1
|
Li H, Priest AN, Horvat-Menih I, Huang Y, Li S, Stewart GD, Mendichovszky IA, Francis ST, Gallagher FA. Fast and High-Resolution T 2 Mapping Based on Echo Merging Plus k-t Undersampling with Reduced Refocusing Flip Angles (TEMPURA) as Methods for Human Renal MRI. Magn Reson Med 2024. [PMID: 38730565 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a highly accelerated multi-echo spin-echo method, TEMPURA, for reducing the acquisition time and/or increasing spatial resolution for kidney T2 mapping. METHODS TEMPURA merges several adjacent echoes into one k-space by either combining independent echoes or sharing one echo between k-spaces. The combined k-space is reconstructed based on compressed sensing theory. Reduced flip angles are used for the refocusing pulses, and the extended phase graph algorithm is used to correct the effects of indirect echoes. Two sequences were developed: a fast breath-hold sequence; and a high-resolution sequence. The performance was evaluated prospectively on a phantom, 16 healthy subjects, and two patients with different types of renal tumors. RESULTS The fast TEMPURA method reduced the acquisition time from 3-5 min to one breath-hold (18 s). Phantom measurements showed that fast TEMPURA had a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 8.2%, which was comparable to a standardized respiratory-triggered sequence (7.4%), but much lower than a sequence accelerated by purely k-t undersampling (21.8%). High-resolution TEMPURA reduced the in-plane voxel size from 3 × 3 to 1 × 1 mm2, resulting in improved visualization of the detailed anatomical structure. In vivo T2 measurements demonstrated good agreement (fast: MAPE = 1.3%-2.5%; high-resolution: MAPE = 2.8%-3.3%) and high correlation coefficients (fast: R = 0.85-0.98; high-resolution: 0.82-0.96) with the standardized method, outperforming k-t undersampling alone (MAPE = 3.3-4.5%, R = 0.57-0.59). CONCLUSION TEMPURA provides fast and high-resolution renal T2 measurements. It has the potential to improve clinical throughput and delineate intratumoral heterogeneity and tissue habitats at unprecedented spatial resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Li
- Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew N Priest
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Yuan Huang
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- EPSRC Cambridge Mathematics of Information in Healthcare Hub, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shaohang Li
- Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Grant D Stewart
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Susan T Francis
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ferdia A Gallagher
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li H, Daniel AJ, Buchanan CE, Nery F, Morris DM, Li S, Huang Y, Sousa JA, Sourbron S, Mendichovszky IA, Thomas DL, Priest AN, Francis ST. Improvements in Between-Vendor MRI Harmonization of Renal T 2 Mapping using Stimulated Echo Compensation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024. [PMID: 38380700 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND T2 mapping is valuable to evaluate pathophysiology in kidney disease. However, variations in T2 relaxation time measurements across MR scanners and vendors may occur requiring additional correction. PURPOSE To harmonize renal T2 measurements between MR vendor platforms, and use an extended-phase-graph-based fitting method ("StimFit") to correct stimulated echoes and reduce between-vendor variations. STUDY TYPE Prospective. SUBJECTS 8 healthy "travelling" volunteers (37.5% female, 32 ± 6 years) imaged on four MRI systems across three vendors at four sites, 10 healthy volunteers (50% female, 32 ± 8 years) scanned multiple times on a given MR scanner for repeatability evaluation. ISMRM/NIST system phantom scanned for evaluation of T2 accuracy. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3T, multiecho spin-echo sequence. ASSESSMENT T2 images fit using conventional monoexponential fitting and "StimFit." Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of phantom measurements with reference T2 values. Average cortex and medulla T2 values compared between MR vendors, with masks obtained from T2 -weighted images and T1 maps. Full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) T2 distributions to evaluate local homogeneity of measurements. STATISTICAL TESTS Coefficient of variation (CV), linear mixed-effects model, analysis of variance, student's t-tests, Bland-Altman plots, P-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS In the ISMRM/NIST phantom, "StimFit" reduced the MAPE from 4.9%, 9.1%, 24.4%, and 18.1% for the four sites (three vendors) to 3.3%, 3.0%, 6.6%, and 4.1%, respectively. In vivo, there was a significant difference in kidney T2 measurements between vendors using a monoexponential fit, but not with "StimFit" (P = 0.86 and 0.92, cortex and medulla, respectively). The intervendor CVs of T2 measures were reduced from 8.0% to 2.6% (cortex) and 7.1% to 2.8% (medulla) with StimFit, resulting in no significant differences for the CVs of intravendor repeat acquisitions (P = 0.13 and 0.05). "StimFit" significantly reduced the FWHM of T2 distributions in the cortex and whole kidney. DATA CONCLUSION Stimulated-echo correction reduces renal T2 variation across MR vendor platforms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Li
- The Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexander J Daniel
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Fábio Nery
- Developmental Imaging and Biophysics Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - David M Morris
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shaohang Li
- The Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan Huang
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- EPSRC Cambridge Mathematics of Information in Healthcare Hub, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - João A Sousa
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Steven Sourbron
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - David L Thomas
- Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew N Priest
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Susan T Francis
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gillett D, MacFarlane J, Bashari W, Crawford R, Harper I, Mendichovszky IA, Aloj L, Cheow H, Gurnell M. Molecular Imaging of Pituitary Tumors. Semin Nucl Med 2023; 53:530-538. [PMID: 36966020 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
Tumors of the pituitary gland, although mostly benign adenomas, are a cause of significant morbidity and even excess mortality due to local compressive effects (eg visual loss, hypopituitarism) and unregulated hormone secretion (eg acromegaly or Cushing Disease). Surgery, radiotherapy, and medical management (sometimes in combination) may be needed to mitigate the effects of tumor expansion and endocrine dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a central role in treatment planning for most patients. However, it does not always reliably identify the site(s) of primary or recurrent disease, especially where post-treatment remodeling results in indeterminate anatomical appearances. In these contexts, molecular imaging is a potential game-changer, allowing precise localization of sites of active disease and enabling safe and effective targeted intervention when patients would otherwise be consigned to expensive life-long medication. For pituitary and parasellar imaging, PET is the preferred modality due to its superior spatial resolution and sensitivity compared with SPECT, and an array of PET radioligands have been studied in different pituitary adenoma (PA) subtypes. While 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is widely available, significant heterogeneity in tumoral uptake has limited its use. Instead, ligands targeting specific molecular pathways relevant to PA biology (eg somatostatin or dopamine receptor expression, amino acid uptake) are increasingly preferred and are beginning to find application in routine clinical practice. In addition, novel approaches to distinguish adenomatous tissue from normal gland (eg through comparison of images obtained with different radiotracers) and increase confidence that a suspected abnormal focus is indeed pathological (eg through subtraction imaging) have been proposed. It is likely therefore that molecular imaging will continue to find increasing application in the management of pituitary tumors just as it already does in other endocrine disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gillett
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| | - James MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Waiel Bashari
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rosy Crawford
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ines Harper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luigi Aloj
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK; Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huynh KA, MacFarlane J, Newman C, Gillett D, Das T, Scoffings D, Cheow HK, Moyle P, Koulouri O, Harper I, Aloj L, Mendichovszky IA, Inchiappa D, Buch HN, Chung TT, Simpson HL, Powlson AS, Challis BG, Bashari WA, Stokes VJ, Masterson L, Jani P, Fish B, Gurnell M, Casey RT. Diagnostic utility of 11 C-methionine PET/CT in primary hyperparathyroidism in a UK cohort: A single-centre experience and literature review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2023. [PMID: 37272391 DOI: 10.1111/cen.14933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Primary hyperparathyroidism is a common endocrine disorder, with 80% of all cases usually caused by one single hyperfunctioning parathyroid adenoma. Conventional imaging modalities for the diagnostic work-up of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) include ultrasound of the neck, 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy, and four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT). However, the role of other imaging modalities, such as 11C-methionine PET/CT, in the care pathway for PHPT is currently unclear. Here, we report our experience of the diagnostic utility of 11C-methionine PET/CT in a single-center patient cohort (n = 45). DESIGN Retrospective single-center cohort study. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS The data of eligible patients that underwent 11C-methionine PET/CT between 2014 and 2022 at Addenbrooke's Hospital (Cambridge, UK) were collected and analyzed. The clinical utility of imaging modalities was determined by comparing the imaging result with histopathological and biochemical outcomes following surgery. RESULTS In patients with persistent primary hyperparathyroidism following previous surgery, 11C-methionine PET/CT identified a candidate lesion in 6 of 10 patients (60.0%), and histologically confirmed in 5 (50.0%). 11C-methionine PET/CT also correctly identified a parathyroid adenoma in 9 out of 12 patients (75.0%) that failed to be localized on other imaging modalities. 11C-methionine PET/CT had a sensitivity of 70.0% (95% CI 55.8 - 84.2%) for the detection of parathyroid adenomas. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights a diagnostic role for 11C-methionine PET/CT in patients that have undergone unsuccessful prior surgery or have equivocal or negative prior imaging results, aiding localization and a targeted surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin A Huynh
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - James MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christine Newman
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel Gillett
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tilak Das
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Heok K Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Penelope Moyle
