1
|
Alimsijah PI, Ang CY, Han HS. Old World Screwworm myiasis: First report of auricular Chrysomya bezziana myiasis in a dog in Singapore. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports 2024; 48:100991. [PMID: 38316506 DOI: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2024.100991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
A German Shepherd dog was presented to a referral practice for screwworm myiasis affecting the ear. The successful management involved killing the larvae with afoxolaner plus milbemycin oxime and using video otoscopy to completely remove dead larvae. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of auricular myiasis by Chrysomya bezziana in a dog in Singapore and the first report of video otoscopic management of myiasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P I Alimsijah
- Mount Pleasant Animal Clinic East, 152 East Coast Road, Singapore 428855.
| | - C Y Ang
- Veterinary Emergency and Specialty Hospital, 232 Whitley Road, Singapore 297824
| | - H S Han
- Veterinary Emergency and Specialty Hospital, 232 Whitley Road, Singapore 297824
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jeong S, Yu H, Park SH, Woo D, Lee SJ, Chong GO, Han HS, Kim JC. Comparing deep learning and handcrafted radiomics to predict chemoradiotherapy response for locally advanced cervical cancer using pretreatment MRI. Sci Rep 2024; 14:1180. [PMID: 38216687 PMCID: PMC10786874 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51742-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), but its responsiveness varies among patients. A reliable tool for predicting CRT responses is necessary for personalized cancer treatment. In this study, we constructed prediction models using handcrafted radiomics (HCR) and deep learning radiomics (DLR) based on pretreatment MRI data to predict CRT response in LACC. Furthermore, we investigated the potential improvement in prediction performance by incorporating clinical factors. A total of 252 LACC patients undergoing curative chemoradiotherapy are included. The patients are randomly divided into two independent groups for the training (167 patients) and test datasets (85 patients). Contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR scans are obtained. For HCR analysis, 1890 imaging features are extracted and a support vector machine classifier with a five-fold cross-validation is trained on training dataset to predict CRT response and subsequently validated on test dataset. For DLR analysis, a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network was trained on training dataset and validated on test dataset. In conclusion, both HCR and DLR models could predict CRT responses in patients with LACC. The integration of clinical factors into radiomics prediction models tended to improve performance in HCR analysis. Our findings may contribute to the development of personalized treatment strategies for LACC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungmoon Jeong
- Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hosang Yu
- Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Shin-Hyung Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Dongwon Woo
- Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Seoung-Jun Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Chul Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hussain G, Akram R, Anwar H, Sajid F, Iman T, Han HS, Raza C, De Aguilar JLG. Adult neurogenesis: a real hope or a delusion? Neural Regen Res 2024; 19:6-15. [PMID: 37488837 PMCID: PMC10479850 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.375317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Adult neurogenesis, the process of creating new neurons, involves the coordinated division, migration, and differentiation of neural stem cells. This process is restricted to neurogenic niches located in two distinct areas of the brain: the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus and the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricle, where new neurons are generated and then migrate to the olfactory bulb. Neurogenesis has been thought to occur only during the embryonic and early postnatal stages and to decline with age due to a continuous depletion of neural stem cells. Interestingly, recent years have seen tremendous progress in our understanding of adult brain neurogenesis, bridging the knowledge gap between embryonic and adult neurogenesis. Here, we discuss the current status of adult brain neurogenesis in light of what we know about neural stem cells. In this notion, we talk about the importance of intracellular signaling molecules in mobilizing endogenous neural stem cell proliferation. Based on the current understanding, we can declare that these molecules play a role in targeting neurogenesis in the mature brain. However, to achieve this goal, we need to avoid the undesired proliferation of neural stem cells by controlling the necessary checkpoints, which can lead to tumorigenesis and prove to be a curse instead of a blessing or hope.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghulam Hussain
- Neurochemicalbiology and Genetics Laboratory (NGL), Department of Physiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Rabia Akram
- Neurochemicalbiology and Genetics Laboratory (NGL), Department of Physiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Haseeb Anwar
- Neurochemicalbiology and Genetics Laboratory (NGL), Department of Physiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Faiqa Sajid
- Neurochemicalbiology and Genetics Laboratory (NGL), Department of Physiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Tehreem Iman
- Neurochemicalbiology and Genetics Laboratory (NGL), Department of Physiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Chand Raza
- Department of Zoology, Faculty of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Jose-Luis Gonzalez De Aguilar
- INSERM, U1118, Mécanismes Centraux et Péripheriques de la Neurodégénérescence, Strasbourg, France, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim J, LE TM, Lee D, Nguyen HDT, Cho HJ, Sohn SK, Kim JG, Jeong SY, Ham JY, Jeong JY, Han HS, Moon JH, Baek DW. Circulating-tumor DNA Assessment in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma to Determine Up-front Stem Cell Transplantation: A Pilot Study. In Vivo 2024; 38:372-379. [PMID: 38148060 PMCID: PMC10756469 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM This study evaluated the possibility of clinical use of circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker to determine up-front autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) for patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS To explore the dynamics of ctDNA in DLBCL, blood samples were collected sequentially before and after treatment from patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy. To conduct ctDNA genotyping and ctDNA monitoring simultaneously, targeted sequencing by cancer personalized profiling using deep sequencing was used. RESULTS Ten patients between the ages of 50 and 60 years were enrolled. Based on the international prognostic index (IPI), seven patients were classified as high-IPI-risk group, and three patients were classified as low-IPI-risk group. The IPI risk group correlated with total metabolic tumor volume. All patients completed six cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy, and seven patients achieved complete response. Changes in ctDNA mutation numbers did not correlate with changes in PET scan images and treatment response. In most high-risk patients, new mutations appeared in ctDNA after completion of chemotherapy that conceivably marked resistant clones. Notably, disease relapse did not occur in high-risk patients with poor prognostic mutations who underwent autologous SCT. CONCLUSION ctDNA monitoring was meaningful in high-risk patients. Moreover, ctDNA and well-known prognostic factors should be considered in the decision making for auto-SCT. If a new genetic mutation in ctDNA with a negative prognosis would emerge during treatment, high-risk patients should consider auto-SCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juhyung Kim
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Tan Minh LE
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Donghyeon Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hong Duc Thi Nguyen
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Jeong Cho
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Kyun Sohn
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Gwang Kim
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Shin-Young Jeong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Ham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Yun Jeong
- Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon Ho Moon
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea;
| | - Dong Won Baek
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Le TM, Choi Y, Nguyen HDT, Lee D, Lee OE, Chong GO, Seong WJ, Cha HH, Han HS. Relationship between maternal Group B Streptococcal colonization and gestational vaginal microbiome composition: A pilot study. Indian J Med Microbiol 2023; 46:100426. [PMID: 37945119 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2023.100426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization and vaginal microbiome (VMB) dysbiosis are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. However, the role of GBS colonization in maternal VMB remains unclear. Herein, we aimed to investigate this relationship and identify additional pathogens associated with GBS colonization for potential implications in understanding their clinical significance. MATERIALS AND METHODS Vaginal swab samples were obtained before delivery from nine women with normal pregnancies for GBS detection and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The diversity analysis and community state types clustering were used to compare the GBS-positive vs. GBS-negative groups. ANCOM-BC was implemented to identify differentially abundant microbes (DAMs) associated with GBS colonization. The correlation and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between DMAs and clinical parameters. RESULTS There were 6/9 (66,7%) GBS-negative pregnant women. The α-diversity index (p = 0.71 for observed operational taxonomic units and p = 0.90 for Shannon diversity), β-diversity index (p = 0.583), and community state types clustering (p = 0.23) were not significantly different between the GBS-positive and -negative groups. Four DAMs, namely, Actinomyces, Shigella, Fenollaria, and Gemella, were significantly associated with GBS colonization, reflecting the dynamicity of the gestational VMB. Their abundances were negatively correlated with birth weight and had acceptable discriminating ability in premature membrane rupture (area under the curve, 0.9). CONCLUSIONS Despite the absence of significant effects on overall VMB composition, our preliminary results investigated that maternal GBS colonization related to high abundance of four pathogens with potential clinical utility as microbial signatures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tan Minh Le
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea; BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea.
| | - Yeseul Choi
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea; BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea.
| | - Hong Duc Thi Nguyen
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea; BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea.
| | - Donghyeon Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea; BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea.
| | - Olive Em Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea; BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea.
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, South Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, South Korea.
| | - Won Joon Seong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, South Korea.
| | - Hyun-Hwa Cha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, South Korea.
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea; BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea; Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, South Korea; Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Park SH, Jeong S, Yu H, Woo D, Chong GO, Han HS, Kim J. Deep Learning vs. Handcrafted Radiomics to Predict Chemoradiotherapy Response for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e480. [PMID: 37785521 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To predict CRT response in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) with handcrafted radiomics (HCR) and deep learning radiomics (DLR) using pretreatment MRI. Furthermore, we investigate whether the incorporation of clinical factors improves prediction performance. MATERIALS/METHODS Two hundred and fifty-two patients with LACC are enrolled. All patients are treated with external beam radiotherapy, followed by high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy with concurrent cisplatin. The patients are randomly divided into two independent groups for the training (167 patients) and test datasets (85 patients). Contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR scans are obtained. Patients in the training and test sets have similar characteristics in terms of age, tumor size, FIGO stage, HPV infection status, or CRT response. For HCR analysis, 1890 imaging features are extracted and a support vector machine classifier with a five-fold cross-validation is trained using training dataset to predict CRT response and validated using test dataset. For DLR analysis, a 3-dimensional convolutional neural network was trained and validated using test dataset. RESULTS A comparison of the DLR and HCR models reveals that the DLR model exhibits better prediction performance than the HCR model for the test dataset (AUC = 0.721 vs. 0.597, p = 0.097). The incorporation of clinical factors could improve performance in both DLR and HCR models. CONCLUSION The DLR models outperform the HCR models in predicting CRT responses in patients with LACC. Combining clinical factors and MRI may improve the prediction performance in both HCR and DLR analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S H Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) Korea
| | - S Jeong
- Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) Korea; Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) Korea
| | - H Yu
- Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) Korea
| | - D Woo
- Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) Korea
| | - G O Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) Korea; Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) Korea
| | - H S Han
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) Korea; Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) Korea
| | - J Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nguyen HDT, Le TM, Lee E, Lee D, Choi Y, Cho J, Park NJY, Chong GO, Seo I, Han HS. Relationship between Human Papillomavirus Status and the Cervicovaginal Microbiome in Cervical Cancer. Microorganisms 2023; 11:1417. [PMID: 37374919 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11061417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Uterine cervical cancer (CC) is a complex, multistep disease primarily linked to persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV). However, it is widely acknowledged that HR-HPV infection alone cannot account for the formation and progression of CC. Emerging evidence suggests that the cervicovaginal microbiome (CVM) also plays a significant role in HPV-related CC. Certain bacteria, such as Fusobacterium spp., Porphyromonas, Prevotella, and Campylobacter, are currently being considered as potential microbiomarkers for HPV-positive CC. However, the composition of the CVM in CC is inconsistent; thus, further studies are needed. This review comprehensively discusses the complex interplay between HPV and the CVM in cervical carcinogenesis. It is postulated that the dynamic interaction between HPV and the CVM creates an imbalanced cervicovaginal microenvironment that triggers dysbiosis, enhances HPV persistence, and promotes cervical carcinogenesis. Moreover, this review aims to provide updated evidence on the potential role of bacteriotherapy, particularly probiotics, in the treatment of CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Duc Thi Nguyen
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
| | - Tan Minh Le
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunmi Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
| | - Donghyeon Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeseul Choi
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
| | - Junghwan Cho
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Republic of Korea
| | - Nora Jee-Young Park
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Republic of Korea
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Republic of Korea
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Republic of Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Republic of Korea
| | - Incheol Seo
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Republic of Korea
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Le TM, Chong GO, Han HS. Tumor human papillomavirus: a potential test for cervical cancer prognosis. Transl Cancer Res 2023; 12:684-687. [PMID: 37033360 PMCID: PMC10080315 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-2790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tan Minh Le
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Choi Y, Park NJY, Le TM, Lee E, Lee D, Nguyen HDT, Cho J, Park JY, Han HS, Chong GO. Immune Pathway and Gene Database (IMPAGT) Revealed the Immune Dysregulation Dynamics and Overactivation of the PI3K/Akt Pathway in Tumor Buddings of Cervical Cancer. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2022; 44:5139-5152. [PMID: 36354662 PMCID: PMC9688570 DOI: 10.3390/cimb44110350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor budding (TB) is a small cluster of malignant cells at the invasive front of a tumor. Despite being an adverse prognosis marker, little research has been conducted on the tumor immune microenvironment of tumor buddings, especially in cervical cancer. Therefore, RNA sequencing was performed using 21 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slides of cervical tissues, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed. Immune Pathway and Gene Database (IMPAGT) was generated for immune profiling. "Pathway in Cancer" was identified as the most enriched pathway for both up- and downregulated DEGs. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Mapper and Gene Ontology further revealed the activation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. An IMPAGT analysis revealed immune dysregulation even at the tumor budding stage, especially in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis, with a high efficiency and integrity. These findings emphasized the clinical significance of tumor buddings and the necessity of blocking the overactivation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway to improve targeted therapy in cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeseul Choi
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Nora Jee-Young Park
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
| | - Tan Minh Le
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Eunmi Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Donghyeon Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Hong Duc Thi Nguyen
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Junghwan Cho
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
| | - Ji-Young Park
