An Analysis of the Sensitivity of the Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) Assay, as Used in a Large Laboratory Network, to Coagulation Factor Deficiencies

OBJECTIVES

To advance knowledge in using the ex vivo method to identify factor sensitivity of the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), using data from a hemophilia and reference hemostasis laboratory; to evaluate application of inclusion and exclusion criteria to eliminate data outliers; and to discuss outcomes with reference to comparable studies.

METHODS

An ex vivo, retrospective analysis was performed on patient samples with conjointly ordered APTT and intrinsic pathway factors (VIII, IX, XI, XII) for application to a large network of laboratories. The relationship between factor levels and APTT, before and after application of exclusion criteria, is demonstrated.

RESULTS

Curvilinear relationships were found between all factor levels and APTTs, which demonstrated both similarities and differences with available studies. Factor sensitivity data are presented. Study strengths include large sample size and use of real-world data. Limitations include inability to exclude all residual outliers and paucity of patient samples singularly deficient in factors other than FVIII.

CONCLUSIONS

This ex vivo, retrospective analysis of the sensitivity of the APTT assay to intrinsic pathway factor deficiencies using real-world data from a hemophilia and reference hemostasis laboratory contains the largest sample size using this approach to date. The outcomes assist in informing practice in this area and can be used as a reference for further studies.

Anti-Endothelial Cell Antibodies are not frequently elevated in hospitalized patients with COVID-19

n/a.

Anti-Endothelial Cell Antibodies are not frequently elevated in hospitalized patients with COVID-19

COVID-19 is now established to be associated with a thrombotic phenomenon, now called COVID-19 associated coagulopathy (CAC). Anti-Endothelial Cell Antibodies (AECA) are a heterogenous group of autoantibodies targeting various endothelial cell antigens or antigens adhering to endothelial cells, They are commonly observed in a variety of auto-immune and rheumatologic conditions, and were observed in patients with the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2005. We aimed to assess AECA status in patients with COVID-19 and their potential contributing role to endothelial injury and CAC. AECA identification was a relatively infrequent finding in COVID-19 patients on admission, and their presence, albeit in only 2/33 patients, was not associated with disease severity. However, as the autoantibodies were only measured at admission, we cannot exclude the possibility of pathogenic AECA developing later in the course of diseaseFurther studies using additional methods are needed to evaluate the presence and potential pathogenic role of AECA in later stages of COVID-19.

Mixing studies for lupus anticoagulant: mostly yes, sometimes no

Lupus anticoagulants (LAs) represent one manifestation of the clinical condition called antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and are associated with many adverse clinical outcomes, but primarily with thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. LAs are identified by laboratory testing, principally using clot-based assays based on Russell viper venom time (RVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) test methods. All three of the most recent guidance documents for LA testing recommend using these tests, although they vary in regard to inclusion/exclusion of other test processes. Mixing studies form part of the process of LA identification/exclusion, since in vitro LAs act like coagulation inhibitors. Mixing studies are also supported by all three LA guidance documents, but recommendations vary in regard to relative importance and placement in the LA identification/exclusion algorithm. This Point article takes the position that mixing tests are usually indicated for appropriate identification/exclusion of LAs, but can occasionally be omitted.

COVID-19: progression of disease and intravascular coagulation - present status and future perspectives

The timely and accurate diagnosis of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), remains the cornerstone of efforts to provide appropriated treatment for patients, to limit further spread of the virus and ultimately to eliminate the virus from the human society. We focus this article on (a) developments for improvement of diagnosis of specific SARS-CoV-2 virus, (b) laboratory changes in the immunologic and coagulation system, (c) therapeutic options for anticoagulant treatment of seriously affected patients and (d) on the perspectives through improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures.