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Olympia Koulouri
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ines Harper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luigi Aloj
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Danilo Inchiappa
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Harit N Buch
- Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Teng-Teng Chung
- Department of Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Helen L Simpson
- Department of Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew S Powlson
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ben G Challis
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Waiel A Bashari
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Victoria J Stokes
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Liam Masterson
- Department of ENT/Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Piyush Jani
- Department of ENT/Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Brian Fish
- Department of ENT/Head and Neck Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ruth T Casey
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medical Genetics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gillett D, Marsden D, Crawford R, Ballout S, MacFarlane J, van der Meulen M, Gillett B, Bird N, Heard S, Powlson AS, Santarius T, Mannion R, Kolias A, Harper I, Mendichovszky IA, Aloj L, Cheow H, Bashari W, Koulouri O, Gurnell M. Development of a bespoke phantom to optimize molecular PET imaging of pituitary tumors. EJNMMI Phys 2023; 10:34. [PMID: 37261547 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00552-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Image optimization is a key step in clinical nuclear medicine, and phantoms play an essential role in this process. However, most phantoms do not accurately reflect the complexity of human anatomy, and this presents a particular challenge when imaging endocrine glands to detect small (often subcentimeter) tumors. To address this, we developed a novel phantom for optimization of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the human pituitary gland. Using radioactive 3D printing, phantoms were created which mimicked the distribution of 11C-methionine in normal pituitary tissue and in a small tumor embedded in the gland (i.e., with no inactive boundary, thereby reproducing the in vivo situation). In addition, an anatomical phantom, replicating key surrounding structures [based on computed tomography (CT) images from an actual patient], was created using material extrusion 3D printing with specialized filaments that approximated the attenuation properties of bone and soft tissue. RESULTS The phantom enabled us to replicate pituitary glands harboring tumors of varying sizes (2, 4 and 6 mm diameters) and differing radioactive concentrations (2 ×, 5 × and 8 × the normal gland). The anatomical phantom successfully approximated the attenuation properties of surrounding bone and soft tissue. Two iterative reconstruction algorithms [ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM); Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL)] with a range of reconstruction parameters (e.g., 3, 5, 7 and 9 OSEM iterations with 24 subsets; BPL regularization parameter (β) from 50 to 1000) were tested. Images were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively by eight expert readers. Quantitatively, signal was the highest using BPL with β = 50; noise was the lowest using BPL with β = 1000; contrast was the highest using BPL with β = 100. The qualitative review found that accuracy and confidence were the highest when using BPL with β = 400. CONCLUSIONS The development of a bespoke phantom has allowed the identification of optimal parameters for molecular pituitary imaging: BPL reconstruction with TOF, PSF correction and a β value of 400; in addition, for small (< 4 mm) tumors with low contrast (2:1 or 5:1), sensitivity may be improved using a β value of 100. Together, these findings should increase tumor detection and confidence in reporting scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gillett
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Daniel Marsden
- Clinical Engineering, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Rosy Crawford
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Safia Ballout
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - James MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Merel van der Meulen
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Bethany Gillett
- East Anglian Regional Radiation Protection Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Nick Bird
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Sarah Heard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Andrew S Powlson
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Thomas Santarius
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Richard Mannion
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Angelos Kolias
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Ines Harper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Luigi Aloj
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Waiel Bashari
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Olympia Koulouri
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
MacFarlane J, Huynh KA, Powlson AS, Kolias AG, Mannion RJ, Scoffings DJ, Mendichovszky IA, Cheow HK, Bashari WA, Jones J, Gillett D, Koulouri O, Gurnell M. Novel imaging techniques in refractory pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 2023:10.1007/s11102-023-01304-9. [PMID: 36971899 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-023-01304-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Accurate localization of the site(s) of active disease is key to informing decision-making in the management of refractory pituitary adenomas when autonomous hormone secretion and/or continued tumor growth challenge conventional therapeutic approaches. In this context, the use of non-standard MR sequences, alternative post-acquisition image processing, or molecular (functional) imaging may provide valuable additional information to inform patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - K A Huynh
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - A S Powlson
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - A G Kolias
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - R J Mannion
- Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - D J Scoffings
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - I A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - H K Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - W A Bashari
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - J Jones
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - D Gillett
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - O Koulouri
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bulat F, Hesse F, Attili B, Solanki C, Mendichovszky IA, Aigbirhio F, Leeper FJ, Brindle KM, Neves AA. Preclinical PET Imaging of Tumor Cell Death following Therapy Using Gallium-68-Labeled C2Am. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1564. [PMID: 36900353 PMCID: PMC10001225 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
There is an unmet clinical need for imaging agents capable of detecting early evidence of tumor cell death, since the timing, extent, and distribution of cell death in tumors following treatment can give an indication of treatment outcome. We describe here 68Ga-labeled C2Am, which is a phosphatidylserine-binding protein, for imaging tumor cell death in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET). A one-pot synthesis of 68Ga-C2Am (20 min, 25 °C, >95% radiochemical purity) has been developed, using a NODAGA-maleimide chelator. The binding of 68Ga-C2Am to apoptotic and necrotic tumor cells was assessed in vitro using human breast and colorectal cancer cell lines, and in vivo, using dynamic PET measurements in mice implanted subcutaneously with the colorectal tumor cells and treated with a TRAIL-R2 agonist. 68Ga-C2Am showed predominantly renal clearance and low retention in the liver, spleen, small intestine, and bone and generated a tumor-to-muscle (T/m) ratio of 2.3 ± 0.4, at 2 h post probe administration and at 24 h following treatment. 68Ga-C2Am has the potential to be used in the clinic as a PET tracer for assessing early treatment response in tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flaviu Bulat
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
- Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
| | - Friederike Hesse
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Bala Attili
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Chandra Solanki
- Addenbrooke’s Hospital Radiopharmacy, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Iosif A. Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
| | - Franklin Aigbirhio
- Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Finian J. Leeper
- Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
| | - Kevin M. Brindle
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
| | - André A. Neves
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stewart GD, Welsh SJ, Ursprung S, Gallagher FA, Jones JO, Shields J, Smith CG, Mitchell TJ, Warren AY, Bex A, Boleti E, Carruthers J, Eisen T, Fife K, Hamid A, Laird A, Leung S, Malik J, Mendichovszky IA, Mumtaz F, Oades G, Priest AN, Riddick ACP, Venugopal B, Welsh M, Riddle K, Hopcroft LEM, Jones RJ. A Phase II study of neoadjuvant axitinib for reducing the extent of venous tumour thrombus in clear cell renal cell cancer with venous invasion (NAXIVA). Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1051-1060. [PMID: 35739300 PMCID: PMC9470559 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01883-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with venous tumour thrombus (VTT) extension into the renal vein (RV) and/or inferior vena cava (IVC) has high peri-surgical morbidity/mortality. NAXIVA assessed the response of VTT to axitinib, a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor. METHODS NAXIVA was a single-arm, multi-centre, Phase 2 study. In total, 20 patients with resectable clear cell RCC and VTT received upto 8 weeks of pre-surgical axitinib. The primary endpoint was percentage of evaluable patients with VTT improvement by Mayo level on MRI. Secondary endpoints were percentage change in surgical approach and VTT length, response rate (RECISTv1.1) and surgical morbidity. RESULTS In all, 35% (7/20) patients with VTT had a reduction in Mayo level with axitinib: 37.5% (6/16) with IVC VTT and 25% (1/4) with RV-only VTT. No patients had an increase in Mayo level. In total, 75% (15/20) of patients had a reduction in VTT length. Overall, 41.2% (7/17) of patients who underwent surgery had less invasive surgery than originally planned. Non-responders exhibited lower baseline microvessel density (CD31), higher Ki67 and exhausted or regulatory T-cell phenotype. CONCLUSIONS NAXIVA provides the first Level II evidence that axitinib downstages VTT in a significant proportion of patients leading to reduction in the extent of surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03494816.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant D Stewart
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Sarah J Welsh
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Ferdia A Gallagher
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - James O Jones
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jacqui Shields
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Thomas J Mitchell
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Axel Bex
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jade Carruthers
- Scottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tim Eisen
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kate Fife
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Alexander Laird
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Faiz Mumtaz
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Andrew N Priest
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Balaji Venugopal
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michelle Welsh
- Scottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kathleen Riddle
- Scottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lisa E M Hopcroft
- Scottish Clinical Trials Research Unit, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert J Jones
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bashari WA, Gillett D, MacFarlane J, Powlson AS, Kolias AG, Mannion R, Scoffings DJ, Mendichovszky IA, Jones J, Cheow HK, Koulouri O, Gurnell M. Modern imaging in Cushing's disease. Pituitary 2022; 25:709-712. [PMID: 35666391 PMCID: PMC9587975 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-022-01236-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Management of Cushing's disease is informed by dedicated imaging of the sella and parasellar regions. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the investigation of choice, a significant proportion (30-50%) of corticotroph tumours are so small as to render MRI indeterminate or negative when using standard clinical sequences. In this context, alternative MR protocols [e.g. 3D gradient (recalled) echo, with acquisition of volumetric data] may allow detection of tumors that have not been previously visualized. The use of hybrid molecular imaging (e.g. 11C-methionine positron emission tomography coregistered with volumetric MRI) has also been proposed as an additional modality for localizing microadenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W A Bashari
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - D Gillett
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - J MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - A S Powlson
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - A G Kolias
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - R Mannion
- Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - D J Scoffings
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - I A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - J Jones
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - H K Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - O Koulouri
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - M Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bashari WA, van der Meulen M, MacFarlane J, Gillett D, Senanayake R, Serban L, Powlson AS, Brooke AM, Scoffings DJ, Jones J, O'Donovan DG, Tysome J, Santarius T, Donnelly N, Boros I, Aigbirhio F, Jefferies S, Cheow HK, Mendichovszky IA, Kolias AG, Mannion R, Koulouri O, Gurnell M. 11C-methionine PET aids localization of microprolactinomas in patients with intolerance or resistance to dopamine agonist therapy. Pituitary 2022; 25:573-586. [PMID: 35608811 PMCID: PMC9345820 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-022-01229-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the potential for 11C-methionine PET (Met-PET) coregistered with volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (Met-PET/MRCR) to inform clinical decision making in patients with poorly visualized or occult microprolactinomas and dopamine agonist intolerance or resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirteen patients with pituitary microprolactinomas, and who were intolerant (n = 11) or resistant (n = 2) to dopamine agonist therapy, were referred to our specialist pituitary centre for Met-PET/MRCR between 2016 and 2020. All patients had persistent hyperprolactinemia and were being considered for surgical intervention, but standard clinical MRI had shown either no visible adenoma or equivocal appearances. RESULTS In all 13 patients Met-PET/MRCR demonstrated a single focus of avid tracer uptake. This was localized either to the right or left side of the sella in 12 subjects. In one patient, who had previously undergone surgery for a left-sided adenoma, recurrent tumor was unexpectedly identified in the left cavernous sinus. Five patients underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy, with subsequent complete remission of hyperprolactinaemia and normalization of other pituitary function; three patients are awaiting surgery. In the patient with inoperable cavernous sinus disease PET-guided stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was performed with subsequent near-normalization of serum prolactin. Two patients elected for a further trial of medical therapy, while two declined surgery or radiotherapy and chose to remain off medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS In patients with dopamine agonist intolerance or resistance, and indeterminate pituitary MRI, molecular (functional) imaging with Met-PET/MRCR can allow precise localization of a microprolactinoma to facilitate selective surgical adenomectomy or SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W A Bashari
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - M van der Meulen
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - J MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Gillett
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - R Senanayake
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - L Serban
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - A S Powlson
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - A M Brooke
- Macleod Diabetes and Endocrine Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - D J Scoffings
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Jones
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - D G O'Donovan
- Department of Neuropathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - J Tysome
- Department of Otolaryngology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - T Santarius
- Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - N Donnelly
- Department of Otolaryngology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - I Boros
- Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - F Aigbirhio
- Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Jefferies
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - H K Cheow
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - I A Mendichovszky
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - A G Kolias
- Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - R Mannion
- Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - O Koulouri
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gillett D, Senanayake R, MacFarlane J, van der Meulen M, Koulouri O, Powlson AS, Crawford R, Gillett B, Bird N, Heard S, Kolias A, Mannion R, Aloj L, Mendichovszky IA, Cheow H, Bashari WA, Gurnell M. Localization of TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma using 11C-methionine image subtraction. EJNMMI Res 2022; 12:26. [PMID: 35524902 PMCID: PMC9079199 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-022-00899-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pituitary adenomas (PA) affect ~ 1:1200 of the population and can cause a wide range of symptoms due to hormone over-secretion, loss of normal pituitary gland function and/or compression of visual pathways, resulting in significantly impaired quality of life. Surgery is potentially curative if the location of the adenoma can be determined. However, standard structural (anatomical) imaging, in the form of MRI, is unable to locate all tumors, especially microadenomas (< 1 cm diameter). In such cases, functional imaging [11C-methionine PET/CT (Met-PET)] can facilitate tumor detection, although may be inconclusive when the adenoma is less metabolically active. We, therefore, explored whether subtraction imaging, comparing findings between two Met-PET scans with medical therapy-induced suppression of tumor activity in the intervening period, could increase confidence in adenoma localization. In addition, we assessed whether normalization to a reference region improved consistency of pituitary gland signal in healthy volunteers who underwent two Met-PET scans without medical suppression. RESULTS We found that the mean percentage differences in maximum pituitary uptake between two Met-PET scans in healthy volunteers were 2.4% for (SUVr) [cerebellum], 8.8% for SUVr [pons], 5.2% for SUVr [gray matter] and 23.1% for the SUVbw [no region]. Laterality, as measured by contrast-noise ratio (CNR), indicated the correct location of the adenoma in all three image types with mean CNR values of 6.2, 8.1 and 11.1 for SUVbw, SUVbwSub and SUVrSub [cerebellum], respectively. Subtraction imaging improved CNR in 60% and 100% of patients when using images generated from SUVbw [no region] and SUVr [cerebellum] scans compared to standard clinical SUVbw imaging. CONCLUSIONS Met-PET scans should be normalized to the cerebellum to minimize the effects of physiological variation in pituitary gland uptake of 11C-methionine, especially when comparing serial imaging. Subtraction imaging following endocrine suppression of tumor function improved lateralization of PA when compared with single time point clinical Met-PET but, importantly, only if the images were normalized to the cerebellum prior to subtraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gillett
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. .,Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Russell Senanayake
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - James MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Merel van der Meulen
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Olympia Koulouri
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Andrew S Powlson
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Rosy Crawford
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Bethany Gillett
- East Anglian Regional Radiation Protection Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Nick Bird
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Sarah Heard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Angelos Kolias
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge & Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Richard Mannion
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge & Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Luigi Aloj
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.,Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.,Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Waiel A Bashari
