Phase II study investigating the efficacy and safety of glesatinib (MGCD265) in patients with advanced NSCLC containing MET activating alterations

OBJECTIVES

Dysregulated signaling by mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) and heightened AXL activation are implicated in the pathogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Glesatinib (MGCD265) is an investigational, oral inhibitor of MET and AXL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This open-label, Phase II study investigated glesatinib (free-base suspension [FBS] capsule 1050 mg BID or spray-dried dispersion [SDD] tablet 750 mg BID) in patients with advanced, previously treated NSCLC across four cohorts grouped according to presence of MET activating mutations or amplification in tumor or ctDNA. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were enrolled: n = 28 and n = 8 with MET exon 14 skipping mutations in tumor tissue and ctDNA, respectively, and n = 20 and n = 12 with MET gene amplification in tumor tissue and ctDNA, respectively. Overall, ORR was 11.8 %, median progression-free survival was 4.0 months, and median overall survival was 7.0 months. Among patients with MET activating mutations, ORR was 10.7 % with tumor testing and 25.0 % with ctDNA testing. For MET amplification, responses were observed only in patients enrolled by tumor testing (ORR 15.0 %). Diarrhea (82.4 %), nausea (50.0 %), increased alanine aminotransferase (41.2 %), fatigue (38.2 %), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (36.8 %) were the most frequent adverse events assessed as related to study medication. Glesatinib exposure was similar with the SDD tablet and FBS capsule formulations. The study was terminated early by the sponsor due to modest clinical activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Glesatinib had an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced, pre-treated NSCLC with MET activating alterations. Modest clinical activity was observed, which likely reflects suboptimal drug bioavailability suggested by previously reported Phase I data, and pharmacodynamic findings of lower than anticipated increases in circulating soluble shed MET ectodomain (s-MET).

SAPPHIRE: phase III study of sitravatinib plus nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy revolutionized treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, most patients progress due to primary or acquired resistance. Sitravatinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that can shift the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment toward an immunostimulatory state. Combining sitravatinib with nivolumab (sitra + nivo) may potentially overcome initial CPI resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the phase III SAPPHIRE study, patients with advanced non-oncogenic driven, nonsquamous NSCLC who initially benefited from (≥4 months on CPI without progression) and subsequently experienced disease progression on or after CPI combined with or following platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 to sitra (100 mg once daily administered orally) + nivo (240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks administered intravenously) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks administered intravenously). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR; all assessed by blinded independent central review), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 577 patients included randomized: sitra + nivo, n = 284; docetaxel, n = 293 (median follow-up, 17.1 months). Sitra + nivo did not significantly improve OS versus docetaxel [median, 12.2 versus 10.6 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.05; P = 0.144]. The median PFS was 4.4 versus 5.4 months, respectively (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89-1.32; P = 0.452). The ORR was 15.6% for sitra + nivo and 17.2% for docetaxel (P = 0.597); CBR was 75.5% and 64.5%, respectively (P = 0.004); median DOR was 7.4 versus 7.1 months, respectively (P = 0.924). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 53.0% versus 66.7% of patients receiving sitra + nivo versus docetaxel, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although median OS was numerically longer with sitra + nivo, the primary endpoint was not met in patients with previously treated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. The safety profiles demonstrated were consistent with previous reports.

Telaglenastat plus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II ENTRATA Trial

PURPOSE

Glutaminase is a key enzyme, which supports elevated dependency of tumors on glutamine-dependent biosynthesis of metabolic intermediates. Dual targeting of glucose and glutamine metabolism by the mTOR inhibitor everolimus plus the oral glutaminase inhibitor telaglenastat showed preclinical synergistic anticancer effects, which translated to encouraging safety and efficacy findings in a phase I trial of 2L+ renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study evaluated telaglenastat plus everolimus (TelaE) versus placebo plus everolimus (PboE) in patients with advanced/metastatic RCC (mRCC) in the 3L+ setting (NCT03163667).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with mRCC, previously treated with at least two prior lines of therapy [including ≥1 VEGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)] were randomized 2:1 to receive E, plus Tela or Pbo, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; one-sided α <0.2).

