Association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with neurological impairments in pediatric population: A systematic review

Neurological manifestations have been widely reported in adults with COVID-19, yet the extent of involvement among the pediatric population is currently poorly characterized. The objective of our systematic review is to evaluate the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with neurological symptoms and neuroimaging manifestations in the pediatric population. A literature search of Cochrane Library; EBSCO CINAHL; Global Index Medicus; OVID AMED, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO; and Scopus was conducted in accordance with the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies form (October 1, 2019 to March 15, 2022). Studies were included if they reported (1) COVID-19-associated neurological symptoms and neuroimaging manifestations in individuals aged <18 years with a confirmed, first SARS-CoV-2 infection and were (2) peer-reviewed. Full-text reviews of 222 retrieved articles were performed, along with subsequent reference searches. A total of 843 no-duplicate records were retrieved. Of the 19 identified studies, there were ten retrospective observational studies, seven case series, one case report, and one prospective cohort study. A total of 6985 individuals were included, where 12.8% (n = 892) of hospitalized patients experienced neurocognitive impairments which includes: 1) neurological symptoms (n = 294 of 892, 33.0%), 2) neurological syndromes and neuroimaging abnormalities (n = 223 of 892, 25.0%), and 3) other phenomena (n = 233 of 892, 26.1%). Based on pediatric-specific cohorts, children experienced more drowsiness (7.3% vs. 1.3%) and muscle weakness (7.3% vs. 6.3%) as opposed to adolescents. Agitation or irritability was observed more in children (7.3%) than infants (1.3%). Our findings revealed a high prevalence of immune-mediated patterns of disease among COVID-19 positive pediatric patients with neurocognitive abnormalities.

Association of SARS-CoV-2 Infection with Neurological Symptoms and Neuroimaging Manifestations in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review

Background

Neurological manifestations have been widely reported in adults with COVID-19, yet the extent of involvement among the pediatric population is currently poorly characterized. The objective of our systematic review is to evaluate the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with neurological symptoms and neuroimaging manifestations in the pediatric population.

Methods

A literature search of Cochrane Library; EBSCO CINAHL; Global Index Medicus; OVID AMED, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO; and Scopus was conducted in accordance with the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies form (October 1, 2019 to March 15, 2022). Studies were included if they reported (1) COVID-19-associated neurological symptoms and neuroimaging manifestations in individuals aged < 18 years with a confirmed, first SARS-CoV-2 infection and were (2) peer-reviewed. Full-text reviews of 222 retrieved articles were performed, along with subsequent reference searches.

Results

A total of 843 nonduplicate records were retrieved. Of the 19 identified studies, there were ten retrospective observational studies, seven case series, one case report, and one prospective cohort study. A total of 6,985 individuals were included, where 12.8% of hospitalized patients experienced neurocognitive impairments: MIS-C (24.2%), neuroinflammation (10.1%), and encephalopathy (8.1%) were the most common disorders; headaches (16.8%) and seizures (3.8%) were the most common symptoms. Based on pediatric-specific cohorts, children experienced more drowsiness (7.3% vs. 1.3%) and muscle weakness (7.3% vs. 6.3%) as opposed to adolescents. Agitation or irritability was observed more in children (7.3%) than infants (1.3%).

Conclusion

Our findings revealed a high prevalence of immune-mediated patterns of disease among COVID-19 positive pediatric patients with neurocognitive abnormalities.

Antibiotic resistance associated with the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are two intersecting global public health crises.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AMR across health care settings.

DATA SOURCE

A search was conducted in December 2021 in WHO COVID-19 Research Database with forward citation searching up to June 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY

Studies evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on AMR in any population were included and influencing factors were extracted. Reporting of enhanced infection prevention and control and/or antimicrobial stewardship programs was noted.

METHODS

Pooling was done separately for Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of 6036 studies screened, 28 were included and 23 provided sufficient data for meta-analysis. The majority of studies focused on hospital settings (n = 25, 89%). The COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with a change in the incidence density (incidence rate ratio 0.99, 95% CI: 0.67-1.47) or proportion (risk ratio 0.91, 95% CI: 0.55-1.49) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant enterococci cases. A non-statistically significant increase was noted for resistant Gram-negative organisms (i.e. extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem or multi-drug resistant or carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii, incidence rate ratio 1.64, 95% CI: 0.92-2.92; risk ratio 1.08, 95% CI: 0.91-1.29). The absence of reported enhanced infection prevention and control and/or antimicrobial stewardship programs initiatives was associated with an increase in gram-negative AMR (risk ratio 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.20). However, a test for subgroup differences showed no statistically significant difference between the presence and absence of these initiatives (p 0.40).

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic may have hastened the emergence and transmission of AMR, particularly for Gram-negative organisms in hospital settings. But there is considerable heterogeneity in both the AMR metrics used and the rate of resistance reported across studies. These findings reinforce the need for strengthened infection prevention, antimicrobial stewardship, and AMR surveillance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Doppler derived aortic valve resistance in aortic stenosis: its hemodynamic validation

Recent reports have emphasized the limitations of aortic valve area estimations using the Gorlin formula based on the Toricelli model. Since aortic valve resistance (AVR) does not use a constant and treats the pressure gradient and the cardiac output without favouring either, it has been proposed as a more accurate index of the severity of aortic stenosis. Though it has previously been calculated using pressure and flow parameters obtained in the catheterization laboratory, it is possible to derive the valve resistance using Doppler echocardiography. Doppler-echo estimates of AVR may be used as an alternative index of aortic stenosis severity; however, no data exists as to its accuracy compared with cardiac catheterization derived AVR. Thirty-nine patients with aortic stenosis undergoing invasive hemodynamic and Doppler-echo evaluations were studied. The AVR was calculated using the formula: (mean pressure gradient)/(flow per systolic ejection period). The cardiac output at catheterization was measured by using thermodilution technique, whilst the Doppler-echo method utilized the product of velocity time integral of the flow in left ventricular outflow tract and its cross sectional area. The Doppler-echo derived AVR (38.5 to 738.2 dyne.sec.cm-5) correlated significantly (r = 0.82, p < 0.0001, S.E.E. = 75.0 dyne.sec.cm-5) with independently derived catheterization values (53.6 to 738.8 dyne.sec.cm-5). There was a good correlation between mean gradient obtained by both modalities.

CONCLUSION

Doppler-echo AVR correlates well with catheterization AVR and may provide an additional non-invasive parameter of aortic stenosis severity.