1
|
McCullagh IJ, Salas B, Teodorczuk A, Callaghan M. Modifiable risk factors for post-operative delirium in older adults undergoing major non-cardiac elective surgery: a multi-centre, trainee delivered observational cohort feasibility study and trainee survey. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:436. [PMID: 37454100 PMCID: PMC10349417 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04122-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-operative delirium (POD) is an acute brain failure which may occur following major surgery, with serious implications for participants and caregivers. Evidence regarding optimal anaesthetic management for older participants at higher risk of POD is conflicting. We conducted a feasibility study of our protocol in 5 centres to guide sample size estimation and inform future recruitment strategies for a larger cohort study. METHODS Participants aged over 65 and scheduled for major surgery were recruited. They were assessed pre-operatively for delirium, cognitive impairment, depression, comorbidity, activity levels and alcohol use. Details of management during surgery, all medications and complications were recorded by a trainee-led research team. Participants were assessed for delirium in the immediate recovery period and then on post-operative days 1-4 using the 4 question attention test (4AT) with complications assessed at day 4 using the post-operative morbidity survey (POMS). Primary outcomes were the incident rates of POD. Secondary outcomes were number of eligible patients, recruitment rates and retention rates throughout the study, time required for data collection, preoperative risk factors assessment and daily postoperative delirium assessments. Also to assess the added value of employing the regional trainee research network (INCARNNET) to deliver the study. Specifically, what proportion of patient consent, data collection and post-operative testing is performed by anaesthesia trainees from this group, especially the success of weekend delirium assessment by trainees? A survey was completed at the end of the study by the trainees involved regarding their involvement in the study. RESULTS Ninety-five participants were recruited, of whom 93 completed the study. Overall, POD occurred in 9 patients. Of these, three were detected in recovery and six on post-op days 1-4. Median length of stay was 6 days. Recruitment rates were high in all but one site. 59 (62%) participants were consented by trainees and 189 (63%) of post op delirium assessments were performed by trainees. A total of six patients declined the study (in a follow up survey of trainees). Pre-existing cognitive impairment, depression and problem drinking were detected in 4(4.3%), 3(3.2%) and 5(5.37%) participants, respectively. Co-morbidity was common with 55(59%) in class three or four of the geriatric index of morbidity. Overall, from a total of 641 data points, levels of missing data were as follows, site A = 9.3%, B = 13.5%, C = 15.4%, D = 10.9%, E = 11.1% (data could not be completed retrospectively). CONCLUSIONS A multi-centre observational cohort study of delirium carried out by UK trainee anaesthetists is feasible. Patients are content to undergo day of surgery consent and multiple short questionnaires pre-operatively. Proposed data, especially pharmacological, should be carefully considered for their relevance to modifiable mechanisms that can lead to POD. Future research to enable prognostic modelling of POD should involve large scale cohort studies of enriched populations to capture a higher POD incidence. POD remains a common complication in older persons undergoing major surgery in the UK and studies of interventions are urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The study was retrospectively registered with ISRCTN94663125 on 07/02/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain J McCullagh
- Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Barbara Salas
- Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Teodorczuk
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Metro North Mental Health, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mark Callaghan
- Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scott J, Trevi L, McNeil H, Ewen T, Mawson P, McDonald D, Filby A, Lall R, Booth K, Boschman G, Melkebeek V, Perkins G, McMullan R, McAuley DF, McCullagh IJ, Walsh T, Rostron A, Shankar-Hari M, Dark P, Simpson AJ, Conway Morris A, Hellyer TP. Role of immunosuppression in an antibiotic stewardship intervention and its association with clinical outcomes and antibiotic use: protocol for an observational study (RISC-sepsis). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e068321. [PMID: 36600326 PMCID: PMC9743405 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sepsis is characterised by a dysregulated immune response to infection, with exaggerated pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses. A predominant immunosuppressive profile affecting both innate and adaptive immune responses is associated with increased hospital-acquired infection and reduced infection-free survival. While hospital-acquired infection leads to additional antibiotic use, the role of the immunosuppressive phenotype in guiding complex decisions, such as those affecting antibiotic stewardship, is uncertain. This study is a mechanistic substudy embedded within a multicentre clinical and cost-effectiveness trial of biomarker-guided antibiotic stewardship. This mechanistic study aims to determine the effect of sepsis-associated immunosuppression on the trial outcome measures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS RISC-sepsis is a prospective, multicentre, exploratory, observational study embedded within the ADAPT-sepsis trial. A subgroup of 180 participants with antibiotics commenced for suspected sepsis, enrolled in the ADAPT-sepsis trial, will be recruited. Blood samples will be collected on alternate days until day 7. At each time point, blood will be collected for flow cytometric analysis into cell preservation tubes. Immunophenotyping will be performed at a central testing hub by flow cytometry. The primary outcome measures are monocyte human leucocyte antigen-DR; neutrophil CD88; programmed cell death-1 on monocytes, neutrophils and T lymphocytes and the percentage of regulatory T cells. Secondary outcome measures will link to trial outcomes from the ADAPT-sepsis trial including antibiotic days; occurrence of hospital-acquired infection and length of ICU-stay and hospital-stay. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been granted (IRAS 209815) and RISC-sepsis is registered with the ISRCTN (86837685). Study results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications, presentations at scientific meetings and via patient and public participation groups and social media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Scott