Recent Advances in Mainstream Hemostasis Diagnostics and Coagulation Testing

The authors provide a narrative review of mainstream hemostasis analyzers. The review is presented in two parts. In the first part, the authors give voice to several internationally representative manufacturers of mainstream hemostasis analyzers. They ask these manufacturers to (1) answer a series of survey questions that may otherwise reflect common questions asked by users or potential users of their equipment, (2) provide a bullet list of their main focus areas, and (3) provide other information in regard to their instrumentation. The authors then offer their own personal perspective of the benefits of various aspects of such equipment, as well as a sampling of some hemostasis tests as currently available, or potentially in progress. It is hoped that this snapshot of mainstream hemostasis diagnostics and coagulation testing drives positive future changes that will ultimately provide the best outcomes for laboratories performing hemostasis assays and the patients they help diagnose and manage.

To Maintain or Cease Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Prior to Minimal Bleeding Risk Procedures: A Review of Evidence and Recommendations

For procedures associated with minimal bleeding risk, there are data and experience to support the practice of continuing vitamin K antagonists rather than interrupting therapy, to prevent exposing patients to the undue risk of developing thromboembolism during anticoagulation cessation. Despite the increasing use of non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), there is little evidence to guide the management of these drugs around minimal bleeding risk procedures. This review examines and discusses the major society guidelines and recommendations addressing the management of NOACs around minimal bleeding risk procedures. Additionally, it summarizes the existing evidence, and highlights the gaps in knowledge where evidence is not yet available. Finally, recommendations are made to assist the proceduralist deal with this area of limited evidence.

Analytical Assessment of the New Roche Cobas t 711 Fully Automated Coagulation Analyzer

This study aimed to provide a preliminary evaluation of the analytical performance of the new Roche cobas t 711 fully automated coagulation analyzer, which uses both liquid and lyophilized reagent cassettes. The analytical assessment included analysis of imprecision and linearity of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and fibrinogen on cobas t 711 analyzer. Test results of 120 routine plasma samples were also compared with those obtained using two other coagulation analyzers (Instrumentation Laboratory ACL TOP 700 and Stago STA-R MAX). The accuracy, imprecision, and comparability of manual and automatic lyophilized material resuspension were also evaluated using 200 routine plasma samples. Overall, automatic resuspension was found to be more precise than, and equally accurate as, manual reconstitution, with coefficient of variations (CV%) three- to sixfold lower compared with manual reconstitution. The analytical imprecision was found to be excellent, as attested by total CV% of 0.7% for PT, 1.7 to 1.8% for APTT, and 1.9 to 3.2% for fibrinogen. Linearity was excellent over a clinically significant range of PT, APTT, and fibrinogen values, displaying correlation coefficients comprised between 0.994 and 0.999. Methods comparison studies revealed that results of PT, APTT, and fibrinogen on cobas t 711 are globally aligned with those obtained using identical plasma samples on IL ACL TOP 700 and Stago STA-R MAX, displaying correlation coefficients of 0.97 for PT, 0.81 and 0.88 for APTT, 0.90 and 0.94 for fibrinogen, respectively. In conclusion, the results of this preliminary evaluation demonstrate that PT, APTT, and fibrinogen on cobas t 711 coagulation analyzer displays excellent performance for routine use in clinical laboratories.

Prothrombotic State Induced by Middle-Distance Endurance Exercise in Middle-Aged Athletes

Since the impact of possible prothrombotic factors on blood coagulation resulting from exercise remains elusive, this study investigated the acute effects of middle-distance endurance running on blood coagulation parameters in middle-aged athletes. The study population consisted of 33 male endurance runners who were engaged in a 21.1 km run under competitive conditions. Blood samples were collected before the run, immediately after the run, and 3 hours after run completion. Samples were assessed for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, D-dimer, factor VIII (FVIII), von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag), endogenous thrombin potential (area under the curve of thrombin generation [TGA-AUC]), and peak thrombin generation (TGA-PK). Post-run variations were expressed as delta (Δ). At baseline, APTT was found to be significantly associated with ABO blood group, VWF:Ag, and FVIII; fibrinogen with age; VWF:Ag with BMI, training regimen, and ABO blood group; APTT with FVIII; FVIII with VWF:Ag and ABO blood group; APTT with VWF:Ag; and TGA-PK with ABO blood group, PT, and TGA-AUC. Immediately after the run, statistically significant increases were observed for PT, D-dimer, VWF:Ag, and FVIII, while statistically significant reductions could be observed for APTT, TGA-AUC, and TGA-PK. Fibrinogen values remained unchanged. Significant correlations were observed between Δ VWF:Ag and Δ FVIII, Δ APTT and Δ VWF:Ag, Δ APTT and Δ FVIII, Δ TGA-AUC and Δ TGA-PK, and between Δ D-dimer and Δ TGA-AUC and Δ TGA-PK. No Δ variation was associated with running time. The results of this study seemingly suggest that middle-distance competitive running may evoke several prothrombotic changes in blood coagulation.

