Treatment with a fixed dose combination for cardiovascular disease-more than a health benefit?

Background

Despite the proven benefits of cardiovascular disease medication, adherence to treatment remains poor. Fixed-dose combinations (FDC) have been proposed as a measure to enhance adherence.

Objective

To assess compliance to treatment with an FDC, consisting of acetylsalicylic acid, atorvastatin and ramipril, and to gauge its impact on cardiovascular risk factors.

Methods

This was a prospective, multicenter, observational, phase 4 study conducted for 6 months in Greece. 1444 participants (67% males, mean age 63.7 years old) that were prescribed the FDC for primary or secondary prevention were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed to analyze clinical, sociodemographic and safety parameters.

Results

Approximately equal number of participants was recruited in the primary and secondary prevention group. The majority of patients were overweight and hypertensive. Dosing compliance was 88.6% at 3 months and 86.8% at 6 months. Adherence to treatment was 99.1% at 3 months and 97.6% at 6 months. Statistically significant changes at 6 months compared to baseline were documented in systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 15.7/7.5 mmHg and LDL-c of 32.6 mg/dl, in both CVD and non-CVD participants and in total population as well. The total 10-year risk for CV events was reduced by 34.1% at 6 months. Only 1.2% of the participants reported an adverse event and 0.8% an adverse event reaction.

Conclusions

Among patients with or without CVD, the use of acetylsalicylic acid, atorvastatin and ramipril FDC resulted in good medication adherence at 6 months and statistically significant improvements in blood pressure, total cholesterol and LDL levels.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Galenica SA

Hospital attendance and admission trends for cardiac diseases during the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown in Greece

Objectives

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, along with implementation of lockdown and strict public movement restrictions, in Greece has affected hospital visits and admissions. We aimed to investigate trends of cardiac disease admissions during the outbreak of the pandemic and possible associations with the applied restrictive measures.

Study design

This is a retrospective observational study.

Methods

Data for 4970 patients admitted via the cardiology emergency department (ED) across 3 large-volume urban hospitals in Athens and 2 regional/rural hospitals from February 3, 2020, up to April 12 were recorded. Data from the equivalent (for the COVID-19 outbreak) time period of 2019 and from the postlockdown time period were also collected.

Results

A falling trend of cardiology ED visits and hospital admissions was observed starting from the week when the restrictive measures due to COVID-19 were implemented. Compared with the pre–COVID-19 outbreak time period, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [145 (29/week) vs. 60 (12/week), −59%, P < 0.001], ST elevation myocardial infarction [46 (9.2/week) vs. 21 (4.2/week), −54%, P = 0.002], and non-ST elevation ACS [99 cases (19.8/week) vs. 39 (7.8/week), −60% P < 0.001] were reduced at the COVID-19 outbreak time period. Reductions were also noted for heart failure worsening and arrhythmias. The ED visits in the postlockdown period were significantly higher than in the COVID-19 outbreak time period (1511 vs 660; P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our data show significant drops in cardiology visits and admissions during the COVID-19 outbreak time period. Whether this results from restrictive measures or depicts a true reduction of cardiac disease cases warrants further investigation.

•

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has led to an unprecedented health system overload.

•

The restrictive measures in Greece resulted in a low number of COVID-19 cases.

•

Hospital visits and cardiovascular events have diminished after implementation of restrictive measures.

•

Acute coronary syndromes reduced by approximately 55%, despite limited incidence of COVID-19.

•

The multifactorial etiology of this finding should be thoroughly investigated.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for distal coronary graft anastomosis le-sions: a case series

BACKGROUND

Management of coronary artery graft failure, especially at the site of a recent distal anastomosis, is a challenging clinical situation, and literature data are scarce.

CASE SERIES

We present a case series of patients with coronary artery bypass graft failure up to six months after surgical revascularization, who were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention at the site of distal graft anastomosis through the graft or the native vessel.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous coronary intervention at distal graft anastomotic lesions is challenging, it can be performed from either the graft or the native vessel, and the angiographic result may not always be optimal. HIPPOKRATIA 2019, 23(2): 87-91.