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Loredana Trevi
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Hannah McNeil
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Tom Ewen
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Phil Mawson
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David McDonald
- Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Filby
- Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ranjit Lall
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Katie Booth
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | - Gavin Perkins
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Critical Care Department, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ronan McMullan
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Daniel F McAuley
- Wellcome Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Regional Intensive Care Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Iain J McCullagh
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Timothy Walsh
- Intensive Care Unit, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK
- The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anthony Rostron
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Integrated Critical Care Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Manu Shankar-Hari
- Intensive Care Unit, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK
- The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paul Dark
- Division of Immunology, University of Manchester, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK
- Critical Care Department, Salford Care Organisation, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - A John Simpson
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Conway Morris
- JVF Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Division of Immunology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas P Hellyer
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McCullagh IJ, Begum S, Patel A, Gillies MA. Perioperative blood transfusion in major abdominal cancer surgery: a multi-centre service evaluation and national survey. BJA Open 2022; 3:100032. [PMID: 37588576 PMCID: PMC10430868 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Background Anaemia is associated with complications and death after surgery. Perioperative red-cell transfusion triggers are not well defined in patients having oncological surgery, or with cardiovascular disease. Methods We carried out a prospective multicentre cohort study and a clinician survey of UK transfusion practice in adult patients undergoing surgery for abdominal malignancy. The primary outcome was red cell transfusion. Secondary outcomes were transfusion trigger haemoglobin, incidence of complications, length of hospital stay, and acute hospital mortality. Results In this prospective cohort study, data were collected on 412 patients undergoing surgery for intrabdominal malignancy in 14 NHS hospitals. Twenty-two (5.2%) patients received preoperative, 42 (10.2%) intraoperative, and 52 (12.2%) postoperative red blood cell transfusion. The mean postoperative transfusion trigger was 75.3 g L-1, and the mean number of units of red blood cells transfused was 1.5 (standard deviation, 1.1). Seventeen (4.0%) patients had a documented postoperative troponin elevation. Five (1.2%) patients died within 30 days of surgery. In the survey, 117 clinicians submitted complete responses, of whom 62 (53%) indicated that a transfusion threshold of 70 g L-1 was appropriate: however, this decreased to six (5.1%) if there was evidence of recent cardiac ischaemia. There were 100 (86%) respondents who indicated equipoise for a trial of restrictive vs liberal transfusion, decreasing to 56% if there was coexisting cardiovascular disease. Conclusions Many patients having oncological surgery receive red cell transfusion, the majority being given postoperatively. Restrictive transfusion practice is generally followed; however, variability exists especially in cardiovascular disease. Equipoise exists for a study of transfusion thresholds in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Salma Begum
- The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Euden J, Howard P, Powell N, Llewelyn MJ, Szakmany T, Albur M, Bond SE, Brookes-Howell L, Dark P, Hellyer TP, Hopkins S, McCullagh IJ, Ogden M, Pallmann P, Parsons H, Partridge DG, Shaw DE, Shinkins B, Todd S, Thomas-Jones E, West R, Carrol ED, Sandoe JAT. P14 Procalcitonin evaluation of antibiotic use in COVID-19 hospitalized patients during the first wave of COVID-19: the PEACH study. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2022. [PMCID: PMC9040064 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac004.