1
|
Karacin C, Eren T, Zeynelgil E, Imamoglu GI, Altinbas M, Karadag I, Basal FB, Bilgetekin I, Sutcuoglu O, Yazici O, Ozdemir N, Ozet A, Yildiz Y, Esen SA, Ucar G, Uncu D, Dinc B, Aykan MB, Erturk İ, Karadurmus N, Civelek B, Çelik İ, Ergun Y, Dogan M, Oksuzoglu OB. Immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac vaccine in patients with cancer receiving active systemic therapy. Future Oncol 2021; 17:4447-4456. [PMID: 34342517 PMCID: PMC8336634 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac vaccine in patients with cancer receiving active systemic therapy. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted with 47 patients receiving active systemic therapy for cancer. CoronaVac was administered as two doses (3 μg/day) on days 0 and 28. Antibody level higher than 1 IU/ml was defined as 'immunogenicity.' Results: The immunogenicity rate was 63.8% (30/47) in the entire patient group, 59.5% (25/42) in those receiving at least one cytotoxic drug and 100% (five of five) in those receiving monoclonal antibody or immunotherapy alone. Age was an independent predictive factor for immunogenicity (odds ratio: 0.830; p = 0.043). Conclusion: More than half of cancer patients receiving active systemic therapy developed immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cengiz Karacin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training & Research Hospital, Rize, Turkey
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tulay Eren
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Esra Zeynelgil
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Goksen Inanc Imamoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Altinbas
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ibrahim Karadag
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Osman Sutcuoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozan Yazici
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuriye Ozdemir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Ozet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yesim Yildiz
- Department of Infectious Diseases & Clinical Microbiology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Selin Akturk Esen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ucar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dogan Uncu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bedia Dinc
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Turkish Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Musa Baris Aykan
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Gulhane Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İsmail Erturk
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Gulhane Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Gulhane Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burak Civelek
- Department of Medical Oncology, A Life Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İsmail Çelik
- Department of Preventive Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yakup Ergun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Batman Training & Research Hospital, Batman, Turkey
| | - Mutlu Dogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Omur Berna Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tokgoz S, Bugdayci Basal F. The Prognostic Effect of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio in Operated Gastric Cancer Patients. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2021; 30:1035-1040. [PMID: 33143823 DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.10.1035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the prognostic importance of metastatic lymph node ratio (MLNR) in operated gastric cancer patients. STUDY DESIGN Observational study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Health Sciences University, Yildirim Beyazit Diskapi Training and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Ankara, Turkey, between January 2014 and March 2019. METHODOLOGY Initially, record of a total of 171 patients, operated for gastric cancer, were retrieved. Inclusion criteria involved having gastric adenocarcinoma, undergoing curative-intent surgery, absence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, dissection of ≥15 lymph nodes, negative surgical margins, and no mortality within the first 30 days after surgery. Thirty patients were excluded for various reasons. Thus, clinicopathological features and prognostic factors including MLNR on overall and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated for the remaining 141 patients. RESULTS The median age of the 141 patients was 63 years (IQR: 54 - 72 years). The median MLNR was 0.18 (IQR: 0 - 0.47). The cut-off value with highest sensitivity and specificity was determined as 0.25 (area under the curve (AUC); 0.724, CI 95%; 0.639-0.808, p <0.001) in ROC curve analysis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed MLNR and perineural invasion (PNI) as independent prognostic factors. Patients with MLNR >0.25 had a 2.39-fold higher risk of disease progression, and 3.76-fold higher risk of shorter survival. CONCLUSION The study contributed to the literature that MLNR is practical and useful as an independent prognostic factor predicting survival even better than tumor/node/metastasis (TNM) staging system. Key Words: Gastric cancer, Metastatic lymph node ratio, Prognostic factor, Surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serhat Tokgoz