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.,Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tadimalla S, Wilson DJ, Shelley D, Bainbridge G, Saysell M, Mendichovszky IA, Graves MJ, Guthrie JA, Waterton JC, Parker GJM, Sourbron SP. Bias, Repeatability and Reproducibility of Liver T 1 Mapping With Variable Flip Angles. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 56:1042-1052. [PMID: 35224803 PMCID: PMC9545852 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Three‐dimensional variable flip angle (VFA) methods are commonly used for T1 mapping of the liver, but there is no data on the accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of this technique in this organ in a multivendor setting. Purpose To measure bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of VFA T1 mapping in the liver. Study Type Prospective observational. Population Eight healthy volunteers, four women, with no known liver disease. Field Strength/Sequence 1.5‐T and 3.0‐T; three‐dimensional steady‐state spoiled gradient echo with VFAs; Look‐Locker. Assessment Traveling volunteers were scanned twice each (30 minutes to 3 months apart) on six MRI scanners from three vendors (GE Healthcare, Philips Medical Systems, and Siemens Healthineers) at two field strengths. The maximum period between the first and last scans among all volunteers was 9 months. Volunteers were instructed to abstain from alcohol intake for at least 72 hours prior to each scan and avoid high cholesterol foods on the day of the scan. Statistical Tests Repeated measures ANOVA, Student t‐test, Levene's test of variances, and 95% significance level. The percent error relative to literature liver T1 in healthy volunteers was used to assess bias. The relative error (RE) due to intrascanner and interscanner variation in T1 measurements was used to assess repeatability and reproducibility. Results The 95% confidence interval (CI) on the mean bias and mean repeatability RE of VFA T1 in the healthy liver was 34 ± 6% and 10 ± 3%, respectively. The 95% CI on the mean reproducibility RE at 1.5 T and 3.0 T was 29 ± 7% and 25 ± 4%, respectively. Data Conclusion Bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of VFA T1 mapping in the liver in a multivendor setting are similar to those reported for breast, prostate, and brain. Level of Evidence 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 1
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sirisha Tadimalla
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Biomedical Imaging Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Martin J Graves
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - John C Waterton
- Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester, UK.,Centre for Imaging Sciences, Division of Informatics Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Geoffrey J M Parker
- Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester, UK.,Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Steven P Sourbron
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ursprung S, Woitek R, McLean MA, Priest AN, Crispin-Ortuzar M, Brodie CR, Gill AB, Gehrung M, Beer L, Riddick ACP, Field-Rayner J, Grist JT, Deen SS, Riemer F, Kaggie JD, Zaccagna F, Duarte JAG, Locke MJ, Frary A, Aho TF, Armitage JN, Casey R, Mendichovszky IA, Welsh SJ, Barrett T, Graves MJ, Eisen T, Mitchell TJ, Warren AY, Brindle KM, Sala E, Stewart GD, Gallagher FA. Hyperpolarized 13C-Pyruvate Metabolism as a Surrogate for Tumor Grade and Poor Outcome in Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Proof of Principle Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:335. [PMID: 35053497 PMCID: PMC8773685 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Differentiating aggressive clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from indolent lesions is challenging using conventional imaging. This work prospectively compared the metabolic imaging phenotype of renal tumors using carbon-13 MRI following injection of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate (HP-13C-MRI) and validated these findings with histopathology. Nine patients with treatment-naïve renal tumors (6 ccRCCs, 1 liposarcoma, 1 pheochromocytoma, 1 oncocytoma) underwent pre-operative HP-13C-MRI and conventional proton (1H) MRI. Multi-regional tissue samples were collected using patient-specific 3D-printed tumor molds for spatial registration between imaging and molecular analysis. The apparent exchange rate constant (kPL) between 13C-pyruvate and 13C-lactate was calculated. Immunohistochemistry for the pyruvate transporter (MCT1) from 44 multi-regional samples, as well as associations between MCT1 expression and outcome in the TCGA-KIRC dataset, were investigated. Increasing kPL in ccRCC was correlated with increasing overall tumor grade (ρ = 0.92, p = 0.009) and MCT1 expression (r = 0.89, p = 0.016), with similar results acquired from the multi-regional analysis. Conventional 1H-MRI parameters did not discriminate tumor grades. The correlation between MCT1 and ccRCC grade was confirmed within a TCGA dataset (p < 0.001), where MCT1 expression was a predictor of overall and disease-free survival. In conclusion, metabolic imaging using HP-13C-MRI differentiates tumor aggressiveness in ccRCC and correlates with the expression of MCT1, a predictor of survival. HP-13C-MRI may non-invasively characterize metabolic phenotypes within renal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Ursprung
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Ramona Woitek
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Mary A. McLean
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Andrew N. Priest
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK;
| | - Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
| | - Cara R. Brodie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
| | - Andrew B. Gill
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Marcel Gehrung
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
| | - Lucian Beer
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Antony C. P. Riddick
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.C.P.R.); (T.F.A.); (J.N.A.)
| | - Johanna Field-Rayner
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - James T. Grist
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Surrin S. Deen
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK;
| | - Frank Riemer
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Joshua D. Kaggie
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Fulvio Zaccagna
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Joao A. G. Duarte
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Matthew J. Locke
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Amy Frary
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Tevita F. Aho
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.C.P.R.); (T.F.A.); (J.N.A.)
| | - James N. Armitage
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.C.P.R.); (T.F.A.); (J.N.A.)
| | - Ruth Casey
- Department of Endocrinology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK;
| | - Iosif A. Mendichovszky
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK;
| | - Sarah J. Welsh
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Tristan Barrett
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Martin J. Graves
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK;
| | - Tim Eisen
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Thomas J. Mitchell
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.C.P.R.); (T.F.A.); (J.N.A.)
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton CB10 1RQ, UK
| | - Anne Y. Warren
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Kevin M. Brindle
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
| | - Evis Sala
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| | - Grant D. Stewart
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.C.P.R.); (T.F.A.); (J.N.A.)
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Ferdia A. Gallagher
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (S.U.); (R.W.); (M.A.M.); (M.C.-O.); (C.R.B.); (A.B.G.); (M.G.); (L.B.); (J.F.-R.); (S.S.D.); (F.R.); (J.D.K.); (F.Z.); (J.A.G.D.); (M.J.L.); (A.F.); (I.A.M.); (S.J.W.); (T.B.); (T.E.); (T.J.M.); (A.Y.W.); (K.M.B.); (E.S.); (G.D.S.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; (A.N.P.); (J.T.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gillett D, Bashari W, Senanayake R, Marsden D, Koulouri O, MacFarlane J, van der Meulen M, Powlson AS, Mendichovszky IA, Cheow H, Bird N, Kolias A, Mannion R, Gurnell M. Methods of 3D printing models of pituitary tumors. 3D Print Med 2021; 7:24. [PMID: 34462823 PMCID: PMC8406959 DOI: 10.1186/s41205-021-00118-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pituitary adenomas can give rise to a variety of clinical disorders and surgery is often the primary treatment option. However, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not always reliably identify the site of an adenoma. In this setting molecular (functional) imaging (e.g. 11C-methionine PET/CT) may help with tumor localisation, although interpretation of these 2D images can be challenging. 3D printing of anatomicalal models for other indications has been shown to aid surgical planning and improve patient understanding of the planned procedure. Here, we explore the potential utility of four types of 3D printing using PET/CT and co-registered MRI for visualising pituitary adenomas. Methods A 3D patient-specific model based on a challenging clinical case was created by segmenting the pituitary gland, pituitary adenoma, carotid arteries and bone using contemporary PET/CT and MR images. The 3D anatomical models were printed using VP, MEX, MJ and PBF 3D printing methods. Different anatomicalal structures were printed in color with the exception of the PBF anatomical model where a single color was used. The anatomical models were compared against the computer model to assess printing accuracy. Three groups of clinicians (endocrinologists, neurosurgeons and ENT surgeons) assessed the anatomical models for their potential clinical utility. Results All of the printing techniques produced anatomical models which were spatially accurate, with the commercial printing techniques (MJ and PBF) and the consumer printing techniques (VP and MEX) demonstrating comparable findings (all techniques had mean spatial differences from the computer model of < 0.6 mm). The MJ, VP and MEX printing techniques yielded multicolored anatomical models, which the clinicians unanimously agreed would be preferable to use when talking to a patient; in contrast, 50%, 40% and 0% of endocrinologists, neurosurgeons and ENT surgeons respectively would consider using the PBF model. Conclusion 3D anatomical models of pituitary tumors were successfully created from PET/CT and MRI using four different 3D printing techniques. However, the expert reviewers unanimously preferred the multicolor prints. Importantly, the consumer printers performed comparably to the commercial MJ printing technique, opening the possibility that these methods can be adopted into routine clinical practice with only a modest investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gillett
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. .,Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Waiel Bashari
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Russell Senanayake
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Daniel Marsden
- Clinical Engineering, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Olympia Koulouri
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - James MacFarlane
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Merel van der Meulen
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Andrew S Powlson
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.,Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Nick Bird
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Angelos Kolias
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge & Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Richard Mannion