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A minority of patients presenting to hospital with COVID-19 have bacterial coinfection. Procalcitonin testing may help identify patients for whom antibiotics should be prescribed or withheld. The PEACH study describes the use of procalcitonin in English and Welsh hospitals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic to help diagnose bacterial infections and guide antibiotic treatment. There is a lack of clear evidence to support its use in lung infections, which means in some hospitals, clinicians have used the procalcitonin test to guide antibiotic decisions in COVID-19, whilst in other hospitals, they have not. Our study is analysing data from hospitals that did and did not use procalcitonin testing during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. It will determine whether and how procalcitonin testing should be used in the NHS in future waves of COVID-19 to protect patients from antibiotic overuse. Methods To assess whether the use of PCT testing, to guide antibiotic prescribing, safely reduced antibiotic use among patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic, we are answering this question through three different, and complimentary, work streams (WS), each with discrete work packages (WP): (i) Work Stream 1: utilization of PCT testing to guide antibiotic prescribing during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic; (ii) Work Stream 2: patient-level impact of PCT testing on antibiotic exposure and clinical outcome (main work stream currently in analysis); and (iii) Work Stream 3: health economics analysis of PCT testing to guide antibiotics in COVID-19. Results Our first publication from Work Stream 1 (Antibiotics 2021, 10: 516) used a web-based survey to gather data from antimicrobial leads about the use of procalcitonin testing. Responses were received from 148/151 (98%) eligible hospitals. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was widespread introduction and expansion of PCT use in NHS hospitals. The number of hospitals using PCT in emergency/acute admissions rose from 17 (11%) to 74/146 (50.7%) and use in ICU increased from 70 (47.6%) to 124/147 (84.4%). This increase happened predominantly in March and April 2020, preceding NICE guidance. Approximately half of hospitals used PCT as a single test to guide decisions to discontinue antibiotics and half used repeated measurements. There was marked variation in the thresholds used for empirical antibiotic cessation and guidance about interpretation of values. Conclusions Procalcitonin testing has been widely adopted in the NHS during the COVID-19 pandemic in an unevidenced, heterogeneous way and in conflict with relevant NICE guidance. Further research is needed urgently that assesses the impact of this change on antibiotic prescribing and patient safety. Work Stream 2 is ongoing, and results will be published once available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Euden
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | | | - Tamas Szakmany
- The Grange University Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, UK
| | | | | | | | - Paul Dark
- Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Thomas P. Hellyer
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Iain J. McCullagh
- The Newcastle upon Tyne hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - Helena Parsons
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Dominick E. Shaw
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Bethany Shinkins
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Stacy Todd
- Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Robert West
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Enitan D. Carrol
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boxell EG, Malik Y, Wong J, Lee MH, Berntsson HM, Lee MJ, Bourne RS, McCullagh IJ, Hind D, Wilson MJ. Are treatment effects consistent with hypothesized mechanisms of action proposed for postoperative delirium interventions? Reanalysis of systematic reviews. J Comp Eff Res 2021; 10:1301-1315. [PMID: 34585622 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2021-0161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Postoperative delirium (POD) is associated with increased morbidity and is poorly understood. The aim of this review was to identify putative mechanisms through re-analysis of randomized trials on treatment or prevention of POD. Materials & methods: A systematic review was performed to identify systematic reviews of treatments for POD. Constituent randomized controlled trials were identified, and interventions were grouped according to hypothesized mechanisms of action. Effects were meta-analyzed by hypothesized mechanism and timing of intervention. Results: A total of 116 randomized controlled trials described 47 individual interventions for POD, with nine mechanisms identified. The largest effects were observed for postoperative inflammation reduction, and preoperative reinforcement of sleep-wake cycle. Conclusion: This approach identifies treatments focused on mechanisms of action that may be front runners for future trials and interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily G Boxell
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Yuhaniz Malik
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Jeyinn Wong
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Min Hyung Lee
- The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Hannah M Berntsson
- School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Matthew J Lee
- Department of Oncology & Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.,Academic Directorate of General Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
| | - Richard S Bourne
- Department of Pharmacy, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK
| | - Iain J McCullagh
- Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Matthew J Wilson
- School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Powell N, Howard P, Llewelyn MJ, Szakmany T, Albur M, Bond SE, Euden J, Brookes-Howell L, Dark P, Hellyer TP, Hopkins S, McCullagh IJ, Ogden M, Pallmann P, Parsons H, Partridge DG, Shaw DE, Shinkins B, Todd S, Thomas-Jones E, West R, Carrol ED, Sandoe JAT. Use of Procalcitonin during the First Wave of COVID-19 in the Acute NHS Hospitals: A Retrospective Observational Study. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:516. [PMID: 34062898 PMCID: PMC8147337 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10050516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