- Department of General Surgery, Yildirim Beyazit Diskapi Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bilgetekin I, Dogan M, Karacin C, Basal FB, Esin E, Ucar G, Isak OA, Imamoglu GI, Yildiran Keskin GS, Erturk I, Aktas BY, Kose Baytemur N, Aydin K, Ozturk SC, Aksel B, Karadurmus N, Kandemir O, Oksuzoglu B, Demirci U. The temporal evaluation of RAS and BRAF mutation by liquid biopsy at progression after bevacizumab combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e15587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e15587 Background: Expanded RAS analysis is essential for the selection of biologic agents in mCRC. RAS mutations indicates anti-EGFR unresponsiveness. In this study, we aimed to investigate RAS and BRAF mutations by liquid biopsy at progression in patients with RAS mutant mCRC. Methods: Sixty patients with mCRC who harbored tissue RAS mutations were prospectively analyzed between July 2019 and April 2020. All the patients treated with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab combinations . The plasma samples of the patients were analyzed after progression of bevacizumab combinations. RAS mutation profile was evaluated in plasma using Idylla PCR-based molecular diagnostics method, which enables rapid detection of common mutations in RAS and BRAF genes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and log-rank test was performed for comparison of groups. Results: The median age of the patients was 60 years (IQR:35-83 years) and female was (n=23, 38.3%). Primary tumor was located in the left colon in 81.7% of all patients. There were 95.0% KRAS and 5% NRAS mutations in baseline tissue biopsy. As a result of liquid biopsy after progression, 55.0% of the patients had KRAS, 3.3% NRAS and 3.3% had BRAF mutations. The RAS mutation detected in 58.3% of the patients. While there was no significant difference in terms of clinicopathological features between wild type (RAS/BRAF) and mutant type (RAS/BRAF) determined by liquid biopsy, the overall survival (OS) of the wild type group was significantly longer than mutant group (43.8 vs. 20.4 months, p= 0.002). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that there may be changes in RAS/BRAF mutation from plasma analysis after progression in patients with mCRC. Since better survival in the patient group with wild type was detected compared to the RAS concordance group, the evaluation of RAS mutation status at the time of progression may be important in terms of disease prognosis and treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Dogan
- Department of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cengiz Karacin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ece Esin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TN, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ucar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Aydin Isak
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Goksen Inanc Imamoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gul Sema Yildiran Keskin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ismail Erturk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burak Yasin Aktas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara 06100, Turkey, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Naziyet Kose Baytemur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Uskudar University, Ankara ,Turkey, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kubra Aydin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Uskudar University, Ankara ,Turkey, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Selcuk Cemil Ozturk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Uskudar University, Ankara ,Turkey, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bulent Aksel
- Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Olcay Kandemir
- Department of Pathology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berna Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Umut Demirci
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bugdayci Basal F, Karacin C, Bilgetekin I, Oksuzoglu OB. Can Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Create a New Perspective for the IMDC Scoring System in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma? Urol Int 2021; 105:666-673. [PMID: 33730725 DOI: 10.1159/000513456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to evaluate impact of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) on prognosis and survival within the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score groups. METHODS The records of 187 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were reviewed retrospectively. The SII was calculated as follows: SII = Neutrophil × Platelet/Lymphocyte. The patients were categorized into 2 groups based on a median SII of 730 (×109 per 1 L) as SII low (<730) and SII high (≥730). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and a Cox regression model was utilized to determine independent predictors of survival. RESULTS The median age was 61 years (range: 34-86 years). Kaplan-Meier tests revealed significant differences in survival between the SII-low and SII-high levels (27.0 vs. 12.0 months, respectively, p < 0.001). The Cox regression model revealed that SII was an independent prognostic factor. The implementation of the log-rank test in the IMDC groups according to the SII level provided the distinction of survival in the favorable group (SII low 49.0 months vs. SII high 11.0 months, p < 0.001), in the intermediate group (SII low 26.0 vs. SII high 15.0 months, p = 0.007), and in the poor group (SII low 19.0 vs. SII high 6.0 months, p = 0.019). CONCLUSION The SII was an independent prognostic factor and provided significant differences in survival for the favorable, intermediate, and poor IMDC groups. Thus, the SII added to the IMDC score may be clinically beneficial in predicting survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey,
| | - Cengiz Karacin