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge & Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.,Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mendichovszky IA. Editorial for "Deep Learning Whole-Gland and Zonal Prostate Segmentation on a Public MRI Dataset". J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 54:460-461. [PMID: 34056795 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gillett D, Marsden D, Ballout S, Attili B, Bird N, Heard S, Gurnell M, Mendichovszky IA, Aloj L. 3D printing 18F radioactive phantoms for PET imaging. EJNMMI Phys 2021; 8:38. [PMID: 33909154 PMCID: PMC8081805 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00383-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Phantoms are routinely used in molecular imaging to assess scanner performance. However, traditional phantoms with fillable shapes do not replicate human anatomy. 3D-printed phantoms have overcome this by creating phantoms which replicate human anatomy which can be filled with radioactive material. The problem with these is that small objects suffer to a greater extent than larger objects from the effects of inactive walls, and therefore, phantoms without these are desirable. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of creating resin-based 3D-printed phantoms using 18F. Methods Radioactive resin was created using an emulsion of printer resin and 18F-FDG. A series of test objects were printed including twenty identical cylinders, ten spheres with increasing diameters (2 to 20 mm), and a double helix. Radioactive concentration uniformity, printing accuracy and the amount of leaching were assessed. Results Creating radioactive resin was simple and effective. The radioactive concentration was uniform among identical objects; the CoV of the signal was 0.7% using a gamma counter. The printed cylinders and spheres were found to be within 4% of the model dimensions. A double helix was successfully printed as a test for the printer and appeared as expected on the PET scanner. The amount of radioactivity leached into the water was measurable (0.72%) but not visible above background on the imaging. Conclusions Creating an 18F radioactive resin emulsion is a simple and effective way to create accurate and complex phantoms without inactive walls. This technique could be used to print clinically realistic phantoms. However, they are single use and cannot be made hollow without an exit hole. Also, there is a small amount of leaching of the radioactivity to take into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gillett
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. .,Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Daniel Marsden
- Clinical Engineering, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Safia Ballout
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Bala Attili
- Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, AstraZeneca, Darwin Building, Cambridge Science Park Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WG, UK
| | - Nick Bird
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Sarah Heard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Cambridge Endocrine Molecular Imaging Group, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.,Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, UK.,NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.,Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Luigi Aloj
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.,Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aloj L, Giger O, Mendichovszky IA, Challis BG, Ronel M, Harper I, Cheow H, Hoopen RT, Pitfield D, Gallagher FA, Attili B, McLean M, Jones RL, Dileo P, Bulusu VR, Maher ER, Casey RT. The role of [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in wild-type KIT/PDGFRA gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:5. [PMID: 33443647 PMCID: PMC7809083 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00747-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is now recognised as the most sensitive functional imaging modality for the diagnosis of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NET) and can inform treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. However, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression is not unique to NET, and therefore, [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT may have oncological application in other tumours. Molecular profiling of gastrointestinal stromal tumours that lack activating somatic mutations in KIT or PDGFRA or so-called 'wild-type' GIST (wtGIST) has demonstrated that wtGIST and NET have overlapping molecular features and has encouraged exploration of shared therapeutic targets, due to a lack of effective therapies currently available for metastatic wtGIST. AIMS To investigate (i) the diagnostic role of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT; and, (ii) to investigate the potential of this imaging modality to guide treatment with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in patients with wtGIST. METHODS [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was performed on 11 patients with confirmed or metastatic wtGIST and one patient with a history of wtGIST and a mediastinal mass suspicious for metastatic wtGIST, who was subsequently diagnosed with a metachronous mediastinal paraganglioma. Tumour expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) using immunohistochemistry was performed on 54 tumour samples including samples from 8/12 (66.6%) patients who took part in the imaging study and 46 tumour samples from individuals not included in the imaging study. RESULTS [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging was negative, demonstrating that liver metastases had lower uptake than background liver for nine cases (9/12 cases, 75%) and heterogeneous uptake of somatostatin tracer was noted for two cases (16.6%) of wtGIST. However, [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT demonstrated intense tracer uptake in a synchronous paraganglioma in one case and a metachronous paraganglioma in another case with wtGIST. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that SSTR2 is not a diagnostic or therapeutic target in wtGIST. [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT may have specific diagnostic utility in differentiating wtGIST from other primary tumours such as paraganglioma in patients with sporadic and hereditary forms of wtGIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Aloj
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Olivier Giger
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ben G Challis
- Department of Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Meytar Ronel
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Ines Harper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Rogier Ten Hoopen
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Deborah Pitfield
- Department of Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Ferdia A Gallagher
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bala Attili
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mary McLean
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Robin L Jones
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Palma Dileo
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospital Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Venkata Ramesh Bulusu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Eamonn R Maher
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, CB2 OQQ, UK
| | - Ruth T Casey
- Department of Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, CB2 OQQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Aloj L, Attili B, Lau D, Caraco C, Lechermann LM, Mendichovszky IA, Harper I, Cheow H, Casey RT, Sala E, Gilbert FJ, Gallagher FA. The emerging role of cell surface receptor and protein binding radiopharmaceuticals in cancer diagnostics and therapy. Nucl Med Biol 2021; 92:53-64. [PMID: 32563612 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Targeting specific cell membrane markers for both diagnostic imaging and radionuclide therapy is a rapidly evolving field in cancer research. Some of these applications have now found a role in routine clinical practice and have been shown to have a significant impact on patient management. Several molecular targets are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials and show promise for future implementation. Advancements in molecular biology have facilitated the identification of new cancer-specific targets for radiopharmaceutical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Aloj
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Bala Attili
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Doreen Lau
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Corradina Caraco
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Laura M Lechermann
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ines Harper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth T Casey
- Department of Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ferdia A Gallagher
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ross MI, Bird N, Mendichovszky IA, Rimmer YL. Correction to: Neurologically asymptomatic cerebral oligometastatic prostate carcinoma metastasis identified on [Ga]Ga-THP-PSMA PET/CT. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:129. [PMID: 33108550 PMCID: PMC7591637 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00719-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M I Ross
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - N Bird
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - I A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. .,Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. .,Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Y L Rimmer
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ross MI, Bird N, Mendichovszky IA, Rimmer YL. Neurologically asymptomatic cerebral oligometastatic prostate carcinoma metastasis identified on [Ga]Ga-THP-PSMA PET/CT. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:108. [PMID: 32960378 PMCID: PMC7509016 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00696-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases from prostate cancer are rare and usually only occur in the context of widespread systemic disease. This is the first case report of a solitary brain oligometastasis, in a neurologically intact prostate cancer patient with no other systemic disease, detected using [68Ga]Ga-THP-PSMA PET/CT and only the second one using a PSMA-based radiopharmaceutical. Case presentation We report the case of a prostate cancer patient presenting 5 years after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence, no neurological symptoms, and in the absence of metastatic lesions in the body on conventional imaging. A solitary cerebral metastasis was detected using [68Ga]Ga-THP-PSMA PET/CT, surgically resected, leading to a drop in serum PSA and a good recovery. Conclusion In this case, [68Ga]Ga-THP-PSMA PET/CT resulted in a major change in clinical management and avoided additional morbidity associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment. This report demonstrates the importance of considering the presence of metastatic disease outside the conventional locations of prostate cancer spread, as well as the importance of ensuring comprehensive [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT coverage from vertex to upper thighs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M I Ross
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - N Bird
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - I A Mendichovszky
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. .,Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. .,Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Y L Rimmer
