Surgery in reference centers improves survival of sarcoma patients: a nationwide study

BACKGROUND

NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 sarcoma reference centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB) aiming to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients. Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and expert pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients nationwide. In the present work, the impact of surgery in a reference center on the survival of sarcoma patients investigated using this national NETSARC registry.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients' characteristics and follow-up are prospectively collected and data monitored. Descriptive, uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were conducted in the entire series (N = 35 784) and in the subgroup of incident patient population (N = 29 497).

RESULTS

Among the 35 784 patients, 155 different histological subtypes were reported. 4310 (11.6%) patients were metastatic at diagnosis. Previous cancer, previous radiotherapy, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and Li-Fraumeni syndrome were reported in 12.5%, 3.6%, 0.7%, and 0.1% of patients respectively. Among the 29 497 incident patients, 25 851 (87.6%) patients had surgical removal of the sarcoma, including 9949 (33.7%) operated in a NETSARC center. Location, grade, age, size, depth, histotypes, gender, NF1, and surgery outside a NETSARC center all correlated to overall survival (OS), local relapse free survival (LRFS), and event-free survival (EFS) in the incident patient population. NF1 history was one of the strongest adverse prognostic factors for LRFS, EFS, and OS. Presentation to an MDTB was associated with an improved LRFS and EFS, but was an adverse prognostic factor for OS if surgery was not carried out in a reference center. In multivariate analysis, surgery in a NETSARC center was positively correlated with LRFS, EFS, and OS [P < 0.001 for all, with a hazard ratio of 0.681 (95% CI 0.618-0.749) for OS].

CONCLUSION

This nationwide registry of sarcoma patients shows that surgical treatment in a reference center reduces the risk of relapse and death.

One-bloc percutaneous large biopsy of soft-tissue tumours: feasibility study and possible indications

AIM

To report the early results of the Intact lesion excision system (LES) regarding feasibility, tolerance and efficiency in obtaining soft-tissue tumour samples under ultrasound guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The feasibility and tolerance of Intact LES procedures under ultrasound guidance were studied prospectively in 15 patients. The procedure was performed on an outpatient basis under local anaesthesia by a single interventional radiologist with 6 years of experience and lasted around 30 min.

RESULTS

The feasibility of the Intact LES for soft-tissue masses was good except when lesions were hard and calcified. Tolerance was good, with median pain experienced during the procedure evaluated at 4.5/10 (SD 2.2) and median post-procedural pain at day 1 evaluated at 1.8/10 (SD 2.5). No major complications were observed; however, for vascularised lesions, one case of acute wound bleeding and two post-procedural haematomas led to delayed pain.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous biopsy of suspected soft-tissue sarcoma using the LES device under ultrasound guidance is well tolerated and feasible. After a first non-contributing core biopsy, and especially, in the case of lipomatous lesions, it is a valuable option to consider, as is surgical incision biopsy.

[Sternalis muscle in breast surgery]

The sternalis muscle is a normal anatomic variant, which exists in about 5 to 8% of people. It runs longitudinally superficial to pectoralis major, alongside the sternum. Although the sternalis seems common in cadaveric studies, physicians are not familiar with it, which may lead to confusion in diagnosis. Occasionally, the sternalis may be misinterpreted as a breast mass on mammogramm. In that case, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are useful. We report herein two cases of sternalis muscles encountered during mastectomy.

Non-specifically labelled cells that simulate bone marrow metastases in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer

AIMS

To determine whether the presence of disseminated bone marrow tumour cells at diagnosis is a prognostic factor for breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence or bone metastasis, and to assess their presence as a criterion for evaluation of the potential benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Multiple bone marrow aspirates from 72 breast cancer patients free from metastasis were obtained during surgery at the time of diagnosis and were tested immunologically by alkaline phosphatase antialkaline phosphatase technique with a panel of three antiepithelial monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) KL1, EMA, and HMFG2.

RESULTS

In nine of 72 patients, with each MoAb tested, numerous strongly positive cells always isolated were observed. However, it was demonstrated that these cells were non-specifically labelled and could be found in normal controls.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of marrow tumour cells in 72 operable breast cancer patients. It is suggested that published results may be greatly overestimated and that non-specific labelling may be undetected. More specific MoAb should be found and a correlation with molecular biology should be performed if this criterion is to be considered as a prognostic factor.

[A comparative study of 4 sequential first-line chemotherapy protocols in locally advanced breast cancer]

Between 1977 and 1994, our center administered successively 4 different chemotherapy regimens to 242 evaluable patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Patients with inflammatory signs were excluded. Sixty-eight patients were treated by AVCF (A (adriamycine) + V (vincristine) + C (cytoxan) + F (5FU)), 47 by AECF (A + E (vindesine) + C + F), 81 by CAFP (C + A + F + P (prednisone)) and 46 by AN (A + N (vinorelbine)). The mean number of cycle was 3. One hundred and twenty-five patients (52.5%) responded to chemotherapy and we recorded 35 complete response (14.7%). The response rates at the different combinations were respectively: AVCF: 29.4%, AECF: 53.2%, CAFP: 64.9%, AN: 65.2%, and were independent of tumor size, grade and receptor status. The response rate at the AVCF regimen was significantly worse than the others (p = 0.0005). Breast conserving surgery was performed in 31 patients (14%) and 17 patients (8%) had a complete response. Among the 35 patients with complete response, 21 were treated by radiotherapy alone. Local recurrence occurred in 19 patients (7.9%) and 96 (40%) had advanced disease. The mean follow-up of AVCF regimen was 150 months, 115 months for AECF, 111 for CAFP and 42 months for AN. The disease-free survival and the overall survival were significantly better with AECF, CAFP and AN regimens (DFS p < 0.04, OS p < 0.02). Survival was better in those patients with an objective response (p = 0.002) or with non-affected axillary node at the time of surgery. Our study showed already that AVCF combination was significantly lower than AECF, CAFP, AN in terms of response rate, disease-free survival and overall survival. Waiting the results of randomized studies about the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival, we look for chemotherapy regimen improving the rate of conservative surgery.

[Breast metastasis revealing cancer of the kidney. Apropos of a new case and review of the literature]

Metastases are rarely located in the breast. Generally, breast metastases appear during the course of a known primitive cancer and renal origin is very rare. It is even more exceptional that metastasis reveals renal cancer as observed in this case. Five similar cases have been reported in the literature.

[Conservative treatment of epidermoid cancer of the anal canal combining radiotherapy and curietherapy. Experience at the Antoine-Lacassagne Center]

From 1973 to 1987, 33 patients aged from 46 to 86 years (25 female, 8 male) were treated for a tumour of the anal canal with radiotherapy and curietherapy. Tumour distribution was 7 T1, 19 T2, 7 T3, and 4 patients were N+. After treatment it was possible to assess 31 patients; 29 were in complete remission, remission was obtained in 2 others following surgery. Tolerance was comparable to other series but 4 patients developed necrosis of the anal canal; 2 patients died under general anesthesia and 1 patient had a radiation injury of the small intestine. The sphincter was conserved in 65 p. cent of cases. Relapse occurred in 8 patients within 6-92 months, and 6 patients developed metastases. Overall survival was 78 p. cent at 3 years and 74 p. cent at 5 and 10 years. Disease-free survival was 65 p. cent at 3 and 5 years and 52 p. cent at 10 years. Our results confirm those of other series using a similar treatment plan. This treatment is difficult to put into practice. Patients must be carefully selected preferably by a team including proctologist, surgeon and radiotherapist.