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Omur Berna Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bugdayci Basal F, Karacin C, Bilgetekin I, Oksuzoglu OB, Demirci U. Response to Trastuzumab Treatment and Number of Cycles ın Her2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer Survival. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2021; 30:1279-1284. [PMID: 33397053 DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.12.1279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effects of trastuzumab on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer. STUDY DESIGN Descriptive study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, from January 2012 to December 2019. METHODOLOGY Medical records of 33 HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer patients who had received trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy at least 6 cycles and/or followed by maintenance as the first-line treatment were examined. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Log-Rank test was used to compare survival times. The prognostic factors were determined by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS The median OS was 15.97 months, and the median PFS was 11.11 months. The median OS and PFS were significantly higher in those who demonstrated partial or complete response to trastuzumab combination treatment, and those who received more than 10 cycles of trastuzumab. A Cox regression analysis revealed that the risk of death was 3.18 times higher in patients with stable disease and 0.44 times lower in patients who received more than 10 cycles of trastuzumab as maintenance. CONCLUSION The OS time was prolonged when the partial and complete response was obtained with chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab, as well as OS and PFS times were improved with the increasing number of trastuzumab cycles. Thus, it is concluded that the response better than stable disease of trastuzumab treatment and an increased number of cycles predicts improved survival efficiently in patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer. Key Words: Metastatic gastric cancer, Trastuzumab, Prognosis, Response, Efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Turkey
| | - Cengiz Karacin
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Turkey
| | - Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Turkey
| | - Omur Berna Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Turkey
| | - Umut Demirci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Uskudar University, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bilgetekin I, Basal FB. Systemic Immune-inflammation Index is the Best Prognostic Factor in Patients with Advanced Stage Adenocarcinoma of the Lung Treated with Pemetrexed. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2020; 30:933-939. [PMID: 33036677 DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.09.933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic role of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients who received platin-pemetrexed combination therapy and/or maintenance pemetrexed therapy. STUDY DESIGN Observational study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology, Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, between January 2010 and March 2020. METHODOLOGY Data of patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung, who underwent platin-pemetrexed combination therapy and/or maintenance pemetrexed therapy retrospectively, were evaluated. Patient characteristics and disease parameters were recorded. Moreover, NLR, PLR, and SII were calculated. Survival analysis with the Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank test was performed. Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent prognostic factors of overall survivall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS In the univariate analyses, NLR-low group and SII-low group had significantly longer PFS compared to NLR-high and SII-high groups (10 months vs. 8 months, p=0.018, and 13 months vs. 8 months, p<0.001, respectively). The significant differences were seen between SII-low and SII-high groups for OS (24 months vs. 13 months, p=0.001). In multivariate analyses, response to treatment and low-SII were independent prognostic factors for PFS (HR: 0.25, p<0.001, and HR: 0.47, p=0.002, respectively) and OS (HR: 2.09, p=0.001, and HR: 2.05, p=0.001, respectively). Conclusion: SII is the most powerful of the three studied inflammatory indices, which could independently predict overall and progression-free survival. Key Words: Systemic immune-inflammation index, Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, Adenocarcinoma, Lung cancer, Pemetrexed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan, Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Department of Medical Oncology, HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan, Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bilgetekin I, Basal FB, Cinkir HY, Esin E, Oksuzoglu B, Demirci U. Enzalutamide Treatment in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Before and after Docetaxel. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2020; 30:815-821. [PMID: 32893792 DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.08.815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in docetaxel-naive and docetaxel-pretreated patients. STUDY DESIGN Observational study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY HSU Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey, from March 2017 to July 2019. METHODOLOGY A total of 67 patients with mCRPC were retrospectively evaluated. Castration-naive patients and non-metastatic patients were excluded from the study. Comorbid diseases, ECOG performance status, PSA response, and the radiological response of the patients were recorded. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and a Cox regression model was formed. RESULTS The overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in patients with eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 (26.0 vs. 14.0 months, p=0.031), PSA response (26.0 vs. 7.0 months, p=0.002), radiological response (26.0 vs. 10.0 months, p=0.006) and duration of enzalutamide ≥9 months (26.0 vs. 7.0 months, p<0.001) compared to ECOG PS 1. According to Cox regression analysis, patients with PSA response had 0.35 fold (CI.95% 0.13-0.94) reduced the risk of death and 0.36-fold (CI.95%0.16-0.85) reduced the risk of progression compared to those without PSA response. Moreover, longer enzalutamide treatment (≥9 months) was noted to decrease the risk of death. CONCLUSION PSA response, radiological response and duration of enzalutamide treatment may predict the improvement of survival in patients with mCRPC treated with enzalutamide. Key Words: Enzalutamide, Docetaxel, Castration-resistant prostate cancer, Overall