"We are looking at the future right now": community acceptability of a home-based viral load test device in the context of HIV cure-related research with analytical treatment interruptions in the United States

BACKGROUND

People with HIV (PWH) and community members have advocated for the development of a home-based viral load test device that could make analytical treatment interruptions (ATIs) less burdensome.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed community acceptability of a novel home-based viral load test device.

METHODS

In 2021, we conducted 15 interviews and 3 virtual focus groups with PWH involved in HIV cure research. We used conventional thematic analysis to analyze the data.

RESULTS

PWH viewed the home-based viral load test device as a critical adjunct in ongoing HIV cure trials with ATIs. The ability to test for viral load at home on demand would alleviate anxiety around being off ART. Participants drew parallels with glucometers used for diabetes. A preference was expressed for the home-based test to clearly indicate whether one was detectable or undetectable for HIV to mitigate risk of HIV transmission to partners. Perceived advantages of the device included convenience, sense of control, and no puncturing of veins. Perceived concerns were possible physical marks, user errors and navigating the logistics of mailing samples to a laboratory and receiving test results. Participants expressed mixed effects on stigma, such as helping normalize HIV, but increased potential for inadvertent disclosure of HIV status or ATI participation. Increasing pluri-potency of the device beyond viral load testing (e.g., CD4+ count test) would increase its utility. Participants suggested pairing the device with telemedicine and mobile health technologies.

CONCLUSIONS

If proven effective, the home-based viral load test device will become a critical adjunct in HIV cure research and HIV care.

Methadone use is associated with increased levels of sCD14, immune activation, and inflammation during suppressed HIV infection

Opioid use has negative effects on immune responses and may impair immune reconstitution in persons living with HIV (PLWH) infection undergoing antiretroviral treatment (ART). The effects of treatment with μ opioid receptor (MOR) agonists (e.g., methadone, MET) and antagonists (e.g., naltrexone, NTX) on immune reconstitution and immune activation in ART-suppressed PLWH have not been assessed in-depth. We studied the effects of methadone or naltrexone on measures of immune reconstitution and immune activation in a cross-sectional community cohort of 30 HIV-infected individuals receiving suppressive ART and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) (12 MET, 8 NTX and 10 controls). Plasma markers of inflammation and immune activation were measured using ELISA, Luminex, or Simoa. Plasma IgG glycosylation was assessed using capillary electrophoresis. Cell subsets and activation were studied using whole blood flow cytometry. Individuals in the MET group, but no in the NTX group, had higher plasma levels of inflammation and immune activation markers than controls. These markers include soluble CD14 (an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality during HIV infection), proinflammatory cytokines, and proinflammatory IgG glycans. This effect was independent of time on treatment. Our results indicate that methadone-based MOUD regimens may sustain immune activation and inflammation in ART-treated HIV-infected individuals. Our pilot study provides the foundation and rationale for future longitudinal functional studies of the impact of MOUD regimens on immune reconstitution and residual activation after ART-mediated suppression.

Preliminary Acceptability of a Home-Based Peripheral Blood Collection Device for Viral Load Testing in the Context of Analytical Treatment Interruptions in HIV Cure Trials: Results from a Nationwide Survey in the United States

Frequent viral load testing is necessary during analytical treatment interruptions (ATIs) in HIV cure-directed clinical trials, though such may be burdensome and inconvenient to trial participants. We implemented a national, cross-sectional survey in the United States to examine the acceptability of a novel home-based peripheral blood collection device for HIV viral load testing. Between June and August 2021, we distributed an online survey to people with HIV (PWH) and community members, biomedical HIV cure researchers and HIV care providers. We performed descriptive analyses to summarize the results. We received 73 survey responses, with 51 from community members, 12 from biomedical HIV cure researchers and 10 from HIV care providers. Of those, 51 (70%) were cisgender men and 50 (68%) reported living with HIV. Most (>80% overall) indicated that the device would be helpful during ATI trials and they would feel comfortable using it themselves or recommending it to their patients/participants. Of the 50 PWH, 42 (84%) indicated they would use the device if they were participating in an ATI trial and 27 (54%) also expressed a willingness to use the device outside of HIV cure studies. Increasing sensitivity of viral load tests and pluri-potency of the device (CD4 count, chemistries) would augment acceptability. Survey findings provide evidence that viral load home testing would be an important adjunct to ongoing HIV cure-directed trials involving ATIs. Survey findings may help inform successful implementation and uptake of the device in the context of personalized HIV care.

Urine Assay to Measure Tenofovir Concentrations in Patients Taking Tenofovir Alafenamide

Background: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir/emtricitabine is effective when taken daily. Previously, we developed a urine assay capable of detecting the prodrug tenofovir (TFV) in patients taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based PrEP. However, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has replaced TDF due to its different safety profile for HIV treatment and was recently approved as PrEP. Given the need to ensure the aforementioned assay remains available for the purpose of objective adherence monitoring, it is critical to ensure its accuracy for detecting TFV in patients taking TAF. Methods: Blood and urine samples were collected from 3 cohorts of patients: (1) 10 participants living with HIV (PLWH) with suppressed virus on a TAF-based regimen, (2) 10 HIV-participants administered 1 dose of TAF/FTC followed by urine and plasma sampling for 7 days starting 1-3 h post-dose, and (3) 10 HIV-participants administered 7 doses of TAF/FTC followed by urine and plasma sampling for 10 days starting 1-3 h after the last dose. Samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with high sensitivity and specificity for TFV. HIV-samples were compared to a historical cohort administered one dose of TDF/FTC. Results: PLWH were 90% male, 40% African American, and 10% Hispanic (mean age = 57 y; SD 8.88 y). HIV-participants were 55% male and 70% Caucasian (mean age = 31.6 y; SD 7.70 y). Samples from PLWH demonstrated TFV concentrations 2 logs higher in urine than plasma (1,000 ng/mL vs ±10 ng/mL) at the time of collection. Urine samples following a single dose of TAF in HIV-participants yielded TFV concentrations ranging from 100 to 1,000 ng/mL 1-3 h post-dose and remained >100 ng/mL for 6 days in 8 of 10 participants. Urine samples collected after 7 consecutive doses of TAF yielded TFV concentrations >1,000 ng/mL 1-3 h after dosing discontinuation, with TFV concentrations >1,00 ng/mL 7 days post discontinuation in 8 of 10 participants. Urine TFV concentrations following TAF administration were comparable to those from a historical cohort administered TDF/FTC. Plasma TFV concentrations were low(±10 ng/mL) in both HIV-cohorts at all time points. Conclusions: TFV persists in urine at detectable concentrations in participants taking TAF/FTC for at least 7 days despite largely undetectable plasma concentrations, with urine TFV concentrations comparable to patients taking TDF/FTC. This study demonstrates the ability of a urine TFV assay to measure recent TAF adherence.