1
|
Ulker E, Caillaud M, Koseli E, Contreras K, Alkhlaif Y, Lindley E, Barik M, Ghani S, Bryant CD, Imad Damaj M. Comparison of Pain-Like behaviors in two surgical incision animal models in C57BL/6J mice. Neurobiol Pain 2022; 12:100103. [PMID: 36531613 PMCID: PMC9755018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2022.100103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of pain post-surgery is crucial for tissue healing in both veterinary and human medicine. Overuse of some analgesics such as opioids may lead to addictions and worsen pain syndromes (opioid-induced hyperalgesia), while underuse of it may affect the welfare of the patient. Therefore, the importance of using surgery models in laboratory animals is increasing, with the goal of improving our understanding of pain neurobiology and developing safer analgesics. METHODS We compared the widely used plantar incision model with the laparotomy surgery model and measured pain-related behaviors using both spontaneous and evoked responses in female and male C57BL/6J mice. Additionally, we assessed conditioned place preference (CPP) and sucrose preference tests to measure pain-induced motivation for the analgesic ketoprofen and anhedonia-like behavior. RESULTS Laparotomized mice showed increased abdominal sensitivity while paw-incised mice showed increased paw thermal and mechanical sensitivity up to seven days post-surgery. Laparotomy surgery reduced all spontaneous behaviors in our study however this effect dissipated by 24 h post-laparotomy. On the other hand, paw incision only reduced the percentage of cage hanging in a sex-dependent manner at 6 h post-incision. We also showed that both surgery models increased conditioned place preference for ketoprofen while preference for sucrose was only reduced at 24 h post-laparotomy. Laporatomy, but not paw incision, induced a decrease in body weight at 24 h post-surgery. Neither surgery model affected fluid intake. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that post-surgery hypersensitivity and behavioral deficits may differ by the incision site. Furthermore, factors associated with the surgery including length of the incision, duration of the anesthesia, and the layers that received stitches may affect subsequent spontaneous behaviors. These findings may help to improve drug development or the choice of the effective analgesic, depending on the surgery type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esad Ulker
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | - Martial Caillaud
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | - Eda Koseli
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | - Katherine Contreras
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | - Yasmin Alkhlaif
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | - Eric Lindley
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | - Mitali Barik
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | - Sofia Ghani
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | - Camron D. Bryant
- Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, USA
| | - M. Imad Damaj
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
- Translational Research Initiative for Pain and Neuropathy, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keane DF, Baxter P, Lindley E, Moissl U, Pavitt S, Rhodes L, Wieskotten S. The Body Composition Monitor: a flexible tool for routine fluid management across the haemodialysis population. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2017; 3. [PMID: 28824817 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aa6f45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Bioimpedance measurements with the Body Composition Monitor (BCM) have been shown to improve fluid management in haemodialysis. However, there is a lack of a sufficiently robust evidence-base for use of the BCM outside of standard protocols. This study aims to characterise BCM measurement variation to allow users to make measurements and interpret the results with confidence in a range of clinical scenarios. BCM measurements were made in 48 healthy controls and in 48 stable haemodialysis patients before and immediately after dialysis. The effect of utilising alternative measurement paths was assessed using mixed effects models and the effect of measuring post-dialysis was assessed by comparing changes in BCM-measured overhydration (OH) with weight changes over dialysis. The data from healthy controls suggest that there is no difference in BCM-measured OH between all the whole-body paths other than the foot-to-foot measurement. Dialysis patients showed similar results other than having higher BCM-measured OH when measured across the site of a vascular access. There was good agreement between BCM-measured OH and change in weight, suggesting post-dialysis measurements can be utilised. These results suggest BCM protocols can be flexible regarding measurement paths and timing of measurement to ensure as many patients as possible can benefit from the technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D F Keane