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Le TM, Nguyen HDT, Lee E, Lee D, Choi YS, Cho J, Park NJY, Han HS, Chong GO. Transcriptomic Immune Profiles Can Represent the Tumor Immune Microenvironment Related to the Tumor Budding Histology in Uterine Cervical Cancer. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:1405. [PMID: 36011316 PMCID: PMC9407871 DOI: 10.3390/genes13081405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor budding (TB) histology has become a critical biomarker for several solid cancers. Despite the accumulating evidence for the association of TB histology with poor prognosis, the biological characteristics of TB are little known about in the context related to the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in uterine cervical cancer (CC). Therefore, this study aimed to identify the transcriptomic immune profiles related to TB status and further provide robust medical evidence for clinical application. In our study, total RNA was extracted and sequenced from 21 CC tissue specimens. As such, 1494 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the high- and low-TB groups were identified by DESeq2. After intersecting the list of DEGs and public immune genes, we selected 106 immune-related DEGs. Then, hub genes were obtained using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression. Finally, the correlation between the hub genes and immune cell types was analyzed and four candidate genes were identified (one upregulated (FCGR3B) and three downregulated (ROBO2, OPRL1, and NR4A2) genes). These gene expression levels were highly accurate in predicting TB status (area under the curve >80%). Interestingly, FCGR3B is a hub gene of several innate immune pathways; its expression significantly differed in the overall survival analysis (p = 0.0016). In conclusion, FCGR3B, ROBO2, OPRL1, and NR4A2 expression can strongly interfere with TB growth and replace TB to stratify CC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tan Minh Le
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Hong Duc Thi Nguyen
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Eunmi Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Donghyeon Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Ye Seul Choi
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Junghwan Cho
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
| | - Nora Jee-Young Park
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University, Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University, Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hong JY, Han HS, Youn JH, Kim HW, Ryu HS, Park KY. Irradiation with 590-nm yellow light-emitting diode light attenuates oxidative stress and modulates UVB induced change of dermal fibroblasts. Exp Dermatol 2022; 31:931-935. [PMID: 35181944 DOI: 10.1111/exd.14542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Recently, light-emitting diode (LED)-based devices have emerged as effective and safe tools for the treatment of photoaged skin. However, few studies have been conducted to elucidate the underlying mechanism behind the effect on photoaging of LED light. In this study, we induced photoaging of human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) with Ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiation and evaluated the ability of 590 nm LED radiation to induce recovery from oxidative stress, restore collagen formation, and regulate inflammatory changes. Photoaging was induced in cultured human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) using UVB irradiaton of 50 mJ/cm2 . Then, the photoaged HDFs were irradiated with LED using a custom-built 590 nm LED device which emits light with an intensity of 38 mW/cm2 (irradiated for 900 s with 34.2 J/cm2 of total energy). LED irradiation significantly attenuated UVB-induced reactive oxygen species generation and UVB-induced phosphorylation of JNK, c-Fos, and c-Jun. In addition, the procollagen levels were recovered significantly, and MMP-9 levels were significantly suppressed after LED irradiation. The UVB-induced phosphorylation levels of NF-κB and pro-inflammatory enzyme COX-2 also significantly decreased. Our results suggest that 590-nm yellow light irradiation may be an effective and safe anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory treatment modality for photoaged skin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Y Hong
- Department of Dermatology, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Korea
| | - H S Han
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - H W Kim
- CG Bio Co. Ltd, Seoul, Korea
| | - H S Ryu
- CG Bio Co. Ltd, Seoul, Korea
| | - K Y Park
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bae MJ, Lee YM, Choi YS, Lee E, Le MT, Duc Nguyen TH, Lee D, Cho J, Han HS, Park NJY, Chong GO. Simple Electric Device to Isolate Nucleic Acids from Whole Blood Optimized for Point of Care Testing of Brain Damage. Curr Neurovasc Res 2022; 19:333-343. [PMID: 36056832 PMCID: PMC10009893 DOI: 10.2174/1567202619666220903105805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection or monitoring of brain damage is a clinically crucial issue. Nucleic acids in the whole blood can be used as biomarkers for brain injury. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) which is one of the most commonly used molecular diagnostic assays requires isolated nucleic acids to initiate amplification. Currently used nucleic acid isolation procedures are complicated and require laboratory equipments. OBJECTIVE In this study, we tried to develop a simple and convenient method to isolate nucleic acids from the whole blood sample using a tiny battery-powered electric device. The quality of the isolated nucleic acids should be suitable for PCR assay without extra preparation. METHODS A plastic device with separation chamber was designed and printed with a 3D printer. Two platinum electrodes were placed on both sides and a battery was used to supply the electricity. To choose the optimal nucleic acid isolation condition, diverse lysis buffers and separation buffers were evaluated, and the duration and voltage of the electricity were tested. Western blot analysis and PCR assay were used to determine the quality of the separated nucleic acids. RESULTS 2ul of whole blood was applied to the cathode side of the separation chamber containing 78 ul of normal saline. When the electricity at 5 V was applied for 5 min, nucleic acids were separated from segment 1 to 3 of the separation chamber. The concentration of nucleic acids peaked around 7~8 mm from cathode side. PCR assay using the separation buffer as the template was performed successfully both in conventional and realtime PCR methods. The hemoglobin in the whole blood did not show the inhibitory effect in our separation system and it may be due to structural modification of hemoglobin during electric separation. CONCLUSION Our simple electric device can separate nucleic acids from the whole blood sample by applying electricity at 5 V for 5 min. The separation buffer solution taken from the device can be used for PCR assay successfully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Jung Bae
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.,Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
| | - Young Mi Lee
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.,Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
| | - Ye Seul Choi
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.,BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Eunmi Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.,BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Minh Tan Le
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.,BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Thi Hong Duc Nguyen
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.,BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Donghyeon Lee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.,BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Junghwan Cho
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.,Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea.,Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea.,BK21 Four Program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| | - Nora Jee-Young Park
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea.,Department of Pathology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee YM, Bae MJ, Choi YS, Lee E, Cho J, Kim MG, Le MT, Nguyen THD, Han HS, Park NJY, Chong GO. Point of care test technology suitable for early detection and monitoring of ischemic stroke. Curr Neurovasc Res 2021; 18:409-414. [PMID: 34751116 PMCID: PMC9175083 DOI: 10.2174/1567202618666211109103720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability in adulthood worldwide. A simple and convenient diagnostic method is needed for monitoring high-risk patients for stroke. Few POCTs are available for stroke diagnosis. Soluble blood P-selectin is known as a biomarker for platelet aggregation. Increased expression of P-selectin is observed in coronary artery disease, acute myocardial infarction, stroke and peripheral arterial disease. Objective A simple method that can measure the increased expression of P-selectin in stroke patients is intended to be used for diagnosis or early detection and hospital monitoring of ischemic stroke. Methods Plasma proteins in blood were separated using a three-layered filter system. Quantum dot and antibody were conjugated to detect biomarkers present in plasma and then measured with a fluorescence spectrophotometer. Results The detection limit of soluble P-selectin confirmed by immunoassay was 1 ng/ul. In order to increase the sensitivity and simplify the reaction, the detection limit was measured to evaluate the sensitivity of the quantum dot labeled anti P-selectin antibody. As a result, P-selectin of 5 ng/ul or more showed saturation signal intensity, indicating the upper limit of detection, and 10 pg/ul was the lower limit of detection. Conclusion In this study, we proposed a three-layer filter membrane system that can separate biomarker-rich fractions from whole blood, simplifying the analysis process and improving sensitivity by using quantum dot-labeled antibodies to detect biomarkers. We hope that our system complements the advantages of POCT and can be applied to real clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Mi Lee
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405. Korea
| | - Mi Jung Bae
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405. Korea
| | - Ye Seul Choi
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405. Korea
| | - Eunmi Lee
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405. Korea
| | - Junghwan Cho
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405. Korea
| | - Myung-Gwan Kim
- BK21 four program, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944. Korea
| | - Minh Tan Le
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405. Korea
| | - Thi Hong Duc Nguyen
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405. Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405. Korea
| | | | - Gun Oh Chong
- Clinical Omics Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405. Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chong GO, Park SH, Park NJY, Bae BK, Lee YH, Jeong SY, Kim JC, Park JY, Ando Y, Han HS. Predicting Tumor Budding Status in Cervical Cancer Using MRI Radiomics: Linking Imaging Biomarkers to Histologic Characteristics. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13205140. [PMID: 34680289 PMCID: PMC8534175 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our previous study demonstrated that tumor budding (TB) status was associated with inferior overall survival in cervical cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether radiomic features can predict TB status in cervical cancer patients. METHODS Seventy-four patients with cervical cancer who underwent preoperative MRI and radical hysterectomy from 2011 to 2015 at our institution were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated to the training dataset (n = 48) and test dataset (n = 26). Tumors were segmented on axial gadolinium-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted images. A total of 2074 radiomic features were extracted. Four machine learning classifiers, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and neural network (NN), were used. The trained models were validated on the test dataset. RESULTS Twenty radiomic features were selected; all were features from filtered-images and 85% were texture-related features. The area under the curve values and accuracy of the models by LR, RF, SVM and NN were 0.742 and 0.769, 0.782 and 0.731, 0.849 and 0.885, and 0.891 and 0.731, respectively, in the test dataset. CONCLUSION MRI-based radiomic features could predict TB status in patients with cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (G.O.C.); (Y.H.L.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41944, Korea
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (N.J.-Y.P.); (H.S.H.)
| | - Shin-Hyung Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (B.K.B.); (J.-C.K.)
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea;
- Correspondence:
| | - Nora Jee-Young Park
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (N.J.-Y.P.); (H.S.H.)
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea;
| | - Bong Kyung Bae
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (B.K.B.); (J.-C.K.)
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (G.O.C.); (Y.H.L.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41944, Korea
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (N.J.-Y.P.); (H.S.H.)
| | - Shin Young Jeong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea;
| | - Jae-Chul Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (B.K.B.); (J.-C.K.)
| | - Ji Young Park
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea;
| | - Yu Ando
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea;
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea; (N.J.-Y.P.); (H.S.H.)
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chong GO, Jee-Young Park N, Han HS, Cho J, Kim MG, Choi Y, Yeo JY, Lee YH, Hong DG, Park JY. Intratumoral budding: A novel prognostic biomarker for tumor recurrence and a potential predictor of nodal metastasis in uterine cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:3182-3187. [PMID: 34284905 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic and predictive significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and lymph node metastasis of intratumoral budding (ITB) and its correlation with clinicopathological parameters in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS Total 151 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy were included. We assessed the status of ITB and peritumoral budding (PTB) in all available hematoxylin and eosin-stained specimens. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for ITB, PTB, and other clincopathological parameters as predictors of recurrence. RESULTS ITBhigh (≥3TB/HPF) was significantly associated with large tumor size, deep stromal invasion, LVI, parametrial invasion, and lymph node metastasis. The numbers of ITBs and PTBs were positively correlated (r2 = 0.754, p < 0.0001). ITBhigh was more frequently observed in squamous cell carcinoma compared with adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.010). ITBhigh was found to be an independent prognostic factor for tumor recurrence by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-9.90; p = 0.026). Multiple logistic regression showed association of LVI (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.11-3.06; p = 0.017) and lymph node metastasis (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.26-4.66; p = 0.019). CONCLUSION ITBhigh is an independent prognostic factor for tumor recurrence. ITB is a surrogate marker for predicting LVI in cervical cancers. The evaluation of ITB may be readily applied in the clinical setting for improved prognosis and to guide the clinical management of patients with cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Nora Jee-Young Park
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Junghwan Cho
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung-Gwan Kim
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeseul Choi
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Young Yeo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Gy Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Young Park
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Park SJ, Han HS, Shin SH, Yoo KH, Li K, Kim BJ, Seo SJ, Park KY. Adverse skin reactions due to use of face masks: a prospective survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 35:e628-e630. [PMID: 34131961 PMCID: PMC8447351 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S J Park
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - H S Han
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - S H Shin
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - K H Yoo
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - K Li
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - B J Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - S J Seo
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - K Y Park
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Han HS, Park JW, Yoo KH, Kim BJ. A phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety of HU-045 for treating moderate-to-severe glabellar lines: a pilot study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 35:e614-e617. [PMID: 34014571 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H S Han
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - J W Park
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - K H Yoo
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - B J Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yoo KH, Park SJ, Han HS, Won CH, Lee YW, Kim BJ. Randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre, phase III clinical trial with two stages to assess the safety and efficacy of letibotulinum toxin a vs. onabotulinum toxin a for subjects with moderate to severe crow's feet. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 35:1587-1594. [PMID: 33721365 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Letibotulinum toxin A (LeBA) was approved by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (known as the Korea Food & Drug Administration) for cosmetic indications in 2012. However, the efficacy and safety of this newly introduced LeBA have not been investigated in crow's feet lines (CFL) treatment and standardization before its universal use. OBJECTIVE The aim of this multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel, active-controlled Phase III clinical trial with two stages (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03408236) was to investigate the non-inferiority of LeBA vs. the existing onabotulinum toxin A (OnBA) for the treatment of CFL. METHODS A total of 240 subjects were randomized to either the test (LeBA) or control (OnBA) group. At the baseline and at weeks 4 while maximum smiling (primary efficacy assessment), 8, 12 and 16, investigator's on-site evaluation, independent evaluator, evaluation by the subjects, subjects' satisfaction assessment and safety assessment were performed. RESULTS At week 4, the response rate of primary efficacy assessment was 69.75% and 68.33% in the test (LeBA) and control (OnBA) groups, respectively, without a significant difference. Other minor secondary evaluation results showed significant differences suggesting that LeBA offered better improvement than OnBA, but the overall results did not show significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION This study showed that LeBA was as effective and safe as OnBA for the treatment of CFL at the same doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K H Yoo
- Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - S J Park
- Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - H S Han
- Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - C H Won
- Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea
| | - Y W Lee
- Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Konkuk University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - B J Kim
- Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hong JK, Han HS, Yoo KH. Inflammatory linear verrucous epidermal naevus successfully treated with a combination of triple topical agents (corticosteroid, calcipotriol and 20% urea). Clin Exp Dermatol 2021; 46:940-942. [PMID: 33577097 DOI: 10.1111/ced.14603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J K Hong
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - H S Han
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - K H Yoo
- Department of Dermatology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kang GU, Jung DR, Lee YH, Jeon SY, Han HS, Chong GO, Shin JH. Potential Association between Vaginal Microbiota and Cervical Carcinogenesis in Korean Women: A Cohort Study. Microorganisms 2021; 9:294. [PMID: 33572693 PMCID: PMC7912413 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9020294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Convincing studies demonstrated that vaginal flora is one of the most impactful key components for the well-being of the genital tract in women. Nevertheless, the potential capability of vaginal-derived bacterial communities as biomarkers to monitor cervical carcinogenesis (CC) has yet to be studied actively compared to those of bacterial vaginosis (BV). We hypothesized that vaginal microbiota might be associated with the progression of CC. In this study, we enrolled 23 participants, including healthy controls (HC group; n = 7), patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 (CIN group, n = 8), and patients with invasive cervical cancer (CAN group; n = 8). Amplicon sequencing was performed using the Ion Torrent PGM to characterize the vaginal microbiota. Patients with CIN and CAN presented vaginal microbiota dysbiosis compared with HC. The alpha diversity analysis revealed that CC has a trend to be increased in terms of diversity indexes. Moreover, CC was associated with the abundance of specific microbes, of which Lactobacillus and Gardnerella were the most significantly different between HC and CIN, whereas Streptococcus was differentially abundant in CAN compared with CIN. We then evaluated their diagnostic abilities. Testing in terms of diagnostic ability using the three genera revealed considerably high performance with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.982, 0.953, and 0.922. The current study suggests that the presence of Gardnerella and Streptococcus may be involved in the advancment of CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gi-Ung Kang
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea;
| | - Da-Ryung Jung
- Department of Biomedical Convergence Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea;
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41404, Korea; (Y.H.L.); (S.Y.J.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| | - Se Young Jeon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41404, Korea; (Y.H.L.); (S.Y.J.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea;
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41404, Korea; (Y.H.L.); (S.Y.J.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
| | - Jae-Ho Shin
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea;
- Department of Biomedical Convergence Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kang GU, Jung DR, Lee YH, Jeon SY, Han HS, Chong GO, Shin JH. Dynamics of Fecal Microbiota with and without Invasive Cervical Cancer and Its Application in Early Diagnosis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123800. [PMID: 33339445 PMCID: PMC7766064 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The fecal microbiome has been suggested to be linked to invasive cervical cancer (ICC). Considering that ICC is common in women, it is important to identify bacterial signatures from fecal microbiota that contribute in classifying cervical cancer. Although previous studies have suggested possible biomarkers based on fecal microbiota, limited information exists in terms of the diagnostic ability using gut microbiota-derived signatures for detecting early ICC. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential association between early ICC and fecal microbiota and to examine whether fecal microbiota-derived markers can be utilized as a non-invasive tool to diagnose early ICC using machine learning (ML) techniques. Further studies to incorporate quantitative and qualitative characterization of identified individual bacterial genus and validate our model in larger cohorts are imperative in terms of causality for the association between cervical cancer and microbes. Abstract The fecal microbiota is being increasingly implicated in the diagnosis of various diseases. However, evidence on changes in the fecal microbiota in invasive cervical cancer (ICC) remains scarce. Here, we aimed to investigate the fecal microbiota of our cohorts, develop a diagnostic model for predicting early ICC, and identify potential fecal microbiota-derived biomarkers using amplicon sequencing data. We obtained fecal samples from 29 healthy women (HC) and 17 women with clinically confirmed early ICC (CAN). Although Shannon’s diversity index was not reached at statistical significance, the Chao1 and Observed operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in fecal microbiota was significantly different between CAN and HC group. Furthermore, there were significant differences in the taxonomic profiles between HC and CAN; Prevotella was significantly more abundant in the CAN group and Clostridium in the HC group. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis was applied to validate the taxonomic differences at the genus level. Furthermore, we identified a set of seven bacterial genera that were used to construct a machine learning (ML)-based classifier model to distinguish CAN from patients with HC. The model had high diagnostic utility (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.913) for predicting early ICC. Our study provides an initial step toward exploring the fecal microbiota and helps clinicians diagnose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gi-Ung Kang
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
| | - Da-Ryung Jung
- Department of Biomedical Convergence Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41404, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea
| | - Se Young Jeon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41404, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea
| | - Jae-Ho Shin
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Convergence Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee YH, Kang GU, Jeon SY, Tagele SB, Pham HQ, Kim MS, Ahmad S, Jung DR, Park YJ, Han HS, Shin JH, Chong GO. Vaginal Microbiome-Based Bacterial Signatures for Predicting the Severity of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10121013. [PMID: 33256024 PMCID: PMC7761147 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10121013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Although emerging evidence revealed that the gut microbiome served as a tool and as biomarkers for predicting and detecting specific cancer or illness, it is yet unknown if vaginal microbiome-derived bacterial markers can be used as a predictive model to predict the severity of CIN. In this study, we sequenced V3 region of 16S rRNA gene on vaginal swab samples from 66 participants (24 CIN 1−, 42 CIN 2+ patients) and investigated the taxonomic composition. The vaginal microbial diversity was not significantly different between the CIN 1− and CIN 2+ groups. However, we observed Lactobacillus amylovorus dominant type (16.7%), which does not belong to conventional community state type (CST). Moreover, a minimal set of 33 bacterial species was identified to maximally differentiate CIN 2+ from CIN 1− in a random forest model, which can distinguish CIN 2+ from CIN 1− (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.952). Among the 33 bacterial species, Lactobacillus iners was selected as the most impactful predictor in our model. This finding suggests that the random forest model is able to predict the severity of CIN and vaginal microbiome may play a role as biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41404, Korea;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea;
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea;
| | - Gi-Ung Kang
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea; (G.-U.K.); (S.B.T.); (H.Q.P.); (M.-S.K.); (S.A.); (Y.-J.P.)
| | - Se Young Jeon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea;
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea;
| | - Setu Bazie Tagele
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea; (G.-U.K.); (S.B.T.); (H.Q.P.); (M.-S.K.); (S.A.); (Y.-J.P.)
| | - Huy Quang Pham
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea; (G.-U.K.); (S.B.T.); (H.Q.P.); (M.-S.K.); (S.A.); (Y.-J.P.)
| | - Min-Sueng Kim
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea; (G.-U.K.); (S.B.T.); (H.Q.P.); (M.-S.K.); (S.A.); (Y.-J.P.)
| | - Sajjad Ahmad
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea; (G.-U.K.); (S.B.T.); (H.Q.P.); (M.-S.K.); (S.A.); (Y.-J.P.)
| | - Da-Ryung Jung
- Department of Biomedical Convergence Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea;
| | - Yeong-Jun Park
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea; (G.-U.K.); (S.B.T.); (H.Q.P.); (M.-S.K.); (S.A.); (Y.-J.P.)
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea;
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41405, Korea
| | - Jae-Ho Shin
- Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea; (G.-U.K.); (S.B.T.); (H.Q.P.); (M.-S.K.); (S.A.); (Y.-J.P.)
- Department of Biomedical Convergence Science & Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea;
- Correspondence: (J.-H.S.); (G.O.C.); Tel.: +82-53-950-5716 (J.-H.S.); +82-53-200-2028 (G.O.C.); Fax: +82-53-953-7233 (J.-H.S.); +82-53-200-2684 (G.O.C.)
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41404, Korea;
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 41404, Korea;
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea;
- Correspondence: (J.-H.S.); (G.O.C.); Tel.: +82-53-950-5716 (J.-H.S.); +82-53-200-2028 (G.O.C.); Fax: +82-53-953-7233 (J.-H.S.); +82-53-200-2684 (G.O.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Park JY, Chong GO, Park JY, Chung D, Lee YH, Lee HJ, Hong DG, Han HS, Lee YS. Tumor budding in cervical cancer as a prognostic factor and its possible role as an additional intermediate-risk factor. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:157-163. [PMID: 32741542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic value and its possible role as an additional intermediate-risk factor of tumor budding (TB) in cervical cancer following radical hysterectomy. METHODS In total, 136 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy were included. We assessed the status of TB in available hematoxylin and eosin-stained specimens. Univariate and multivariate analyses for predicting tumor recurrence and death were performed using TB and other clinicopathologic parameters. To evaluate additional intermediate-risk factors of TB, patients who had at least one high-risk factor were excluded, and a total of 81 patients were included. We added TB to three conventional intermediate-risk models and compared their performance with new and conventional models using the log-rank test and receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS High TB was defined as ≥5 per high-power field for disease-free survival and ≥ 8 per high-power field for overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that high TB was an independent prognostic factor for predicting overall survival (hazard ratio, 4.96; 95% confidence intervals, 1.06-23.29; p = .0423). The addition of TB to the conventional intermediate-risk models improved the accuracy of recurrence prediction. Among the risk models, the new model using at least two risk factors, including tumor size (≥ 4 cm), deep stromal invasion (outer one-third of entire cervical thickness), lymphovascular invasion, and high TB, was the most accurate for predicting tumor recurrence (area under the curve, 0.708, hazard ratio, 4.25; p = .0231). CONCLUSION High TB may be a prognostic biomarker of cervical cancer. Moreover, the addition of TB to the conventional intermediate-risk models improves the stratification of tumor recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jee Young Park
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Gun Oh Chong
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Ji Young Park
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Doyoung Chung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Gy Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Clinical Omics Research Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Soon Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The separation of exfoliated cells from the brushes used during cervico-vaginal smears is difficult, a problem which may affect the quality of ribonucleic acid (RNA) extracted. We compared the results of RNA extraction from cervico-vaginal cytology samples according to the type of tubes, preservative solutions, and storage temperature. The samples included exfoliated cervico-vaginal cytological specimens from patients with human papilloma virus 16, positive for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer. Exfoliated cells were obtained by shaking a brush in a conventional rigid vial tube or squeezing the brush in a soft vial tube. RNA quantity and quality were compared between the two tubes. The concentration and purity of RNA (A260/A280 and A260/A230 ratios) was compared amongst five groups: Group 1, standard frozen storage; Group 2–4, RNA stabilization reagents with room temperature [RNAlater RNA Stabilization Reagent, RNAprotect cell Reagent and AllProtect Tissue Reagent]; and Group 5, Surepath Preservative fluid. To demonstrate the utility of the extracted RNA for PCR-based cDNA synthesis, GAPDH and E6 were targeted and gel band densities of GAPDH and E6 were measured. The median RNA concentration was significantly higher in the soft tubes compared with the rigid tubes (100.2 vs. 7.1 ng/μL, p = 0.0209). The purity of the RNA was higher in soft vial tubes than in rigid vials, as measured by A260/280 and A260/230 ratios. The RNA concentration, purity, and GAPDH density of groups 1, 2 and 3 were significantly higher than those of groups 4 and 5. Moreover, E6 density of group 1 and 2 was significantly higher than that of group 3, 4 and 5. The use of soft tubes enhanced the mRNA quantity and quality in cervico-vaginal cytology. The products of mRNA extraction using RNAlater RNA Stabilization Reagent and RNAprotect Cell Reagent at room temperature were comparable to those obtained by conventional frozen storage. Our protocol improved the yield and quality of RNA and might produce better results for molecular analysis in cervico-vaginal cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.,Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Seon Duk Lee
- Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.,Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yoo WS, Han HS, Kim JG, Kang K, Jeon HS, Moon JY, Park H. Development of a tablet PC-based portable device for colorimetric determination of assays including COVID-19 and other pathogenic microorganisms. RSC Adv 2020; 10:32946-32952. [PMID: 35516518 PMCID: PMC9056597 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra05866a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been a strong and urgent demand to diagnose community transmission-driven coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after it crossed borders. Tablet PC-based portable device for colorimetric determination and 3D printed sample holders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology
- Clinical Omics Institute
- School of Medicine
- Kyungpook National University
- Daegu
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kim JK, Lee YM, Lee SD, Lee DE, Choe JY, Kim YJ, Seo KS, Park J, Han HS. A simple blood preparation method for nucleic acid amplification tests using membranes. Technol Health Care 2019; 27:651-659. [PMID: 31594267 DOI: 10.3233/thc-191715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To detect most of bloodborne pathogens, serum must be separated from whole blood for efficient nucleic acid amplification. Centrifugation is the most commonly used preparation step for whole blood, but it is not easy to use a centrifuge in rural areas where electricity is not accessible. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop a simple method for obtaining serum suitable for nucleic acid amplification without the use of any instruments. METHODS Whole blood spiked with Escherichia coli (E. coli) was separated into serum and cellular fraction using 2 closely attached membranes with different characteristics. After brief heating, bacterial DNA in the serum was used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS Serum was successfully separated from cellular fraction after filtration of one membrane sheet. Membrane sheet containing serum was heated and bacterial DNA in the serum was used for PCR. The quality and concentration of DNA in the heated serum was sufficient for PCR and amplified E. coli gene products were observed. CONCLUSIONS Separation of bacteria-containing serum was feasible using two membrane sheets and the DNA isolated from serum can be used for PCR after brief heating.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Kun Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Young Mi Lee
- Departments of Physiology, Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Seon Duk Lee
- Departments of Physiology, Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Dong Eun Lee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jae Young Choe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yun Jeong Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Kang Suk Seo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jungbae Park
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Departments of Physiology, Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Silverstein J, Suleiman L, Yau C, Price ER, Singhrao R, Yee D, DeMichele A, Isaacs C, Albain KS, Chien AJ, Forero-Torres A, Wallace AM, Pusztai L, Ellis ED, Elias AD, Lang JE, Lu J, Han HS, Clark AS, Korde L, Nanda R, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Viscusi RK, Euhus DM, Edmiston KK, Chui SY, Kemmer K, Wood WC, Park JW, Liu MC, Olopade O, Leyland-Jones B, Tripathy D, Moulder SL, Rugo HS, Schwab R, Lo S, Helsten T, Beckwith H, Berry DA, Asare SM, Esserman LJ, Boughey JC, Mukhtar RA. Abstract P2-14-01: The impact of local therapy on locoregional recurrence in women with high risk breast cancer in the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 TRIAL. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p2-14-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In women with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual cancer burden (RCB) predicts distant recurrence and survival. In those with high risk tumors, locoregional recurrence (LRR) remains a concern, and has been associated with type of local therapy received. We evaluated the impact of local therapy on LRR in the ISPY-2 TRIAL.
Methods: Data were analyzed in Stata 14.2, using Chi2 test, log rank test, and a Cox proportional hazards model. RCB was considered a categorical variable (0/1 versus 2/3), as described in prior publications. Breast surgery categories were lumpectomy +/- radiotherapy, or mastectomy +/- radiotherapy. Axillary surgery was defined as sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery (≤6 nodes removed) or axillary dissection (>6 nodes).
