Clinical and molecular practice of European thoracic pathology laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic. The past and the near future

Background

This study evaluated the consequences in Europe of the COVID-19 outbreak on pathology laboratories orientated toward the diagnosis of thoracic diseases.

Materials and methods

A survey was sent to 71 pathology laboratories from 21 European countries. The questionnaire requested information concerning the organization of biosafety, the clinical and molecular pathology, the biobanking, the workload, the associated research into COVID-19, and the organization of education and training during the COVID-19 crisis, from 15 March to 31 May 2020, compared with the same period in 2019.

Results

Questionnaires were returned from 53/71 (75%) laboratories from 18 European countries. The biosafety procedures were heterogeneous. The workload in clinical and molecular pathology decreased dramatically by 31% (range, 3%-55%) and 26% (range, 7%-62%), respectively. According to the professional category, between 28% and 41% of the staff members were not present in the laboratories but did teleworking. A total of 70% of the laboratories developed virtual meetings for the training of residents and junior pathologists. During the period of study, none of the staff members with confirmed COVID-19 became infected as a result of handling samples.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a strong impact on most of the European pathology laboratories included in this study. Urgent implementation of several changes to the organization of most of these laboratories, notably to better harmonize biosafety procedures, was noted at the onset of the pandemic and maintained in the event of a new wave of infection occurring in Europe.

•

Biosafety measures used in the first wave of the COVID-19 crisis were heterogeneous in 53 European pathology laboratories.

•

A dramatic decrease of the workload in pathology laboratories was noted.

•

No case of healthcare workers contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 associated with samples handling was identified.

Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Biological Principles and Future Opportunities

Immunotherapy aims to amplify the anticancer immune response through reactivation of the lymphocytic response raised against several tumor neo-antigens. To obtain an effective immune response, this therapeutic approach requires that a number of immunological checkpoints be passed, such as the activation of excitatory costimulatory signals or the avoidance of coinhibitory molecules. Among the immune checkpoints, the interaction of the membrane-bound ligand PD-1 and its receptor PD-L1 has received much attention because of remarkable efficacy in numerous clinical trials for various cancer types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, several limitations exist with these therapeutic agents when used as monotherapy, with objective responses observed in only 30-40% of patients, with the majority of patients demonstrating innate resistance, and approximately 25% of responders later demonstrating disease progression. Recent developments in the understanding of cancer immunology have the potential to identify mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors through translational research in human samples. This review focuses on the biological basic principles for immunological checkpoint blockade, and highlights the current status and the perspectives of this therapeutic approach in NSCLC patients.

[Emphysema, did you say emphysema?]

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common condition that may initially look simple but may conceal other diseases capable of accelerating its natural history or even simulating it. We describe four cases presenting as COPD with emphysema that were reclassified on the basis of certain clinical characteristics and the radiological pattern.

CASE REPORTS

A 52 year old never smoking woman presenting with emphysema was eventually diagnosed as having lymphangioleiomyomatosis on the basis of an abdominal CT scan showing kidney angiomyolipomas. A 44 years old smoker presenting with rapidly evolving emphysema was eventually diagnosed as having Langerhans cell histiocytosis on the basis of a previous chest CT (four years earlier) showing cavitating nodules. An airport refueler, 73 years old, with severe emphysema despite never having smoked, was eventually diagnosed as suffering from alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. The last patient was a 54 year old man, a never smoker, who presented with severe airflow limitation and multilobar hyperlucency, with bronchiectasis in the same areas. He was eventually diagnosed as having a severe form of the Swyer-James-MacLeod syndrome.

CONCLUSION

These four case reports underline the importance of questioning the diagnosis of COPD when certain particular phenotypic characteristics are identified.

[The biological rationale for immunotherapy in cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy aims to promote the immune system's activity against malignant cells by stimulating the response to several tumor antigens.

STATE OF THE ART

Immunosurveillance may adjust the immunogenicity of tumors. To be effective, immunity must induce the specific activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, as well as activation of innate immunity. Activator and inhibitory costimulatory molecules regulate T lymphocyte activation at immunity checkpoints such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4. Adaptive immune resistance confers tumour resistance to immunosurveillance through these immune checkpoints.

PERSPECTIVES

Approaches involving the combination of several immunotherapies with each other or with chemotherapy and radiotherapy and antibodies against other molecules of costimulation are under development. The development of biomarkers, which can select a targeted population and predict therapeutic response, represents a major challenge. Tumour high-throughput sequencing could refine "immunoscore". Intratumoral T cell receptor seems to represent a promising biomarker.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous challenges still remain in developing research approaches for the development of immunotherapies.