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Crispin-Ortuzar M, Gehrung M, Ursprung S, Gill AB, Warren AY, Beer L, Gallagher FA, Mitchell TJ, Mendichovszky IA, Priest AN, Stewart GD, Sala E, Markowetz F. Three-Dimensional Printed Molds for Image-Guided Surgical Biopsies: An Open Source Computational Platform. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2020; 4:736-748. [PMID: 32804543 PMCID: PMC7469624 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Spatial heterogeneity of tumors is a major challenge in precision oncology. The relationship between molecular and imaging heterogeneity is still poorly understood because it relies on the accurate coregistration of medical images and tissue biopsies. Tumor molds can guide the localization of biopsies, but their creation is time consuming, technologically challenging, and difficult to interface with routine clinical practice. These hurdles have so far hindered the progress in the area of multiscale integration of tumor heterogeneity data. METHODS We have developed an open-source computational framework to automatically produce patient-specific 3-dimensional-printed molds that can be used in the clinical setting. Our approach achieves accurate coregistration of sampling location between tissue and imaging, and integrates seamlessly with clinical, imaging, and pathology workflows. RESULTS We applied our framework to patients with renal cancer undergoing radical nephrectomy. We created personalized molds for 6 patients, obtaining Dice similarity coefficients between imaging and tissue sections ranging from 0.86 to 0.96 for tumor regions and between 0.70 and 0.76 for healthy kidneys. The framework required minimal manual intervention, producing the final mold design in just minutes, while automatically taking into account clinical considerations such as a preference for specific cutting planes. CONCLUSION Our work provides a robust and automated interface between imaging and tissue samples, enabling the development of clinical studies to probe tumor heterogeneity on multiple spatial scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marcel Gehrung
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stephan Ursprung
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew B. Gill
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Y. Warren
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lucian Beer
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Thomas J. Mitchell
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | - Iosif A. Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew N. Priest
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Grant D. Stewart
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Evis Sala
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Florian Markowetz
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bane O, Mendichovszky IA, Milani B, Dekkers IA, Deux JF, Eckerbom P, Grenier N, Hall ME, Inoue T, Laustsen C, Lerman LO, Liu C, Morrell G, Pedersen M, Pruijm M, Sadowski EA, Seeliger E, Sharma K, Thoeny H, Vermathen P, Wang ZJ, Serafin Z, Zhang JL, Francis ST, Sourbron S, Pohlmann A, Fain SB, Prasad PV. Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal BOLD MRI. MAGMA 2020; 33:199-215. [PMID: 31768797 PMCID: PMC7021747 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-019-00802-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Harmonization of acquisition and analysis protocols is an important step in the validation of BOLD MRI as a renal biomarker. This harmonization initiative provides technical recommendations based on a consensus report with the aim to move towards standardized protocols that facilitate clinical translation and comparison of data across sites. We used a recently published systematic review paper, which included a detailed summary of renal BOLD MRI technical parameters and areas of investigation in its supplementary material, as the starting point in developing the survey questionnaires for seeking consensus. Survey data were collected via the Delphi consensus process from 24 researchers on renal BOLD MRI exam preparation, data acquisition, data analysis, and interpretation. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% unanimity in response. Among 31 survey questions, 14 achieved consensus resolution, 12 showed clear respondent preference (65-74% agreement), and 5 showed equal (50/50%) split in opinion among respondents. Recommendations for subject preparation, data acquisition, processing and reporting are given based on the survey results and review of the literature. These technical recommendations are aimed towards increased inter-site harmonization, a first step towards standardization of renal BOLD MRI protocols across sites. We expect this to be an iterative process updated dynamically based on progress in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Octavia Bane
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute and Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bastien Milani
- Center for BioMedical Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ilona A Dekkers
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Francois Deux
- Department of Radiology, Groupe Hospitalier Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Per Eckerbom
- Department of Radiology, Institution for Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Nicolas Grenier
- Department of Radiology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Michael E Hall
- Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Tsutomu Inoue
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Christoffer Laustsen
- The MR Research Center Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lilach O Lerman
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chunlei Liu
- Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Glen Morrell
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michael Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Medicine-Comparative Medicine Lab, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Menno Pruijm
- Nephrology and Hypertension Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Elizabeth A Sadowski
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Erdmann Seeliger
- Institute of Physiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kanishka Sharma
- Imaging Biomarkers Group, Department of Biomedical Imaging Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Harriet Thoeny
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cantonal Fribourgois, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Peter Vermathen
- Departments for BioMedical Research and Radiology, Inselspital, Universitaetspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Zhen J Wang
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Zbigniew Serafin
- Department of Radiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Jeff L Zhang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan T Francis
- Sir Peter Mansfield Centre, University of Notthingham, Notthingham, UK
| | - Steven Sourbron
- Imaging Biomarkers Group, Department of Biomedical Imaging Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andreas Pohlmann
- Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sean B Fain
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Pottumarthi V Prasad
- Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abeyakoon O, Morscher S, Dalhaus N, Ford SJ, Mendichovszky IA, Manavaki R, Wallis M, Moyle P, Woitek R, Patterson A, Torheim T, Joseph J, Gonzalez IQ, Bohndiek S, Gilbert FJ. Optoacoustic Imaging Detects Hormone-Related Physiological Changes of Breast Parenchyma. Ultraschall Med 2019; 40:757-763. [PMID: 29879743 DOI: 10.1055/a-0628-6248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Optoacoustic imaging with ultrasound (OPUS) can assess in-vivo perfusion/oxygenation through surrogate measures of oxy, deoxy and total hemoglobin content in tissues. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the ability of OPUS to detect physiological changes in the breast during the menstrual cycle and to determine qualitative/quantitative metrics of normal parenchymal tissue in pre-/post-menopausal women. The secondary aim was to assess the technique's repeatability. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a prospective ethically approved study in volunteers using OPUS (700, 800 and 850 nm wavelengths) in the proliferative/follicular and secretory phase of the menstrual cycle. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the most superficial region of fibroglandular tissue and same-day intra-observer repeatability was assessed. We used t-tests to interrogate differences in the OPUS measurements due to hormonal changes and interclass correlation coefficients/Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the repeatability of mean ROI signal intensities. RESULTS 22 pre-menopausal and 8 post-menopausal volunteers were recruited. 21 participants underwent repeatability examinations. OPUS intensity values were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) at all excitation wavelengths in the secretory compared to the proliferative/follicular phase. Post-menopausal volunteers showed similar optoacoustic values to the proliferative/follicular phase of pre-menopausal volunteers. The repeatability of the technique was comparable to other handheld ultrasound modalities. CONCLUSION OPUS detects changes in perfusion/vascularity related to the menstrual cycle and menopausal status of breast parenchyma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oshaani Abeyakoon
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Stefan Morscher
- Research and Development, iThera Medical GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Nina Dalhaus
- Research and Development, iThera Medical GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Steven J Ford
- Research and Development, iThera Medical GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Roido Manavaki
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Matthew Wallis
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Penelope Moyle
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Ramona Woitek
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Andrew Patterson
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Turid Torheim
- Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - James Joseph
- Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Isabel Quiros Gonzalez
- Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Sarah Bohndiek
- Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Fiona J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bane O, Mendichovszky IA, Milani B, Dekkers IA, Deux JF, Eckerbom P, Grenier N, Hall ME, Inoue T, Laustsen C, Lerman LO, Liu C, Morrell G, Pedersen M, Pruijm M, Sadowski EA, Seeliger E, Sharma K, Thoeny H, Vermathen P, Wang ZJ, Serafin Z, Zhang JL, Francis ST, Sourbron S, Pohlmann A, Fain SB, Prasad PV. Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal BOLD MRI. MAGMA 2019. [PMID: 31768797 DOI: 10.1007/s10334‐019‐00802‐x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Harmonization of acquisition and analysis protocols is an important step in the validation of BOLD MRI as a renal biomarker. This harmonization initiative provides technical recommendations based on a consensus report with the aim to move towards standardized protocols that facilitate clinical translation and comparison of data across sites. We used a recently published systematic review paper, which included a detailed summary of renal BOLD MRI technical parameters and areas of investigation in its supplementary material, as the starting point in developing the survey questionnaires for seeking consensus. Survey data were collected via the Delphi consensus process from 24 researchers on renal BOLD MRI exam preparation, data acquisition, data analysis, and interpretation. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% unanimity in response. Among 31 survey questions, 14 achieved consensus resolution, 12 showed clear respondent preference (65-74% agreement), and 5 showed equal (50/50%) split in opinion among respondents. Recommendations for subject preparation, data acquisition, processing and reporting are given based on the survey results and review of the literature. These technical recommendations are aimed towards increased inter-site harmonization, a first step towards standardization of renal BOLD MRI protocols across sites. We expect this to be an iterative process updated dynamically based on progress in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Octavia Bane
