Epidemiology, clinical features and prognostic factors in patients with Covid-19 and acute limb ischaemia - A single center study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, clinical and paraclinical characteristics and outcomes of Covid-19 positive patients presenting in the Emergency Department (ED) with and treated for acute limb ischaemia (ALI) during a 2-year period.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in the ED of St. Spiridon County Clinical Emergency Hospital in Iasi, north-east region of Romania. The patients included in this study presented in the ED between March 1st, 2020 and February 28th, 2022 with ALI and Covid-19.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total number of 141018 patients were evaluated in our ED, 8578 (representing 6,08%) patients being diagnosed with Covid-19. Of them, 98 (1.14% of all with Covid-19) presented ALI. The mean age was 70.9 ± 10.23 and 67.3% of the patients were males. At admission, 57% of patients had Covid-19-related pneumonia, identified on X-ray or CT scan. Of all patients, 81 (82%) were diagnosed with ALI in lower limbs with 10% of them having affected both limbs. 95% of the patients presented comorbidities, the main being cardiac (85%), diabetes mellitus (37%), vascular (24%) and neurological (22.6%). Non-survivor patients were more likely to have Covid-19 pneumonia on chest X-ray or CT scan, 92% versus 44% (OR 15, CI 3.3; 68, p < .01), lymphopenia 96% versus 70% (OR 10.2, CI 1.30; 80.9, p < .01), a NLR over 9.77% versus 30% (OR 7.5, CI 2.6; 21.4, p < .01), acidosis 65% versus 33% (OR 3.8, CI 1.4; 9.7, p < .01), abnormal AST, 69% versus 29% (OR 5.4, CI 2; 14.5, p < .01) and secondary amputation, 38.5 versus 11.1% (OR 5, CI 1.7; 14.7, p < 0.1). Overall, the mortality rate was 26.5%.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of ALI in patients infected with Covid-19 who were evaluated in our ED was 1.14%. The highest mortality rate was probably related to Covid-19 pneumonia. We observed that patients with Covid-19 pneumonia, lymphopenia, a NLR >9, metabolic acidosis, increased AST at ED admission and secondary amputation had a higher mortality.

Fatigue amongst anaesthesiology and intensive care trainees in Europe: A matter of concern

BACKGROUND

There is a growing awareness of the effects of fatigue on trainee wellbeing and health. Trainees in anaesthesiology and intensive care work long hours, switching work schedules frequently with insufficient rest. This may have unwanted long-term effects on mental and physical health and emotional well being, resulting in burnout and affecting patient safety.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, severity, causes and effects of work-related fatigue in trainees in anaesthesiology and intensive care.

DESIGN

Online survey of trainees in anaesthesiology and intensive care.

SETTINGS

A total of 31 countries within Europe were included in the survey.

PARTICIPANTS

European anaesthesiology and intensive care trainees who responded to an invitation to take part by electronic mail or through social media.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Responses from a 29-item online survey to assess the realities within European countries with regards to work-related fatigue.

RESULTS

One thousand and two hundred trainees from 31 European countries answered the survey demonstrating that an alarming number of trainees were fatigued by their working patterns and night shifts. Trainees reported effects on personal well being, safe commuting and potential for clinical errors. Respondents described a lack of support from hospitals and management for recovery during and after night shifts.

CONCLUSION

Fatigue among trainees in anaesthesiology and intensive care has a significant impact on their well being and potentially, on the incidence of clinical errors. Current measures from authorities and hospital management are not sufficient to prevent serious fatigue, and therefore a fatigue risk management system should be considered. Failure to address this issue might lead to a further decline in trainees' wellbeing, their capacity to work in the speciality in the future, and potentially increase patient care errors.

Surgical Apgar Score predictive value for early postoperative organ dysfunction in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical APGAR Score (SAS) is based only on intraoperative data and has the advantage of being easy to calculate. Low SAS was associated with an increased risk for postoperative complications, but its utility for specific outcomes prediction, such as postoperative cardiovascular, renal, or metabolic dysfunction is less investigated. Our study aimed to investigate SAS predictive value for early postoperative organ dysfunction in a surgical oncological population.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study that enrolled all consecutive patients submitted to oncologic surgery over 20-days. Registered parameters included demographics, comorbidities, diagnosis and surgery data, SAS score, postoperative complications, organ dysfunction and in-hospital mortality. SAS predictive value for postoperative organ dysfunction was assessed using logistic regression and ROC curves.

RESULTS

The study included 205 oncological patients with a mean age (standard deviation) of 60 (12.8) years. SAS was between 8 and 10 in 60% of patients and between 0 and 7 in 40% of patients. Postoperative complications developed in 33 patients (16.1%) and organ dysfunction in 26 patients (12.7%). The rates of postoperative complications, organ dysfunction and mortality, were significantly higher in patients with a low SAS (0-7) than high SAS (8-10). SAS had a low discrimination capacity to distinguish between patients who will develop postoperative complications and those who will not (AUROC 0.65) but was more accurate in identifying surgical oncological patients at risk for cardiovascular and metabolic dysfunction (AUROC 0.83 and 0.85 respectively).

CONCLUSION

SAS may be a useful tool to identify cancer surgery patients at risk for postoperative cardiovascular and metabolic dysfunction.