A minority of patients presenting to hospital with COVID-19 have bacterial co-infection. Procalcitonin testing may help identify patients for whom antibiotics should be prescribed or withheld. This study describes the use of procalcitonin in English and Welsh hospitals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A web-based survey of antimicrobial leads gathered data about the use of procalcitonin testing. Responses were received from 148/151 (98%) eligible hospitals. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was widespread introduction and expansion of PCT use in NHS hospitals. The number of hospitals using PCT in emergency/acute admissions rose from 17 (11%) to 74/146 (50.7%) and use in Intensive Care Units (ICU) increased from 70 (47.6%) to 124/147 (84.4%). This increase happened predominantly in March and April 2020, preceding NICE guidance. Approximately half of hospitals used PCT as a single test to guide decisions to discontinue antibiotics and half used repeated measurements. There was marked variation in the thresholds used for empiric antibiotic cessation and guidance about interpretation of values. Procalcitonin testing has been widely adopted in the NHS during the COVID-19 pandemic in an unevidenced, heterogeneous way and in conflict with relevant NICE guidance. Further research is needed urgently that assesses the impact of this change on antibiotic prescribing and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Powell
- Pharmacy Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust, Truro TR1 3LJ, UK
| | - Philip Howard
- School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK;
- Department of Medicines Management and Pharmacy, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK
| | - Martin J. Llewelyn
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9PS, UK;
| | - Tamas Szakmany
- Grange University Hospital, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Llanyravon, Cwmbran NP44 2XJ, UK;
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK
| | | | - Stuart E Bond
- Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield WF1 4DG, UK;
- School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD13DH, UK
| | - Joanne Euden
- Centre for Trials Research, Neuadd Meirionydd, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK; (J.E.); (L.B.-H.); (P.P.); (E.T.-J.)
| | - Lucy Brookes-Howell
- Centre for Trials Research, Neuadd Meirionydd, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK; (J.E.); (L.B.-H.); (P.P.); (E.T.-J.)
| | - Paul Dark
- Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK;
| | - Thomas P Hellyer
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK;
| | | | - Iain J McCullagh
- The Newcastle upon Tyne hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK;
| | - Margaret Ogden
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, NIHR, London SW1A 2NS, UK;
| | - Philip Pallmann
- Centre for Trials Research, Neuadd Meirionydd, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK; (J.E.); (L.B.-H.); (P.P.); (E.T.-J.)
| | - Helena Parsons
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK; (H.P.); (D.GP.)
| | - David G Partridge
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK; (H.P.); (D.GP.)
| | - Dominick E. Shaw
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK;
| | - Bethany Shinkins
- Test Evaluation Group, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK;
| | - Stacy Todd
- Liverpool University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK;
| | - Emma Thomas-Jones
- Centre for Trials Research, Neuadd Meirionydd, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK; (J.E.); (L.B.-H.); (P.P.); (E.T.-J.)
| | - Robert West
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9TJ, UK;
| | - Enitan D Carrol
- Department of Clinical Infection Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK;
| | - Jonathan A. T. Sandoe
- Healthcare Associated Infection Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Richardson A, Peart J, Wright SE, McCullagh IJ. Reducing the incidence of pressure ulcers in critical care units: a 4-year quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2018; 29:433-439. [PMID: 28398589 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Quality problem Critical care patients often have several risk factors for pressure ulceration and implementing prevention interventions have been shown to decrease risk. Initial assessment We identified a high incidence of pressure ulcers in the four adult critical care units in our organization. Therefore, avoiding pressure ulceration was an important quality priority. Choice of solution We undertook a quality improvement programme aimed at reducing the incidence of pressure ulceration using an evidence-based bundle approach. Implementation A bundle of technical and non-technical interventions were implemented supported by clinical leadership on each unit. Important components were evidence appraisals; changes to mattresses; focussed risk assessment alongside mandating patients at very high risk to be repositioned two hourly; and staff training to increase awareness of how to prevent pressure ulcers. Evaluation Pressure ulcer numbers, incidence and categories were collected continuously and monitored monthly by unit staff. Pressure ulcer rates reduced significantly from 8.08/100 patient admissions to 2.97/100 patient admissions, an overall relative rate reduction of 63% over 4 years. The greatest reduction was seen in the most severe category of pressure ulceration. The average estimated cost saving was £2.6 million (range £2.1-£3.1). Lessons learned A quality improvement programme including technical and non-technical interventions, data feedback to staff and clinical leadership was associated with a sustained reduction in the incidence of pressure ulceration in the critically ill. Strategies used in this programme may be transferable to other critical care units to bring more widespread patient benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Richardson
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Joanna Peart
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen E Wright
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Iain J McCullagh