- Department of Renal Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, UK.,Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University Of Leeds, UK.,NIHR HTC Devices for Dignity, UK
| | - P Baxter
- Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University Of Leeds, UK
| | - E Lindley
- Department of Renal Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, UK.,NIHR HTC Devices for Dignity, UK
| | - U Moissl
- Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany
| | - S Pavitt
- School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, UK
| | - L Rhodes
- Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University Of Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goldsmith D, Covic A, Vervloet M, Cozzolino M, Nistor I, Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone Disease, Cozzolino M, Vervloet M, Brandenburg V, Bover J, Covic A, Evenepoel P, Goldsmith D, Massy Z, Mazzaferro S, Urena-Torres P, Abramowicz D, Bolignano D, Cannata Andia G, Cochat P, Covic A, Delvecchio L, Drechsler C, Eckardt KU, Fouque D, Fox J, Haller M, Heimburger O, Jager KJ, Lindley E, Marti Monros AM, Nagler E, Oberbauer R, Spasovski G, Tattersall J, Van Biesen W, vander Veer S, Vanholder R, Wanner C, Wheeler D, Whithers W, Wiecek A, Zoccali C. Should patients with CKD stage 5D and biochemical evidence of secondary hyperparathyroidism be prescribed calcimimetic therapy? An ERA-EDTA position statement. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015; 30:698-700. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfv050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
9
|
Fujii T, Suzuki S, Shinozaki M, Tanaka H, Bell S, Cooper S, Lomonte C, Libutti P, Chimienti D, Casucci F, Bruno A, Antonelli M, Lisi P, Cocola L, Basile C, Negri A, Del Valle E, Zanchetta M, Zanchetta J, Di Vico MC, Ferraresi M, Pia A, Aroasio E, Gonella S, Mongilardi E, Clari R, Moro I, Piccoli GB, Gonzalez-Parra E, Rodriguez-Osorio L, Ortiz-Arduan A, de la Piedra C, Egido J, Perez Gomez MV, Tabikh AA, Afsar B, Kirkpantur A, Imanishi Y, Yamagata M, Nagata Y, Ohara M, Michigami T, Yukimura T, Inaba M, Bieber B, Robinson B, Mariani L, Jacobson S, Frimat L, Bommer J, Pisoni R, Tentori F, Ciceri P, Elli F, Brancaccio D, Cozzolino M, Adamczak M, Wiecek A, Kuczera P, Sezer S, Bal Z, Tutal E, Kal O, Yavuz D, Y ld r m I, Sayin B, Ozelsancak R, Ozkurt S, Turk S, Ozdemir N, Lehmann R, Roesel M, Fritz P, Braun N, Ulmer C, Steurer W, Dagmar B, Ott G, Dippon J, Alscher D, Kimmel M, Latus J, Turkvatan A, Balci M, Mandiroglu S, Seloglu B, Alkis M, Serin M, Calik Y, Erkula S, Gorboz H, Afsar B, Mandiroglu F, Kirkpantur A, Lindley E, Cruz Casal M, Rogers S, Pancirova J, Kernc J, Copley JB, Fouque D, Kiss I, Kiss Z, Szabo A, Szegedi J, Balla J, Ladanyi E, Csiky B, orkossy O, Torok M, Turi S, Ambrus C, Deak G, Tisler A, Kulcsar I, K d r V, Altuntas A, Akp nar A, Orhan H, Sezer M, Filiopoulos V, Manolios N, Arvanitis D, Pani I, Panagiotopoulos K, Vlassopoulos D, Rodriguez-Ortiz ME, Canalejo A, Herencia C, Martinez-Moreno JM, Peralta-Ramirez A, Perez-Martinez P, Navarro-Gonzalez JF, Rodriguez M, Peter M, Gundlach K, Steppan S, Passlick-Deetjen J, Munoz-Castaneda JR, Almaden Y, Munoz-Castaneda JR, Peralta-Ramirez A, Rodriguez-Ortiz M, Herencia C, Martinez-Moreno J, Lopez I, Aguilera-Tejero E, Peter M, Gundlach K, Steppan S, Passlick-Deetjen J, Rodriguez M, Almaden Y, Hanafusa N, Masakane I, Ito S, Nakai S, Maeda K, Suzuki H, Tsunoda M, Ikee R, Sasaki N, Sato M, Hashimoto N, Wang MH, Hung KY, Chiang CK, Huang JW, Lu KC, Lang CL, Okano K, Yamashita T, Tsuruta Y, Hibi A, Miwa N, Kimata N, Tsuchiya K, Nitta K, Akiba T, Sasaki N, Tsunoda M, Ikee R, Sato M, Hashimoto N, Harb L, Komaba H, Kakuta T, Suzuki H, Suga T, Fukagawa M, Kikuchi H, Shimada H, Karasawa R, Suzuki M, Zhelyazkova-Savova M, Gerova D, Paskalev D, Ikonomov V, Zortcheva R, Galunska B, Jean G, Deleaval P, Hurot JM, Lorriaux C, Mayor B, Chazot C, Vannucchi H, Vannucchi MT, Martins JC, Merino JL, Teruel JL, Fernandez-Lucas M, Villafruela JJ, Bueno B, Gomis A, Paraiso V, Quereda C, Ibrahim FH, Fadhlina NZ, Ng EK, Thong KM, Goh BL, Sulaiman DM, Fatimah DAN, Evi DO, Siti SR, Wilson RJ, Keith M, Copley JB, Gros B, Galan A, Gonzalez-Parra E, Herrero JA, Oyaguez I, Keith M, Casado MA, Lucisano S, Coppolino G, Villari A, Cernaro V, Lupica R, Trimboli D, Aloisi C, Buemi M. CKD-MBD II. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gft149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
13
|
Ebah L, Oveland E, Read I, Summers A, Nikam M, Sayce A, Chaloner C, Dunn W, Wiig H, Brenchley P, Mitra S, Lindley E, Keane D, Charlie B, Jill H, Linda J, Jayne O, Elizabeth G, Perez de Jose A, Abad Esttebanez S, Verdalles Guzman U, Vega Martinez A, Bucalo Mana L, Rincon Bello A, Barraca D, Yuste Lozano C, Lopez-Gomez JM, Mancini E, Bolasco P, Severi S, Corazza L, Santoro A, Agar B, Leypoldt K, Akonur A, Hutchcraft A, Culleton B. Dialysis techniques and adequacy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfs200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|