Sudden Cardiac and Noncardiac Death in Sports: Epidemiology, Causes, Pathogenesis, and Prevention

Although few doubts remain that physical exercise should be widely promoted for maintenance of health and fitness, the risk of adverse events such as sudden death (especially due to cardiac causes, i.e., sudden cardiac death [SCD]) during exercise remains tangible. The overall risk of sudden death in athletes is relatively low (i.e., usually comprised between 0.1 and 38/100,000 person-years), and globally comparable to that of the general population. However, up to 20% of all sudden death cases are still recorded while exercising. The most frequent underlying disorders encountered in SCD are hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease (CAD), representing three quarters of all conditions. The risk related to CAD increases with aging (>35 years old), while that attributable to cardiomyopathies or fatal arrhythmias is especially frequent among young people (<35 years old). Taken together, these findings would lead to the conclusion that physical exercise may be seen as an acute trigger of myocardial ischemia or arrhythmias in some predisposed individuals. Nonetheless, the prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis seems to be higher in athletes than in sedentary subjects with comparable risk profile. On the contrary, coronary plaques in physically active subjects appear more stable, thereby attenuating the risk of rupture and subsequent myocardial ischemia. These findings, along with evidence of a considerable increase of peak coronary blood flow during exercise, make it very likely that an imbalance between oxygen demand and supply may be the most frequent cause of myocardial ischemia in athletes suffering SCD and/or cardiac arrest. Therefore, all subjects who wish to practice moderate- to high-intensity exercise are recommended to undergo preparticipation screening and annual follow-up.

A Comparative Multi-laboratory Assessment of Three Factor VIII/von Willebrand Factor Concentrates

Five expert laboratories have participated in a cross-laboratory study to co-evaluate and compare three commercial Factor VIII/von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrates. A total of nine factor concentrate lots were evaluated, comprising AHF (High Purity) (AHF HP; X3), Biostate® (X3) and Humate/Haemate (X3). All laboratories blind tested for FVIII:C, VWF:Ag and VWF:CB, four tested for VWF:RCo, and one performed VWF:Multimers. The study yielded inter-laboratory CVs for VWF:Ag and FVIII:C around 10–15%, and for VWF:CB and VWF:RCo around 20%, significantly lower than those of previous multi-laboratory surveys. All three lots of AHF HP contained in the vicinity of 25 U/ml FVIII:C, around 60–75 U/ml of VWF:Ag, but only 30–45 U/ml of VWF:CB and 40–50 U/ml of VWF:RCo (thus, CB/Ag ratio around 0.5–0.6 and RCo/Ag ratio around 0.6–0.7). Study determined that FVIII:C and VWF:RCo levels were similar to manufacturer assigned levels. Some loss of the high molecular weight (HMW) multimers was observed, together with an intense low molecular weight (LMW) VWF band consistent with some reduction or proteolysis of HMW VWF. All three lots of Humate/Haemate contained in the vicinity of 23–32 U/ml of FVIII:C, 70–105 U/ml of VWF:Ag, 50–90 U/ml of VWF:CB and VWF:RCo (i. e. CB/Ag ratio around 0.6–0.9 and RCo/Ag ratio around 0.6–1.1). Study-determined FVIII:C and VWF:RCo levels were similar to manufacturer-assigned levels. The LMW multimer band seen with AHF HP was also observed with Humate/Haemate. All three lots of Biostate contained in the vicinity of 40–55 U/ml of FVIII:C, 105–170 U/ml of VWF:Ag, 90–150 U/ml of VWF:CB, and 90–135 U/ml of VWF:RCo (i. e. CB/Ag and RCo/Ag ratios around 0.7–1.0). Study-determined FVIII:C levels were similar to manufacturer-assigned levels. The LMW multimer band seen with AHF HP was not observed with Biostate. The defined pattern of increasing CB/ Ag from AHF HP to Humate/Haemate and Biostate was consistently observed in study data from each of the five laboratories. In conclusion, study findings indicate some differences in the retention of functional/ HMW VWF between factor concentrates, and this is expected to have significant implications in terms of clinical efficacy for therapy in VWD.

