1
|
Mekić S, Pardo LM, Gunn DA, Jacobs LC, Hamer MA, Ikram MA, Vinke EJ, Vernooij MW, Haarman AEG, Thee EF, Vergroesen JE, Klaver CCW, Croll PH, Goedegebure A, Trajanoska K, Rivadeneira F, van Meurs JBJ, Arshi B, Kavousi M, de Roos EW, Brusselle GGO, Kayser M, Nijsten T. Younger facial looks are associate with a lower likelihood of several age-related morbidities in the middle-aged to elderly. Br J Dermatol 2023; 188:390-395. [PMID: 36763776 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljac100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Looking older for one's chronological age is associated with a higher mortality rate. Yet it remains unclear how perceived facial age relates to morbidity and the degree to which facial ageing reflects systemic ageing of the human body. OBJECTIVES To investigate the association between ΔPA and age-related morbidities of different organ systems, where ΔPA represents the difference between perceived age (PA) and chronological age. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional analysis on data from the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort study in the Netherlands. High-resolution facial photographs of 2679 men and women aged 51.5-87.8 years of European descent were used to assess PA. PA was estimated and scored in 5-year categories using these photographs by a panel of men and women who were blinded for chronological age and medical history. A linear mixed model was used to generate the mean PAs. The difference between the mean PA and chronological age was calculated (ΔPA), where a higher (positive) ΔPA means that the person looks younger for their age and a lower (negative) ΔPA that the person looks older. ΔPA was tested as a continuous variable for association with ageing-related morbidities including cardiovascular, pulmonary, ophthalmological, neurocognitive, renal, skeletal and auditory morbidities in separate regression analyses, adjusted for age and sex (model 1) and additionally for body mass index, smoking and sun exposure (model 2). RESULTS We observed 5-year higher ΔPA (i.e. looking younger by 5 years for one's age) to be associated with less osteoporosis [odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.93], less chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.95), less age-related hearing loss (model 2; B = -0.76, 95% CI -1.35 to -0.17) and fewer cataracts (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97), but with better global cognitive functioning (g-factor; model 2; B = 0.07, 95% CI 0.04-0.10). CONCLUSIONS PA is associated with multiple morbidities and better cognitive function, suggesting that systemic ageing and cognitive ageing are, to an extent, externally visible in the human face.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selma Mekić
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Luba M Pardo
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David A Gunn
- Unilever Research and Development, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, UK
| | - Leonie C Jacobs
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Merel A Hamer
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Arfan Ikram
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eline J Vinke
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Meike W Vernooij
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annet E G Haarman
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eric F Thee
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joelle E Vergroesen
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline C W Klaver
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pauline H Croll
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andre Goedegebure
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Katerina Trajanoska
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joyce B J van Meurs
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Banafsheh Arshi
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maryam Kavousi
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emmely W de Roos
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Guy G O Brusselle
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Manfred Kayser
- Department of Genetic Identification, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tamar Nijsten
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huizinga W, Poot DHJ, Vinke EJ, Wenzel F, Bron EE, Toussaint N, Ledig C, Vrooman H, Ikram MA, Niessen WJ, Vernooij MW, Klein S. Differences Between MR Brain Region Segmentation Methods: Impact on Single-Subject Analysis. Front Big Data 2021; 4:577164. [PMID: 34723175 PMCID: PMC8552517 DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2021.577164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
For the segmentation of magnetic resonance brain images into anatomical regions, numerous fully automated methods have been proposed and compared to reference segmentations obtained manually. However, systematic differences might exist between the resulting segmentations, depending on the segmentation method and underlying brain atlas. This potentially results in sensitivity differences to disease and can further complicate the comparison of individual patients to normative data. In this study, we aim to answer two research questions: 1) to what extent are methods interchangeable, as long as the same method is being used for computing normative volume distributions and patient-specific volumes? and 2) can different methods be used for computing normative volume distributions and assessing patient-specific volumes? To answer these questions, we compared volumes of six brain regions calculated by five state-of-the-art segmentation methods: Erasmus MC (EMC), FreeSurfer (FS), geodesic information flows (GIF), multi-atlas label propagation with expectation–maximization (MALP-EM), and model-based brain segmentation (MBS). We applied the methods on 988 non-demented (ND) subjects and computed the correlation (PCC-v) and absolute agreement (ICC-v) on the volumes. For most regions, the PCC-v was good (>0.75), indicating that volume differences between methods in ND subjects are mainly due to systematic differences. The ICC-v was generally lower, especially for the smaller regions, indicating that it is essential that the same method is used to generate normative and patient data. To evaluate the impact on single-subject analysis, we also applied the methods to 42 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In the case where the normative distributions and the patient-specific volumes were calculated by the same method, the patient’s distance to the normative distribution was assessed with the z-score. We determined the diagnostic value of this z-score, which showed to be consistent across methods. The absolute agreement on the AD patients’ z-scores was high for regions of thalamus and putamen. This is encouraging as it indicates that the studied methods are interchangeable for these regions. For regions such as the hippocampus, amygdala, caudate nucleus and accumbens, and globus pallidus, not all method combinations showed a high ICC-z. Whether two methods are indeed interchangeable should be confirmed for the specific application and dataset of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Huizinga
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - D H J Poot
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - E J Vinke
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - F Wenzel