survival, Progression-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Havva Yesil Cinkir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gaziantep University Medical Faculty Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Ece Esin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berna Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Umut Demirci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bilgetekin I, Erturk I, Basal FB, Karacin C, Karadurmus N, Oksuzoglu B, Demirci U. Tolvaptan treatment in hyponatremia due to the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH): effects on survival in patients with cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 2020; 53:301-307. [PMID: 32869173 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02623-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with hyponatremia who received supportive treatment or tolvaptan plus supportive treatment and the effects of treatment and other variables on overall survival METHODS: This study included oncology patients who were hospitalized at two oncology centers between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019 for hyponatremia (sodium levels < 135 mEq/L) and who received tolvaptan plus supportive treatment (n = 22) or supportive treatment only (n = 42). RESULTS The median age of all the patients was 59 years (range 26-85) and 64.1% of the patients were male. There was no statistically significant difference between patients in the tolvaptan plus supportive treatment (TpST) group and the supportive treatment only (ST) group in terms of gender and age (p > 0.05). In the TpST group, recovery days of the hyponatremia after treatment and the length of hospital stay was shorter and hyponatremia symptoms and hospital complications were less frequent compared to the ST group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the TpST group and the ST group in terms of overall survival (OS). OS was shorter in men who were non-responders to hyponatremia treatment and had recurrent hyponatremia. Multivariable analysis showed that normal sodium levels after treatment decreased the risk of death. CONCLUSION In the treatment of hyponatremia in cancer patients, TpST was found to have more positive effects on blood sodium levels, length of hospital stay, hospital complications, and hyponatremia symptoms compared to ST. A decreased risk of death was observed in patients with normal sodium levels after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ismail Erturk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cengiz Karacin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Nuri Karadurmus
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berna Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Umut Demirci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Uskudar University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Peled N, Gillis R, Kilickap S, Froesch P, Orlov S, Filippova E, Demirci U, Christopoulos P, Cicin I, Basal FB, Yilmaz C, Fedor M, Korkmaz T, Paydas S, Gautschi O, Zirtiloglu A, Eralp Y, Cinkir HY, Sezer A, Erman M, Tural D, Turna H, Mazieres J, Dudnik E, Reguart N, Camidge DR, Ng TL, Şenler FÇ, Beypınar İ, Yazılıtaş D, Demirkazık A, Karaoğlu A, Okutur K, Coşkun HŞ, Şendur MAN, Isikdogan A, Cabuk D, Yumuk PF, Yıldız I, Kaplan MA, Özyılkan Ö, Öztop İ, Olmez OF, Aydin K, Aydıner A, Meydan N, Grinberg RD, Roisman LC. GLASS: Global Lorlatinib for ALK(+) and ROS1(+) retrospective Study: real world data of 123 NSCLC patients. Lung Cancer 2020; 148:48-54. [PMID: 32799090 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Lorlatinib is a third-generation tyrosine-kinases inhibitor (TKI) targeting ALK/ROS1 fusions. The FDA has approved lorlatinib for TKI-pretreated ALK(+) NSCLC, while its approval for ROS1(+) is still pending. Here we present the largest real-world data of NSCLC patients harboring ALK/ROS1 rearrangements treated with lorlatinib. METHODS 123 patients were enrolled retrospectively (data cut-off 1/1/2019). Lorlatinib was administered through an early access program for patients with no other available therapy. Outcome and response were defined by each investigator upon RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS 106 ALK(+) and 17 ROS1(+) patients recruited from 8 different countries. The ALK(+) cohort included 50 % males, 73 % never-smokers and 68 % with brain metastases. Extracranial (EC) and intracranial (IC) response rates (RR) were 60 % and 62 %, with disease control rates (DCR) of 91 % and 88 % respectively. Mean duration of therapy (DoT) was 23.9 ± 1.6 months and median overall survival (mOS) was 89.1 ± 19.6 months. ROS1 cohort enrolled 53 % males, 65 % never-smokers and 65 % had brain metastases. EC and IC RR were 62 % and 67 % with DCR of 92 % and 78 % respectively. Median DoT was 18.1 ± 2.5 months and mOS of 90.3 ± 24.4 months. OS and DoT in both cohorts were not significantly correlated with line of therapy nor other parameters. The most common adverse events of any grade were peripheral edema (48 %), hyperlipidemia (47 %), weight gain (25 %) and fatigue (30 %). CNS adverse events such as cognitive effect of grade 1-2 were reported in 18 % of patients. CONCLUSION Lorlatinib shows outstanding EC/IC efficacy in ALK/ROS1(+) NSCLC. The observed mOS of 89 ± 19 months in ALK(+) NSCLC supports previous reports, while mOS from of 90 ± 24 months is unprecedented for ROS1(+) NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nir Peled
- The Legacy Heritage Oncology Center & Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
| | - Roni Gillis
- The Legacy Heritage Oncology Center & Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Saadettin Kilickap
- Department of Preventive Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Patrizia Froesch
- Oncology Institute of the Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Sergei Orlov
- Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Elena Filippova
- Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Umut Demirci
- Uskudar University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Turkey