Discrimination of von Willebrands Disease (VWD) Subtypes: Direct Comparison of von Willebrand Factor:Collagen Binding Assay (VWF:CBA) with Monoclonal Antibody (MAB) Based VWF-capture Systems

Discrimination of von Willebrand’s Disease (VWD) subtypes is important since it influences management. Qualitative [ie Type 2A, 2B, 2M] defects exhibit von Willebrand factor (VWF) discordance and give high VWF:Ag to VWF:’activity’ ratios. Classically, VWF:’activity’ is assessed using the VWF:RCof assay. The VWF:CBA is an ELISAbased VWF-functional adhesive assay which has consistently proved to be superior to VWF:RCof. A commercially available monoclonal antibody (MAB) based ELISA assay system claimed to mimic a VWF:RCof-like activity has also been recently described (‘SE’), as has the production and characterisation of a large number [n = 10] of locally generated anti-VWF MAB. In the current study, we have adapted these MAB to in-house ELISA assays to assess their utility for VWD diagnosis and subtype discrimination, and to compare them with other assay systems. Thus, the VWF:CBA, VWF:RCof by agglutination, the SE assay, and in-house MAB based assays have been directly compared for their ability to discriminate Type 1 [n = 9] from Type 2 VWD samples [phenotypes 2A and 2B; n = 11]. In summary, MAB-based systems can be used to measure VWF and confirm a diagnosis of VWD, as well as exhibiting some VWD-subtype-discriminatory capabilities. However, better evidence of VWF-discordance was usually achieved using the VWF:RCof (agglutination) assay, while the greatest degree of VWFdiscordance was consistently observed using the VWF:CBA assay. In conclusion, the VWF:CBA assay proved to offer the best diagnostic predictive tool for a Type 2 VWD defect, while MAB-based systems appear to be less effective in this regard.

Abbreviations: HMW: High Molecular Weight [VWF], MAB: Monoclonal antibody (/antibodies), PNP: Pooled Normal Plasma, RIPA: Ristocetin induced platelet aggregation, VWD: von Willebrands disease (/disorder), VWF: von Willebrand Factor, VWF:Ag: von Willebrand Factor Antigen (assay), VWF:CBA: Collagen Binding [Activity] Assay for VWF, VWF:RCof: Ristocetin Cofactor Assay for VWF

Human Endothelial Cells Maintain Anti-Aggregatory Activity for Platelets during Apoptosis

Despite evidence of elevated levels of tissue factor and platelet binding by apoptotic endothelial cells, microthrombi do not appear to be associated with apoptotic endothelium and this suggests maintained anti-aggregatory activity for platelets. We report that anti-aggregatory activity is maintained by apoptotic endothelium obtained by serum and or matrix deprivation, which we propose as models for apoptotic endothelial cells released during microvascular remodelling and traumatic detachment respectively. Both apoptotic and non-apoptotic endothelium had strong anti-aggregatory activity for platelets stimulated with either ADP or thrombin. Inhibition experiments using L-NAME and indo-methacin indicated a role for nitric oxide and prostacyclin in this activity. Experiments with latex beads further confirmed that inhibited platelet aggregation by endothelium was not merely a non-specific phenomenon. These data support the idea that EC maintain active anti-thrombotic activity during apoptosis, consistent with maintained urokinase levels and canalicular fragmentation reported elsewhere.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand’s Disease: An Assessment of Current Diagnostic Practice and Efficacy by Means of a Multi-laboratory Survey

