Efficacy on resynchronization and longitudinal contractile function comparing His-bundle pacing with conventional biventricular pacing: a substudy to the His-alternative study

AIMS

His-bundle pacing has emerged as a novel method to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, there are no data comparing conventional biventricular (BiV)-CRT with His-CRT with regard to effects on mechanical dyssynchrony and longitudinal contractile function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with symptomatic heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) by strict ECG criteria were randomized 1:1 to His-CRT or BiV-CRT. Two-dimensional strain echocardiography was performed prior to CRT implantation and at 6 months after implantation. Differences in changes in mechanical dyssynchrony (standard deviation of time-to-peak in 12 midventricular and basal segments) and regional longitudinal strain in the six left ventricular walls were compared between the BiV-CRT and His-CRT groups.In the on-treatment analysis, 31 received BiV-CRT and 19 His-CRT. In both groups, mechanical dyssynchrony was significantly reduced after 6 months [BiV group from 120 ms (±45) to 63 ms (±22), P < 0.001, and His group from 116 ms (±54) to 49 ms (±11), P < 0.001] but no significant differences in changes could be demonstrated between groups [-9.0 ms (-36; 18), P = 0.50]. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved in both groups [BiV group from -9.1% (±2.7) to -10.7% (±2.6), P = 0.02, and His group from -8.6% (±2.1) to -11.1% (±2.0), P < 0.001], but no significant differences in changes could be demonstrated from baseline to follow-up [-0.9% (-2.4; -0.6), P = 0.25] between groups. There were no regional differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

In heart failure, patients with LBBB, BiV-CRT, and His-CRT have comparable effects with regard to improvements in mechanical dyssynchrony and longitudinal contractile function.

The value of coronary computed tomography and very early invasive coronary angiography compared to standard intervention in older patients after non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Background

The optimal management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) remains a challenge. The merits of both computed tomography angiography (CTA) as a rule-out test for significant coronary artery disease and early invasive coronary angiography (ICA) are debated. Furthermore, there are limited data in older NSTEACS patients, who likely have more coronary artery calcification and are at higher risk of ACS-related complications.

Methods

This is a post hoc analysis of patients ≥75 years included in the Very Early Versus Standard Care Invasive Examination and Treatment of Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Trial (VERDICT). The diagnostic accuracy of CTA was investigated in patients without previous coronary artery bypass grafting, renal dysfunction, or atrial fibrillation; the presence of a coronary artery stenosis ≥50% determined by ICA was used as reference. Patients were randomised to very early ICA within 12 hours of diagnosis or standard care (ICA within 48–72 hours of diagnosis) and followed for up to five years. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal recurrent MI, hospital admission for refractory myocardial ischaemia or hospital admission for heart failure.

Results

From November 2010 to June 2016, 2147 patients were included in the VERDICT trial. Of these, 452 (21%) patients were ≥75 years of age. Most older patients had a GRACE score &gt;140 (n=388, 88.8%). At the time of admission, older patients had lower levels of haemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction, and more often displayed elevated troponins and electrocardiogram changes indicating new ischaemia, than those &lt;75 years.

Of patients ≥75 years of age, 161 (35.6%) underwent CTA before ICA. Older patients had significantly higher calcium scores than younger patients (1187±1445 vs. 499±858 Agatston units, p&lt;0.001). 19% of CTAs excluded significant coronary artery disease. The negative predictive value of the CTAs was 94 (95% CI 79–99)% and the sensitivity was 98 (95% CI 94–100)%, figure 1.

The primary endpoint was observed more frequently in patients ≥75 years as compared to younger patients (n=222, 49% vs. n=390, 23%, p&lt;0.001), even after adjustment for allocated treatment (adjusted HR 2.65, 95% CI 2.25–3.13, p&lt;0.001). Among older patients randomised to very early ICA, there were no differences in the cumulated number of primary endpoints compared to older patients randomised to standard ICA (log-rank p=0.36), figure 2.

Conclusion

Among patients ≥75 years old with NSTEACS, CTA showed a high diagnostic accuracy. A very early ICA within 12 hours of diagnosis did not improve long-term composite outcome in these older patients with NSTEACS.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Rigshospitalets Research Foundation

Increased prevalence of premature coronary atherosclerosis after preeclampsia

Background

Women with preeclampsia have increased risk of manifest coronary artery disease later in life. However, it remains unknown if and when premature coronary atherosclerotic stages can be identified. This knowledge could enable early intervention in women considered at high risk for future manifest coronary artery disease.

Purpose

Using cardiac computed tomography, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of premature coronary atherosclerosis in women with previous preeclampsia in comparison with women from the general population.

Methods

Women, aged 40–55 years, with previous preeclampsia were recruited in the CPH-PRECIOUS study and compared 1:1 with age- and parity-matched women from the CGPS. Both groups underwent a cardiac computed tomography, including a contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography and a non-contrast coronary artery calcium scoring, as well as an overall assessment of cardiovascular risk factors imbedded in an extensive questionnaire. Cardiac computed tomography examinations were analysed blindly. The main outcome of the study was the prevalence of any coronary atherosclerosis defined as any plaque at coronary computed tomography angiography or a calcium score &gt;0 in case of a non-diagnostic coronary computed tomography angiography.