Results: Follow up data from the I-SPY2 TRIAL were available for 630 patients (median follow up 2.76 yrs, range 0.4-7.2). Type of local therapy was significantly associated with clinical stage at presentation, with stage III patients most frequently undergoing mastectomy + radiation (p<0.001). Women with higher RCB were more likely to undergo mastectomy than those with lower RCB (61.3% vs 48.8% mastectomy rate, p=0.002), and more likely to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (62.0% vs 53.9%, p=0.048). There was no association between clinical stage, type of surgery, or radiotherapy and LRR (Table). Higher RCB was significantly associated with LRR, with 3 year locoregional recurrence free rate of 95.1% in RCB 0/1 versus 89.9% in RCB 2/3 (p=0.003).
In a Cox model adjusting for clinical stage, tumor subtype, surgical therapy, RCB status, nodal radiation, and age, significant predictors for LRR were tumor subtype and RCB status. Hazard ratio (HR) for LRR in those with RCB 0/1 was 0.39 compared to those with RCB 2/3 (95% CI 0.17-0.87, p=0.021). There was no difference in LRR between breast conservation and mastectomy; within the breast conservation group, those who had lumpectomy alone had higher hazard of LRR compared to those having lumpectomy + radiation (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-9.2, p=0.043).
Conclusions: Extent of surgical therapy was not associated with local tumor control, regardless of advanced tumor stage at presentation. Rather, tumor biology and response to therapy were the best predictors of LRR. These data highlight the opportunity to minimize the morbidity of extensive surgical therapy for patients with excellent response to systemic therapy.
LRR rates by clinical features and treatment status FrequencyLRR RateP valueClinical Stage 0.5I240 (47.5%)5.8% II185 (36.6%)8.7% III80 (15.8%)6.3% Tumor Subtype 0.014ER+PR+Her2-161 (26.4%)3.1% ER+PR-Her2-56 (9.2%)3.6% Her2+176 (28.9%)6.3% Triple negative216 (35.5%)11.1% Local therapy 0.169Lumpectomy85 (13.5%)11.8% Lumpectomy with radiation198 (31.4%)5.6% Mastectomy173 (27.5%)5.2% Mastectomy with radiation174 (27.6%)8.6% Axillary surgery 0.23None5 (0.8%)20% SLN329 (52.2%)5.8% ALND296 (47%)8.5% Axillary radiation 0.535Yes42 (6.7%)9.5% No588 (93.3%)7.0% Axillary management 0.2No surgery or radiation5 (0.8%)20.0% SLN312 (50%)5.3% SLN+Axillary radiation17 (2.7%)8.3% ALND271 (43%)10.3% ALND+Axillary radiation25 (4%)5.4% RCB 0.0020/1293 (50.1%)3.8% 2/3292 (49.9%)10.3%
Citation Format: Silverstein J, Suleiman L, Yau C, Price ER, Singhrao R, Yee D, DeMichele A, Isaacs C, Albain KS, Chien AJ, Forero-Torres A, Wallace AM, Pusztai L, Ellis ED, Elias AD, Lang JE, Lu J, Han HS, Clark AS, Korde L, Nanda R, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Viscusi RK, Euhus DM, Edmiston KK, Chui SY, Kemmer K, Wood WC, Park JW, Liu MC, Olopade O, Leyland-Jones B, Tripathy D, Moulder SL, Rugo HS, Schwab R, Lo S, Helsten T, Beckwith H, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Consortium, Berry DA, Asare SM, Esserman LJ, Boughey JC, Mukhtar RA. The impact of local therapy on locoregional recurrence in women with high risk breast cancer in the neoadjuvant I-SPY2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Silverstein
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - L Suleiman
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - C Yau
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - ER Price
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - R Singhrao
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - D Yee
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - A DeMichele
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - C Isaacs
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - KS Albain
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - AJ Chien
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - A Forero-Torres
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - AM Wallace
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - L Pusztai
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - ED Ellis
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - AD Elias
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - JE Lang
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - J Lu
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - HS Han
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - AS Clark
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - L Korde
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - R Nanda
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - DW Northfelt
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - QJ Khan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - RK Viscusi
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - DM Euhus
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - KK Edmiston
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - SY Chui
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - K Kemmer
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - WC Wood
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - JW Park
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - MC Liu
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - O Olopade
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - B Leyland-Jones
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - D Tripathy
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - SL Moulder
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - HS Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - R Schwab
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - S Lo
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - T Helsten
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - H Beckwith
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - DA Berry
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - SM Asare
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - LJ Esserman
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - JC Boughey
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | - RA Mukhtar
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Dallas, TX; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Genentech, Portland, OR; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Rochester, MN; Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
O'Shaughnessy J, Wright GS, Thummala AR, Danso MA, Popovic L, Pluard TJ, Cheung E, Han HS, Daniel BR, Vojnovic Z, Vasev N, Ling M, Richards DA, Wilks ST, Milenkovic D, Sorrentino JA, Roberts PJ, Bomar M, Yang Z, Antal JM, Malik RK, Morris SR, Tan A. Abstract PD1-01: Trilaciclib (T), a CDK4/6 inhibitor, dosed with gemcitabine (G), carboplatin (C) in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients: Preliminary phase 2 results. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-pd1-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced damage of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) results in acute toxicities consisting of multi-lineage myelosuppression, and late onset toxicities consisting of progressive bone marrow suppression with increased incidence of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. T is an IV CDK4/6 inhibitor in development to preserve HSPC and immune system function during cytotoxic chemotherapy (myelopreservation). Proof of concept for myelopreservation with T was observed in a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial in small-cell lung cancer patients receiving 1st-line chemotherapy. This trial in mTNBC patients (NCT02978716) was designed to explore the utility of T in combination with GC.
Methods: This Phase 2, randomized, open-label study enrolled patients in the US and EU with mTNBC who had received 0-2 prior systemic cytotoxic therapies in the locally recurrent or metastatic setting and had no symptomatic brain metastases. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to GC alone (Group 1) or T plus GC (Group 2) using a standard schedule (D1, 8 every 21 days) or to an alternative schedule (T on D1, 2, 8 and 9 with GC on D2 and 9 every 21 days; Group 3). On those days when both T and GC were scheduled, T was administered iv prior to GC infusion. Prophylactic growth factors were not administered in cycle 1; otherwise supportive care was allowed as needed. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability; tumor response was evaluated using RECIST v1.1 and PFS and OS were assessed. Myelopreservation endpoints reflecting the potential effects of T on multiple cellular lineages include occurrence of Grade 4 neutropenia (primary), RBC and platelet transfusions (primary), and lymphocyte counts with immune profiling (secondary and exploratory). A signature of CDK4/6 independence developed from preclinical data will be used to evaluate archival tumor tissue samples and data analysis is ongoing.
Results: 95 patients were dosed; median age 57 years (range 32,86), ECOG PS 0 (53%) or 1 (47%), 25% had liver metastases at baseline, and approximately 50% had received no systemic therapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting. Fifty-five patients remain on treatment. Disease progression was the most common reason for drug discontinuation (22/40; 55%). Overall the most common (≥ 25%) TEAEs were anemia (47%), nausea (35%), fatigue (34%), neutropenia (32%), platelet count decreased (25%), and vomiting (25%). The most frequent (≥ 15%) Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs were hematologic toxicities, i.e. neutropenia (28%), anemia (21%), neutrophil count decreased (21%) and thrombocytopenia (16%). These were also the most frequent drug-related TEAEs observed. Tumor efficacy data are being evaluated.
Conclusions: This trial, assessing the myelopreservation effects of T when combined with GC in patients with mTNBC, has completed enrollment. Myelopreservation data, immune profiling, as well as ORR and preliminary PFS results will be presented by study arm at the meeting.
Citation Format: O'Shaughnessy J, Wright GS, Thummala AR, Danso MA, Popovic L, Pluard TJ, Cheung E, Han HS, Daniel BR, Vojnovic Z, Vasev N, Ling M, Richards DA, Wilks ST, Milenkovic D, Sorrentino JA, Roberts PJ, Bomar M, Yang Z, Antal JM, Malik RK, Morris SR, Tan A. Trilaciclib (T), a CDK4/6 inhibitor, dosed with gemcitabine (G), carboplatin (C) in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients: Preliminary phase 2 results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J O'Shaughnessy
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - GS Wright
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - AR Thummala
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - MA Danso
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - L Popovic
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - TJ Pluard
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - E Cheung
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - HS Han
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - BR Daniel
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - Z Vojnovic
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - N Vasev
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - M Ling
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - DA Richards
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - ST Wilks
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - D Milenkovic
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - JA Sorrentino
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - PJ Roberts
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - M Bomar
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - Z Yang
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - JM Antal
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - RK Malik
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - SR Morris
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| | - A Tan
- Texas Oncology Baylor Sammons, US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Florida Cancer Specialists (North), Saint Petersburg, FL; Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, US Oncology Research, Las Vegas, NV; Virginia Oncology Specialists, US Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA; Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Innovative Clinical Research Institute, Whittier, CA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Tennessee Oncology – Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN; County Hospital Varazdin, Varaždin, Croatia; University Clinic of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Skopje, Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of; Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, US Oncology Research, Denver, CO; Texas Oncology Tyler, US Oncology Research, Tyler, TX; Texas Oncology San Antonio Northeast, US Oncology Research, San Antonio, TX; Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Oncology, Niš, Serbia; G1 Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, NC; Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlo
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hylton NM, Symmans WF, Yau C, Li W, Hatzis C, Isaacs C, Albain KS, Chen YY, Krings G, Wei S, Harada S, Datnow B, Fadare O, Klein M, Pambuccian S, Chen B, Adamson K, Sams S, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Magliocco A, Feldman M, Rendi M, Sattar H, Zeck J, Ocal I, Tawfik O, Grasso LeBeau L, Sahoo S, Vinh T, Yang S, Adams A, Chien AJ, Ferero-Torres A, Stringer-Reasor E, Wallace A, Boughey JC, Ellis ED, Elias AD, Lang JE, Lu J, Han HS, Clark AS, Korde L, Nanda R, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Viscusi RK, Euhus DM, Edmiston KK, Chui SY, Kemmer K, Wood WC, Park JW, Liu MC, Olopade O, Tripathy D, Moulder SL, Rugo HS, Schwab R, Lo S, Helsten T, Beckwith H, Haugen PK, van't Veer LJ, Perlmutter J, Melisko ME, Wilson A, Peterson G, Asare AL, Buxton MB, Paoloni M, Clennell JL, Hirst GL, Singhrao R, Steeg K, Matthews JB, Sanil A, Berry SM, Abe H, Wolverton D, Crane EP, Ward KA, Nelson M, Niell BL, Oh K, Brandt KR, Bang DH, Ojeda-Fournier H, Eghtedari M, Sheth PA, Bernreuter WK, Umphrey H, Rosen MA, Dogan B, Yang W, Joe B, Yee D, Pusztai L, DeMichele A, Asare SM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Abstract P2-07-03: Refining neoadjuvant predictors of three year distant metastasis free survival: Integrating volume change as measured by MRI with residual cancer burden. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p2-07-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Patients achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy have significantly improved event-free survival relative to those who do not; and pCR is an FDA-accepted endpoint to support accelerated approval of novel agents/combinations in the neoadjuvant treatment of high risk early stage breast cancer. Previous studies have shown that recurrence risk increased with increasing burden of residual disease (as assessed by the RCB index). As well, these studies suggest that patients with minimum residual disease (RCB-I class) also have favorable outcomes (comparable to those achieving a pCR) within high risk tumor subtypes. In this study, we assess whether integrating RCB with MRI functional tumor volume (FTV), which in itself is prognostic, can improve prediction of distant recurrence free survival (DRFS); and identify a subset of patients with minimal residual disease with comparable DRFS as those who achieved a pCR. Imaging tools can then be used to identify the subset that will do well early and guide the timing of surgical therapy.
Method: We performed a pooled analysis of 596 patients from the I-SPY2 TRIAL with RCB, pre-surgical MRI FTV data and known follow-up (median 2.5 years). We first assessed whether FTV predicts residual disease (pCR or pCR/RCB-I) using ROC analysis. We applied a power transformation to normalize the pre-surgical FTV distribution; and assessed its association with DRFS using a bi-variate Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for HR/HER2 subtype. We also fitted a bivariate Cox model of RCB index adjusting for subtype; and assessed whether adding pre-surgical FTV to this model further improves association with DRFS using a likelihood ratio (LR) test. For the Cox modeling, penalized splines approximation of the transformed FTV and RCB index with 2 degrees of freedom was used to allow for non-linear effects of FTV and RCB on DRFS.
Result: Pre-surgical MRI FTV is significantly associated with DRFS (Wald p<0.00001), and more effective at predicting pCR/RCB-I than predicting pCR alone (AUC: 0.72 vs. 0.65). Larger pre-surgical FTV remains associated with worse DRFS adjusting for subtype (Wald p <0.00001). The RCB index is also significantly associated with DRFS adjusting for subtype (Wald p<0.00001). Adding FTV to a model containing RCB and subtype further improves association with DRFS (LR p=0.0007). RCB-I patients have excellent DRFS (94% at 3 years compared to 95% in the pCR group). Efforts are underway to identify an optimal threshold for dichotomizing pre-surgical FTV and FTV change measures for use in combination with pCR/RCB-I class to generate integrated RCB (iRCB) groups as a composite predictor of DRFS.
Conclusion: Pre-surgical MRI FTV is effective at predicting minimal residual disease (RCB0/I) in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. Despite the association between FTV and RCB, FTV appears to provide independent added prognostic value (to RCB and subtype), suggesting that integrating MRI volume measures and RCB into a composite predictor may improve DRFS prediction.