- Philips Research Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - E E Bron
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - N Toussaint
- School of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Ledig
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - H Vrooman
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - M A Ikram
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - W J Niessen
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Quantitative Imaging Group, Department of Imaging Physics, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - M W Vernooij
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - S Klein
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vinke EJ, Eyding J, de Korte C, Slump CH, van der Hoeven JG, Hoedemaekers CWE. Quantification of Macrocirculation and Microcirculation in Brain Using Ultrasound Perfusion Imaging. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2018; 126:115-120. [PMID: 29492545 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of simultaneous visualization of the cerebral macrocirculation and microcirculation, using ultrasound perfusion imaging (UPI). In addition, we studied the sensitivity of this technique for detecting changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF). MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed an observational study in ten healthy volunteers. Ultrasound contrast was used for UPI measurements during normoventilation and hyperventilation. For the data analysis of the UPI measurements, an in-house algorithm was used to visualize the DICOM files, calculate parameter images and select regions of interest (ROIs). Next, time intensity curves (TIC) were extracted and perfusion parameters calculated. RESULTS Both volume- and velocity-related perfusion parameters were significantly different between the macrocirculation and the parenchymal areas. Hyperventilation-induced decreases in CBF were detectable by UPI in both the macrocirculation and microcirculation, most consistently by the volume-related parameters. The method was safe, with no adverse effects in our population. CONCLUSIONS Bedside quantification of CBF seems feasible and the technique has a favourable safety profile. Adjustment of current method is required to improve its diagnostic accuracy. Validation studies using a 'gold standard' are needed to determine the added value of UPI in neurocritical care monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline J Vinke
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jens Eyding
- Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Chris de Korte
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H Slump
- MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van den Brule JMD, Vinke EJ, van Loon LM, van der Hoeven JG, Hoedemaekers CWE. Low spontaneous variability in cerebral blood flow velocity in non-survivors after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2016; 111:110-115. [PMID: 28007503 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2016] [Revised: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate spontaneous variability in the time and frequency domain in mean flow velocity (MFV) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in comatose patients after cardiac arrest, and determine possible differences between survivors and non-survivors. METHODS A prospective observational study was performed at the ICU of a tertiary care university hospital in the Netherlands. We studied 11 comatose patients and 10 controls. MFV in the middle cerebral artery was measured with simultaneously recording of MAP. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used as a standardized measure of dispersion in the time domain. In the frequency domain, the average spectral power of MAP and MFV were calculated in the very low, low and high frequency bands. RESULTS In survivors CV of MFV increased from 4.66 [3.92-6.28] to 7.52 [5.52-15.23] % at T=72h. In non-survivors CV of MFV decreased from 9.02 [1.70-9.36] to 1.97 [1.97-1.97] %. CV of MAP was low immediately after admission (1.46 [1.09-2.25] %) and remained low at 72h (3.05 [1.87-3.63] %) (p=0.13). There were no differences in CV of MAP between survivors and non-survivors (p=0.30). We noticed significant differences between survivors and non-survivors in the VLF band for average spectral power of MAP (p=0.03) and MFV (p=0.003), whereby the power of both MAP and MFV increased in survivors during admission, while remaining low in non-survivors. CONCLUSIONS Cerebral blood flow is altered after cardiac arrest, with decreased spontaneous fluctuations in non-survivors. Most likely, these changes are the consequence of impaired intrinsic myogenic vascular function and autonomic dysregulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M D van den Brule
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - E J Vinke
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L M van Loon
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J G van der Hoeven
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C W E Hoedemaekers
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kruse RR, Vinke EJ, Poelmann FB, Rohof D, Holewijn S, Slump CH, Reijnen M. Computation of blood flow through collateral circulation of the superficial femoral artery. Vascular 2015; 24:126-33. [PMID: 25972029 DOI: 10.1177/1708538115586939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Obliteration of collaterals during (endo)vascular treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease is considered detrimental. We use a model to calculate maximum collateral bed flow of the superficial femoral artery in order to provide insight in their hemodynamic relevance. METHOD A computational model was developed using digital subtraction angiographies in combination with Poiseuille's equation and Ohm's law. Lesions were divided into short and long (<15 cm and ≥15 cm, respectively) and into stenosis and occlusions. Data are presented in relation to the calculated maximum healthy superficial femoral artery flow. RESULTS Stenotic lesions are longer than occlusive lesions (P < 0.05) and occlusions had more and larger collaterals (P < 0.05). In all four study groups the collateral flow significantly increased the total flow (P < 0.05). The maximum collateral system flow in the stenosis and occlusion groups was 5.1% and 20.8% of healthy superficial femoral artery flow, respectively (P < 0.05), and there were no significant differences between short and long lesions (11.2% and 6.7% of healthy superficial femoral artery flow, respectively). CONCLUSION The maximum collateral system flow of the superficial femoral artery is only a fraction, with a maximum of one fifth, of healthy superficial femoral artery flow. Effects of collateral vessel occlusion during (endo)vascular treatment may therefore be without detrimental consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R R Kruse
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - E J Vinke
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands Department of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - F B Poelmann
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - D Rohof
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - S Holewijn
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - C H Slump
- Department of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Mmpj Reijnen
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|