We report an evaluation of current laboratory practice for the diagnosis of von Willebrand’s disease (VWD) by means of a multilaboratory survey. This assessment was undertaken with the RCPA Quality Assurance Program (QAP) in Haematology, which covers a wide geographic area encompassing Australia, New Zealand and Asia. A total of 25 laboratories actively involved in testing for VWD were selected to participate in a sample testing assessment exercise. Samples comprised 10 plasmas: (i) a normal plasma pool (in duplicate), (ii) this pool diluted to 50% (in duplicate), (iii) a normal individual (×1), (iv) severe Type 1 VWD (×1), (v) Type 2B VWD (×2 unrelated donors), (vi) Type 3 VWD (×1), (vii) Type 2A VWD (×1). Laboratories were asked to perform all tests available to them in order to establish a laboratory diagnosis of VWD, and then to comment on the possibility or otherwise of VWD. Overall findings indicated a wide variation in test practice, in the effectiveness of various test procedures in detecting VWD, and in the ability of various composite test panels to identify type 2 VWD subtypes. Firstly, while all laboratories (n = 25) performed tests for FVIII:C activity, von Willebrand factor ‘antigen’ (VWF:Ag) and a functional VWF assay [using the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo; n = 23) and/or the collagen binding assay (VWF:CBA; n = 12)], only three laboratories carried out VWF:Multimer analysis. Secondly, for the three quantitative VWF assays, 10/25 (40%) laboratories performed all three, whereas 15/25 (60%) performed only two [VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo (n = 13); VWF:Ag and VWF:CBA (n = 2)]. Thirdly, a variety of assay methodologies were evident for VWF:Ag [ELISA, electro-immuno diffusion (EID), latex immuno-assay (LIA), and VIDAS assay] and VWF:RCo (platelet agglutination/‘aggregometry’ and a ‘functional VWF:RCo-alternative’ ELISA assay). Between method analysis for the quantitative VWF assays showed that the VWF:RCo yielded the greatest degree of inter-laboratory assay variation, and had the poorest overall performance with respect to sensitivity to low levels of VWF. The VWF:CBA also performed better than the VWF:RCo in terms of ability to detect functional VWF ‘discordance’ (i.e. Type 2 VWD). Within VWF:Ag method analysis showed that the EID assay procedure was associated with the greatest variation in assay

Collagen Binding Assay for von Willebrand Factor (VWF:CBA): Detection of von Willebrands Disease (VWD), and Discrimination of VWD Subtypes, Depends on Collagen Source

A large number of different collagen preparations [n = 21] have been assessed for their ability to both detect von Willebrands Disease (VWD), and discriminate different VWD subtypes. Collagen preparations were tested at a range of concentrations and included: Type I, III and IV, and various mixtures of these, as aqueous supplied preparations and/or reconstituted from bulk lyophilised stock. Tissue sources for collagens ranged from human placenta to calf skin to equine tendon. Three of the collagen preparations tested did not support von Willebrand factor (VWF) binding in an ELISA process (therefore unable to detect VWD). The ability of the remaining preparations to detect VWF was variable, as was their ability to discriminate VWD subtypes. Detection of VWF and discrimination of VWD subtypes was not mutually inclusive. Thus, some collagen preparations provided excellent detection systems for VWF, but comparatively poorer discrimination of Type 2 VWD, while others provided good to acceptable detection and discrimination. Subtype discrimination was also dependent on the collagen concentration, and some batch to batch variation was evident with some preparations (particularly Type I collagens). Overall, best discrimination was typically achieved with Type I/III collagen mixtures, or Type III collagen preparations (where effectiveness was highly dependent on concentration). Good discrimination was also achieved with a commercial Type III collagen based VWF:CBA kit method. Results of the various ‘VWF:CBA assays’ are also compared with those using the Ristocetin Cofactor (VWF:RCof) assay (by platelet agglutination) and that using a commercial ‘VWF:RCof-alternative/ activity’ ELISA procedure. These latter methodologies tended to be less sensitive to VWF-discordance when compared to that detected by the majority of the VWF:CBA procedures.

