The Use of Advanced Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography During Simple and Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repairs

OBJECTIVES

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) success depends on imaging technology both in the planning and operative phases. Endovascular repair requires intravenous contrast and radiation exposure to the patient as well as radiation exposure to the operator. Recent developments in imaging technology attempt to merge preoperative imaging with intraoperative imaging to improve the efficiency and accuracy of EVAR. The Cydar 3D imaging system combines the preoperative and intraoperative imaging during the operation. We aim to investigate the use of the Cydar 3D imaging system during EVAR compared to conventional methods.

METHOD

Retrospective review of all patients undergoing an EVAR at a single quaternary vascular center from 2019-2023 was collected. This cohort was divided into two groups: (1) Repair using Cydar 3D imaging or (2) Repair without Cydar 3D imaging. Overall, 138 unique patients were identified with 27 operations using Cydar 3D imaging and 111 operations without Cydar 3D imaging. We performed a 1-to-1 propensity score - matched analysis using nearest-neighbor matching for variables including age, case urgency, and if the case was performed in the operative room or interventional radiology room. A match occurred when a patient in the Cydar 3D imaging group had an estimated score within 0.01 standard deviations of a patient in the control group. From this we paired 27 from each cohort for a total of 54 patients. Demographic data included length of stay (LOS) in days, contrast volume (ml), Fluoroscopy time (min), procedure length (mins), mortality, blood loss (ml). Univariate analyses were performed and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 54 vascular patients were analyzed: 27 without the Cydar 3D imaging and 27 with the Cydar 3D imaging. In the univariate analysis there was no statistical difference in the average length of stay (6.4 days ± 11.76 vs. 4.1 ± 6.03, p = 0.372), aneurysm size (5.9 ± 1.4 vs. 5.9 ± 1.2, p=0.88), contrast volume in mL (91.3 ± 47.0 vs. 91.1-33.49, p=9.88), fluoroscopy time in mins (20.2±17.2 vs. 19.5±19.4, p=0.89) , procedure length (299.3±177.9 vs. 353±191.98, p=0.279), blood loss in mL (513.8±791 vs. 353±191.98, p=0.594). There was an increase in reintervention for endoleaks in the group with use of Cydar 3D imaging (0 vs 6, p=0.043). A sub-analysis of patients undergoing physician modified EVARs did show a 15% reduction in the contrast volume used.

CONCLUSION

The use of 3D imaging technology has the potential to increase the safety of EVAR to both patients and operators. In our study we did not find any difference in standard EVARs however there was a contrast use decrease in physician modified EVARs. Further studies will need to be performed to determine the realized benefit from performing EVARs using this new technology.

Use of the GORE Conformable Excluder Device in Highly Angulated Aortic Neck Anatomy: Mid-term Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Patients with complex aortic anatomy require meticulous surgical planning to optimize intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. The GORE Excluder Conformable Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endoprosthesis (CEXC Device, WL Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) allows for endovascular treatment of highly angulated and short proximal neck abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Owing to its recent approval, short-term clinical outcomes of this device remain scarce.

REPORT

In this report, we present a case series of 3 patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair using the GORE Excluder Conformable device with highly angulated (>70°) aortic neck anatomy. Endografts were deployed in a radiology suite using standard 2D angiography in conjunction with a CYDAR Medical (Wilmington, Delaware) reconstructed 3D overlay. The patients' ages were 85, 67, and 85 years. The mean abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter in these cases was 6.9 cm. The mean proximal neck length was 2.1 cm, proximal mean neck angulation was 83°. The mean operative time, total fluoroscopy time, and contrast used were 208 minutes, 28.3°minutes, and 94.5 milliliters, respectively. No adjunctive procedures, such as proximal cuff or endo-anchors, were performed at the time of index procedure.

DISCUSSION

Type Ia endoleak was observed in 1 patient post-operatively but after treatment with an aortic cuff there was no evidence of enlarging aneurysm sac. The GORE Excluder Conformable Endoprosthesis expands access to endovascular management of AAAs. Our early experience with this device demonstrated excellent patient and clinical outcomes in a highly angulated neck anatomy.

A Comparison of Venaseal Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Outcomes Within a Managed Care Organization

BACKGROUND

Chronic venous insufficiency is a common medical condition that afflicts over 30 million adults in the United States. Treatment and management have changed dramatically over the past 20 years with the introduction of various endovenous therapies, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cyanoacrylate closure using the Venaseal system. In this study, we explore a direct comparison of outcomes between RFA and VenaSeal conducted by a single surgeon within a managed care organization.