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were randomized (46 TelaE, 23 PboE). Patients had a median three prior lines of therapy, including TKIs (100%) and checkpoint inhibitors (88%). At median follow-up of 7.5 months, median PFS was 3.8 months for TelaE versus 1.9 months for PboE [HR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-1.20; one-sided P = 0.079]. One TelaE patient had a partial response and 26 had stable disease (SD). Eleven patients on PboE had SD. Treatment-emergent adverse events included fatigue, anemia, cough, dyspnea, elevated serum creatinine, and diarrhea; grade 3 to 4 events occurred in 74% TelaE patients versus 61% PboE.

CONCLUSIONS

TelaE was well tolerated and improved PFS versus PboE in patients with mRCC previously treated with TKIs and checkpoint inhibitors.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase 3b/4 CheckMate 920 trial

BACKGROUND

CheckMate 920 (NCT02982954) is a multicohort, phase 3b/4 clinical trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment in predominantly US community-based patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clinical features mostly excluded from phase 3 trials. We report safety and efficacy results from the advanced non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) cohort of CheckMate 920.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated advanced/metastatic nccRCC, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and any International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk received up to four doses of nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for ≤2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥3 immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) within 100 days of last dose of study drug. Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS; both investigator-assessed), time to response (TTR), and duration of response (DOR), all using RECIST V.1.1. Overall survival (OS) was exploratory.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients with nccRCC (unclassified histology, 42.3%; papillary, 34.6%; chromophobe, 13.5%; translocation-associated, 3.8%; collecting duct, 3.8%; renal medullary, 1.9%) received treatment. With 24.1 months minimum study follow-up, median duration of therapy (range) was 3.5 (0.0-25.8) months for nivolumab and 2.1 (0.0-3.9) months for ipilimumab. Median (range) number of doses received was 4.5 (1-28) for nivolumab and 4.0 (1-4) for ipilimumab. Grade 3-4 immune-mediated AEs were diarrhea/colitis (7.7%), rash (5.8%), nephritis and renal dysfunction (3.8%), hepatitis (1.9%), adrenal insufficiency (1.9%), and hypophysitis (1.9%). No grade 5 immune-mediated AEs occurred. ORR (n=46) was 19.6% (95% CI 9.4 to 33.9). Two patients achieved complete response (papillary, n=1; unclassified, n=1), seven achieved partial response (papillary, n=4; unclassified, n=3), and 17 had stable disease. Median TTR was 2.8 (range 2.1-14.8) months. Median DOR was not reached (range 0.0+-27.8+); eight of nine responders remain without reported progression. Median PFS (n=52) was 3.7 (95% CI 2.7 to 4.6) months. Median OS (n=52) was 21.2 (95% CI 16.6 to not estimable) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab for previously untreated advanced nccRCC showed no new safety signals and encouraging antitumor activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02982954.

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab as Maintenance Therapy in Extensive-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 451

In extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), response rates to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are robust, but responses lack durability. CheckMate 451, a double-blind phase III trial, evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy for ED-SCLC.

Abstract 727: Comprehensive genomic profiling of &gt;1000 plasma and tumor tissue samples from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients gives insight into targeted treatment strategies

Background: The phase 2 TRITON2 (NCT02952534) study is evaluating the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor rucaparib in mCRPC patients with a deleterious germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, or 1 of 12 other DNA damage repair (DDR) genes who have progressed on prior androgen receptor-directed therapy and 1 taxane-based therapy. Here we present results from central genomic screening of plasma and tissue samples for TRITON2.

Methods: Plasma samples were profiled for genomic alterations (GAs) in 70 genes and tumor tissue FFPE samples for GAs in 395 genes by Foundation Medicine, Inc., using next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays. Deleterious alterations included frameshift, nonsense, and deleterious missense mutations, protein-truncating rearrangements, and (for tissue samples) homozygous loss. Tissue samples included both archival and more recent specimens, whereas plasma samples were collected at the time of disease progression on prior therapy.