Citation Format: Hylton NM, Symmans WF, Yau C, Li W, Hatzis C, Isaacs C, Albain KS, Chen Y-Y, Krings G, Wei S, Harada S, Datnow B, Fadare O, Klein M, Pambuccian S, Chen B, Adamson K, Sams S, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Magliocco A, Feldman M, Rendi M, Sattar H, Zeck J, Ocal I, Tawfik O, Grasso LeBeau L, Sahoo S, Vinh T, Yang S, Adams A, Chien AJ, Ferero-Torres A, Stringer-Reasor E, Wallace A, Boughey JC, Ellis ED, Elias AD, Lang JE, Lu J, Han HS, Clark AS, Korde L, Nanda R, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Viscusi RK, Euhus DM, Edmiston KK, Chui SY, Kemmer K, Wood WC, Park JW, Liu MC, Olopade O, Tripathy D, Moulder SL, Rugo HS, Schwab R, Lo S, Helsten T, Beckwith H, Haugen PK, van't Veer LJ, Perlmutter J, Melisko ME, Wilson A, Peterson G, Asare AL, Buxton MB, Paoloni M, Clennell JL, Hirst GL, Singhrao R, Steeg K, Matthews JB, Sanil A, Berry SM, Abe H, Wolverton D, Crane EP, Ward KA, Nelson M, Niell BL, Oh K, Brandt KR, Bang DH, Ojeda-Fournier H, Eghtedari M, Sheth PA, Bernreuter WK, Umphrey H, Rosen MA, Dogan B, Yang W, Joe B, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Consortium, Yee D, Pusztai L, DeMichele A, Asare SM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Refining neoadjuvant predictors of three year distant metastasis free survival: Integrating volume change as measured by MRI with residual cancer burden [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- NM Hylton
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - WF Symmans
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - C Yau
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - W Li
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - C Hatzis
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - C Isaacs
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - KS Albain
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - Y-Y Chen
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - G Krings
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Wei
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Harada
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - B Datnow
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - O Fadare
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Klein
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Pambuccian
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - B Chen
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - K Adamson
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Sams
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - P Mhawech-Fauceglia
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Magliocco
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Feldman
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Rendi
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - H Sattar
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - J Zeck
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - I Ocal
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - O Tawfik
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - L Grasso LeBeau
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Sahoo
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - T Vinh
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Yang
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Adams
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - AJ Chien
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Ferero-Torres
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - E Stringer-Reasor
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Wallace
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - JC Boughey
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - ED Ellis
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - AD Elias
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - JE Lang
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - J Lu
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - HS Han
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - AS Clark
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - L Korde
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - R Nanda
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - DW Northfelt
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - QJ Khan
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - RK Viscusi
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - DM Euhus
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - KK Edmiston
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - SY Chui
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - K Kemmer
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - WC Wood
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - JW Park
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - MC Liu
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - O Olopade
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - D Tripathy
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - SL Moulder
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - HS Rugo
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - R Schwab
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Lo
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - T Helsten
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - H Beckwith
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - PK Haugen
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - LJ van't Veer
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - J Perlmutter
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - ME Melisko
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Wilson
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - G Peterson
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - AL Asare
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - MB Buxton
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Paoloni
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - JL Clennell
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - GL Hirst
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - R Singhrao
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - K Steeg
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - JB Matthews
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Sanil
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - SM Berry
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - H Abe
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - D Wolverton
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - EP Crane
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - KA Ward
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Nelson
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - BL Niell
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - K Oh
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - KR Brandt
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - DH Bang
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - H Ojeda-Fournier
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Eghtedari
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - PA Sheth
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - WK Bernreuter
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - H Umphrey
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - MA Rosen
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - B Dogan
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - W Yang
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - B Joe
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - D Yee
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - L Pusztai
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A DeMichele
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - SM Asare
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - DA Berry
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - LJ Esserman
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kim JY, Lee EJ, Park KH, Im SA, Kim SB, Sohn SH, Lee KS, Chae YS, Lee KH, Kim JH, Im YH, Kim TY, Lee KH, Ahn JH, Kim GM, Park IH, Lee SJ, Han HS, Kim SH, Jung KH, Park YH. Abstract P3-11-07: Exploratory biomarker analysis from a phase II, multicenter, randomized trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine(EG) versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine(PG) as first-line chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- negative metastatic breast cancer(MBC): Korean cancer study group trial (KCSG BR13-11). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-11-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction : A phase II, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of the comparison between eribulin plus gemcitabine (EG) and paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PG) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) found EG was less neurotoxic, but had similar efficacy of PG. In this study, we performed exploratory biomarker analysis of the impact of genetic alterations on the efficacy according to EG and PG chemotherapy.
Methods : This biomarker study was conducted using tumor samples from 40patients. When tissue collection was possible after disease progression, we performed paired sample analysis. Tumor DNA and RNA were extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. To perform targeted deep sequencing, we used CancerScanTM, a 375 cancer gene panel. And we performed an nCounter expression assay for gene expression analysis using 730 PanCancer panel and 730 Immune panel.
Results: In total, we obtained 44 tissue samples from 40 patients. Twenty two patients were assigned in EG arm and 18 patients were in PG arm. Thirty-eight were at baseline and six after disease progression. Gene expression assay were performed in 44 tissue samples but only 31 samples were possible to be targeted deep sequencing.
We performed differently expressed gene(DEG) analysis for detecting the association between level of gene expression and disease progression. In this analysis, high expression of CCNE1, TGFB4 and BAMBI and low expression of DDB2, CD14 and SHC3 were associated with disease progression among 730 PanCancer panel genes (p<0.05, respectively). In terms of immune panel genes, most of immune related genes were highly expressed in a group without disease progression compared with that with disease progression. Only 2 genes, C8G and CD24 were highly expressed in a group with disease progression. Paired sample analysis showed that expression levels of THBS4 and CD27 decreased after disease progression while those of CCNE2 and FGFR4 increased.
In targeted deep sequencing, FAT3 (42.3%) was most frequently mutated gene followed by PKHD1, PIK3CA and TP53. Among mutated genes, EWSR1 mutation and upstream mutation of ETV1 were associated with disease progression, respectively (p<0.05, respectively). In mutation signature analysis, signature 1 (S, age related), S3(homologous recombination deficiency, HRD), S6 (mismatch repair, MMR), S20(MMR) and S21(microsatellite instability, MSI) were enriched in this population. Mutation signature 3 related to short disease free survival (p=0.0026).
Conclusion: In gene expression analysis, high expression of TGF-B signaling pathway related genes was associated with disease progression while high expression of immune related genes were related to prolonged disease free survival. In mutation analysis, EWSR1 and ETV1 mutations indicated short disease free interval and HRD mutation signature was also related to poor prognosis.
Citation Format: Kim J-Y, Lee EJ, Park KH, Im S-A, Kim S-B, Sohn SH, Lee KS, Chae YS, Lee KH, Kim JH, Im Y-H, Kim T-Y, Lee K-H, Ahn J-H, Kim GM, Park IH, Lee SJ, Han HS, Kim SH, Jung KH, Park YH. Exploratory biomarker analysis from a phase II, multicenter, randomized trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine(EG) versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine(PG) as first-line chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- negative metastatic breast cancer(MBC): Korean cancer study group trial (KCSG BR13-11) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-Y Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - EJ Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - KH Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - S-A Im
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - S-B Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - SH Sohn
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - KS Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - YS Chae
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - KH Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - JH Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Y-H Im
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - T-Y Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - K-H Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - J-H Ahn
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - GM Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - IH Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - SJ Lee
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - HS Han
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - SH Kim
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - KH Jung
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - YH Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Samsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea; Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea; Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chong GO, Jeong SY, Lee YH, Lee HJ, Lee SW, Han HS, Hong DG, Lee YS. The ability of whole-body SUVmax in F-18 FDG PET/CT to predict suboptimal cytoreduction during primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res 2019; 12:12. [PMID: 30717813 PMCID: PMC6360666 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-019-0488-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to (1) evaluate the ability of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) parameters to predict suboptimal cytoreduction and (2) to create a risk model for predicting suboptimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer. From 2011 to 2015, 51 patients underwent primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled. A residual disease with maximal diameter > 1 cm was considered a suboptimal surgical result. The SUVmax values for nine abdominal regions, the sum of 9 regional SUVmax (WB1SUVmax) and WB2SUVmax (WB1SUVmax plus SUVmax of lymph nodes) were used for PET parameter. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictive value of PET and clinical parameters for risk model. In addition, assessments of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed. Results Seventeen of the 51 patients (33.3%) underwent suboptimal cytoreduction. The ECOG status (OR, 4.091), SUVmax of central (OR, 5.250), right upper (OR, 4.148), left upper (OR, 5.921) and WB2SUVmax (OR, 4.148) were associated with suboptimal cytoreduction. The risk model can divide the risk groups of suboptimal cytoreduction (area under the curve (AUC), 0.775; p = 0.0001). The DFS and OS in the high-risk group were significantly worse than those in the low-risk group (p = 0.0379 for DFS; p = 0.0211 for OS). Conclusions The presence of hypermetabolic lesions in the central, right upper, and left upper regions showed predictive value for suboptimal cytoreduction. Our risk model may be helpful for selecting patients who may show suboptimal cytoreduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.,Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, 41404, Republic of Korea
| | - Shin Young Jeong
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, 41404, Republic of Korea.
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, 41404, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Woo Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 130 Dongdeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, 41404, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.,Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Gy Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, 41404, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Soon Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, 41404, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chong GO, Han HS, Park JY, Lee SD, Lee YH, Lee HJ, Hong DG, Lee YS. Prevalence, survival outcomes, and clinicopathologic factors associated with negative high risk human papillomavirus in surgical specimens of cervical cancer with pretreatment negative DNA genotype test. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:10-16. [PMID: 30640677 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to detect high risk human papillomavirus in cervical cancer with a pretreatment negative high risk human papillomavirus DNA genotype test and to evaluate clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes according to high risk human papillomavirus status. METHODS We investigated high risk human papillomavirus status in surgical specimens from 30 cases of cervical cancer using polymerase chain reaction. Polymerase chain reaction primers were set to detect the presence of the common L1 and E7 regions of human papillomavirus types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58. We analyzed the following clinicopathologic parameters to evaluate their relationships with high risk human papillomavirus status: age, histology, stage, tumor size, invasion depth, lymphovascular invasion, and recurrent status. RESULTS Among 30 cases with a pretreatment negative DNA genotype test, high risk human papillomavirus was detected in 12 (40.0%), whereas 18 (60.0%) were negatives. Of 12 high risk human papillomavirus positive cases, 10 (33.3%) were positive for the L1 region, 6 (20.0%) of the 7 types were positive for the E7 region, and 4 (13.1%) were positive for both L1 and E7 regions. According to a multiple logistic regression model, tumor size (odds ratio 7.80; 95% confidence interval 1.476 to 41.216; P=0.0097) and stage (odds ratio 7.00; 95% confidence interval 1.293 to 37.910; P=0.0173) were associated with negative high risk human papillomavirus DNA status. Kaplan-Meier survival plots showed that negative high risk human papillomavirus status was associated with worse disease free survival in contrast with positive high risk human papillomavirus status (P=0.0392). CONCLUSIONS Negative high risk human papillomavirus was found in 60% of cervical cancers with a pretreatment negative DNA genotype test. Moreover, the negative high risk human papillomavirus group was associated with worse survival outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.,Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea .,Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Young Park
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Seon Duk Lee
- Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Gy Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Soon Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Joung S, Kim J, Kwak S, Park KR, Hahn SH, Han HS, Kim HS, Bak JG, Lee SG, Ghim YC. Imputation of faulty magnetic sensors with coupled Bayesian and Gaussian processes to reconstruct the magnetic equilibrium in real time. Rev Sci Instrum 2018; 89:10K106. [PMID: 30399691 DOI: 10.1063/1.5038938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