Abbreviations: FVIII:C Factor VIII: coagulant (assay); HMW High Molecular Weight [VWF]; PNP Pooled Normal Plasma; RIPA Ristocetin induced platelet aggregation procedure; VWD von Willebrands disease; VWF von Willebrand Factor; VWF:Ag von Willebrand Factor Antigen (assay); VWF: CBA Collagen Binding [Activity] Assay for VWF; VWF:RCof Ristocetin Cofactor Assay for VWF

A novel flow cytometry single tube bead assay for quantitation of von Willebrand factor antigen and collagen-binding

Deficiency of or defects in the plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF) lead to bleeding and von Willebrand disease (VWD), which may be congenital or acquired. VWD is considered the most common inherited bleeding disorder and laboratory testing for VWF level and activity is critical for appropriate diagnosis and management. We have designed and established a novel Flow Cytometry (FC) based method for measuring VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and collagen binding (VWF:CB), together in the same tube and at the same time. The results of the novel FC method have been compared against existing reference methods using a range of normal and pathological material. Methods correlated well (VWF:Ag, r=0.866; VWF:CB, r=0.888) and generally permitted similar discrimination of quantitative versus qualitative VWD types (e.g. type 1 vs type 2A or 2B VWD). The novel procedure is expected to permit future streamlined performance of VWD screening, either using stand-alone FC systems or potentially incorporated into FC-capable automated blood cell and particle counters to allow for improved, automated and faster identification or exclusion of VWD.

2B or not 2B? Disparate discrimination of functional VWF discordance using different assay panels or methodologies may lead to success or failure in the early identification of type 2B VWD

Laboratory proficiency in the identification of functional von Willebrand factor (VWF) discordance in type 2B von Willebrand disease (VWD) was assessed by external quality assurance surveys conducted by the RCPA Haematology QAP, and using six different type 2B VWD plasma samples (three historical and three previously unpublished) tested by up to 52 laboratories. For the three most recent samples, functional VWF discordance was either not identified in testing or by interpretation with misidentification as ‘normal’ or ‘type 1 VWD’, on average for 25.7% of test occasions when laboratories performed VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo as their primary VWF test panel, but somewhat fewer occasions (10.9%) for laboratories that incorporated VWF:CB as an additional functional VWF assay. VWF assay sub-methodologies also influenced the appropriate identification of samples as potentially type 2 VWD, and VWF functional discordance was more consistently identified when laboratories used (i) automated platelet agglutination for VWF:RCo compared to classical platelet aggregometry, (ii) inhouse VWF:CB assays compared to commercial kit methods, and (iii) automated LIA-based ‘VWF:Activity’ assays compared to ELISA based assays.We conclude that:(i) laboratories are generally proficient in tests for VWD but interpretative diagnostic errors do occur; (ii) correct diagnosis is more likely when test panels are more comprehensive and include the VWF:CB; (iii) sub-methodology influences the appropriate identification of VWF functional discordance. On the basis of these findings, we provide a series of recommendations to enable the appropriate laboratory identification of VWD, in particular type 2B VWD.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of two von Willebrand factor concentrates [Biostate and AHF (High Purity)] in people with von Willebrand disorder

