Preventing eviction during pregnancy: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a theoretical safety-net program

BACKGROUND

Eviction during pregnancy has been shown to be associated with adverse birth outcomes. A safety net program focused on covering the costs of rent during pregnancy may aid in preventing adverse complications.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a program covering the cost of rent to prevent eviction during pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

A cost-effectiveness model using TreeAge software was designed to evaluate the cost, effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with eviction compared to no eviction during pregnancy. The cost of eviction from a societal perspective was compared to the annual cost of housing in the no eviction group, which was estimated by the median contract rent in the United States from 2021 national census data. Birth outcomes included preterm birth, neonatal death, and major neurodevelopmental delay. Probabilities and costs were derived from the literature. The cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. We performed univariable and multivariable sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

In our theoretical cohort of 30,000 pregnant individuals aged 15 to 44 years facing eviction annually, the no eviction during pregnancy strategy was associated with 1427 fewer preterm births, 47 fewer neonatal deaths, and 44 fewer cases of neurodevelopmental delay compared to eviction. At the median cost of rent in the United States, the no eviction strategy was associated with increased quality-adjusted life-years and decreased costs. Therefore, the no eviction strategy was the dominant strategy. In univariate sensitivity analysis varying the cost of housing, no eviction remained the cost-effective strategy and was cost-saving when rent was below $1016 per month.

CONCLUSION

The no eviction strategy is cost-effective and reduces cases of preterm birth, neonatal death, and neurodevelopmental delay. When rent is below the median of $1016 per month, no eviction is the cost-saving strategy. These findings suggest that policies supporting social programmatic implementation for rent coverage for pregnant people at risk of eviction have the potential to be highly beneficial in reducing costs and disparities in perinatal outcomes.

Women and coronary disease: relationship between descriptors of signs and symptoms and diagnostic and treatment course

BACKGROUND: Heart disease is the No. 1 killer among women in the United States. Differences in the clinical features of coronary heart disease among men and women have been reported, along with various approaches to the diagnostic workup and therapeutic interventions. PURPOSE: To explore the relationship between descriptors of signs and symptoms of coronary heart disease and follow-up care and to investigate any differences between male and female patients. METHODS: Structured interviews with patients and chart audits were used to assess initial signs and symptoms, associated cardiac-related signs and symptoms, and the diagnostic tests and interventions used for treatment. The sample consisted of 98 patients (51 women and 47 men) who were admitted with a medical diagnosis of myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Chest pain was the most common sign or symptom reported by both men and women. The 4 most common associated signs and symptoms were identical in men and women: fatigue, rest pain, shortness of breath, and weakness. However, significantly more women than men reported loss of appetite, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, and back pain. Women were also less likely than men to have angiography and to receive i.v. nitroglycerin, heparin, and thrombolytic agents as part of acute management of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Chest pain remains the initial symptom of acute myocardial infarction in both men and women. However, women may experience some different associated signs and symptoms than do men. Despite these similarities, men still are more likely than women to have angiography and to receive a number of therapies.

Women and coronary disease: relationship between descriptors of signs and symptoms and diagnostic and treatment course

BACKGROUND

Heart disease is the No. 1 killer among women in the United States. Differences in the clinical features of coronary heart disease among men and women have been reported, along with various approaches to the diagnostic workup and therapeutic interventions.

PURPOSE

To explore the relationship between descriptors of signs and symptoms of coronary heart disease and follow-up care and to investigate any differences between male and female patients.

METHODS

Structured interviews with patients and chart audits were used to assess initial signs and symptoms, associated cardiac-related signs and symptoms, and the diagnostic tests and interventions used for treatment. The sample consisted of 98 patients (51 women and 47 men) who were admitted with a medical diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Chest pain was the most common sign or symptom reported by both men and women. The 4 most common associated signs and symptoms were identical in men and women: fatigue, rest pain, shortness of breath, and weakness. However, significantly more women than men reported loss of appetite, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, and back pain. Women were also less likely than men to have angiography and to receive i.v. nitroglycerin, heparin, and thrombolytic agents as part of acute management of myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

Chest pain remains the initial symptom of acute myocardial infarction in both men and women. However, women may experience some different associated signs and symptoms than do men. Despite these similarities, men still are more likely than women to have angiography and to receive a number of therapies.