Results: As of July 2, 2018, 359 plasma samples from patients with mCRPC were screened for deleterious GAs in a DDR gene. Of the plasma samples, 96% (343/359) were successfully sequenced for a comprehensive genomic profile. The most commonly altered genes were AR (49%) and TP53 (48%). Deleterious GAs were detected in BRCA1 (2%), BRCA2 (10%), ATM (15%), CDK12 (6%), or other DDR genes (6%). GAs in the MAPK pathway were observed in 5% of plasma samples. Additionally, 738 tissue samples from primary prostate cancer tumors (78%) or metastases (22%) were profiled. Only 66% of tissue samples (487/738) were sequenced successfully, highlighting the challenges associated with NGS of predominantly archival prostate tissues (median sample age, 2.5 years [range, 4 days to 21 years]). The most commonly altered genes were TP53 (38%), PTEN (33%), ERG-TEMPRSS2 fusions (28%), AR (15%), and MYC (9%). Deleterious GAs were observed in BRCA1(2%), BRCA2 (9%), ATM (7%), CDK12 (7%), or other DDR genes (5%), as well as in the PI3K/AKT (41%), Wnt (11%), MAPK (5%), and mismatch repair (3%) pathways. Further, GAs in the DDR, PI3K/AKT, and Wnt pathways were observed at a higher rate in metastatic (42%, 40%, and 15%, respectively) than in primary prostate tissues (32%, 34%, and 12%, respectively). Updated and expanded genomic analyses and plasma-tissue concordance analyses will be presented.

Conclusions: Genomic NGS profiling of plasma and FFPE tumor tissue samples successfully identified patients with GAs in a DDR gene for the evaluation of rucaparib in mCRPC. The plasma assay is convenient for patients and has a low NGS failure rate, whereas the tumor tissue assay has a higher failure rate but can detect more alteration types. Taken together, these data highlight the strengths and limitations of tissue and plasma testing to identify GAs for targeted therapies in mCRPC.

Citation Format: Foad Green, Jeremy D. Shapiro, Ray McDermott, Josep Maria Piulats, Alison Reid, Peter Ostler, Jingsong Zhang, David Campbell, Dominique Spaeth, Ivor Percent, Arif Hussain, Andrew D. Simmons, Tony Golsorkhi, Simon P. Watkins, Andrea Loehr, Simon Chowdhury, Wassim Abida. Comprehensive genomic profiling of &gt;1000 plasma and tumor tissue samples from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients gives insight into targeted treatment strategies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 727.

Phase I trial of weekly tigatuzumab, an agonistic humanized monoclonal antibody targeting death receptor 5 (DR5)

BACKGROUND

TRA-8 is a murine agonist monoclonal antibody to death receptor 5 (DR5), which is able to trigger apoptosis in DR5 positive human tumor cells without the aid of crosslinking. It has demonstrated cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy to a wide range of solid tumors in murine xenograft models. Tigatuzumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody derived from TRA-8.

METHODS

A phase I trial of tigatuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory carcinomas (n = 16) or lymphoma (n = 1) was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety. Three to six (3-6) patients were enrolled in successive escalating cohorts at doses ranging from 1 to 8 mg/kg weekly.

RESULTS

Seventeen (17) patients enrolled, 9 in the 1-, 2-, and 4-mg/kg dose cohorts (3 in each cohort) and 8 in the 8-mg/kg dose cohort. Tigatuzumab was well tolerated with no DLTs observed, and the MTD was not reached. There were no study-drug-related grade 3 or 4, renal, hepatic, or hematologic toxicities. Plasma half-life was 6-10 days, and no anti-tigatuzumab responses were detected. Seven (7) patients had stable disease, with the duration of response ranging from 81 to 798 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigatuzumab is well tolerated, and the MTD was not reached. The high number of patients with stable disease suggests antitumor activity.

A Pilot Trial of Pre-Operative (Neoadjuvant) Letrozole in Combination with Bevacizumab in Post-Menopausal Women with Newly Diagnosed Estrogen and/or Progesterone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose Tumor content or expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is associated with impaired efficacy of anti-estrogen adjuvant therapy. We designed a pilot study of neoadjuvant letrozole and bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) to assess feasibility and short term efficacy in post-menopausal women with stage II/III, ER/PR positive breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were treated with a neo-adjuvant regimen of letrozole, 2.5mg/day (P.O.) and bevacizumab 15mg/kg Q3 weeks (I.V.) for a total of 24 weeks prior to surgical treatment of their breast cancer. Patients were followed for toxicity at 3 week intervals and tumor assessment (physical exam and tumor ultrasound) at 6 week intervals. PET scans were carried out prior to therapy and 6 weeks after initiation of therapy. Surgery was done 4 weeks after the last dose of bevacizumab. Results Twenty five evaluable patients were treated. The regimen was well tolerated except for 2 patients who were taken off-study for difficult to control hypertension. Objective clinical response occurred in 17/25 patients (68%) including 16% CR and 52% PR. The 4 patients with clinical CR had pathologic CR in their breasts (16%) although one had residual tumor cells in axillary nodes. 8/25 patients (32%) attained stage 0 or 1 status. PET scan response at 6 weeks correlated with clinical CR and breast pathologic CR at 24 weeks (p &lt; 0.0036). Conclusion Combination neo-adjuvant therapy with letrozole and bevacizumab was well tolerated and resulted in impressive clinical and pathologic responses. The Breast Cancer Translational Research Consortium has an ongoing randomized phase II trial of this regimen in this patient population.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 1088.

