Multicenter retro-prospective observational study on chronic hypoparathyroidism and rhPTH (1-84) treatment

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of 12 months of rhPTH (1-84) (Natpar^®) treatment in a cohort of patients selected according to the indications of hypoparathyroidism guidelines. The use of recombinant human PTH (1-84) [rhPTH (1-84)] is approved as hormonal replacement therapy in patients with hypoparathyroidism not adequately controlled with conventional therapy.

METHODS

It is a multicenter, observational, retro-prospective, open label study. Eleven Italian Endocrinological centers, members of Hypoparathyroidism Working Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology (HypoparaNET) were involved. Main outcome measures were serum and urinary calcium and phosphate concentration, calcium-phosphate product, renal function, oral calcium and vitamin D doses, and clinical manifestations.

RESULTS

Fourteen adult subjects, affected by chronic hypoparathyroidism, were treated with rhPTH (1-84) for 12 months. At 12 months of rhPTH (1-84) treatment, 61.5% of patients discontinued calcium supplement and 69.2% calcitriol. Mean albumin-adjusted total serum calcium levels quickly normalized after initiation of rhPTH (1-84) treatment compared to baseline (p = 0.009), remaining in the normal range until 12 months. Rare hypo-hypercalcemia episodes were reported. Renal function was maintained normal and no renal complications were reported. Serum and urinary phosphate and urinary calcium were maintained in the normal range. Mean phosphatemia levels linearly decreased from 3 months up to 12 months compared to baseline (p = 0.014). No severe adverse events were described.

CONCLUSIONS

Biochemical and clinical results confirm the efficacy and safety of rhPTH (1-84) therapy, which represents an important option for hypoparathyroid patients unresponsive to conventional therapy.

First but not second postoperative day growth hormone assessments as early predictive tests for long-term acromegaly persistence

PURPOSE

Postoperative assessment of acromegaly activity is typically performed at least 3 months after neurosurgery (NS). Few studies have evaluated the use of early postoperative growth hormone (GH) levels as a test to predict short- and long-term remission of acromegaly. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum random GH on a postoperative day one (D1-rGH) and two (D2-rGH), particularly in predicting long-term disease persistence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-one subjects with acromegaly who were undergoing NS were enrolled (mean age ± SD 47.4 ± 13.1 years at diagnosis; women 54%; macroadenomas 71%). The final assessment of disease activity was performed one year after NS. ROC curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of D1-rGH and D2-rGH.

RESULTS

After a 1-year follow-up, the overall remission rate was 55%. ROC analysis identified an optimal D1-rGH cut-off value of 2.1 ng/mL for diagnosing long-term disease persistence (55.6% SE; 90.9% SP). The cut-off point became 2.5 ng/mL after maximizing specificity for disease persistence (yielding a 100% positive predictive value) and 0.3 ng/mL after maximizing sensitivity for disease remission. The optimal D2-rGH cut-off value was 0.6 ng/mL (81.8% SE; 50% SP); the cut-off point became 2.9 ng/mL after maximizing specificity and 0.1 ng/mL after maximizing sensitivity, with no clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

D1-rGH could be a highly specific test for the early diagnosis of long-term acromegaly persistence, which is predicted by a value > 2.5 ng/mL with a great degree of certainty. The diagnostic performance of D2-rGH was insufficient. Further research is required to validate these preliminary results prior to modifying the postoperative management of acromegaly.

Increased prevalence of impulse control disorder symptoms in endocrine diseases treated with dopamine agonists: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Impulse control disorders (ICDs) have been described as a side effect of dopamine agonists (DAs) in neurological as well as endocrine conditions. Few studies have evaluated the neuropsychological effect of DAs in hyperprolactinemic patients, and these have reported a relationship between DAs and ICDs. Our objective was to screen for ICD symptoms in individuals with DA-treated endocrine conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 132 patients with pituitary disorders treated with DAs (DA exposed), as well as 58 patients with pituitary disorders and no history of DA exposure (non-DA exposed). Participants responded to the full version of the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's disease (QUIP).

RESULTS

Compared with the non-DA-exposed group, a higher prevalence of DA-exposed patients tested positive for symptoms of any ICD or related behavior (52% vs. 31%, p < 0.01), any ICD (46% vs. 24%, p < 0.01), any related behavior (31% vs. 17%, p < 0.05), compulsive sexual behavior (27% vs. 14%, p < 0.04), and punding (20% vs. 7%, p < 0.02) by QUIP. On univariate analysis, DA treatment was associated with a two- to threefold increased risk of any ICD or related behavior [odds ratio (OR) 2.43] and any ICD (OR 2.70). In a multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for any ICD or related behavior were DA use (adjusted OR 2.22) and age (adjusted OR 6.76). Male gender was predictive of the risk of hypersexuality (adjusted OR 3.82).