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Burry L, Rose L, McCullagh IJ, Fergusson DA, Ferguson ND, Mehta S. Daily sedation interruption versus no daily sedation interruption for critically ill adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD009176. [PMID: 25005604 PMCID: PMC6517142 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009176.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Daily sedation interruption (DSI) is thought to limit drug bioaccumulation, promote a more awake state, and thereby reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation. Available evidence has shown DSI to either reduce, not alter, or prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to compare the total duration of invasive mechanical ventilation for critically ill adult patients requiring intravenous sedation who were managed with DSI versus those with no DSI. Our other objectives were to determine whether DSI influenced mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, adverse events, the total doses of sedative drug administered, and quality of life. SEARCH METHODS We searched, from database inception to February 2014, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 1); MEDLINE (OvidSP); EMBASE (OvidSP); CINAHL (EBSCOhost); Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS); Web of Science Science Citation Index; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE); the Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA Database); trial registration websites, and reference lists of relevant articles. We did not apply language restrictions. The reference lists of all retrieved articles were reviewed for additional, potentially relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials that compared DSI with sedation strategies that did not include DSI in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently extracted data and three authors assessed risk of bias. We contacted study authors for additional information as required. We combined data in forest plots using random-effects modelling. A priori subgroups and sensitivity analyses were performed. MAIN RESULTS Nine trials were used in the analysis (n = 1282 patients). These trials were found to be predominantly at low risk of bias. We did not find strong evidence of an effect of DSI on the total duration of ventilation. Pooled data from nine trials demonstrated a 13% reduction in the geometric mean, with relatively wide confidence intervals (CI) indicating imprecision (95% CI 26% reduction to 2% increase, moderate quality evidence). Similarly, we did not find strong evidence of an effect on ICU length of stay (-10%, 95% CI -20% to 3%, n = 9 trials, moderate quality evidence) or hospital length of stay (-6%, 95% CI -18% to 8%, n = 8 trials, moderate quality evidence). Heterogeneity for these three outcomes was moderate and statistically significant. The risk ratio for ICU mortality was 0.96 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.21, n = 7 trials, moderate quality evidence), for rate of accidental endotracheal tube removal 1.07 (95% CI 0.55 to 2.12, n = 6 trials, moderate quality evidence), for catheter removal 1.48 (95% CI 0.76 to 2.90, n = 4 trials), and for incidence of new onset delirium 1.02 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.13, n = 3 trials, moderate quality evidence). Differences in the doses of any drug used or quality of life score (Short Form (SF)-36) did not reach statistical significance. Tracheostomy was performed less frequently in the DSI group (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.92, n = 6 trials, moderate quality evidence). Sensitivity analysis of unlogged data resulted in similar findings. Post hoc analysis to further explain heterogeneity, based on study country of origin, showed that studies conducted in North America resulted in a reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation (-21%, 95% CI -33% to -5%, n = 5 trials). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We have not found strong evidence that DSI alters the duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality, length of ICU or hospital stay, adverse event rates, drug consumption, or quality of life for critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation compared to sedation strategies that do not include DSI. We advise that caution should be applied when interpreting and applying the findings as the overall effect of treatment is always < 1 and the upper limit of the CI is only marginally higher than the no-effect line. These results should be considered unstable rather than negative for DSI given the statistical and clinical heterogeneity identified in the included trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Burry
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of TorontoDepartment of Pharmacy600 University Avenue, Room 18‐377TorontoONCanadaM5G 1X5
| | - Louise Rose
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Sunnybrook Research InstituteDepartment of Critical Care MedicineTorontoCanada
| | - Iain J McCullagh
- Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of NewcastleDepartment of Perioperative and Critical Care Medicine, Freeman HospitalFreeman RdHigh HeatonNewcastle upon TyneTyne and WearUKNE7 7DN
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteClinical Epidemiology Program501 Smyth RoadOttawaONCanadaK1H 8L6
| | - Niall D Ferguson
- University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, University of TorontoInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine600 University AveSuite 18‐206TorontoONCanadaM5G 1X5
| | - Sangeeta Mehta
- Mount Sinai Hospital, University of TorontoInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine600 University Ave, Rm 1504TorontoONCanadaM5G 1X5
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
McCullagh IJ, Scales DC. Highlights from the Critical Care Canada Forum 2009 - 25 to 28 October 2009, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Crit Care 2010. [PMCID: PMC2875497 DOI: 10.1186/cc8221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
10
|
Wilcox ME, McCullagh IJ, Scales DC. Critical Care Canada Forum 2008, 11-13 November 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Crit Care 2009; 13:301. [PMID: 19226442 PMCID: PMC2688107 DOI: 10.1186/cc7683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Elizabeth Wilcox
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|