1
|
Saba L, Cau R, Murgia A, Nicolaides AN, Wintermark M, Castillo M, Staub D, Kakkos SK, Yang Q, Paraskevas KI, Yuan C, Edjlali M, Sanfilippo R, Hendrikse J, Johansson E, Mossa-Basha M, Balu N, Dichgans M, Saloner D, Bos D, Jager HR, Naylor R, Faa G, Suri JS, Costello J, Auer DP, Mcnally JS, Bonati LH, Nardi V, van der Lugt A, Griffin M, Wasserman BA, Kooi ME, Gillard J, Lanzino G, Mikhailidis DP, Mandell DM, Benson JC, van Dam-Nolen DHK, Kopczak A, Song JW, Gupta A, DeMarco JK, Chaturvedi S, Virmani R, Hatsukami TS, Brown M, Moody AR, Libby P, Schindler A, Saam T. Carotid Plaque-RADS: A Novel Stroke Risk Classification System. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2024; 17:62-75. [PMID: 37823860 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carotid artery atherosclerosis is highly prevalent in the general population and is a well-established risk factor for acute ischemic stroke. Although the morphological characteristics of vulnerable plaques are well recognized, there is a lack of consensus in reporting and interpreting carotid plaque features. OBJECTIVES The aim of this paper is to establish a consistent and comprehensive approach for imaging and reporting carotid plaque by introducing the Plaque-RADS (Reporting and Data System) score. METHODS A panel of experts recognized the necessity to develop a classification system for carotid plaque and its defining characteristics. Using a multimodality analysis approach, the Plaque-RADS categories were established through consensus, drawing on existing published reports. RESULTS The authors present a universal classification that is applicable to both researchers and clinicians. The Plaque-RADS score offers a morphological assessment in addition to the prevailing quantitative parameter of "stenosis." The Plaque-RADS score spans from grade 1 (indicating complete absence of plaque) to grade 4 (representing complicated plaque). Accompanying visual examples are included to facilitate a clear understanding of the Plaque-RADS categories. CONCLUSIONS Plaque-RADS is a standardized and reliable system of reporting carotid plaque composition and morphology via different imaging modalities, such as ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. This scoring system has the potential to help in the precise identification of patients who may benefit from exclusive medical intervention and those who require alternative treatments, thereby enhancing patient care. A standardized lexicon and structured reporting promise to enhance communication between radiologists, referring clinicians, and scientists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Cau
- Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Andrew N Nicolaides
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus; University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Vascular Surgery, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Max Wintermark
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mauricio Castillo
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel Staub
- Vascular Medicine/Angiology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stavros K Kakkos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Qi Yang
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Chun Yuan
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Myriam Edjlali
- Multimodal Biomedical Imaging Laboratory (BioMaps), Paris-Saclay University, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Frédéric Joliot Hospital Department, Orsay, France; Department of Radiology, APHP, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Elias Johansson
- Clinical Science, Umeå University, Neurosciences, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Mahmud Mossa-Basha
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Niranjan Balu
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Martin Dichgans
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - David Saloner
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Daniel Bos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - H Rolf Jager
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology and the Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ross Naylor
- The Leicester Vascular Institute, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Gavino Faa
- Department of Pathology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Jasjit S Suri
- Stroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoin, Roseville, California, USA
| | - Justin Costello
- Department of Neuroradiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Dorothee P Auer
- Radiological Sciences, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, and NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - J Scott Mcnally
- Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Leo H Bonati
- Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Valentina Nardi
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Aad van der Lugt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maura Griffin
- Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Bruce A Wasserman
- Department of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - M Eline Kooi
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Giuseppe Lanzino
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Dimitri P Mikhailidis
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London School, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel M Mandell
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John C Benson
- Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Dianne H K van Dam-Nolen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anna Kopczak
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jae W Song
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ajay Gupta
- Department of Radiology Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - J Kevin DeMarco
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Seemant Chaturvedi
- Department of Neurology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Renu Virmani
- Department of Cardiovascular Pathology, CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Martin Brown
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alan R Moody
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Libby
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andreas Schindler
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Saam
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Die Radiologie, Rosenheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mossa-Basha M, Yuan C, Wasserman BA, Mikulis DJ, Hatsukami TS, Balu N, Gupta A, Zhu C, Saba L, Li D, DeMarco JK, Lehman VT, Qiao Y, Jager HR, Wintermark M, Brinjikji W, Hess CP, Saloner DA. Survey of the American Society of Neuroradiology Membership on the Use and Value of Extracranial Carotid Vessel Wall MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:1756-1761. [PMID: 36423951 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Extracranial vessel wall MRI (EC-VWI) contributes to vasculopathy characterization. This survey study investigated EC-VWI adoption by American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) members and indications and barriers to implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS The ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group survey on EC-VWI use, frequency, applications, MR imaging systems and field strength used, protocol development approaches, vendor engagement, reasons for not using EC-VWI, ordering provider interest, and impact on clinical care was distributed to the ASNR membership between April 2, 2019, to August 30, 2019. RESULTS There were 532 responses; 79 were excluded due to minimal, incomplete response and 42 due to redundant institutional responses, leaving 411 responses. Twenty-six percent indicated that their institution performed EC-VWI, with 66.3% performing it ≤1-2 times per month, most frequently on 3T MR imaging, with most using combined 3D and 2D protocols. Protocols most commonly included pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted imaging, TOF-MRA, and contrast-enhanced MRA. Inflammatory vasculopathy (63.3%), plaque vulnerability assessments (61.1%), intraplaque hemorrhage (61.1%), and dissection-detection/characterization (51.1%) were the most frequent applications. For those not performing EC-VWI, the reasons were a lack of ordering provider interest (63.9%), lack of radiologist time/interest (47.5%) or technical support (41.4%) for protocol development, and limited interpretation experience (44.9%) and knowledge of clinical applications (43.7%). Reasons given by 46.9% were that no providers approached radiology with interest in EC-VWI. If barriers were overcome, 51.1% of those not performing EC-VWI indicated they would perform it, and 40.6% were unsure; 48.6% did not think that EC-VWI had impacted patient management at their institution. CONCLUSIONS Only 26% of neuroradiology groups performed EC-VWI, most commonly due to limited clinician interest. Improved provider and radiologist education, protocols, processing techniques, technical support, and validation trials could increase adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Mossa-Basha
- From the Department of Radiology (M.M.-B.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina .,Departments of Radiology (M.M.-B., N.B., C.Z.)