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute and Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bastien Milani
- Center for BioMedical Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ilona A Dekkers
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Francois Deux
- Department of Radiology, Groupe Hospitalier Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Per Eckerbom
- Department of Radiology, Institution for Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Nicolas Grenier
- Department of Radiology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Michael E Hall
- Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Tsutomu Inoue
- Department of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Christoffer Laustsen
- The MR Research Center Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lilach O Lerman
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chunlei Liu
- Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Glen Morrell
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michael Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Medicine-Comparative Medicine Lab, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Menno Pruijm
- Nephrology and Hypertension Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Elizabeth A Sadowski
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Erdmann Seeliger
- Institute of Physiology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kanishka Sharma
- Imaging Biomarkers Group, Department of Biomedical Imaging Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Harriet Thoeny
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cantonal Fribourgois, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Peter Vermathen
- Departments for BioMedical Research and Radiology, Inselspital, Universitaetspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Zhen J Wang
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Zbigniew Serafin
- Department of Radiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Jeff L Zhang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan T Francis
- Sir Peter Mansfield Centre, University of Notthingham, Notthingham, UK
| | - Steven Sourbron
- Imaging Biomarkers Group, Department of Biomedical Imaging Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andreas Pohlmann
- Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sean B Fain
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Pottumarthi V Prasad
- Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Selby NM, Blankestijn PJ, Boor P, Combe C, Eckardt KU, Eikefjord E, Garcia-Fernandez N, Golay X, Gordon I, Grenier N, Hockings PD, Jensen JD, Joles JA, Kalra PA, Krämer BK, Mark PB, Mendichovszky IA, Nikolic O, Odudu A, Ong ACM, Ortiz A, Pruijm M, Remuzzi G, Rørvik J, de Seigneux S, Simms RJ, Slatinska J, Summers P, Taal MW, Thoeny HC, Vallée JP, Wolf M, Caroli A, Sourbron S. Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for chronic kidney disease: a position paper from the European Cooperation in Science and Technology Action PARENCHIMA. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 33:ii4-ii14. [PMID: 30137584 PMCID: PMC6106645 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Functional renal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has seen a number of recent advances, and techniques are now available that can generate quantitative imaging biomarkers with the potential to improve the management of kidney disease. Such biomarkers are sensitive to changes in renal blood flow, tissue perfusion, oxygenation and microstructure (including inflammation and fibrosis), processes that are important in a range of renal diseases including chronic kidney disease. However, several challenges remain to move these techniques towards clinical adoption, from technical validation through biological and clinical validation, to demonstration of cost-effectiveness and regulatory qualification. To address these challenges, the European Cooperation in Science and Technology Action PARENCHIMA was initiated in early 2017. PARENCHIMA is a multidisciplinary pan-European network with an overarching aim of eliminating the main barriers to the broader evaluation, commercial exploitation and clinical use of renal MRI biomarkers. This position paper lays out PARENCHIMA's vision on key clinical questions that MRI must address to become more widely used in patients with kidney disease, first within research settings and ultimately in clinical practice. We then present a series of practical recommendations to accelerate the study and translation of these techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas M Selby
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter J Blankestijn
- Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Boor
- Institute of Pathology and Department of Nephrology, RWTH University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christian Combe
- Service de Néphrologie Transplantation Dialyse Aphérèse, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Kai-Uwe Eckardt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eli Eikefjord
- Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
| | | | - Xavier Golay
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Isky Gordon
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nicolas Grenier
- Service d'Imagerie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle de l'Adulte, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux Place Amelie Raba-Leon, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Jens D Jensen
- Departments of Renal and Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jaap A Joles
- Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Philip A Kalra
- Department of Renal Medicine, Salford Royal Hospital and Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bernhard K Krämer
- Vth Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick B Mark
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Olivera Nikolic
- Faculty of Medicine,University of Novi Sad, Center of Radiology, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Serbia
| | - Aghogho Odudu
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Albert C M Ong
- Academic Nephrology Unit, Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- Nephrology and Hypertension, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz UAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Menno Pruijm
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Remuzzi
- IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Jarle Rørvik
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sophie de Seigneux
- Service of Nephrology, Department of Medicine Specialties, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Roslyn J Simms
- Academic Nephrology Unit, Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Janka Slatinska
- Department of Nephrology, Transplant Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Paul Summers
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Radiology Division, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
- QMRI Tech iSrl, Piazza dei Martiri Pennesi 20, Pescara, Italy
| | - Maarten W Taal
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, University of Nottingham, UK
| | - Harriet C Thoeny
- University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
- HFR Fribourg, Hôpital Cantonal, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Paul Vallée
- Radiology Department, Geneva University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Marcos Wolf
- Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, MR-Centre of Excellence, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna Caroli
- IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Steven Sourbron
- Leeds Imaging Biomarkers Group, Department of Biomedical Imaging Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pruijm M, Mendichovszky IA, Liss P, Van der Niepen P, Textor SC, Lerman LO, Krediet CTP, Caroli A, Burnier M, Prasad PV. Renal blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging to measure renal tissue oxygenation: a statement paper and systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 33:ii22-ii28. [PMID: 30137579 PMCID: PMC6106642 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Tissue hypoxia plays a key role in the development and progression of many kidney diseases. Blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) is the most promising imaging technique to monitor renal tissue oxygenation in humans. BOLD-MRI measures renal tissue deoxyhaemoglobin levels voxel by voxel. Increases in its outcome measure R2* (transverse relaxation rate expressed as per second) correspond to higher deoxyhaemoglobin concentrations and suggest lower oxygenation, whereas decreases in R2* indicate higher oxygenation. BOLD-MRI has been validated against micropuncture techniques in animals. Its reproducibility has been demonstrated in humans, provided that physiological and technical conditions are standardized. BOLD-MRI has shown that patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD) or kidneys with severe renal artery stenosis have lower tissue oxygenation than controls. Additionally, CKD patients with the lowest cortical oxygenation have the worst renal outcome. Finally, BOLD-MRI has been used to assess the influence of drugs on renal tissue oxygenation, and may offer the possibility to identify drugs with nephroprotective or nephrotoxic effects at an early stage. Unfortunately, different methods are used to prepare patients, acquire MRI data and analyse the BOLD images. International efforts such as the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action 'Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers for Chronic Kidney Disease' (PARENCHIMA) are aiming to harmonize this process, to facilitate the introduction of this technique in clinical practice in the near future. This article represents an extensive overview of the studies performed in this field, summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of the technique, provides recommendations about patient preparation, image acquisition and analysis, and suggests clinical applications and future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menno Pruijm
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Per Liss
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Patricia Van der Niepen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stephen C Textor
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lilach O Lerman
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - C T Paul Krediet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Academic Medical Center at the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Caroli
- Medical Imaging Unit, Bioengineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Michel Burnier
- Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Caroli A, Schneider M, Friedli I, Ljimani A, De Seigneux S, Boor P, Gullapudi L, Kazmi I, Mendichovszky IA, Notohamiprodjo M, Selby NM, Thoeny HC, Grenier N, Vallée JP. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to assess diffuse renal pathology: a systematic review and statement paper. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 33:ii29-ii40. [PMID: 30137580 PMCID: PMC6106641 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is a non-invasive method sensitive to local water motion in the tissue. As a tool to probe the microstructure, including the presence and potentially the degree of renal fibrosis, DWI has the potential to become an effective imaging biomarker. The aim of this review is to discuss the current status of renal DWI in diffuse renal diseases. DWI biomarkers can be classified in the following three main categories: (i) the apparent diffusion coefficient-an overall measure of water diffusion and microcirculation in the tissue; (ii) true diffusion, pseudodiffusion and flowing fraction-providing separate information on diffusion and perfusion or tubular flow; and (iii) fractional anisotropy-measuring the microstructural orientation. An overview of human studies applying renal DWI in diffuse pathologies is given, demonstrating not only the feasibility and intra-study reproducibility of DWI but also highlighting the need for standardization of methods, additional validation and qualification. The current and future role of renal DWI in clinical practice is reviewed, emphasizing its potential as a surrogate and monitoring biomarker for interstitial fibrosis in chronic kidney disease, as well as a surrogate biomarker for the inflammation in acute kidney diseases that may impact patient selection for renal biopsy in acute graft rejection. As part of the international COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) action PARENCHIMA (Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers for Chronic Kidney Disease), aimed at eliminating the barriers to the clinical use of functional renal magnetic resonance imaging, this article provides practical recommendations for future design of clinical studies and the use of renal DWI in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Caroli
- Medical Imaging Unit, Bioengineering Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Moritz Schneider
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center, German Center for Lung Research, Munich, Germany
| | - Iris Friedli
- Division of Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra Ljimani
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Sophie De Seigneux
- Service and Laboratory of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine Specialties and Department of Physiology and Metabolism, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Peter Boor
- Institute of Pathology and Division of Nephrology, RWTH University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Latha Gullapudi
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Isma Kazmi
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Nicholas M Selby
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Harriet C Thoeny
- Department of Diagnostic, Pediatric, and Interventional Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Grenier
- Service d'Imagerie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle de l'Adulte, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Paul Vallée
- Division of Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mendichovszky IA, Powlson AS, Manavaki R, Aigbirhio FI, Cheow H, Buscombe JR, Gurnell M, Gilbert FJ. Targeted Molecular Imaging in Adrenal Disease-An Emerging Role for Metomidate PET-CT. Diagnostics (Basel) 2016; 6:diagnostics6040042. [PMID: 27869719 PMCID: PMC5192517 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics6040042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Revised: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Adrenal lesions present a significant diagnostic burden for both radiologists and endocrinologists, especially with the increasing number of adrenal ‘incidentalomas’ detected on modern computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A key objective is the reliable distinction of benign disease from either primary adrenal malignancy (e.g., adrenocortical carcinoma or malignant forms of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL)) or metastases (e.g., bronchial, renal). Benign lesions may still be associated with adverse sequelae through autonomous hormone hypersecretion (e.g., primary aldosteronism, Cushing’s syndrome, phaeochromocytoma). Here, identifying a causative lesion, or lateralising the disease to a single adrenal gland, is key to effective management, as unilateral adrenalectomy may offer the potential for curing conditions that are typically associated with significant excess morbidity and mortality. This review considers the evolving role of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in addressing the limitations of traditional cross-sectional imaging and adjunctive techniques, such as venous sampling, in the management of adrenal disorders. We review the development of targeted molecular imaging to the adrenocortical enzymes CYP11B1 and CYP11B2 with different radiolabeled metomidate compounds. Particular consideration is given to iodo-metomidate PET tracers for the diagnosis and management of adrenocortical carcinoma, and the increasingly recognized utility of 11C-metomidate PET-CT in primary aldosteronism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iosif A Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Andrew S Powlson
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Roido Manavaki
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Franklin I Aigbirhio
- Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK.
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - John R Buscombe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Fiona J Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tofts PS, Cutajar M, Mendichovszky IA, Peters AM, Gordon I. Precise measurement of renal filtration and vascular parameters using a two-compartment model for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the kidney gives realistic normal values. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:1320-30. [PMID: 22415410 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2382-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2011] [Revised: 11/25/2011] [Accepted: 12/04/2011] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To model the uptake phase of T(1)-weighted DCE-MRI data in normal kidneys and to demonstrate that the fitted physiological parameters correlate with published normal values. METHODS The model incorporates delay and broadening of the arterial vascular peak as it appears in the capillary bed, two distinct compartments for renal intravascular and extravascular Gd tracer, and uses a small-vessel haematocrit value of 24%. Four physiological parameters can be estimated: regional filtration K ( trans ) (ml min(-1) [ml tissue](-1)), perfusion F (ml min(-1) [100 ml tissue](-1)), blood volume v ( b ) (%) and mean residence time MRT (s). From these are found the filtration fraction (FF; %) and total GFR (ml min(-1)). Fifteen healthy volunteers were imaged twice using oblique coronal slices every 2.5 s to determine the reproducibility. RESULTS Using parenchymal ROIs, group mean values for renal biomarkers all agreed with published values: K ( trans ): 0.25; F: 219; v ( b ): 34; MRT: 5.5; FF: 15; GFR: 115. Nominally cortical ROIs consistently underestimated total filtration (by ~50%). Reproducibility was 7-18%. Sensitivity analysis showed that these fitted parameters are most vulnerable to errors in the fixed parameters kidney T(1), flip angle, haematocrit and relaxivity. CONCLUSIONS These renal biomarkers can potentially measure renal physiology in diagnosis and treatment. KEY POINTS • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can measure renal function. • Filtration and perfusion values in healthy volunteers agree with published normal values. • Precision measured in healthy volunteers is between 7 and 15%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul S Tofts
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Sussex BN1 9PX, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chrysochou C, Mendichovszky IA, Buckley DL, Cheung CM, Jackson A, Kalra PA. BOLD imaging: a potential predictive biomarker of renal functional outcome following revascularization in atheromatous renovascular disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 27:1013-9. [PMID: 21856759 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stenting of the stenosed renal artery is commonly employed in atheromatous renovascular disease (ARVD) in order to revascularize the affected kidney. However, it is still far from clear which patient subgroups should be revascularized as stenting carries small but significant risks. We have previously demonstrated that the ratio of magnetic resonance-measured renal volume to isotopic single kidney glomerular filtration rate (isoSK-GFR) is higher in kidneys which show functional improvement after revascularization. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not require contrast administration and is sensitive to changes in tissue concentration of deoxyhaemoglobin. METHODS In this study, we test the hypothesis that baseline BOLD R2* map signal and R2*:isoSK-GFR ratio will provide an additional independent predictive biomarker of response to revascularization. RESULTS Studies were performed in 28 subjects (16 ARVD and 12 controls). All subjects had R2* mapping and isoSK-GFR measured at baseline and at 4-month follow-up. MRI data were collected on a 3 T whole-body MRI scanner using a coronal dual-echo, 2D gradient-echo breath-hold acquisition. Parenchymal regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on a representative slice through the middle of the kidney. Parametric maps of R2* were generated and mean values of R2* were calculated for every ROI. The ratio of R2*:isoSK-GFR at baseline was significantly greater in kidneys where renal function improved (5.91 ± 6.51) versus stable (1.78 ± 1.11), deteriorated (2.15 ± 1.79) or controls (1.5 ± 0.91), P = 0.003. R2*:isoSK-GFR ratio that was greater than 95% confidence interval of the control kidneys was 66.7% sensitive, but 85.7% specific in predicting a positive renal functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS These pilot data show that BOLD R2* imaging, presumably by detecting intra-renal deoxyhaemoglobin in still viable 'hibernating' parenchyma, coupled with isoSK-GFR may provide an effective predictive biomarker for positive renal functional response to revascularization. R2* imaging is non-invasive, quick to perform and could provide further insight into reversible parenchymal changes in ARVD kidneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantina Chrysochou
- The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Salford Royal Hospital, Salford, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mendichovszky IA, Marks SD, Simcock CM, Olsen ØE. Gadolinium and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: time to tighten practice. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38:489-96; quiz 602-3. [PMID: 17943276 PMCID: PMC2292494 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-007-0633-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2007] [Revised: 07/31/2007] [Accepted: 08/23/2007] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is a relatively new entity, first described in 1997. Few cases have been reported, but the disease has high morbidity and mortality. To date it has been seen exclusively in patients with renal dysfunction. There is an emerging link with intravenous injection of gadolinium contrast agents, which has been suggested as a main triggering factor, with a lag time of days to weeks. Risk factors include the severity of renal impairment, major surgery, vascular events and other proinflammatory conditions. There is no reason to believe that children have an altered risk compared to the adult population. It is important that the paediatric radiologist acknowledges emerging information on NSF but at the same time considers the risk:benefit ratio prior to embarking on alternative investigations, as children with chronic kidney disease require high-quality diagnostic imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iosif A. Mendichovszky
- Radiology and Physics Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen D. Marks
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare M. Simcock
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH UK
| | - Øystein E. Olsen
- Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH UK
| |
Collapse
|