A Bayesian with Gaussian process-based numerical method to impute a few missing magnetic signals caused by impaired magnetic probes during tokamak operations is developed such that the real-time reconstruction of magnetic equilibria, whose performance strongly depends on the measured magnetic signals and their intactness, is affected minimally. Likelihood of the Bayesian model constructed with Maxwell's equations, specifically Gauss's law for magnetism and Ampère's law, results in an infinite number of solutions if two or more magnetic signals are missing. This undesirable characteristic of the Bayesian model is remediated by coupling the model with the Gaussian process. Our proposed numerical method infers nine non-consecutive missing magnetic signals correctly in less than 1 ms suitable for the real-time reconstruction of magnetic equilibria during tokamak operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semin Joung
- Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
| | - Jaewook Kim
- Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
| | - Sehyun Kwak
- Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
| | - Kyeo-Reh Park
- Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
| | - S H Hahn
- National Fusion Research Institute, Daejeon 34133, South Korea
| | - H S Han
- National Fusion Research Institute, Daejeon 34133, South Korea
| | - H S Kim
- National Fusion Research Institute, Daejeon 34133, South Korea
| | - J G Bak
- National Fusion Research Institute, Daejeon 34133, South Korea
| | - S G Lee
- National Fusion Research Institute, Daejeon 34133, South Korea
| | - Y-C Ghim
- Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lee DE, Lee H, Lee SD, Han HS, Choe JY, Yun S, Park HJ, Park J, Kim JK. Comparison of different methods of RNA preparation from peripheral blood for nucleic acid amplification assay. Indian J Med Microbiol 2018; 36:77-80. [PMID: 29735831 DOI: 10.4103/ijmm.ijmm_18_104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Nucleic acid amplification assays (NAAs), such as polymerase chain reaction or loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), are used for disease diagnosis. Current nucleic acid isolation kits require several hours for completion of protocol including the complicated handling steps. Objective In this study, a simple and cost-effective nucleic acid preparation method was developed, and its performance was compared with those of commercial kits. Materials and Methods RNA was prepared using our method and three commercial RNA isolation kits. The RNA quantity and quality were evaluated using the NanoDrop spectrophotometer and Agilent 2100 bioanalyser. Reverse transcription LAMP (RT-LAMP) reactions were performed to determine the usability of the RNA preparation methods. Results The concentrations of RNA extracted from blood samples by four different methods were sufficient for use in NAAs. The RNA integrity number was> 7.0 when RNA was isolated using other RNA isolation kits but lower when prepared using our method. The RT-LAMP reaction was successfully performed when RNA was prepared using any of the methods. Conclusions These results demonstrate that despite the lower purity and integrity of RNA, our RNA preparation protocol is simple and rapid and shows reasonable performance in RT-LAMP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Eun Lee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Hanna Lee
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Seon Duk Lee
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Jae Young Choe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Sora Yun
- Mmonitor Inc., Daegu, South Korea
| | | | - Jungbae Park
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Jong Kun Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Park J, Kim JH, Suk K, Han HS, Ohk B, Kim DG. Selective Brain Hypothermia Augmenting Neuroprotective Effects of Decompressive Craniectomy for Permanent Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction in a Rat Model. World Neurosurg 2018; 121:e181-e190. [PMID: 30261392 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the combined effects of a decompressive craniectomy and prolonged selective brain hypothermia on large hemispheric infarction in a rat model. METHODS Permanent middle cerebral artery infarction using an endovascular occlusion technique was created in rats assigned to 4 groups. Normothermia was maintained without a craniectomy in group A (n = 20) as the control, prolonged (>44 hours), selective brain hypothermic treatment was performed on group B (n = 20), a craniectomy was performed on group C (n = 18), and prolonged, selective brain hypothermic treatment using a cooling coil implanted in the craniectomy site was combined with a craniectomy for group D (n = 18). RESULTS Group B and C exhibited a significantly reduced infarct volume when compared with the control. Furthermore, group D showed a significantly reduced infarct volume when compared with group C, plus a significantly improved neurologic score. These results for group D were associated with an increased neuronal cell count and reduced hyperactive microglia and hypertrophic astrocytes in the cortical penumbra (P < 0.01). Moreover, a greater preservation of normal-appearing axonal bundles and the blood-brain barrier was observed in the core infarct region at the caudoputamen. CONCLUSIONS A decompressive craniectomy reduced the infarct volume and improved the neurologic outcomes in a rat model of middle cerebral artery infarction. Furthermore, when combined with prolonged selective brain hypothermia, significant additional benefits were observed for the neurologic outcomes, infarct volume, and degree of neuroinflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaechan Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jong-Heon Kim
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoungho Suk
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Boram Ohk
- Clinical Trial Center, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Gyu Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Choe JY, Han HS, Lee SD, Lee H, Lee DE, Ahn JY, Ryoo HW, Seo KS, Kim JK. A comparative study of three different gene expression analysis methods. Technol Health Care 2018; 25:1073-1080. [PMID: 28854526 DOI: 10.3233/thc-170967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND TNF-α regulates immune cells and acts as an endogenous pyrogen. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is one of the most commonly used methods for gene expression analysis. Among the alternatives to PCR, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) shows good potential in terms of specificity and sensitivity. OBJECTIVE However, few studies have compared RT-PCR and LAMP for human gene expression analysis. Therefore, in the present study, we compared one-step RT-PCR, two-step RT-LAMP and one-step RT-LAMP for human gene expression analysis. METHODS We compared three gene expression analysis methods using the human TNF-α gene as a biomarker from peripheral blood cells. Total RNA from the three selected febrile patients were subjected to the three different methods of gene expression analysis. RESULTS In the comparison of three gene expression analysis methods, the detection limit of both one-step RT-PCR and one-step RT-LAMP were the same, while that of two-step RT-LAMP was inferior. One-step RT-LAMP takes less time, and the experimental result is easy to determine. CONCLUSIONS One-step RT-LAMP is a potentially useful and complementary tool that is fast and reasonably sensitive. In addition, one-step RT-LAMP could be useful in environments lacking specialized equipment or expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Young Choe
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Seon Duk Lee
- Department of Physiology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hanna Lee
- Department of Physiology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Dong Eun Lee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jae Yun Ahn
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyun Wook Ryoo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Kang Suk Seo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jong Kun Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Oh J, Joung HA, Han HS, Kim JK, Kim MG. A hook effect-free immunochromatographic assay (HEF-ICA) for measuring the C-reactive protein concentration in one drop of human serum. Am J Cancer Res 2018; 8:3189-3197. [PMID: 29930722 PMCID: PMC6010992 DOI: 10.7150/thno.24034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The immunochromatographic (ICA) assay is a highly promising platform for rapid and simple detection of C-reactive protein (CRP) which is an indicator of the different phases of various diseases, as well as of inflammation and infection. However, the hook effect in the ICA assay limits the quantification of CRP levels at high CRP concentrations. Methods: In this study, we developed a hook effect-free immunochromatographic assay (HEF-ICA) to detect CRP over a wide concentration range. The hook effect results from the simultaneous reaction of an excess target antigens with both immobilized and labeled antibodies respectively. To reduce the potential occurrence of this simultaneous reaction, we separated the migration of the target antigen and gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-labeled antibodies on a nitrocellulose membrane and analyzed the time profiles by modifying the ICA structure. Results: The signal intensity of HEF-ICA was saturated at high CRP concentrations, without decreasing. The titration curve of HEF-ICA was adjusted with the Hill equation, and HEF-ICA was performed with the following parameters: limit of detection, 43 ng mL-1; dynamic range, 119 ng mL-1 to 100 µg mL-1. The accuracy of the newly developed assay was evaluated using 33 clinical samples via comparison with a clinical chemistry analyzer. Conclusion: HEF-ICA enabled the measurement of a wide range of CRP concentrations without the hook effect, and was suitable for point-of-care testing with fingertip blood sampling, as only a minute sample volume (2.5 µL) was required.
Collapse
|
38
|
Forero A, Han HS, Dees EC, Wesolowski R, Bardia A, Kabos P, Kern KA, Perea R, Pierce KJ, Houk B, Rugo HS. Abstract OT2-07-06: Phase Ib study to assess the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of gedatolisib in combination with palbociclib and either letrozole or fulvestrant in women with metastatic or locally advanced/recurrent breast cancer (B2151009). Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-ot2-07-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:Hormone receptor positive (HR+) disease is the most common subset of advanced breast cancer (BC). The majority of women with HR+ metastatic BC (MBC) develop resistance to endocrine therapy (ET), with a median survival of 2-3 years. A new strategy to treat HR+ MBC involves the combination of ET and a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi 4/6), which has demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) in both first-and later-line MBC. Preclinical evidence in PI3K-mutant cell-line xenografts demonstrated that combinations of PI3K and CDK4/6i reduced intrinsic and adaptive resistance to ET, leading to tumor regression (Vara, 2004; Pfizer data). Inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR pathway by gedatolisib (G) may provide a new therapy to overcome ET resistance. These findings support developing the triplet combination of G with the CDKi 4/6 palbociclib (P)+letrozole (L) or fulvestrant (F) for the treatment of patients (pts) with ER+/HER2- BC.
Methods: This ongoing study in women with ER+/HER2- MBC, in first- and later-line settings, includes a dose-escalation (DE) to evaluate dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs, primary endpoint [pEP]) and determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for a triplet regimen of G+P+L or G+P+F. The escalation rules follow the modified toxicity probability interval method (G doses: 180 and 215 mg IV weekly). Treatment assignment to the triplet is based on investigator decision and bone-only disease is permitted. After RP2D determination for each triplet, a 3-arm expansion for early signs of efficacy (ESOE) will investigate objective response rate (ORR) compared to historical controls [pEP] of Arm A) G+P+L in first-line, B) G+P+F in pts with no prior CDKi 4/6 in second-line and C) G+P+F in pts who have received prior CDKi 4/6. Pts receive G+P (125 mg oral daily for 21 days [D] on and 7 D off) + L (2.5 mg oral daily) or F (500 mg IM on D1, 15 of cycle [C] 1; D1 of C2 and then 500 mg IM on D1 of all 28-D cycles). Secondary endpoints include safety, tumor response (DE), PFS (ESOE), pharmacokinetics (PK), and biomarker correlations associated with the PI3K/mTOR pathway.
Results: 27 pts received G (180 mg/week) in combination with P+L (L cohort, n=12) or P+F (F cohort, n=15). Median prior therapies were: L cohort: 1 (range: 0-4); F cohort: 2 (range 1-5). The 3 most common, drug-related adverse events (%) were in L cohort: nausea (75), neutropenia (67), and stomatitis (67); F cohort: stomatitis (67), nausea (60), and neutropenia (53). C1 DLTs were: L cohort: grade (gr) 3 neutropenia (n=1); F cohort: gr 3 stomatitis (n=1). Preliminary rates of stable disease/partial response were: L cohort: 33%/16%; F cohort: 40%/13%. PK parameters and next-generation sequencing of PI3K-related mutations are pending.
Conclusions: G can be combined with P+L or P+F with manageable toxicity and promising preliminary antitumor activity, even in heavily pretreated pts. Dose escalation, followed by expansion for ESOE, is ongoing.
This study is sponsored by Pfizer. Editorial support was provided by Engage Scientific Solutions and was funded by Pfizer.
Citation Format: Forero A, Han HS, Dees EC, Wesolowski R, Bardia A, Kabos P, Kern KA, Perea R, Pierce KJ, Houk B, Rugo HS. Phase Ib study to assess the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of gedatolisib in combination with palbociclib and either letrozole or fulvestrant in women with metastatic or locally advanced/recurrent breast cancer (B2151009) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-07-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Forero
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - HS Han
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - EC Dees
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - R Wesolowski
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - A Bardia
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - P Kabos
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - KA Kern
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - R Perea
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - KJ Pierce
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - B Houk
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - HS Rugo
- University of Alabama Comprehensive at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC; Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, CA; Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Modi S, Pusztai L, Forero A, Mita M, Miller KD, Weise A, Krop I, Burris H, Kalinsky K, Tsai M, Liu MC, Hurvitz SA, Wilks S, Ademuyiwa F, Diab S, Han HS, Kato G, Nanda R, O'Shaughnessy J, Kostic A, Li M, Specht J. Abstract PD3-14: Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd3-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
LIV-1, a transmembrane protein and downstream target of STAT3, is highly expressed in breast cancer cells. It is associated with lymph node involvement and metastatic progression. SGN-LIV1A is an anti-LIV-1 antibody conjugated via a protease-cleavable linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Upon binding to cell-surface LIV-1, SGN-LIV1A is internalized and releases MMAE, which disrupts microtubulin and induces apoptosis.
Methods
This ongoing, phase 1 study evaluates safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-LIV1A (q3wks IV) in women with LIV-1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC) (NCT01969643). Patients (pts) with measurable disease and ≥2 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC are eligible. Pts with ≥ Grade 2 neuropathy are excluded. Response is assessed per RECIST v1.1; pts with stable disease (SD) or better can continue treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. At completion of dose escalation in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) and triple-negative (TN) pts, expansion cohorts were opened to further evaluate safety and antitumor activity of monotherapy in TN pts. Tumor biopsies are evaluated for LIV-1 expression.
Results
To date, 69 pts (18 HR+/HER2–, 51 TN) have received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1–12) of SGN-LIV1A at doses of 0.5–2.8 mg/kg. Median age was 56 yrs. Pts had a median of 3 prior cytotoxic regimens for LA/MBC; 58 had visceral disease and 37 had bone metastases. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 19 DLT-evaluable pts; maximum tolerated dose was not exceeded at 2.8 mg/kg. Expansion cohorts of TN pts were opened at 2.0 and 2.5 mg/kg. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥25% of pts were fatigue (59%), nausea (51%), peripheral neuropathy (44%), alopecia (36%), decreased appetite (33%), constipation (30%), abdominal pain, diarrhea, and neutropenia (25% each). Most AEs were Grade 1/2; AEs ≥ Grade 3 included neutropenia (25%) and anemia (15%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 2 pts whose total dose exceeded 200 mg per cycle, including 1 treatment-related death due to sepsis. No other treatment-related deaths occurred on-study. Seven pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. In dose escalation, activity was observed in 17 efficacy evaluable (EE) HR+/HER2- pts, with a disease control rate (DCR= CR+PR+SD) of 59% (10 SD), including 1 pt with SD ≥24 wks. Among the 44 EE TN pts (dose escalation plus expansion cohorts), the objective response rate (ORR) was 32% (14 PR) with a confirmed PR rate of 21%, DCR was 64% (14 PR, 14 SD), and clinical benefit rate (CBR=CR+PR+SD ≥24 wks) was 36% (16 pts). For TN pts, median PFS was 11.3 wks (95% CI: 6.1, 17.1); 10 pts remain on treatment.
Of 631 MBC tumor samples of all clinical subtypes evaluated for LIV-1, 91% were positive; 75% had moderate-to-high expression (H-score ≥100).
Conclusions
LIV-1 is expressed in almost all MBC tumors. SGN-LIV1A monotherapy was generally well tolerated and showed encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated TN MBC, with a PR rate of 32%, confirmed PR rate of 21%, and CBR (≥24 wks) of 36%. Response duration data continue to evolve. Enrollment continues in the TN monotherapy expansion cohort.