METHODS

Between May 2020 and December 2021, there were 87 patients undergoing 97 total procedures who were treated with either VenaSeal (n = 55) or RFA (n = 42), conducted by a single surgeon within a managed care organization. Primary outcomes included successful greater saphenous vein (GSV) closure, postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT), embolization, saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) thrombosis, skin reaction (allergic or thrombophlebitis), or procedure-related emergency room (ER) and urgent care (UC) visits. Retrospective chart review was conducted to describe patient demographics, indications for treatment, treatment details (number of access sites and indication for treatment), as well as follow-up adjunctive vein procedures (sclerotherapy and stab phlebectomy).

RESULTS

All patients had postprocedural ultrasound (US) performed within 7 days by the operating surgeon and mean overall patient follow-up from index procedure was 12 months; 2 patients were lost to follow-up due to death. All operations utilized intraoperative US, and SFJ thrombosis was not observed in any patient postprocedure. The average age of VenaSeal and RFA groups was 59.05 and 59.51 years, respectively. The average number of access sites during the procedure for VenaSeal and RFA was 1.56 and 1.20, respectively. Of the 55 VenaSeal treatments, 9.1% of patients reported postoperative skin reactions, and 9.1% of patients underwent subsequent stab phlebectomy (22 stabs on average). Of the 42 RFA treatments, 7.1% of RFA patients reported postoperative skin reactions, and 9.5% underwent subsequent stab phlebectomy (36 stabs on average). The percentage of patients who had postoperative UC or emergency department visits related to the procedure in the VenaSeal and RFA groups was 3.6% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VenaSeal and RFA demonstrated effective vein closure of the GSV at 12-month follow-up, with VenaSeal demonstrating continued noninferiority to RFA. Based on our data, postoperative skin reactions do not appear to be significantly higher with VenaSeal treatment, as previously reported.

A Multicenter Analysis of Revision of Aneurysmal Dialysis Access Using Bovine Carotid Artery Conduit

BACKGROUND

Dialysis access complications and failure requiring revision are common. Understanding which methods of revision yield the optimal patency rates and lowest complications remain in evolution. Revision of native vessels is preferred, with revision using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft as an alternative. Revision with Bovine Carotid Artery Graft (Artegraft) has historically been indicated when other options have been exhausted. While earlier studies demonstrated lower patency and higher infection rates compared to ePTFE, more recent studies have suggested otherwise. We describe our experience with patients who underwent arteriovenous access revision with Artegraft, and present this as a viable alternative.

METHODS

A multicenter analysis was conducted over 6 years of 25 patients with arteriovenous access complications requiring revision. Complications included aneurysmal degeneration, bleeding, recurrent thrombosis, and sclerotic outflow. Patients were grouped into 2 groups based on the complication. The first group included aneurysm-only complication and the second group included aneurysm and all other complications. All patients underwent revision of their arteriovenous fistula with excision of diseased segment of the arteriovenous fistula and interposition placement of Artegraft. All patients were followed long term and assessed for postop complications, patency, and any reintervention.

RESULTS

Of 25 patients, 13 were male and 12 female. Average age was 57 (range 27-83). Sixteen of the 25 patients had follow-up. Of the 16, 10 patients had primary patency (62.5%), 3 with primary-assisted patency (18.75%), and 3 with failure of grafts (18.75%). Ten of the 16 had at least 1 year or greater follow-up (5 with primary patency, 3 primary-assisted patency, and 2 with failure both of which failed after 1 year). Those that required intervention to maintain patency were from thrombosis requiring declot or anastomotic stenosis requiring angioplasty. None of the followed patients were found to have neither postoperative surgical site nor graft infections.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series supports that arteriovenous access revision with Artegraft is a viable option that has acceptable patency rates (81% overall functional patency rate at 1.5 years), with an observed 0% infection rate, and is comparable to ePTFE. With more recent studies suggesting Artegraft may have superior outcomes, further study and consideration should be given to using Artegraft as a conduit for arteriovenous fistula revision.

Percutaneous Axillary Artery Access for Peripheral and Complex Endovascular Interventions: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Benefits

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the safety, efficacy, and applicability of percutaneous axillary artery (pAxA) access in patients requiring upper extremity large sheath access during complex aortic, cardiac, and peripheral endovascular procedures. We also take this opportunity to address the potential cost-benefits offered by pAxA access compared to open upper extremity access.

METHODS

A total of 26 consecutive patients, between June 2018 and October 2020, underwent endovascular intervention, requiring upper extremity access (UEA). Ultrasound-guided, percutaneous access of the axillary artery was used in all 26 patients with off-label use of pre-close technique with Perclose ProGlide closure devices. Access sites accommodated sheath sizes that ranged from 6 to 14 French (F). End points were technical success and access site-related complications including isolated neuropathies, hematoma, distal embolization, access-site thrombosis, and post-operative bleeding requiring secondary interventions. Technical success was defined as successful arterial closure intraoperatively with no evidence of stenosis, occlusion, or persistent bleeding, requiring additional intervention.

