Consensus recommendations on dosing and administration of medical cannabis to treat chronic pain: results of a modified Delphi process

BACKGROUND

Globally, medical cannabis legalization has increased in recent years and medical cannabis is commonly used to treat chronic pain. However, there are few randomized control trials studying medical cannabis indicating expert guidance on how to dose and administer medical cannabis safely and effectively is needed.

METHODS

Using a multistage modified Delphi process, twenty global experts across nine countries developed consensus-based recommendations on how to dose and administer medical cannabis in patients with chronic pain.

RESULTS

There was consensus that medical cannabis may be considered for patients experiencing neuropathic, inflammatory, nociplastic, and mixed pain. Three treatment protocols were developed. A routine protocol where the clinician initiates the patient on a CBD-predominant variety at a dose of 5 mg CBD twice daily and titrates the CBD-predominant dose by 10 mg every 2 to 3 days until the patient reaches their goals, or up to 40 mg/day. At a CBD-predominant dose of 40 mg/day, clinicians may consider adding THC at 2.5 mg and titrate by 2.5 mg every 2 to 7 days until a maximum daily dose of 40 mg/day of THC. A conservative protocol where the clinician initiates the patient on a CBD-predominant variety at a dose of 5 mg once daily and titrates the CBD-predominant dose by 10 mg every 2 to 3 days until the patient reaches their goals, or up to 40 mg/day. At a CBD-predominant dose of 40 mg/day, clinicians may consider adding THC at 1 mg/day and titrate by 1 mg every 7 days until a maximum daily dose of 40 mg/day of THC. A rapid protocol where the clinician initiates the patient on a balanced THC:CBD variety at 2.5-5 mg of each cannabinoid once or twice daily and titrates by 2.5-5 mg of each cannabinoid every 2 to 3 days until the patient reaches his/her goals or to a maximum THC dose of 40 mg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, using a modified Delphi process, expert consensus-based recommendations were developed on how to dose and administer medical cannabis for the treatment of patients with chronic pain.

Heart, aging, and hypertension

Hypertension and aging adversely affect cardiovascular system and the heart is invariably involved. Manifestations of hypertensive heart disease and of the aging heart appear similar; ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, and impairments in ventricular function and coronary hemodynamics characterize both conditions. However, a great deal of evidence suggests that different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms may be involved. This report discusses most recent clinical and experimental findings and focuses on the alterations in nonmyocytic elements that are a part of heart involvement. Particular attention was given to factors that are responsible for exaggerated myocardial deposition of collagen that, by itself, may be responsible for ventricular dysfunction and impaired coronary hemodynamics in hypertensive and aging hearts. Newly developed therapeutical strategies, based on the most recent experimental and clinical studies, are also discussed.

Hypertension treatment in the new millennium: the importance of controlling systolic blood pressure and the pulse pressure

The sixth Joint National Committee on Hypertension (JNC-VI) has recently been published. The new criteria emphasize the importance of controlling systolic blood pressure and paying attention to the level of pulse pressure. The authors believe in the importance of controlling both in compliance with the new criteria established by JNC-VI.

Serotoninergic mechanisms in hypertension. Focus on the effects of ketanserin

Aggregating platelets release serotonin, which induces contraction of most vascular smooth muscle by activation of S2-serotoninergic receptors. Serotonin released in the circulation may contribute to the increase in peripheral resistance of hypertension as the responsiveness of blood vessels from hypertensive animals and humans to the vasoconstrictor action of the monoamine is augmented. The data obtained with the new antihypertensive agent ketanserin may favor that interpretation. Ketanserin is a selective S2-serotoninergic antagonist with additional alpha 1-adrenergic blocking properties. In humans, it has a terminal half-life of 12 to 25 hours and is eliminated predominantly by the liver. The hemodynamic profile of ketanserin is that of a vasodilator drug with actions on both resistance and capacitance vessels. On short-term intravenous administration, it lowers blood pressure in hypertensive patients with minimal reflex changes in cardiovascular function. When given orally long term to hypertensive patients, ketanserin causes a sustained reduction in arterial blood pressure, comparable to that obtained with either beta-adrenergic blockers or diuretics. Several studies have shown a greater efficacy in older (greater than 60 years of age) than in younger patients independent of starting pressure. Side effects mainly consist of dizziness, somnolence, and dry mouth, but they are usually not severe. The mechanism underlying the antihypertensive effect of ketanserin is unclear. It cannot be attributed to either S2-serotoninergic or alpha 1-adrenergic blockade alone, but an interaction between the two effects appears to be required.

Disparate cardiovascular effects of obesity and arterial hypertension

Since obesity and essential hypertension frequently coexist, a study was designed to analyze some of their cardiovascular effects. Twenty-eight obese patients, half of whom were normotensive and half with established hypertension, were matched for mean arterial pressure with 28 corresponding lean subjects. Systemic and renal hemodynamics, intravascular volume, plasma renin activity, and circulating catecholamine levels were measured. Obese patients had increased cardiac output (p less than 0.001), stroke volume (p less than 0.001), central blood volume (p less than 0.02), plasma and total blood volume (p less than 0.01), and decreased total peripheral resistance (p less than 0.001). In contrast, cardiac output, central blood volume, and stroke volume of hypertensive patients were normal, but they had increased total peripheral (p less than 0.001) and renal vascular resistance (p less than 0.001) and a contracted intravascular volume. Left ventricular stroke work was elevated to a similar level in obesity (p less than 0.001) and hypertension (p less than 0.02), but the increase was caused by an expanded stroke volume in the former and by an increase in systolic pressure in the latter. It is concluded that the disparate effects of obesity and hypertension on total peripheral resistance and intravascular volume counteract and may even offset each other. Thus, obesity may mitigate the effects of chronically elevated total peripheral resistance (and therefore end-organ damage) in essential hypertension. Since both entities affect the heart through different mechanisms, their presence in the same patient results in a double burden to the left ventricle, thereby gently enhancing the long-term risk of congestive failure.