| | - C Yuan
- Department of Radiology (C.Y.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - B A Wasserman
- Department of Radiology (B.A.W.), University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Radiology (B.A.W., Y.Q.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - D J Mikulis
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging (D.J.M.), The University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - T S Hatsukami
- Surgery (T.S.H.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - N Balu
- Departments of Radiology (M.M.-B., N.B., C.Z.)
| | - A Gupta
- Department of Radiology (A.G.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - C Zhu
- Departments of Radiology (M.M.-B., N.B., C.Z.)
| | - L Saba
- Department of Radiology (L.S.), University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - D Li
- Biomedical Imaging Research Institute (D.L.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - J K DeMarco
- Department of Radiology (J.K.D.), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - V T Lehman
- Department of Radiology (V.T.L., W.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Y Qiao
- Department of Radiology (B.A.W., Y.Q.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - H R Jager
- Neuroradiological Academic Unit (H.R.J.), Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - M Wintermark
- Department of Neuroradiology (M.W.), MD Anderson Cancer Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - W Brinjikji
- Department of Radiology (V.T.L., W.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - C P Hess
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.P.H., D.A.S.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - D A Saloner
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (C.P.H., D.A.S.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lyndon D, Davagnanam I, Wilson D, Jichi F, Merwick A, Bolsover F, Jager HR, Cipolotti L, Wheeler-Kingshott C, Hughes D, Murphy E, Lachmann R, Werring DJ. MRI-visible perivascular spaces as an imaging biomarker in Fabry disease. J Neurol 2020; 268:872-878. [PMID: 33078310 PMCID: PMC7914182 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10209-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder resulting in vascular glycosphingolipid accumulation and increased stroke risk. MRI findings associated with FD include white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and cerebral microbleeds (CMBs), suggesting the presence of cerebral small vessel disease. MRI-visible perivascular spaces (PVS) are another promising marker of small vessel disease associated with impaired interstitial fluid drainage. We investigated the association of PVS severity and anatomical distribution with FD.
Patients and methods We compared patients with genetically proven FD to healthy controls. PVS, WMH, lacunes and CMBs were rated on standardised sequences using validated criteria and scales, blinded to diagnosis. A trained observer (using a validated rating scale), quantified the total severity of PVS. We used logistic regression to investigate the association of severe PVS with FD. Results We included 33 FD patients (median age 44, 44.1% male) and 20 healthy controls (median age 33.5, 50% male). Adjusting for age and sex, FD was associated with more severe basal ganglia PVS (odds ratio (OR) 5.80, 95% CI 1.03–32.7) and higher total PVS score (OR 4.03, 95% CI 1.36–11.89). Compared with controls, participants with FD had: higher WMH volume (median 495.03 mm3 vs 0, p = 0.0008), more CMBs (21.21% vs none, p = 0.04), and a higher prevalence of lacunes (21.21% vs. 5%, p = 0.23). Conclusions PVS scores are more severe in FD than control subjects. Our findings have potential relevance for FD diagnosis and suggest that impaired interstitial fluid drainage might be a mechanism of white matter injury in FD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Lyndon
- Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neurology, Russell Square House, London, UK
| | - I Davagnanam
- Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
| | - D Wilson
- Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neurology, Russell Square House, London, UK.,New Zealand Brain Research Institute, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - F Jichi
- Department of Biostatistics, University College of London, London, UK
| | - A Merwick
- Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neurology, Russell Square House, London, UK
| | - F Bolsover
- Charles Dent Metabolic Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - H R Jager
- Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - L Cipolotti
- Department of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - C Wheeler-Kingshott
- Department of Neuroinflammation Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - D Hughes
- Lysosomal Storage Disorders Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, UK
| | - E Murphy
- Charles Dent Metabolic Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - R Lachmann
- Charles Dent Metabolic Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - D J Werring
- Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neurology, Russell Square House, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|