RESULTS

Of the 26 patients requiring pAxA access, 15 underwent complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs (EVAR) with branched, fenestrated, snorkel, or parallel endografts, 6 underwent peripheral vascular interventions, and 5 underwent cardiac interventions. Fifty-three percent accommodated sheath sizes of 12F or higher. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases with no major perioperative access complications requiring additional open or endovascular procedures. In our series, we had one post-operative mortality secondary to myocardial infarction in a patient with significant coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data again demonstrated the proposed safety and efficacy attributable to pAxA access, while extending its application to wide spectrum of endovascular interventions which included peripheral or coronary vascular in addition to complex EVAR.

Application of the VORTEC Technique in Creating a Proximal Inflow Conduit in the Circumferentially-Calcified or "Lead-Pipe" Aorta

A heavily calcified or "lead-pipe" aorta can present many challenges to any surgeon. There is higher risk of vessel wall rupture or disruption, distal embolization, and prolonged ischemia time of visceral organs due to longer clamp times. Hybrid revascularization techniques, which were originally described in visceral revascularization during complex aortic procedures, can be potentially utilized for lower extremity bypasses. These techniques, such as "VORTEC," are well-studied and have been shown to have similar patency rates as traditional bypass grafts with the added benefit of decreased ischemia time and lower levels of acute kidney injury and visceral organ ischemia. This allows VORTEC and other similar hybrid techniques to be utilized as options when traditional vessel control cannot be safely achieved during distal revascularization procedures, as we describe in our patient.

Accessory renal arteries involved in atherosclerotic occlusive disease at the aortic bifurcation

Accessory renal arteries (ARAs) are embryonic remnants found in more than one-third of patients and occurring bilaterally in 10% of the population. Very few reports have documented such vessels arising near or at the level of the aortic bifurcation. Furthermore, the presence of ARAs has yet to be described in the context of atherosclerotic disease. Here, we present a unique case of large bilateral ARAs originating above the aortic bifurcation concurrent with symptomatic aortoiliac atherosclerotic disease. We highlight the embryologic and clinical significance of these vessels as well as discuss their potential role in accelerating atherosclerotic disease processes.

Pseudoaneurysm of Patent Ductus Arteriosus Following Previous PDA Closure: Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Pseudoaneurysm developing after repair of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is uncommon, with only a handful of cases reported in the literature. While older literature cites infection, recent series suggest that formation of pseudoaneurysm off of a ligated PDA attributed to breakdown in the suture line. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for this rare pathology has been demonstrated in selected case reports.

METHODS/RESULTS

A 61-year-old woman presented with enlarging left chest mass and shortness of breath. The patient reported a history of a PDA with 2 attempts at closure. At age 6, she had undergone an attempt at endovascular closure of the PDA; this subsequently resulted in right lower extremity limb ischemia with resultant below-knee amputation. At age 12, she underwent open thoracotomy with ligation of the PDA; at this procedure, she had injury to her recurrent laryngeal nerve, resulting in permanent hoarseness of voice. A computed tomography angiogram of the chest was obtained, which demonstrated a saccular 4.5 × 3.8 cm pseudoaneurysm in the region of the PDA with calcific wall changes. Recommendation was made to proceed with operative repair and she agreed. A TEVAR was performed using a commercially available stent graft. During the procedure, intravascular ultrasound was performed; however, the connection between the PDA pseudoaneurysm and the aorta was not visualized. She had an uncomplicated operative and postoperative course. Follow-up imaging showed complete thrombosis of the pseudoaneurysm.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudoaneurysm from previous PDA repair is a rare pathology. We present a unique case in which the patient had undergone attempts at both endovascular and open surgical repair. Open repair for PDA is still advocated; however, TEVAR appears to be a safe treatment in adults with this pathology following failed open closure.

Management of Lateral Plantar Artery Pseudoaneurysm After Penetrating Injury in Children

A case of lateral plantar artery pseudoaneurysm following a penetrating injury in a 10-year-old male is presented. Only a handful of such cases have been reported in the literature, and as such, a defined treatment algorithm is lacking. Our case and a review of the literature suggest that these injuries involve vessel transection, making them unsuitable for ultrasound-guided thrombin injection. In addition, the presence of bacterial contamination of the wound makes attempts at endovascular coiling prohibitive. Direct surgical exploration and ligation should remain the mainstay of therapy in most patients.