Perinatal Stressors and Consequences for Neonates with Critical Congenital Heart Disease

INTRODUCTION

The prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) is a traumatic event that can cause expectant parents to experience anxiety, depression, and toxic stress. Prenatal exposure to stress may impact neonatal postoperative outcomes. In addition, expectant parents may have other psychosocial stressors that may compound maternal stress. We investigated the relationship between stress in pregnancies complicated by prenatally diagnosed CHD and their neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

A pilot retrospective cohort study of pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed critical CHD (2019-2021) was performed. The collected data included pregnancy characteristics and neonatal and postoperative outcomes (including the need for exogenous corticosteroid treatment (ECT)). In order to quantify prenatal stressors, a composite prenatal stress score (PSS) was established and utilized.

RESULTS

In total, 41 maternal-fetal dyads were evaluated. Thirteen (32%) neonates had single-ventricle anatomy. The need for ECT after CHD surgery was associated with higher pregnant patient PSS (p = 0.01). PSS did not correlate with birthweight, infection, or hypoglycemia in the neonatal period.

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal stress is multifactorial; higher PSS is correlates with post-bypass ECT, suggesting that a stressful intrauterine environment may be associated with worse neonatal postoperative outcomes.

Preventing eviction during pregnancy: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a theoretical safety-net program

BACKGROUND

Eviction during pregnancy has been shown to be associated with adverse birth outcomes. A safety net program focused on covering the costs of rent during pregnancy may aid in preventing adverse complications.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a program covering the cost of rent to prevent eviction during pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

A cost-effectiveness model using TreeAge software was designed to evaluate the cost, effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with eviction compared to no eviction during pregnancy. The cost of eviction from a societal perspective was compared to the annual cost of housing in the no eviction group, which was estimated by the median contract rent in the United States from 2021 national census data. Birth outcomes included preterm birth, neonatal death, and major neurodevelopmental delay. Probabilities and costs were derived from the literature. The cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. We performed univariable and multivariable sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

In our theoretical cohort of 30,000 pregnant individuals aged 15 to 44 years facing eviction annually, the no eviction during pregnancy strategy was associated with 1427 fewer preterm births, 47 fewer neonatal deaths, and 44 fewer cases of neurodevelopmental delay compared to eviction. At the median cost of rent in the United States, the no eviction strategy was associated with increased quality-adjusted life-years and decreased costs. Therefore, the no eviction strategy was the dominant strategy. In univariate sensitivity analysis varying the cost of housing, no eviction remained the cost-effective strategy and was cost-saving when rent was below $1016 per month.

CONCLUSION

The no eviction strategy is cost-effective and reduces cases of preterm birth, neonatal death, and neurodevelopmental delay. When rent is below the median of $1016 per month, no eviction is the cost-saving strategy. These findings suggest that policies supporting social programmatic implementation for rent coverage for pregnant people at risk of eviction have the potential to be highly beneficial in reducing costs and disparities in perinatal outcomes.

Adverse Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes Among Adolescent Pregnancies in the United States

BACKGROUND

Despite a downward trend in recent years, adolescent pregnancies in the United States remain higher than any other Western country. Adolescent pregnancies have been inconsistently associated with adverse perinatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between adolescent pregnancies and adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes in the United States.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton births in the US from 2014 to 2020 using national vital statistics data. Perinatal outcomes included gestational diabetes (GDM), gestational hypertension (gHTN), preterm delivery <37 weeks (PTB), cesarean delivery (CD), chorioamnionitis, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), and neonatal composite outcome. Chi-square tests were used to compare outcomes among adolescent (13-19 years) vs. adult (20-29 years) pregnancies. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine association of adolescent pregnancies with perinatal outcomes. For each outcome, we utilized three models: unadjusted logistic regression, adjusted for demographics, and adjusted for demographics and medical comorbidities. Similar analyses were used to compare younger (13-17 years) and older (18-19 years) adolescent pregnancies to adults.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 14,014,078 pregnancies, we found that adolescents were at an increased risk of PTB (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.12, 99% confidence interval (CI)1.12-1.13) and SGA (aOR 1.02, 99% CI 1.01-1.03) compared to adult pregnancies. We also found that multiparous adolescents with a prior history of CD were at an increased risk of CD, compared to adults. For all other outcomes, adult pregnancies were at higher risk for adverse outcomes in the adjusted models. When comparing birth outcomes among adolescents, we found that older adolescents are at an increased risk of PTB, while younger adolescents are at an increased risk of both PTB and SGA.

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for confounders, our study demonstrates adolescents have an increased risk of preterm birth and SGA, compared to adults.

Shorter Sleep Predicts Longer Subsequent Day Sedentary Duration in Healthy Midlife Adults, but Not in Those with Sleep Apnea

PURPOSE

Sedentary behavior and suboptimal sleep increase risks for chronic diseases. We hypothesized that sedentary behavior and sleep affect each other and that an underlying sleep disorder would alter these relationships. To test these hypotheses, we studied the bidirectional relationships between sedentary behavior and sleep (duration and efficiency) in healthy controls (HC) and people with untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-two volunteers (18 HC, 19 mild OSA [apnea/hypopnea index [AHI] range 5-14.9/hour], 15 moderate OSA [AHI range 15-29.9/hour]) were studied with actigraphy and sleep diaries across ~9 consecutive nights of self-selected consistent ~8-hour sleep episodes at home (range 4-21/nights per person). We analyzed whether total time asleep and sleep efficiency affected the subsequent daytime sedentary duration while controlling for body mass index and whether the severity of OSA altered this relationship. We also tested the reverse relationship, namely whether daytime sedentary duration affected the subsequent night's sleep and if any such relationship differed with OSA severity.

RESULTS

Overnight sleep duration and efficiency negatively predicted the subsequent day's sedentary duration in HC (p<0.02), but not in people with mild or moderate OSA (p>0.05). There was no significant reverse relationship between daytime sedentary duration and the subsequent night's sleep duration or efficiency (p≥0.2).

CONCLUSION

In healthy adults, short nighttime sleep predicts a longer duration of sedentary behavior on a subsequent day, but we did not observe this relationship in people with OSA. The mechanisms underlying this association in healthy individuals and its disruption in the presence of OSA need to be studied.