| | - Petros Christopoulos
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, and Translational Lung Research Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - Irfan Cicin
- Trakya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Turkey
| | - Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- University of Health Sciences, Dr. A.Y. Ankara Oncology Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Turkey
| | - Cengiz Yilmaz
- Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Moiseenko Fedor
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, 197798, Russian Federation; St. PetersburgClinical Research and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncologic), St. Petersburg, 197758, Russian Federation
| | - Taner Korkmaz
- Acibadem MAA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Maslak Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Semra Paydas
- Department of Oncology, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
| | - Oliver Gautschi
- University of Berne and Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Alisan Zirtiloglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yesim Eralp
- Acibadem MAA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Maslak Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Havva Yesil Cinkir
- Gaziantep University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Sezer
- Adana Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Adana, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Erman
- Department of Preventive Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Deniz Tural
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hande Turna
- Cerrahpasa University, Faculty of Medicine Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Julien Mazieres
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Elizabeth Dudnik
- Thoracic Cancer Service, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, 49100, Israel
| | - Noemi Reguart
- Division of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona,Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Ross Camidge
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1665 North Aurora Court, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Terry L Ng
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Filiz Çay Şenler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey
| | - İsmail Beypınar
- Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Doğan Yazılıtaş
- Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Demirkazık
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon, Turkey
| | - Aziz Karaoğlu
- Medicalpark Bahçelievler Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kerem Okutur
- Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Hasan Şenol Coşkun
- Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | | | - Abdurrahman Isikdogan
- Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Devrim Cabuk
- Kocaeli University, Division of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Perran Fulden Yumuk
- Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ibrahim Yıldız
- Acibadem MAA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Maslak Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - M Ali Kaplan
- Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Özgür Özyılkan
- Adana Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Adana, Turkey
| | - İlhan Öztop
- Medicalpark Bahçelievler Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Omer Fatih Olmez
- Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Adnan Aydıner
- Istanbul University Institute of Cancer, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nezih Meydan
- Adnan Menderes Univesity Faculty of Medicine, Turkey
| | - Roxana Denisa Grinberg
- The Legacy Heritage Oncology Center & Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Laila C Roisman
- The Legacy Heritage Oncology Center & Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel; Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Karacin C, Bilgetekin I, Basal FB, Oksuzoglu OB. Prognostic Importance of Metastatic Site in Intermediate-risk Group Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2020; 30:590-594. [PMID: 32703342 DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.06.590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the prognostic importance of the metastatic site in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate-risk. STUDY DESIGN Observational study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Department of Medical Oncology, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, from January 2010 to November 2018. METHODOLOGY Records of 113 mRCC patients, determined to be in the intermediate-risk group according to IMDC criteria, were reviewed retrospectively. All patients used a tyrosine kinase inhibitor - sunitinib or pazopanib - for metastatic disease. Patients' records included age, gender, metastatic site, number of metastases and treatment regimen. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and a Cox regression model was formed. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 58 years (Q1 - Q3: 44 - 66 years) and 87.6% of the patients had ≥2 metastatic sites. The most common metastatic sites were the lung (51.3%), lymph nodes (26.5%), bone (26.5%) and brain (17.7%). Median overall survival (OS) was shorter in the patients with bone and brain metastasis than in those without (15.0 months vs. 21.0 months, p = .026 and 14.0 months vs. 21.0 months, p = .009, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that brain and bone metastasis were independent prognostic risk factors (HR: 2.43, p = .017 and HR: 2.10, p = .042, respectively). CONCLUSION Bone and brain metastasis had a negative effect on OS in IMDC intermediate-risk group mRCC patients. Key Words: Metastatic site, Brain metastasis, Bone metastasis, Renal cell carcinoma, Prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cengiz Karacin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Irem Bilgetekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Omur Berna Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Demirci U, Bugdayci Basal F, Aslan F, Erdur E, Demirci A, Ozatli T, Oksuzoglu B. Multimodality treatment for esophageal cancer in Turkey: A single center experience. