisfaction with Treatment (SAT) questionnaire. Analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis.

DISCUSSION

The study seeks to establish the initial efficacy and acceptability of an internet-delivered intervention for resilience with human support and automated support. Apart from determining the impact of the intervention on acceptability and effectiveness, this study will be a first to explore more clearly the relative benefits of different support modes.