A study of pre-operative (neoadjuvant) letrozole in combination with bevacizumab in post-menopausal women with newly diagnosed operable breast cancer: A preliminary safety report

11020

Background: Our preclinical studies suggest that up-regulation of tumor cell VEGF is a mechanism to subvert estrogen dependence in hormone responsive breast cancer resulting in reduced efficacy or acquired resistance; we hypothesized that the combination of Bevacizumab (an anti-VEGF MoAb) and hormonal therapy would be more effective than hormonal therapy alone for breast cancer. Methods: Post-menopausal patients with ER and/or PR positive and Her-2-neu negative operable (T2–4a-c/N 0–2/M0) breast cancer were enrolled. Patients received letrozole (2.5 mg po daily) and Bevacizumab (15 mg/kg IV q 3 wks). Patients were reevaluated every 6 wks for a total of 24 wks; patients with CR/PR/SD in the first evaluation continued in the trial; after an additional 6 weeks of therapy patients with PD or SD were taken off-study and only patients with PR/CR completed 24 weeks of therapy. Definitive surgery was performed at the discretion of the surgeon no sooner than 4 wks after the last dose of bevacizumab. Patients continued letrozole while waiting for surgery. Up to December 2006, 27 patients have been enrolled with 13 patients too early to evaluate. Results: The 14 patients off-study had a median age of 63 years (range; 56 to 79) and an ECOG score of 0 for all patients. None of the patients received therapy for breast cancer before enrollment in the trial. 11 patients were stage II and 3 patients stage III. No treatment-related severe adverse events were seen. Treatment related toxicities were: grade 3 hypertension (n=1), grade 2 hypertension (n=7), grade 2 fatigue (n=2), grade 2 joint pain (n=3), grade 2 hot flashes (n=2), grade 1 proteinuria (n=1); 2 patients were taken off-study because of uncontrolled hypertension occurring on initial infusion of bevacizumab (not evaluable for efficacy). Of the 12 patients evaluable for response, 2 patients had pCR, 8 PR and 2 PD (at 9 weeks and 16 weeks). There have been no problems with wound healing or bleeding related to surgery or progressive disease while awaiting surgery. Conclusions: Combination letrozole and bevacizumab has substantial clinical efficacy and is well tolerated. The combination therapy will be evaluated in a randomized Breast Cancer Research Consortium Trial.

[Table: see text]

Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with a Novel Anti-TAG-72 Fusion Protein

Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (RIT) increases the dose of radionuclide delivered to tumor sites while limiting radiation to normal tissues. The three components in Pretarget include a streptavidin-containing targeting molecule, a synthetic clearing agent (sCA), and (90)Y and/or (111)In-DOTA-biotin. This trial determined the feasibility and safety of using a genetically engineered fusion protein directed to TAG-72 as the targeting agent. Nine (9) patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TAG-72+) received 160 mg/m(2) of CC49Fusion protein intravenously (i.v.), followed by the sCA, 45 mg/m(2) i.v. Twenty-four (24) hours later, patients received radiolabeled DOTA-biotin (either 0.65 or 1.3 mg/m(2)). All patients received 5 mCi of (111)In-DOTA-biotin for imaging and dosimetry purposes and patients 4-9 received 10 mCi/m2 of (90)Y-DOTA-biotin as well. The mean plasma T1/2 of CC49Fusion protein was 23 +/- 6 hours. Greater than 95% of the circulating CC49Fusion protein was eliminated from the circulation within 6 hours of sCA administration. The radiolabeled DOTA-biotin rapidly localized to tumor sites while the unbound fraction was rapidly excreted. The mean tumor-to-marrow radiation dose ratio was 139:1 and mean tumor: whole body was 56:1. No infusion-related, renal, hepatic, or hematologic toxicities were noted. CC49Fusion protein performs well in a pretargeted RIT schema, and further study with escalating doses of (90)Y should be pursued. This strategy has the potential to deliver effective radiation tumor doses to TAG- 72+ tumors.