DISCUSSION

Despite the QUIP limitations, a clear sign of increased risk of ICDs emerges in individuals with DA-treated pituitary disorders. Our data contribute to the growing evidence of DA-induced ICDs in endocrine conditions.

Usefulness of an ad hoc questionnaire (Acro-CQ) for the systematic assessment of acromegaly comorbidities at diagnosis and their management at follow-up

PURPOSE

To determine the validity of a self-administered questionnaire (Acro-CQ) developed to systematically assess the presence, type and time of onset of acromegaly comorbidities.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study; 105 acromegaly patients and 147 controls with other types of pituitary adenoma, referred to a specialized Italian Center, autonomously compiled Acro-CQ in an outpatient clinical setting. To test its reliability in a different setting, Acro-CQ was administered via mail to 78 patients with acromegaly and 100 with other pituitary adenomas, referred to a specialized US Center. Data obtained from questionnaires in both settings were compared with medical records (gold standard).

RESULTS

Demographics of patients and controls from both countries were similar. In both settings, >95 % of the questionnaires were completely filled; only one item was missed in the others. Concordance with medical record was excellent (k > 0.85) for most of the items, independently from the way of administration, patient age, gender and nationality, pituitary adenoma type and disease activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Acro-CQ is an inexpensive, highly accepted from patients and reliable tool recommended to expedite systematic collection of relevant clinical data in acromegaly at diagnosis, to be replicated at follow-ups. This tool may guide a targeted, cost-effective management of complications. Moreover, it could be applied to retrieve data for survey studies in both acromegaly and other pituitary adenomas, as information is easily and rapidly accessible for statistical analysis.

Effects of chronic slow release-lanreotide treatment on insulin-like growth factor system and metabolic parameters in acromegalic patients

Insulin and IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 are linked by negative association. Somatostatin (SS) reduces insulin secretion by acting on pancreatic β-cell and also by decreasing GH secretion. SS analogues in acromegaly reduce total IGF-I levels inhibiting GH hypersecretion, but they also reduce free IGF-I bioactivity increasing IGFBP-1 levels by inducing insulin decrease. In 13 acromegalic patients we studied GH, IGF system, insulin, and glucagon levels at baseline and at 7 days, 1 and 6 months under treatment with slow release (SR)-lanreotide (LAN) (60 mg im monthly). The hormonal and metabolic response to arginine (ARG) (0.5 g/kg iv in 30 min) was also studied at each time point. LAN decreased GH, total IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 levels at each time point. Insulin and glucagon levels were reduced, while IGFBP-1 and free IGF-I levels were increased by LAN at day 7 and after 1 month only. LAN did not modify the GH, insulin, glucagon, glucose, and IGFBP-1 responses to ARG. At each time point ARG-induced insulin increase was coupled to increase in glucagon and IGFBP-1 levels. This study shows that acromegalic patients under chronic treatment with LAN display: a) inhibition of GH and total IGF-I levels, not coupled to persistent decrease in free IGF-I levels; b) persistent decrease in IGFBP- 3 but transient decrease and increase in insulin and IGFBP- 1, respectively; c) unchanged hormonal and metabolic response to ARG. Our findings also show that ARG stimulates IGFBP-1 despite marked increase in insulin secretion; this escape from the negative relationship linking insulin and IGFBP- 1 would likely reflect the ARG-induced glucagon increase.

Retesting the childhood-onset GH-deficient patient

GH deficiency (GHD) in adults has to be shown by a single provocative test, provided that it is validated. Insulin tolerance test (ITT) has been indicated as the test of choice; now also glucagon test is validated and represents an alternative. The GHRH plus arginine (ARG) test and testing with GHRH plus a GH secretagogue are equally reliable diagnostic tools, and are now considered as 'golden' standards as ITT. Childhood-onset (CO) GHD needs retesting in late adolescence or young adulthood; this is a major clinical challenge and raises questions about the most appropriate method and cut-off value. Appropriate re-evaluation of GH status is represented by simple measurement of IGF1 concentration off rhGH treatment. Clearly, low IGF1 levels are evidence of persistent severe GHD in subjects with genetic GHD or panhypopituitarism. However, normal IGF1 levels never rule out severe GHD and CO-GHD with normal IGF1 levels must undergo a provocative test. The appropriate GH cut-off limit is specific for each provocative test. As shown by the ROC curve analysis, in late adolescents and young adults, the lowest normal GH peak response to ITT is 6.1 microg/l while that to GHRH+ARG test is 19.0 microg/l. These cut-off limits, however, are just indicative as being variable as a function of the assay used. No other test is validated for retesting. As GHRH+ARG test mostly explores the GH-releasable pool, normal GH response would be verified by a second ITT in order to rule out subtle hypothalamic defect.

Growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor I axis, glucose metabolism, and lypolisis but not leptin show some degree of refractoriness to short-term fasting in acromegaly

Starvation exerts critical influence on somatotroph and leptin secretion. Fasting enhances GH levels in normal subjects, but not in GH hyposecretory states, while it always inhibits leptin secretion. We aimed to clarify the GH/IGF-I and metabolic response to short-term fasting in a GH hypersecretory state such as acromegaly. To this goal, in 8 active acromegalic (ACRO) and in 7 normal women (NS) we evaluated mean GH (mGHc), leptin (mLEPc), insulin (mINSc), glucose (mGLUc) concentrations as well as IGF-I, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3, IGFBP-1, and free fatty acid (FFA) levels before and after 36-h fasting. Before fasting, mGHc, IGF-I, mINSc, mGLUc, and FFA levels in ACRO were higher (p<0.01) than in NS. IGFBP-3, IGFBP-1, and mLEPc were similar in ACRO and in NS. Fasting clearly (p<0.02) increased mGHc in NS only. After 36-h fasting, significant IGF-I reduction was recorded in NS only (p<0.03). IGFBP-3 did not change both in ACRO and NS. IGFBP-1 significantly increased (p<0.05) after fasting in both groups but in ACRO were lower (p<0.03) than in NS. Fasting decreased (p<0.03) mLEPc, mGLUc, and mINSc in ACRO as well as in NS; mINSc and mGLUc after fasting in ACRO persisted higher (p<0.005) than in NS. FFA levels were increased by fasting in NS (p<0.02), but not in ACRO. This study shows that GH/IGF-I axis, glucose metabolism, and lypolisis but not leptin display some degree of refractoriness to short-term fasting in acromegaly. The lack of any GH response to fasting in acromegaly would likely reflect neuroendocrine alterations secondary to the GH hypersecretory state. On the other hand, the lack of somatotropic response and the peculiarly blunted metabolic reaction to short-term fasting would partially reflect the delayed adaptation of insulin resistance to starvation.

Update on epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency

The most updated guidelines for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD) come from the GH Research Society Consensus Workshop held in Sydney, Australia, in 2007. Regarding who to test for GHD, advice should be extended from primitive hypothalamic- pituitary diseases and cranial irradiation to include brain injuries (Traumatic Brain Injury in particular). Regarding how to test for GHD, the insulin tolerance test (ITT) remains a provocative test of reference; among classical provocative test, glucagon test has also been validated. Above all, GHRH + arginine and GHRH + GH-secretagogues are now considered, at least, as reliable as ITT for the diagnosis of adult GHD. Interestingly, it is now accepted that very low IGF-I represents definite evidence of severe GHD in congenital forms of GHD and also in patients with acquired multiple hypopituitarism. These patients would skip provocative test; however, as normal IGFI levels do not rule out severe GHD, patients suspected for hypopituitarism showing normal IGF-I levels must undergo a provocative test of GH secretion. Retesting the GH status in the transition age is of major relevance in order to decide about continuing or not recombinant human GH replacement in adult life.

Diagnosis of adult GH deficiency

Based on previous consensus statements, it has been widely accepted that the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) must be shown biochemically by provocative tests of GH secretion; in fact, the measurement of IGF-I as well as of other markers was considered unable to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. The Insulin Tolerance Test (ITT) was indicated as that of choice and severe GHD defined by a GH peak lower than 3 microg/l. It is now recognized that, although normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD, very low IGF-I levels in patients highly suspected for GHD (i.e. patients with childhood-onset severe GHD or with multiple hypopituitarism acquired in adulthood) can be considered as definite evidence for severe GHD. However, patients suspected for adult GHD with normal IGF-I levels must be investigated by provocative tests. ITT remains a test of reference but it should be recognized that other tests are as reliable as ITT. Glucagon as classical test and, particularly, new maximal tests such as GHRH in combination with arginine or GH secretagogues (GHS) (i.e. GHRP-6) have well defined cut-off limits, are reproducible, able to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. Overweight and obesity have confounding effect on the interpretation of the GH response to provocative tests. In adults cut-off levels of GH response below which severe GHD is demonstrated must be appropriate to lean, overweight and obese subjects to avoid false positive diagnosis in obese adults and false negative diagnosis in lean GHD patients.