Plasma-derived factor concentrates are important in the management of von Willebrand disorder (VWD). In our geographic locality, a single viral inactivation step concentrate (AHF [High Purity]), has been replaced with one using a double viral inactivation step (Biostate®). The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) after administration of AHF (High Purity) and Biostate®. This study was a single-blind, randomised cross-over, multi-centre investigation in twelve people with VWD, comprising four type 3, two type 2B, one type 2M and five type 1 VWD. The subjects received a single infusion of 60 IU/kg ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) of either AHF (High Purity) or Biostate®, and after a minimum 15-day wash-out period they received the alternative product. Blood samples were collected for up to 48 hours after each dose for assay of FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) and VWF by VWF:RCo, collagen binding capacity (VWF:CB) and antigen (VWF:Ag). As a measure of delivered VWF ‘functionality’ we calculated the area-under-the-concentration-time-curve (AUC) ratios of VWF:RCo to VWF:Ag and VWF:CB to VWF:Ag. The effect on platelet adhesiveness by PFA-100 closure times (CTs) was measured prior to and 30 minutes post infusion. VWF multimers were also assessed pre and post infusion. Pharmacokinetic parameters after AHF (High Purity) and Biostate® were in close agreement for VWF:RCo (confirming dosing equivalence). Parameters for other study markers were also similar, although Biostate® tended to yield relatively lower VWF:Ag and higher VWF:CB levels. Although AHF (High Purity) and Biostate® resulted in similar levels of high-molecular-weight (HMW) multimers post-infusion, the relative level of HMW to low-molecular-weight (LMW) multimers were determined to be higher following Biostate®. The relative levels of functional VWF (i.e. VWF:CB and VWF:RCo) to VWF:Ag were also higher in Biostate® compared to AHF (High Purity). With both study products, PFA-100 CTs 30 minutes post infusion showed minor improvement for only some subjects. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics of FVIII:C and VWF are not significantly different after administration of AHF (High Purity) and Biostate®. Study parameters considered as ‘in-vitro’ markers of VWF ‘functionality’ or potential clinical efficacy (i.e. VWF:CB and VWF:RCo relative to VWF:Ag, level of HMW VWF relative to LMW-VWF) were determined to be higher for Biostate® than AHF (High Purity). PFA-100 CTs did not adequately reflect changes in these VWF parameters. Based on these results, one would expect Biostate® to be at least as effective, if not superior to AHF (High Purity) for the treatment of VWD.

Frequency of Platelet type versus Type 2B von Willebrand Disease

Less than 50 patients are reported with platelet type von Willebrand disease (PT-VWD) worldwide. Several reports have discussed the diagnostic challenge of this disease versus the closely similar disorder type 2B VWD. However, no systematic study has evaluated this dilemma globally. Over three years, a total of 110 samples/data from eight countries were analysed. A molecular approach was utilised, analysing exon 28 of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene, and in mutation negative cases the platelet GP1BA gene. Our results show that 48 cases initially diagnosed as putative type 2B/PT-VWD carried exon 28 mutations consistent with type 2B VWD, 17 carried GP1BA mutations consistent with a PT-VWD diagnosis, three had other VWD types (2A and 2M) and five expressed three non-previously published exon 28 mutations. Excluding 10 unaffected family members and one acquired VWD, 26 cases did not have mutations in either genes. Based on our study, the percentage of type 2B VWD diagnosis is 44% while the percentage of misdiagnosis of PT-VWD is 15%. This is the first large international study to investigate the occurrence of PT-VWD and type 2B VWD worldwide and to evaluate DNA analysis as a diagnostic tool for a large cohort of patients. The study highlights the diagnostic limitations due to unavailability/poor application of RIPA and related tests in some centres and proposes genetic analysis as a suitable tool for the discrimination of the two disorders worldwide. Cases that are negative for both VWF and GP1BA gene mutations require further evaluation for alternative diagnoses.

Evaluation of commercial von Willebrand factor collagen binding assays to assist the discrimination of types 1 and 2 von Willebrand disease

This study reports on the evaluation of seven commercial von Wille-brand factor (VWF) collagen binding (VWF:CB) assays to potentially assist the discrimination of types 1 and 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD). Samples from 25 patients with type 1 VWD, of varying severity, were co-tested with 16 samples from patients with types 2A or 2B VWD, plus various control samples, using each commercial VWF:CB assay assessed against our standard (reference) in-house VWF:CB assay, as well as our in-house VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assays. Commercial VWF:CB assays varied in their ability to discriminate types 1 and 2A/2B VWD. The optimal VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratio at which optimal discrimination occurred also differed between assays, with some improvements observed with some (but not all) as-says following a harmonisation process that aimed to correct for different calibrator effects. Assay variability also compromised assay utility in some test occasions. Future standardisation and improvements in some commercial VWF:CB assays are needed before the VWF:CB assay can be more fully and globally utilised for discrimination of VWD types in diagnostic laboratories.

