T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination differ by disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis

Immune responses in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been of significant interest throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Lymphocyte-targeting immunotherapies including anti-CD20 treatments and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators attenuate antibody responses after vaccination. Evaluation of cellular responses after vaccination is therefore of particular importance in these populations. In this study, we analysed CD4 and CD8 T cell functional responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides in healthy controls and pwMS on five different DMTs by flow cytometry. Although pwMS on rituximab and fingolimod therapies had low antibody responses after both two and three vaccine doses, T cell responses in pwMS on rituximab were preserved after a third vaccination, even when an additional dose of rituximab was administered between vaccine doses two and three. PwMS taking fingolimod had low detectable T cell responses in peripheral blood. CD4 and CD8 T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern Delta and Omicron were lower than to the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 variant. Our results indicate the importance of assessing both cellular and humoral responses after vaccination and suggest that even in the absence of robust antibody responses vaccination can generate immune responses in pwMS.

Determinants of humoral and cellular immune responses to three doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in older adults: a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

Older age is associated with poorer outcomes to COVID-19 infection. The Norwegian Institute of Public Health established a longitudinal cohort of adults aged 65-80 years to study the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we describe the characteristics of the cohort in general, and specifically the immune responses at baseline and after primary and booster vaccination in a subset of longitudinal blood samples, and the epidemiological factors affecting these responses.

METHODS

4551 participants were recruited, with humoral (n=299) and cellular (n=90) responses measured before vaccination and after two and three vaccine doses. Information on general health, infections, and vaccinations were obtained from questionnaires and national health registries.

FINDINGS

Half of the participants had a chronic condition. 849 (18·7%) of 4551 were prefrail and 184 (4%) of 4551 were frail. 483 (10·6%) of 4551 had general activity limitations (scored with the Global Activity Limitation Index). After dose two, 295 (98·7%) of 299 participants were seropositive for anti-receptor binding domain IgG, and 210 (100%) of 210 participants after dose three. Spike-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses showed high heterogeneity after vaccination and responded to the alpha (B.1.1.7), delta (B.1.617.2), and omicron (B.1.1.529 or BA.1) variants of concern. Cellular responses to seasonal coronaviruses increased after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Heterologous prime boosting with mRNA vaccines was associated with the highest antibody (p=0·019) and CD4 T cell responses (p=0·003), and hypertension with lower antibody levels after three doses (p=0·04).

INTERPRETATION

Most older adults, including those with comorbidities, generated good serological and cellular responses after two vaccine doses. Responses further improved after three doses, particularly after heterologous boosting. Vaccination also generated cross-reactive T cells against variants of concern and seasonal coronaviruses. Frailty was not associated with impaired immune responses, but hypertension might indicate reduced responsiveness to vaccines even after three doses. Individual differences identified through longitudinal sampling enables better prediction of the variability of vaccine responses, which can help guide future policy on the need for subsequent doses and their timing.

FUNDING

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norwegian Ministry of Health, Research Council of Norway, and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.

Immune responses in Omicron SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in vaccinated adults

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has more than 15 mutations in the receptor binding domain of the Spike protein enabling increased transmissibility and viral escape from antibodies in vaccinated individuals. It is unclear how vaccine immunity protects against Omicron infection. Here we show that vaccinated participants at a super-spreader event have robust recall response of humoral and pre-existing cellular immunity induced by the vaccines, and an emergent de novo T cell response to non-Spike antigens. Individuals with Omicron SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections have significantly increased activated SARS-CoV-2 wild type Spike-specific cytotoxic T cells, activated follicular helper (T_FH) cells, functional T cell responses, boosted humoral responses, and rapid release of Spike and RBD-specific IgG⁺ B cell plasmablasts and memory B cells into circulation. Omicron breakthrough infection affords significantly increased de novo memory T cell responses to non-Spike viral antigens. Concerted T and B cell responses may provide durable and broad immunity.

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant possess many mutations within the receptor binding domain of the Spike protein, which confer increased transmissibility and higher antibody escape. Here, the authors carry out analysis of the serological and cellular immune responses of individuals with Omicron breakthrough infection.

Long-term first-in-man Phase I/II study of an adjuvant dendritic cell vaccine in patients with high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

Patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PC) can experience biochemical relapse (BCR), despite surgery, and develop noncurative disease. The present study aimed to reduce the risk of BCR with a personalized dendritic cell (DC) vaccine, given as adjuvant therapy, after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).

METHODS

Twelve weeks after RALP, 20 patients with high-risk PC and undetectable PSA received DC vaccinations for 3 years or until BCR. The primary endpoint was the time to BCR. The immune response was assessed 7 weeks after surgery (baseline) and at one-time point during the vaccination period.

RESULTS

Among 20 patients, 11 were BCR-free over a median of 96 months (range: 84-99). The median time from the end of vaccinations to the last follow-up was 57 months (range: 45-60). Nine patients developed BCR, either during (n = 4) or after (n = 5) the vaccination period. Among five patients diagnosed with intraductal carcinoma, three experienced early BCR during the vaccination period. All patients that developed BCR remained in stable disease within a median of 99 months (range: 74-99). The baseline immune response was significantly associated with the immune response during the vaccination period (p = 0.015). For patients diagnosed with extraprostatic extension (EPE), time to BCR was longer in vaccine responders than in non-responders (p = 0.09). Among 12 patients with the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 5 PC, five achieved remission after 84 months, and all mounted immune responses.