Citation Format: Modi S, Pusztai L, Forero A, Mita M, Miller KD, Weise A, Krop I, Burris III H, Kalinsky K, Tsai M, Liu MC, Hurvitz SA, Wilks S, Ademuyiwa F, Diab S, Han HS, Kato G, Nanda R, O'Shaughnessy J, Kostic A, Li M, Specht J. Phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-LIV1A in patients with heavily pretreated triple-negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-14.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Modi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - L Pusztai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Forero
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Mita
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - KD Miller
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Weise
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - I Krop
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - H Burris
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - K Kalinsky
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Tsai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - MC Liu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - SA Hurvitz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - S Wilks
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - F Ademuyiwa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - S Diab
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - HS Han
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - G Kato
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - R Nanda
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - A Kostic
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - M Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| | - J Specht
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, NY; Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Allina Health, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Texas Oncology, San Antonio, TX; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; US Oncology Denver, Denver, CO; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Virginia G. Piper Cancer Care Network, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Seattle Genetics, Inc., Bothell, WA; Seattle Cancer Care Allia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Han HS, Diéras V, Robson M, Palácová M, Marcom PK, Jager A, Bondarenko I, Citrin D, Campone M, Telli ML, Domchek SM, Friedlander M, Kaufman B, Garber JE, Shparyk Y, Chmielowska E, Jakobsen EH, Kaklamani V, Gradishar W, Ratajczak CK, Nickner C, Qin Q, Qian J, Shepherd SP, Isakoff SJ, Puhalla S. Veliparib with temozolomide or carboplatin/paclitaxel versus placebo with carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with BRCA1/2 locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: randomized phase II study. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:154-161. [PMID: 29045554 PMCID: PMC5834075 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Homologous recombination defects in BRCA1/2-mutated tumors result in sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, which interfere with DNA damage repair. Veliparib, a potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, enhanced the antitumor activity of platinum agents and temozolomide in early phase clinical trials. This phase II study examined the safety and efficacy of intermittent veliparib with carboplatin/paclitaxel (VCP) or temozolomide (VT) in patients with BRCA1/2-mutated breast cancer. Patients and methods Eligible patients ≥18 years with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer and a deleterious BRCA1/2 germline mutation were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to VCP, VT, or placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (PCP). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). Results Of 290 randomized patients, 284 were BRCA+, confirmed by central laboratory. For VCP versus PCP, median PFS was 14.1 and 12.3 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.789; 95% CI 0.536-1.162; P = 0.227], interim median OS 28.3 and 25.9 months (HR 0.750; 95% CI 0.503-1.117; P = 0.156), and ORR 77.8% and 61.3% (P = 0.027). For VT (versus PCP), median PFS was 7.4 months (HR 1.858; 95% CI 1.278-2.702; P = 0.001), interim median OS 19.1 months (HR 1.483; 95% CI 1.032-2.131; P = 0.032), and ORR 28.6% (P < 0.001). Safety profile was comparable between carboplatin/paclitaxel arms. Adverse events (all grades) of neutropenia, anemia, alopecia, and neuropathy were less frequent with VT versus PCP. Conclusion Numerical but not statistically significant increases in both PFS and OS were observed in patients with BRCA1/2-mutated recurrent/metastatic breast cancer receiving VCP compared with PCP. The addition of veliparib to carboplatin/paclitaxel significantly improved ORR. There was no clinically meaningful increase in toxicity with VCP versus PCP. VT was inferior to PCP. An ongoing phase III trial is evaluating VCP versus PCP, with optional continuation single-agent therapy with veliparib/placebo if chemotherapy is discontinued without progression, in this patient population. Clinical trial information NCT01506609.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Han
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - V Diéras
- Institut Curie, Paris, France, USA
| | - M Robson
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - M Palácová
- Masarykův Onkologický Ústav, Brno, Czech Republic, Durham, USA
| | | | - A Jager
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Bondarenko
- Dnepropetrovsk Medical Academy, City Hospital #4, Dnipro, Ukraine
| | - D Citrin
- Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, USA
| | - M Campone
- Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - M L Telli
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - S M Domchek
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | - B Kaufman
- Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - J E Garber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - Y Shparyk
- Chemotherapy Department, Lviv State Regional Treatment and Diagnostics Oncology Center, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - E Chmielowska
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, UMK, Torun, Poland
| | - E H Jakobsen
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital/Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - V Kaklamani
- Cancer Therapy and Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - W Gradishar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | | | | | - Q Qin
- AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, USA
| | - J Qian
- AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, USA
| | | | | | - S Puhalla
- University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pistilli B, Pluard T, Urruticoechea A, Farci D, Kong A, Bachelot T, Chan S, Han HS, Jerusalem G, Urban P, Robinson D, Mouhaër SL, Tomaso ED, Massacesi C, Saura C. Phase II study of buparlisib (BKM120) and trastuzumab in patients with HER2+ locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer resistant to trastuzumab-based therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 168:357-364. [PMID: 29198055 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4596-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A Phase Ib study in patients with trastuzumab-resistant, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2- (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer defined the recommended Phase II dose of buparlisib as 100 mg/day in combination with 2 mg/kg weekly trastuzumab, and reported preliminary signs of clinical activity. Here we present results from the Phase II portion. METHODS Patients with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer received buparlisib plus trastuzumab. Study endpoints included safety/tolerability and antitumour activity. The study was extended to include a Phase Ib dose-escalation phase, in which patients with progressive brain metastases also received capecitabine. RESULTS In the Phase II portion, of 50 patients treated with buparlisib and trastuzumab, the most common (≥ 30%) all-grade adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea (54%), nausea (48%), decreased appetite, increased alanine aminotransferase (36% each), increased aspartate aminotransferase (34%), fatigue, rash (32% each), cough and hyperglycemia (30% each). One (2%) patient achieved complete response and four (8%) patients had confirmed partial responses [PR; including two patients with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3 K) pathway-activated tumours]. Overall response rate (ORR) was 10%: the primary endpoint (ORR ≥ 25%) was therefore not met. In the Phase Ib portion, all patients with measurable brain lesions at baseline showed tumour shrinkage to some degree; due to low enrollment, maximum tolerated dose of buparlisib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine was not determined. CONCLUSION Buparlisib plus trastuzumab, as a chemotherapy-free regimen, demonstrated an acceptable safety profile but limited efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated, trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer, and in patients with progressive brain metastases also receiving capecitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Pistilli
- Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard-Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France. .,Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy.
| | - T Pluard
- Saint Luke's Health System, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - A Urruticoechea
- Onkologikoa Foundation, San Sebastian, Spain.,Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Farci
- Ospedale Oncologico, Cagliari, Italy
| | - A Kong
- University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.,University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - T Bachelot
- Centre Léon Bérard et Inserm U1052, Lyon, France
| | - S Chan
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - H S Han
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - G Jerusalem
- CHU Sart Tilman Liège and University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - P Urban
- Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - D Robinson
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - S L Mouhaër
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Rueil-Malmaison, France
| | - E D Tomaso
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Syros Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, MA, USA
| | - C Massacesi
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Rueil-Malmaison, France
| | - C Saura
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chong GO, Lee YH, Han HS, Lee HJ, Park JY, Hong DG, Lee YS, Cho YL. Prognostic value of pre-treatment human papilloma virus DNA status in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 148:97-102. [PMID: 29153540 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although the relationship between human papilloma virus (HPV) and cervical cancer is well established, the prognostic value of HPV status has not been determined, largely because previous studies have yielded conflicting results. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of pre-treatment HPV DNA for predicting tumor recurrence in cervical cancer. METHODS The study included 248 eligible patients who provided cervical cell specimens for HPV genotyping before surgery or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Of these 248 patients, 108 were treated with radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer, and 140 were treated with CCRT for FIGO stage IB2-IV cervical cancer. RESULTS HPV 16 and 18 were the two most common HPV types detected, with prevalence rates of 52.4% and 12.5%, respectively. The pre-treatment HPV DNA test showed that 18.5% of cervical cancers were HPV negative. Multivariate analysis showed that HPV negativity was associated with poorer disease-free survival (DFS) than HPV-positive status (hazard ratio [HR], 3.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-8.58; p=0.0005), and patients with HPV 16-positive cancers had better DFS (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.72; p=0.0019). In the surgery group, only HPV 16 positivity was significantly correlated with DFS (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.96; p=0.0416). In the CCRT group, only HPV negativity was significantly correlated with DFS (HR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.78-7.90; p=0.0005). CONCLUSIONS Pre-treatment HPV DNA status may be a useful prognostic biomarker in cervical cancer. The presence of HPV 16 DNA was associated with better DFS, and HPV negativity was associated with worse DFS. However, larger sample sizes and more comprehensive studies are required to verify our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hyun Jung Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Young Park
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Gy Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Soon Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Lae Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sol Y, Choi SH, Kim HJ, Kim YW, Cho BM, Han HS, Choi KJ. Morphologic mechanisms of increased vascular permeability of triolein emulsion to the blood-brain barrier. Microscopy (Oxf) 2017; 66:366-370. [PMID: 29016922 DOI: 10.1093/jmicro/dfx026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Triolein emulsion has been known to increase vascular permeability in the brain when it is infused into the carotid artery. The purpose of this study was to identify the morphologic mechanism of increased vascular permeability in brain induced by infusion of emulsified triolein into the carotid artery by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Triolein emulsion was infused into the carotid artery of rats. TEM using lanthanum tracer was used to evaluate morphologic changes in endothelium with a focus on transcytotic vesicles and tight junction opening. The treat group showed multiple transcytotic vesicles containing lanthanum tracer within endothelium on TEM. TEM also revealed that lanthanum tracer entered neural interstitium through tight junctions between capillary endothelial cells infrequently in the treat group. No evidence of transcytotic vesicles containing lanthanum tracer or lanthanum leakage through tight junctions was observed in the control group. Transcytosis and the opening of tight junctions appears the pathway for vascular permeability enhancement by triolein. This result could be utilized in studies on the blood-brain barrier and by those searching for chemotherapeutic methods that deliver anti-tumor agents to normally drug inaccessible organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuri Sol
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan 179, Gudeokro, Seogu 602-739, Busan
| | - Seon Hee Choi
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan 179, Gudeokro, Seogu 602-739, Busan
| | - Hak Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan 179, Gudeokro, Seogu 602-739, Busan
| | - Yong-Woo Kim
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan 179, Gudeokro, Seogu 602-739, Busan
| | - Byung Mann Cho
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan
| | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu
| | - Ki J Choi
- Department of Biosafety Evaluation & Control, Korea National Institute of Health, Cheongju, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Seok Y, Joung HA, Byun JY, Jeon HS, Shin SJ, Kim S, Shin YB, Han HS, Kim MG. A Paper-Based Device for Performing Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification with Real-Time Simultaneous Detection of Multiple DNA Targets. Am J Cancer Res 2017; 7:2220-2230. [PMID: 28740546 PMCID: PMC5505055 DOI: 10.7150/thno.18675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Paper-based diagnostic devices have many advantages as a one of the multiple diagnostic test platforms for point-of-care (POC) testing because they have simplicity, portability, and cost-effectiveness. However, despite high sensitivity and specificity of nucleic acid testing (NAT), the development of NAT based on a paper platform has not progressed as much as the others because various specific conditions for nucleic acid amplification reactions such as pH, buffer components, and temperature, inhibitions from technical differences of paper-based device. Here, we propose a paper-based device for performing loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) with real-time simultaneous detection of multiple DNA targets. We determined the optimal chemical components to enable dry conditions for the LAMP reaction without lyophilization or other techniques. We also devised the simple paper device structure by sequentially stacking functional layers, and employed a newly discovered property of hydroxynaphthol blue fluorescence to analyze real-time LAMP signals in the paper device. This proposed platform allowed analysis of three different meningitis DNA samples in a single device with single-step operation. This LAMP-based multiple diagnostic device has potential for real-time analysis with quantitative detection of 102-105 copies of genomic DNA. Furthermore, we propose the transformation of DNA amplification devices to a simple and affordable paper system approach with great potential for realizing a paper-based NAT system for POC testing.
Collapse
|
45
|
Chong GO, Jeon HS, Han HS, Son JW, Lee YH, Hong DG, Park HJ, Lee YS, Cho YL. Overexpression of microRNA-196b Accelerates Invasiveness of Cancer Cells in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Through Regulation of Homeobox A9. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2017; 14:137-141. [PMID: 28387653 DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Revised: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Although microRNAs (miRNAs) are known to influence messenger RNA post-transcriptional control and contribute to human tumorigenesis, little is known about the differences in miRNA expression between primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The purpose of this study was to assess the differential miRNA expression between primary and recurrent EOC and to investigate whether miR-196b could regulate the expression of the Homeobox A9 (HOXA9) gene, and thus affect the invasiveness of cancer cells in recurrent EOC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Microarrays were used to generate the expression profiles of 6658 miRNAs from samples of 10 patients with EOC. miRNA expression patterns were compared between primary and recurrent EOC. Aberrantly expressed miRNA, associated genes, and invasion activities were validated by a luciferase assay and an in vitro invasion assay. RESULTS miRNA microarray analysis identified 33 overexpressed miRNAs (including miR-196b) and 18 under expressed miRNAs in recurrent EOC from 6658 human miRNAs. HOXA9 expression was inversely correlated with miR-196b levels in recurrent EOC. We noted that miR-196b induced ovarian cancer cell invasiveness in recurrent EOC by an in vitro invasion assay. CONCLUSION Overexpression of miR-196b may contribute to invasion activities in recurrent EOC by regulating the HOXA9 gene. Moreover, miR-196b can be a potential biomarker in recurrent EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gun Oh Chong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Hyung Soo Han
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Woong Son
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Hee Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Gy Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Yoon Soon Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Lae Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chow LWC, Biganzoli L, Leo AD, Kuroi K, Han HS, Patel J, Huang CS, Lu YS, Zhu L, Chow CYC, Loo WTY, Glück S, Toi M. Toxicity profile differences of adjuvant docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) between Asian and Caucasian breast cancer patients. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2017; 13:372-378. [PMID: 28371190 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.12682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 01/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM For early-stage breast cancer, four cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) was proven superior to doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in the US Oncology 9375 trial. Given primary prophylactic antibiotics, 5% febrile neutropenia was recorded in a population comprising 75.5% Caucasians. Smaller trials and retrospective studies reviewing TC use in Asian patients did not produce similar incidence rates. This study aims to discover the variable hematological toxicities with TC use in Caucasian and Asian patients. METHODS Breast cancer data was retrospectively reviewed for patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel 60-75 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 from six countries (China, Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Italy, and United States). Similar number of patients with relatively balanced baseline characteristics were chosen for analysis of hematological and nonhematological toxicities and survival data. RESULTS From March 2004 to July 2013, data of 227 patients (127 Asians and 100 Caucasian) patients were analyzed for treatment-related toxicities. During the four cycles of TC, Asians had a significantly higher rate of grade ≥2 neutropenia than Caucasians (45.7% vs 6.0%; P <0.001) and significantly more grade ≥3 neutropenia events were documented (respectively 30.7% vs 4.0%, P <0.001). The prophylactic use of G-CSF was similar; 26.0% in Asians and 28.0% in Caucasian (P = 0.764). There were no differences in nonhematological toxicities. No significant difference in disease-free survival was observed between Asians and Caucasians (log-rank P = 0.910). CONCLUSIONS Ethnic differences in toxicity profile exist between Asian and Caucasian patients given adjuvant TC. Over 30% Asians but less than 5% Caucasians experienced grade ≥3 neutropenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L W C Chow
- State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau Institute of Applied Medicine and Health, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau.,Organisation for Oncology and Translational Research, Hong Kong.,UNIMED Medical Institute, Hong Kong
| | - L Biganzoli
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital of Prato, Italy
| | - A D Leo
- Sandro Pitigliani Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital of Prato, Italy
| | - K Kuroi
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - H S Han
- Department of Women's Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, USA
| | - J Patel
- Department of Women's Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, USA
| | - C S Huang
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Y S Lu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - L Zhu
- Department of Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - W T Y Loo
- Organisation for Oncology and Translational Research, Hong Kong.,UNIMED Medical Institute, Hong Kong
| | - S Glück
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, USA
| | - M Toi
- Organisation for Oncology and Translational Research, Hong Kong.,Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Han HS, Wilks S, Paplomata E, Modiano MR, Becerra C, Braiteh FS, Spira AI, Pluard TJ, Richards DA, Conzen SD, Baker G, Fishman RS, Marcantonio A, O'Shaughnessy J, Nanda R. Abstract P6-12-15: Efficacy results of a phase 1/2 study of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist mifepristone (MIFE) in combination with eribulin in GR-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p6-12-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: GR is variably expressed in TNBC and high expression is associated with poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) early stage breast cancer. Treatment with mifepristone (MIFE) potentiates the effectiveness of chemotherapy in GR+ TNBC xenografts. Enrollment is complete in this study of patients with GR+ TNBC treated at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of MIFE in combination with eribulin. Objectives: To determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical activity of the MIFE plus eribulin combination in pts with GR+ TNBC at the RP2D. Methods: Eligibility: In Part 1 (dose finding), pts with solid tumors; in Part 2 (expansion phase), pts with TNBC (GR result required at time of screening in Part 1, but could be pending at time of screening in Part 2). Up to 5 prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease; ECOG PS 0-1; adequate end-organ function. Design: 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme. After a 7-day lead-in of oral daily MIFE alone, MIFE was continued daily and eribulin was given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. GR+ was defined as >10% of tumor cells with any intensity of GR staining. Results: 16 pts with metastatic breast cancer were treated in Part 1, and 21 pts with TNBC were treated in Part 2. Median age was 54 (range 30-81). MTD/RP2D was MIFE 300 mg/day + eribulin 1.1 mg/m2. Safety: DLT in Part 1 was neutropenia. Neutropenia occurred in 23/36 total patients (2 Grade [G] 1, 10 G3, 11 G4); 2 instances included neutropenic fever. Recovery of WBC was brisk with growth factor support. Neuropathy was observed in 8 pts (5 G1, 1 G2, 2 G3). Other most common AEs (fatigue, hypokalemia, nausea, alopecia) were mainly G1 or G2; among these, G3/G4 events were limited to fatigue (4 G3), hypokalemia (3 G3 and 1 G4) and nausea (1 G3). There were 2 instances of G1 vaginal bleeding. There was no impact of MIFE on eribulin PK. Efficacy: There were 23 evaluable pts with TNBC across Parts 1 and 2 treated at the RP2D: 21 GR+, 2 GR status unknown; median of 3 prior chemotherapy regimens; 1 patient had received prior eribulin. Responses were: 3 PR, 8 SD, 11 PD and one too early to assess. Median PFS was 9 weeks. Conclusions: MIFE plus eribulin was well tolerated and appears to be an active treatment regimen. Five TNBC patients had a PFS longer than the upper 95% CI for PFS (i.e., >15 wks) reported by Aogi et al. for TNBC treated with eribulin (Annals of Oncology 2012?23:144148). Clinical trial information: NCT02014337.