Novel (Oral) Anticoagulant Challenges in Surgery

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are a relatively recent therapeutic modality for the prevention of systemic thromboembolic complications of atrial fibrillation and the prevention and management of venous thromboembolic disease. Approved indications for this class of anticoagulants are likely to further expand as the results of ongoing and new clinical trials are published and clinical experience grows. Despite their convenience compared with traditional methods of anticoagulation, there remain a few potential pitfalls associated with their use in the perioperative setting. In particular, there is limited experience and evidence base regarding anticoagulant management in the perioperative setting, especially given the different NOACs available, which in turn are different from the classical anticoagulants. This narrative review synthesizes the recent advances in development of specific NOAC reversal agents and the understanding of the complexities of laboratory measurement of NOAC anticoagulant effects, and aims to provide practicing clinicians with basic evidence-based tools for perioperative management of patients taking NOACs.

The Intriguing Link between the Intestinal Microbiota and Cardiovascular Disease

Human microbiota is a term conventionally used to define the normal flora of microbes living in all of us, most of which are resident in the gastrointestinal tract. Despite it having been known for some time that the vast majority of intestinal bacteria exert a strong influence on human life, recent technologic breakthroughs have made it possible to more accurately characterize the host microbial communities and explore their relationship with many human diseases. Notably, the evidence accumulated over the past 10 years suggests that a reasonable relationship can now be established between gut microbiota composition and the risk of cardiovascular disease. The most convincing information comes from data generated by studies involving trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO)-producing bacteria. It seems now clear that these bacterial strains may actively contribute to increase the concentration of endogenous TMAO and consequently enhance the risk of ischemic and thrombotic disorders, so opening intriguing scenarios for effective prevention of cardiovascular disease by targeting the intestine by means of diet, probiotics, prebiotics, antibiotics, or even transplantation of gut microbes.

Type 2M and Type 2A von Willebrand Disease: Similar but Different

Analogous to the differentiation between hemophilia A and B, respectively, reflecting deficiency in factor VIII (FVIII) and FIX, and increasing being recognized as reflecting clinically different disorders, types 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) can also be shown to express both similarities and differences in their prevalence, genetic defects, laboratory test results, clinical features, and treatment responses. In this narrative review, we explore these two “subtypes” of type 2 VWD, identifying parallels and dissimilarities in various aspects of their presentation to clinicians and to scientists/laboratories. This differential will become increasingly important as we strive to provide personalized approaches to future management of patients with VWD, particularly in the emerging landscape of recombinant von Willebrand factor.

Diagnostics of Inherited Bleeding Disorders of Secondary Hemostasis: An Easy Guide for Routine Clinical Laboratories

The investigation of inherited bleeding disorders of secondary hemostasis remains a challenge for most clinical laboratories, especially those that lack experience or specialized personnel. Bleeding can be essentially caused by a variety of acquired or congenital conditions, which impair either primary or secondary hemostasis. Since a universally agreed approach for the diagnostics of hemorrhagic disorders is still unavailable, this article aims to provide an easy guidance for routine clinical laboratories. This pragmatic approach to identifying and diagnosing inherited bleeding disorders of secondary hemostasis entails a multifaceted strategy, based on a collection of personal and family history, the results of first-line tests, which can then be followed by second- or third-line analyses to definitely establish the specific nature and the severity of the bleeding phenotype. Briefly, the presence of profound hemorrhages rather than mucocutaneous bleeding is suggestive of a disorder of secondary hemostasis. Although a positive family history is frequently reported in patients with congenital conditions, the lack of clinically meaningful symptoms in patient's relatives is not absolutely indicative of an acquired disorder. The next step encompasses the assessment of first-line coagulation tests (i.e., prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and fibrinogen) if family history is not suggestive of a specific factor deficiency. The emergence of abnormal data of these assays and the variable combination of their results is then helpful to guide the performance of second-line tests, in particular specific factor assays, which will then provide a reasonable basis for a preliminary diagnosis. Third-line tests (namely, immunological assays of clotting factors and molecular biology) are then supportive for a final diagnosis and for identifying the nature of the factor deficiency (i.e., quantitative or functional).