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e15507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e15507 Background: Esophagus cancer is an important cause of cancer-related deaths in Turkey as well as in the world. In our study, clinicopathological features and survival results of patients treated for esophageal cancer were presented. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients who were admitted to our center, between 2012 and 2016. Results: A total of 82 patients (56 males) with a median age of 56 years were evaluated. Seventy-one (87%) patients were diagnosed with SCC, 10 (12%) with ADC, 1 with adenosquamous carcinoma. All ADC patients were HER2 negative. The localization of tumors; lower third (55%), middle third (27%) and upper third (18%) of the esophagus. Prior to surgery, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was administered in 21 patients (26%); 10 of them receiving carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP), and 11 receiving cisplatin and 5-FU (CF). TNM classification of operated patients were as follows; Stage 1 (n = 5), stage 2 (n = 10), stage 3 (n = 8) and stage 4 (n = 1). Adjuvant chemotherapy (CF) was administered in the other 6 (7%) patients. Definitive CRT was given in 36 patients (44%), with CF being administered in 32 patients, and CP therapy in 4 patients. There were 19 patients (23%) with metastatic diagnosis and 13 of whom were treated with CF, and 4 with docetaxel-cisplatin-5FU combination. With median follow up of 21 months, median overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were 24 and 17 months, respectively. The median OS and TTP of patients with metastatic disease were 14 and th 9 months, respectively. The median OS and TTP of the patients who underwent surgery were 45 and 34 months, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings in this study regarding the rate of histology, the percentages of patients with metastatic vs. locally advanced disease, and survival rates were similar to the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umut Demirci
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ferit Aslan
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Erkan Erdur
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ayse Demirci
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tahsin Ozatli
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Berna Oksuzoglu
- Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abali H, Yalcin S, Onal HC, Dane F, Oksuzoglu B, Ozdemir N, Mertsoylu H, Artac M, Camci C, Karabulut B, Bugdayci Basal F, Budakoglu B, Sendur MAN, Goktas B, Ozdener F, Calisgan A. A study of the combination of oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and herceptin (trastuzumab) and chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant setting in operated patients with HER2+ gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer (TOXAG study). J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.tps182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS182 Background: Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy has been shown to prolong survival of HER2+ esophago-gastric cancer patients. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate safety and tolerability of trastuzumab (T) in combination with oxaliplatine (O), capecitabine (C) and radiation (R) therapy in the adjuvant setting in curatively resected esophago-gastric cancer patients. Methods: Forty patients with IB or higher stages was planned to be recruited and here we report the interim analyses on 22. We would consider the study positive if at least 64.4% of patients could tolerate the therapy. Eligible patients received T 8 mg/kg intravenously (iv) on Day 1 of cycle 1 and 6 mg/kg iv on day 1 of every following 3-weekly cycle for 1 year as 17 cycles, with O 100 mg/m2 iv on Day 1 of cycles 1-3 and C 850 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14 of cycles 1-3 and on 5 days per week during chemo-radiotherapy. R was given at a total dose of 45 Gy divided into 25 doses on 5 treatment days per week for 5 weeks starting from the 1st day of cycle 4. Results The median age was 57.5 years (Min-Max: 35-74). Of 22 patients; 15 were male (68.2%), 21 (95.5%) had an ECOG PS score ≤ 1, 21 (95.5%) had D2 lymph node resection. There were 11 serious adverse events. Two patients died on therapy; 1 secondary to pulmonary thrombo-emboli, and the other had to cerebral ischemia (thought to be due to Behçet’s disease), and 7 died of progression. There were 6 dose reductions (1 for T, 2 for O and 3 for C), T was stopped in 1 patient, C was interrupted 8 times (mostly during radiotherapy). Patients who have completed 3 cycles of O, C, T and 4th and 5th cycles of chemo-radiation therapy with C and T were defined as tolerable. Out of 22 patients, 19 (86.4%) were tolerable (Chi Square test: p = 0.0623). Median survival time for interim analysis patients (n = 22) was 22 months (95% CI: 11-23 months). Conclusion T in combination with O, C and chemo-radiation with C and T was tolerable with the tolerability rate of 86.4%, in curatively resected HER2 + esophago-gastric cancer adjuvant treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT01748773.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Berna Oksuzoglu
- Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Onkoloji Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nuriye Ozdemir
- Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Mehmet Artac
- Necmettin Erbakan University Meram School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey
| | | | | | - Fatma Bugdayci Basal
- Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Onkoloji Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burcin Budakoglu
- Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Onkoloji Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Nahit Sendur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|