Results

A total of 1,424 women were included (715 women with previous preeclampsia and 709 controls from the general population). Women with previous preeclampsia were more likely to have cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus). The prevalence of any coronary atherosclerosis was significantly higher in the preeclampsia group (27.4% vs. 20.0%) (P=0.001). A calcium score &gt;0 was also more prevalent in the preeclampsia group (16.6% vs. 11.8%) (P=0.009). Preeclampsia remained an independent risk factor for the presence of any coronary atherosclerosis after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors (age, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, smoking, body mass index, parity) (OR=1.37, 95% CI (1.05–1.79), P=0.021).

Conclusion

Women with previous preeclampsia are more likely show premature signs of coronary atherosclerosis compared with an age- and parity matched control group from the general population. Preeclampsia is an independent risk factor for premature coronary atherosclerosis.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The Danish Heart FoundationSkibsreder Per Henriksen, R og Hustrus FondKong Christian den Tiendes FondBrødrene Hartmanns FondHans og Nora Buchards FondArvid Nilssons FondAnita og Tage Therkelsens FondLægefondenAase og Ejnar Danielsens FondHjertecentrets Forskningsudvalg (Rigshospitalet)Direktør Kurt Bønnelycke og Hustru Fru Grethe Bønnelyckes FondLægeforeningens ForskningsfondTorben & Alice Frimodt FondHenry og Astrid Møllers Fond

Potential future increase in extreme one-hour precipitation events over Europe due to climate change

In this study the potential increase of extreme precipitation in a future warmer European climate has been examined. Output from the regional climate model (RCM) HIRHAM4 covering Europe has been analysed for two periods, a control period 1961-1990 and a scenario 2071-2100, the latter following the IPCC scenario A2. The model has a resolution of about 12 km, which is unique compared with existing RCM studies that typically operate at 25-50 km scale, and make the results relevant to hydrological phenomena occurring at the spatial scale of the infrastructure designed to drain off rainfall in large urban areas. Extreme events with one- and 24-hour duration were extracted using the Partial Duration Series approach, a Generalized Pareto Distribution was fitted to the data and T-year events for return periods from 2 to 100 years were calculated for the control and scenario period in model cells across Europe. The analysis shows that there will be an increase of the intensity of extreme events generally in Europe; Scandinavia will experience the highest increase and southern Europe the lowest. A 20 year 1-hour precipitation event will for example become a 4 year event in Sweden and a 10 year event in Spain. Intensities for short durations and high return periods will increase the most, which implies that European urban drainage systems will be challenged in the future.

The effect of climate change on urban drainage: an evaluation based on regional climate model simulation

That we are in a period of extraordinary rates of climate change is today evident. These climate changes are likely to impact local weather conditions with direct impacts on precipitation patterns and urban drainage. In recent years several studies have focused on revealing the nature, extent and consequences of climate change on urban drainage and urban runoff pollution issues. This study uses predictions from a regional climate model to look at the effects of climate change on extreme precipitation events. Results are presented in terms of point rainfall extremes. The analysis involves three steps: Firstly, hourly rainfall intensities from 16 point rain gauges are averaged to create a rain gauge equivalent intensity for a 25 x 25 km square corresponding to one grid cell in the climate model. Secondly, the differences between present and future in the climate model is used to project the hourly extreme statistics of the rain gauge surface into the future. Thirdly, the future extremes of the square surface area are downscaled to give point rainfall extremes of the future. The results and conclusions rely heavily on the regional model's suitability in describing extremes at timescales relevant to urban drainage. However, in spite of these uncertainties, and others raised in the discussion, the tendency is clear: extreme precipitation events effecting urban drainage and causing flooding will become more frequent as a result of climate change.

Cost benefit risk--a concept for management of integrated urban wastewater systems?

Urban wastewater systems should be evaluated and analysed from an integrated point of view, taking all parts of the system, that is sewer system, wastewater treatment plant and receiving waters into consideration. Risk and parameter uncertainties are aspects that hardly ever have been addressed in the evaluation and design of urban wastewater systems. In this paper we present and discuss a probabilistic approach for evaluation of the performance of urban wastewater systems. Risk analysis together with the traditional cost-benefit analysis is a special variant of multi-criteria analysis that seeks to find the most feasible improvement alternative for an urban wastewater system. The most feasible alternative in this context is the alternative that has the best performance, meaning that the alternative has the lowest sum of costs, benefits and risks. The sum is expressed as the Net Present Cost (NPC). To use NPC as a decision variable has the problematic effect, that two alternatives performing completely differently when focusing on environmental cost can have the same NPC. The extreme example is one alternative with high risk and low cost and another with low risk and high cost. In this example it is up to the decision-maker to decide whether she wants to spend the budget on preventive installations or cleaning up after failures in the environment.