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed with EPE and ISUP grade 5 PC were at particularly high risk of developing postsurgical BCR. In this subgroup, the vaccine response was related to a reduced BCR incidence. The vaccine was safe, without side effects. This adjuvant first-in-man Phase I/II DC vaccine study showed promising results. DC vaccines after curative surgery should be investigated further in a larger cohort of patients with high-risk PC.

Abstract 3659: WT1 and PRAME mRNA transfected TLR 7/8-polarized fast DC vaccines in AML patients mount specific immune responses and impact progression free survival

Patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may not be eligible for curative intensive treatment due to co-morbidity factors or age.

Here we report results of 5 AML patients in morphological remission after incomplete induction/consolidation chemotherapy treated with dendritic cells (DCs) targeting WT-1 and PRAME. DCs were produced as described previously (Subklewe et al 2014), using a maturation cocktail containing the TLR 7/8 ligand R848. These DCs show a polarized release of IL-12p70 combined with low IL-10 upon stimulation. 2.5 or 5E+6 DCs per antigen were injected intradermally once weekly for 4 weeks (wks), in wk 6 and thereafter at monthly intervals. Blood and bone marrow (BM) samples were collected at regular intervals. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was measured in BM by quantitative PCR of WT-1 and PRAME expression and by morphology. Immune responses were assessed by analysis of intracellular interferon gamma expression or proliferation following stimulation with peptides spanning WT-1, PRAME, hTERT and survivin or after stimulation with autologous WT-1 and PRAME DCs.

A 57 year old woman with intermediate risk M4 AML was vaccinated over 22 months after chemotherapy. Five weeks after start of vaccination she mounted strong CD8 responses against PRAME combined with an increase in hTERT response, suggesting epitope spreading. WT-1 signals in BM showed low positive levels throughout vaccination, but she remains in morphological remission 33 months after end of chemotherapy (EoC).

A 50 year old man with M2 intermediate risk AML, initially not eligible for BM transplantation, showed specific immune responses against WT-1 during 10 months of vaccination. Due to Bell’s Palsy he was treated with cortisone which immediately reduced the vaccine effect, accompanied by increase of blasts in the bone marrow. Following new induction therapy he received BM transplantation and is currently in CR.

A 68 year old woman with M1 intermediate risk AML is under vaccination for 24 months. WT-1 signals in BM continue to be slightly elevated without any sign of morphological relapse. CD4 responses and low CD8 responses are detected against WT-1, PRAME and hTERT.

A 73 year old woman with M1 good risk AML relapsed after 6 months of DC vaccination without mounting specific immune responses. DC treatment was combined with 5-Azacytidine without any immunological and clinical effects.

A 59 year old woman with good risk AML has been vaccinated for 14 months and is in remission for 21 months since EoC. WT-1 in BM remains slightly elevated whilst the initially positive PRAME signal is negative.

Our results show that in 4 out of 5 AML patients fast TLR-polarized DC vaccination induced or supported specific T cell responses. 3 patients continue to be in CR after 21, 25 and 33 months respectively, following suboptimal primary chemotherapy. Immune responses are under investigation and will be presented.

Citation Format: Iris Bigalke, Guri Solum, Dag Josefsen, Yngvar Fløisand, Kirsti Hønnåshagen, Lisbeth Skoge, Signe Spetalen, Stein Sæbøe-Larssen, Dolores J. Schendel, Gunnar Kvalheim. WT1 and PRAME mRNA transfected TLR 7/8-polarized fast DC vaccines in AML patients mount specific immune responses and impact progression free survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3659. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3659

Gastrin activates autophagy and increases migration and survival of gastric adenocarcinoma cells

BACKGROUND

The peptide hormone gastrin exerts a growth-promoting effect in both normal and malignant gastrointestinal tissue. Gastrin mediates its effect via the cholecystokinin 2 receptor (CCKBR/CCK2R). Although a substantial part of the gastric adenocarcinomas express gastrin and CCKBR, the role of gastrin in tumor development is not completely understood. Autophagy has been implicated in mechanisms governing cytoprotection, tumor growth, and contributes to chemoresistance. This study explores the role of autophagy in response to gastrin in gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines.

METHODS

Immunoblotting, survival assays and the xCELLigence system were used to study gastrin induced autophagy. Chemical inhibitors of autophagy were utilized to assess the role of this process in the regulation of cellular responses induced by gastrin. Further, knockdown studies using siRNA and immunoblotting were performed to explore the signaling pathways that activate autophagy in response to gastrin treatment.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that gastrin increases the expression of the autophagy markers MAP1LC3B-II and SQSTM1 in gastric adenocarcinoma cells. Gastrin induces autophagy via activation of the STK11-PRKAA2-ULK1 and that this signaling pathway is involved in increased migration and cell survival. Furthermore, gastrin mediated increase in survival of cells treated with cisplatin is partially dependent on induced autophagy.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals a novel role of gastrin in the regulation of autophagy. It also opens up new avenues in the treatment of gastric cancer by targeting CCKBR mediated signaling and/or autophagy in combination with conventional cytostatic drugs.