[Transdiagnostic study of impulsivity dimensions. Comparative analysis of impulsivity profiles in adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder]

INTRODUCTION

High levels of impulsivity represent a core feature of various psychiatric conditions, such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), Impulse Control and Conduct Disorders, Bulimia Nervosa, Substance Use Disorders, and other maladaptive behaviors, like non-suicidal self-harm and suicidal behavior. The overall aim of our research is to carry out a trans-diagnostic study of impulsivity as a common behavioral risk factor, taking into consideration the different dimensions of impulsivity (motor, attentional, non-planning). The project investigates inhibitory neurocognitive deficits, electrophysiological correlates, childhood adversities and genetic vulnerability factors in the background of impulsivity.

METHODS

In this report, we describe the results of our pilot study which aims to compare impulsivity profiles, personality traits, and levels of aggression in patients with adult ADHD (aADHD) and BPD primary diagnoses, and healthy control subjects, based on self report questionnaires (Barratt Impulivity Scale, Cloninger Temperament and Character Inventory). We have also carried out analyses on the role of childhood adverse events in the background of impulsivity. Because of the predominance of female participants in the BPD group, we restrict our analyses to only female subjects (N=111 out of 152 patients overall).

RESULTS

Comparing the three groups significant differences were observed in each impulsivity domain: higher levels of attentional and motor impulsivity were present in aADHD, while non-planning impulsivity was more characteristic to BPD (p<0.001). Using the Cloninger Temperament and Character Inventory aADHD patients reached significant higher levels on six subscales (novelty seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependency, perseverance, selfdirection, cooperation) than BPD patients (p<001). Childhood emotional neglect results in higher levels of impulsivity in adulthood (R=0.54, p<0.001) regardless of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Impulsivity, as a diagnostic criterion of different psychiatric disorders is a heterogenous construct. Different characteristics of impulsivity are pronounced with respect to the condition it is part of. Studying impulsivity can improve our understanding of the etiology of different psychiatric conditions, which can result in more specific and effective therapeutic interventions.

[Clinical characteristics of children with Tourette's Syndrome]

INTRODUCTION

Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder presenting with motor and vocal tics. Although TS influences the everyday life of children, we only have fragmented knowledge on the topic of the developmental and comorbidity profile, symptom severity and genetical/environmental background. The aim of this article is to present the demographical characteristics, comorbidity profile and the tic symptom types and severity of patients from the Tourette Syndrome Outpatient Clinic of Vadaskert Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Hospital, Budapest.

METHODS

Our sample consists of all the patients (N=137), who visited the Tourette Syndrome Outpatient Clinic between February, 2012, and July, 2013. Patients were in the age range of 3 to 18 years. We recorded demographical and tic-specific data (age, symptom onset, TS in the family, comorbidity, adverse pre-/peri-/postnatal events) of the participants, and administered the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS).

RESULTS

The average age at symptom onset was 5.9 years. Average symptom severity (measured by the YGTSS) was 22.4 points. Comorbid Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) was reported in 31%, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) in 10%, and Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) in 10% of the sample. The most common tic types were simple head tics (blinking, shaking of head). Symptom severity correlated positively with age (p <0.05), but not with gender, age at symptom onset, positive family history for TS, or adverse pre-, peri-, and postnatal events.

CONCLUSION

The characteristics of our sample does not show any major differences from international reports of similar samples. Comorbidity is an exception: our sample shows lower rates of comorbidities than usually reported.