Successful Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Meningitis with Sulbactam-Durlobactam

BACKGROUND

The treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii/calcoaceticus complex (CRAB) presents significant treatment challenges.

METHODS

We report the case of a 42-year-old woman with CRAB meningitis who experienced persistently positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures for 13 days despite treatment with high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam and cefiderocol. On day 13, she was transitioned to sulbactam-durlobactam and meropenem; four subsequent CSF cultures remained negative. After 14 days of sulbactam-durlobactam, she was cured of infection. Whole genome sequencing investigations identified putative mechanisms that contributed to reduced cefiderocol susceptibility observed during cefiderocol therapy. Blood and CSF samples were collected pre-dose and 3-hours post initiation of a sulbactam-durlobactam infusion.

RESULTS

The CRAB isolate belonged to sequence type 2. An acquired blaOXA-23 and an intrinsic blaOXA-51-like (i.e., blaOXA-66) carbapenemase gene were identified. The paradoxical effect (i.e., no growth at lower cefiderocol dilutions but growth at higher dilutions) was observed by broth microdilution after 8 days of cefiderocol exposure but not by disk diffusion. Potential markers of resistance to cefiderocol included mutations in the start codon of piuA and piuC iron transport genes and a A515V substitution in PBP3, the primary target of cefiderocol. Sulbactam and durlobactam were detected in CSF at both timepoints, indicating CSF penetration.

CONCLUSIONS

This case describes successful treatment of refractory CRAB meningitis with the administration of sulbactam-durlobactam and meropenem and highlights the need to be cognizant of the paradoxical effect that can be observed with broth microdilution testing of CRAB isolates with cefiderocol.

Double-Blind, Randomized Comparison of the Analgesic and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Controlled- and Immediate-Release Oral Oxycodone in Cancer Pain Patients

Thirty patients with cancer pain completed a double-blind crossover study comparing controlled-release (CR) and immediate-release (IR) oxycodone. In open-label titration (2 to 21 days), these patients were stabilized on IR oxycodone qid. They were then randomized to double-blind treatment with CR oxycodone q12h or IR oxycodone qid for 3 to 7 days followed by crossover at the same daily dose. Mean (+/- SD) pain intensity (0 = none to 10 = severe) decreased from a baseline of 6.0 +/- 2.2 to 2.7 +/- 1.1 after titration with IR oxycodone dosed qid. Pain intensity remained stable throughout double-blind treatment: 2.7 +/- 1.9 with CR oxycodone and 2.8 +/- 1.9 with IR oxycodone. Acceptability of therapy and pain scores correlated with plasma oxycodone concentrations for each interval and were similar for both medications (IR and CR oxycodone). Adverse events were similar for both formulations. Following repeat dosing under double-blind conditions, oral CR oxycodone administered q12h provided analgesia comparable to IR oxycodone given qid.