C-reactive protein postoperative values to predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy

INTRODUCTION

despite significant medical and technological advances, the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) is reported to be between 3-45 %. The main objective of this study was to analyze the early post-surgical risk factors for developing POPF after DP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

a retrospective observational study was performed on a prospective basis of patients undergoing DP in a tertiary hospital from January 2011 to December 2021. Sociodemographic, preoperative analytical, tumor-related and postoperative complications variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

of the 52 patients analyzed, 71.8 % of the sample had postoperative drains amylase elevation. However, 25.7 % of the total had grade-B and/or grade-C POPF. Univariate logistic regression with the variables studied showed the following as risk factors for B-C or clinically relevant POPF: amylase values in drainage at the 5th postoperative day (POD) (p = 0.097; 1.01 [1-1.01]), preoperative BMI (p = 0.015; 1.27 [1.04-1.55]) and C-reactive protein (CRP) value at the 3rd POD (p = 0.034; 1.01 [1.01-1.02]). The ROC curve of CRP value at the 3rd POD showed an area under the curve of 0.764 (95 % CI: 0.6-0.93) and the best cut-off point was 190 mg/l (sensitivity 89 % and specificity 67 %).

CONCLUSIONS

CRP value at the 3rd POD is a predictive factor for POPF after DP. Early detection of patients at risk of POPF based on these characteristics could have an impact on their postoperative management.

Management of Esophageal Perforation: 28-Year Experience in a Major Referral Center

Esophageal perforation constitutes a surgical emergency. Despite its gravity, no single strategy has been described as sufficient to deal with most situations to date. The aim of this study was to assess the etiology, management, and outcome of esophageal perforation over a 28-year period, to characterize optimal treatment options in this severe disease. A retrospective clinical review of all patients treated for esophageal perforation at Ramón y Cajal Hospital between January 1987 and December 2015 was performed (n = 57). Iatrogenic injury was the most frequent cause of esophageal perforation (n = 32). Abdominal esophagus was the main location (23 patients; 40.4%). Eight patients (14%) were managed with antibiotics and parenteral nutrition. In seven patients (12.3%), an endoscopic stent was implanted. Surgical therapy was performed in 38 patients (66.7%). Morbidity and 90-day mortality rates were 61.4 and 28 per cent, respectively. Five patients were reoperated (8.8%). Median hospital stay was 23.5 days. The mortality rate was higher among patients with spontaneous and tumoral perforation (54.5 and 100%; P = 0.009), delayed diagnosis (>24 hours; P = 0.0001), and abdominal/thoracic location (37.5%; P = 0.05). No statistical differences were found between surgical and conservative/endoscopic management (31% vs 20%; P = 0.205) although hospital staying was longer in surgical group (36.30 days vs 15.63 days; P = 0.029). Esophageal perforation was associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Global outcomes depend on etiology, site of perforation, and delay in diagnosis. An individualized approach for each patient should be chosen to prevent septic complications of this potentially fatal disease.

[Transparieto-hepatic dilation of benign biliary stenosis: 5 years experience]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the results of percutaneous transparieto-hepatic dilation of benign biliary stenosis achieved over a period of 5 years.

DESIGN

A retrospective study to assess the technique, complications and the clinical, analytical and radiology results.

PATIENTS

Data was gathered on 13 patients diagnosed in our Hospital between the years 2002 and 2006 with benign biliary stenosis and who had been treated using percutaneous dilation. Patients diagnosed with malignant disease and those who had a prosthesis were excluded. Seven of the patients had received a liver transplant. One patient had an endoscopic dilation on two occasions, with the stenosis persisting.

RESULTS

A clinical and radiological improvement was observed in 60% of the cases, and an analytical improvement in 69% (61% normal). Re-stenosis occurred in 30% of the cases, of which 50% were rescue support using re-dilation. The complications presented (30.7%) were resolved conservatively. No significant differences were observed between the transplanted and the non-transplanted groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Transparieto-hepatic dilation of benign biliary stenosis is a fairly safe technique and has a high rate of resolution in the medium term, and avoids the use of surgery in 75% of patients. The results need to be confirmed in larger samples.