Incursion of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86.1 variant into Israel: National-scale wastewater surveillance using a novel quantitative real-time PCR assay

The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 variant BA.2.86.1 raised a considerable concern, due to the large number of potentially virulent mutations. In this study, we developed a novel assay that specifically detects variant BA.2.86.1, and used it to screen environmental samples from wastewater treatment sites across Israel. By using a multiplex assay that included a general SARS-CoV-2 reaction, together with the BA.2.86.1-specific reaction and a control reaction, we quantified the absolute number of viral copies in each sample and its relative abundance, compared with the total copy number of circulating SARS-CoV-2. Evaluation of the new reactions showed that they are both sensitive and specific, detecting down to four copies per reaction, and maintain specificity in the presence of Omicron variants BA.1, 2 and 4 RNA. Examination of 279 samples from 30 wastewater collection sites during August-September 2023 showed that 35 samples (12.5 %) were positive, from 18 sites. Quantitative analysis of the samples showed that the relative abundance of variant BA.2.86.1 with respect to the total viral load of SARS-CoV-2 was very low and consisted between 0.01 % and 0.6 % of the total SARS-CoV-2 circulation. This study demonstrates the importance of combining wastewater surveillance with the development of specialized diagnostic assays, when clinical testing is insufficient. This approach may be useful for timely response by public health authorities in future outbreaks.

A Multi-Laboratory Evaluation of Commercial Monkeypox Virus Molecular Tests

In this report, we describe the first national scale multi-laboratory evaluation of monkeypox virus (MPXV) DNA commercial PCR kits. The objective of this study was to evaluate 2 kits by different diagnostic laboratories across Israel. Ten standardized samples were tested simultaneously using the Novaplex (15 laboratories) and Bio-Speedy (seven laboratories) kits. An in-house assay based on previously published reactions was used as reference. Comparison of the results showed high intra-assay agreement between laboratories, with small variations for most samples. The in-house assay had an analytical detection limit of less than 10 copies per reaction. While the 2 commercial kits were able to detect specimens with low viral loads similarly to the in-house assay, significant differences were observed, in the Cq values and relative fluorescence (RF), between the assays. The RF signal of the in-house and Bio-Speedy assays ranged between 5,000 and 10,000 RFU, while the signal in the Novaplex assay was less than 600 RFU. Due to the kit measurement protocol, the Cq values of the Bio-Speedy kit were 5 to 7.5 cycles lower than those of the in-house assay. On the contrary, the Cq values of the Novaplex kit were significantly higher than those of the in-house assay, with differences of 3 to 5 cycles per sample. Our results suggest that while all assays were similar in their overall sensitivity, direct comparison of Cq values between them may be misleading. To our knowledge, this is the first methodical evaluation of commercial MPX test kits. We therefore anticipate that this study would help diagnostic laboratories in choosing a specific MPX detection assay. IMPORTANCE To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first methodical evaluation of commercial kits designed for Monkeypox virus detection. This was done by performing the same tests using the same sample set in multiple laboratories, simultaneously, on a national scale. It therefore provides important and unique information on the performance of such kits and provides a guideline for choosing the assay of choice for monkeypox virus diagnosis in a standard diagnostic laboratory. It also demonstrates potential complications when trying to compare the results of different assays, even when testing exactly the same samples, under identical conditions.