Citation Format: Han HS, Wilks S, Paplomata E, Modiano MR, Becerra C, Braiteh FS, Spira AI, Pluard TJ, Richards DA, Conzen SD, Baker G, Fishman RS, Marcantonio A, O'Shaughnessy J, Nanda R. Efficacy results of a phase 1/2 study of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist mifepristone (MIFE) in combination with eribulin in GR-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-12-15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HS Han
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - S Wilks
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - E Paplomata
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - MR Modiano
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - C Becerra
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - FS Braiteh
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - AI Spira
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - TJ Pluard
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - DA Richards
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - SD Conzen
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - G Baker
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - RS Fishman
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - A Marcantonio
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| | - R Nanda
- Texas Oncology San Antonio; ACRC/Arizona Clinical Research Center and Arizona Oncology; Virginia Cancer Specialists Research Institute; Texas Oncology - Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center; Moffitt Cancer Center; The US Oncology Network/Mckesson Specialty Health; Emory University Winship Cancer Institute Midtown; Saint Luke's Cancer Institute; Tyler Cancer Center, US Oncology Research; Baylor University Medical Center Texas Oncology US Oncology, Dallas, TX; Corcept Therapeutics, Inc; University of Chicago Medical Center; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Park YH, Im SA, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Chae YS, Lee KH, Kim JH, Im YH, Ahn JS, Kim TY, Lee KH, Kim SB, Ahn JH, Kim GM, Park IH, Lee SJ, Han HS, Kim SH, Jung KH. Abstract OT1-01-12: A phase II, multicenter, randomized trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine (EG) vs. paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PG) in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer as first-line chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-ot1-01-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an incurable disease and is needed to improve effective chemotherapy. Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine (PG) combination chemotherapy is one of the preferred chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with MBC, and was found to be proper as a maintenance chemotherapy regimen with survival benefit and feasible toxicity profile. Eribulin mesylate is a non-taxane inhibitor of microtubule dynamics of the halichondrin class of antineoplastic drugs. A recent pooled analysis of two phase II studies with eribulin showed improved overall survival in in various patient subgroups with advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had previously received an anthracycline and a taxane. Furthermore, eribulin may have rational benefit compared with paclitaxel in terms of neurotoxicity. Therefore, Eribulin plus Gemcitabine (EG) combination chemotherapy may have less neurotoxocity comparing to PG.
Trial Design: Prospective randomized phase 2, open-label, two-arm, multi-center study comparing EG chemotherapy with PG chemotherapy for patients with HER-2 negative MBC as first-line chemotherapy.
Eligibility Criteria: Histologically confirmed breast cancer patients, at least 19 years of age, with no prior history of chemotherapy for metastatic, recurrent breast cancer with evaluable lesions (as per RECIST, 1.1) who have adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. Patients either may or may not have a prior anthracycline containing regimen. Prior hormonal therapy as a treatment of metastatic disease is allowed.
Specific Aims:
The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial is Progression-Free Survival (PFS). The secondary efficacy endpoints are: Time to Treatment Failure (TTF); Overall Survival (OS); neuropathic scale (FACT for Taxane QOL assessment); toxicity; duration of response; Objective Response Rate (ORR); Clinical Benefit Rate. The exploratory endpoint of the study includes pharmacogenetic profile.
Statistical Methods:
The initial sample size of the present study was determined based on the data derived from a previous trial on PG maintenance chemotherapy design; 6-month PFS is 70% for PG chemotherapy. This design was hypothesized that EG chemotherapy would not be inferior to PG chemotherapy. Thus, estimated PFS for each arm is 70%. Based on this estimate, we would plan to recruit a total of 100 patients (50 per arm). Considering drop-out rate of 10%, total 112 MBC patients planned to be enrolled.
Present Accrual and Target Accrual:Enrollment has been completed as of March, 2016 with a target enrollment of 112 patients.
Contact information:Kyung Hae Jung MD, Ph.D. khjung@amc.seoul.kr
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02263495.
Citation Format: Park YH, Im S-A, Sohn JH, Lee KS, Chae YS, Lee KH, Kim J-H, Im Y-H, Ahn JS, Kim T-Y, Lee K-H, Kim S-B, Ahn J-H, Kim GM, Park IH, Lee SJ, Han HS, Kim SH, Jung KH. A phase II, multicenter, randomized trial of eribulin plus gemcitabine (EG) vs. paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PG) in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer as first-line chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- YH Park
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - S-A Im
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - JH Sohn
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - KS Lee
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - YS Chae
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - KH Lee
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - J-H Kim
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - Y-H Im
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - JS Ahn
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - T-Y Kim
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - K-H Lee
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - S-B Kim
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - J-H Ahn
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - GM Kim
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - IH Park
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - SJ Lee
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - HS Han
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - SH Kim
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| | - KH Jung
- Samsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Yonsei Cancer Center; National Cancer Center; Kyungpook National University Medical Center; Chungbuk National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital; Asan Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Diéras V, Han HS, Robson ME, Palácová M, Marcom PK, Jager A, Bondarenko I, Citrin D, Campone M, Telli ML, Domchek SM, Friedlander M, Kaufman B, Ratajczak C, Coates A, Bonnet P, Qin Q, Qian J, Giranda VL, Shepherd SP, Puhalla S, Isakoff SJ. Abstract P4-22-02: Evaluation of veliparib (V) and temozolomide (TMZ) in a phase 2 randomized study of the efficacy and tolerability of V+TMZ or carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) vs placebo (Plc)+C/P in patients (pts) with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p4-22-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: V is a potent, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that obstructs DNA damage repair. BRCA1/2 tumors are defective in homologous recombination, which leads to more error-prone mechanisms of DNA repair and increased sensitivity to PARP inhibition. V enhances the antitumor activity of alkylating agents such as TMZ in preclinical models. In addition, V+TMZ showed promising activity in a single-arm phase 2 study in pts with BRCA1/2 mutations. This phase 2 trial (NCT01506609) investigated the efficacy and tolerability of V+TMZ (or V+C/P) compared to Plc+C/P in pts with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Results from the primary analysis for the V+TMZ arm vs Plc+C/P are presented, and the V+C/P vs Plc+C/P results will be presented separately.
Methods: Male and female pts aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were randomized 1:1:1 to: 1) V 40 mg BID D1–7 + TMZ 150–200 mg/m2 QD D1–5, 28-D cycle; 2) V 120 mg BID D1–7 + C AUC 6, D3 and P 175 mg/m2, D3, 21-D cycle; 3) placebo BID D1–7 + C/P. Key eligibility criteria included known deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation, ≤2 prior chemotherapies for metastatic disease, no prior platinum agent, and no CNS metastases. Randomization was stratified by hormone receptor status, prior cytotoxic therapy (yes vs no), and ECOG PS (0–1 vs 2). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 by independent review. Overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety/tolerability were also evaluated.
Results: A total of 290 pts (284 BRCA+ per central lab) were randomized (V+TMZ, n=94 [91 BRCA+]). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were comparable among treatment arms; 41.3% of pts had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and 31.7% had received >2 prior regimens. Median study drug exposure was 6 cycles for the V+TMZ arm and 10 cycles for the Plc+C/P arm. Median PFS, median OS (interim), and ORR for V+TMZ were inferior to Plc+C/P (PFS 7.4 vs 12.3 mo, OS 19.1 vs 25.0 mo, and ORR 28.6% vs 61.3%). In pts with TNBC, median PFS was 5.5 (3.1–8.5) mo; 8.4 (6.8–10.6) mo for pts with non-TNBC. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of interest occurring differentially with V+TMZ are shown in Table 1. Grade ≥3 AEs in ≥30% of pts in the V+TMZ arm were thrombocytopenia (48%) and neutropenia (37%).
Conclusions: V+TMZ provided durable responses, with less neutropenia, alopecia, and neuropathy than Plc+C/P; however, PFS, OS, and ORR were inferior in the TMZ arm compared to C/P.
Table 1Treatment-Emergent AEs, n (%)V+TMZ, n=93Plc+C/P, n=96Neutropenia46 (50)71 (74)Alopecia10 (11)55 (57)Peripheral neuropathy11 (12)56 (58)Thrombocytopenia73 (79)67 (70)Nausea70 (75)56 (58)
Citation Format: Diéras V, Han HS, Robson ME, Palácová M, Marcom PK, Jager A, Bondarenko I, Citrin D, Campone M, Telli ML, Domchek SM, Friedlander M, Kaufman B, Ratajczak C, Coates A, Bonnet P, Qin Q, Qian J, Giranda VL, Shepherd SP, Puhalla S, Isakoff SJ. Evaluation of veliparib (V) and temozolomide (TMZ) in a phase 2 randomized study of the efficacy and tolerability of V+TMZ or carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) vs placebo (Plc)+C/P in patients (pts) with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-22-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Diéras
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - HS Han
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - ME Robson
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - M Palácová
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - PK Marcom
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - A Jager
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - I Bondarenko
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - D Citrin
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - M Campone
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - ML Telli
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - SM Domchek
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - M Friedlander
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - B Kaufman
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - C Ratajczak
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - A Coates
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - P Bonnet
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Q Qin
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - J Qian
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - VL Giranda
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - SP Shepherd
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - S Puhalla
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - SJ Isakoff
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Masarykův Onkologický ústav, Brno, Czech Republic; Duke University, Durham, NC; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Dnepropetrovsk City Hospital, Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine; Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Zion, IL; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; AbbVie, Inc, Chicago, IL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Knee pain is one of the most common symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA) that affects the quality of life in the older adults, and identifying the contributing factors of knee pain is important. We hypothesized that higher fruit and vegetable consumption might be associated with the severity of knee pain lower prevalence of severe knee pain by affecting pain perception in the knee joint. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between self-reported knee pain and the consumption of fruits vegetables, carotenoids and vitamin C and self-reported knee pain. DESIGN Nationally representative cross sectional study. SETTING 2010-2011 rounds of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PARTICIPANTS A total of 6588 subjects aged ≥50 years were participated. METHODS Severity of knee pain was estimated using a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Daily intake of fruits, vegetables, and vitamins were estimated using data from 24-hour recalls and food frequency questionnaires. RESULTS The NRS scores of knee pain decreased significantly with increasing fruit and vegetable intake quartiles. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the fourth quartile of vegetable and fruit consumption was associated with decreased prevalence of severe knee pain (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48-0.73) compared with first quartile of vegetable and fruit consumption; however, carotenoids and vitamin C consumption was not associated with the severity of knee pain. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, severe knee pain was independently associated with fruit and vegetable consumption. Our findings suggest that intake of whole fruits and vegetables may help improve knee pain in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Han
- Jee-Yon Lee, M.D. Department of Family Medicine, CHA University College of Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Chaum Life Center, 335 Pangyo-ro, Bundang-gu, Sungnam-si, Republic of Korea, Tel.: 82-31-881-7596, FAX: 82-2-362-2473, E-mail address:
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|